Next Article in Journal
Output Power Monitoring of Ultraviolet Light-Emitting Diode via Sapphire Substrate
Previous Article in Journal
VOC Monitoring and Ozone Generation Potential Analysis Based on a Single-Photon Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optical Imaging in Brainsmatics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Neurophotonics—Optics for the Brain”

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA 02155, USA
Photonics 2020, 7(3), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics7030062
Submission received: 18 August 2020 / Accepted: 21 August 2020 / Published: 25 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurophotonics – Optics for the Brain)

Abstract

:
Light-tissue interactions allow for a multitude of possibilities to sense; image; and impact the brain at molecular, cellular, and tissue levels. The application of optical techniques to neuronal tissue is the essence of neurophotonics, to which this Special Issue is dedicated. The eleven articles in this Special Issue are representative of the broad scope of this field and of the wide range of optical techniques that it encompasses. In more detail, the articles cover basic neuroscience, neuroanatomy, functional imaging, cerebral hemodynamics, brain development and aging, brain–computer interfaces, and therapeutic treatments. The optical techniques considered include various types of optical microscopy, optical coherence tomography, photoacoustic imaging, diffuse optical spectroscopy and imaging, photobiomodulation, and optogenetics.

1. Introduction

The term neurophotonics, or optics for the brain, refers to a broad range of applications of optical techniques in neuroscience, neuroimaging, and neuromodulation that are relevant for basic science, medical diagnostics, therapeutic treatment, and brain monitoring. The eleven articles in this Special Issue represent a good portion of the many facets of neurophotonics, including a variety of optical imaging techniques (microscopy and optical coherence tomography [1,2], photoacoustic imaging [3], diffuse optics [4,5,6,7,8,9]), optical control of specific neural populations (optogenetics) [10], and the therapeutic application of red/near-infrared light (photobiomodulation) [11]. To illustrate the power and far-reaching possibilities of neurophotonics, specific applications reported in this Special Issue include the visualization of large-scale neurodynamics at high spatio-temporal resolution [3]; whole-brain atlases at high resolution [1,2]; development of the infant brain [5]; assessment of mental workload [7]; characterization of cerebral hemodynamics [9]; measurable effects of brain aging [8]; development of innovative brain–computer interfaces (BCI) [6]; a review of diffuse optical imaging in cognitive and social sciences, functional studies, and medicine [4]; photobiomodulation for Alzheimer’s disease [11]; and optogenetics as a therapeutic and rehabilitative tool [10]. Neurophotonics is a scientifically and technologically diverse field that can sense and interact with the brain at molecular, cellular, and tissue levels. It may rely on intrinsic tissue properties or take advantage of genetic engineering or the introduction of suitable fluorescent, absorbing, or voltage-sensitive agents. Applications range from tissue specimens and animal models to human subjects either at rest or freely moving in naturalistic environments.

2. Diffuse Optics and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS)

Non-invasive diffuse optical methods for diagnostic, functional, and monitoring applications have been applied to the human brain since the early 1990s. Their major advantages are the safe, non-invasive applicability, including in infants and children; a sensitivity to cerebral hemodynamics and oxygenation; and the portability/wearability of the instrumentation. Limitations include a low spatial resolution that prevents studies at a cellular level, a limited penetration depth that restricts measurements to the most superficial brain cortex, and sensitivity to extracerebral tissue (scalp, skull, etc.) that may impact the specific sensitivity to the brain. A number of reviews have been devoted to the field, including a history review [12]; applications of continuous-wave (CW) [13], time-domain (TD) [14], frequency-domain (FD) [15], and wearable [16] functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS); perspectives [17]; and a bibliometric evaluation of publications in the field from 2000 to 2019 [18]. These review articles show how diffuse optics for the brain and fNIRS are very active and growing fields of research that permeate a large number of areas, including cerebral diagnostics, monitoring, neural development, functional imaging, mental states assessment, psychology research, hyperscanning, etc.
This Special Issue includes articles that describe a variety of fNIRS applications. Anna Blasi et al. present the unique and powerful application of fNIRS to the infant brain for neurocognitive development studies, including markers of compromised brain development, the role of socio-economic and environmental conditions, and global health aspects explored in low- and middle-income countries [5]. The state of the art of fNIRS is reviewed by Valentina Quaresima and Marco Ferrari, who consider basic and technological developments (see Table 1 in their article [4]) as well as applications in cognitive and social sciences, functional neuroimaging, and medical diagnostics (see Table 2 in their article [4]), including a critical perspective of future directions [4]. Functional imaging can be used to assess mental workload, as conducted by Kosar Khaksari et al. in an n-back working memory task [7], which can lead to the development of real-time feedback on brain states of a user for the development of novel implicit brain–computer interfaces (BCI), as discussed by Alexa Bosworth et al. [6]. Antonio Chiarelli et al. found that aging-related physiological and anatomical brain changes correlate with non-invasive optical measurements of the effective attenuation coefficient, which represents the collective absorption and scattering properties of extracerebral and cerebral tissue [8]. A study by Giles Blaney et al. targeted extracerebral and cerebral hemodynamics that are coherent with oscillations in systemic arterial blood pressure, finding evidence of blood-volume-dominated extracerebral hemodynamics vs. blood-flow-dominated cerebral hemodynamics [9].

3. Photoacoustic Imaging (PAI)

Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) is a multi-modality technique that combines light and ultrasound to generate images based on optical contrast while exploiting the weaker scattering of ultrasound compared to light in biological tissue [19,20]. A distinct advantage of this technique is its unique flexibility that allows for the scalability of penetration depth, spatial resolution, field of view, and temporal resolution. In fact, PAI can achieve sub-micron to sub-millimeter resolutions at penetration depths of a few hundred microns to centimeters, respectively. The source of contrast in PAI is also versatile, as it may rely on endogenous chromophores as well as a variety of exogenous contrast agents that allow for the development of molecular PAI [21]. Non-invasive applications of PAI to the adult human brain are complicated by the strong optical scattering, ultrasound attenuation, and ultrasound distortion introduced by the scalp and adult skull, but preclinical animal brain models [22] and the infant brain [23] are successfully investigated with photoacoustic imaging.
The PAI article by Oleksiy Degtyaruk et al. in this Special Issue presents an approach to real-time imaging of neuronal activity in the whole mouse brain, collecting the fluorescence signal (centered at 525 nm) from a genetically encoded calcium indicator (GCaMP6f) excited at 488 nm [3]. The challenge presented by the strong absorption of blood at these visible wavelengths is tackled by intracardiac perfusion of the mouse brain with artificial cerebrospinal fluid to observe calcium dynamics deep in the mouse brain, thus paving the way for calcium indicator imaging with PAI [3].

4. Optical Microscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

A variety of optical microscopy techniques play a crucial role in neuroscience [24]: confocal microscopy, two-photon microscopy, light-sheet microscopy [25], super-resolution microscopy, coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy (CARS) microscopy, second-harmonic generation (SHG) and third-harmonic generation (THG) microscopy, optical coherence tomography [26,27], etc. Because of strong light scattering in brain tissue, optical microscopy can image only thin tissue layers, but deeper tissue and even whole brain imaging can be achieved by employing optical clearing techniques [28] or with physical sectioning by sequentially cutting or ablating tissue [29], as also conducted in serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBEM) [30].
In this Special Issue, Joël Lefebvre et al. review current efforts toward the creation of brain atlases at micron resolution by using serial block-face histology in conjunction with intrinsic contrast imaging techniques such as PAI, OCT, SHG, THG, and CARS microscopy [2]. The ability of optical clearing and mechanical sectioning methods, in conjunction with optical microscopy techniques, to generate high-resolution data for the entire brain at molecular and cellular levels is the basis for the scientific effort invested in the proposed brain-wide spatial informatics, named Brainsmatics, reported in the article by Hua Shi et al.

5. Photobiomodulation (PBM)

The application of low levels of red and near-infrared optical irradiance (energy per unit time per unit area) onto a tissue surface for beneficial effects (pain relief, enhancement of cell function, anti-inflammatory response, mitigation of pathological conditions, etc.) was introduced in the 1960s, and was indicated with various terms, including biostimulation and low-level laser therapy (LLLT), before settling on the current term of choice: photobiomodulation (PBM) [31]. The many tissues and conditions that PBM targets include the brain in animal studies, and areas such as ischemic stroke, traumatic brain injury, Alzheimer’s disease, neurodegeneration, mental health conditions, etc. in clinical studies. [32].
In this Special Issue, Michael Hamblin reviews the involved chromophores, the photobiology, and mechanisms of PBM in the brain, and then focuses on Alzheimer’s disease and dementia, discussing related PBM studies on animal models and human clinical trials [11].

6. Optogenetics

Optogenetics is a powerful neuroscience technique that allows for specific and temporally precise control of neural activity by selective optical excitation or inhibition of genetically engineered neurons that express light-sensitive proteins (opsins) [33]. Optogenetic approaches have revolutionized neurobiological and neuroscience research and found a multitude of applications, including developmental biology [34], studies on freely moving animals [35], psychiatric research [36], etc.
In this Special Issue, Elena Montagni et al. review the development of opsins as optogenetic actuators, approaches to light delivery that achieve desired spatio-temporal characteristics, optogenetic methods to study neural circuits and functional connectivity, and optogenetics as a potential therapeutic tool for neurodegenerative disease and stroke [10].

7. The Broad Scope and Impact of Neurophotonics

The articles in this Special Issue provide an overview, partial but certainly representative, of the exciting and far-reaching field of neurophotonics, which illustrates how light-tissue interactions can be exploited for sensing; imaging; and impacting brain tissue at molecular, cellular, and tissue levels. The scope of the application of neurophotonics is extremely broad, from basic neuroscience and neurobiology, to medical diagnostics, functional imaging, therapeutic treatments, brain–computer interfaces, etc. Neurophotonics is a fast growing field that is helping to advance our understanding of how the brain is structured and functions; how it develops and ages; how its health may be assessed, monitored, and potentially restored; and how its cognitive and mental states may be objectively determined.

Funding

I acknowledge support from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 NS095334.

Acknowledgments

I acknowledge the efficient assistance from the Photonics editorial office during the preparation of this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shi, H.; Guan, Y.; Chen, J.; Luo, Q. Optical imaging in brainsmatics. Photonics 2019, 6, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Lefebvre, J.; Delafontane-Martel, P.; Lesage, F. A review of intrinsic optical imaging serial blockface histology (ICI-SBH) for whole rodent brain imaging. Photonics 2019, 6, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Degtyaruk, O.; Mc Larney, B.; Deán-Ben, X.L.; Shoham, S.; Razansky, D. Optoacoustic calcium imaging of deep brain activity in an intracardially perfused mouse brain model. Photonics 2019, 6, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Quaresima, V.; Ferrari, M. A mini-review on functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS): Where do we stand, and where should we go? Photonics 2019, 6, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Blasi, A.; Lloyd-Fox, S.; Katus, L.; Elwell, C.E. fNIRS for tracking brain development in the context of global health projects. Photonics 2019, 6, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bosworth, A.; Russell Jacob, R.J.K. Update of fNIRS an an input to brain-computer interfaces: A review of research from the Tufts human-computer interation laboratory. Photonics 2019, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Khaksari, K.; Condy, E.; Millerhagen, J.B.; Anderson, A.A.; Dashtestani, H.; Gandjbakhche, A.H. Effects of performance and task duration on mental workload during working memory task. Photonics 2019, 6, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chiarelli, A.M.; Low, K.A.; Maclin, E.L.; Fletcher, M.A.; Kong, T.S.; Zimmerman, B.; Tan, C.H.; Sutton, B.P.; Fabiani, M.; Gratton, G. The optical effective attenuation coefficient as an informative measure of brain health in aging. Photonics 2019, 6, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Blaney, G.; Sassaroli, A.; Pham, T.; Krishnamurthy, N.; Fantini, S. Multi-distance frequency-domain optical measurements of coherent cerebral hemodynamics. Photonics 2019, 6, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Montagni, E.; Resta, F.; Mascaro, A.L.A.; Pavone, F.S. Optogenetics in brain research: From a strategy to investigate physiological function to a therapeutic tool. Photonics 2019, 6, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hamblin, M.R. Photobiomodulation for Alzheimer’s disease: Has the light dawned? Photonics 2019, 6, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ferrari, M.; Quaresima, V. A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application. NeuroImage 2012, 63, 921–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Scholkmann, F.; Kleiser, S.; Metz, A.J.; Zimmermann, R.; Pavia, J.M.; Wolf, U.; Wolf, M. A review on continuous wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging instrumentation and methodology. NeuroImage 2014, 85, 6–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Torricelli, A.; Contini, D.; Pifferi, A.; Caffini, M.; Re, R.; Zucchelli, L.; Spinelli, L. Time domain functional NIRS imaging for human brain mapping. NeuroImage 2014, 85, 28–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Fantini, S.; Sassaroli, A. Frequency-domain techniques for cerebral and functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Pinti, P.; Aichelburg, C.; Gilbert, S.; Hamilton, A.; Hirsch, J.; Burgess, P.; Tachtsidis, I. A review on the use of wearable functional near-infrared spectroscopy in naturalistic environments. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 2018, 60, 343–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Fantini, S.; Frederick, B.; Sassaroli, A. Perspective: Prospects of non-invasive sensing of the human brain with diffuse optical imaging. APL Photonics 2018, 3, 110901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Yan, W.; Zheng, K.; Weng, L.; Chen, C.; Kiartivich, S.; Jiang, X.; Su, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X. Bibliometric evaluation of 2000–2019 publications on functional near-infrared spectroscopy. NeuroImage 2020, 220, 117121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, M.; Wang, L.V. Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2006, 77, 041101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Beard, P. Biomedical photoacoustic imaging. Interface Focus 2011, 1, 602–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Weber, J.; Beard, P.C.; Bohndiek, S.E. Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Yao, J.; Wang, L.; Yang, J.-M.; Maslov, K.I.; Wong, T.T.W.; Li, L.; Huang, C.-H.; Zou, J.; Wang, L.V. High-speed label-free functional photoacoustic microscopy of mouse brain in action. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 407–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mohammadi-Nejad, A.-R.; Mahmoudsadeh, M.; Hassanpour, M.S.; Wallois, F.; Muzik, O.; Papadelis, C.; Hansen, A.; Soltanian-Zadeh, H.; Gelovani, J.; Nasiriavanaki, M. Neonatal brain resting-state functional connectivity imaging modalities. Photoacoustics 2018, 10, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wilt, B.A.; Burns, L.D.; Ho, E.T.W.; Ghosh, K.K.; Mukamel, E.A.; Schnitzer, M.J. Advances in light microscopy for neuroscience. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 32, 435–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Hillman, E.M.C.; Voleti, V.; Li, W.Z.; Yu, H. Light-sheet microscopy in neuroscience. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2019, 42, 295–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Men, J.; Huang, Y.; Solanki, J.; Zeng, X.; Alex, A.; Jerwick, J.; Zhang, Z.; Tanzi, R.E.; Zhou, C. Optical coherence tomography for brain imaging and developmental biology. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2016, 22, 6803213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Baran, U.; Wang, R.K. Review of optical coherence tomography based angiography in neuroscience. Neurophotonics 2016, 3, 010902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Richardson, D.S.; Lichtman, J.W. Clarifying tissue clearing. Cell 2015, 162, 246–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Li, A.; Gong, H.; Zhang, B.; Wang, Q.; Yan, C.; Wu, J.; Liu, Q.; Zeng, S.; Luo, Q. Micro-optical sectioning tomography to obtain a high-resolution atlas of the mouse brain. Science 2010, 330, 1404–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wanner, A.A.; Kirschmann, M.A.; Genoud, C. Challenges of microtome-based serial block-face scanning electron microscopy in neuroscience. J. Microsc. 2015, 259, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hamblin, M.R. Photobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy. J. Biophotonics 2016, 9, 1122–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hamblin, M.R.; Huang, Y.-Y. Photobiomodulation in the Brain: Low-Level Laser (Light) Therapy in Neurology and Neuroscience; Elsevier: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim, C.K.; Adhikari, A.; Deisseroth, K. Integration of optogenetics with complementary methodologies in systems neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2017, 18, 222–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Krueger, D.; Izquierdo, E.; Viswanathan, R.; Hartmann, J.; Pallares Cartes, C.; De Renzis, S. Principles and applications of optogenetics in developmental biology. Development 2019, 146, dev175067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Deubner, J.; Coulon, P.; Diester, I. Optogenetic approaches to study the mammalian brain. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2019, 57, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shirai, F.; Hayashi-Takagi, A. Optogenetics: Applications in psychiatric research. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2017, 71, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fantini, S. Special Issue “Neurophotonics—Optics for the Brain”. Photonics 2020, 7, 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics7030062

AMA Style

Fantini S. Special Issue “Neurophotonics—Optics for the Brain”. Photonics. 2020; 7(3):62. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics7030062

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fantini, Sergio. 2020. "Special Issue “Neurophotonics—Optics for the Brain”" Photonics 7, no. 3: 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics7030062

APA Style

Fantini, S. (2020). Special Issue “Neurophotonics—Optics for the Brain”. Photonics, 7(3), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics7030062

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop