Low-Loss, Multi-Reticle-Stitched SiN Waveguides for 300 mm Wafer-Level Optical Interconnects
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Prospects of High-Precision Reticle Stitching
3. Multi-Reticle-Stitched SiN Waveguides
4. SiN Waveguide Stitch Loss Analysis
5. Stitch Loss with a Worse 20 nm Reticle Offset
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix A.1. Summary on SiN SiN Technology
| Category | Value (±3σ) |
|---|---|
| Mask Reticle | Mask Size = 26 × 33 mm Reticle offset < 5 nm Lithography = ASML TWINSCAN NXT:2000i DUV from ASML, Veldhoven, The Netherlands |
| LPCVD SiN deposition recipe | LPCVD deposition Temperature = 770 °C LPCVD Pressure = 225 mTorr DCS (dichlorosilane, SiH2Cl2) gas flow = 80 sccm NH3 (ammonia) gas flow = 280 sccm |
| Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum of LPCVD SiN | ![]() A slight peak (inset) at approximately 3300 cm−1 in the FTIR spectrum (red) of an LPCVD SiN film indicates the presence of N–H (nitrogen-hydrogen) bonds. |
| SiN ring resonator design parameters (layout in Figure 5) | Ring length = 6011 µm Number of 50 µm radius 90-degree bends = 26 Number of waveguide stitches = 12 Bus-to-ring distance = 1.5, 1.6 µm |
| 300 nm thick SiN waveguide | Actual thickness: 302.1 ± 11.3 nm Waveguide loss: 0.131 ± 0.005 dB/cm 50 µm radius 90-degree bend loss: 0.0159 ± 0.0057 dB Ref ring internal loss = 0.485 ± 0.0762 dB (d = 1.5 µm) Ref ring internal loss = 0.475 ± 0.0816 dB (d = 1.6 µm) Stitch loss = 0.00076 ± 0.0010 dB |
| 400 nm thick SiN waveguide | Actual thickness: 401.2 ± 15.6 nm Waveguide loss: 0.145 ± 0.004 dB/cm 50 µm radius 90-degree bend loss: 0.0087 ± 0.0045 dB Ref ring internal loss = 0.349 ± 0.0783 dB (d = 1.5 µm) Ref ring internal loss = 0.315 ± 0.0846 dB (d = 1.6 µm) Stitch loss = 0.00064 ± 0.0014 dB |
Appendix A.2. Loss Simulation on SiN Waveguide Stitch

Appendix A.3. Stitch Loss Extraction Method

| # | Components of Ring Internal Loss | Stitch Ring | Ref Ring | Remarks | Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dielectric material absorption loss | √ | √ | identical loss | Although the ring resonator design influences the readout of internal loss, the stitch ring and ref ring share an identical layout, ensuring that their intrinsic losses are the same. |
| 2 | Round-trip propagation loss | √ | √ | ||
| 3 | Waveguide bending loss | √ | √ | ||
| 4 | Coupling loss | √ | √ | Although smaller bus-to-ring distances would result in slightly higher coupling loss, the stitch ring and reference ring have identical layouts, ensuring that the coupling loss is the same. | |
| 5 | Waveguide stitch loss | √ | × | loss difference | The stitch loss is the internal loss difference between the stitch ring and the ref ring, which is independent of the add–drop ring design parameters. |
| √ indicates the resonator has this loss; × indicates the resonator does not have this loss. | |||||
References
- Liu, H.; Urata, R.; Yasumura, K.; Zhou, X.; Bannon, R.; Berger, J.; Dashti, P.; Jouppi, N.; Lam, C.; Li, S.; et al. Lightwave fabrics: At-scale optical circuit switching for datacenter and machine learning systems. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2023 Conference, New York, NY, USA, 10–14 September 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Khani, M.; Ghobadi, M.; Alizadeh, M.; Zhu, Z.; Glick, M.; Bergman, K.; Vahdat, A.; Klenk, B.; Ebrahimi, E. SiP-ML: High-bandwidth optical network interconnects for machine learning training. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2021 Conference, New York, NY, USA, 23–27 August 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Young, I.A.; Mohammed, E.; Liao, J.T.; Kern, A.M.; Palermo, S.; Block, B.A.; Reshotko, M.R.; Chang, P.L. Optical I/O technology for tera-scale computing. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2010, 45, 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gholami, A.; Yao, Z.; Kim, S.; Hooper, C.; Mahoney, M.W.; Keutzer, K. AI and memory wall. IEEE Micro 2024, 44, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, P.; He, J.; Kennes, K.; Dvoretskii, A.; Podpod, A.; Lepage, G.; Golshani, N.; Magdziak, R.; Bipul, S.; Bode, D.; et al. Collective die-to-wafer bonding enabling low-loss evanescent coupling for optically interconnected system-on-wafer. In Proceedings of the 2024 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, 24–28 March 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Kennes, K.; Dvoretskii, A.; Podpod, A.; Xu, P.; He, J.; Lepage, G.; Golshani, N.; Verheyen, P.; Magdziak, R.; Bipul, S.; et al. Collective die-to-wafer assembly process for optically interconnected system-on-wafer. In Proceedings of the IEEE 74th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), Denver, CO, USA, 28–31 May 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Pal, S.; Petrisko, D.; Tomei, M.; Gupta, P.; Iyer, S.S.; Kumar, R. Architecting waferscale processors—A GPU case study. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), Washington, DC, USA, 16–20 February 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Shang, K.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Lin, Y.C.; Yoo, S.B. Low-loss and broadband wafer-scale optical interposers for large-scale heterogeneous integration. Opt. Express 2024, 32, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seok, T.J.; Kwon, K.; Henriksson, J.; Luo, J.; Wu, M.C. Wafer-scale silicon photonic switches beyond die size limit. Optica 2019, 6, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Huang, G.; Wang, R.N.; He, J.; Raja, A.S.; Liu, T.; Engelsen, N.J.; Kippenberg, T.J. High-yield, wafer-scale fabrication of ultralow-loss, dispersion-engineered silicon nitride photonic circuits. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isichenko, A.; Chauhan, N.; Bose, D.; Wang, J.; Kunz, P.D.; Blumenthal, D.J. Photonic integrated beam delivery for a rubidium 3D magneto-optical trap. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferraro, F.J.; De Heyn, P.; Kim, M.; Rajasekaran, N.; Berciano, M.; Muliuk, G.; Bode, D.; Lepage, G.; Janssen, S.; Magdziak, R.; et al. Imec silicon photonics platforms: Performance overview and roadmap. In Proceedings of the Next-Generation Optical Communication: Components, Sub-Systems, and Systems XII, San Francisco, CA, USA, 15 March 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, W.; Feshali, A.; Paniccia, M.; Bowers, J.E. Seamless multi-reticle photonics. Opt. Lett. 2021, 46, 2984–2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Golshani, N.; Witters, T.; McGurk, J.; De Heyn, P.; De Coster, J.; Milenin, A.; Thiam, A.; Mingardi, A.; Verheyen, P.; Pantouvaki, M.; et al. Low-loss, low-temperature PVD sin waveguides. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on Group IV Photonics (GFP), Málaga, Spain, 7–10 December 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L.; Xie, W.; Van Thourhout, D.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, H.; Wang, S. Nonlinear silicon nitride waveguides based on a PECVD deposition platform. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 9645–9654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shao, Z.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Jian, J.; Fan, Z.; Liu, L.; Yang, C.; Zhou, L.; et al. Ultra-low temperature silicon nitride photonic integration platform. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 1865–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogaerts, W.; De Heyn, P.; Van Vaerenbergh, T.; De Vos, K.; Kumar Selvaraja, S.; Claes, T.; Dumon, P.; Bienstman, P.; Van Thourhout, D.; Baets, R. Silicon microring resonators. Laser Photonics Rev. 2012, 6, 47–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Q.; Liu, L.; Li, X.; Michel, J.; Zhou, Z. Linear-regression-based approach for loss extraction from ring resonators. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 4747–4750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]








| ~100 nm Level Precision Reticle Stitching | ~10 nm Level Precision Reticle Stitching | |
|---|---|---|
| Basic info | Normal reticle stitching precision on 200 mm silicon photonics platform; enables the fabrication of multi-reticle large-scale photonic integrated circuits (PICs). | Higher reticle stitching precision (in this paper, demonstrated ~5 nm), primarily on 300 mm silicon photonics platforms. |
| Waveguide | Low-confinement waveguides (e.g., 100 nm thick SiN waveguides) can be stitched due to the large waveguide mode field diameter. | High-confinement waveguide arrays (e.g., 300 or 400 nm thicker waveguides, or Si waveguides) require ~10 nm stitching precision to minimize stitch loss and interface reflection. |
| Prospects | ![]() Reticle stitching suitable for lower-confinement waveguides, where typical reticle offsets of ~100 nm introduce negligible issues, as the stitch loss is low. The dashed lines indicate the reticle scribe lines. | ![]() A 300 mm wafer can accommodate ~100 XPUs, HBM stacks, and laser arrays to form AI/ML compute clusters. The ~10 nm level higher precision reticle stitching allows 300 to 400 nm thick SiN waveguides; allows densely packed SiN waveguide arrays at 2~5 μm pitch, ensuring reliable and low crosstalk long-distance propagation; allows 25~50 μm bend radii flexible routing; allows return loss isolation > 50–60 dB for dense laser arrays; and allows effective and compact waveguide crossings to provide better flexibility in inter-chip connectivity. |
| Disadvantages | The ~100 nm level reticle stitching is suitable for low-confinement waveguides, which have a substantial drawback that limits optical I/O edge bandwidth density. For example, low-confinement waveguides require thick oxide cladding to prevent substrate leakage, require >10 μm waveguide pitches to prevent dense waveguide crosstalk, require >100 μm bend radii to minimize bending loss, and lack effective and compact low-loss waveguide crossing devices—waveguide intersections are not allowed. | Achieving ~10 nm level reticle offsets requires advanced 193 nm immersion lithography tools and a 300 mm silicon photonic platform. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Xu, P.; Marchese, C.; Lepage, G.; Golshani, N.; Eenaeme, R.V.; Mingardi, A.; Van Ongeval, J.; Magdziak, R.; Halipre, L.; Trivkovic, D.; et al. Low-Loss, Multi-Reticle-Stitched SiN Waveguides for 300 mm Wafer-Level Optical Interconnects. Photonics 2026, 13, 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13010100
Xu P, Marchese C, Lepage G, Golshani N, Eenaeme RV, Mingardi A, Van Ongeval J, Magdziak R, Halipre L, Trivkovic D, et al. Low-Loss, Multi-Reticle-Stitched SiN Waveguides for 300 mm Wafer-Level Optical Interconnects. Photonics. 2026; 13(1):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13010100
Chicago/Turabian StyleXu, Pengfei, Chiara Marchese, Guy Lepage, Negin Golshani, Ruben Van Eenaeme, Andrea Mingardi, Joost Van Ongeval, Rafal Magdziak, Luc Halipre, Darko Trivkovic, and et al. 2026. "Low-Loss, Multi-Reticle-Stitched SiN Waveguides for 300 mm Wafer-Level Optical Interconnects" Photonics 13, no. 1: 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13010100
APA StyleXu, P., Marchese, C., Lepage, G., Golshani, N., Eenaeme, R. V., Mingardi, A., Van Ongeval, J., Magdziak, R., Halipre, L., Trivkovic, D., Verheyen, P., Chakrabarti, M., Velenis, D., Miller, A., Ferraro, F., Ban, Y., & Campenhout, J. V. (2026). Low-Loss, Multi-Reticle-Stitched SiN Waveguides for 300 mm Wafer-Level Optical Interconnects. Photonics, 13(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13010100




