Next Article in Journal
Pulsed Electric Field-Assisted “Green” Extraction of Betalains and Phenolic Compounds from Opuntia stricta var. dillenii Prickly Pears: Process Optimization and Biological Activity of Green Extracts
Previous Article in Journal
Inhibitory Effect of Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica Thunb.) Extract on the Melanosis and Quality Deterioration of Pacific White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) During Cold Storage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella and Characterization of Two Mcr-1-Harboring Isolates from Pork Products in Guangdong, China

1
State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Department of Food Science & Technology, School of Agriculture & Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2
College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Foods 2025, 14(17), 2933; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14172933
Submission received: 1 August 2025 / Revised: 15 August 2025 / Accepted: 21 August 2025 / Published: 22 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Food Microbiology)

Abstract

Salmonella is a major foodborne pathogen that poses an increasing threat due to the emergence of mcr-1-mediated colistin resistance. However, data on mcr-1-positive Salmonella in pork products are limited. In this study, 457 samples collected in 2023 from pig slaughterhouses in Guangdong province were investigated to determine the prevalence and genomic characteristics of mcr-1-positive Salmonella isolates. We found that 92 Salmonella isolates (20.1%, 92/457) were recovered, representing six serotypes, including Salmonella Typhimurium (n = 29) and Salmonella Rissen (n = 29). High resistance to tetracycline (90.2%, 83/92) and multidrug resistance (58.7%, 54/92) were observed. Critically, two colistin-resistant Salmonella Kentucky ST198 isolates (2.2%) harboring mcr-1 on transferable IncI2 plasmids were identified. Genomic analysis revealed a novel multidrug resistance region (MRR, ~57 kb) inserted into the bcfH locus (containing floR, qnrS1, blaCTX-M-55, and aph (3’)-Ia) and a variant Salmonella Genomic Island 1 (SGI1-KI, containing tet (A), sul1, qacEΔ1 and aadA7) in these isolates. The MRR and SGI1-KI may enhance bacterial survival under antibiotic selection pressure. Phylogenetic analysis showed close relatedness to human clinical strains, suggesting food chain transmission. The findings highlight a high antimicrobial resistance burden, the emergence of transferable last-resort colistin resistance (mcr-1), and acquisition of complex resistance determinants (MRR, SGI1-KI), underscoring an urgent need for enhanced “One Health” surveillance.

1. Introduction

Salmonella is a predominant etiological agent of foodborne gastroenteritis that imposes substantial global public health burdens [1]. Worldwide epidemiological assessments attribute approximately 131 million annual cases and 370,000 fatalities to this pathogen [2]. Surveillance systems reveal distinct regional incidence patterns: European Union data documented 65,208 confirmed human infections in 2022, equivalent to 15.3 cases per 100,000 population [3]. Concurrently, United States surveillance indicates an estimated 1.35 million yearly infections (CDC), with the FoodNet network reporting 2022 incidence at 16.3 per 100,000 [4]. In the Chinese context, Salmonella contamination underlies 70–80% of foodborne disease episodes [5], triggering approximately 9.87 million gastroenteritis cases annually. Nationwide foodborne gastroenteritis incidence in China is concurrently estimated at 245 cases per 100,000 population [6].
Salmonella, a Gram-negative bacillus within the Enterobacteriaceae family, currently comprises two recognized species: Salmonella bongori and Salmonella enterica, with over 2600 serotypes documented worldwide [5]. Human transmission frequently occurs through the food chain, with swine and pork products being significant vehicles [5,7]. Indeed, pork is consistently identified as a major contributor to human Salmonella infections [8], with epidemiological studies linking approximately 15 to 23% of human salmonellosis cases directly to pork consumption [9]. Concurrently, concerns persist regarding the extensive and often inappropriate application of antimicrobial agents in livestock production, a practice widely believed to drive the proliferation of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial pathogens [10]. The rise in MDR Salmonella isolates poses substantial challenges for effective clinical management of infections [6]. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is projected to become a leading global health threat, potentially responsible for 10 million annual deaths by 2050 [11], solidifying antimicrobial-resistant bacteria as a paramount public health concern of the 21st century [12].
Colistin, a last-resort antimicrobial agent derived from bacteria, is critical for treating infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens [13]. A significant development occurred in 2015 with the discovery of the first plasmid-borne polymyxin resistance gene, mcr-1, in Enterobacteriaceae from food animals. This finding highlighted the potential for horizontal dissemination of colistin resistance among bacteria [14]. Subsequently, mcr-1 has been identified globally in diverse bacterial species, including Salmonella isolates from humans, animals, food, and environmental sources, creating a complex genetic reservoir for its evolution [15]. Multiple variants of the mcr gene family (mcr-1 to mcr-5 and mcr-9) have now been reported in Salmonella across these reservoirs, with mcr-1 being the predominant type [16]. These genes encode phosphoethanolamine transferases that modify lipid A by adding phosphoethanolamine. This enzymatic alteration reduces the net negative charge of the bacterial outer membrane, diminishing colistin binding affinity and conferring resistance [17]. Although mcr-1-positive Salmonella isolates have been detected in humans and food animals, their prevalence remains low [18]. In China, reports of foodborne bacteria harboring mcr-1 primarily involve Escherichia coli (E. coli) from retail meats [18]; however, data concerning pork products are still limited.
Guangdong Province ranks among China’s largest pork producers and consumers, with pork products serving as a critical transmission vehicle for Salmonella. Currently, few studies provide comprehensive AMR surveillance data for Salmonella in pork slaughterhouses in this high-risk region. To address this knowledge gap, this study assessed the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella isolates obtained from pork products in Guangdong slaughterhouses in 2023. All isolates were screened via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for mcr genes, and isolates carrying these genes underwent subsequent genomic characterization. The findings aim to provide foundational data to support the development of interventions designed to reduce the spread of AMR in foodborne Salmonella.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Salmonella Isolation

Between January 2023 and December 2023, a total of 457 pig carcass samples were collected from two slaughterhouses (Slaughterhouse 1 and Slaughterhouse 2) in Guangdong Province, China. This study was conducted with formal approval from the operational management departments of both participating slaughterhouses. Sampling was conducted across eight months (January, March, May, June, July, August, October, December). The monthly sample distribution per slaughterhouse was highly consistent: Slaughterhouse 1 contributed 206 samples (typically 26 samples/month, reducing to 25 in October and December), while Slaughterhouse 2 contributed 251 samples (typically 31 samples/month, increasing to 32 in August, October, and December). This resulted in a consistent total of 57 samples per month for most months, except August, which had 58 samples (Table S1). Salmonella isolation was performed using a modified adaptation of the ISO 6579-1:2017 protocol [19]. Pork products (carcass samples) were taken before cooling of the pig carcasses. Each sample was randomly and aseptically collected, sealed in sterile bags, and immediately stored in portable cooling boxes at 4–8 °C. All samples were transported to the laboratory within 8 h post-collection for processing. Upon arrival, approximately 25 g of each sample was rinsed with 225 mL of buffered peptone water (Huankai, China) as the initial processing step. This mixture was then subjected to shaking incubation at 37 ± 1 °C (160 rpm) for 4 h. Subsequently, 1 mL of the resulting pre-enrichment Culture was inoculated into 9 mL of tetrathionate broth (Huankai, China) and incubated at 42 °C. Following enrichment, a loopful of the culture was plated onto xylose lysine tergitol 4 agar (XLT-4; Huankai, China). Presumptive Salmonella colonies identified on XLT-4 were selected for confirmation via PCR targeting the invA gene and serotype determination was conducted using the White–Kauffmann method [20].

2.2. Salmonella Genomic DNA Extraction

Total genomic DNA was extracted from fresh overnight Salmonella cultures using the TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China), following the manufacturer’s protocol with minor strain-specific optimizations. Approximately 3–5 mL of culture was centrifuged (12,000 rpm, 1 min) to pellet cells and discard supernatant. Resuspend the pellet in 200 μL Buffer GA. Add 20 μL Proteinase K and 220 μL Buffer GB, mix, then incubate at 70 °C for 10 min until the solution clears. Add 220 μL ethanol, mix, and load the mixture onto the CB3 spin column. Centrifuge (12,000 rpm, 30 s) and discard flow-through. Wash the column sequentially with 500 μL Buffer GD and twice with 600 μL Buffer PW (centrifuging 30 s each time). Dry the column by centrifugation (2 min) and air-drying (2–5 min). Elute DNA with 50–200 μL Buffer TE (centrifuge 2 min). DNA concentration and quality were assessed using the NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and samples were stored at –20 °C until downstream analysis.

2.3. Multi-Locus Sequence Typing of Salmonella Isolates

To determine the genetic lineages of the 92 Salmonella isolates, multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) was performed by sequencing seven distinct housekeeping genes (aroC, dnaN, hemD, hisD, purE, sucA, and thrA) [21]. PCR amplification of seven housekeeping genes was conducted in 50 μL reaction volumes containing: 25 μL of 2× Taq Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing), 2 μL of each primer (10 μM), 2 μL template DNA (~50 ng), and 19 μL nuclease-free water. Thermocycling conditions comprised initial denaturation at 95 °C (5 min); 30 cycles of 95 °C (30 s), 55 °C (30 s), and 72 °C (1 min); and final extension at 72 °C (10 min). Amplicons were verified by 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis, purified, and bidirectionally sequenced. Sequence types (STs) were assigned using the Salmonella MLST database (EnteroBase), and phylogenetic relationships were analyzed in GrapeTree v1.5.0 to generate a minimum spanning tree based on allelic profiles [22].

2.4. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) of Salmonella Isolates

The antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the Salmonella isolates were determined using both agar dilution and broth dilution methods, following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (2023) [23]. Testing encompassed 18 antimicrobial agents spanning 10 distinct classes: ciprofloxacin (CIP), ofloxacin (OFX), nalidixic acid (NAL), cefepime (FEP), cefotaxime (CTX), ampicillin (AMP), meropenem (MEM), tigecycline (TGC), tetracycline (TET), kanamycin (KAN), amikacin (AMK), gentamicin (GEN), streptomycin (STR), sulfisoxazole (SUL), fosfomycin (FOS), chloramphenicol (CHL), azithromycin (AZI), and colistin (COL). For agar dilution, Mueller–Hinton agar (Oxoid) plates were prepared with serial two-fold dilutions of antimicrobials. Antimicrobial stocks were prepared following CLSI (2023) recommendations and stored at −80 °C prior to incorporation into agar [23]. Bacterial suspensions adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard (1–5 × 108 CFU/mL) were diluted 1:10 in sterile saline to achieve 1–5 × 104 CFU/spot. Suspensions were inoculated onto plates and incubated at 37 °C for 16–20 h. Broth microdilution utilized cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth (Oxoid) in commercially pre-coated 96-well plates (Thermo Fisher). Inocula were standardized to 0.5 McFarland (1–5 × 108 CFU/mL) in saline, then diluted 1:100 in broth to achieve 5 × 105 CFU/mL. A volume of 100 μL was dispensed per well. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 16–20 h. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were interpreted according to CLSI guidelines (2023) [23]. E. coli ATCC 25922 served as the quality control strain. Isolates exhibiting resistance to antimicrobials from three or more distinct classes were classified as MDR [24].

2.5. Mcr Gene Screening

Screening for mcr gene variants (mcr-1 to mcr-10) in the Salmonella isolates was conducted via multiplex PCR according to established protocols with some modifications [25]. PCR (25 µL total volume) contained 12.5 µL of Taq PCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), 1 µM of each primer, and ~50 ng template DNA. Amplification was conducted in a thermal cycler with initial denaturation at 95 °C (5 min); 35 cycles of 95 °C (30 s), 50~55 °C (30 s), 72 °C (1 min); and final extension at 72 °C (10 min). PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.0% agarose gels and visualized under UV. Each run included positive controls (mcr-carrying strains), negative controls (mcr-negative strains), and no-template controls. The isolates carrying mcr underwent whole-genome sequencing (WGS).

2.6. Whole-Genome Sequencing of Mcr-1-Positive Salmonella Isolates

WGS of the mcr-positive isolates was performed on the Illumina platform (150 bp paired-end reads). For the mcr-1-positive isolate Sal_P23040, complete genome assembly was achieved through long-read sequencing on the PacBio platform using ≥100× coverage. Plasmid replicons and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) were characterized using the web-based tools PlasmidFinder 2.1 and ResFinder 4.1 (https://www.genomicepidemiology.org/ (accessed on 9 May 2025)). The origin of transfer (oriT) for mobilized genes was predicted with oriTfinder (https://bioinfo-mml.sjtu.edu.cn/oriTfinder/ (accessed on 9 May 2025)). Comparative genomic visualization of the mcr-1 genetic context employed Easyfig 2.1 [26] and BRIG 0.95 [27].

2.7. Conjugation Experiments of the Mcr-1 Gene

Conjugative transfer experiments were conducted using mcr-1-positive Salmonella isolates as donor isolates and the plasmid-free, rifampicin-resistant E. coli J53 as the recipient. Overnight cultures were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), adjusted to OD600 = 0.5 (~1 × 108 CFU/mL), and mixed at donor:recipient ratios of 1:1 and 1:10. Cell mixtures (200 μL) were deposited onto 0.22-μm nitrocellulose filters placed on Mueller–Hinton agar and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. Following mating, the transconjugants were screened on MacConkey agar supplemented with rifampicin (200 mg/L) and colistin (2 mg/L). Transfer efficiency was quantified as the transconjugant count per recipient cell. Putative mcr-bearing transconjugants underwent PCR verification following established methodology [28]. Colistin MICs for both the parental E. coli J53 strain and transconjugants were determined using the AST protocol described previously [23].

2.8. Phylogenetic Tree Analysis of Mcr-1-Positive Salmonella Isolates and IncI2 Plasmids

To elucidate the genetic relatedness of mcr-1-positive Salmonella isolates, phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using the kSNP4.1 pipeline [29]. This analysis incorporated the isolates from this study alongside the publicly available genomes retrieved from NCBI and Enterobase. Additionally, a comparative analysis of mcr-1-positive IncI2 plasmids was similarly conducted, integrating one plasmid identified in this study with 14 publicly accessible plasmid sequences from NCBI. All resultant phylogenetic trees underwent visualization through the iTOL v6 online platform (https://itol.embl.de (accessed on 25 May 2025)). A complete list of all bacterial isolates and plasmids used for phylogenetic analyses is provided in Supplementary File S2 (titled ‘Isolates and plasmids for phylogenetic analysis’).

2.9. Data Availability Statement

The whole-genome sequences of the two mcr-1-positive Salmonella isolates have been deposited in GenBank under BioProject PRJNA1299413, with individual Biosample accessions SAMN50301257 and SAMN50301771. The accession number of Sal_P23041 is JBQLIL000000000.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical differences in MDR prevalence across Salmonella serotypes were evaluated using Pearson’s chi-square test, with significance defined at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence Characteristics of Salmonella Isolates from Pork Product Samples

Overall, it is shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 that 92 Salmonella isolates were recovered from 457 pork product samples collected between January and December 2023 across Guangdong Province, China, yielding a 20.1% (92/457) positivity rate. Notably, slaughterhouse surveillance revealed significantly elevated Salmonella prevalence in Slaughterhouse 1 (26.2%, 54/206) compared to Slaughterhouse 2 (15.1%, 38/251) (p < 0.05).
Serotyping via the White–Kauffmann method identified six distinct serovars among the isolates. Salmonella Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) (n = 29) and Salmonella Rissen (S. Rissen) (n = 29) emerged as predominant serovars, followed by Salmonella London (S. London) (n = 20), Salmonella Derby (S. Derby) (n = 11), Salmonella Kentucky (S. Kentucky) (n = 2), and Salmonella Corvallis (S. Corvallis) (n = 1). Sankey diagram analysis further demonstrated substantial serovar diversity and epidemiological distribution across pork products (Figure 1).
Figure S1 displays the minimum spanning tree results, revealing seven distinct STs. ST469 (n = 29) emerged as the predominant type, followed by ST155 (n = 20), ST34 (n = 17), ST19 (n = 12), ST40 (n = 11), ST198 (n = 2), and ST1541 (n = 1). The analysis further demonstrated strong correlations between specific STs and Salmonella serotypes: ST469 with S. Rissen, ST155 with S. London, ST34 and ST19 with S. Typhimurium, ST40 with S. Derby, and ST198 with S. Kentucky.

3.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Analysis of Salmonella Isolates

It is shown in Table 2 that 89.1% (82/92) of Salmonella isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial class. In total, 58.7% (54/92) of isolates exhibited MDR, while 31.5% (29/92) possessed the specific ACSSuT profile (ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfisoxazole, tetracycline resistance). The most common resistance was to tetracycline (89.1%, 82/92), followed by sulfisoxazole (77.2%, 71/92), ampicillin (58.7%, 54/92), nalidixic acid (33.7%, 31/92), streptomycin (31.5%, 29/92), chloramphenicol (31.5%, 29/92), ciprofloxacin (28.3%, 26/92), and ofloxacin (28.3%, 26/92). Kanamycin and gentamicin resistance were lower (15.2% each, 14/92). Resistance rates of 5% or less were recorded for azithromycin (4.3%, 4/92), cefotaxime (2.2%, 2/92), cefepime (2.2%, 2/92), fosfomycin (2.2%, 2/92), amikacin (1.1%, 1/92), and tigecycline (1.1%, 1/92). Critically, colistin resistance was detected in 2 isolates (2.2%, 2/92). Meropenem susceptibility was observed in all isolates (100%).
Resistance to ampicillin, tetracycline, streptomycin, sulfisoxazole and chloramphenicol was commonly observed among the Salmonella serovars (Table 2). Notably, MDR rates varied significantly between serovars: S. Derby (90.9%, 10/11) and S. Typhimurium (89.7%, 26/29) exhibited markedly higher rates than S. Rissen (37.9%, 11/29) and S. London (20.0%, 4/20) (p < 0.01). Resistance patterns for specific antibiotics followed similar trends. For example, both sulfisoxazole resistance (S. Derby: 90.9%; S. Typhimurium: 93.1%) and ampicillin resistance (S. Derby: 90.9%; S. Typhimurium: 89.7%) were widespread in these serovars, contrasting with the lower levels seen in S. London (sulfisoxazole: 70.0%; ampicillin: 20.0%). Quinolone resistance (ofloxacin) was also notably elevated in S. Derby (63.6%) and S. Typhimurium (41.4%), while tetracycline resistance was universal in S. Typhimurium (100%) and both S. Kentucky isolates (100%). Alarmingly, both S. Kentucky isolates demonstrated resistance to critically important drugs, including cefotaxime, cefepime, and colistin.
The AMR profiles of the 92 Salmonella isolates are detailed in Table S2. Twenty-one distinct AMR profiles were identified. Among resistant isolates, the TET-SUL profile (resistance to 2 antimicrobial classes) was found to be most prevalent (19.6%, 18/92), followed by TET-SUL-AMP-NAL-CIP-OFX (four classes; 13.0%, 12/92), TET (one class; 10.9%, 10/92), and TET-SUL-AMP-STR-CHL-KAN (five classes; 8.7%, 8/92). An increase in the number of resisted antimicrobial classes was observed: resistance to one class was exhibited by 10.9% (10/92) of isolates (exclusively TET profile), to two classes by 19.6% (18/92; TET-SUL), to three classes by 4.3% (4/92; TET-SUL-AMP), to four classes by 14.1% (13/92), to five classes by 16.3% (15/92), and to six classes by 10.9% (10/92). Furthermore, resistance to seven antimicrobial classes was detected in two isolates. Additionally, two isolates demonstrated resistance to eight antimicrobial classes. Given that this study tested susceptibility across 10 antimicrobial classes, these two isolates met the criteria for extensively drug-resistant (XDR) classification—defined as susceptibility to only 1 or 2 classes of all agents tested [24]. This finding warrants significant concern, as available therapeutic options for infections caused by such bacteria are substantially limited.
This study also conducted a comparative analysis of AMR profiles on Salmonella isolates recovered from Slaughterhouse 1 (n = 54) and Slaughterhouse 2 (n = 38) (Figure 2 and Table S3). Resistance to tetracycline and sulfisoxazole was prevalent in both slaughterhouses, but significantly higher rates were observed in Slaughterhouse 1 compared to Slaughterhouse 2 (tetracycline: 92.6% vs. 84.2%, sulfisoxazole: 85.2% vs. 65.8%). Crucially, a substantially higher MDR rate was detected in Slaughterhouse 1 (70.4%) compared to Slaughterhouse 2 (42.1%). Serovar-specific divergence was evident: in slaughterhouse one, all S. Typhimurium (n = 18) and S. Derby (n = 8) isolates were confirmed as MDR and uniformly exhibited resistance to sulfisoxazole, ampicillin, and tetracycline. S. Derby isolates were further characterized by exceptional quinolone resistance (nalidixic acid/ofloxacin/ciprofloxacin: 87.5%), while both S. Kentucky isolates demonstrated near-pan-resistance. In contrast, within slaughterhouse two, although S. Typhimurium (n = 11) maintained a high MDR rate (72.7%), S. Rissen (n = 16) showed significantly lower MDR prevalence (18.8%). Furthermore, resistance to critically important antimicrobials (cefotaxime, cefepime and colistin) was observed and exclusively identified in Slaughterhouse 1 isolates.

3.3. Genomic Characteristics of Two Mcr-1-Positive S. Kentucky Isolates

In total, 2 of the 92 Salmonella isolates (2.2%) were positive for the mcr-1 gene and exhibited phenotypic colistin resistance (MIC = 4 mg/L for both). These two mcr-1-positive isolates (Sal_P23040 and Sal_P23041), identified as S. Kentucky ST198, demonstrated extensive co-resistance to multiple antimicrobial classes (Table 3). Genomic analysis of Sal_P23040 revealed one complete chromosome and two plasmids: p1Sal_P23040 (89,313 bp, IncI) and p2Sal_P23040 (60,661 bp, IncI2). A total of nine ARGs and three mutations in quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs), conferring resistance to seven antimicrobial categories, were identified. Genetic mapping confirmed that the mcr-1 gene was located on the IncI2 plasmid, while all other resistance genes (including blaCTX-M-5, qnrS1, and tet (A)) were chromosomally encoded (Figure S2). Sal_P23041 harbored the identical set of ARGs and QRDR mutations to Sal_P23040. The phenotypic resistance profiles strongly correlated with specific resistance determinants. The plasmid-borne mcr-1 mediated colistin resistance. blaCTX-M-5 conferred resistance to β-lactams (ampicillin, cefotaxime, cefepime). High-level quinolone resistance (nalidixic acid, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin) resulted from the combination of qnrS1 and QRDR mutations in gyrA (S83F, D87N) and parC (S80I), tet (A) mediated tetracycline resistance. The floR conferred resistance to chloramphenicol. The sul1 was responsible for sulfonamide resistance (sulfisoxazole) and aminoglycoside resistance (streptomycin, kanamycin, gentamicin) was associated with multiple genes (aac (6’)-Iaa, aadA7, aph (3’)-Ia). Additionally, both isolates harbored the qacEΔ1 disinfectant resistance gene. Both isolates were recovered from pig carcass samples collected at the same slaughterhouse (Slaughterhouse 1) in July 2023, indicating a common source. Their identification as S. Kentucky ST198, possession of an identical set of ARGs and QRDR mutations, and nearly identical resistance profiles strongly suggest clonal relatedness. Despite this high degree of similarity, Sal_P23040 exhibited resistance to tigecycline, whereas Sal_P23041 remained susceptible.

3.4. Phylogenetic Relationship of Mcr-1-Positive S. Kentucky Isolates and IncI2 Plasmids

To evaluate the relationship between the two mcr-1-positive isolates from this study and other mcr-1-positive S. Kentucky isolates globally, we constructed a phylogenetic tree comprising 14 isolates (including our two isolates and 12 mcr-1-positive S. Kentucky isolates retrieved from NCBI and Enterobase databases) to assess clonality (Figure 3A). Our analysis revealed that mcr-1-positive S. Kentucky ST198 has been recovered from diverse sources, including humans, animals, and food. The isolates formed subclade I and subclade II. Notably, within subclade II, isolates from humans and poultry originating from countries such as France, the United Kingdom, and Morocco clustered with the isolates identified in this study. The small branch distances (scale bar < 0.1) among isolates in subclade II indicate a close genetic relationship despite their diverse origins. Specifically, our isolates (Sal_P23040 and Sal_P23041) were most closely related to a clinical human isolate (traces-0lhyZjN) from France. Among all mcr-1-positive isolates, ARGs conferring resistance to sulfonamides (sul1) and quinolones (gyrA (S83F) and parC (S80I)) were the most prevalent (14/14, 100.0%), followed by tet (A) (13/14, 92.9%) and blaTEM-1B (11/14, 78.6%). Importantly, blaCTX-M-55 and qnrS1 were detected exclusively in the isolates from this study. These findings suggest a potential role for the food chain in the dissemination of mcr-1-positive S. Kentucky in China.
Simultaneously, a phylogenetic analysis of 15 mcr-1-positive IncI2 plasmids (Figure 3B) revealed diversity and multiple branches among plasmids collected from various sources (e.g., humans, food) in different countries (e.g., China, Thailand, Oman, Argentina). Notably, the plasmid MG825374.1 (60,960 bp), originating from chicken in China, clustered closely with plasmid p2Sal_P23040 from this study. Additionally, as shown in Figure 4A, most plasmids carried only the mcr-1 gene. The mcr-1 coding sequence in all IncI2 plasmids was located directly upstream of an open reading frame encoding a PAP2 family protein, a feature frequently associated with mcr-1 (Figure 4B). The complete ISApl1 element downstream of the mcr-1 cassette was detected in plasmids AP017614.1, AP017619.1, AP017622.1, CP075719.1, and KX034083.1. The IncI2 plasmids from S. Kentucky contained genes essential for horizontal transfer, including the origin of transfer (oriT), a type IV secretion system (T4SS) cluster, and type IV coupling protein (T4CP) genes. This genetic potential for transfer was confirmed by conjugation assays, in which the mcr-1-positive IncI2 plasmids of S. Kentucky isolates from this study were successfully transferred to E. coli J53. The estimated transfer rates were (2.3 ± 0.23) × 10−3 for Sal_P23040 and (1.8 ± 0.14) × 10−4 for Sal_P23041, and the resulting transconjugants exhibited colistin resistance.

3.5. Molecular Characteristics of the Multidrug Resistance Region and Salmonella Genomic Island 1

Compared to the intact bcfH gene found in clade ST314 (reference genome GCF_002952975.1), the insertion of a multidrug resistance region (MRR) disrupted the open reading frame (ORF) of the bcfH gene in ST198 isolates (Figure 5A). The bcfH gene encodes a multifunctional oxidoreductase essential for biogenesis of the bovine colonization factor (bcf) fimbriae. However, it does not appear to play a significant role in Salmonella colonization within animal intestines [30,31].
Although previous studies indicated that the qnrS1 gene is typically located on IncHI2 plasmids [32], a chromosome-localized qnrS1 was identified in this study. This finding suggests that the transfer of qnrS1 from plasmids to the chromosome contributes to its stable maintenance within S. Kentucky. Furthermore, parC (S80I) and gyrA (S83F, D87N) mutations were detected in the ST198 isolates. Figure 5A illustrates that in ST198 isolates, blaCTX-M-55 was located within an approximately 57 kb MRR situated downstream of the bcfBCDEFG gene cluster. This MRR, bounded by IS26 elements inserted into the bcfH gene, harbored multiple ARGs, including floR, qnrS1, blaCTX-M-55, and aph (3’)-Ia, conferring resistance to chloramphenicols, quinolones, β-lactams, and aminoglycosides.
Salmonella Genomic Island 1 variant K (SGI1-K) was present in the S. Kentucky ST198 isolates examined in this study. It is shown in Figure 5B that the variant of SGI1-K was identified specifically in the ST198 lineage. Compared to the traditional SGI1-K structure (reference genome AY463797), this variant identified in ST198 isolates was designated SGI1-KI. SGI1-KI retained the genes tet (A) variant, sul1, qacEΔ1, aadA7, and accCA5, but lacked the blaTEM-1b, strAB, IS1133, the segment between S023 and resG, and the tnpR genes.

4. Discussion

This study detected Salmonella in 20.1% of samples from pig slaughterhouses in Guangdong, China. This prevalence rate is higher than rates reported both domestically and internationally. Domestically, it exceeds the rate of 8.2% found in Tibet, China [33]. Internationally, it is substantially higher than rates reported for Portugal (2.0%) [34], South Korea (9.1%) [35], Brazil (2.9%) [36], and Sardinia (13.1%) [37]. Given this high contamination level and the associated risk of human transmission, comprehensive enhancements to hygiene management across the food production chain are urgently needed to reduce contamination risks.
AMR in foodborne Salmonella poses a serious threat to food safety. Our findings revealed a high AMR prevalence (89.1%), with the MDR rate (58.7%) aligning with recent data on Salmonella from Romanian pork products [38]. Resistance to TET, SUL, and AMP was predominant in the present isolates, consistent with reports from pig slaughterhouses in China and Romania [38,39], but higher than rates documented in Ugandan pork [40]. Notably, resistance to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin (both 28.3%) exceeded levels previously recorded [38]. Given that fluoroquinolones remain first-line therapy for human salmonellosis [41], sustained national surveillance of foodborne Salmonella AMR in China is critical. Furthermore, this study detected two cefepime-resistant isolates and one tigecycline-resistant Salmonella isolate from pork products. These resistance phenotypes are exceptionally rare in foodborne Salmonella. Their presence highlights the critical need to strictly monitor the use of cefepime and tigecycline in pig farming, as well as the emergence and spread of resistance. Future efforts should prioritize targeted surveillance to map the epidemiology of such resistant isolates and conduct traceability studies to determine the origins and transmission pathways of cefepime and tigecycline resistance in pig-derived Salmonella.
Colistin serves as a critical final-resort antibiotic for combating severe infections due to MDR Gram-negative bacteria [13]. Recognizing the threat of resistance, numerous nations have prohibited its use in animal feed. Key bans include Brazil (end of 2016), Thailand (2017), China (2017), Japan (2018), followed by Malaysia, Argentina, India (2019), Indonesia (2020), and the European Union (2022) [42]. With limited novel antibiotics emerging, clinicians increasingly rely on colistin as a ‘last-line’ therapy against these challenging pathogens [43]. Regrettably, this renewed dependence has coincided with a rise in colistin resistance [44]. The spread of the mcr-1 gene and its variants represents a significant public health and livestock industry challenge [18]. Our study detected mcr-1-positive Salmonella isolates at a rate of 2.2%. While this prevalence is substantially lower than rates reported in eggs from Qingdao (52.6%) [45], it exceeds the 0.27% found in various Chinese retail foods between 2011 and 2016 [46]. These findings indicate that Salmonella carrying mcr-1 persists at concerning levels within China’s food chain.
Research has categorized the genetic context of mcr-1 into four distinct structural types [47]. The predominant form is the 2609 bp mobile element Tn6330, identified as a composite transposon. This structure harbors the mcr-1 resistance gene alongside a 765 bp open reading frame (ORF). This ORF potentially encodes a protein resembling members of the PAP2 superfamily. Tn6330 is characteristically flanked by two copies of ISApl1, an insertion sequence from the IS30 family [48]. Analysis in the current investigation revealed that both mcr-1-positive isolates exhibited an mcr-1-pap2 configuration, notably lacking the ISApl1 elements. This absence suggests a possible evolutionary pathway where ISApl1 was excised from the genetic environment of mcr-1 in these isolates, likely through recombination events. This structural variation aligns with previous observations indicating that ISApl1 loss may enhance the persistence of mcr-1 within plasmid vectors, thereby promoting broader dissemination of this critical resistance determinant [49]. Consequently, a more comprehensive understanding of mcr-1 transmission dynamics necessitates further investigation into its precise transposition mechanisms and evolutionary origins.
Both plasmids identified in this study that harbored the mcr-1 gene belonged to the IncI2 incompatibility group. Critically, each plasmid carried intact genetic modules essential for conjugative transfer, including the oriT, T4SS cluster, and T4CP genes. This finding aligns with the previous study [50], which demonstrated that such functional clusters facilitate horizontal plasmid dissemination between bacterial isolates. Their results provide a plausible explanation for the successful experimental transfer of the two mcr-1-positive plasmids observed here.
Salmonella serovars exhibit broad host adaptability, capable of infecting diverse animal species, including mammals, birds, and insects [1]. Consequently, these broad-host-range isolates can be disseminated via feces from animals or through the consumption of various common food products [1]. Phylogenomic comparison of the two isolates characterized in this study with all available mcr-1-positive S. Kentucky sequences from food, human, and environmental sources revealed their close relatedness. Specifically, these isolates formed a distinct cluster alongside a human isolate originating from France. Furthermore, the minimal genetic divergence observed in the phylogenetic tree branches aligns with the consistent ST results. While in vivo transmission experiments were not conducted to confirm potential pathways, these findings imply a phylogenetic proximity between pork and human S. Kentucky ST198 isolates. This suggests pork-borne transmission may constitute an important vehicle for mcr-1-positive S. Kentucky ST198. Enhanced surveillance efforts should therefore prioritize the IncI2 plasmid-mediated spread of mcr-1 within this lineage.
Integration of the MRR into the bcfH locus, disrupting this gene, potentially enhances the survival of S. Kentucky ST198. The MRR confers resistance to multiple antibiotics: kanamycin, streptomycin, cefotaxime, chloramphenicol, and sulfisoxazole. BcfH functions as a multifunctional oxidoreductase essential for biogenesis of the bcf fimbriae [30]. Although the fim operon shows the highest expression among Salmonella’s 13 known fimbrial operons under both laboratory and host conditions, bcf expression specifically occurs within the bovine ileum [51]. Notably, the bcf operon does not significantly contribute to intestinal colonization in avian hosts [52]. ARGs in Salmonella frequently arise from selective pressures linked to antibiotic use in animal food production and veterinary medicine for growth promotion and disease control [53]. Thus, MRR-mediated bcfH disruption likely provides a survival advantage for S. Kentucky ST198 within antibiotic-intensive environments.
A novel SGI1-K variant carrying a mercury resistance module was identified in both S. Kentucky ST198 isolates. Compared to the SGI1-K prototype, this variant exhibited specific deletions: blaTEM-1b, strAB, IS1133, the segment between S023 and resG, and the tnpR gene [54]. These structural changes indicate rapid intraclonal evolution and differ from patterns observed in these isolates, suggesting potential local selection pressures driving adaptation in Chinese isolates. Previous reports describe SGI1 in S. Kentucky ST198 as highly mosaic, with IS26-mediated gene acquisitions or losses generating extensive structural diversity [55]. We propose that this inherent structural flexibility within SGI1 may confer adaptive advantages to this high-risk clone

5. Conclusions

This study found that the AMR levels in Salmonella from Chinese pork products were alarmingly high in 2023, with an MDR rate of 58.7% and a complex, diverse resistance profile. Resistance to critically important clinical drugs (e.g., tigecycline) used for MDR Salmonella infection treatment was confirmed. Notably, IncI2 plasmids carrying the mcr-1 gene were identified in S. Kentucky ST198 isolates from pork products. Horizontal transfer of these plasmids constitutes a key dissemination vehicle for mcr-1 among pork-derived Salmonella in China. Phylogenetic evidence further indicates that pork-borne transmission facilitates the spread of mcr-1-positive S. Kentucky ST198 from the food chain to humans. The MRR and the SGI1-KI, containing multiple ARGs, may enhance Salmonella survival under antibiotic selection pressure. Building on these concerning findings, a multi-faceted mitigation strategy is imperative. This includes strictly reducing and phasing out the use of colistin and other critically important antimicrobials as growth promoters or prophylactics in swine production to alleviate selection pressure. Concurrently, accelerating the development and deployment of effective alternatives—such as vaccines targeting prevalent Salmonella serovars, probiotics, bacteriophages, enhanced biosecurity, and improved husbandry practices—is crucial to decrease reliance on antimicrobials. Furthermore, exploring novel interventions targeting epidemic plasmid dissemination, like conjugation inhibitors or CRISPR-Cas-based plasmid curing, could help limit the horizontal spread of mcr-1 and other resistance determinants. Strengthening integrated “One Health” surveillance systems across human, veterinary, and environmental sectors is essential for real-time detection of emerging resistance and enabling targeted interventions at critical points along the pork production continuum (farm, slaughter, processing, retail).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods14172933/s1: Figure S1: Minimum spanning tree of Salmonella isolates by multi-locus sequence typing; Figure S2: Schematic diagram of the whole genome sequence of isolate Sal_P23040; Table S1: Monthly Salmonella Positivity Rate in Two Pig Slaughterhouses in Guangdong Province, 2023; Table S2: The antimicrobial resistance spectrums of 92 Salmonella isolates; Table S3: Antimicrobial Resistance Among Salmonella and the Salmonella Serotypes Isolated from Different Pig Slaughterhouses in Guangdong, China. File S2: Isolates and plasmids used for the phylogenetic analysis.

Author Contributions

Z.M. and L.W.: Methodology, investigation, writing—original draft preparation. C.S.: review and editing. Z.Z.: Conceptualization, supervision, funding acquisition, review and editing. All authors have read and agreed on the final approval of the version to be submitted. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Guangdong Province Undergraduate Scientific and Technological Innovation Project (Pandeng Program) (Grant No. pdjh2016a0072).

Data Availability Statement

The data in the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no financial, personal, or professional interests that could influence the content or evaluation of this manuscript.

References

  1. Lamichhane, B.; Mawad, A.M.; Saleh, M.; Kelley, W.G.; Harrington, P.J.; Lovestad, C.W.; Amezcua, J.; Sarhan, M.M.; El Zowalaty, M.E.; Ramadan, H. Salmonellosis: An overview of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and innovative approaches to mitigate the antimicrobial resistant infections. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stanaway, J.D.; Parisi, A.; Sarkar, K.; Blacker, B.F.; Reiner, R.C.; Hay, S.I.; Nixon, M.R.; Dolecek, C.; James, S.L.; Mokdad, A.H. The global burden of non-typhoidal Salmonella invasive disease: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 1312–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zizza, A.; Fallucca, A.; Guido, M.; Restivo, V.; Roveta, M.; Trucchi, C. Foodborne infections and Salmonella: Current primary prevention tools and future perspectives. Vaccines 2024, 13, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Delahoy, M.J. Preliminary incidence and trends of infections caused by pathogens transmitted commonly through food—Foodborne diseases active surveillance network, 10 US sites, 2022. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2023, 72, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhan, Z.; He, S.; Chang, J.; Hu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Cui, Y.; Shi, X. Characterization of novel mutations involved in the development of resistance to colistin in Salmonella isolates from retail pork in Shanghai, China. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2025, 430, 111027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, P.; Zhan, L.; Wang, H.; Gao, W.; Gao, L.; Lv, S.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, G.; Yan, Y. First identification and limited dissemination of mcr-1 colistin resistance in Salmonella isolates from Jiaxing. J. Food Prot. 2022, 85, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tanyitiku, M.N.; Nicholas, G.; Petcheu, I.C.N.; Sullivan, J.J.; On, S.L. Public health risk of foodborne pathogens in edible African land snails, Cameroon. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2022, 28, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Soliani, L.; Rugna, G.; Prosperi, A.; Chiapponi, C.; Luppi, A. Salmonella infection in pigs: Disease, prevalence, and a link between swine and human health. Pathogens 2023, 12, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vigre, H.; Barfoed, K.; Swart, A.N.; Simons, R.R.; Hill, A.A.; Snary, E.L.; Hald, T. Characterization of the human risk of salmonellosis related to consumption of pork products in different EU countries based on a QMRA. Risk Anal. 2016, 36, 531–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Karnwal, A.; Jassim, A.Y.; Mohammed, A.A.; Al-Tawaha, A.R.M.S.; Selvaraj, M.; Malik, T. Addressing the global challenge of bacterial drug resistance: Insights, strategies, and future directions. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1517772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pulingam, T.; Parumasivam, T.; Gazzali, A.M.; Sulaiman, A.M.; Chee, J.Y.; Lakshmanan, M.; Chin, C.F.; Sudesh, K. Antimicrobial resistance: Prevalence, economic burden, mechanisms of resistance and strategies to overcome. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 170, 106103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Murray, C.J.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; Swetschinski, L.; Aguilar, G.R.; Gray, A.; Han, C.; Bisignano, C.; Rao, P.; Wool, E. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sharma, E.; Chen, Y.; Kelso, C.; Sivakumar, M.; Jiang, G. Carbapenems and colistin as last-resort antibiotics: A review of challenging environmental impacts and analytical methods. Soil Environ. Health 2024, 2, 100058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, Y.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Walsh, T.R.; Yi, L.-X.; Zhang, R.; Spencer, J.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.; Dong, B.; Huang, X. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: A microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, J.-H.; Liu, Y.-Y.; Shen, Y.-B.; Yang, J.; Walsh, T.R.; Wang, Y.; Shen, J. Plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance genes: Mcr. Trends Microbiol. 2024, 32, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Portes, A.B.; Rodrigues, G.; Leitão, M.P.; Ferrari, R.; Conte Junior, C.A.; Panzenhagen, P. Global distribution of plasmid—Mediated colistin resistance mcr gene in Salmonella: A systematic review. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 132, 872–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Janssen, A.B.; van Hout, D.; Bonten, M.J.; Willems, R.J.; van Schaik, W. Microevolution of acquired colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae from ICU patients receiving selective decontamination of the digestive tract. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3135–3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Xiaomin, S.; Yiming, L.; Yuying, Y.; Zhangqi, S.; Yongning, W.; Shaolin, W. Global impact of mcr-1-positive Enterobacteriaceae bacteria on “one health”. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 46, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sheng, H.; Suo, J.; Dai, J.; Wang, S.; Li, M.; Su, L.; Cao, M.; Cao, Y.; Chen, J.; Cui, S.; et al. Prevalence, antibiotic susceptibility and genomic analysis of Salmonella from retail meats in Shaanxi, China. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2023, 403, 110305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhan, Z.; He, S.; Hu, M.; Cui, Y.; Tai, C.; Shi, X. High Prevalence of Multidrug-resistant Salmonella from Retail Meat in Shanghai and the Molecular Characterization of blaNDM-9-carrying Plasmid. J. Future Foods 2025, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Buddhasiri, S.; Sukjoi, C.; Tantibhadrasapa, A.; Mongkolkarvin, P.; Boonpan, P.; Pattanadecha, T.; Onton, N.; Laisiriroengrai, T.; Coratat, S.; Khantawa, B. Clinical characteristics, antimicrobial resistance, virulence genes and multi-locus sequence typing of non-typhoidal Salmonella Serovar typhimurium and enteritidis strains isolated from patients in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, Z.; Alikhan, N.-F.; Sergeant, M.J.; Luhmann, N.; Vaz, C.; Francisco, A.P.; Carriço, J.A.; Achtman, M. GrapeTree: Visualization of core genomic relationships among 100,000 bacterial pathogens. Genome Res. 2018, 28, 1395–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lubbers, B.; Diaz-Campos, D.; Schwarz, S.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals, 5th ed.; CLSI Supplement VET01S; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Malvern, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  24. Magiorakos, A.-P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.; Giske, C.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, Y.; He, Y.; Nguyen, S.V.; Liu, C.; Liu, C.; Gan, X.; Wang, W.; Dong, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, F. Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella Indiana from retail chickens in China and emergence of an mcr-1-harboring isolate with concurrent resistance to ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, and colistin. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 955827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sullivan, M.J.; Petty, N.K.; Beatson, S.A. Easyfig: A genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 1009–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Alikhan, N.-F.; Petty, N.K.; Ben Zakour, N.L.; Beatson, S.A. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): Simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, H.; Xiang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Liang, B.; Xu, X.; Xie, J.; Du, X.; Yang, C.; Liu, H.; Liu, H. Genetic characterization of mcr-1-positive multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium isolated from intestinal infection in children and pork offal in China. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 774797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hall, B.G.; Nisbet, J. Building phylogenetic trees from genome sequences with kSNP4. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2023, 40, msad235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Subedi, P.; Paxman, J.J.; Wang, G.; Hor, L.; Hong, Y.; Verderosa, A.D.; Whitten, A.E.; Panjikar, S.; Santos-Martin, C.F.; Martin, J.L. Salmonella enterica BcfH is a trimeric thioredoxin-like bifunctional enzyme with both thiol oxidase and disulfide isomerase activities. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2021, 35, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ledeboer, N.A.; Frye, J.G.; McClelland, M.; Jones, B.D. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium requires the Lpf, Pef, and Tafi fimbriae for biofilm formation on HEp-2 tissue culture cells and chicken intestinal epithelium. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 3156–3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. She, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Luo, M.; Duan, X.; Xie, L.; Yang, C.; Xu, L.; Fu, Y.; Lv, Z.; Cai, R. Emergence of chromosomally located blaCTX-M-14b and qnrS1 in Salmonella enterica serotype Kentucky ST198 in China. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2023, 62, 106896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, G.; Kang, X.; Wang, S.; Meng, C.; Gu, D.; Song, L.; Jiao, X.; Pan, Z. Prevalence and Characteristics of Salmonella from Tibetan Pigs in Tibet, China. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2024, 21, 560–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gonçalves, C.; Silveira, L.; Rodrigues, J.; Furtado, R.; Ramos, S.; Nunes, A.; Pista, Â. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. isolates from pigs at slaughterhouse and from commercial pork meat in Portugal. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, T.; Kim, Y.; Kim, H.; San Moon, J.; Chon, J.; Song, K.-Y.; Seo, K.-H. Prevalence of Salmonella serotypes isolated from clinical samples in chicken farms and meat in slaughterhouses in South Korea. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 105147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Garcia, L.N.H.; da Cunha Dias, S.; Costa, L.R.M.; de Melo Tavares, R.; da Silva Rodrigues, R.; Tiba-Casas, M.R.; Cossi, M.V.C.; Nero, L.A.; Yamatogi, R.S. Cross-contamination and antimicrobial resistance in diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. from a mixed bovine and swine slaughterhouse. Food Control. 2025, 176, 111406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Siddi, G.; Piras, F.; Meloni, M.P.; Migoni, M.; Cuccu, M.; Simbula, F.; Serra, E.; Crobu, L.; Casula, M.; Manca, F. Salmonella and Yersinia enterocolitica through the pig meat chain in Sardinia: Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and genetic insight. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2024, 14, 13199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tăbăran, A.; Dan, S.D.; Colobaţiu, L.M.; Mihaiu, M.; Condor, S.; Mărgăoan, R.; Crişan-Reget, O.L. Evaluation of Multidrug Resistance of Salmonella Isolated from Pork Meat Obtained from Traditional Slaughter Systems in Romania. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, H.; Zhou, G.; Yang, C.; Nychas, G.-J.E.; Zhang, Y.; Mao, Y. The prevalence, distribution, and diversity of Salmonella isolated from pork slaughtering processors and retail outlets in the Shandong Province of China. Meat Sci. 2025, 221, 109734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kivali, V.; Roesel, K.; Dohoo, I.; Alinaitwe, L.; Bugeza, J.K.; Hoona, J.J.; Mugizi, D.R.; Kankya, C.; Dang-Xuan, S.; Szabo, I. Non-typhoidal Salmonella among slaughterhouse workers and in the pork value chain in selected districts of Uganda. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 1427773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Frey, E.; Stapleton, G.S.; Nichols, M.C.; Gollarza, L.M.; Birhane, M.; Chen, J.C.; McCullough, A.; Carleton, H.A.; Trees, E.; Hise, K.B. Antimicrobial resistance in multistate outbreaks of nontyphoidal Salmonella infections linked to animal contact—United States, 2015–2018. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2024, 62, e00981-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Olaitan, A.O.; Dandachi, I.; Baron, S.A.; Daoud, Z.; Morand, S.; Rolain, J.-M. Banning colistin in feed additives: A small step in the right direction. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 29–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Taglialegna, A. Reviving colistin. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nang, S.C.; Azad, M.A.; Velkov, T.; Zhou, Q.T.; Li, J. Rescuing the last-line polymyxins: Achievements and challenges. Pharmacol. Rev. 2021, 73, 679–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, C.; Gu, X.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zou, M.; Liu, B. The occurrence and genomic characteristics of mcr-1-harboring Salmonella from retail meats and eggs in Qingdao, China. Foods 2022, 11, 3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hu, Y.; Nguyen, S.V.; Liu, C.; Wang, W.; Dong, Y.; Fanning, S.; Li, F. Complete genome and plasmid sequences of seven isolates of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica harboring the mcr-1 gene obtained from food in China. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2019, 8, e00114-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, R.; Yu, H.; Xie, M.; Chen, K.; Dong, N.; Lin, D.; Chan, E.W.-C.; Chen, S. Genetic basis of chromosomally-encoded mcr-1 gene. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 51, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Snesrud, E.; McGann, P.; Chandler, M. The birth and demise of the IS Apl1-mcr-1-IS Apl1 composite transposon: The vehicle for transferable colistin resistance. MBio 2018, 9, e02381-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Snesrud, E.; He, S.; Chandler, M.; Dekker, J.P.; Hickman, A.B.; McGann, P.; Dyda, F. A model for transposition of the colistin resistance gene mcr-1 by IS Apl1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 6973–6976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, X.; Xie, Y.; Liu, M.; Tai, C.; Sun, J.; Deng, Z.; Ou, H.Y. oriTfinder: A web-based tool for the identification of origin of transfers in DNA sequences of bacterial mobile genetic elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W229–W234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Humphries, A.D.; Raffatellu, M.; Winter, S.; Weening, E.H.; Kingsley, R.A.; Droleskey, R.; Zhang, S.; Figueiredo, J.; Khare, S.; Nunes, J. The use of flow cytometry to detect expression of subunits encoded by 11 Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium fimbrial operons. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 48, 1357–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Clayton, D.J.; Bowen, A.J.; Hulme, S.D.; Buckley, A.M.; Deacon, V.L.; Thomson, N.R.; Barrow, P.A.; Morgan, E.; Jones, M.A.; Watson, M. Analysis of the role of 13 major fimbrial subunits in colonisation of the chicken intestines by Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis reveals a role for a novel locus. BMC Microbiol. 2008, 8, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nazari Moghadam, M.; Rahimi, E.; Shakerian, A.; Momtaz, H. Prevalence of Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from poultry meat: Virulence and antimicrobial-resistant genes. BMC Microbiol. 2023, 23, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hamidian, M.; Holt, K.E.; Hall, R.M. The complete sequence of Salmonella genomic island SGI1-K. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 305–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hall, R.M. Salmonella genomic islands and antibiotic resistance in Salmonella enterica. Future Microbiol. 2010, 5, 1525–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Characterization of Salmonella isolates (n = 92) from pork products: slaughterhoues; serotypes; MLST; MDR patterns (Sankey plot). Rectangle height corresponds to the number of Salmonella isolates. The line graph depicts serotype distribution across slaughterhouses, while distinct colors represent different serotypes for STs, MDR status, colistin resistance, and ACSSuT resistance profiles.
Figure 1. Characterization of Salmonella isolates (n = 92) from pork products: slaughterhoues; serotypes; MLST; MDR patterns (Sankey plot). Rectangle height corresponds to the number of Salmonella isolates. The line graph depicts serotype distribution across slaughterhouses, while distinct colors represent different serotypes for STs, MDR status, colistin resistance, and ACSSuT resistance profiles.
Foods 14 02933 g001
Figure 2. The serotype and antibiotic resistance diversity of Salmonella in two slaughterhouses. The average resistance distribution (in percent) of total Salmonella isolates and various serotypes in Slaughterhouse 1 and Slaughterhouse 2.
Figure 2. The serotype and antibiotic resistance diversity of Salmonella in two slaughterhouses. The average resistance distribution (in percent) of total Salmonella isolates and various serotypes in Slaughterhouse 1 and Slaughterhouse 2.
Foods 14 02933 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationship of mcr-1-positive Salmonella Kentucky isolates and IncI2 plasmids. (A) Phylogenetic analysis of 14 mcr-1-positive S. Kentucky isolates, comprising 12 isolates sourced from NCBI and Enterobase. Isolates sequenced in this study (Sal_P23040 and Sal_P23041) are denoted by red markers. The basic information of the isolates and the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes (red) are shown. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of 15 IncI2 plasmids carrying the mcr-1 gene, comprising 14 plasmids sourced from NCBI. The plasmid sequenced in this study (p2Sal_P23040) is denoted by a red marker.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationship of mcr-1-positive Salmonella Kentucky isolates and IncI2 plasmids. (A) Phylogenetic analysis of 14 mcr-1-positive S. Kentucky isolates, comprising 12 isolates sourced from NCBI and Enterobase. Isolates sequenced in this study (Sal_P23040 and Sal_P23041) are denoted by red markers. The basic information of the isolates and the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes (red) are shown. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of 15 IncI2 plasmids carrying the mcr-1 gene, comprising 14 plasmids sourced from NCBI. The plasmid sequenced in this study (p2Sal_P23040) is denoted by a red marker.
Foods 14 02933 g003
Figure 4. Comparative analysis of the complete IncI2 plasmids carrying the mcr-1 gene. (A) Comparative analysis of 15 complete IncI2 plasmids carrying the mcr-1 gene using the BRIG tool. The outermost ring represents the annotation of plasmid p2Sal_P23040. Genes are color-coded based on their functional annotation. Genes responsible for horizontal transfer: T4CP is colored green, the T4SS clusters are colored blue. The antimicrobial resistance genes mcr-1 and pap2 are colored red. (B) Comparison of the mcr-1 genetic context across all plasmids. All plasmids contain the pap2-mcr-1 unit. Plasmids AP017614.1, AP017619.1, AP017622.1, CP075719.1 and KX034083.1 contain the transposon ISApl1; the other plasmids lack this transposon.
Figure 4. Comparative analysis of the complete IncI2 plasmids carrying the mcr-1 gene. (A) Comparative analysis of 15 complete IncI2 plasmids carrying the mcr-1 gene using the BRIG tool. The outermost ring represents the annotation of plasmid p2Sal_P23040. Genes are color-coded based on their functional annotation. Genes responsible for horizontal transfer: T4CP is colored green, the T4SS clusters are colored blue. The antimicrobial resistance genes mcr-1 and pap2 are colored red. (B) Comparison of the mcr-1 genetic context across all plasmids. All plasmids contain the pap2-mcr-1 unit. Plasmids AP017614.1, AP017619.1, AP017622.1, CP075719.1 and KX034083.1 contain the transposon ISApl1; the other plasmids lack this transposon.
Foods 14 02933 g004
Figure 5. Molecular characteristics of the multidrug resistance region and Salmonella Genomic Island 1. (A) Linear comparison of the genetic structure of the multidrug resistance region (MMR) inserted into the bcfH gene in S. Kentucky ST198 isolates. Chromosomal genes are marked in light blue, while insertion sequences (IS) and resistance genes are marked in yellow and red, respectively. (B) Linear comparison of the genetic structure of the Salmonella Genomic Island 1 (SGI1) variant inserted downstream of the trmE gene in S. Kentucky ST198 isolates. Results compared with the reference SGI (AY463797). Resistance genes are marked in red as shown in the legend, and insertion sequences (IS) are marked in yellow. The gray shadowing denotes BLASTn matching regions.
Figure 5. Molecular characteristics of the multidrug resistance region and Salmonella Genomic Island 1. (A) Linear comparison of the genetic structure of the multidrug resistance region (MMR) inserted into the bcfH gene in S. Kentucky ST198 isolates. Chromosomal genes are marked in light blue, while insertion sequences (IS) and resistance genes are marked in yellow and red, respectively. (B) Linear comparison of the genetic structure of the Salmonella Genomic Island 1 (SGI1) variant inserted downstream of the trmE gene in S. Kentucky ST198 isolates. Results compared with the reference SGI (AY463797). Resistance genes are marked in red as shown in the legend, and insertion sequences (IS) are marked in yellow. The gray shadowing denotes BLASTn matching regions.
Foods 14 02933 g005
Table 1. Prevalence of Salmonella from pork product samples in 2023 in Guangdong, China.
Table 1. Prevalence of Salmonella from pork product samples in 2023 in Guangdong, China.
Pig SlaughterhousesNumber of SamplesNumber of Samples Positive for SalmonellaPercentage of Positive Samples (%)
One2065426.2
Two2513815.1
Total4579220.1
Table 2. Antimicrobial Resistance Among Salmonella and Salmonella serotypes recovered from pork products in Guangdong, China.
Table 2. Antimicrobial Resistance Among Salmonella and Salmonella serotypes recovered from pork products in Guangdong, China.
AntimicrobialsNumber of Antimicrobial-Resistant Isolates Among (%)
All Salmonella (n = 92)Typhimurium (n = 29)Rissen (n = 29)London (n = 20)Derby (n = 11)Kentucky (n = 2)Corvallis (n = 1)
Folate pathway inhibitors
Sulfisoxazole71 (77.2)27 (93.1)17 (58.6)14 (70.0)10 (90.9)2 (100)1 (100)
Quinolones
Nalidixic acid31 (33.7)16 (55.2)3 (10.3)3 (15.0)7 (63.6)2 (100)0 (0)
Ofloxacin26 (28.3)12 (41.4)2 (6.9%)3 (15.0)7 (63.6)2 (100)0 (0)
Ciprofloxacin26 (28.3)12 (41.4)2 (6.9%)3 (15.0)7 (63.6)2 (100)0 (0)
β-Lactam
Ampicillin54 (58.7)26 (89.7)11 (37.9)4 (20.0)10 (90.9)2 (100)1 (100)
Cefotaxime2 (2.2)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (100)0 (0)
Cefepime2 (2.2)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (100)0 (0)
Tetracyclines
Tetracycline82 (89.1)29 (100)26 (89.7)14 (70.0)10 (90.9)2 (100)1 (100)
Tigecycline1 (1.1)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (50.0)0 (0)
Phenicols
Chloramphenicol29 (31.5)15 (51.7)7 (24.1)2 (10.0)2 (18.2)2 (100)1 (100)
Aminoglycosides
Streptomycin29 (31.5)15 (51.7)7 (24.1)2 (10.0)2 (18.2)2 (100)1 (100)
Gentamicin14 (15.2)1 (3.4)1 (3.4)2 (10.0)8 (72.7)2 (100)0 (0)
Amikacin1 (1.1)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (50.0)0 (0)
Kanamycin14 (15.2)9 (31.0)3 (10.3)0 (0)0 (0)2 (100)0 (0)
Polymyxins
Colistin2 (2.2)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (100)0 (0)
Macrolides
Azithromycin4 (4.3)0 (0)2 (6.9%)2 (10.0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Fosfomycins
Fosfomycin2 (2.2)0 (0)1 (3.4)1 (5.0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Carbapenems
Meropenem0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Multidrug resistance54 (58.7)26 (89.7)11 (37.9)4 (20.0)10 (90.9)2 (100.0)1 (100.0)
Table 3. Antimicrobial susceptibility, conjugation rate, and whole genome analysis of two mcr-1-positive isolates collected in this study.
Table 3. Antimicrobial susceptibility, conjugation rate, and whole genome analysis of two mcr-1-positive isolates collected in this study.
CategoryAntimicrobial ClassAntimicrobial AgentSal_P23040Sal_P23041
MIC (mg/L)Related GenesMIC (mg/L)Related Genes
Antimicrobial susceptibility testingFolate pathway inhibitorsSulfisoxazole>2048sul1>2048sul1
QuinolonesNalidixic acid>128qnrS1, gyrA (S83F, D87N), parC (S80I)>128qnrS1, gyrA (S83F, D87N), parC (S80I)
Ofloxacin1616
Ciprofloxacin1616
β-LactamAmpicillin>256blaCTX-M-55>256blaCTX-M-55
Cefotaxime3232
Cefepime1616
TetracyclinesTetracycline128tet(A)64tet(A)
Tigecycline4<0.5
PhenicolsChloramphenicol128floR128floR
AminoglycosidesStreptomycin128aac (6’)-Iaa, aadA7, aph (3’)-Ia128aac (6’)-Iaa, aadA7, aph (3’)-Ia
Gentamicin1616
Amikacin64<4
Kanamycin256256
PolymyxinsColistin4mcr-1.14mcr-1.1
MacrolidesAzithromycin<2 <2
FosfomycinsFosfomycin<4 <4
CarbapenemsMeropenem<0.25 <0.25
Collection time 20232023
Serotype Salmonella KentuckySalmonella Kentucky
Sequence type ST198ST198
mcr-1 location IncI2IncI2
Conjugation rate (2.3 ± 0.23) × 10−3(1.8 ± 0.14) × 10−4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mai, Z.; Wei, L.; Shi, C.; Zhan, Z. Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella and Characterization of Two Mcr-1-Harboring Isolates from Pork Products in Guangdong, China. Foods 2025, 14, 2933. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14172933

AMA Style

Mai Z, Wei L, Shi C, Zhan Z. Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella and Characterization of Two Mcr-1-Harboring Isolates from Pork Products in Guangdong, China. Foods. 2025; 14(17):2933. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14172933

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mai, Zifeng, Lusan Wei, Chunlei Shi, and Zeqiang Zhan. 2025. "Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella and Characterization of Two Mcr-1-Harboring Isolates from Pork Products in Guangdong, China" Foods 14, no. 17: 2933. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14172933

APA Style

Mai, Z., Wei, L., Shi, C., & Zhan, Z. (2025). Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella and Characterization of Two Mcr-1-Harboring Isolates from Pork Products in Guangdong, China. Foods, 14(17), 2933. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14172933

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop