Next Article in Journal
Anti-Proliferative and Anti-Migration Activity of Arene–Ruthenium(II) Complexes with Azole Therapeutic Agents
Next Article in Special Issue
Zinc(II) as a Versatile Template for Efficient Dipolar and Octupolar Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Molecular Materials §
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Validation of Liquid Chromatography-Based Methods to Assess the Lipophilicity of Cytotoxic Platinum(IV) Complexes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Porphyrins for Second Order Nonlinear Optics (NLO): An Intriguing History §
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

State of the Art of Boron and Tin Complexes in Second- and Third-Order Nonlinear Optics §

by
Cristina C. Jiménez
1,
Alejandro Enríquez-Cabrera
1,
Oscar González-Antonio
1,
Javier Ordóñez-Hernández
1,
Pascal G. Lacroix
2,
Pablo Labra-Vázquez
1,
Norberto Farfán
1 and
Rosa Santillan
3,*
1
Facultad de Química, Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 Ciudad de México, México
2
Laboratoire de Chimie de Coordination du CNRS, 205 route de Narbonne, F-31077 Toulouse, France
3
Departamento de Química, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, CINVESTAV, Apdo. Postal 14-740, 07000 Ciudad de México, México
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
§
This review is particularly dedicated to Prof. Renato Ugo on the occasion of his 80th birthday, whose contribution has been fundamental in this field.
Inorganics 2018, 6(4), 131; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6040131
Submission received: 31 October 2018 / Revised: 29 November 2018 / Accepted: 5 December 2018 / Published: 10 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal Complexes as Nonlinear Optical Molecular Materials)

Abstract

:
Boron and tin complexes have been a versatile and very interesting scaffold for the design of nonlinear optical (NLO) chromophores. In this paper we present a wide range of reports since the 1990s to date, which include second-order (e.g., second harmonic generation) and third-order (e.g., two-photon absorption) NLO properties. After a short introduction on the origin of the NLO response in molecules, the different features associated with the introduction of these inorganic motifs in the organic-based NLO materials are discussed: Their effect on the accepting/donating capabilities of the substituents, on the efficiency of the π-conjugated linkage, and on the topology of the chromophores which can be tuned from the first generation of “push-pull” chromophores to more sophisticated two- or three-dimensional architectures.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nonlinear optics is the multidisciplinary research domain which investigates the properties arising from the interactions of matter with intense electromagnetic fields, thus producing modified fields that are different from those of the input field in frequency, amplitude, phase or polarization [1]. Most nonlinear optical (NLO) responses were not observed before 1960 when Maiman built the first laser at the Hughes Research Laboratories of the Hughes Aircraft company in Malibu, California [2,3]. Since that time, the world of nonlinear optics is indeed intricately associated to the world of lasers.
In the summer of 1961, Peter Franken and his group [4], at the University of Michigan, at Ann Arbor performed the first experiment of frequency doubling, or Second Harmonic Generation (SHG), on a crystal of quartz irradiated by a ruby laser operating at 694 nm [5]. This first historical experiment is illustrated in Figure 1.

1.1. Organic Molecules for Second-Order NLO Properties

The first observation of a second-order NLO property in an organic material, was made by Rentzepis and Pao, at Bell Telephone Laboratories in 1964 [6], when crystals of 3,4-benzopyrene, and 1,2-benzanthracene were irradiated with intense ruby laser light. Later on, in 1978, Buckingham and Clarke [7], studied the NLO processes in atoms and molecules.
Since this pioneering work, organic materials have acquired relevance as they were found to exhibit ultra-fast response times to optical excitation, low dielectric constants and a synthetic design flexibility which allows to perform structural modifications to modulate the NLO effect, by virtue of the tremendous capabilities of organic synthetic chemistry [8]. Other advantages are their high optical damage threshold and low cost [1].
At the most fundamental level, the molecular NLO response is expressed from the polarization (μ) of a molecule subjected to a laser light as follows:
μ(E) = μ0 + αE + βE2 + γE3 + …
An expression in which μ0 is the permanent dipole moment, α the polarizability, β and γ respectively the first- and second-order hyperpolarizabilities (origin of the first- and second-order NLO properties) and E being the electric field component of the light. The most investigated NLO properties (e.g., SHG) are ultimately related to β which is expressed in cm5 × esu−1, which will be called esu here for simplification.
Although organic molecules with second-order NLO properties are only a class of NLO materials, they have dominated the field as the most studied chromophores. Furthermore, the electronic features required to understand the origin of their NLO response can easily be transposed to more sophisticated systems to a large extent. Therefore, they are described here as the most useful benchmark model for providing an efficient guideline towards the most promising NLO molecules.
Most traditional organic NLO chromophores are planar molecules with a strong electron-donating group (D) and an electron-acceptor group (A), connected via a π-conjugated structure acting as an electronic bridge to facilitate charge transfer across the molecule. These donor-acceptor chromophores are known as the “push-pull” systems (Figure 2).
The electron donor groups often have electron lone pairs of high energy and are characterized by hybridization with predominantly p characters (sp3, 75% p), as in a disubstituted amine -NR2. The electron acceptor groups (A) are characterized by the presence of unoccupied orbitals having low energy levels (as in three-coordinated boron compounds), with more s character bonding such as sp in nitrile, or sp2 in nitrobenzene organic compounds.
In 1968, Kurtz and Perry [9] described a simple and quick experimental technique which permits the rapid classification of materials according to a magnitude of nonlinear optical coefficients relative to a crystalline quartz standard, and the existence or absence of phase matching direction(s) for second-harmonic generation. The technique only requires the material in powder form (readily available in most cases), unlike single crystals of reasonably good optical and dielectric quality which are difficult to obtain. This development was the first systematic investigation for detecting second- harmonic generation in crystalline powders. With a reasonably high reliability, the method enables one to classify a new material in one of five categories: Class A: Phase-matchable for second-harmonic generation; nonlinear coefficients large (substantially greater than crystalline quartz), Class B: Phase-matchable for second-harmonic generation; nonlinear coefficients small (same order of magnitude as crystalline quartz), Class C: Nonlinear coefficients greater than crystalline quartz; not phase-matchable for second-harmonic generation, Class D: Nonlinear coefficients equal to or less than crystalline quartz; not phase-matchable for second-harmonic generation, and Class E: Centrosymmetric (first-order nonlinearities vanish due to symmetry considerations).
Kurtz and Perry provided an initial survey of approximately 100 compounds, SHG was detected for the first time in 56 of these materials and 27 of them were assigned to the phase-matchable categories. Single-crystal measurements on four of these latter compounds verified the existence of phase-matching directions for second-harmonic generation. This powder technique provided a substantial increase in the number of new materials for use in nonlinear optics applications.
In 1977, Oudar [10] reported the influence of donor and acceptor groups on the second and third order hyperpolarizabilities of a series of π conjugated molecules such as styrene and stilbene derivatives with various substituents. These were measured by static-electric field induced second harmonic generation (DC-SHG) and tunable four-wave mixing both in liquids and solutions. These compounds showed nonlinearities 10 times larger than their benzene derivatives, this is due to a greater π conjugated system. In the case of the disubstituted molecules containing donor and acceptor groups at opposite ends, they possess strong intramolecular charge transfer that promotes a large enhancement of β.
Among the numerous factors that contribute to the increase of second-order NLO properties in organic compounds are:
  • The relative position of the donor-acceptor groups on a π-conjugated structure in order to benefit from the best path of delocalization. For instance, in the example of a D/A disubstituted phenyl (Figure 3), it has long been recognized that the para substituted isomer leads to the best charge transfer effect and hence to the largest β value.
  • The length of the π system. Increasing the length of the π system increases the NLO properties of organic compounds, since the long range π-delocalization brings the main component to the molecular polarizability (Equation (1)). In high-β chromophores, computations based on the Pariser-Parr-Pople (PPP) model have proven useful and reliable when applied to different chromophores. Experimentally-determined β values and PPP-obtained show an excellent correlation (βPPP ≤ 2.5 βexp), the largest value has been achieved by C7 β vec ( PPP ) = 466.8 × 10 −30 esu and β vec ( exp ) = 470 790 × 10 −30 esu. (Figure 4) [11,12].
  • Crystallization in non-centrosymmetric space groups in the case of second-order bulk effects. Equation (1) leads to the important symmetry requirement that, in order for β to be non-zero, the molecule must necessarily be non-centrosymmetric. This can be easily understood from the fact that μ(−E) = −μ(E) in centrosymmetric entities, therefore β(−E)(−E) = β(E)(E) and hence β = 0. The polarization (P) of a macroscopic material is again given by an expression analogous to Equation (1), expressed as follows:
    P(E) = χ(0) + χ(1)E + χ(2)E2 + χ(3)E3 +…
    where χ(2) is the second-order susceptibility which is related to the underlying β. An important point to note is that the requirement for non-centrosymmetry is valid in the solid state as well, so the molecules must necessarily crystallize in non-centrosymmetric space groups. In that case, the bulk property is frequently approached semi-quantitatively through a solid state powder test which expresses the SHG efficiency of the materials versus that of a reference (e.g., urea [13]). Some examples of organic solids with SHG efficiencies are gathered in Figure 5 [14].
Thus, the reported powder SHG value for the series of compounds C8C15 in Figure 5 are some noteworthy cases in terms of their SHG values. For instance, 4-bromo-4’-methoxychalcone, (C8), shows β values of 10–70 vs. urea, depending on the solvent from which the material was crystallized, for 2-N-cyclooctylamino-5-nitropyridine (C9) β = 50 vs. urea while 3-methyl-4-methoxy-4′-nitrostilbene (C13) has the highest reported β value, 1250 times vs. urea, and 2-methyl-4-nitroaniline (C14) shows a value of 22 vs. urea.

1.2. From Second-Order to Third-Order NLO Properties

At first, the key parameters at the origin of the third-order properties (γ in Equation (1)) seem to be closely related to those at the origin of β, making the third-order properties a simple extension of the second-order properties. On the other hand, γ is related to an odd term (∝E3) in the development of Equation (1), therefore it is subject to no symmetry requirement. Indeed, centrosymmetric molecules, which are silent in second-order nonlinear optics, can be strongly efficient in third-order applications. Moreover, it has been suggested by Marder [15] that the most promising strategy to optimize γ should be to focus the search on chromophores having a vanishing β. Along this line, the most efficient systems in third-order nonlinear optics should necessarily be centrosymmetric. Therefore, there are two classes of efficient third-order chromophores: The dipolar (“push-pull”) chromophores exhibiting both second- and third-order properties, and the quadrupolar (centrosymmetric) chromophores in which extremely large third-order NLO responses can be observed [15].
There are numerous optical properties associated to γ (e.g., third harmonic generation, Kerr effect) but the most widely investigated one is the capability for a molecule to absorb two photons simultaneously, known as two-photon absorption (TPA) [16]. While the capability of a molecule to absorb one photon is related to its extinction coefficient (ε), its capability to absorb two photons is quantified as the molecular cross-section (σTPA) expressed in Göppert-Mayer (GM). In the present review, most of the third-order reports will be on the cross-section (σTPA) rather than on the third-order hyperpolarizability γ however, they are related by the following expression:
σ T P A = 8 π 2 ω 2 n 2 c 2 L 4 I m γ
where ω is the laser frequency, n the refractive index, c the velocity of light in vacuum, L the local field factor, and Imγ the imaginary part of γ [16,17,18].
Finally, the choice to talk specifically about boron and tin complexes, from the myriad of inorganic NLO-responsive species, springs from three main points. First, as will be seen through the contents and as can be seen in the literature, there has been a perfectly traceable evolution in design and rational building of NLO-responsive chromophores that stems from the understanding of their electronic properties and synthetic accessibility. Therefore, it is possible to perform a historical tracing of the attempts to obtain better chromophores of this kind, that help to clarify fundamental phenomena and that can possess different applications. Secondly, in the recent years, there is no compendium about the species we will discuss further down in the present text. Due to the abundance of boron and tin complexes, review articles about modern architectures and applications are severely scarce and scattered in terms of the compounds they encompass. In the case of tin, this is even more evident since the available literature about tin complexes specifically as NLO-responsive species is not so abundant. So, our intention is to purse a comprehensive compendium which deals with the modern literature about this important chromophores.

2. NLO Properties in Organoboron Compounds and Boron Complexes

2.1. Second-Order NLO Properties

Boron compounds that exhibit nonlinear optical properties can generally be found in three forms:
  • Where boron is in neutral form, it acts as electron acceptor due its Lewis acid character. This is exemplified in Figure 6 for 5-(dimesitylboryl)-5′-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)-2,2′-dithienyl B1.
  • Where boron is in ionic form, it acts as an electron donor, as observed in B2 (Figure 7).
  • Where the boron forms an adduct with nitrogen, for instance in a boronated pyridine (Figure 8), the creation of the B–N bond turns the pyridine from a weak withdrawing unit to a much stronger one, which leads to enhanced intramolecular charge transfer and hence, larger NLO response.
Various three-coordinated and tetracoordinated boron containing materials have been reported in relation to potential NLO properties.
The most characteristic electronic properties of trivalent boron are related to its vacant pz-orbital [19] (Figure 9).
Three-coordinated boron atom is an electron acceptor, it is a Lewis acid, and is isoelectronic to a carbocation; with a trigonal planar geometry, it is electron deficient, which allows an effective π-p conjugation with an adjacent organic π-system. The Lewis acid character of three-coordinated boron atom can be inhibited by steric hindrance.
Tetracoordinated boron acts as an electron-donating substituent and possesses a negative charge and an occupied pz-orbital. Tetracoordinated boron compounds are more stable than the three-coordinated ones, and the modification of the electronic and hindrance effects allows the tuning of their nonlinear optical properties.
The development of functional materials which use boron as the main element started with the work of Williams from the Kodak group [20,21]. Kanis et al. [11] made the first theoretical calculations of the quadratic hyperpolarizabilities of organoboranes in stilbene chromophores, in 1991 using the semiempirical ZINDO calculations.
Yuan, Marder et al. [22] synthesized air-stable ”push-pull” E-alkenes of the form E-D–CH=CH–B(Mes)2 by hydroboration of π-donor substituted alkynes with dimesitylborane as a π-electron acceptor, obtaining β values of 11 × 10−30 esu for 4-Me2N–C6H4–B(Mes)2, and 9.2 × 10−30 esu for 4-H2N–C6H4–NO2.
In 1991, Lequan et al. [23] evidenced large changes in dipole moment occurring upon charge transfer transitions through an investigation of the solvatochromic shift in the push-pull derivatives 4-(dimethylamino)biphenyl-4′-yl]dimesitylborane (B4) and [4-(dimethylamino)-phenylazophenyl-4′-yl]dimesitylborane (B5). Solvatochromism provides an approach towards β, based on a dominant charge transfer transition accounting for the entire NLO response of the molecule. Under this assumption, the so called resulting βCT were found to be equal to 37 and 210 × 10−30 esu. (Figure 10).
Later on, the β values of these two chromophores were estimated more accurately by use of the EFISH techniques [13,24] which allows to get the projection of β along the molecular dipole moment (μ0) of the chromophores; assuming β parallel to μ0 leads to the actual hyperpolarizability β value of 42 × 10−30 for B4 and 72 × 10−30 esu for B5 [14] were obtained. The sizeable NLO response indicates an excellent withdrawing capability of the dimethyl boron comparable to that of a nitro substituent.
In 1993, Yuan et al. [25] synthesized “push-pull” organoboranes (E)-Fc–CH=CH–B(Mes)2 and (E)-Ph2–P–CH=CH–B(Mes)2, powder SHG signal was observed for the latter compound which crystallized in a non-centrosymetric space group. Evaluation of β by the EFISH technique, resulted in a value of −24 × 10−30 esu, comparable to many classical organic donor-acceptor systems.
In 1996, Branger et al. [26] synthesized molecules with dimesitylboron as the acceptor group, bithiophene as the unsaturated chain and pyrrolidine-1-yl, dithianylidene and 3-thienyl as donor groups. EFISH measurements revealed β values of 37 × 10−30 esu for B6 and 31 × 10−30 esu for B7 derivatives. The replacement of the biphenyl unsaturated chain by bithiophene improved the dipole moment and the quadratic hyperpolarizabilities of the boron derivatives, despite a lack of planarity suggested at the computational level (Figure 11).
In 1997, Branger et al. [27] synthesized new polyurethanes with high glass transition temperature (Tg) containing azo-dyes with NLO properties in which dimesityl boron groups are used as electron acceptors (Figure 12). Having high Tg polymers leads to the expectation that once aligned at high temperature under strong electric fields, this will result in non-centrosymmetry, and therefore the NLO signal will be maintained at room temperature all over the life time of the device.
In 1998, Lesley et al. [28] reported on the second-order NLO properties determined by the EFISH technique in a series of neutral pyridyl adducts containing the strong Lewis acids BF3 and B(C6F5)3. This study indicates that there is a good communication in chromophores with coordinated Lewis-acidic boranes, BF3 and B(C6F5)3, acting as efficient electron acceptors. The β values range between 48 × 10−30 esu for B11 and B12 to 155 × 10−30 esu for B14. The β(0) values range between 30 × 10−30 esu to 72.5 × 10−30 esu for the pyridine/BF3 and B(C6F5)3 Lewis adducts. The β × μ product is doubled in most cases upon complexation with the strong Lewis acids, due to an increase of the molecular dipole moments (μ) and the second-order NLO coefficients (β), the largest values being realized for the (dimethylamino)stilbazole derivatives. Finally, the NLO response is increased by 50% as compared to the disperse red 1 (DR1) standard reference (Figure 13).
Further computational investigations by Su et al. in 2001 [29] using the quantum chemical AM1/Finite Field method on pyridine, styryl pyridine, and phenylethinyl pyridine/borane adducts were in good agreement with the experimental values determined by Lesley [28].
In 2002, Farfán, Santillan, Lacroix et al. [30] studied ”push-pull” boronates, in which the boron atom is attached in the π-conjugated bridge. They observed that β may be influenced by the molecular geometry in the vicinity of the boron atom. A computational investigation revealed that tuning the hyperpolarizability becomes possible by a controlled rotation of the phenylboronic fragment (Figure 14).
In 2002, Entwistle and Marder [31] reviewed the nonlinear optical properties of three and four-coordinate boron (which have been discussed before in this manuscript), and related compounds and polymers, highlighting the contributions of Williams, Glowgowski, Kaim, Lequan, and Marder groups.
In 2004, Entwistle and Marder [32] studied β by the EFISH technique for 4,4′(E)-(dimesitylboryl)(N,N-dimethylamino)stilbene, which was found to be 45 × 10−30 esu at 1.907 μm.
In 2006, Yamaguchi and Wakamiya [33] discussed the characteristic features of the boron element that their group use as a basis of molecular design. This is based on three fundamental features of the boron element: (1) The existence of an empty p-orbital; (2) the Lewis acidity of boron; and (3) the geometric feature of boron.
In 2006, Lamère, Farfán, Lacroix et al. [34] proposed a molecular switch induced by an electric field applied on a tetracoordinated boron compound, containing two “push-pull” units engineered with free rotation along the boron-carbon bond of a bisboronate structure (Figure 15). The NLO response was compared with that obtained for the monomeric derivative, by the EFISH technique. While the ground state conformation (the off state) is centrosymmetric and SHG silent, the application of an external electric field gradually aligned the subunits and increases the NLO response of the molecule. The EFISH signal is 1.95 times larger for bisboronate than for its monoborated analogue.
In 2008, Santillan et al. [35] found that boronates derived from Schiff bases present second (by EFISH technique) and third order NLO properties that could be tuned by modifying the conformations of the aryl fractions around the boron-carbon bonded to a naphthyl fragment (Figure 16).
In 2009, Lacroix, Farfán, Santillan et al. [36] reported on the synthesis of three boronates derived from bidentate imine ligands. The β × μ product recorded by EFISH shows a trend for a general increase of the NLO response after boron complexation (Figure 17).
Another synthetic effort undergone during 2015, was the one by Zhang [37], whose team modified the (Mes)2B (B24) group through substitution of the methyl groups of the boron atom by electron-withdrawing perfluorophenyl (B25) and 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl (B26) substituents, to produce the acceptor groups (2,6-Me2-4-C6F5–C6H2)2B ((Pfp)2B) and (2,6-Me2-4-(3,5(CF3)2–C6H3)–C6H2)2B ((Tfp)2B), respectively (Figure 18). Zhang found that tuning the donor strength by exchanging the triphenylamine donor for the stronger donor 1,1,7,7-tetramethyljulolidine (B28 and B29) gave further fine control over the optoelectronic properties. Even if the NLO properties of these compounds have not been recorded, they could be considered as good candidates due to their architecture.
In 2017, Ji, Griesbeck and Marder [38] highlighted recent contributions using BMes2 moieties along with the development of alternative strong B-based π–acceptors, focusing on systems which retain or enhance the air-stability of such species, a property which is most desirable for ease of preparation and handling, and thus for use in electronic or optical devices, as well as other applications.
The above examples indicate that tri-coordinated and tetracoordinated boron compounds are promising materials for different NLO applications. The lack of stability presented by the three-coordinated compounds was surpassed by the introduction of bulky groups such as B(Mes)2 groups.
In this revision we have not addressed the group of compounds based on boron clusters since a comprehensive analysis of their nonlinear properties are out of the scope of this review. The readers are referred to the work published by Gao and Hosmane [39] and Nuñez and co-workers [40] for excellent overviews on the topic. Instead we have selected two reports on metallacarboranes that describe the supramolecular structure and its relationship with NLO response.
In 2014, Ma and co-workers [41] reported a DFT analysis of how the redox-driven, switchable, rotatory movement of a series of nickel metallacarboranes can be regulated through second-order nonlinear optical properties. Figure 19 depicts graphically that the computed properties (axial rotation energy, redox pair potential and second-order hyperpolarizability) are substituent dependent in such a way that when electron donation increases in the substituted boron vertexes, the energy required to rotate the metallacarborane portion decreases, the redox potential decreases also, and the second-order response increases (Table 1). This result provides a strong rational design for tuning and enhancing NLO properties in these species.
The interesting work by Gassin and collaborators [42] ponders on the close relationship between interfacial properties of dispersed systems and their potential NLO responsiveness. It is well known that a surfactant is an amphiphilic solute that at certain concentration stabilizes its content in solution by saturating the interphase between two media. Usually, when we refer to this kind of compound we talk about species with two clear portions differentiated by polarity (one portion being hydrophilic and polar, and the other portion of hydrophobic nature), although rare, there is the case of some cobalt metallacarboranes, which in neutral form possess no interfacial properties, but when deprotonated to the anionic form, they behave like surfactants. Knowing the surfactant-like behavior of the cobalt-coordinated dimetallacarborane (COSAN) anion (Figure 20), Gassin tested different solutions at concentrations of 0 mM, 0.06 M and 5.0 mM. SHG was measured in these solutions, varying the geometric dispositions of the fundamental frequency finding different second-order responses that depend on the orientation. This is indicative of a preferential supramolecular array, in which the COSAN anion molecules form a layer of axially arranged dimetallacarboranes. Adsorption isotherms determined for the COSAN solutions provided further insight on the interfacial arrangement, evidencing that certain axial anionic repulsion was taking place. With all these facts, it was proposed that the driving force for this supramolecular arrangement was the presence of dihydrogen bonds, as depicted in Figure 20. This study is an example of a somewhat overlooked application of NLO properties: The second-order response as means to elucidate structural problems of fundamental supramolecular chemistry.

2.2. Third-Order NLO Properties

In the first half of 1990, boron compounds with NLO properties were studied carefully and systematically in terms of second-order hyperpolarizability (β), to understand the correlation between electronic and NLO properties.
Concise examples of these discoveries were the electron-acceptor character of trivalent boron due to the presence of an empty p-orbital which, combined with a π-bridged structure having an electron-donating group, such as an amine, formed a dipolar “push-pull” architecture with important electronic communication along the structure [23,43], as depicted in Figure 21.
The other main design used for boron nonlinear optics resulted in what could be called an electronic umpolung [44], since the character of boron was reversed to be used as an electron-donor, rendering it tetravalent by adding an electron-accepting group. The design maintained a π-bridge of varying length [45], as shown in Figure 21.
At the end of the 1990, TPA-responsive organic structures without boron were synthesized using two main designs: (1) A strong dipolar “push-pull” structure (as mentioned before) and (2) a quadrupolar structure to enhance TPA. Examples of these approaches can be found in the study reported by Reinhardt and co-workers [46] where both architectures were explored; using benzothiazole and substituted diphenylamines as electron-donor moieties, bi-thiophene and fluorene derivatives as π-bridges and a pyridine unit as the electron-acceptor (Figure 22). The only drawback is the modest σTPA values which barely surpass 115 GM in contrast with the synthetic difficulty.
In 1996 Yuan et al. [47], reported the synthesis of a series of symmetric bis(dimesitylboryl) compounds and studied their second order hyperpolarizabilities (γ) by third harmonic generation (THG) at 1.907 μm.
Compound B45 provided a larger γ value (229 × 10−36 esu) than C-18, which has a very similar architecture (Figure 23). This is attributed to enhancement of the π-conjugation pathway due to the empty p-orbital on boron.
The enhancement of γ was achieved by increasing the length of the π-conjugation for both symmetric and unsymmetrical molecules. The MeS group was much more efficient than MeO for enhancing γ. Unsymmetrical “push-pull” organoboranes gave rise to large γ values (Figure 24).
The γ values in these boron compounds increase dramatically as the π-conjugation length increases. For unsymmetrical compounds, when comparing B47 γ = 24 × 10−36 esu, B48 γ = 32 × 10−36 esu, and B49 γ = 23 × 10−36 esu with B60 γ = 93 × 10−36 esu, B58 γ = 81 × 10−36 esu and B59 γ = 54 × 10−36 esu, the effect of the additional vinyl moiety is clearly greater for the strongest π-donor (NMe2) group.
By enhancing the charge transfer capabilities within the quadrupole architectures, Albota et al. [48] targeted TPA-efficient compounds by synthesizing molecules having the two different D-π-A-π-D and A-π-D-π-A topologies. Following this strategy, they reached σTPA values in the range of 600–3700 GM (Figure 25).
Belfield et al. [49] synthesized “push-pull” molecules with different donating substituents, that exhibit σTPA of 650 and 1300 GM (Figure 26).
At the beginning of the century, there was renewed interest in the electron-acceptor character of trivalent boron, with a special focus on the dimesitylboron group.
Several organoboron compounds were investigated with the aim of designing new materials with potential application in two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF). Sensors and imaging are the most targeted application for these materials, although applications in materials science were also envisioned during the early 2000s.
Chujo et al. [50], synthesized π-conjugated low molecular weight polymers, that exhibited strong photoluminescence. The compounds have a structure related to poly-p-phenylene vinylene with boron in the polymer chain and were prepared by hydroboration of aromatic and heteroaromatic diynes with mesitylborane. Compound B67 based on diethynylbenzene displayed third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility χ(3) = 6.87 × 10−6 esu, more than a thousand times larger than that of all-trans-polyacetylene, as measure by four-wave mixing (Figure 27).
Liu et al. reported some of the most remarkable examples of these approaches both at the structural and synthetic level [51,52,53] between 2002 and 2004. These contributions illustrate the transition from the molecular architectures explored during the previous decade that worked to increase boron NLO second-order properties as well as from the general NLO design behind organic dipolar and quadrupolar topologies, all the way towards the fusion of both, to get to NLO, third-order, boron-including chemical structures with potential application due to their fluorescent properties.
Beginning with the dipolar structure, Liu examined different donors, and concluded that dimethylamino and diethylamino share, to a degree, the same donor character while carbazolyl and diphenylamino groups are above in the series. Two different π-bridges were explored to determine whether phenyl or thienyl are capable of delocalizing and connecting in a better way the two ends of the dipolar groups. Interestingly, when there is a dipolar architecture of this kind containing a phenyl, it was possible to reach up to 300 GM of σTPA for TPA (Figure 28).
When considering thiophene as an extension of the π-conjugation, Liu reported that the value of σTPA reached 239 GM, surpassing the properties of carbazole as a donor. This phenomenon proved the weak-donor character of thiophene along with its usual role as π-bridge. Another aspect is that changing the organoboron portion for a somewhat weak donor as benzothiazole to form a quadrupolar structure leads to a larger decrease in σTPA compared to a dipolar architecture.
Nowadays it is considered that multipolar structures will present better σTPA, provided they have an adequate design that allows interaction of the dipoles that leads to a good charge transfer.
The quadrupolar structures depicted in Figure 29 were synthesized and their photophysical properties were measured to compare molecular architectures of the type Donor-π-Donor with systems of the kind Acceptor-π-Acceptor, containing trivalent boron species. Another factor studied was the length of the π-system with one and two styryl units as π-bridge. This study demonstrated that π -conjugation is a key factor for attaining better TPA. In the particular case of the studied molecules, lengthening the π-bridge had a tenfold increase of the σTPA. This reasoning paved the way to build the molecule depicted in Figure 29 which presented an enhancement of 30 times its σTPA, compared to the species with one styryl unit as π-bridge.
This architecture provides two somewhat strong dipoles at each end of the molecule (knowing that thiophene works as a weak donor), but the same thienyl portions have a second function to elongate the π-conjugation, combining in a remarkable manner both properties of that heterocycle.
Theoretical studies on this kind of systems (D-π-D and A-π-A motifs) by Tao et al. [54] provided information on the influence of changing the direction of electron density in quadrupolar architectures, as well as the effect of increasing the length of the π-conjugated system, establishing it as a function of the difference in dipole moments for the two-photon transition alongside charge redistribution within the donor or acceptor portions of the molecules. Having a large difference in dipole moment from the ground state to the excited state leads to a huge contrast in the atomic charges in the diphenylamino or diarylboron portions of the molecules.
In the early 2000s two contributions on the same kind of boron-based ligands but with two different applications were reported. On the one hand, Halik et al. [55] made use of the 1,3-dioxo ligand as acceptor unit to absorb two photons and through this photophysical process reduce and carry out the deposition of silver. The species used for this purpose, depicted in Figure 30, showed acceptable σTPA values, reaching up to 547 GM.
The second series of molecules synthesized through this kind of ligands is that of Cogné-Laage et al. [56]. Mimicking the structural motif of boron dipyrromethene (BODIPY), a series of diaroyl(methanato)boron complexes were synthesized and their TPA response was examined. According to the authors, the advantage of these complexes is the strength of the B–O bond which is less labile to hydrolysis than the B–N bond in BODIPYs.
The molecular architectures reported feature a quadrupolar design of the A-π-A type. Even though tetravalent boron is considered an electron-donor moiety, its coordination modes entail a strong electron density deficiency on the ligands, especially when connected through a π-bridge to a donor portion. This behavior distinguished organoboron from boron complexes from an electronic and structural standpoint. The molecular assortment proved having moderate NLO properties of 5–85 GM for σTPA values. Interestingly, one of the synthesized species reached 200 GM, this compound is depicted in Figure 31.
In 2006, Yuan et al., [57] synthesized and studied the nonlinear properties of a series of air-stable, conjugated dimesitylboranes (p-R-phenyl)dimesitylboranes substituted with various donor and acceptor groups: (E)-[2-(p-R-phenyl)ethenyl]dimesityl-boranes, (E)-[2-(2-thienyl)]dimesityl-borane and (E)-[2-(o-carboranyl)ethenyl]dimesitylborane. The first and second order molecular hyperpolarizabilities, determined by EFISH at 1.907 μm in CHCl3 and THG measurements, revealed that compounds having strong R-substituent donors have the largest β. Hyperpolarizability values for these compounds were obtained from AM1 calculations with the exception of (E)-[2-(2-thienyl)]dimesityl-borane and (E)-[2-(o-carboranyl)ethenyl]dimesitylborane, and are in reasonable agreement with those determined experimentally, as well as with several hypothetical compounds containing multiple C=C bonds. The 2-(p-R-phenyl)ethenyl]- and (p-R-phenylethynyl)dimesitylboranes showed larger β values than the analogous (p-R-phenyl)dimesitylboranes. The authors conclude that the increases in β for (E)-[2-(p-R-phenyl)ethenyl]dimesitylboranes compared to (p-R-phenylethynyl)dimesitylboranes may be due to larger changes in dipole moment in going from the ground to the excited state for the ethenyl derivatives.
THG measurements of γexp at 1.907 μm showed again that (E)-[2-(p-R-phenyl)ethenyl]-dimesitylboranes and (p-R-phenylethynyl)dimesitylboranes have much larger γexp values than the analogous (p-R-phenyl)dimesitylboranes, as shown in Figure 32.
During the second part of the 2000s, Hayek et al. [58,59] and Nicoud et al. [60] introduced a new mode of delocalization of the type π–σ–π by using two boron and nitrogen containing heterocycles, alongside the now well established quadrupolar architecture. The systems used consisted of the 4-membered cyclodiborazane and the 6-membered pyrazabole. In both fragments, B–N sigma bonds are present and the cycles linked to the π-system, render the ring a delocalizing portion as well (as seen in Figure 33).
Analysis of the development of boron-based complexes to improve their photophysical properties, lead Hayek et al. to a pioneering, tandem theoretical-experimental approach where computational methods are used to explain atomistically the photophysical properties observed. By portraying the molecular orbitals involved in the main transitions that give origin to the absorption phenomenon, it is possible to visualize how the charge transfer increases in the NLO process for the 4-membered cyclodiborazane, in accordance with the σTPA value of 1350 GM shown by B108.
It is important to mention that the pyrazabole family of compounds has been used in bioimaging of HeLa cells using a concentration of 10−6 M in DMSO, showing clear fluorescent staining of vesicles in the cytoplasm using laser power values up to 15 mW.
A study by Ramos-Ortiz et al. of the NLO response [61] of a boron-imine complex formed by condensation between aminophenol and dimethylamino cinnamaldehyde (Figure 34), along with a crystal structure analysis of the packing and supramolecular interactions gave a moderate σTPA value similar to other reported molecules, which are more structurally complex.
In the last years, the development of TPA responsive boron-based compounds became multidisciplinary, increasing the knowledge of photophysical properties of the synthesized compounds as well as their applications.
It should be pointed out that TPA literature on BODIPY species is not included in the present work since this family of compounds has been extensively studied through the last 20 years.
To focus on the contributions of these last years to the field of TPA-responsive boron-based complexes, we have selected only some advancements of organoboron species in the field of NLO. These compounds have recently been reviewed by Ji and co-workers [38] providing an excellent overview of the knowledge within the field of trivalent organoboron species in the last 20 years and covering in detail the different applications of this chemical family, including an NLO section.
At the beginning of the decade, the tetravalent quadrupolar architectures were studied again by Li and co-workers [62] who synthesize a ligand based on a diazo dye. Reduction of the diazo group gave rise to a compound with tautomeric equilibrium, which is favored by the H-bonding present between the pyridine and the di-aza portion of the molecule. Coordination with BF2 to form the boron complex, leads to the compounds depicted in Figure 35. Although having a moderate σTPA value of 100 GM, computational calculations revealed that charge transfer was suppressed by coordinating with BF2 due to the fact that the HOMO–LUMO transition for the ligand shows better charge transfer from the pyridine portion to the H-bonded complementary subsystem. This is the main reason why the TPA measurements provide only a modest value for the photophysical property.
Jadhav et al. reinvestigated the pyrazabole core coupling this heterocycle to a series of π-spacers with ferrocene at the end to produce a number of molecules with the D-π-A-π-D architecture [63].
From the no-π-spacer species to a set of phenylene derivatives, the photophysical and electrochemical properties were assessed to evidence the potential applicability of the synthesized compounds (as depicted in Figure 36). The results showed that the compounds with ethinyl-phenyl and the one with diethinyl-phenylene as substituents connecting the pyrazabole and ferrocene portions, presented the best σTPA values when testing their TPA responsiveness, providing values of 831 and 1016 GM, respectively. This is in accordance with the delocalization pattern present in the molecules. As the π-conjugation increases, the TPA response increases too. In addition, changing the direction of the delocalization affects importantly the magnitude of the σTPA.
Finally, it is important to address the contribution of D’Aléo’s group revisiting the hydroxyketone functionality coordinated to a BF2 moiety exploited during the early 2000s by Halik [55], Cogné-Laage [56], D’Aléo [64], Lanoë [65] and Kamada [66] in three separate studies.
Using curcuminoid derivatives, D’Aleo was able to tune this substituents into pseudoquadropolar architectures and actual quadrupoles that exhibited a TPA response. Besides having these two electron-donating-substitution differences, the direction of electron density is changed by varying the angle of the two dipoles assembled within the molecules.
The molecules in Figure 37 evidence the effect of different electron-donating groups and how rigidity of the conjugation is the key to reach high σTPA values. The best results are obtained with nitrogen donors while the efficiency is reduced when using sulfur and finally oxygen. Additionally, a change in symmetry from quadrupolar to dipolar importantly reduces the TPA response.
Another way to affect the TPA response is to change the angle at the quadrupole. The three V-shaped quadrupolar boron complexes depicted in Figure 38, show decreased values of σTPA. This is important evidence to consider because when TPA response is the goal, then the quadrupolar and linear molecular architecture with good rigid donors should be chosen. Additionally, having V-shaped compounds with moderate σTPA values opened the possibility for different applications, for example, greater viability to obtain crystalline solids, which show fluorescent properties. This could lead to new developments in boron-based emitting solids.
These two studies approach the problem of how the electron density distributes, through quantum-level computations and allows to visualize the way charge transfer proceeds via HOMO–LUMO from the ligands to the tetravalent boron moiety of the molecules. They also highlight the importance of an atomistic and electronic point of view that provides a connection between the design, the synthesis, the way the molecules interact electronically and the applications they present.

3. NLO properties in Organotin Compounds and Tin Complexes

3.1. Second-Order NLO Properties

In 1991, Mingos et al. [67] reported the first examples of SHG in organotin compounds for 16 organotin(IV) derivatives with trisubstituted catecholato ligands (Figure 39), for which the SHG intensity in solid state was measured at 1.064 and 1.907 μm compared to urea (Table 2).
These materials can be classified in three groups: The first group shows larger SHG efficiency at 1.064 μm than at 1.907 μm (Sn2 and Sn5) and it corresponds to a resonance effect when the double frequency gets close to the energy of the charge transfer transition; the second group shows larger SHG efficiency at 1.907 μm than at 1.064 μm (Sn6 and Sn11), this is due to residual absorption observed at 532 nm reducing the efficiency at 1064 nm; the third group in which the efficiencies observed at 1.064 and 1.907 μm (Sn3) are the same.
Although it is difficult to fully rationalize the data gathered in Table 2, there is a trend for enhanced efficiency when electron-acceptor groups are present. This is consistent with an overall donating capability associated to the “SnO6” core.
In 1994, Lequan et al. [68,69] studied the effect of the length of the electronic conjugation pathway on the first hyperpolarizability (β) for four organotin compounds with octupolar geometry. Owing to the apolar character of the octupolar species, the EFISH technique commonly used for β measurements, had to be replaced by the alternative HRS (Hyper-Rayleigh Scattering). As shown in Table 3, β increases with an increase in the conjugation length.
In 2000, Fiorini et al. [70] studied an analog of compound Sn19. Using an all-optical orientation experimental setup, Fiorini studied dynamics and symmetry in PMMA (Poly(methyl methacrylate) rods; observing that under all-optical poling conditions, cis/trans isomerization of the azobenzene moieties proceeds to an efficient molecular reorientation that leads to a SHG response.
In 2004, Farfán and Lacroix et al. [71] published four diorganotin compounds with “push-pull” structures (Figure 40) for which β was measured and compared to its related diorganoborates [30].
The X-ray diffraction study showed that the torsion angle between the methoxyphenyl and the nitrophenyl moieties is 8.1° in the diorganotin compound and 11.4° for the diethylamino and increases to 31.2° in the organoboron compound, additionally the structure reveals a planarity in the C–C=N–C connecting bridge, imposed by the diorganotin fragment. This increased planarity results in a better delocalization over the π-conjugated structure and an increase in the β value equal to 80% and 36% for the methoxy and dimethylamino derivatives (Table 4), respectively.
During 2006, two main contributions on NLO properties of diorganotin compounds were highlighted. On the one hand, analysis of a series of organotin coordination compounds of complex structure with a polyoxotungstate ligand carried out by Guand and co-workers [72] highlighted the relevance of theoretical studies (Figure 41).
Through quantum calculations, Guan was able to determine that the charge transfer along a preferred axis of the molecules is of chief importance for NLO response. This study points out three main factors in which NLO properties are tuned: (1) Size of a heavy heteroatom in the structure (Ge gives the best); (2) lengthening of the conjugation in the organotin portion; and (3) the presence of an electron–acceptor at the end of this same moiety to enhance the charge transfer capabilities, as determined by calculating dipole polarizabilities and analyzing the frontier orbital contour plots for the complexes.
That same year, Farfán and Lacroix reported a series of tin-based complexes coordinated to chiral aminoalcohols [73] and chiral aminoacids [74] through the synthesis of Schiff bases (Figure 42). These synthetically accessible coordination compounds were studied through different aspects. First of all, the crystal structures proved the viability to obtain these complexes as non-centrosymmetric solids, which is a main factor to consider for second-order NLO applications in the solid state.
The introduction of a chiral moiety is the only strategy that guarantees a non-centrosymmetric space group in the solid state, which is one of the parameter required for χ(2) (quadratic susceptibility in Equation (2)). This study provided a unique example of a series of molecules with the same NLO response arising from the Et2N to C=N charge transfer unit present in all cases, that crystallize in the same chiral space group, and has the same asymmetric unit cell content. The results allowed to propose a correlation between the solid state SHG response and a molecular geometrical parameter defined as the “degree of chirality” dχ, in Figure 43.
At the end of the decade, Kumar and co-workers [75] obtained a pseudocage, oxygen-bridged organotin complex (Figure 44) and performed a thorough structural analysis of the crystalline solid obtained. A computational approach on this complex indicated a clear HOMO–LUMO-based charge transfer transition from the periphery of the ligands to the pseudocage formed by the tin and oxygen atoms. As a final part of this study, computational calculations of four analogues and prediction of their second-order NLO properties, revealed that changing the ligands to a multipolar architecture containing two strong electron donors would function as the best candidate to express NLO responsiveness.
In 2014, Farfán and Santillan et al. [76] reported six hexacoordinated organotin compounds (Figure 45) with NLO properties; Table 5 shows a trend for the β × μ product which decreases in the order: Sn(Ph)2 (Sn37) > Sn(n-Bu)2 (Sn36) > Sn(Me)2 (Sn35).
In 2015, Şirikci et al. [77] performed a theoretical study on five organotin(IV) compounds (Figure 46) previously reported [78,79,80,81], in which they computed several constants (HOMO–LUMO, polarizabilities, geometric parameters, 1H and 13C-NMR chemical shifts, chemical reactivity descriptors) through DFT using seven different functionals. This investigation was carried out to examine which functional describes more adequately a certain parameter in this type of organotin complexes.
In their work, Şirikci determined the theoretical static second-order hyperpolarizability (β) in chloroform observing the same trend whatever the functional used, Sn41 < Sn38 < Sn40 < Sn42 < Sn39 and obtained values in the range of 4.25–13.40 × 10−30 esu. However, when the non-hybrid functionals HTCH and TPSSTPSS were used the trend was reversed for Sn39 and Sn42, as shown in Figure 47.
A series of chalcogenides was reported by Dehnen et al. [82,83] in 2016, where the organic ligand was interchanged by methyl (Sn43), 1-naphthyl (Sn44), p-styryl (Sn45) and phenyl (Sn45a) (Figure 48); to understand the role of the substituents in SHG.
In the solid state, a strong SHG signal was observed for the chalcogenides containing the methyl and 1-naphthyl substituents, while a strong white-light emission was observed for the p-styryl and phenyl substituents. From this, it was inferred that Sn43 and Sn44 must be highly ordered in the solid state as compared to Sn45 and Sn45a (due to the intrinsic requirements for SHG). Indeed, the small methyl group and its lack of flexibility could increase the ordering in the solid state for compound Sn43; for compound Sn44 the naphthyl ligand produces π–π stacking which apparently induces high ordering too.
For the chalcogenide with naphthyl as ligand, supramolecular stacking is favored, this order yields a crystalline phase which is non-centrosymmetric and SHG responsive. In the case of phenyl and styryl as substituents, the order decreases because dispersive interactions surpass π–π stacking. Losing the non-centrosymmetric arrangement but keeping the electron delocalization in the long π-system makes more plausible the bremsstrahlung effect [84,85] producing the white supercontinuum observed in the emission spectra, which corresponds not only to the remains of the second-order effect but also to the appearance of other nonlinear contributions due to the bremsstrahlung.
In 2016, Dang et al. [86] reported the NH(CH3)3SnX3 (X = Cl, Br) orthorhombic hybrid perovskite single crystal. The distorted pyramidal structure of tin (SnX3) generated asymmetry in the NH(CH3)3SnX3 unit. The acentric crystal allowed to study its powder SHG for both compounds, which at 1064 nm shows a signal 1–2.5 times vs. KDP; further measurements proved that the SHG intensity depends on the particle size, when its size increases the SHG signal decreases, showing that they are not type-1 phase matchable materials [87]. With an increase of temperature, the SHG intensity decreases during the phase transition. The change of SHG was reversible showing overlapping curves in the cooling and heating runs.

3.2. Third-Order NLO Properties

In 1999, Sing et al. [88] reported for the first time five tin(IV) porphyrins complexes with different axial ligands attached to the metallic center having third order NLO properties at 802 nm. In these compounds, the measured values of γ were negative indicating a self-defocusing character; and γ increases as the electron donating capacity of the axial ligand decreases (Figure 49).
The enhanced γ value for Sn50 (X = I) is a result of the strong interaction between the soft acid Sn(IV) in the porphyrin and the soft base I. This interaction increases the electron density in the porphyrin core which normally enhances the hyperpolarizability as confirmed by the UV–Vis Q band of the porphyrins that shows a bathochromic shift following the same trend as γ.
Rao and Kiram et al. [89,90] reported the non-linear absorption (NLA) properties for five oligomers of tin(IV) porphyrins (two are shown in Figure 50) and their correlation with TPA and excited state absorption (ESA). The results for these systems indicate that the ratio of the excited and ground state cross sections (σExg, Table 6) are large enough to promote ESA.
The lifetimes of the highest excited singlet state (τS) for these oligomers of porphyrins are far more rapid than intersystem crossing (τISC), as expected, however because the lifetime of S1 is close to the laser pulse width and the fluorescence quantum yield is low, some of the molecules seem to transfer to T1. The σTPA obtained are in the range of 2.7–396 × 10−4 GM, the largest one is 396 × 10−4 GM for the trimer Sn54 which is 146 times larger than the monomer Sn51. This can be rationalized as a result of photoinduced electron transfer (PET), excitation energy transfer (EET) and trans-axial energy transfer processes which occur simultaneously in these oligomers, leading to a higher delocalized singlet excited state enhancing the TPA assisted by ESA (which is also improved by the resonance of the excitation wavelength with the Q band).
As in porphyrins, tin phthalocyanines (Figure 51) also shows NLA with a good ratio σExg making them able to promote ESA and enhance reverse saturation (RSA) which is suitable for optical limiting (OL).
Wöhrle et al. [91,92] reported a series of tin(IV) and Ge(IV) phthalocyanines that were studied both in solution and in thin films of polymers to enhance their OL properties (Figure 51). Comparing the free base with its respective germanium(IV) and tin(IV) phthalocyanine, β is larger when a metallic center is present, and it is even larger for the tin complexes. These results correlate with the size of the metallic center (heavy atom effect).
Comparison of the electronic effect of the substituents in different positions [93] of the phthalocyanine shows, that there is a considerable increase in β, σTPA and Im{χ(3)} (Im{χ(3)} is the imaginary part of the third order hyperpolarizability) for the α position compared to β position (Table 7). This is attributed to a less polarizable electronic structure for the β isomer, also it is known that the substituents located at the α position have more influence in the electronic distribution of the phthalocyanine than those in the β position [94].
When comparing the different substituents there is not a considerable change in β in the case of the aldehyde or the nitro group, but for the t-butyl β is larger. This is explained by the increase of the polarization towards the metallic center in terms of a better electron-donating group (Table 7).
In the case of the fully halogenated phthalocyanines, there is a noticeable trend when the axial ligand changes from chlorine (Sn62) to fluorine (Sn63), as in the porphyrins reported by Sing [88], this is related to the electronegativity of the ligands and the interaction of an even harder acid (F) with a soft base (SnIV). Not surprisingly, the best in this series is the perfluorinated phthalocyanine due to the well-known mesomeric effect of the fluorine in contrast to the inductive effect of the chlorine.
Organostannoxanes have also proved to be efficient for NLO. Tian et al. reported a series of organostannoxanes derived from phenothiazine [95], triphenylamine [96], coumarin [97] and cinnamic acid [98]. These compounds exhibit TPA values in the range of 680–850 nm, which are mostly part of the infrared region. In the solid state, the diphenyl tin derivatives usually remain as a discrete structure due to the bulky phenyl groups (Figure 52), however, for the dibutyl tin (Figure 53), it is very common to find them as dimeric [71,99], hexameric [100] or even 3D networks [101], as in the case of these organostannoxanes.
Two-photon microscopy (TPM) has become a promising technique for biomedical research [102,103,104,105], Kim and Cho suggested that chromophores suitable for TPA applications should have (1) two-photon brightness (σTPA × Φ) larger than 50 GM [103] or (2) σTPA/MW (GM g−1·mol−1) larger than 1 [106].
Considering the above, only Sn69 (61 a GM, 89 b GM) and Sn70 (69 b GM, 95 c GM) meet the first requirement; the second requirement is fulfilled only by Sn66 (1.06 b GM g−1·mol−1), Sn67 (1.93 b GM g−1·mol−1), Sn68 (2.64 b GM g−1·mol−1), Sn69 (3.83 c GM g−1·mol−1) and Sn70 (3.99 c GM g−1·mol−1) (Table 8). This could make them suitable for bioimaging.
These compounds, as in other tin derivatives, also present biological activity; the derivatives from triphenylamine [96] are cytotoxic against A549 (lung cancer) and MDA-MB-231 (breast cancer) cell lines; the derivatives from coumarin [97] are active against Hela (cervical cancer), HepG2 (liver cancer), A549 and they proved to be better than cisplatin, inducing apoptosis by reactive oxygen species. The coumarin [107] derivative showed higher antibacterial activity against Bacillus subtilis than Kanamycin.
Li et al. [108] reported the study of tetrachloro (1,10-phenanthroline-N,N’) tin(IV) listed in Table 9 and their NLO properties.
Diorganotin Schiff bases are another type of tin derivatives capable of third order NLO properties. Peon et al. [109] described a series of diphenyl tin(IV) Schiff bases (Figure 54), the fluorescence in these complexes are up to 50 times larger than the free base due to the rigidity imposed by the tin center.
Increasing the conjugation of the system, should lead to a bathochromic shift in the UV–Vis and an increase in σTPA. As evident from Equation (4), decreasing the energy of the main transition associated to the TPA (Ege) normally should increase σTPA.
σ T P A 16 π 2 f ( μ e e μ g g ) 2 5 2 c 2 Γ E g e
As expected, the naphthalene derivatives are red shifted in the UV–Vis spectra; also in both derivatives, large red shifts are observed when electron-donating groups are located at the meta position to the imino group, and with electron-withdrawing groups in the para position to the imino. On the other hand, when the electron-withdrawing group is meta to the imino a blue shift is observed.
The two-photon absorption spectra for diphenyl tin(IV) complexes were recorded in ethanol (Figure 55). As expected the naphthalene series shows larger σTPA, indeed the largest in each series is observed for Sn73c and Sn74c (nitro group para to the imino) and Sn74d (methyl meta to the imino).
Muñoz-Flores et al. [110] reported four organotin Schiff compounds with “push-pull” architecture as depicted in Figure 56. The diphenyl tin complexes were thermally more stable than the dibutyl tin complexes, and their decomposition follows the order To: 227 °C (Sn75) > 171 °C (Sn 77) > 96 °C (Sn76) > 95 °C (Sn78). The optical properties were obtained for the different tin complexes in spin-coated polymer films; the UV–Vis spectra of the diethylamino derivatives show a bathochromic shift of about 30 nm with respect to the methoxy derivatives, in full agreement with a better electron-donating capability of the former group. The values observed for χ(3) (Table 10) follow the same trend for the electron-donating capabilities and are in the same order of magnitude obtained for previous tin complexes.
A series of diorganotin Schiff bases derived from fluorene (Figure 57) was reported by Farfán et al. [111], as in the case of other compounds, the fluorene was introduced to enhance the TPA response [112,113,114]. These complexes showed no response to the polarity of the solvent and moderate fluorescence quantum yields.
The TPA spectra for Sn80 was recorded in DMSO, THF and CHCl3 (Table 11). Although the maximum was found at around 750 nm in the three solvents, in chloroform the TPA response is enhanced (Figure 58) and it is possible to observe a second absorption at 1000 nm that is roughly observed in DMSO and THF. This is explained because the two-photon excitation fluorescence comes from the lowest excited state S1 [48] as reported by Peon for this type of complex [109]. In this case, the excited state is accessible through excitation at the bands located around 400 nm and 500 nm in the OPA spectra explaining the presence of the second band.
The complex Sn80 has the largest σTPA (517 GM) of the four derivatives, and of previously diorganotin Schiff bases. Furthermore, its two-photon brightness (σTPA × Φ) is of 150 GM which makes it the best organotin complex suitable for two-photon microscopy (excluding porphyrins or phthalocyanines tin complexes, which show exceptional TPA responses).

Author Contributions

C.C.J. has written Section 2.1. “Second Order NLO for boron compounds”, O.G.-A. has written Section 2.2. “Third Order NLO for boron compounds”, J.O.-H. and P.L.-V. have written Section 3.1. “Second Order NLO for tin compounds”, A.E.-C. has written Section 3.2. “Third Order NLO for boron compounds”, N.F. and R.S. and P.G.L have critically and scientifically revised the original. All authors contributed to the final revision.

Funding

The authors thank CNRS (France), PAIP, PAPIIT IN216616 (UNAM). This work has been realized within the framework of the French-Mexican international laboratory (LIA-LCMMC).

Acknowledgments

The following authors thank CONACyT for the PhD grant: O.G.-A. (239984), A.E.-C. (270200), J.O.-H. (271117) and P.L.-V. (337958).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Suresh, S.; Ramanand, A.; Jayaraman, D.; Mani, P. Review on theoretical aspect of nonlinear optics. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2012, 30, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Maiman, T.H. Optical MASER action in ruby. Br. Commun. Electron. 1960, 7. [Google Scholar]
  3. Maiman, T.H. Stimulated Optical Radiation in Ruby. Nature 1960, 187, 493–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Franken, P.A.; Hill, A.E.; Peters, C.W.; Weinreich, G. Generation of Optical Harmonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1961, 7, 118–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hosmane, N.S. Chapter13: Boron Derivatives for Application in Nonlinear Optics. In Boron Science: New Technologies and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 295–317. ISBN 978-1-4398-2663-8. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rentzepis, P.M.; Pao, Y. Laser-Induced Optical Second Harmonic Generation in Organic Crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1964, 5, 156–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Buckingham, A.D.; Clarke, K.L. Long-range effects of molecular interactions on the polarizability of atoms. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1978, 57, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stahl, R.; Lambert, C.; Kaiser, C.; Wortmann, R.; Jakober, R. Electrochemistry and photophysics of donor-substituted triarylboranes: Symmetry breaking in ground and excited state. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 2358–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kurtz, S.K.; Perry, T.T. A Powder Technique for the Evaluation of Nonlinear Optical Materials. J. Appl. Phys. 1968, 39, 3798–3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oudar, J.L. Optical nonlinearities of conjugated molecules. Stilbene derivatives and highly polar aromatic compounds. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 67, 446–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kanis, D.R.; Ratner, M.A.; Marks, T.J.; Zerner, M.C. Nonlinear Optical Characteristics of Novel Inorganic Chromophores Using the Zindo Formalism. Chem. Mater. 1991, 3, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kanis, D.R.; Ratner, M.A.; Marks, T.J. Design and Construction of Molecular Assemblies with Large Second-Order Optical Nonlinearities. Quantum Chemical Aspects. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 195–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ledoux, I.; Zyss, J. Influence of the molecular environment in solution measurements of the Second-order optical susceptibility for urea and derivatives. Chem. Phys. 1982, 73, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Eaton, D.F. Nonlinear Optical Materials. Science 1991, 253, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Meyers, F.; Marder, S.R.; Pierce, B.M.; Bredas, J.L. Electric Field Modulated Nonlinear Optical Properties of Donor–Acceptor Polyenes: Sum-Over-States Investigation of the Relationship between Molecular Polarizabilities (α, β, and γ) and Bond Length Alternation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10703–10714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pawlicki, M.; Collins, H.A.; Denning, R.G.; Anderson, H.L. Two-Photon Absorption and the Design of Two-Photon Dyes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3244–3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Neckers, D.C.; Jenks, W.S.; Wolff, T. (Eds.) Advances in Photochemistry; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; ISBN 9780470037584. [Google Scholar]
  18. Andraud, C.; Fortrie, R.; Barsu, C.; Stéphan, O.; Chermette, H.; Baldeck, P.L. Excitonically Coupled Oligomers and Dendrimers for Two-Photon Absorption. In Photoresponsive Polymers II; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; Volume 214, pp. 149–203. ISBN 9783540694526. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wakamiya, A.; Yamaguchi, S. Designs of functional π-electron materials based on the characteristic features of boron. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2015, 88, 1357–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Grisdale, P.J.; Williams, J.L.R.; Glogowski, M.E.; Babb, B.E. Boron Photochemistry. VI. The Possible Role of Bridged Intermediates in the Photolysis of Borate Complexes. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 544–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Doty, J.C.; Babb, B.; Grisdale, P.J.; Glogowski, M.; Williams, J.L.R. Donor Acceptor Boron Nitrogen. J. Organomet. Chem. 1972, 38, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yuan, Z.; Taylor, N.J.; Marder, T.B.; Williams, I.D.; Kurtz, S.K.; Cheng, L.-T. Three coordinate phosphorus and boron as π–donor and π–acceptor moieties respectively, in conjugated organic molecules for nonlinear optics: Crystal and molecular structures of E-Ph–CH=CH–B(mes)2, E-4-MeO–C6H4–CH=CH–B(mes)2, and E-Ph2P–CH=CH–B(mes)2 [mes = 2,4,6-Me3C6H2]. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1990, 2, 1489–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lequan, M.; Lequan, R.M.; Ching, K.C. Trivalent Boron as acceptor chromophore in asymmetrically substituted 4,4′-biphenyl and azobenzene for non-linear optics. J. Mater. Chem. 1991, 1, 997–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Singer, K.D.; Garito, A.F. Measurements of molecular second order optical susceptibilities using dc induced second harmonic generation. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 75, 3572–3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yuan, Z.; Taylor, N.J.; Sun, Y.; Marder, T.B.; Williams, I.D.; Cheng, L.-T. Synthesis and second-order nonlinear optical properties of three coordinate organoboranes with diphenylphosphino and ferrocenyl groups as electron donors: Crystal and molecular structures of (E)-D-CH=CH–B(mes)2, and D-C=C–B(mes)2, [D = P(C6H5)2, (η-C5H5)Fe(η-C5H4); mes = 2,4,6-(CH3)3C6H2]. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 449, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Branger, C.; Lequan, M.; Lequan, R.M.; Barzoukas, M.; Fort, A. Boron derivatives containing a bithiophene bridge as new materials for non-linear optics. J. Mater. Chem. 1996, 6, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Branger, C.; Lequan, M.; Lequan, R.M.; Large, M.; Kajzar, F. Polyurethanes containing boron chromophores as sidechains for nonlinear optics. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 272, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lesley, M.J.G.; Woodward, A.; Taylor, N.J.; Marder, T.B.; Cazenobe, I.; Ledoux, I.; Zyss, J.; Thornton, A.; Bruce, D.W.; Kakkar, A.K. Lewis Acidic Borane Adducts of Pyridines and Stilbazoles for Nonlinear Optics. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 1355–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Su, Z.M.; Wang, X.J.; Huang, Z.H.; Wang, R.S.; Feng, J.K.; Sun, J.Z. Nonlinear optical properties for pyridines and stilbazoles adducted by borane. Synth. Met. 2001, 119, 583–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reyes, H.; Muñoz, B.M.; Farfán, N.; Santillan, R.; Rojas-Lima, S.; Lacroix, P.G.; Nakatani, K. Synthesis, crystal structures, and quadratic nonlinear optical properties in a series of push-pull boronate derivatives. J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 12, 2898–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Entwistle, C.D.; Marder, T.B. Boron Chemistry Lights the Way: Optical Properties of Molecular and Polymeric Systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Entwistle, C.D.; Marder, T.B. Applications of Three-Coordinate Organoboron Compounds and Polymers in Optoelectronics. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 4574–4585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yamaguchi, S.; Wakamiya, A. Boron as a key component for new π-electron materials. Pure Appl. Chem. 2006, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lamère, J.F.; Lacroix, P.G.; Farfán, N.; Rivera, J.M.; Santillan, R.; Nakatani, K. Synthesis, characterization and nonlinear optical (NLO) properties of a push-pull bisboronate chromophore with a potential electric field induced NLO switch. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 2913–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Muñoz, B.M.; Santillan, R.; Rodríguez, M.; Méndez, J.M.; Romero, M.; Farfán, N.; Lacroix, P.G.; Nakatani, K.; Ramos-Ortíz, G.; Maldonado, J.L. Synthesis, crystal structure and non-linear optical properties of boronates derivatives of salicylideniminophenols. J. Organomet. Chem. 2008, 693, 1321–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rodríguez, M.; Maldonado, J.L.; Ramos-Ortíz, G.; Lamère, J.F.; Lacroix, P.G.; Farfán, N.; Ochoa, M.E.; Santillan, R.; Meneses-Nava, M.A.; Barbosa-García, O.; Nakatani, K. Synthesis and non-linear optical characterization of novel borinate derivatives of cinnamaldehyde. New J. Chem. 2009, 33, 1693–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Z.; Edkins, R.M.; Nitsch, J.; Fucke, K.; Eichhorn, A.; Steffen, A.; Wang, Y.; Marder, T.B. D-π-A triarylboron compounds with tunable push-pull character achieved by modification of both the donor and acceptor moieties. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ji, L.; Griesbeck, S.; Marder, T.B. Recent developments in and perspectives on three-coordinate boron materials: A bright future. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 846–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gao, S.M.; Hosmane, N.S. Dendrimer- and nanostructure-supported carboranes and metallacarboranes: An account. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2014, 63, 788–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Núñez, R.; Tarrés, M.; Ferrer-Ugalde, A.; de Biani, F.F.; Teixidor, F. Electrochemistry and Photoluminescence of Icosahedral Carboranes, Boranes, Metallacarboranes, and Their Derivatives. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 14307–14378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ma, N.N.; Li, S.J.; Yan, L.K.; Qiu, Y.Q.; Su, Z.M. Switchable NLO response induced by rotation of metallacarboranes [NiIII/IV(C2B9H11)2]−/0 and C-, B-functionalized derivatives. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 5069–5075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gassin, P.M.; Girard, L.; Martin-Gassin, G.; Brusselle, D.; Jonchère, A.; Diat, O.; Viñas, C.; Teixidor, F.; Bauduin, P. Surface activity and molecular organization of metallacarboranes at the air-water interface revealed by nonlinear optics. Langmuir 2015, 31, 2297–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lequan, M.; Lequan, R.M.; Chane-ching, K.; Callier, A.; Barzoukas, M.; Fort, A. Second-Order optical non-linearities of {4-(dimethylamino) stilben Z & E 4′-yl} dimesityl borane. Adv. Mater. Opt. Electron. 1992, 1, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vondung, L.; Alig, L.; Ballmann, M.; Langer, R. Umpolung at Boron: Ancillary-Ligand-Induced Formation of Boron-Based Donor Ligands from Phosphine-Boranes. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 12346–12353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lambert, C.; Stadler, S.; Bourhill, G.; Bräuchle, C. Polarized π-Electron Systems in a Chemically Generated Electric Field: Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties of Ammonium/Borate Zwitterions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 644–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Reinhardt, B.A.; Brott, L.L.; Clarson, S.J.; Dillard, A.G.; Bhatt, J.C. Highly Active Two-Photon Dyes: Design, Synthesis, and Characterization toward Application. Chem. Mater. 1998, 38, 1863–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yuan, Z.; Taylor, N.J.; Ramachandran, R.; Marder, T.B. Third-order nonlinear optical properties of organoboron compounds: Molecular structures and second hyperpolarizabilities. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 1996, 10, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Albota, M. Design of Organic Molecules with Large Two-Photon Absorption Cross Sections. Science 1998, 281, 1653–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Belfield, K.D.; Hagan, D.J.; Van Stryland, E.W.; Schafer, K.J.; Negres, R.A. New Two-Photon Absorbing Fluorene Derivatives: Synthesis and Nonlinear Optical Characterization. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1575–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Matsumi, N.; Chujo, Y. A new class of p-conjugated organoboron polymers. In Contemporary Boron Chemistry; Davidson, M.G., Wade, K., Marder, T.B., Hughes, A.K., Eds.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2000; pp. 51–58. ISBN 978-0-85404-835-9. [Google Scholar]
  51. Liu, Z.; Fang, Q.; Wang, D.; Xue, G.; Yu, W.; Shao, Z.; Jiang, M. Trivalent boron as acceptor in D-π-A chromophores: Synthesis, structure and fluorescence following single- and two-photon excitation. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2900–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, Z.; Fang, Q.; Wang, D.; Cao, D.; Xue, G.; Yu, W.; Lei, H. Trivalent Boron as an Acceptor in Donor-π-Acceptor-Type Compounds for Single- and Two-Photon Excited Fluorescence. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 5074–5084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, Z.-Q.; Fang, Q.; Cao, D.-X.; Wang, D.; Xu, G.-B. Triaryl Boron-Based A-π-A vs. Triaryl Nitrogen-Based D-π-D Quadrupolar Compounds for Single- and Two-Photon Excited Fluorescence. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2933–2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tao, L.-M.; Guo, Y.-H.; Huang, X.-M.; Wang, C.-K. Theoretical studies on two-photon absorption properties of newly synthesized triaryl boron-based A-π-A and triaryl nitrogen-based D-π-D quadrupolar compounds. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 425, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Halik, M.; Wenseleers, W.; Grasso, C.; Stellacci, F.; Zojer, E.; Barlow, S.; Brédas, J.-L.; Perry, J.W.; Marder, S.R. Bis(dioxaborine) compounds with large two-photon cross sections, and their use in the photodeposition of silver. Chem. Commun. 2003, 3, 1490–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cogné-Laage, E.; Allemand, J.-F.; Ruel, O.; Baudin, J.-B.; Croquette, V.; Blanchard-Desce, M.; Jullien, L. Diaroyl(methanato)boron Difluoride Compounds as Medium-Sensitive Two-Photon Fluorescent Probes. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 1445–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Yuan, Z.; Entwistle, C.D.; Collings, J.C.; Albesa-Jové, D.; Batsanov, A.S.; Howard, J.A.K.; Taylor, N.J.; Kaiser, H.M.; Kaufmann, D.E.; Poon, S.-Y.; et al. Synthesis, Crystal Structures, Linear and Nonlinear Optical Properties, and Theoretical Studies of (p-R-Phenyl)-, (p-R-Phenylethynyl)-, and (E)-[2-(p-R-Phenyl)ethenyl]dimesitylboranes and Related Compounds. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 2758–2771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hayek, A.; Nicoud, J.-F.; Bolze, F.; Bourgogne, C.; Baldeck, P.L. Boron-Containing Two-Photon-Absorbing Chromophores: Electronic Interaction through the Cyclodiborazane Core. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6466–6469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hayek, A.; Bolze, F.; Bourgogne, C.; Baldeck, P.L.; Didier, P.; Arntz, Y.; Mély, Y.; Nicoud, J.-F. Boron Containing Two-Photon Absorbing Chromophores. 2. Fine Tuning of the One- and Two-Photon Photophysical Properties of Pyrazabole Based Fluorescent Bioprobes. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 9112–9119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Nicoud, J.-F.; Bolze, F.; Sun, X.-H.; Hayek, A.; Baldeck, P. Boron-Containing Two-Photon-Absorbing Chromophores. 3.(1) One- and Two-Photon Photophysical Properties of p -Carborane-Containing Fluorescent Bioprobes. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 4272–4278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rodríguez, M.; Castro-Beltrán, R.; Ramos-Ortiz, G.; Maldonado, J.L.; Farfán, N.; Domínguez, O.; Rodríguez, J.; Santillan, R.; Meneses-Nava, M.A.; Barbosa-García, O.; Peon, J. Synthesis and third-order nonlinear optical studies of a novel four-coordinated organoboron derivative and a bidentate ligand. Synth. Met. 2009, 159, 1281–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, H.-J.; Fu, W.-F.; Li, L.; Gan, X.; Mu, W.-H.; Chen, W.-Q.; Duan, X.-M.; Song, H.-B. Intense One- and Two-Photon Excited Fluorescent Bis(BF2) Core Complex Containing a 1,8-Naphthyridine Derivative. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2924–2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Jadhav, T.; Maragani, R.; Misra, R.; Sreeramulu, V.; Rao, D.N.; Mobin, S.M. Design and synthesis of donor–acceptor pyrazabole derivatives for multiphoton absorption. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. D’Aléo, A.; Felouat, A.; Fages, F. Boron difluoride complexes of 2′-hydroxychalcones and curcuminoids as fluorescent dyes for photonic applications. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lanoë, P.-H.; Mettra, B.; Liao, Y.Y.; Calin, N.; D’Aléo, A.; Namikawa, T.; Kamada, K.; Fages, F.; Monnereau, C.; Andraud, C. Theoretical and Experimental Study on Boron β-Diketonate Complexes with Intense Two-Photon-Induced Fluorescence in Solution and in the Solid State. ChemPhysChem 2016, 17, 2128–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kamada, K.; Namikawa, T.; Senatore, S.; Matthews, C.; Lenne, P.F.; Maury, O.; Andraud, C.; Ponce-Vargas, M.; Le Guennic, B.; Jacquemin, D.; et al. Boron Difluoride Curcuminoid Fluorophores with Enhanced Two-Photon Excited Fluorescence Emission and Versatile Living-Cell Imaging Properties. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 5219–5232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lamberth, C.; Machell, J.C.; Mingos, D.M.P.; Stolberg, T.L. Preparation and 2nd harmonic generation properties of tris(pyrocatecholato)stannate(IV) compounds. J. Mater. Chem. 1991, 1, 775–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lequan, M.; Branger, C.; Simon, J.; Thami, T.; Chauchard, E.; Persoons, A. Hyperpolarizability of tetraorganotin compounds determined by the hyper-Rayleigh scattering technique. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 229, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lequan, M.; Branger, C.; Simon, J.; Thami, T.; Chauchard, E.; Persoons, A. First hyperpolarizability of organotin compounds withTd symmetry. Adv. Mater. 1994, 6, 851–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fiorini, C.; Nunzi, J.M.; Raimond, P.; Branger, C.; Lequan, M.; Lequan, R.M. Symmetry of the all-optical orientation dynamics of an octupolar azo-dye salt. Synth. Met. 2000, 115, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Reyes, H.; García, C.; Farfán, N.; Santillan, R.; Lacroix, P.G.; Lepetit, C.; Nakatani, K. Syntheses, crystal structures, and quadratic nonlinear optical properties in four “push-pull” diorganotin derivatives. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 2303–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Guan, W.; Yang, G.; Yan, L.; Su, Z. Prediction of second-order optical nonlinearity of trisorganotin- substituted β-Keggin polyoxotungstate. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 7864–7868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rivera, J.M.; Guzmán, D.; Rodriguez, M.; Lamère, J.F.; Nakatani, K.; Santillan, R.; Lacroix, P.G.; Farfán, N. Synthesis, characterization and nonlinear optical properties in a series of new chiral organotin(IV) Schiff base complexes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2006, 691, 1722–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rivera, J.M.; Reyes, H.; Cortés, A.; Santillan, R.; Lacroix, P.G.; Lepetit, C.; Nakatani, K.; Farfán, N. Second-Harmonic Generation within the P212121 Space Group, in a Series of Chiral (Salicylaldiminato) tin Schiff Base Complexes. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 1174–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kumar, A.; Prasad, R.; Kociok-Köhn, G.; Molloy, K.C.; Singh, N. Synthesis, structure and calculated NLO properties of [(n-Bu)2Sn-μ-O-μ-OH–Sn(n-Bu)2(CH3CO2)]2 and its putative derivatives. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2009, 12, 686–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Muñoz-Flores, B.M.; Santillán, R.; Farfán, N.; Álvarez-Venicio, V.; Jiménez-Pérez, V.M.; Rodríguez, M.; Morales-Saavedra, O.G.; Lacroix, P.G.; Lepetit, C.; Nakatani, K. Synthesis, X-ray diffraction analysis and nonlinear optical properties of hexacoordinated organotin compounds derived from Schiff bases. J. Organomet. Chem. 2014, 769, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Şirikci, G.; Ancın, N.A.; Öztaş, S.G. Theoretical studies of organotin(IV) complexes derived from ONO-donor type schiff base ligands. J. Mol. Model. 2015, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Dey, D.K.; Dey, S.P.; Karan, N.K.; Datta, A.; Lycka, A.; Rosair, G.M. Structural and spectral studies of 3-(2-hydroxyphenylimino)-1-phenylbutan-1-one and its diorganotin(IV) complexes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2009, 694, 2434–2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Öztaş, N.A.; Yenişehirli, G.; Ancin, N.; Öztaş, S.G.; Özcan, Y.; Ide, S. Synthesis, characterization, biological activities of dimethyltin(IV) complexes of Schiff bases with ONO-type donors. Spectrochim. Acta A 2009, 72, 929–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Yenişehirli, G.; Öztaş, N.A.; Şahin, E.; Çelebier, M.; Ancın, N.; Öztaş, S.G. Synthesis, characterization, and in vitro antimicrobial activities of organotin(IV) complexes of Schiff bases with ONO-type donor atoms. Heteroat. Chem. 2010, 21, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Öztaş, S.G.; Şahin, E.; Ancin, N.; Ide, S.; Tüzün, M. Structural and spectral studies of N-(3-hydroxypyridine-2-yl)-5-hydroxysalicylideneimine and its dimethyltin(IV) complex. J. Mol. Struct. 2004, 705, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Rosemann, N.W.; Eußner, J.P.; Dornsiepen, E.; Chatterjee, S.; Dehnen, S. Organotetrel Chalcogenide Clusters: Between Strong Second-Harmonic and White-Light Continuum Generation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 16224–16227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rosemann, N.W.; Eussner, J.P.; Beyer, A.; Koch, S.W.; Volz, K.; Dehnen, S.; Chatterjee, S. A highly efficient directional molecular white-light emitter driven by a continuous-wave laser diode. Science 2016, 352, 1301–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nakel, W. The elementary process of bremsstrahlung. Phys. Rep. 1994, 243, 317–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Haug, E.; Nakel, W. The Elementary Process of Bremsstrahlung; Lecture Notes in Physics; World Scientific Lecture Notes; World Scientific, Toh Tuck Link: Singapore, 2004; Volume 73, ISBN 978-981-238-578-9. [Google Scholar]
  86. Dang, Y.; Zhong, C.; Zhang, G.; Ju, D.; Wang, L.; Xia, S.; Xia, H.; Tao, X. Crystallographic Investigations into Properties of Acentric Hybrid Perovskite Single Crystals NH(CH3)3SnX3 (X = Cl, Br). Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 6968–6974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Eckardt, R.; Reintjes, J. Phase matching limitations of high efficiency second harmonic generation. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1984, 20, 1178–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kandasamy, K.; Shetty, S.J.; Puntambekar, P.N.; Srivastava, T.S.; Kundu, T.; Singh, B.P. Effects of Metal Substitution on Third-order Optical Non-linearity of Porphyrin Macrocycle. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 1999, 3, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kiran, P.P.; Reddy, D.R.; Dharmadhikari, A.K.; Maiya, B.G.; Kumar, G.R.; Rao, D.N. Contribution of two-photon and excited state absorption in “axial-bonding” type hybrid porphyrin arrays under resonant electronic excitation. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 418, 442–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kiran, P.P.; Reddy, D.R.; Maiya, B.G.; Dharmadhikari, A.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Rao, D.N. Nonlinear absorption properties of “axial-bonding” type tin(IV) tetratolylporphyrin based hybrid porphyrin arrays. Opt. Commun. 2005, 252, 150–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Slodeka, A.; Schnurpfeilb, G.; Wöhrle, D. Optical limiting of germanium(IV) and tin(IV) phthalocyanines in solution and polymer matrices and comparison to an indium(III) phthalocyanine. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2017, 21, 811–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Slodek, A.; Wöhrle, D.; Doyle, J.J.; Blau, W. Metal Complexes of Phthalocyanines in Polymers as Suitable Materials for Optical Limiting. Macromol. Symp. 2006, 235, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Louzada, M.; Britton, J.; Nyokong, T.; Khene, S. Solvent Effect on the Third-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties of α- and β-Tertbutyl Phenoxy-Substituted Tin(IV) Chloride Phthalocyanines. J. Phys. Chem. A 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhong, A.; Zhang, Y.; Bian, Y. Structures and spectroscopic properties of nonperipherally and peripherally substituted metal-free phthalocyanines: A substitution effect study based on density functional theory calculations. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2010, 29, 470–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Li, D.; Hu, R.; Zhou, W.; Sun, P.; Kan, Y.; Tian, Y.; Zhou, H.; Wu, J.; Tao, X.; Jiang, M. Synthesis, Structures, and Photophysical Properties of Two Organostannoxanes from a Novel Acrylic Acid Derived from Phenothiazine. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 2009, 2664–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhao, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Zou, Y.; Li, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, H.; Wu, J.; Tian, Y. Synthesis, crystal structures and two-photon absorption properties of triphenylamine cyanoacetic acid derivative and its organooxotin complexes. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Wang, H.; Hu, L.; Du, W.; Tian, X.; Zhang, Q.; Hu, Z.; Luo, L.; Zhou, H.; Wu, J.; Tian, Y. Two-Photon Active Organotin(IV) Carboxylate Complexes for Visualization of Anticancer Action. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 3, 836–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Guan, R.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, M.; Liu, H.; Du, W.; Tian, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, H.; Wu, J.; Tian, Y. Organotin(IV) carboxylate complexes containing polyether oxygen chains with two-photon absorption in the near infrared region and their anticancer activity. Dyes Pigment. 2018, 158, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Farfán, N.; Mancilla, T.; Santillan, R.; Gutiérrez, A.; Zamudio-Rivera, L.S.; Beltrán, H.I. Preference of di-n-butyltinIV compounds to build O⋯Sn bonds in fused rings with five-six members. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 3481–3491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. García-Zarracino, R.; Ramos-Quiñones, J.; Höpfl, H. Self-Assembly of Dialkyltin(IV) Moieties and Aromatic Dicarboxylates to Complexes with a Polymeric or a Discrete Trinuclear Macrocyclic Structure in the Solid State and a Mixture of Fast Interchanging Cyclooligomeric Structures in Solution. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 3835–3845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. García-Zarracino, R.; Höpfl, H. A 3D hybrid network containing large spherical cavities formed through a combination of metal coordination and hydrogen bonding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1507–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Zhu, X.; Zheng, L.; Huang, X.; Wu, J.; Hong, L.; Dong, J.; Zhuo, S.; Chen, J. Nonlinear Optical Microscopy Captures High-Resolution Images of Microstructures within Three Types of Unlabeled Rat Cartilage. IEEE Photonics J. 2016, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kim, H.M.; Cho, B.R. Small-Molecule Two-Photon Probes for Bioimaging Applications. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 5014–5055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Helmchen, F.; Denk, W. Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nat. Methods 2005, 2, 932–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zipfel, W.R.; Williams, R.M.; Webb, W.W. Nonlinear magic: Multiphoton microscopy in the biosciences. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 1369–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Myung Kim, H.; Rae Cho, B. Two-photon materials with large two-photon cross sections. Structure–property relationship. Chem. Commun. 2009, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Hu, L.; Wang, H.; Xia, T.; Fang, B.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Tian, X.; Zhou, H.; Wu, J.; Tian, Y. Two-Photon-Active Organotin(IV) Complexes for Antibacterial Function and Superresolution Bacteria Imaging. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 6340–6348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Hu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Li, T. Crystal structure, Z-scan measurements and theoretical calculations of third-order nonlinear optical properties of tetrachloro(1,10-phenanthroline-N,N′)tin(IV). Synth. Met. 2014, 197, 194–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zugazagoitia, J.S.; Maya, M.; Damiaán-Zea, C.; Navarro, P.; Beltraán, H.I.; Peon, J. Excited-State Dynamics and Two-Photon Absorption Cross Sections of Fluorescent Diphenyl-Tin IV Derivatives with Schiff Bases: A Comparative Study of the Effect of Chelation from the Ultrafast to the Steady-State Time Scale. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 704–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. García-López, M.C.; Muñoz-Flores, B.M.; Chan-Navarro, R.; Jiménez-Pérez, V.M.; Moggio, I.; Arias, E.; Rodríguez-Ortega, A.; Ochoa, M.E. Microwave-assisted synthesis, third-order nonlinear optical properties, voltammetry cyclic and theoretical calculations of organotin compounds bearing push-pull Schiff bases. J. Organomet. Chem. 2016, 806, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Enríquez-Cabrera, A.; Vega-Peñaloza, A.; Álvarez-Venicio, V.; Romero-Ávila, M.; Lacroix, P.G.; Ramos-Ortiz, G.; Santillan, R.; Farfán, N. Two-photon absorption properties of four new pentacoordinated diorganotin complexes derived from Schiff bases with fluorene. J. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 855, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Morales, A.R.; Frazer, A.; Woodward, A.W.; Ahn-White, H.-Y.; Fonari, A.; Tongwa, P.; Timofeeva, T.; Belfield, K.D. Design, Synthesis, and Structural and Spectroscopic Studies of Push–Pull Two-Photon Absorbing Chromophores with Acceptor Groups of Varying Strength. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1014–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Moura, G.L.C.; Simas, A.M. Two-photon absorption by fluorene derivatives: Systematic molecular design. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 6106–6116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Yao, S.; Ahn, H.Y.; Wang, X.; Fu, J.; Van Stryland, E.W.; Hagan, D.J.; Belfield, K.D. Donor–acceptor–donor fluorene derivatives for two-photon fluorescence lysosomal imaging. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 3965–3974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. First observation of the second harmonic generation.
Figure 1. First observation of the second harmonic generation.
Inorganics 06 00131 g001
Figure 2. ”Push-pull” system.
Figure 2. ”Push-pull” system.
Inorganics 06 00131 g002
Figure 3. The relative position of the donor–acceptor groups.
Figure 3. The relative position of the donor–acceptor groups.
Inorganics 06 00131 g003
Figure 4. The effect of the length of the π system on the first-order hyperpolarizability.
Figure 4. The effect of the length of the π system on the first-order hyperpolarizability.
Inorganics 06 00131 g004
Figure 5. Examples of organic materials that have been studied as single crystals for frequency doubling. * Powder Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) vs. urea; β in ×10−30 esu at 1.06 μm; β1: at 1.9 μm.
Figure 5. Examples of organic materials that have been studied as single crystals for frequency doubling. * Powder Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) vs. urea; β in ×10−30 esu at 1.06 μm; β1: at 1.9 μm.
Inorganics 06 00131 g005
Figure 6. Boron in neutral form.
Figure 6. Boron in neutral form.
Inorganics 06 00131 g006
Figure 7. Boron in ionic form.
Figure 7. Boron in ionic form.
Inorganics 06 00131 g007
Figure 8. Boron forming an adduct with nitrogen.
Figure 8. Boron forming an adduct with nitrogen.
Inorganics 06 00131 g008
Figure 9. Main features of three-coordinated boron compounds.
Figure 9. Main features of three-coordinated boron compounds.
Inorganics 06 00131 g009
Figure 10. Second order hyperpolarizabilities for B4 and B5.
Figure 10. Second order hyperpolarizabilities for B4 and B5.
Inorganics 06 00131 g010
Figure 11. Hyperpolarizabilities for compounds with dimesitylboron as acceptor group, bithiophene as the unsaturated chain and as donor groups, pyrrolidine-1-yl and dithienylidene.
Figure 11. Hyperpolarizabilities for compounds with dimesitylboron as acceptor group, bithiophene as the unsaturated chain and as donor groups, pyrrolidine-1-yl and dithienylidene.
Inorganics 06 00131 g011
Figure 12. Polyurethanes having azo-dyes with a dimesityl boron group as an electron acceptor.
Figure 12. Polyurethanes having azo-dyes with a dimesityl boron group as an electron acceptor.
Inorganics 06 00131 g012
Figure 13. Binding Lewis-acidic boranes to stilbazoles.
Figure 13. Binding Lewis-acidic boranes to stilbazoles.
Inorganics 06 00131 g013
Figure 14. “Push-pull” boronates.
Figure 14. “Push-pull” boronates.
Inorganics 06 00131 g014
Figure 15. Molecular switch with NLO properties.
Figure 15. Molecular switch with NLO properties.
Inorganics 06 00131 g015
Figure 16. Schiff bases with second-order NLO properties.
Figure 16. Schiff bases with second-order NLO properties.
Inorganics 06 00131 g016
Figure 17. Hyperpolarizability response after boron complexation.
Figure 17. Hyperpolarizability response after boron complexation.
Inorganics 06 00131 g017
Figure 18. Substitution of the methyl substituents para to the boron atom by electron-withdrawing perfluorophenyl.
Figure 18. Substitution of the methyl substituents para to the boron atom by electron-withdrawing perfluorophenyl.
Inorganics 06 00131 g018
Figure 19. Computed properties of the rotational phenomenon of nickel-coordinated metallacarboranes, whose movement is redox- and NLO-dependent.
Figure 19. Computed properties of the rotational phenomenon of nickel-coordinated metallacarboranes, whose movement is redox- and NLO-dependent.
Inorganics 06 00131 g019
Figure 20. Schematic representation of the interfacial behavior and driving force for supramolecular arrangement of COSAN dimetallacarborane, measured primarily through second-order NLO response.
Figure 20. Schematic representation of the interfacial behavior and driving force for supramolecular arrangement of COSAN dimetallacarborane, measured primarily through second-order NLO response.
Inorganics 06 00131 g020
Figure 21. Boron-based architectures searched for NLO properties during the early 90s. (a) Dipolar design varying π-bridges with trivalent boron as electron acceptor unit; (b) dipolar architecture varying π-bridges with tetravalent boron as donor unit.
Figure 21. Boron-based architectures searched for NLO properties during the early 90s. (a) Dipolar design varying π-bridges with trivalent boron as electron acceptor unit; (b) dipolar architecture varying π-bridges with tetravalent boron as donor unit.
Inorganics 06 00131 g021
Figure 22. Examples of the most widely used molecular architectures TPA during the late 90s.
Figure 22. Examples of the most widely used molecular architectures TPA during the late 90s.
Inorganics 06 00131 g022
Figure 23. Second order hyperpolarizabilities for symmetric dimesitylboranes.
Figure 23. Second order hyperpolarizabilities for symmetric dimesitylboranes.
Inorganics 06 00131 g023
Figure 24. Second order hyperpolarizabilities for unsymmetric dimesitylboranes and NO2 analogous.
Figure 24. Second order hyperpolarizabilities for unsymmetric dimesitylboranes and NO2 analogous.
Inorganics 06 00131 g024
Figure 25. Most promising D-π-A-π-D and A-π-D-π-A molecular topologies in one-dimensional TPA chromophores.
Figure 25. Most promising D-π-A-π-D and A-π-D-π-A molecular topologies in one-dimensional TPA chromophores.
Inorganics 06 00131 g025
Figure 26. Efficient TPA chromophores designed within the dipolar approach.
Figure 26. Efficient TPA chromophores designed within the dipolar approach.
Inorganics 06 00131 g026
Figure 27. Polymer based on diethynylbenzene third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility value.
Figure 27. Polymer based on diethynylbenzene third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility value.
Inorganics 06 00131 g027
Figure 28. Some organoboron species studied during the early 2000s seeking enhanced TPA properties.
Figure 28. Some organoboron species studied during the early 2000s seeking enhanced TPA properties.
Inorganics 06 00131 g028
Figure 29. Quadrupolar organoboron species with different lengths of π-bridges. (a) Quadrupolar architectures varying the direction of electron density and π-bridge length; (b) design for TPA responsive molecule.
Figure 29. Quadrupolar organoboron species with different lengths of π-bridges. (a) Quadrupolar architectures varying the direction of electron density and π-bridge length; (b) design for TPA responsive molecule.
Inorganics 06 00131 g029
Figure 30. Series of compounds used for TPA-mediated photoreduction and deposition of silver.
Figure 30. Series of compounds used for TPA-mediated photoreduction and deposition of silver.
Inorganics 06 00131 g030
Figure 31. Diaroyl(methanato)boron complexes with aromatic portions as donors studied for their TPA responsiveness.
Figure 31. Diaroyl(methanato)boron complexes with aromatic portions as donors studied for their TPA responsiveness.
Inorganics 06 00131 g031
Figure 32. First and second order hyperpolarizabilities of conjugated dimesitylboranes.
Figure 32. First and second order hyperpolarizabilities of conjugated dimesitylboranes.
Inorganics 06 00131 g032
Figure 33. Cyclodiborazane and pyrazabole species developed for their TPA responsiveness.
Figure 33. Cyclodiborazane and pyrazabole species developed for their TPA responsiveness.
Inorganics 06 00131 g033
Figure 34. Scheme for obtaining a TPA-responsive boronate of major structural accessibility and σTPA value.
Figure 34. Scheme for obtaining a TPA-responsive boronate of major structural accessibility and σTPA value.
Inorganics 06 00131 g034
Figure 35. BF2-based, hydrazine-coordinated species of quadrupolar architecture presenting TPA.
Figure 35. BF2-based, hydrazine-coordinated species of quadrupolar architecture presenting TPA.
Inorganics 06 00131 g035
Figure 36. Quadrupolar molecules based on pyrazabole π-bridged with ferrocene.
Figure 36. Quadrupolar molecules based on pyrazabole π-bridged with ferrocene.
Inorganics 06 00131 g036
Figure 37. Quadrupolar BF2-coordinated hydroxyketones.
Figure 37. Quadrupolar BF2-coordinated hydroxyketones.
Inorganics 06 00131 g037
Figure 38. V-shaped boron-based, BF2-coordinated hydroxyketone complexes with TPA response.
Figure 38. V-shaped boron-based, BF2-coordinated hydroxyketone complexes with TPA response.
Inorganics 06 00131 g038
Figure 39. Structure of the catechol tin compounds.
Figure 39. Structure of the catechol tin compounds.
Inorganics 06 00131 g039
Figure 40. Diorganotin and corresponding diorganoboron as representative members of these families of complexes.
Figure 40. Diorganotin and corresponding diorganoboron as representative members of these families of complexes.
Inorganics 06 00131 g040
Figure 41. Theoretical studies of polyoxotungstate-R3Sn for the prediction of second-order NLO response. (Reprinted with permission from [72], Guan, W.; Yang, G.; Yan, L.; Su, Z. Prediction of second-order optical nonlinearity of trisorganotin- substituted β-Keggin polyoxotungstate. Copyright 2006 American Chemical Society.)
Figure 41. Theoretical studies of polyoxotungstate-R3Sn for the prediction of second-order NLO response. (Reprinted with permission from [72], Guan, W.; Yang, G.; Yan, L.; Su, Z. Prediction of second-order optical nonlinearity of trisorganotin- substituted β-Keggin polyoxotungstate. Copyright 2006 American Chemical Society.)
Inorganics 06 00131 g041
Figure 42. Aminoalcohols and aminoacids derived Schiff-base-Tin complexes.
Figure 42. Aminoalcohols and aminoacids derived Schiff-base-Tin complexes.
Inorganics 06 00131 g042
Figure 43. SHG intensities as a function of the degree of chirality (dχ).
Figure 43. SHG intensities as a function of the degree of chirality (dχ).
Inorganics 06 00131 g043
Figure 44. Computationally calculated species for pseudocage, oxo-bridged tin complexes with potential second-order NLO response. (Reprinted from [75], Kumar, A.; Prasad, R.; Kociok-Köhn, G.; Molloy, K.C.; Singh, N. Synthesis, structure and calculated NLO properties of [(n-Bu)2Sn-μ-O-μ-OH–Sn(n-Bu)2(CH3CO2)]2 and its putative derivatives. Copyright 2009, with permission from Elsevier.)
Figure 44. Computationally calculated species for pseudocage, oxo-bridged tin complexes with potential second-order NLO response. (Reprinted from [75], Kumar, A.; Prasad, R.; Kociok-Köhn, G.; Molloy, K.C.; Singh, N. Synthesis, structure and calculated NLO properties of [(n-Bu)2Sn-μ-O-μ-OH–Sn(n-Bu)2(CH3CO2)]2 and its putative derivatives. Copyright 2009, with permission from Elsevier.)
Inorganics 06 00131 g044
Figure 45. Hexacoordinated tin compounds.
Figure 45. Hexacoordinated tin compounds.
Inorganics 06 00131 g045
Figure 46. Organotin compounds investigated by Şirikci et al. [77].
Figure 46. Organotin compounds investigated by Şirikci et al. [77].
Inorganics 06 00131 g046
Figure 47. β obtained for the organotin compounds with different functionals.
Figure 47. β obtained for the organotin compounds with different functionals.
Inorganics 06 00131 g047
Figure 48. Chalcogenides reported by Dehnen et al. (Adapted with permission from [82], Rosemann, N.W.; Eußner, J.P.; Dornsiepen, E.; Chatterjee, S.; Dehnen, S. Organotetrel Chalcogenide Clusters: Between Strong Second-Harmonic and White-Light Continuum Generation. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.)
Figure 48. Chalcogenides reported by Dehnen et al. (Adapted with permission from [82], Rosemann, N.W.; Eußner, J.P.; Dornsiepen, E.; Chatterjee, S.; Dehnen, S. Organotetrel Chalcogenide Clusters: Between Strong Second-Harmonic and White-Light Continuum Generation. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.)
Inorganics 06 00131 g048
Figure 49. Structure of tin(IV) porphyrins with different axial ligands, γ and λmax (nm) values.
Figure 49. Structure of tin(IV) porphyrins with different axial ligands, γ and λmax (nm) values.
Inorganics 06 00131 g049
Figure 50. Sn–Ni2(TTP)3 and Sn2–Zn4(TTP)6 oligomers of porphyrins.
Figure 50. Sn–Ni2(TTP)3 and Sn2–Zn4(TTP)6 oligomers of porphyrins.
Inorganics 06 00131 g050
Figure 51. α- and β- substituted tin(IV) phthalocyanines.
Figure 51. α- and β- substituted tin(IV) phthalocyanines.
Inorganics 06 00131 g051
Figure 52. Some organostannoxanes with TPA properties.
Figure 52. Some organostannoxanes with TPA properties.
Inorganics 06 00131 g052
Figure 53. Some organostannoxanes with TPA properties.
Figure 53. Some organostannoxanes with TPA properties.
Inorganics 06 00131 g053
Figure 54. Diphenyl tin complexes reported by Peon et al. (Adapted with permission from [109]. Zugazagoitia, J.S.; Maya, M.; Damián-Zea, C.; Navarro, P.; Beltrán, H. I.; Peon, J. Excited-State Dynamics and Two-Photon Absorption Cross Sections of Fluorescent Diphenyl-Tin IV Derivatives with Schiff Bases: A Comparative Study of the Effect of Chelation from the Ultrafast to the Steady-State Time Scale. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.)
Figure 54. Diphenyl tin complexes reported by Peon et al. (Adapted with permission from [109]. Zugazagoitia, J.S.; Maya, M.; Damián-Zea, C.; Navarro, P.; Beltrán, H. I.; Peon, J. Excited-State Dynamics and Two-Photon Absorption Cross Sections of Fluorescent Diphenyl-Tin IV Derivatives with Schiff Bases: A Comparative Study of the Effect of Chelation from the Ultrafast to the Steady-State Time Scale. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.)
Inorganics 06 00131 g054
Figure 55. TPA spectra for diphenyl tin(IV) complexes Sn73a–g and Sn74a–g, (Adapted with permission from [109], Zugazagoitia, J.S.; Maya, M.; Damián-Zea, C.; Navarro, P.; Beltrán, H. I.; Peon, J. Excited-State Dynamics and Two-Photon Absorption Cross Sections of Fluorescent Diphenyl-Tin IV Derivatives with Schiff Bases: A Comparative Study of the Effect of Chelation from the Ultrafast to the Steady-State Time Scale. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.)
Figure 55. TPA spectra for diphenyl tin(IV) complexes Sn73a–g and Sn74a–g, (Adapted with permission from [109], Zugazagoitia, J.S.; Maya, M.; Damián-Zea, C.; Navarro, P.; Beltrán, H. I.; Peon, J. Excited-State Dynamics and Two-Photon Absorption Cross Sections of Fluorescent Diphenyl-Tin IV Derivatives with Schiff Bases: A Comparative Study of the Effect of Chelation from the Ultrafast to the Steady-State Time Scale. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.)
Inorganics 06 00131 g055
Figure 56. Diphenyl tin complexes reported by Muñoz-Flores et al. (Reprinted from [110], García-López, M.C.; Muñoz-Flores, B.M.; Chan-Navarro, R.; Jiménez-Pérez, V.M.; Moggio, I.; Arias, E.; Rodríguez-Ortega, A.; Ochoa, M.E. Microwave-assisted synthesis, third-order nonlinear optical properties, voltammetry cyclic and theoretical calculations of organotin compounds bearing push-pull Schiff bases. Copyright 2016, with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 56. Diphenyl tin complexes reported by Muñoz-Flores et al. (Reprinted from [110], García-López, M.C.; Muñoz-Flores, B.M.; Chan-Navarro, R.; Jiménez-Pérez, V.M.; Moggio, I.; Arias, E.; Rodríguez-Ortega, A.; Ochoa, M.E. Microwave-assisted synthesis, third-order nonlinear optical properties, voltammetry cyclic and theoretical calculations of organotin compounds bearing push-pull Schiff bases. Copyright 2016, with permission from Elsevier).
Inorganics 06 00131 g056
Figure 57. Diorganotin complexes derived from fluorene.
Figure 57. Diorganotin complexes derived from fluorene.
Inorganics 06 00131 g057
Figure 58. TPA spectra for Sn80 in different solvents.
Figure 58. TPA spectra for Sn80 in different solvents.
Inorganics 06 00131 g058
Table 1. Measured second-harmonic signals at 1.064 μm and 1.907 μm wavelengths relative to urea.
Table 1. Measured second-harmonic signals at 1.064 μm and 1.907 μm wavelengths relative to urea.
#R1R2R3R4R5R6ΔGrotation aredox bβ (a.u) c
B30HHHHHH−111.8770.13163
B31MeMeMeMeMeMe−113.8740.22120
B32HPhHPhHH−118.4740.421880
B33HPh-OMeHPh-OMeHH−115.7130.306674
B34dHPh-OMePh-OMeHHH−112.7010.174345
B35HHHHPh-OMePh-OMe−110.1910.0620998
a in kcal/mol; b in V; c computed for Ni(IV); d β was also computed for Ni(III) and it is 2903 a.u.
Table 2. Measured second-harmonic signals at 1.064 and 1.907 μm wavelengths relative to urea.
Table 2. Measured second-harmonic signals at 1.064 and 1.907 μm wavelengths relative to urea.
#R2R11.064 μm1.907 μm#R2R11.064 μm1.907 μm
Sn1HH0.40Sn93-MeO3-MeO0.010.03
Sn2H4-NO20.280.17Sn103-MeOH0.080
Sn3H3-MeO0.190.12Sn113-MeO4-NO20.140.32
Sn4H3,4,5,6,4-4Cl0.070.05Sn123-MeO3,4,5,6,4-4Cl00
Sn54-NO24-NO21.330.44Sn133,4,5,6-4Cl3,4,5,6,4-4Cl00
Sn64-NO2H0.140.71Sn143,4,5,6-4ClH00
Sn74-NO23-MeO00Sn153,4,5,6-4Cl4-NO200
Sn84-NO23,4,5,6,4-4Cl00Sn163,4,5,6-4Cl3-MeO00
Table 3. Nonlinear optical properties for the tetraorganotin derivatives.
Table 3. Nonlinear optical properties for the tetraorganotin derivatives.
#Compoundβxzy × 10−30 esu
Sn17Sn(C6H4NMe2)413.0
Sn18Sn(C6H4C6H4NMe2)424
Sn19Sn(C6H4N=NC6H4NMe2)4159
Sn20(C6H5)Sn(C6H4N=NC6H4NMe2)3βzzz = 181
Table 4. Second-order NLO properties for the diorganotin and diorganoborate compounds.
Table 4. Second-order NLO properties for the diorganotin and diorganoborate compounds.
#Rβ × 10−30 esuμ (D)
Sn21OCH348.910.2
B15OCH327.010.2
Sn22NEt2--
B16NEt2--
Table 5. Nonlinear optical properties for the hexacoordinated tin compounds.
Table 5. Nonlinear optical properties for the hexacoordinated tin compounds.
R1β (calc.) aμ (calc.) a,bβ × μ (calc.)β × μ (exp.)
Sn3319.02.0725.7-
Sn35-1.23-14.8
Sn3619.01.3512.048.2
Sn3719.91.6413.256.4
a from DFT calculations in 10−30 esu; b in D.
Table 6. Optical properties of the oligomers described by Rao and Kiram et al. [89,90].
Table 6. Optical properties of the oligomers described by Rao and Kiram et al. [89,90].
#Porphyrinγ aβ bσTPA cσExgτS dτISC dτFl (Φ%) e
Sn51Sn(TTP)0.370.452.73.246010000.56 (71), 1 (28)
Sn52Sn–Sn(TTP)230001.5013.621.537.51800.57 (95), 4.94 (5)
Sn53Sn–(H2)2(TTP)3930--7.265003800.74 (71), 5.93 (28)
Sn54Sn–Ni2(TTP)36101.453966.21505500.62 (70), 2.13 (29)
Sn55Sn2–(H2)4(TTP)6330--19.455002200.45 (28), 1.95 (23), 7.25 (47)
Sn56Sn2–Zn4(TTP)63800.9015.76.73156000.66 (30), 1.73 (69)
a γ in 10−30 esu, b β in 10−9 cm·W−1, c σTPA in 104 GM, d τS and τISC in ps, e τFl in ns; obtained in CHCl3.
Table 7. β, Im{χ(3)} and the ratio σExg for some phthalocyanines.
Table 7. β, Im{χ(3)} and the ratio σExg for some phthalocyanines.
#β aIm{χ(3)} bσExg #β aIm{χ(3)} bσExg
H57c,d1.3n.d.5.7 Sn60e3.93969.62
Sn57d2.9n.d.16.9 Sn61d4.01307.3
H58c2.37.84.3 Sn62f2.68.84.5
Sn58d3.010.010.2 Sn63g1.56.66.0
Sn59e0.91545.14 ----
a β in 10−8 cm·W−1, b Im{χ(3)} in 10−12 esu c free base of Sn57 or Sn58, d in THF, e in toluene, f in DMF, g in 1-chloronaphthalene.
Table 8. Optical properties of the organostannoxanes.
Table 8. Optical properties of the organostannoxanes.
Tin complexTin Source#λabs (nm)λem (nm)#σTPA (GM)
Phenothiazine [95]Ph3SnOHSn64290, 363 a537 a0.37 a53 a
n-Bu2SnOSn65302, 401 a537 a0.20 a223a
Triphenylamine [96]Ph3SnOHSn66289, 414 a565 a0.003 a780 a
n-Bu2SnOSn67289, 426 a553 a0.004 a2500 a
(n-Bu3Sn)2OSn68291, 419 a556 a0.008 a1600 a
Coumarin [97,107]Ph3SnOHSn69449 b, 424 c545 b, 485 c0.025 b, 0.40c2440 b, 222 c
(n-Bu3Sn)2OSn70452 b, 431 c547 b, 489 c0.030 b, 0.33c2300 b, 287 c
Cinnamic acid [98]n-BuSnOHSn71321 d410 d0.009 d426 d
(n-Bu3Sn)2OSn72320 d406 d0.003 d-
a in CH2Cl2, b in phosphate buffered saline 0.02% triton X-100, c in DMF, d in DMSO.
Table 9. Optical properties of tetrachloro (1,10-phenanthroline-N,N’) tin(IV).
Table 9. Optical properties of tetrachloro (1,10-phenanthroline-N,N’) tin(IV).
χ(3)3.6 × 10−12 esu
Re{χ(3)} a3.267 × 10−12 esu
Im{χ(3)}1.512 × 10−12 esu
Γ5.022 × 10−33 esu
Β3.18 × 10−10 cm·W−1
η2 b3.87 × 10−22 esu
a Re{χ(3)} is the real part of the third order hyperpolarizability. b η2 is the nonlinear refraction index.
Table 10. Third order susceptibilities for Sn75–78.
Table 10. Third order susceptibilities for Sn75–78.
#χ(3) × 10−12 esu
Sn753.18
Sn763.02
Sn771.38
Sn781.43
Table 11. Largest TPA observed in chloroform for Sn79Sn82.
Table 11. Largest TPA observed in chloroform for Sn79Sn82.
#σTPA (GM)
Sn79440
Sn80517
Sn81355
Sn82188

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiménez, C.C.; Enríquez-Cabrera, A.; González-Antonio, O.; Ordóñez-Hernández, J.; Lacroix, P.G.; Labra-Vázquez, P.; Farfán, N.; Santillan, R. State of the Art of Boron and Tin Complexes in Second- and Third-Order Nonlinear Optics §. Inorganics 2018, 6, 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6040131

AMA Style

Jiménez CC, Enríquez-Cabrera A, González-Antonio O, Ordóñez-Hernández J, Lacroix PG, Labra-Vázquez P, Farfán N, Santillan R. State of the Art of Boron and Tin Complexes in Second- and Third-Order Nonlinear Optics §. Inorganics. 2018; 6(4):131. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6040131

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiménez, Cristina C., Alejandro Enríquez-Cabrera, Oscar González-Antonio, Javier Ordóñez-Hernández, Pascal G. Lacroix, Pablo Labra-Vázquez, Norberto Farfán, and Rosa Santillan. 2018. "State of the Art of Boron and Tin Complexes in Second- and Third-Order Nonlinear Optics §" Inorganics 6, no. 4: 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6040131

APA Style

Jiménez, C. C., Enríquez-Cabrera, A., González-Antonio, O., Ordóñez-Hernández, J., Lacroix, P. G., Labra-Vázquez, P., Farfán, N., & Santillan, R. (2018). State of the Art of Boron and Tin Complexes in Second- and Third-Order Nonlinear Optics §. Inorganics, 6(4), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6040131

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop