You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Hongyou Zhang1,2,*,
  • Yu Hu2,3 and
  • Shuihai Peng1,2
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

see attached reviewer report.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Quality of English Language is good in general.

Author Response

Dear Sir, 
We thanks for your detailed comments, which really benefit our manuscript. We have carefully considered all comments and accordingly revised our manuscript. The point by point responses to the reviewer’s comments are listed below, and our responses start with dashes “--” in the Word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please see the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

extensive editing of English language required

Author Response

Dear Sir, 
We thanks for your detailed comments, which really benefit our manuscript. We have carefully considered all comments and accordingly revised our manuscript. The point by point responses to the reviewer’s comments are listed below, and our responses start with dashes “--” in the Word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors addressed the reviewer's comments well. 

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have accorrdingly made corrections.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf