Next Article in Journal
Numerical Investigation of 2D Ordered Pillar Array Columns: An Algorithm of Unit-Cell Automatic Generation and the Corresponding CFD Simulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Phospholipid Profiling: A Computationally Assisted LC-HRMS Approach in Lecithin
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Use of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction on the Quality of Brazil Nut Oil (Bertholletia excelsa HBK)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimized Ethyl Chloroformate Derivatization Using a Box–Behnken Design for Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Quantification of Gallic Acid in Wine

Department of Biochemical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Separations 2025, 12(7), 183; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12070183
Submission received: 18 June 2025 / Revised: 2 July 2025 / Accepted: 8 July 2025 / Published: 9 July 2025

Abstract

Gallic acid, a major phenolic compound in wine, significantly influences its sensory profile and health-related properties, making its accurate measurement essential for both enological and nutritional studies. In this context, a derivatization protocol for gallic acid using ethyl chloroformate (ECF) was developed and optimized for GC-MS analysis, with experimental conditions refined through a Box–Behnken Design (BBD). The BBD systematically investigated the effects of three critical reagent volumes: ethyl chloroformate, pyridine, and ethanol. This approach elucidated complex interactions and quadratic effects, leading to a predictive second-order polynomial model and identifying the optimal derivatization conditions for maximum yield (137 µL of ethyl chloroformate, 51 µL of pyridine, and 161 µL of ethanol per 150 µL of wine). The BBD-optimized GC-MS method was validated and successfully applied to quantify gallic acid in diverse commercial wine samples (white, red, conventional, natural). A key finding was the method’s wide dynamic range, enabling accurate quantification from 5 up to over 600 µg/mL without sample dilution. This work represents, to our knowledge, the first application of a BBD for optimizing the ethyl chloroformate derivatization of gallic acid, providing a robust, efficient, and widely applicable analytical tool for routine quality control and enological research.
Keywords: gallic acid; ethyl chloroformate; derivatization; Box–Behnken design; GS-MS; wine analysis gallic acid; ethyl chloroformate; derivatization; Box–Behnken design; GS-MS; wine analysis
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Botta, S.; Piacentini, R.; Cappelletti, C.; Incocciati, A.; Boffi, A.; Bonamore, A.; Macone, A. Optimized Ethyl Chloroformate Derivatization Using a Box–Behnken Design for Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Quantification of Gallic Acid in Wine. Separations 2025, 12, 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12070183

AMA Style

Botta S, Piacentini R, Cappelletti C, Incocciati A, Boffi A, Bonamore A, Macone A. Optimized Ethyl Chloroformate Derivatization Using a Box–Behnken Design for Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Quantification of Gallic Acid in Wine. Separations. 2025; 12(7):183. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12070183

Chicago/Turabian Style

Botta, Sofia, Roberta Piacentini, Chiara Cappelletti, Alessio Incocciati, Alberto Boffi, Alessandra Bonamore, and Alberto Macone. 2025. "Optimized Ethyl Chloroformate Derivatization Using a Box–Behnken Design for Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Quantification of Gallic Acid in Wine" Separations 12, no. 7: 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12070183

APA Style

Botta, S., Piacentini, R., Cappelletti, C., Incocciati, A., Boffi, A., Bonamore, A., & Macone, A. (2025). Optimized Ethyl Chloroformate Derivatization Using a Box–Behnken Design for Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Quantification of Gallic Acid in Wine. Separations, 12(7), 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12070183

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop