Fabrication and Application of Bio-Based Natural Polymer Coating/Film for Food Preservation: A Review
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Bio-Based Natural Polymers
2.1. Chitosan-Based Edible Coatings/Films
2.2. Starch-Based Coating/Films
2.3. Cellulose-Based Coatings/Films
2.4. Alginate-Based Coating/Film
2.5. Protein-Based Edible Coating/Film
2.6. Comparative Evaluation of Commonly Used Natural Biopolymer Properties
2.7. Other Bio-Based Coating/Film Polymers
3. Fabrication Techniques
3.1. Solution Casting
3.2. Electrospinning
3.3. Spray Coating
3.4. Extrusion
3.5. Compression Molding
3.6. Three-Dimensional Printing
3.7. Summary of Fabrication Techniques for Biopolymer-Based Films
3.8. Nanocomposite Approaches
4. Properties of Bio-Based Natural Polymer Coatings/Films
4.1. Mechanical Properties
- Elongation at break quantifies how much a material can stretch before breaking, with higher elongation values signifying increased ductility and flexibility, which are advantageous for coatings subjected to elongation or deformation [274].
- Adhesion strength refers to the bonding force between the coating and the substrate surface. According to literature reports, the tensile strength of composite films decreases with poor adhesion, underscoring the necessity for robust adhesion to prevent delamination or separation of the coating from the substrate, thereby ensuring long-term durability and performance [275,276].
- Tensile strength represents the maximum stress a material can withstand before failure under tension, indicating the coating’s ability to endure deformation under such conditions [277].
4.2. Barrier Properties (Gas and Moisture)
4.3. Thermal Stability
4.4. Optical Properties
4.5. Antimicrobial Activity
5. Enhancement Strategies
5.1. Incorporation of Antimicrobial Agents
5.2. Crosslinking Methods
5.3. Surface Modification Techniques
6. Application for Food Preservation
6.1. Fresh Produce
Fruits and Vegetables | Edible Coating/Film Used | Outcomes | References |
---|---|---|---|
Pomegranate | Chitosan-based coating | Delayed fruit metabolic changes, higher antioxidant properties, maintained quality and reduced the fruit’s susceptibility to physiological disorders. | [298,391,392] |
Arabic Gum and starch-based | The overall quality of the fruit was maintained, and shelf life was extended. | [393] | |
Mango | Chitosan coating | Shelf life was extended, and the overall quality of the fruit was improved. | [42,394] |
Banana | Opuntia ficus-indica mucilage coating | Extended the banana’s shelf life and preserved its quality. | [389] |
Arabic Gum and chitosan | Coating efficiently maintained the quality of the bananas, preventing weight loss and preserving fruit firmness, and extended shelf life up to 33 days. | [395] | |
Starch coating | The starch-based edible coating effectively delayed ethylene production, reduced respiration rates, and slowed chlorophyll degradation, helping to retain fruit firmness and reduce weight loss. This improved the commercial value of bananas and extended their shelf life by 12 days. | [396] | |
Guava | Chitosan and alginate-based coating | Enhance the quality of fruit and retain the nutritional parameters. | [397] |
Arabic Gum-based edible coating. | These applications reduced weight loss, decay, and Rhizopus rot while increasing marketability and delaying fruit softening. They preserved chlorophyll, vitamin C, and acidity, and slowed changes in TSS and TSS/acid ratios. Overall, the coatings significantly extended the shelf life compared to untreated fruits. | [398] | |
carboxymethyl cellulose-based edible coating | The treatment effectively delayed weight loss and decay in guava fruit while maintaining firmness, sugars, acidity, ascorbic acid, phenol content, and sensory quality for up to 12. | [399] | |
Mandarins | Arabic Gum–Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Composite Coating | Gum Arabic enriched with ZnO-NPs effectively extended the storage period of ‘Kinnow’ mandarins by reducing rind disorders, minimizing metabolic rate and electrolyte leakage, and preserving fruit texture and overall quality. | [400] |
Chitosan-based | The coating preserved bioactive compounds and organic acids effectively. | [47,401] | |
Carboxymethyl cellulose coating | Effectively preserved the postharvest quality of “Kinnow” mandarins, improved membrane integrity and increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes. | [402] | |
Alginate-based edible coating | Extended the shelf life after harvest and preserved the quality of the fruit. | [403] | |
Pecan nuts | cactus mucilage coatings | Coatings effectively preserved the quality of microwave-roasted pecan nuts during storage, maintaining key physicochemical and phytochemical properties, reducing enzyme activities, and enhancing antioxidant properties. | [390] |
Pear | Chitosan-based coating | The coating extended the post-harvest life of ‘Yali’ pears by reducing weight loss and maintaining quality. | [52] |
6.2. Meat and Seafood
6.3. Bakery and Confectionery Products
6.4. Dairy Products
6.5. Ready-to-Eat Meals
7. Limitations, Gaps and Future Directions
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gustavsson, J.; Cederberg, C.; Sonesson, U. Global Food Losses and Food Waste. 2011. Available online: https://www.madr.ro/docs/ind-alimentara/risipa_alimentara/presentation_food_waste.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2024).
- Ali Mekouar, M. 15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Yearb. Int. Environ. Law 2017, 28, 506–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffin, M.; Sobal, J.; Lyson, T.A. An analysis of a community food waste stream. Agric. Hum. Values 2009, 26, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joardder, M.; Masud, M. Food Preservation in Developing Countries: Challenges and Solutions; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mourad, M. Recycling, recovering and preventing ‘food waste’: Competing solutions for food systems sustainability in the United States and France. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 126, 461–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lohita, B.; Srijaya, M. Novel Technologies for Shelf-Life Extension of Food Products as a Competitive Advantage: A Review. In Food Production, Diversity, and Safety Under Climate Change; Advances in Science, Technology and Innovation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; Volume Part F2519, pp. 285–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Díez, J.; Gonçalves, C.; Grispoldi, L.; Cenci-Goga, B.; Saraiva, C. Determining Food Stability to Achieve Food Security. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, I. Food Safety: The Science of Keeping Food Safe. 2018. Available online: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en7lr=&id=HY1FDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP14&dq=Food+safety:+the+science+of+keeping+food+safe.+John+Wiley+%26+Sons.&ots=P8foopVnRj&sig=B9aa3aUR4Bvw4WQbGLBOtFEkAXc (accessed on 2 August 2024).
- De Corato, U. Improving the shelf-life and quality of fresh and minimally-processed fruits and vegetables for a modern food industry: A comprehensive critical review from the traditional technologies into the most promising advancements. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 940–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lupien, O.F. The Role of Traditional Food Processing Technologies in National Development: The West African Experience. academia.edu. 2008. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/download/41261245/Soy_Processing.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2024).
- Devi, L.; Kalita, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Kumar, S. Carnauba wax-based composite films and coatings: Recent advancement in prolonging postharvest shelf-life of fruits and vegetables. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 129, 296–305. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924224422003983 (accessed on 2 August 2024). [CrossRef]
- Alzamora, S.M.; Welti-Chanes, J.; Guerrero, S.N.; Gómez, P.L. Rational use of novel technologies: A comparative analysis of the performance of several new food preservation technologies for microbial inactivation. In Novel Technologies in Food Science: Their Impact on Products, Consumer Trends and the Environment; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 235–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, A.C.Q.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Vilela, C.; Freire, C.S.R. Natural Polymers-Based Materials: A Contribution to a Greener Future. Molecules 2022, 27, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, L.; Chen, L.; Eichhorn, S.; Gandini, A. Polymeric materials from renewable resources. In Biodegradable Polymer Blends and Composites from Renewable Resources; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silvetti, T.; Morandi, S.; Hintersteiner, M.; Brasca, M. Use of Hen Egg White Lysozyme in the Food Industry. In Egg Innovations and Strategies for Improvements; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graça, M.F.P.; Miguel, S.P.; Cabral, C.S.D. Hyaluronic Acid—Based Wound Dressings: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 241, 116364. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144861720305385 (accessed on 2 August 2024). [CrossRef]
- Porta, R.; Sabbah, M.; Di Pierro, P. Biopolymers as food packaging materials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sagar, N.A.; Pareek, S.; Sharma, S.; Yahia, E.M.; Lobo, M.G. Fruit and Vegetable Waste: Bioactive Compounds, Their Extraction, and Possible Utilization. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 512–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tyagi, P.; Salem, K.S.; Hubbe, M.A.; Pal, L. Advances in barrier coatings and film technologies for achieving sustainable packaging of food products—A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 115, 461–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Y.; Farmahini-Farahani, M.; O’hearn, P.; Xiao, H.; Ocampo, H. An Overview of Bio-Based Polymers for Packaging Materials. 2016. Available online: www.Bioresources-Bioproducts.com (accessed on 15 August 2024).
- Babu, R.P.; O’Connor, K.; Seeram, R. Current progress on bio-based polymers and their future trends. Prog. Biomater. 2013, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajeswari, S. NATURAL POLYMERS: A RECENT REVIEW. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 6, 472–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garrison, T.F.; Murawski, A.; Quirino, R.L. Bio-based polymers with potential for biodegradability. Polymers 2016, 8, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miteluț, A.C.; Popa, E.E.; Draghici, M.C.; Popesu, P.A.; Popa, V.L.; Bujor, O.; Ion, V.A.; Popa, M.E. Latest developments in edible coatings on minimally processed fruits and vegetables: A review. Foods 2021, 10, 2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priya, K.; Thirunavookarasu, N.; Chidanand, D.V. Recent advances in edible coating of food products and its legislations: A review. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 12, 100623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Sood, A.; Han, S.S. Poly (vinyl alcohol)-alginate as potential matrix for various applications: A focused review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 277, 118881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raghav, P.K.; Agarwal, N.; Saini, M. Edible Coating of Fruits and Vegetables: A Review. Int. J. Sci. Res. Mod. Educ. 2016, 1, 188–204. [Google Scholar]
- Gandini, A. Polymers from renewable resources: A challenge for the future of macromolecular materials. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 9491–9504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, T.; Liao, Z.; Lei, H.; Fang, X.; Wang, J.; Zhong, Q. Antibacterial activity of food-grade chitosan against Vibrio parahaemolyticus biofilms. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 110, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Z.X.; Wang, L.; Du, L.; Guo, S.R.; Wang, X.Q.; Tang, T.T. Adjustment of the antibacterial activity and biocompatibility of hydroxypropyltrimethyl ammonium chloride chitosan by varying the degree of substitution of quaternary ammonium. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 81, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akyuz, L.; Kaya, M.; Koc, B.; Mujtaba, M.; Ilk, S.; Labidi, J.; Salaberria, A.M.; Cakmak, Y.S.; Yildiz, A. Diatomite as a novel composite ingredient for chitosan film with enhanced physicochemical properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 105, 1401–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mwelase, S.; Opara, U.L.; Fawole, O.A. Effect of chitosan-based melatonin composite coating on the quality of minimally processed pomegranate aril-sacs during cold storage. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, J.; Xie, S.; Cao, J.; Ge, H.; Xu, M.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, J. Quaternized Chitosan/Poly(acrylic acid) Polyelectrolyte Complex Hydrogels with Tough, Self-Recovery, and Tunable Mechanical Properties. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 1049–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsabee, M.Z.; Abdou, E.S. Chitosan based edible films and coatings: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33, 1819–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rinaudo, M. Chitin and chitosan: Properties and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2006, 31, 603–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Younes, I.; Rinaudo, M. Chitin and chitosan preparation from marine sources. Structure, properties and applications. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 1133–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, J. Application of Chitosan Based Coating in Fruit and Vegetable Preservation: A Review. J. Food Process. Technol. 2013, 4, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Cai, Y.; Jiang, X.; Wu, J. Molecular interactions, characterization and antimicrobial activity of curcumin–chitosan blend films. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 52, 564–572. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268005X15300503 (accessed on 20 August 2024). [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Xiao, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Su, H.; Tan, T. Preparation of chitosan-TiO2 composite film with efficient antimicrobial activities under visible light for food packaging applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 169, 101–107. Available online: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20173222866 (accessed on 20 August 2024). [CrossRef]
- Singh, H.; Bhasin, J.K.; Dash, K.K.; Shams, R.; Shaikh, A.M.; Béla, K. Effect of chitosan based edible coating in management of post harvest losses in Papaya: A comprehensive review. Appl. Food Res. 2024, 4, 100456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, S.K.; Sarkar, S.; Sethi, L.N.; Ghosh, S.K. Development of chitosan-based optimized edible coating for tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and its characterization. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 2446–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbasi, N.A.; Hafiz, I.A. Postharvest quality of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Fruit as affected by Chitosan coating. Pak. J. Bot. 2009, 41, 343–357. [Google Scholar]
- Viacava, G.E.; Cenci, M.P.; Ansorena, M.R. Effect of Chitosan Edible Coatings Incorporated with Free or Microencapsulated Thyme Essential Oil on Quality Characteristics of Fresh-Cut Carrot Slices. Food Bioproc. Technol. 2022, 15, 768–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suseno, N.; Savitri, E.; Sapei, L.; Padmawijaya, K.S. Improving Shelf-life of Cavendish Banana Using Chitosan Edible Coating. Procedia Chem. 2014, 9, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anraku, M.; Gebicki, J.; Iohara, D.; Tomida, H.; Uekama, K.; Maruyama, T.; Hirayama, F.; Otagiri, M. Antioxidant activities of chitosans and its derivatives in in vitro and in vivo studies. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 199, 141–149. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144861718308075 (accessed on 2 August 2024). [CrossRef]
- Bautista-Baños, S.; Romanazzi, G.; Jiménez-Aparicio, A. Chitosan in the Preservation of Agricultural Commodities. 2016. Available online: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=rWhBCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=Kt3CV-h4Nz&sig=m-WSmRHgUr1RsHt_5DSUo3zMe_M (accessed on 23 August 2024).
- Jurić, S.; Bureš, M.S.; Vlahoviček-Kahlina, K.; Stracenski, K.S.; Fruk, G.; Jalšenjak, N.; Bandić, L.M. Chitosan-based layer-by-layer edible coatings application for the preservation of mandarin fruit bioactive compounds and organic acids. Food Chem. X 2023, 17, 100575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, D.; Xu, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Xia, W. Effects of chitosan coating combined with essential oils on quality and antioxidant enzyme activities of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) fillets stored at 4 °C. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, C.; Zhao, Y.; Leonard, S.W.; Traber, M.G. Edible coatings to improve storability and enhance nutritional value of fresh and frozen strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa) and raspberries (Rubus ideaus). Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2004, 33, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riaz, A.; Aadil, R.M.; Amoussa, A.M.O.; Bashari, M.; Abid, M.; Hashim, M.M. Application of chitosan-based apple peel polyphenols edible coating on the preservation of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa cv Hongyan) fruit. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleem, M.S.; Anjum, M.A.; Naz, S.; Ali, S.; Hussain, S.; Azam, M.; Sardar, H.; Khaliq, G.; Canan, İ.; Ejaz, S. Incorporation of ascorbic acid in chitosan-based edible coating improves postharvest quality and storability of strawberry fruits. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 189, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, L.; Wang, B.; Wang, M.; Cao, J.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Y.; Jiang, W. Effects of a chitosan-based coating with ascorbic acid on post-harvest quality and core browning of ‘Yali’ pears (Pyrus bertschneideri Rehd.). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nxumalo, K.A.; Fawole, O.A. Effects of chitosan coatings fused with medicinal plant extracts on postharvest quality and storage stability of purple passion fruit (Passiflora edulis var. Ester). Food Qual. Saf. 2022, 6, fyac016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bangar, S.P.; Purewal, S.S.; Trif, M.; Maqsood, S.; Kumar, M.; Manjunatha, V.; Rusu, A.V. Functionality and Applicability of Starch-Based Films: An Eco-Friendly Approach. Foods 2021, 10, 2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mangaraj, S.; Yadav, A.; Bal, L.M.; Dash, S.K.; Mahanti, N.K. Application of Biodegradable Polymers in Food Packaging Industry: A Comprehensive Review. J. Packag. Technol. Res. 2019, 3, 77–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, H.; Chen, L.; McClements, D.J.; Yang, T.; Zhang, Z.; Ren, F.; Miao, M.; Tian, Y.; Jin, Z. Starch-based biodegradable packaging materials: A review of their preparation, characterization and diverse applications in the food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 114, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Punia, S. Barley starch: Structure, properties and in vitro digestibility—A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155, 868–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farajpour, R.; Emam Djomeh, Z.; Moeini, S.; Tavahkolipour, H.; Safayan, S. Structural and physico-mechanical properties of potato starch-olive oil edible films reinforced with zein nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 149, 941–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, B.; Chatha, S.A.S.; Hussain, A.I.; Zia, K.M.; Akhtar, N. Recent advances on polysaccharides, lipids and protein-based edible films and coatings: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 109, 1095–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arcan, I.; Boyacı, D.; Yemenicioğlu, A. The Use of Zein and Its Edible Films for the Development of Food Packaging Materials. In Reference Module in Food Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cano, A.; Jiménez, A.; Cháfer, M.; Gónzalez, C.; Chiralt, A. Effect of amylose:amylopectin ratio and rice bran addition on starch films properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 111, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cazón, P.; Velazquez, G.; Ramírez, J.A.; Vázquez, M. Polysaccharide-based films and coatings for food packaging: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 68, 136–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez, A.; Fabra, M.J.; Talens, P.; Chiralt, A. Edible and Biodegradable Starch Films: A Review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5, 2058–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonilla, J.; Atarés, L.; Vargas, M.; Chiralt, A. Properties of wheat starch film-forming dispersions and films as affected by chitosan addition. J. Food Eng. 2013, 114, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Hu, Y.; Li, E. Effects of amylose and amylopectin chain-length distribution on the kinetics of long-term rice starch retrogradation. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 111, 106239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H.; Zhan, J.; Shen, W.; Ma, R.; Tian, Y. Assessing Starch Retrogradation from the Perspective of Particle Order. Foods 2024, 13, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Zhao, P.; Chen, J.; Yan, Y.; Wu, Z. Recent Advances and Applications in Starch for Intelligent Active Food Packaging: A Review. Foods 2022, 11, 2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cai, D.; Li, X.; Chen, J.; Jiang, X.; Ma, X.; Sun, J.; Tian, L.; Vidyarthi, S.K.; Xu, J.; Pan, Z.; et al. A comprehensive review on innovative and advanced stabilization approaches of anthocyanin by modifying structure and controlling environmental factors. Food Chem. 2022, 366, 130611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwaśniewska, A.; Chocyk, D.; Gładyszewski, G.; Borc, J.; Świetlicki, M.; Gładyszewska, B. The influence of kaolin clay on the mechanical properties and structure of thermoplastic starch films. Polymers 2020, 12, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, R.; Pristijono, P.; Scarlett, C.J.; Bowyer, M.; Singh, S.P.; Vuong, Q.V. Starch-based films: Major factors affecting their properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 132, 1079–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majeed, T.; Dar, A.H.; Pandey, V.K.; Dash, K.K.; Srivastava, S.; Shams, R.; Jeevarathinam, G.; Singh, P.; Echegaray, N.; Pandiselvam, R. Role of additives in starch-based edible films and coating: A review with current knowledge. Progress Org. Coat. 2023, 181, 107597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nawab, A.; Alam, F.; Hasnain, A. Mango kernel starch as a novel edible coating for enhancing shelf-life of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 103, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oz, A.T.; Ulukanli, Z. Application of edible starch-based coating including glycerol plus oleum Nigella on arils from long-stored whole pomegranate fruits. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2012, 36, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawhena, T.G.; Opara, U.L.; Fawole, O.A. Effect of Gum Arabic and Starch-Based Coating and Different Polyliners on Postharvest Quality Attributes of Whole Pomegranate Fruit. Processes 2022, 10, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, S.; Chen, J.; He, J.; Li, H.; Jia, Q.; Hossen, M.A.; Dai, J.; Qin, W.; Liu, Y. Preparation of corn starch/rock bean protein edible film loaded with d-limonene particles and their application in glutinous rice cake preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 206, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saberi, B.; Golding, J.B.; Marques, J.R.; Pristijono, P.; Chockchaisawasdee, S.; Scarlett, C.J.; Stathopoulos, C.E. Application of biocomposite edible coatings based on pea starch and guar gum on quality, storability and shelf life of ‘Valencia’ oranges. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2018, 137, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, A.D.; Pandey, S.; Jaiswal, V.K.; Bhadauria, V.; Singh, H. Simultaneous oxidation and esterification of cellulose for use in treatment of water containing Cu(II) ions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 222, 114964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Q.; Chen, C.; Rosswurm, K.; Yao, T.; Janaswamy, S. A facile route to prepare cellulose-based films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 149, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ketabchi, M.R.; Khalid, M.; Ratnam, C.T.; Manickam, S.; Walvekar, R.; Hoque, M.E. Sonosynthesis of cellulose nanoparticles (CNP) from kenaf fiber: Effects of processing parameters. Fibers Polym. 2016, 17, 1352–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cruz, R.M.S.; Krauter, V.; Krauter, S.; Agriopoulou, S.; Weinrich, R.; Herbes, C.; Scholten, P.B.V.; Uysal-Unalan, I.; Sogut, E.; Kopacic, S.; et al. Bioplastics for Food Packaging: Environmental Impact, Trends and Regulatory Aspects. Foods 2022, 11, 3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arif, Z.U.; Khalid, M.Y.; Sheikh, M.F.; Zolfagharian, A.; Bodaghi, M. Biopolymeric Sustainable Materials and Their Emerging Applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Lu, A.; Zhang, L. Recent advances in regenerated cellulose materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 53, 169–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoeng, F.; Denneulin, A.; Bras, J. Use of nanocellulose in printed electronics: A review. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 13131–13154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saha, T.; Hoque, M.E.; Mahbub, T. Biopolymers for Sustainable Packaging in Food, Cosmetics, and Pharmaceuticals. In Advanced Processing, Properties, and Applications of Starch and Other Bio-Based Polymers; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 197–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Chen, K.; Zhang, D.; Guo, Z. Stable and durable conductive superhydrophobic coatings prepared by double-layer spray coating method. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cinelli, P.; Coltelli, M.; Signori, F.; Morganti, P. Cosmetic packaging to save the environment: Future perspectives. Cosmetics 2019, 6, 26. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9284/6/2/26 (accessed on 20 August 2024). [CrossRef]
- Shen, D.; Liu, J.; Gan, L.; Huang, N.; Long, M. Green Synthesis of Fe3O4/Cellulose/Polyvinyl Alcohol Hybride Aerogel and Its Application for Dye Removal. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 2234–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, H.; Zhang, H.; Ma, L.; Zhou, H.; Yu, Y.; Guo, T.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, H. Green pH/magnetic sensitive hydrogels based on pineapple peel cellulose and polyvinyl alcohol: Synthesis, characterization and naringin prolonged release. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 209, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, A.H.; Awad-Allah, M.A.A.; Abd-Elkarim, N.A.A.; Ahmed, Z.F.R.; Taha, E.M.A. Carboxymethyl Cellulose from Banana Rachis: A Potential Edible Coating to Extend the Shelf Life of Strawberry Fruit. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maftoonazad, N.; Ramaswamy, H.S. Postharvest shelf-life extension of avocados using methyl cellulose-based coating. LWT 2005, 38, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tesfay, S.; Magwaza, L.; Mbili, N.; Mditshwa, A. Carboxyl methylcellulose (CMC) containing moringa plant extracts as new postharvest organic edible coating for Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) fruit. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 226, 201–207. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423817305289 (accessed on 1 October 2024). [CrossRef]
- Ballesteros, L.F.; Teixeira, J.A.; Cerqueira, M.A. Active Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Based Edible Coatings for the Extension of Fresh Goldenberries Shelf-Life. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minh, N.P. Synergistic Effect of Methyl Cellulose and Carvacrol Coating on Physicochemical and Microbial Attributes of Mango (Mangifera indica) Fruit in Postharvest storage. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 15, 2280–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mousavi, S.R.; Rahmati-Joneidabad, M.; Noshad, M. Effect of chia seed mucilage/bacterial cellulose edible coating on bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of strawberries during cold storage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 190, 618–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, L.; He, Y.; Wang, S.; Cheng, W.; Ma, L.; Liu, G.; Han, D.; Niu, L. Effects of methyl cellulose-based coating on physiochemical properties and chemical hazards of Chinese fried dough cake during storage. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 4770–4779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco-Pascual, N.; Montero, M.P.; Gómez-Guillén, M.C. Antioxidant film development from unrefined extracts of brown seaweeds Laminaria digitata and Ascophyllum nodosum. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 37, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hay, I.D.; Rehman, Z.U.; Fata Moradali, M.; Wang, Y.; Rehm, B.H.A. Microbial alginate production, modification and its applications. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013, 6, 637–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vu, C.H.T.; Won, K. Novel water-resistant UV-activated oxygen indicator for intelligent food packaging. Food Chem. 2013, 140, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ureña, M.; Carullo, D.; Phùng, T.T.T.; Fournier, P.; Farris, S.; Lagorce, A.; Karbowiak, T. Effect of polymer structure on the functional properties of alginate for film or coating applications. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 149, 109557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ncama, K.; Magwaza, L.S.; Mditshwa, A.; Tesfay, S.Z. Plant-based edible coatings for managing postharvest quality of fresh horticultural produce: A review. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 16, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maftoonazad, N.; Ramaswamy, H.S.; Marcotte, M. Shelf-life extension of peaches through sodium alginate and methyl cellulose edible coatings. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 43, 951–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díaz-Mula, H.M.; Serrano, M.; Valero, D. Alginate Coatings Preserve Fruit Quality and Bioactive Compounds during Storage of Sweet Cherry Fruit. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5, 2990–2997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zapata, P.J.; Guillén, F.; Martínez-Romero, D.; Castillo, S.; Valero, D.; Serrano, M. Use of alginate or zein as edible coatings to delay postharvest ripening process and to maintain tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill) quality. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 1287–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valero, D.; Díaz-Mula, H.M.; Zapata, P.J.; Guillén, F.; Martínez-Romero, D.; Castillo, S.; Serrano, M. Effects of alginate edible coating on preserving fruit quality in four plum cultivars during postharvest storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2013, 77, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iversen, L.J.L.; Rovina, K.; Vonnie, J.M.; Matanjun, P.; Erna, K.H.; ‘Aqilah, N.M.N.; Felicia, W.X.L.; Funk, A.A. The Emergence of Edible and Food-Application Coatings for Food Packaging: A Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 5604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luan, Q.Y.; Wang, Y.S.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H.H. Review on improvement of physicochemical properties of sodium alginate-based edible films. J. Food Sci. 2025, 90, e70016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahcene, Z.; Khelil, A.; Hasni, S.; Bozkurt, F.; Goudjil, M.B.; Tornuk, F. Home-made cheese preservation using sodium alginate based on edible film incorporating essential oils. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 2406–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S.; Barkauskaite, S.; Jaiswal, A.K.; Jaiswal, S. Essential oils as additives in active food packaging. Food Chem. 2021, 343, 128403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, M.; Luo, W.; Yang, K.; Li, C. Effects of Sodium Alginate Edible Coating with Cinnamon Essential Oil Nanocapsules and Nisin on Quality and Shelf Life of Beef Slices during Refrigeration. J. Food Prot. 2022, 85, 896–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, S.; Ren, Y.; Wei, C.; Chen, S.; Ye, X.; Jinhu, T. Development of novel EGCG/Fe loaded sodium alginate-based packaging films with antibacterial and slow-release properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 145, 109032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.; Wang, H.; Fu, Y.; Chang, C.; Wu, J. Sodium alginate/gum arabic/glycerol multicomponent edible films loaded with natamycin: Study on physicochemical, antibacterial, and sweet potatoes preservation properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 213, 1068–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sukhavattanakul, P.; Thanyacharoen, T.; Chuysinuan, P.; Techasakul, S.; Ummartyotin, S. Influence of a Transparent and Edible Coating of Encapsulated Cannabidiol Nanoparticles on the Quality and Shelf Life of Strawberries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 23834–23843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lisboa, M.; Chagas, C.; da Costa, J.C.M.; Rossoni, D.; Mikcha, J.M.G.; de Oliveira Silva, J.V.; Batista, A.; Caetano, W.; Madrona, G.S.; Tonon, L.A.C.; et al. Characterization and effect of edible alginate acidified coatings associated with photodynamics on cheese preservation. Appl. Food Res. 2022, 2, 100113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarengaowa; Hu, W.; Jiang, A.; Xiu, Z.; Feng, K. Effect of thyme oil–alginate-based coating on quality and microbial safety of fresh-cut apples. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 2302–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.; Rüegg, N.; Yildirim, S. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of sodium alginate films integrated with cinnamon essential oil and citric acid on sliced cooked ham. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2023, 36, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Małecki, J.; Muszyński, S.; Sołowiej, B.G. Proteins in food systems—Bionanomaterials, conventional and unconventional sources, functional properties, and development opportunities. Polymers 2021, 13, 2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacheco-Gómez, V.; Caballero-Zamora, A.; Martinez-Gonzalez, S.; Prado-Rebolledo, O.; Garcia-Casillas, A. Biochemistry and metabolic pathways of polysaccharides, lipids, and proteins. SciELO Méx. 2021, 11, 1–26. Available online: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S2448-61322021000100205&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en (accessed on 3 October 2024).
- Yan, W.; Zhou, J.; Sun, M.; Chen, J.; Hu, G.; Shen, B. The construction of an amino acid network for understanding protein structure and function. Amino Acids 2014, 46, 1419–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietzen, D.J. Amino acids, peptides, and proteins. In Principles and Applications of Molecular Diagnostics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 345–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, J.F.; Huang, Z.; Yuan, X.Y.; Wang, X.Y.; Li, M. Structure and properties of carboxymethyl cellulose/soy protein isolate blend edible films crosslinked by Maillard reactions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 79, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zink, J.; Wyrobnik, T.; Prinz, T.; Schmid, M. Physical, chemical and biochemical modifications of protein-based films and coatings: An extensive review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barbhuiya, R.I.; Singha, P.; Singh, S.K. A comprehensive review on impact of non-thermal processing on the structural changes of food components. Food Res. Int. 2021, 148, 110647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, C.H. Globular proteins as soft particles for stabilizing emulsions: Concepts and strategies. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 105, 105664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Echers, S.G.; Jafarpour, A.; Yesiltas, B.; García-Moreno, P.J.; Greve-Poulsen, M.; Hansen, D.K.; Hansen, E.B. Targeted hydrolysis of native potato protein: A novel workflow for obtaining hydrolysates with improved interfacial properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 137, 108299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kandasamy, S.; Yoo, J.; Yun, J.; Kang, H.-B.; Seol, K.-H.; Kim, H.-W.; Ham, J.-S. Application of Whey Protein-Based Edible Films and Coatings in Food Industries: An Updated Overview. Coatings 2021, 11, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benbettaïeb, N.; Karbowiak, T.; Debeaufort, F. Bioactive edible films for food applications: Influence of the bioactive compounds on film structure and properties. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 1137–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourtoom, T. Review Article Edible films and coatings: Characteristics and properties. Int. Food Res. J. 2008, 15, 237–248. [Google Scholar]
- Abedi, A.; Lakzadeh, L.; Amouheydari, M. Effect of an edible coating composed of whey protein concentrate and rosemary essential oil on the shelf life of fresh spinach. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robles-Flores, G.d.C.; Abud-Archila, M.; Ventura-Canseco, L.M.C.; Meza-Gordillo, R.; Grajales-Lagunes, A.; Ruiz-Cabrera, M.A.; Gutiérrez-Miceli, F.A. Development and Evaluation of a Film and Edible Coating Obtained from the Cajanus cajan Seed Applied to Fresh Strawberry Fruit. Food Bioprocess. Technol. 2018, 11, 2172–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagh, Y.R.; Pushpadass, H.A.; Emerald, F.M.E.; Nath, B.S. Preparation and characterization of milk protein films and their application for packaging of Cheddar cheese. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 3767–3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thaker, M.; Hanjabam, M.D.; Gudipati, V.; Kannuchamy, N. Protective Effect of Fish Gelatin-Based Natural Antimicrobial Coatings on Quality of Indian Salmon Fillets during Refrigerated Storage. J. Food Process Eng. 2017, 40, e12270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.J.; Lee, J.H.; Won, M.; Song, K.B. Antioxidant activities of distiller dried grains with solubles as protein films containing tea extracts and their application in the packaging of pork meat. Food Chem. 2016, 196, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galus, S.; Mikus, M.; Ciurzyńska, A.; Domian, E.; Kowalska, J.; Marzec, A.; Kowalska, H. The Effect of Whey Protein-Based Edible Coatings Incorporated with Lemon and Lemongrass Essential Oils on the Quality Attributes of Fresh-Cut Pears during Storage. Coatings 2021, 11, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Ren, Y.; Hou, Y.; Zhan, Q.; Jin, P.; Zheng, Y.; Wu, Z. Polysaccharide-Based Composite Films: Promising Biodegradable Food Packaging Materials. Foods 2024, 13, 3674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moeini, A.; Pedram, P.; Fattahi, E.; Cerruti, P.; Santagata, G. Edible Polymers and Secondary Bioactive Compounds for Food Packaging Applications: Antimicrobial, Mechanical, and Gas Barrier Properties. Polymers 2022, 14, 2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Confederat, L.G.; Tuchilus, C.G.; Dragan, M.; Sha’at, M.; Dragostin, O.M. Preparation and Antimicrobial Activity of Chitosan and Its Derivatives: A Concise Review. Molecules 2021, 26, 3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Romão, S.; Bettencourt, A.; Ribeiro, I.A.C. Novel Features of Cellulose-Based Films as Sustainable Alternatives for Food Packaging. Polymers 2022, 14, 4968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rashki, S.; Shakour, N.; Yousefi, Z.; Rezaei, M.; Homayoonfal, M.; Khabazian, E.; Atyabi, F.; Aslanbeigi, F.; Safaei Lapavandani, R.; Mazaheri, S.; et al. Cellulose-Based Nanofibril Composite Materials as a New Approach to Fight Bacterial Infections. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 732461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wardejn, S.; Wacławek, S.; Dudek, G. Improving Antimicrobial Properties of Biopolymer-Based Films in Food Packaging: Key Factors and Their Impact. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Periyasamy, T.; Asrafali, S.P.; Lee, J. Recent Advances in Functional Biopolymer Films with Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties for Enhanced Food Packaging. Polymers 2025, 17, 1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parreidt, T.S.; Müller, K.; Schmid, M. Alginate-based edible films and coatings for food packaging applications. Foods 2018, 7, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calva-Estrada, S.J.; Jiménez-Fernández, M.; Lugo-Cervantes, E. Protein-Based Films: Advances in the Development of Biomaterials Applicable to Food Packaging. Food Eng. Rev. 2019, 11, 78–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Metha, C.; Pawar, S.; Suvarna, V. Recent advancements in alginate-based films for active food packaging applications. Sustain. Food Technol. 2024, 2, 1246–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elgadir, M.A.; Mariod, A.A. Gelatin and Chitosan as Meat By-Products and Their Recent Applications. Foods 2023, 12, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, T.; Wang, X.; Zhang, F. Antibacterial Food Packaging with Chitosan and Cellulose Blends for Food Preservation. Polymers 2025, 17, 1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stefanowska, K.; Woźniak, M.; Dobrucka, R.; Ratajczak, I. Chitosan with Natural Additives as a Potential Food Packaging. Materials 2023, 16, 1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Tong, L. Production and Properties of Starch: Current Research. Molecules 2024, 29, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franco, T.S.; de Muniz, G.B.; Lomelí-Ramírez, M.G.; Rangel, B.S.; Jiménez-Amezcua, R.M.; Mijares, E.M.; García-Enríquez, S.; Rentería-Urquiza, M. Nanocellulose and Its Application in the Food Industry. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2023, 28, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pournaki, S.K.; Aleman, R.S.; Hasani-Azhdari, M.; Marcia, J.; Yadav, A.; Moncada, M. Current Review: Alginate in the Food Applications. J 2024, 7, 281–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, C.; Wang, C.; Fu, S. Food Protein Nanofibril Gels: From Conditions, Types and Properties to Applications. Foods 2024, 13, 2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balla, E.; Daniilidis, V.; Karlioti, G.; Kalamas, T.; Stefanidou, M.; Bikiaris, N.D.; Vlachopoulos, A.; Koumentakou, I.; Bikiaris, D.N. Poly(lactic Acid): A Versatile Biobased Polymer for the Future with Multifunctional Properties—From Monomer Synthesis, Polymerization Techniques and Molecular Weight Increase to PLA Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dechy-Cabaret, O.; Martin-Vaca, B.; Bourissou, D. Controlled ring-opening polymerization of lactide and glycolide. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 6147–6176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helanto, K.; Matikainen, L.; Talja, R.; Rojas, O.J. Bio-based Polymers for Sustainable Packaging and Biobarriers: A Critical Review. BioResources 2019, 14, 4902–4951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colomines, G.; Ducruet, V.; Courgneau, Ć.; Guinault, A.; Domenek, S. Barrier properties of poly(lactic acid) and its morphological changes induced by aroma compound sorption. Polym. Int. 2010, 59, 818–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vahabi, H.; Rohani Rad, E.; Parpaite, T.; Langlois, V.; Saeb, M.R. Biodegradable Polyester Thin Films and Coatings in the Line of Fire: The Time of Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA)? Prog. Org. Coat. 2019, 133, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bugnicourt, E.; Cinelli, P.; Lazzeri, A.; Alvarez, V. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA): Review of synthesis, characteristics, processing and potential applications in packaging. Express Polym. Lett. 2014, 8, 791–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mai, J.; Kockler, K.; Parisi, E.; Chan, C.M.; Pratt, S.; Laycock, B. Synthesis and physical properties of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA)-based block copolymers: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 242, 130204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Hadi, A.; Schnabel, R.; Straube, E.; Müller, G.; Henning, S. Correlation between Degree of Crystallinity, Morphology, Glass Temperature, Mechanical Properties and Biodegradation of Poly (3-Hydroxyalkanoate) PHAs and Their Blends. Polym. Test. 2002, 21, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, X.; Chen, E.Y.X. Toward Infinitely Recyclable Plastics Derived from Renewable Cyclic Esters. Chem 2019, 5, 284–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornille, A.; Auvergne, R.; Figovsky, O.; Boutevin, B.; Caillol, S. A perspective approach to sustainable routes for non-isocyanate polyurethanes. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 87, 535–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rokicki, G.; Parzuchowski, P.G.; Mazurek, M. Non-isocyanate polyurethanes: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2015, 26, 707–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khatoon, H.; Iqbal, S.; Irfan, M.; Darda, A.; Rawat, N.K. A review on the production, properties and applications of non-isocyanate polyurethane: A greener perspective. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 155, 106124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catalá, J.; Guerra, I.; García-Vargas, J.M.; Ramos, M.J.; García, M.T.; Rodríguez, J.F. Tailor-Made Bio-Based Non-Isocyanate Polyurethanes (NIPUs). Polymers 2023, 15, 1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozimek, J.; Pielichowski, K. Sustainability of Nonisocyanate Polyurethanes (NIPUs). Sustainability 2024, 16, 9911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marturano, V.; Marotta, A.; Salazar, S.A.; Ambrogi, V.; Cerruti, P. Recent advances in bio-based functional additives for polymers. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2023, 134, 101186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bizet, B.; Grau, E.; Asua, J.M.; Cramail, H. Hybrid Nonisocyanate Polyurethanes (H-NIPUs): A Pathway towards a Broad Range of Novel Materials. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2022, 223, 2100437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Oqla, F.; Sapuan, S. Advanced Processing, Properties, and Applications of Starch and Other Bio-Based Polymers; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; Available online: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=L6DhDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=m6DDZmcxiK&sig=CtXP7k02wRhVkEmIy5F0CuAgS44 (accessed on 30 August 2024).
- Naser, A.Z.; Deiab, I.; Darras, B.M. Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), green alternatives to petroleum-based plastics: A review. R. Soc. Chem. 2021, 11, 40381–40413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dutta, D.; Sit, N. A comprehensive review on types and properties of biopolymers as sustainable bio-based alternatives for packaging. Food Biomacromol. 2024, 1, 58–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katanyoota, P.; Jariyasakoolroj, P.; Sane, A. Mechanical and barrier properties of simultaneous biaxially stretched polylactic acid/thermoplastic starch/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) films. Polym. Bull. 2023, 80, 5219–5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Cao, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Ren, W.; Wang, B.; Cai, D. Non-isocyanate polyurethane from sweet potato residual and the application in food preservation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 186, 115224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díez-Pascual, A.M.; Díez-Vicente, A.L. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/ZnO bionanocomposites with improved mechanical, barrier and antibacterial properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 10950–10973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrade-Del Olmo, J.; Pérez-Álvarez, L.; Hernáez, E.; Ruiz-Rubio, L.; Vilas-Vilela, J.L. Antibacterial multilayer of chitosan and (2-carboxyethyl)-β-cyclodextrin onto polylactic acid (PLLA). Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 88, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rebocho, A.T.; Pereira, J.R.; Freitas, F.; Neves, L.A.; Alves, V.D.; Sevrin, C.; Grandfils, C.; Reis, M.A. Production of Medium-Chain Length Polyhydroxyalkanoates by Pseudomonas citronellolis Grown in Apple Pulp Waste. Appl. Food Biotechnol. 2019, 6, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de la Rosa-Ramírez, H.; Dominici, F.; Ferri, J.M.; Luzi, F.; Puglia, D.; Torre, L.; López-Martínez, J.; Samper, M.D. Pentaerythritol and Glycerol Esters Derived from Gum Rosin as Bio-Based Additives for the Improvement of Processability and Thermal Stability of Polylactic Acid. J. Polym. Environ. 2023, 31, 5446–5461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swarupa, S.; Thareja, P. Techniques, applications and prospects of polysaccharide and protein based biopolymer coatings: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 253, 131104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suhag, R.; Kumar, N.; Petkoska, A.T.; Upadhyay, A. Film formation and deposition methods of edible coating on food products: A review. Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reddy Nagavally, R. Composite materials—History, types, fabrication techniques, advantages, and applications. In Proceedings of the 29th IRF International Conference, Bengaluru, India, 24 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Krstić, M.; Radojević, M.; Stojanović, D.; Radojević, V.; Uskoković, P.; Ibrić, S. Formulation and characterization of nanofibers and films with carvedilol prepared by electrospinning and solution casting method. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 101, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deshmukh, R.K.; Kumar, L.; Gaikwad, K.K. Halloysite nanotubes for food packaging application: A review. Appl. Clay Sci. 2023, 236, 106856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukhopadhyay, R.; Kazi, J.; Debnath, M.C. Synthesis and characterization of copper nanoparticles stabilized with Quisqualis indica extract: Evaluation of its cytotoxicity and apoptosis in B16F10 melanoma cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 97, 1373–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espitia, P.J.P.; Du, W.X.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; Soares, N.F.F.; McHugh, T.H. Edible films from pectin: Physical-mechanical and antimicrobial properties. A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 35, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prete, S.; Dattilo, M.; Patitucci, F.; Pezzi, G.; Parisi, O.I.; Puoci, F. Natural and Synthetic Polymeric Biomaterials for Application in Wound Management. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhim, J.W.; Mohanty, A.K.; Singh, S.P.; Ng, P.K.W. Effect of the processing methods on the performance of polylactide films: Thermocompression versus solvent casting. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 101, 3736–3742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Jiang, S.; Chen, Y.; Qiu, D.; Weng, Y. Synthesis and Characterization of a Novel Composite Edible Film Based on Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose Grafted with Gelatin. Gels 2023, 9, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, N.A.S.; Mohamad, Z.; Khan, Z.I.; Jusoh, M.; Zakaria, Z.Y.; Ngadi, N. Alginate based sustainable films and composites for packaging: A review. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2021, 83, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goh, C.H.; Heng, P.W.S.; Chan, L.W. Alginates as a useful natural polymer for microencapsulation and therapeutic applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 88, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchez-García, M.D. Carrageenan polysaccharides for food packaging. In Multifunctional and Nanoreinforced Polymers for Food Packaging; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 594–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sree, S.; Patra, A.; Arun Prasath, V.; Kambhampati, V.; Xiao, H. Innovations in Electrospinning Techniques for Nanomaterial Synthesis and Its Applications in the Field of Active Food Packaging. J. Futur. Foods, 2025; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Li, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhang, H. Electrospinning of nanofibers: Potentials and perspectives for active food packaging. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 479–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, S. Progress in fabrication of one-dimensional catalytic materials by electrospinning technology. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2021, 93, 28–56. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1226086X20304202 (accessed on 23 July 2024). [CrossRef]
- Sill, T.J.; von Recum, H.A. Electrospinning: Applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 1989–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aurazo, F.; Asto, E.; Hurtado, F. Identification and Estimation of the Taylor Cone in Electrospinning Technique Using the Yolo Network. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 31st International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing, INTERCON 2024, Lima, Peru, 6–8 November 2024; IEEE: Lima, Peru, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.; Pan, W.; Lin, D.; Li, H. Electrospinning of ceramic nanofibers: Fabrication, assembly and applications. J. Adv. Ceram. 2012, 1, 2–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darwish, M.S.A.; Mostafa, M.H.; Al-Harbi, L.M. Polymeric Nanocomposites for Environmental and Industrial Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mihindukulasuriya, S.D.F.; Lim, L.T. Nanotechnology development in food packaging: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 40, 149–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Rubio, A.; Lagaron, J.M. Whey protein capsules obtained through electrospraying for the encapsulation of bioactives. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2012, 13, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kausar, A. Polymer coating technology for high performance applications: Fundamentals and advances. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A 2018, 55, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, B.A.; de Albuquerque, P.B.S.; de Souza, M.P. Bio-based Films and Coatings: Sustainable Polysaccharide Packaging Alternatives for the Food Industry. J. Polym. Environ. 2022, 30, 4023–4039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bishop, J.E.; Routledge, T.J.; Lidzey, D.G. Advances in Spray-Cast Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 1977–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, M.J.; Baishya, H.; Gupta, R.K.; Garai, R.; Iyer, P.K. Thin Film Solution Processable Perovskite Solar Cell. In Recent Advances in Multifunctional Perovskite Materials; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022; Available online: www.intechopen.com (accessed on 6 January 2025).
- Colella, S.; Mazzeo, M.; Melcarne, G.; Carallo, S.; Ciccarella, G.; Gigli, G. Spray coating fabrication of organic solar cells bypassing the limit of orthogonal solvents. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, Y.J.; Kim, C.S.; Kim, D.G.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, S.H.; Kang, J.W. Fully spray-coated inverted organic solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2011, 103, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Girotto, C.; Rand, B.P.; Genoe, J.; Heremans, P. Exploring spray coating as a deposition technique for the fabrication of solution-processed solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2009, 93, 454–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, R.; Morfa, A.; Ferguson, A.J.; Kopidakis, N.; Rumbles, G.; Shaheen, S.E. Performance of bulk heterojunction photovoltaic devices prepared by airbrush spray deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.H.; Yoshikawa, S.; Sagawa, T. Fabrication of bulk heterojunction solar cells by a modified spray-mist coating method. Renew. Energy Power Qual. J. 2013, 11, 366–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lafleur, P.; Vergnes, B. Polymer Extrusion; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; Available online: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=3xqNAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP6&dq=Polymer+Extrusion&ots=W_PAICAhcN&sig=sXtNG2LY9mqfXiIPqwTw_XakSsE (accessed on 7 January 2025).
- Gaspar-Cunha, A.; Covas, J.A.; Sikora, J. Optimization of Polymer Processing: A Review (Part I—Extrusion). Materials 2022, 15, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steel, C.J.; Gabriela, M.; Leoro, V.; Schmiele, M.; Ferreira, R.E.; Chang, Y.K. Thermoplastic Extrusion in Food Processing. In Food Engineering; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2012; Available online: www.intechopen.com (accessed on 10 January 2025).
- Choton, S.; Gupta, N.; Bandral, J.D.; Anjum, N.; Choudary, A. Extrusion technology and its application in food processing: A review. Pharma Innov. J. 2020, 9, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woranuch, S.; Yoksan, R. Eugenol-loaded chitosan nanoparticles: II. Application in bio-based plastics for active packaging. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 96, 586–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Camacho, A.P.; Cortez-Rocha, M.O.; Graciano-Verdugo, A.Z.; Rodríguez-Félix, F.; Castillo-Ortega, M.M.; Burgos-Hernández, A.; Ezquerra-Brauer, J.M. Extruded films of blended chitosan, low density polyethylene and ethylene acrylic acid. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 91, 666–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Charles, A.L.; Motsa, N.; Abdillah, A.A. A Comprehensive Characterization of Biodegradable Edible Films Based on Potato Peel Starch Plasticized with Glycerol. Polymers 2022, 14, 3462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pokharel, A.; Falua, K.J.; Babaei-Ghazvini, A.; Acharya, B. Biobased Polymer Composites: A Review. J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tatara, R.A. Compression Molding. In Applied Plastics Engineering Handbook; Kutz, M., Ed.; William Andrew Publishing, Elsevier: Norwich, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 389–424. ISBN 978032388667. [Google Scholar]
- Dumont, P.; Martoïa, F.; Orgéas, L. Compression Moulding. In Design and Manufacture of Structural Composites; Harper, L., Clifford, M., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 273–300. ISBN 978-0-12-819160-6. [Google Scholar]
- Fu, H.; Xu, H.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Kormakov, S.; Wu, D.; Sun, J. Overview of injection molding technology for processing polymers and their composites. ES Mater. Manuf. 2020, 8, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodship, V. Introduction to Plastics Recycling. 2007. Available online: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ocoQM7cnQTwC&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=%E2%80%A2%09Goodship,+V.+(2017).+Introduction+to+Plastics+Recycling.+Smithers+Rapra.&ots=DPL1WY8gA6&sig=siCc1JcIGbfoHRRqK-tKSAQZHkQ (accessed on 30 July 2024).
- Flórez, M.; Cazón, P.; Vázquez, M. Selected Biopolymers’ Processing and Their Applications: A Review. Polymers 2023, 15, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Advani, S.; Sozer, E. Process Modeling in Composites Manufacturing. 2002. Available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9780203910061/process-modeling-composites-manufacturing-suresh-advani-murat-sozer (accessed on 30 July 2024).
- Ortega-Toro, R.; Jiménez, A.; Talens, P.; Chiralt, A. Properties of starch-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose based films obtained by compression molding. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 109, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tay, Y.W.D.; Panda, B.; Paul, S.C.; Tan, M.J.; Qian, S.Z.; Leong, K.F.; Chua, C.K. Processing and properties of construction materials for 3D printing. Mater. Sci. Forum 2016, 861, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quan, H.; Zhang, T.; Xu, H.; Luo, S.; Nie, J.; Zhu, X. Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges. Bioact. Mater. 2020, 5, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Severini, C.; Derossi, A.; Azzollini, D. Variables affecting the printability of foods: Preliminary tests on cereal-based products. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 38, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godoi, F.C.; Prakash, S.; Bhandari, B.R. 3d printing technologies applied for food design: Status and prospects. J. Food Eng. 2016, 179, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nachal, N.; Moses, J.A.; Karthik, P.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Applications of 3D Printing in Food Processing. Food Eng. Rev. 2019, 11, 123–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Zhou, W.; Huang, D.; Fuh, J.Y.H.; Hong, G.S. An Overview of 3D Printing Technologies for Food Fabrication. Food Bioprocess. Technol. 2015, 8, 1605–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J. A 3D Food Printing Process for the New Normal Era: A Review. Processes 2021, 9, 1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibson, I.; Rosen, D.; Stucker, B.; Khorasani, M. Additive Manufacturing Technologies; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrzejewski, J.; Grad, K.; Wiśniewski, W.; Szulc, J. The Use of Agricultural Waste in the Modification of Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Composites Intended for 3D Printing Applications. The Use of Toughened Blend Systems to Improve Mechanical Properties. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, J.; Yu, X.; Shen, Y.; Sun, B.; Guo, W.; Liu, M.; Chen, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, X.; Shafiq, M.; et al. Electrospinning Inorganic Nanomaterials to Fabricate Bionanocomposites for Soft and Hard Tissue Repair. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Wei, J. Application of 3D Printing Technology in Dentistry: A Review. Polymers 2025, 17, 886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajzer, I.; Kurowska, A.; Nikodem, A.; Janusz, J.; Jabłoński, A.; Ziąbka, M.; Menaszek, E.; Frankova, J.; Piekarczyk, W.; Fabia, J. 3D Printing and Electrospinning of Drug- and Graphene-Enhanced Polycaprolactone Scaffolds for Osteochondral Nasal Repair. Materials 2025, 18, 1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akinwamide, S.O.; Abe, B.T.; Akinribide, O.J.; Obadele, B.A.; Olubambi, P.A. Characterization of Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Response of Aluminium-Based Composites Fabricated via Casting. A Review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 111, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olatunji, O. Natural Polymers: Industry Techniques and Applications; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, K.; Deepalekshmi, S.; Mariappan, P.; Ahamed, R.M.B.; Ali, M.; Al-Maadeed, S.A. (Eds.) Polymer Nanocomposites in Biomedical Engineering; Lecture Notes in Bioengineering; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Available online: http://www.springer.com/series/11564 (accessed on 10 March 2025).
- Versino, F.; Lopez, O.V.; Garcia, M.A.; Zaritzky, N.E. Starch-Based Films and Food Coatings: An Overview. Starch-Stärke 2016, 68, 1026–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borbolla-Jiménez, F.V.; Peña-Corona, S.I.; Farah, S.J.; Jiménez-Valdés, M.T.; Pineda-Pérez, E.; Romero-Montero, A.; Del Prado-Audelo, M.L.; Bernal-Chávez, S.A.; Magaña, J.J.; Leyva-Gómez, G. Films for Wound Healing Fabricated Using a Solvent Casting Technique. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhardwaj, N.; Kundu, S.C. Electrospinning: A Fascinating Fiber Fabrication Technique. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 325–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xue, J.; Wu, T.; Dai, Y.; Xia, Y. Electrospinning and Electrospun Nanofibers: Methods, Materials, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 5298–5415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guo, Y.; Wang, X.; Shen, Y.; Dong, K.; Shen, L.; Alzalab, A.A.A. Research Progress, Models and Simulation of Electrospinning Technology: A Review. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 10099–10135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khorshidi, S.; Solouk, A.; Mirzadeh, H.; Mazinani, S.; Lagaron, J.M.; Sharifi, S.; Ramakrishna, S. A review of key challenges of electrospun scaffolds for tissue-engineering applications. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2016, 10, 715–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amin, S.; Panchal, H. A Review on Thermal Spray Coating Processes. Int. J. Curr. Trends Eng. Res. 2016, 2, 514–518. Available online: http://www.ijcter.com (accessed on 10 March 2025).
- Shelar, G.A.; Gaikwad, S.T. Extrusion in Food Processing: An Overview. Pharma Innov. J. 2019, 8, 562–568. Available online: www.thepharmajournal.com (accessed on 10 March 2025).
- Offiah, V.; Kontogiorgos, V.; Falade, K.O. Extrusion Processing of Raw Food Materials and By-Products: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 2979–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shamsuri, A.A. Compression Moulding Technique for Manufacturing Biocomposite Products. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 19–25. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362593262 (accessed on 12 March 2025).
- Jaafar, J.; Siregar, J.P.; Tezara, C.; Hamdan, M.H.M.; Rihayat, T. A Review of Important Considerations in the Compression Molding Process of Short Natural Fiber Composites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 105, 3437–3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Feng, T.; Lu, T.; Zhao, F.; Zhao, J.; Guo, W.; Hua, L. Optimization of Compression Molding Parameters and Lifecycle Carbon Impact Assessment of Bamboo Fiber-Reinforced Polypropylene Composites. Polymers 2024, 16, 3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadagouda, M.N.; Ginn, M.; Rastogi, V. A Review of 3D Printing Techniques for Environmental Applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2020, 28, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngo, T.D.; Kashani, A.; Imbalzano, G.; Nguyen, K.T.Q.; Hui, D. Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges. Compos. B Eng. 2018, 143, 172–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, S.; Ahmed, A.; Basha, D.B.; Hussain, S.; Uddin, I.; Gondal, M.A. Critical review on recent developments in conducting polymer nanocomposites for supercapacitors. Synth. Met. 2023, 295, 117326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okpala, C.C. Nanocomposites: An Overview. Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev. 2013, 7, 57–62. Available online: www.ijerd.com (accessed on 12 March 2025).
- Youssef, A.M. Polymer Nanocomposites as a New Trend for Packaging Applications. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2013, 52, 635–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pomogailo, A.D. Synthesis and Intercalation Chemistry of Hybrid Organo-Inorganic Nanocomposites. Polym. Sci. Ser. C 2006, 48, 85–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mittal, V. Characterization Techniques for Polymer Nanocomposites, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Harito, C.; Bavykin, D.V.; Yuliarto, B.; Dipojono, H.K.; Walsh, F.C. Polymer Nanocomposites Having a High Filler Content: Synthesis, Structures, Properties, and Applications. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 4653–4682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Njuguna, J.; Ansari, F.; Sachse, S.; Rodriguez, V.M.; Siqqique, S.; Zhu, H. Nanomaterials, Nanofillers, and Nanocomposites: Types and Properties. In Health and Environmental Safety of Nanomaterials: Polymer Nanocomposites and Other Materials Containing Nanoparticles; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 3–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, K.; Bugnicourt, E.; Latorre, M.; Jorda, M.; Echegoyen Sanz, Y.; Lagaron, J.M.; Miesbauer, O.; Bianchin, A.; Hankin, S.; Bölz, U.; et al. Review on the Processing and Properties of Polymer Nanocomposites and Nanocoatings and Their Applications in the Packaging, Automotive and Solar Energy Fields. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Silberbauer, A.; Schmid, M. Packaging Concepts for Ready-to-Eat Food: Recent Progress. J. Packag. Technol. Res. 2017, 1, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, L.; Yang, G.D.; Zeng, G.M.; Cai, Y.; Li, S.S.; Zhou, Y.Y.; Pang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Luna, B. Synergistic effect of iron doped ordered mesoporous carbon on adsorption-coupled reduction of hexavalent chromium and the relative mechanism study. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 239, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khezri, K.; Mahdavi, H. Polystyrene–Silica Aerogel Nanocomposites by In Situ Simultaneous Reverse and Normal Initiation Technique for ATRP. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 228, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Moura, M.R.; Aouada, F.A.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; McHugh, T.H.; Krochta, J.M.; Mattoso, L.H.C. Improved Barrier and Mechanical Properties of Novel Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Edible Films with Chitosan/Tripolyphosphate Nanoparticles. J. Food Eng. 2009, 92, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fortunati, E.; Peltzer, M.; Armentano, I.; Torre, L.; Jiménez, A.; Kenny, J.M. Effects of Modified Cellulose Nanocrystals on the Barrier and Migration Properties of PLA Nano-Biocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 90, 948–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramanathan, T.; Abdala, A.A.; Stankovich, S.; Dikin, D.A.; Herrera-Alonso, M.; Piner, R.D.; Adamson, D.H.; Schniepp, H.C.; Chen, X.; Ruoff, R.S.; et al. Functionalized Graphene Sheets for Polymer Nanocomposites. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, W.; Fortunati, E.; Yang, W.; Fortunati, E.; Dominici, F.; Giovanale, G.; Mazzaglia, A.; Balestra, G.M.; Kenny, J.M.; Puglia, D. Synergic Effect of Cellulose and Lignin Nanostructures in PLA Based Systems for Food Antibacterial Packaging. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 79, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; Wei, M.; Chen, J.; Huang, J.; Dufresne, A.; Chang, P.R. Simultaneous Reinforcing and Toughening: New Nanocomposites of Waterborne Polyurethane Filled with Low Loading Level of Starch Nanocrystals. Polymer 2008, 49, 1860–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, G.K.; Mitra, J. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle Synthesis, Characterization, and Their Effect on Mechanical, Barrier, and Optical Properties of HPMC-Based Edible Film. J. Food Process Eng. 2021, 44, e13566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabir, E.; Kaur, R.; Lee, J.; Kim, K.H.; Kwon, E.E. Prospects of Biopolymer Technology as an Alternative Option for Non-Degradable Plastics and Sustainable Management of Plastic Wastes. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 258, 120536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vroman, I.; Tighzert, L. Biodegradable Polymers. Materials 2009, 2, 307–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samir, A.; Ashour, F.; Hakim, A. Recent Advances in Biodegradable Polymers for Sustainable Applications. npj Mater. Degrad. 2022, 6, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhumal, C.V.; Sarkar, P. Composite Edible Films and Coatings from Food-Grade Biopolymers. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 3613–3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shamsuri, A.A.; Nurul, S.; Jamil, A.M.; Abdan, K.; Vannini, M.; Sisti, L. A Brief Review on the Influence of Ionic Liquids on the Mechanical, Thermal, and Chemical Properties of Biodegradable Polymer Composites. Polymers 2021, 13, 2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aničić, N.; Kurtjak, M.; Jeverica, S.; Suvorov, D.; Vukomanović, M. Antimicrobial Polymeric Composites with Embedded Nanotextured Magnesium Oxide. Polymers 2021, 13, 2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maruddin, F.; Malaka, R.; Baba, S.; Amqam, H.; Taufik, M.; Sabil, S. Brightness, Elongation and Thickness of Edible Film with Caseinate Sodium Using a Type of Plasticizer. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020; Volume 492, p. 012043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponnusamy, P.G.; Mani, S. Material and Environmental Properties of Natural Polymers and Their Composites for Packaging Applications. A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 4033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondragon, G.; Peña-Rodriguez, C.; González, A.; Eceiza, A.; Arbelaiz, A. Bionanocomposites Based on Gelatin Matrix and Nanocellulose. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 62, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kunam, P.K.; Ramakanth, D.; Akhila, K.; Gaikwad, K.K. Bio-Based Materials for Barrier Coatings on Paper Packaging. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2024, 14, 2251–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weber, C. Biobased Packaging Materials for the Food Industry: Status and Perspectives, a European Concerted Action. AGROVOC Database. 2000. Available online: https://agris.fao.org/search/en/providers/122465/records/647235d053aa8c896302456a (accessed on 22 April 2024).
- Figovsky, O.; Shapovalov, L.; Beilin, D.; Leykin, A. Recent Advances in the Development of Non-Isocyanate Polyurethanes Based on Cyclic Carbonates. 2013. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261363031 (accessed on 20 March 2025).
- Asim, Z.; Shah, M.U.; Pasha, M.; Qureshi, R.; Kousar, N.; Rehman, A.; Kousar, S. Significance of Sustainable Packaging: A Case-Study from a Supply Chain Perspective. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2022, 5, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, H.; Xu, H.; McClements, D.J.; Chen, L.; Jiao, A.; Tian, Y.; Miao, M.; Jin, Z. Recent Advances in Intelligent Food Packaging Materials: Principles, Preparation and Applications. Food Chem. 2022, 375, 131738. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814621027448 (accessed on 20 March 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Las-Casas, B.; Arantes, V. From Production to Performance: Tailoring Moisture and Oxygen Barrier of Cellulose Nanomaterials for Sustainable Applications—A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 334, 122012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Qian, J.; Ding, F. Emerging Chitosan-Based Films for Food Packaging Applications. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 395–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raveh, A.; Zukerman, I.; Shneck, R.; Avni, R.; Fried, I. Thermal Stability of Nanostructured Superhard Coatings: A Review. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2007, 201, 6136–6144. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0257897206009509 (accessed on 22 March 2025). [CrossRef]
- Liang, N.; Zhao, Y. A Review on Thermal Stability of Nanostructured Materials. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 944, 168528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asim, M.; Abdan, K.; Jawaid, M.; Nasir, M.; Dashtizadeh, Z.; Ishak, M.R.; Hoque, M.E. Thermal Stability of Natural Fibers and Their Polymer Composites. Iran. Polym. J. 2020, 29, 625–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Väisänen, T.; Das, O.; Lommpo, R.; Laukkanen, A.; Yang, W. A Review on New Bio-Based Constituents for Natural Fiber-Polymer Composites. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 149, 582–596. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965261730358X (accessed on 24 March 2025). [CrossRef]
- Rastogi, V.K.; Samyn, P. Bio-Based Coatings for Paper Applications. Coatings 2015, 5, 887–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guigo, N.; Künkel, A.; Müssig, J.; Michel, S.; Pollet, E. Thermal Analysis of Biobased Polymers and Composites. In Thermal Analysis in Practice; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Chapter 2; Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444640628000024 (accessed on 24 March 2025).
- Lin, Y.; Bilotti, E.; Bastiaansen, C.W.M.; Peijs, T. Transparent Semi-Crystalline Polymeric Materials and Their Nanocomposites: A Review. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2020, 60, 2326–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, R.; Goddard, N.J. Leaky Waveguides (LWs) for Chemical and Biological Sensing—A Review and Future Perspective. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 325, 128628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Tang, F.Y.; Cheung, C.; Chen, X.; Chen, H. Different Effect of Media Opacity on Automated and Manual Measurement of Foveal Avascular Zone of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiographies. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 105, 812–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafarzadeh, S.; Jafari, S.M. Impact of Metal Nanoparticles on the Mechanical, Barrier, Optical and Thermal Properties of Biodegradable Food Packaging Materials. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 2021–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ezati, P.; Khan, A.; Priyadarshi, R.; Bhattacharya, T.; Tammina, S.K.; Rhim, J.W. Biopolymer-Based UV Protection Functional Films for Food Packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 144, 108771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duncan, S.E.; Chang, H.H. Implications of Light Energy on Food Quality and Packaging Selection. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2012, 67, 25–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, F.; Pham, D.T.N.; Oloketuyi, S.F.; Manivasagan, P.; Oh, J.; Kim, Y.M. Chitosan and Their Derivatives: Antibiofilm Drugs against Pathogenic Bacteria. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2020, 185, 110627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Xu, H.; Wu, M.; Yu, D. Nanofibers-Based Food Packaging. ES Food Agrofor. 2021, 5, 15–25. Available online: https://www.espublisher.com/journals/articledetails/598 (accessed on 23 July 2024). [CrossRef]
- Mwelase, S.; Fawole, O.A. Effect of Chitosan-24-Epibrassinolide Composite Coating on the Quality Attributes of Late-Harvested Pomegranate Fruit under Simulated Commercial Storage Conditions. Plants 2022, 11, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolotov, V.M.; Savvin, P.N.; Komarova, E.V.; Koshevarova, I.B. Effect of Natural Carotenoids and Anthocyanins on Properties of Healthy Food Products. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 640, 052001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nabi, B.G.; Mukhtar, K.; Ahmed, W.; Manzoor, M.F.; Ranjha, M.M.A.N.; Kieliszek, M.; Bhat, Z.F.; Aadil, R.M. Natural Pigments: Anthocyanins, Carotenoids, Chlorophylls, and Betalains as Colorants in Food Products. Food Biosci. 2023, 52, 102403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiedmann, K.P.; Haase, J.; Bettels, J.; Reuschenbach, C. It’s Not All about Function: Investigating the Effects of Visual Appeal on the Evaluation of Industrial Products Using the Example of Product Color. J. Prod. Brand. Manag. 2019, 28, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poisson, J.; Zhang, K. Unique Optical Properties of Cellulosic Materials. Acc. Mater. Res. 2024, 5, 920–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pal, K.; Bharti, D.; Sarkar, P.; Anis, A.; Kim, D.; Chałas, R.; Maksymiuk, P.; Stachurski, P.; Jarzębski, M. Selected Applications of Chitosan Composites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Qin, Z.; Ma, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, X. Cellulose-Based Films for Food Packaging Applications: Review of Preparation, Properties, and Prospects. J. Renew. Mater. 2023, 11, 1231–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nitikornwarakul, C.; Wangpradid, R.; Rakkapao, N. Impact of Molar Composition on the Functional Properties of Glutinous Rice Starch–Chitosan Blend: Natural-Based Active Coating for Extending Mango Shelf Life. Polymers 2024, 16, 1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bustamante-Torres, M.; Arcentales-Vera, B.; Estrella-Nuñez, J.; Yánez-Vega, H.; Bucio, E. Antimicrobial Activity of Composites-Based on Biopolymers. Macromol 2022, 2, 258–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benabid, F.Z.; Zouai, F.; Benabid, F.Z.; Zouai, F. Algerian Journal of Natural Products. Alger. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 4, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz-Bonilla, A.; Echeverria, C.; Sonseca, Á.; Arrieta, M.P.; Fernández-García, M. Bio-Based Polymers with Antimicrobial Properties towards Sustainable Development. Materials 2019, 12, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harugade, A.; Sherje, A.P.; Pethe, A. Chitosan: A review on properties, biological activities and recent progress in biomedical applications. React. Funct. Polym. 2023, 189, 105634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Victor, R.S.D.; Santos, A.M.C.; Sousa, B.V.; Neves, G.A.; Santana, L.N.L.; Menezes, R.R. A review on Chitosan’s uses as biomaterial: Tissue engineering, drug delivery systems and cancer treatment. Materials 2020, 13, 4995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zia, K.M. Regulatory Status and Clinical Trials of Chitosan and Derivatives. In Chitosan and Chitosan-Based Materials for Biomedical Applications; Springer: Singapore, 2025; pp. 115–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giessen, A. Herstellung Wasserfester Funktionaler Nanofasern Durch Elektrospinnen Wässriger Formulierungen. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Leceta, I.; Guerrero, P.; De La Caba, K. Functional properties of chitosan-based films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 93, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flórez, M.; Guerra-Rodríguez, E.; Cazón, P.; Vázquez, M. Chitosan for food packaging: Recent advances in active and intelligent films. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 125, 107328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, D.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, N.; Zhang, X.; Yan, C. Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and chitosan derivatives in the treatment of enteric infections. Molecules 2021, 26, 7136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Cheng, J.; Ao, Q. Preparation of Alginate-Based Biomaterials and Their Applications in Biomedicine. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, J.; Leng, X.; Zang, J.; Zhao, G. Bio-based antibacterial food packaging films and coatings containing cinnamaldehyde: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Benbettaïeb, N.; Debeaufort, F.; Karbowiak, T. Bioactive edible films for food applications: Mechanisms of antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 3431–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Istiqomah, A.; Prasetyo, W.E.; Firdaus, M.; Kusumaningsih, T. Valorisation of lemongrass essential oils onto chitosan-starch film for sustainable active packaging: Greatly enhanced antibacterial and antioxidant activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 210, 669–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Q.; Hossen, M.A.; Zeng, Y.; Dai, J.; Li, S.; Qin, W.; Liu, Y. Gelatin-based composite films and their application in food packaging: A review. J. Food Eng. 2022, 310, 110762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, Y.; Chen, M.; Warner, R.D.; Fang, Z. Incorporating nisin and grape seed extract in chitosan-gelatine edible coating and its effect on cold storage of fresh pork. Food Control 2020, 110, 107018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vishweshwaraiah, Y.L.; Acharya, A.; Hegde, V.; Prakash, B. Rational design of hyperstable antibacterial peptides for food preservation. npj Sci. Food 2021, 5, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perumal Pillai, B.; Balasubramaniam, B.; Gupta, R.K.; Tyagi, A. Bio-based materials for antimicrobial films in food applications: Beyond the COVID-19 pandemic era. Oxford Open Mater. Sci. 2023, 3, itad016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sung, S.Y.; Sin, L.T.; Tee, T.T.; Bee, S.T.; Rahmat, A.R.; Rahman, W.A.W.A.; Tan, A.; Vikhraman, M. Antimicrobial agents for food packaging applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 33, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fadiji, T.; Rashvand, M.; Daramola, M.O.; Iwarere, S.A. A Review on Antimicrobial Packaging for Extending the Shelf Life of Food. Processes 2023, 11, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, J.; Zhao, Y. Antimicrobial Packaging for Fresh and Minimally Processed Fruits and Vegetables. In Antimicrobial Food Packaging; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, Y.; Li, X.; Guo, X.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; Liu, Q.; Xu, Q.; Wang, Q.; Yang, H.; Shui, Y.; et al. Effects of Different TiO2 Nanoparticles Concentrations on the Physical and Antibacterial Activities of Chitosan-Based Coating Film. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syafiq, R.; Sapuan, S.; Zuhri, M.; Ilyas, R.; Nazrin, A.; Sherwani, S.F.K.; Khalina, A. Antimicrobial activities of starch-based biopolymers and biocomposites incorporated with plant essential oils: A review. Polymers 2020, 12, 2403. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/10/2403 (accessed on 23 July 2024). [CrossRef]
- Perricone, M.; Arace, E.; Corbo, M.R.; Sinigaglia, M.; Bevilacqua, A. Bioactivity of Essential Oils: A Review on Their Interaction with Food Components. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Sawi, S.; Ibrahim, M.; El-Rokiek, K.G.; El-Din, S.A.S. Allelopathic potential of essential oils isolated from peels of three citrus species. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2019, 64, 133–139. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0570178319300053 (accessed on 30 March 2025). [CrossRef]
- Krepker, M.; Shemesh, R.; Danin-Poleg, Y.; Kashi, Y.; Vaxman, A.; Segal, E. Active food packaging films with synergistic antimicrobial activity. Food Control 2017, 76, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azizi-Lalabadi, M.; Garavand, F.; Jafari, S.M. Incorporation of silver nanoparticles into active antimicrobial nanocomposites: Release behavior, analyzing techniques, applications and safety issues. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2021, 294, 102440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fortunati, E.; Rinaldi, S.; Peltzer, M.; Bloise, N.; Visai, L.; Armentano, I.; Jiménez, A.; Latterini, L.; Kenny, J.M. Nano-biocomposite films with modified cellulose nanocrystals and synthesized silver nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 1122–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Daskalakis, N.; Jeuken, L.; Povey, M.; O’Neill, A.J.; York, D.W. Mechanistic investigation into antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles against E. coli. J. Nanopart. Res. 2010, 12, 1625–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mlalila, N.; Hilonga, A.; Swai, H.; Devlieghere, F.; Ragaert, P. Antimicrobial packaging based on starch, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and poly(lactic-co-glycolide) materials and application challenges. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 72, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leta, T.B.; Adeyemi, J.O.; Fawole, O.A. Characterization of banana powder-based film reinforced with CNF and Bio-mediated ZnO nanoparticles for potential food applications. Mater. Res. Express 2024, 11, 055301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fasihnia, S.H.; Peighambardoust, S.H.; Peighambardoust, S.J.; Oromiehie, A. Development of novel active polypropylene based packaging films containing different concentrations of sorbic acid. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 18, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azarakhsh, N.; Osman, A.; Ghazali, H.M.; Tan, C.P.; Mohd Adzahan, N. Lemongrass essential oil incorporated into alginate-based edible coating for shelf-life extension and quality retention of fresh-cut pineapple. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 88, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, H.; Ahuja, A.; Sharma, B.; Kulshreshtha, A.; Kadam, A.; Dutt, D. Vapor Phase Antimicrobial Active Packaging Application of Chitosan Capsules Containing Clove Essential Oil for the Preservation of Dry Cakes. Food Bioproc. Technol. 2024, 17, 780–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S. Characterization of silver nanoparticles. In Polymer Nanocomposites Based on Silver Nanoparticles, Synthesis, Characterization and Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 83–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Y.; Deng, Y.; Wang, M.; Li, C.; Xie, P.; Sun, B.; Yang, Y.; Lang, Y. Effect of chitosan-gelatine edible coating containing nano-encapsulated clove ethanol extract on cold storage of chilled pork. Meat Sci. 2023, 204, 109288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GhavamiNejad, A.; Ashammakhi, N.; Wu, X.Y.; Khademhosseini, A. Crosslinking Strategies for 3D Bioprinting of Polymeric Hydrogels. Small 2020, 16, 2002931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tillet, G.; Boutevin, B.; Ameduri, B. Chemical reactions of polymer crosslinking and post-crosslinking at room and medium temperature. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 191–217. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079670010000912 (accessed on 25 July 2024). [CrossRef]
- Gao, Q.; Kim, B.S.; Gao, G. Advanced Strategies for 3D Bioprinting of Tissue and Organs Analogs Using Alginate Hydrogel Bioinks. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruchet, M.; Melman, A. Fabrication of patterned calcium cross-linked alginate hydrogel films and coatings through reductive cation exchange. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 131, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramdhan, T.; Ching, S.H.; Prakash, S.; Bhandari, B. Physical and mechanical properties of alginate based composite gels. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 104, 14–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kesti, M.; Eberhardt, C.; Pagliccia, G.; Kenkel, D.; Grande, D.; Boss, A.; Zenobi-Wong, M. Bioprinting Complex Cartilaginous Structures with Clinically Compliant Biomaterials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 7406–7417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, X.; Wei, L.; Sun, L.; Xu, Q.; Cao, J.; Li, H.; Pang, Z.; Liu, X. Fabrication of food polysaccharide, protein, and polysaccharide-protein composite gels via calcium ion inducement: Gelation mechanisms, conditional factors, and applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 279, 135397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Demirtaş, T.T.; Irmak, G.; Gümüşderelioğlu, M. A bioprintable form of chitosan hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Biofabrication 2017, 9, 035003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GhavamiNejad, A.; Hashmi, S.; Vatankhah-Varnoosfaderani, M.; Stadler, F.J. Effect of H2O and reduced graphene oxide on the structure and rheology of self-healing, stimuli responsive catecholic gels. Rheol. Acta 2016, 55, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zennifer, A.; Manivannan, S.; Sethuraman, S.; Kumbar, S.G.; Sundaramurthi, D. 3D bioprinting and photocrosslinking: Emerging strategies & future perspectives. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2022, 128, 112576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Ye, W.; Yan, Y. Advances in Photocrosslinkable Materials for 3D Bioprinting. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2022, 24, 2100663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, K.; Gu, Q.; Zhou, D.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, L. Recent progress in surgical adhesives for biomedical applications. Smart Mater. Med. 2022, 3, 177–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.L.; Shen, Y.; Hu, F.; Zhang, X.X.; Thakur, K.; Rengasamy, K.R.; Khan, M.R.; Busquets, R.; Wei, Z. Fortification of polysaccharide-based packaging films and coatings with essential oils: A review of their preparation and use in meat preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242, 124767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, R.; Lin, J.; Zhou, M.; Qin, X.; Wang, K.; Zhang, R.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, Q.; et al. Development of multi-cross-linking, rapid curing, and easy cleaning, edible hydrogels for meat preservation. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 155, 110186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, L.; Liang, Y.; Lin, Z.; Xie, D.; Zheng, Z.; Xu, C.; Lin, B. Design of multifunctional food packaging films based on carboxymethyl chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol crosslinked network by using citric acid as crosslinker. Polymer 2021, 230, 124048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Göksen, G.; Fabra, M.J.; Pérez-Cataluña, A.; Ekiz, H.I.; Sanchez, G.; López-Rubio, A. Biodegradable active food packaging structures based on hybrid cross-linked electrospun polyvinyl alcohol fibers containing essential oils and their application in the preservation of chicken breast fillets. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 27, 100613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, S.; Teoh, Y.L.; Ong, K.M.; Rafflisman Zaidi, N.S.; Mah, S.K. Poly(vinyl) alcohol crosslinked composite packaging film containing gold nanoparticles on shelf life extension of banana. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 24, 100463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakare, M.R.; Wharton, J.A.; Wood, R.J.K.; Menger, C. Exposure effects of alkaline drilling fluid on the microscale abrasion-corrosion of WC-based hardmetals. Wear 2007, 263, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torabinejad, V.; Aliofkhazraei, M.; Assareh, S.; Allahyarzadeh, M.H.; Rouhaghdam, A.S. Electrodeposition of Ni-Fe alloys, composites, and nano coatings—A review. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 691, 841–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorozhkin, S.V. Surface modification of magnesium and its biodegradable alloys by calcium orthophosphate coatings to improve corrosion resistance and biocompatibility. In Surface Modification of Magnesium and Its Alloys for Biomedical Applications; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 2, pp. 151–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sebastiá, P.; Climent, V.; Feliu, J.M. Ionic Liquids in the Field of Metal Electrodeposition. In Encyclopedia of Interfacial Chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.; Dai, C.S.; Wei, J.; Wen, Z.H. Study on the bonding strength between calcium phosphate/chitosan composite coatings and a Mg alloy substrate. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 261, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talib, S.R.J.; Saad, S.; Toff, M.R.M.; Hashim, H. Thermal Spray Coating Technology—A Review. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2003, 11, 109–117. [Google Scholar]
- Abbasi, S.; Golestani-Fard, F.; Rezaie, H.R.; Mirhosseini, S.M.M. MAO-derived hydroxyapatite/TiO2 nanostructured multi-layer coatings on titanium substrate. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 261, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zanurin, A.; Johari, N.A.; Alias, J.; Ayu, H.M.; Redzuan, N.; Izman, S. Research progress of sol-gel ceramic coating: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 48, 1849–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bokov, D.; Turki Jalil, A.; Chupradit, S.; Suksatan, W.; Javed Ansari, M.; Shewael, I.H.; Kianfar, E. Nanomaterial by sol-gel method: Synthesis and application. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1, 5102014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Bierwagen, G.P. Sol-gel coatings on metals for corrosion protection. Prog. Org. Coat. 2009, 64, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seng, D.H.L.; ZHANG, Z.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Meng, T.L.; Teo, S.L.; Tan, B.H.; Loi, Q.; Pan, J. Influence of spray angle in cold spray deposition of Ti-6Al-4V coatings on Al6061-T6 substrates. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 432, 128068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sridhar, S.; Viswanathan, A.; Venkateswarlu, K.; Rameshbabu, N.; Parthasarathi, N.L. Enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity of P-block elements (C, N and F) doped porous TiO2 coatings on Cp-Ti by micro-arc oxidation. J. Porous Mater. 2015, 22, 545–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Séverin, I.; Lionti, K.; Dahbi, L.; Loriot, C.; Toury, B.; Chagnon, M.C. In vitro toxicity assessment of extracts derived from sol-gel coatings on polycarbonate intended to be used in food contact applications. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016, 93, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razavi, R.; Tajik, H.; Moradi, M.; Molaei, R.; Ezati, P. Antimicrobial, microscopic and spectroscopic properties of cellulose paper coated with chitosan sol-gel solution formulated by epsilon-poly-L-lysine and its application in active food packaging. Carbohydr. Res. 2020, 489, 107912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ajermoun, N.; Lahrich, S.; Farahi, A.; Bakasse, M.; Saqrane, S.; El Mhammedi, M.A. Electrodeposition of silver onto carbon graphite and their catalysis properties toward thiamethoxam reduction: Application in food and beverage samples. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atta, O.M.; Manan, S.; Shahzad, A.; Ul-Islam, M.; Ullah, M.W.; Yang, G. Biobased materials for active food packaging: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 125, 107419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parente, A.G.; de Oliveira, H.P.; Cabrera, M.P.; de Morais Neri, D.F. Bio-based polymer films with potential for packaging applications: A systematic review of the main types tested on food. Polym. Bull. 2023, 80, 4689–4717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira-Costa, B.E.; Andrade, C.T. Natural Polymers Used in Edible Food Packaging—History, Function and Application Trends as a Sustainable Alternative to Synthetic Plastic. Polysaccharides 2022, 3, 32–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guimarães, A.; Abrunhosa, L.; Pastrana, L.M.; Cerqueira, M.A. Edible Films and Coatings as Carriers of Living Microorganisms: A New Strategy Towards Biopreservation and Healthier Foods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 594–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos, Ó.L.; Pereira, R.N.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Martins, J.R.; Teixeira, J.A.; Malcata, F.X.; Vicente, A.A. Bio-Based Nanocomposites for Food Packaging and Their Effect in Food Quality and Safety. In Food Packaging and Preservation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 271–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asgher, M.; Qamar, S.A.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H.M.N. Bio-based active food packaging materials: Sustainable alternative to conventional petrochemical-based packaging materials. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Zhang, M.; Li, M.; Lin, J. Fruits and vegetables preservation based on AI technology: Research progress and application prospects. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2024, 226, 109382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giannakourou, M.C.; Tsironi, T.N. Application of processing and packaging hurdles for fresh-cut fruits and vegetables preservation. Foods 2021, 10, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ščetar, M.; Kurek, M.; Galic, K. Trends in fruit and vegetable packaging—A review. Croat. J. Food Technol. Biotechnol. Nutr. 2010, 5, 69–86. Available online: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/95967 (accessed on 29 August 2024).
- Palou, L.; Valencia-Chamorro, S.A.; Pérez-Gago, M.B. Antifungal edible coatings for fresh citrus fruit: A review. Coatings 2015, 5, 962–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nechita, P.; Iana-Roman, M.R. Review on polysaccharides used in coatings for food packaging papers. Coatings 2020, 10, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourtoom, T.; Chinnan, M.S. Improvement of water barrier property of rice starch-chitosan composite film incorporated with lipids. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2009, 15, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousuf, B.; Sun, Y.; Wu, S. Lipid and Lipid-containing Composite Edible Coatings and Films. Food Rev. Int. 2022, 38, 574–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liguori, G.; Gaglio, R.; Greco, G.; Gentile, C.; Settanni, L.; Inglese, P. Effect of opuntia ficus-indica mucilage edible coating on quality, nutraceutical, and sensorial parameters of minimally processed cactus pear fruits. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Medeiros, V.P.B.; de Oliveira, K.Á.R.; Queiroga, T.S.; de Souza, E.L. Development and Application of Mucilage and Bioactive Compounds from Cactaceae to Formulate Novel and Sustainable Edible Films and Coatings to Preserve Fruits and Vegetables—A Review. Foods 2024, 13, 3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shinga, M.H.; Fawole, O.A. Opuntia ficus indica mucilage coatings regulate cell wall softening enzymes and delay the ripening of banana fruit stored at retail conditions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 245, 125550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukwevho, P.L.; Kaseke, T.; Fawole, O.A. Ascorbic acid-enriched cactus mucilage coatings maintained quality attributes of roasted ‘Wichita’ pecan nuts under accelerated storage conditions. J. Agric. Food Res. 2024, 18, 101301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Candir, E.; Ozdemir, A.E.; Aksoy, M.C. Effects of chitosan coating and modified atmosphere packaging on postharvest quality and bioactive compounds of pomegranate fruit cv. ‘Hicaznar’. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 235, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varasteh, F.; Arzani, K.; Barzegar, M.; Zamani, Z. Changes in anthocyanins in arils of chitosan-coated pomegranate (Punica granatum L. cv. Rabbab-e-Neyriz) fruit during cold storage. Food Chem. 2012, 130, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawhena, T.G.; Opara, U.L.; Fawole, O.A. Optimization of gum arabic and starch-based edible coatings with lemongrass oil using response surface methodology for improving postharvest quality of whole ‘wonderful’ pomegranate fruit. Coatings 2021, 11, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N.; Pratibha; Neeraj; Petkoska, A.T.; AL-Hilifi, S.A.; Fawole, O.A. Effect of Chitosan–Pullulan Composite Edible Coating Functionalized with Pomegranate Peel Extract on the Shelf Life of Mango (Mangifera indica). Coatings 2021, 11, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maqbool, M.; Ali, A.; Alderson, P.G.; Zahid, N.; Siddiqui, Y. Effect of a novel edible composite coating based on gum arabic and chitosan on biochemical and physiological responses of banana fruits during cold storage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 5474–5482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thakur, R.; Pristijono, P.; Bowyer, M.; Singh, S.P.; Scarlett, C.J.; Stathopoulos, C.E.; Vuong, Q.V. A starch edible surface coating delays banana fruit ripening. LWT 2019, 100, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nair, M.S.; Saxena, A.; Kaur, C. Effect of chitosan and alginate-based coatings enriched with pomegranate peel extract to extend the postharvest quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.). Food Chem. 2018, 240, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Gioushy, S.F.; Abdelkader, M.F.M.; Mahmoud, M.H.; Abou El Ghit, H.M.; Fikry, M.; Bahloul, A.M.E.; Morsy, A.R.; A., L.A.; Abdelaziz, A.M.R.A.; Alhaithloul, H.A.S.; et al. The Effects of a Gum Arabic-Based Edible Coating on Guava Fruit Characteristics during Storage. Coatings 2022, 12, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Baswal, A.K.; Ramezanian, A.; Gill, K.S.; Mirza, A.A. Impact of carboxymethyl cellulose-based edible coating on storage life and quality of guava fruit cv. ‘Allahabad Safeda’ under ambient storage conditions. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 4805–4812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nxumalo, K.A.; Fawole, O.A.; Oluwafemi, O.S. Evaluating the Efficacy of Gum Arabic-Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Composite Coating on Shelf-Life Extension of Mandarins (cv. Kinnow). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 953861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; Kan, C.; Chen, M.; Chen, C.; Chen, Y.; Fu, Y.; Wan, C.; Chen, J. Effects of Chitosan-Based Coatings Enriched with Cinnamaldehyde on Mandarin Fruit cv. Ponkan during Room-Temperature Storage. Coatings 2018, 8, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, S.; Anjum, M.A.; Ejaz, S.; Hussain, S.; Ercisli, S.; Saleem, M.S.; Sardar, H. Carboxymethyl cellulose coating delays chilling injury development and maintains eating quality of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin fruits during low temperature storage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 168, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, C.; Peng, X.; Zeng, R.; Chen, M.; Wan, C.; Chen, J. Ficus hirta fruits extract incorporated into an alginate-based edible coating for Nanfeng mandarin preservation. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 202, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domínguez, R.; Barba, F.; Gómez, B.; Putnik, P.; Kovačević, D.B.; Pateiro, M.; Santos, E.M. Active Packaging Films with Natural Antioxidants to Be Used in Meat Industry: A Review. Food Res. Int. 2018, 113, 93–101. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963996918305283 (accessed on 29 August 2024).
- Pellissery, A.J.; Vinayamohan, P.G.; Amalaradjou, M.A.R.; Venkitanarayanan, K. Spoilage bacteria and meat quality. In Meat Quality Analysis: Advanced Evaluation Methods, Techniques, and Technologies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 307–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arokiyaraj, S.; Dinakarkumar, Y.; Shin, H. A comprehensive overview on the preservation techniques and packaging of processed meat products: Emphasis on natural derivatives. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2024, 36, 103032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russo, G.L.; Langellotti, A.L.; Torrieri, E.; Masi, P. Emerging technologies in seafood processing: An overview of innovations reshaping the aquatic food industry. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2024, 23, e13281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gokoglu, N. Novel natural food preservatives and applications in seafood preservation: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 2068–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekhit, A.E.D.A.; Holman, B.W.B.; Giteru, S.G.; Hopkins, D.L. Total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) and its role in meat spoilage: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 109, 280–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gokoglu, N.; Yerlikaya, P. Seafood Chilling, Refrigeration and Freezing: Science and Technology. 2015. Available online: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=12JvCAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA186&ots=eygiGgcHO3&sig=Tr9U5SLojRrtXqpqB1Y6CfBOTvA (accessed on 29 August 2024).
- Ghaly, A.E.; Dave, D.; Ghaly, A.E. Meat Spoilage Mechanisms and Preservation Techniques: A Critical Review. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2011, 6, 486–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Ortega, I.; García-Almendárez, B.E.; Santos-López, E.M.; Amaro-Reyes, A.; Barboza-Corona, J.E.; Regalado, C. Antimicrobial edible films and coatings for meat and meat products preservation. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 248935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuwahara, K.; Osako, K. Effect of Sodium Gluconate on Gel Formation of Japanese Common Squid Mantle Muscle. 2003. Available online: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20033153745 (accessed on 30 August 2024).
- Mohan, C.O.; Ravishankar, C.N.; Lalitha, K.V.; Srinivasa Gopal, T.K. Effect of chitosan edible coating on the quality of double filleted Indian oil sardine (Sardinella longiceps) during chilled storage. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 26, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, R.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Song, R.; Li, Y. Performance of eugenol emulsion/chitosan edible coating and application in fresh meat preservation. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, 16407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruan, C.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Gao, X.; Xiong, G.; Liang, J. Effect of sodium alginate and carboxymethyl cellulose edible coating with epigallocatechin gallate on quality and shelf life of fresh pork. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 141, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azadi, A.; Rafieian, F.; Sami, M.; Rezaei, A. Investigating the effects of chitosan/ tragacanth gum/ polyvinyl alcohol composite coating incorporated with cinnamon essential oil nanoemulsion on safety and quality features of chicken breast fillets during storage in the refrigerator. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 126481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qiu, L.; Zhang, M.; Chitrakar, B.; Adhikari, B.; Yang, C. Effects of nanoemulsion-based chicken bone gelatin-chitosan coatings with cinnamon essential oil and rosemary extract on the storage quality of ready-to-eat chicken patties. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 34, 100933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H.; sung Hong, W.; Oh, S.W. Effect of layer-by-layer antimicrobial edible coating of alginate and chitosan with grapefruit seed extract for shelf-life extension of shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) stored at 4 °C. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 1468–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alparslan, Y.; Sıtkı, M.; Üniversity, K.; Hasanhocaoğlu, H.; Üniversitesi, Y.M. Combined effect of orange peel essential oil and gelatin coating on the quality and shelf life of shrimps. J. Food Saf. Food Qual. 2017, 68, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, W.; Yan, C.; Ding, Y.; Wang, W.; Gu, S.; Xu, Z.; Zhou, X.; Ding, Y. Effect of a chitosan coating incorporating epigallocatechin gallate on the quality and shelf life of bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis) fillets during chilled storage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 219, 1272–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, Z.E.; Pinho, O.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O. Food industry by-products used as functional ingredients of bakery products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 67, 106–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manley, D. Biscuit, Cracker and Cookie Recipes for the Food Industry. 2001. Available online: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=tK2jAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=7HDL5Q2c9s&sig=AmyhYuj9PpInsDjGXMt_xSCYDtM (accessed on 2 September 2024).
- Konstantas, A.; Stamford, L.; Azapagic, A. Evaluating the environmental sustainability of cakes. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2019, 19, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, M.; Liu, D.; Zhang, X.; Yin, Z.; Ismail, B.B.; Ye, X.; Guo, M. A review of active packaging in bakery products: Applications and future trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 114, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melini, V.; Melini, F. Strategies to extend bread and GF bread shelf-life: From Sourdough to antimicrobial active packaging and nanotechnology. Fermentation 2018, 4, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Axel, C.; Zannini, E.; Arendt, E.K. Mold spoilage of bread and its biopreservation: A review of current strategies for bread shelf life extension. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 3528–3542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alexieva, I.; Baeva, M.; Popova, A.; Fidan, H.; Goranova, Z.; Milkova-Tomova, I. Development and Application of Edible Coatings with Malva sylvestris L. Extract to Extend Shelf-Life of Small Loaf. Foods 2022, 11, 3831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saraiva, L.E.F.; Naponucena, L.D.O.M.; da Silva Santos, V.; Silva, R.P.D.; de Souza, C.O.; Souza, I.E.G.L.; Mamede, M.E.; Druzian, J.I. Development and application of edible film of active potato starch to extend mini panettone shelf life. LWT 2016, 73, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Pilli, T. Development of a vegetable oil and egg proteins edible film to replace preservatives and primary packaging of sweet baked goods. Food Control 2020, 114, 107273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grosso, A.L.; Asensio, C.M.; Grosso, N.R.; Nepote, V. Increase of walnuts’ shelf life using a walnut flour protein-based edible coating. LWT 2020, 118, 108712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chinma, C.E.; Ariahu, C.C.; Abu, J.O. Shelf Life Extension of Toasted Groundnuts through the Application of Cassava Starch and Soy Protein-Based Edible Coating. Niger. Food J. 2014, 32, 133–138. Available online: www.nifst.org (accessed on 20 April 2025). [CrossRef]
- Mouzakitis, C.K.; Sereti, V.; Matsakidou, A.; Kotsiou, K.; Biliaderis, C.G.; Lazaridou, A. Physicochemical properties of zein-based edible films and coatings for extending wheat bread shelf life. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 132, 107856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tunick, M.H.; Van Hekken, D.L. Dairy Products and Health: Recent Insights. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 9381–9388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, E.; Zemel, M.B. Functional properties of whey, whey components, and essential amino acids: Mechanisms underlying health benefits for active people (Review). J. Nutr. Biochem. 2003, 14, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasralla, N.N.; Gomah, N.H.; Aly, M.M.; Abdel-Aleem, J.A.; Hammam, A.R.; Osman, D.M.; El-Derwy, Y.M. Compositional characteristics of dairy products and their potential nondairy applications after shelf-life. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2022, 5, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bagheripoor, N.; Khoshgozaran-Abras, S.; Sohrabvandi, S.; Khorshidian, N.; Mortazavian, A.M.; MollaKhalili, N.; Jazaeri, S. Application of active edible coatings to improve the shelf-life of cheese. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2018, 24, 949–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salama, H.H.; Trif, M.; Rusu, A.V.; Bhattacharya, S. Application of Functional and Edible Coatings and Films as Promising Strategies for Developing Dairy Functional Products—A Review on Yoghurt Case. Coatings 2022, 12, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lisboa, H.M.; Pasquali, M.B.; dos Anjos, A.I.; Sarinho, A.M.; de Melo, E.D.; Andrade, R.; Batista, L.; Lima, J.; Diniz, Y.; Barros, A. Innovative and Sustainable Food Preservation Techniques: Enhancing Food Quality, Safety, and Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Divsalar, E.; Tajik, H.; Moradi, M.; Forough, M.; Lotfi, M.; Kuswandi, B. Characterization of cellulosic paper coated with chitosan-zinc oxide nanocomposite containing nisin and its application in packaging of UF cheese. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 109, 1311–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Youssef, A.M.; El-Sayed, S.M.; El-Sayed, H.S.; Salama, H.H.; Dufresne, A. Enhancement of Egyptian soft white cheese shelf life using a novel chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose/zinc oxide bionanocomposite film. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, K.; Dang, H.; Liu, L.; Hu, X.; Li, X.; Ma, Z.; Wang, X.; Ren, T. Effect of syringic acid incorporation on the physical, mechanical, structural and antibacterial properties of chitosan film for quail eggs preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 141, 876–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alshehri, A.A.; Hamed, Y.S.; Kamel, R.M.; Shawir, S.M.; Sakr, H.; Ali, M.; Ammar, A.; Saleh, M.N.; El Fadly, E.; Salama, M.A.; et al. Enhanced physical properties, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of bio-composite films composed from carboxymethyl cellulose and polyvinyl alcohol incorporated with broccoli sprout seed extract for butter packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 255, 128346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, R.; Song, G.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Chi, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, H.; Bai, S.; Zhang, X. Effect of basil essential oil and beeswax incorporation on the physical, structural, and antibacterial properties of chitosan emulsion-based coating for eggs preservation. LWT 2021, 150, 112020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahajan, K.; Kumar, S.; Bhat, Z.F.; Naqvi, Z.; Mungure, T.E.; Bekhit, A.E.D.A. Functionalization of carrageenan-based edible film using Aloe vera for improved lipid oxidative and microbial stability of frozen dairy products. Food Biosci. 2021, 43, 101336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhir, B.; Singla, N. Consumption Pattern and Health Implications of Convenience Foods: A Practical Review. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2020, 38, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, F.; Zhang, M.; Yang, C. Application of ultrasound technology in processing of ready-to-eat fresh food: A review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020, 63, 104953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; Liu, H.; Wang, T.; Jiang, Z.; Zhu, Y. Low temperature preservation for perishable ready to eat foods: Not entirely effective for control of L. monocytogenes. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 142, 104228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ready Meals Global Market Report 2025, Size and Share by 2034. Available online: https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/ready-meals-global-market-report (accessed on 7 May 2025).
- Mwelase, S.; Kaseke, T.; Fawole, O.A. Development and optimization of methylcellulose-based edible coating using response surface methodology for improved quality management of ready-to-eat pomegranate arils. CYTA J. Food 2023, 21, 656–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.L.; Hsu, C.K.; Hsu, M.M. Improving the quality of fresh-cut pineapples with ascorbic acid/sucrose pretreatment and modified atmosphere packaging. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2007, 20, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayhan, Z. Effect of Packaging on the Quality and Shelf-life of Minimally Processed/Ready to Eat Foods. 2011. Available online: http://www.academicfoodjournal.com (accessed on 30 April 2025).
- Cofelice, M.; Iftikhar, A.; Lopez, F.; De Leonardis, A. Effect of edible coatings on quality parameters and phenol composition of ready-to-eat Salanova lettuce. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2024, 250, 691–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousuf, B.; Qadri, O.S.; Srivastava, A.K. Recent developments in shelf-life extension of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables by application of different edible coatings: A review. LWT 2018, 89, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olivas, G.; Barbosa-Cánovas, G.V.I. Edible Coatings for Fresh-Cut Fruits. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005, 45, 657–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singla, M.; Pareek, S.; Kumar, N.; Sagar, N.A.; Fawole, O.A. Chitosan-Cinnamon Oil Coating Maintains Quality and Extends Shelf Life of Ready-To-Use Pomegranate Arils under Low-Temperature Storage. J. Food Qual. 2022, 2022, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liguori, G.; Greco, G.; Gaglio, R.; Settanni, L.; Gentile, C.; Inglese, P. Mucilage-Based and Calcium Ascorbate Edible Coatings Improve Postharvest Quality and Storability of Minimally Processed Cactus Pear Fruit Stored under Passive Atmosphere. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozlu, A.; Elmacı, Y. Quince seed mucilage as edible coating for mandarin fruit; determination of the quality characteristics during storage. J. Food Process Preserv. 2020, 44, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jha, S.; Akula, B.; Enyioma, H.; Novak, M.; Amin, V.; Liang, H. Biodegradable Biobased Polymers: A Review of the State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Directions. Polymers 2024, 16, 2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anugrahwidya, R.; Armynah, B.; Tahir, D. Bioplastics Starch-Based with Additional Fiber and Nanoparticle: Characteristics and Biodegradation Performance: A Review. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 3459–3476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sangroniz, A.; Zhu, J.B.; Tang, X.; Etxeberria, A.; Chen, E.Y.X.; Sardon, H. Packaging materials with desired mechanical and barrier properties and full chemical recyclability. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosseto, M.; Rigueto, C.V.; Krein, D.D.; Balbé, N.P.; Massuda, L.A.; Dettmer, A. Biodegradable Polymers: Opportunities and Challenges. In Organic Polymers; Sand, A., Zaki, E.G., Eds.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2020; pp. 1–18. ISBN 978-1-78984-618-8. [Google Scholar]
- Nakajima, H.; Dijkstra, P.; Loos, K. The recent developments in biobased polymers toward general and engineering applications: Polymers that are upgraded from biodegradable polymers, analogous to petroleum-derived polymers, and newly developed. Polymers 2017, 9, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meraldo, A. Introduction to Bio-Based Polymers. In Multilayer Flexible Packaging, 2nd ed.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.; Habib, M.; Rao, E.S.; Kumar, Y.; Bashir, K.; Jan, S.; Jan, K. A comprehensive overview of biodegradable packaging films: Part I—Sources, additives, and preparation methods. Discov. Food 2025, 5, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, S.; Han, L.; Yu, C.; Pan, L.; Tu, K. A Review on Replacing Food Packaging Plastics with Nature-Inspired Bio-Based Materials. Foods 2025, 14, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, S.; Cintil, A.A.; Chirayil, J.; Thomas, B. Handbook of Biopolymers; Springer: Singapore, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- O’Connor, L.J.; Favreau-Farhadi, N.; Barrett, A.H. Use of edible barriers in intermediate moisture food systems to inhibit moisture migration. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42, e13512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chalk, S. Raw Material Variability 2014. MJH Life Sciences. Available online: https://www.biopharminternational.com/view/raw-material-variability (accessed on 27 May 2025).
- Toma, D.-I.; Manaila-Maximean, D.; Fierascu, I.; Baroi, A.M.; Matei, R.I.; Fistos, T.; Chican, I.E.; Fierascu, R.C. Applications of Natural Polymers in the Grapevine Industry: Plant Protection and Value-Added Utilization of Waste. Polymers 2025, 17, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luckachan, G.E.; Pillai, C.K.S. Biodegradable Polymers—A Review on Recent Trends and Emerging Perspectives. J. Polym. Environ. 2011, 19, 637–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zia, K.M.; Akram, N.; Tabasum, S.; Noreen, A.; Akbar, M.U. Processing of bio-based polymers for industrial and medical applications. In Processing Technology for Bio-Based Polymers; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 191–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jernström, E.; Karvonen, V.; Kässi, T.; Kraslawski, A.; Hallikas, J. The main factors affecting the entry of SMEs into bio-based industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 141, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fayshal, M.A. Current practices of plastic waste management, environmental impacts, and potential alternatives for reducing pollution and improving management. Heliyon 2024, 10, e40838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moshood, T.D.; Nawanir, G.; Mahmud, F.; Mohamad, F.; Ahmad, M.H.; Ghani, A.A. Expanding policy for biodegradable plastic products and market dynamics of bio-based plastics: Challenges and opportunities. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pakseresht, A.; Ahmadi Kaliji, S.; Canavari, M. Review of factors affecting consumer acceptance of cultured meat. Appetite 2022, 170, 105829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Civille, G.V. Food quality: Consumer acceptance and sensory attributes. J. Food Qual. 1991, 14, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Churton, H.; McCabe, B.K. Advancing a food loss and waste bioproduct industry: A critical review of policy approaches for application in an Australian context. Heliyon 2024, 10, e32735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akinsemolu, A.A.; Idowu, A.M.; Onyeaka, H.N. Recycling Technologies for Biopolymers: Current Challenges and Future Directions. Polymers 2024, 16, 2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, F.; Misra, M.; Mohanty, A.K. Challenges and new opportunities on barrier performance of biodegradable polymers for sustainable packaging. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2021, 117, 101395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choe, E.; Min, D.B. Mechanisms of Antioxidants in the Oxidation of Foods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2009, 8, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díaz-Montes, E.; Castro-Muñoz, R. Edible Films and Coatings as Food-Quality Preservers: An Overview. Foods 2021, 10, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Application | Incorporation | Outcomes | References |
---|---|---|---|
Mandarin fruit | Sodium alginate, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and locust bean gum. | All treatments had a substantial impact on mandarin fruit quality at room temperature and cold storage. The greatest results were obtained with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose or single chitosan coatings, especially for bioactive components and organic acid retention. The application of these edible coatings is straightforward, sustainable, and cost-effective, indicating potential for future fruit preservation research and development. | [47] |
Raw grass carp fillets | Essential oils | Chitosan coatings infused with essential oils helped to retain the quality and antioxidant enzyme activity of chilled grass carp fillets. Among the tested groups, the Ch + clove oil coating offered the best protection. The coatings decreased lipid oxidation by retaining the activity of CAT, GSH-px, and total SOD enzymes, making this technology a viable option for reducing oxidative damage and preserving the quality of chilled fish fillets. | [48] |
Strawberry | Ascorbic acid, apple peels polyphenols. | The coatings reduced decay, weight loss, and delayed changes in the color, pH, and acidity of strawberries. | [49,50,51] |
Pears | Ascorbic acid | The coating prolonged the postharvest life of pears by reducing weight loss, controlling core browning, and maintaining the quality of the fruit. | [52] |
Purple passion fruit | Medicinal plant extract | The control group’s shelf life was lowered by 8 days compared to coated fruits. The chitosan-coated passion fruit was the most efficient in decreasing shrivelling and maintaining fruit quality when compared to the control. | [53] |
Raspberries | Calcium/Vitamin E | The coatings increased the shelf life, storability, and nutritional value of fresh raspberries. | [49] |
Food Product | Starch | Outcomes | References |
---|---|---|---|
Tomato | Mango kernel starch | Sorbitol-based formulations were the most successful in preserving the overall quality of tomato fruit during storage. | [72] |
Pomegranate fruit | Starch-based coating, glycerol and oleum nigella | The coating significantly reduced weight loss, browning decay rates, and the highest overall arils quality. Edible starch-based coating, including sativa oil, appeared to be a good mixture for maintaining the quality of fruits during storage. | [73] |
Gum Arabic | The coating reduced weight loss, respiration rate and maintained the total soluble solids. This shows that the postharvest quality of the pomegranate fruit was maintained. | [74] | |
Rice cake | Corn starch | The edible film exhibited more optimized thermal and mechanical properties. The film also extended the shelf life of rice cakes by approximately 2–4 days. | [75] |
Orange | Pea starch and Guar gum | The addition of fatty components to pea starch-guar gum coatings decreased fruit respiration, ethylene generation, weight and firmness loss, peel pitting, and the fruit decay rate index. | [76] |
Food | Coating | Results | References |
---|---|---|---|
Strawberry | Carboxymethyl Cellulose | The coating successfully delayed senescence and preserved the quality of stored fruit in both ambient and cold storage. The biochemical and microbiological degradation, along with the textural or physical deterioration of kept fruits, was inhibited. | [89] |
Avocado | methyl cellulose-based | The coating reduced respiration rate, color changes in both flesh and skin and reduced the softening of the tissue. Also, it improved the shelf life of avocados by 4 days. | [90] |
Carboxymethylcellulose | The results showed that the coating reduced the rate of respiration, firmness loss, and moisture. It exhibited a low frequency of illness and reduced disease severity. This led to enhanced fruit quality and extended shelf life. | [91] | |
Golden berries | Carboxymethyl Cellulose | The microbial growth was delayed in golden berries, and the phenolic content was enhanced. | [92] |
Mango | Methylcellulose and carvacol | The coating successfully reduced weight loss, improved firmness, and maintained ascorbic acid. Additionally, the coated mangoes exhibited a low decay index, and their shelf life remained stable for 28 days. | [93] |
Strawberry | chia seed mucilage/bacterial cellulose | The total phenol content, flavonoid, antioxidant activity, and ascorbic acid of the fruit were preserved by the coating. The coating also restricted the activity of peroxidase enzymes and polyphenol oxidase. | [94] |
Chinese fried dough cake | methylcellulose | The degree of browning, hardness, and oil content diminished, whereas the dough cake’s physicochemical qualities improved throughout a seven-day storage period. After 7 days, malondialdehyde content, peroxide value, p-anisidine, and acid value were also reduced. | [95] |
Food | Coating | Incorporation | Results | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Beef slices | Sodium Alginate | Cinnamon essential oil and Nisin | The SA coating enriched with CEO-NPs and nisin significantly reduced weight loss while improving the color, odor, texture, and purge quality of the beef samples, implying that treatment with the SA coating enriched with CEO-NPs and nisin can significantly retard the deterioration of beef slices, and the complex of CEO-NPs and nisin can improve the SA coating’s antioxidant, antibacterial, and sensory properties. | [109] |
Pork and beef products | Alginate | Epigallocatechin gallate and thyme essential oil | The film significantly reduced the rate of pH value and total plate count of pork. | [110] |
Sweet potato | Sodium Alginate, gum Arabic and glycerol | Natamycin | The films reduced water loss weight, mildew absorption spot, absorption of environmental oxygen, total starch, and soluble sugar consumption. Additionally, vitamin C and glycoside reduction rates were also reduced. | [111] |
Strawberry | Alginate | Encapsulated cannabidiol nanoparticles | The color-protective effect increased with the concentration of cannabidiol. Encapsulation improved the effect. Coating with encapsulated cannabis resulted in considerable weight loss reduction and pH maintenance compared to pure cannabidiol. | [112] |
Cheese | Alginate | Citric acid, Malic acid and Lactic acid | In comparison to the sample without coating, the mass loss per day was decreased by 1.6% to 0.89% in the presence of alginate coating. The samples’ rancidification was unaffected by coating. The growth of E. coli was not inhibited. Citric acid exhibited the most efficacy in reducing E. coli cell count. | [113] |
Fresh-cut apple | Alginate | Thyme oil | The study found that EC based on alginate with the addition of thyme oil effectively controlled microbiota and respiration, reduced fresh-cut apple weight loss and softening levels, and prevented browning reactions. Thus, EC with thyme oil is thought to be a good preservation recipe for fresh-cut apples. | [114] |
Sliced cooked ham | Alginate | Cinnamon essential oil and citric acid | Essential oil-containing films did not prevent Listeria innocua from growing on ham. In contrast, citric acid films effectively reduced Listeria innocua growth on ham during storage, resulting in bacterial counts below the detection limit after 12 days. | [115] |
Food Product | Protein-Based Edible Coating/Film | Results | References |
---|---|---|---|
Spinach | Whey protein and rosemary essential oil | The coating reduced weight loss and the transmission of oxygen. It also showed strong antibacterial activities against coliforms, prevented pH lowering, and preserved the color characteristics and chlorophyll content of the leaves. | [128] |
Strawberry | Cajanus cajan seed | The coating led to lower total soluble solids, reduced citric acid consumption, and less mass loss. Additionally, the edible coating prevented unwanted dehydration and extended the shelf life of strawberries during refrigeration while preserving their sensory attributes. | [129] |
Cheddar cheese | Casein and whey protein concentrate films | Cheddar cheese wrapped in low-density polyethene showed a faster deterioration rate compared to cheese sealed with an extra layer of protein films, which shows that the coating reduced the deterioration rate. Also, the physico-chemical and microbiological properties were maintained, which indicated that adding a layer of casein and whey protein concentrate (WPC) films can effectively extend the shelf life of dairy products. | [130] |
Indian Salmon fillets | Gelatin and chitosan | The coating solutions exhibited strong antibacterial and antioxidant properties, along with improved sensory and antimicrobial qualities throughout the storage study. The coating effectively extended the shelf life and acceptability of Indian salmon fillets during storage. | [131] |
Pork meat | Distiller dried grains with soluble and tea extracts | There were no notable changes in the physical properties, but the film exhibited an enhanced free radical scavenging activity. Additionally, the films inhibited lipid oxidation in pork meat while it was stored. Thus, the study proposed that this coating can serve as an active packaging solution to enhance the quality of pork meat during storage. | [132] |
Fresh-cut pears | Whey protein, lemon, and lemongrass essential oils | The coating reduced the browning of pears and maintained firmness. | [133] |
Biopolymers | Barrier Properties | Antimicrobial | Applications | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chitosan | Forms strong, biodegradable films with gas and moisture barrier properties. | Exhibits antimicrobial activity | The food industry and the packaging industry use it as a food preservative. | [144,145,146] |
Starch | Barrier properties vary depending on the type of starch and modifications. | Lacks inherent antimicrobial properties | Thickening agent, gelling agent, and stabilizer in various food products. | [147] |
Cellulose | Good barrier properties, particularly against gases and moisture. | Does not possess inherent antimicrobial properties. | Used as a food additive, in packaging, or emulsifier. | [148] |
Alginate | Provide barrier properties, especially against oxygen and moisture. | It can be incorporated with antimicrobial agents to create active packaging. | Used as a gelling agent, thickener, and stabilizer in various food and beverage applications. | [149] |
Protein | Certain proteins can form films with barrier properties against gases and moisture. | Some proteins possess inherent antimicrobial properties. | Used as a nutritional ingredient, emulsifier, gelling agent, and to improve texture in a wide range of food products. | [116,150] |
Polymer | Source | Properties | Limitations | Practical Application | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLA/poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) | Cassava starch | Improved flexibility, oxygen barrier, and crystallinity with biaxial stretching and annealing; good water vapor and oxygen permeability. | High water permeability. Requires precise annealing control, phase immiscibility can lead to microdefects | Fresh produce packaging, bakery products. | [170] |
Non-isocyanate polyurethane (NIPU) | Sweet potato residue (SPR) starch | Exhibits attractive mechanical and thermodynamic properties. Effective in food preservation | Scalability and industrial application. | Coatings for fruits and vegetables to extend shelf life. | [171] |
Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) | ZnO NPs | Improved barrier and mechanical properties, thermal stability and antibacterial activity. | Ductility reduction and nanoparticles aggregation. | Active packaging for meat and dairy products. | [172] |
PLA | Chitosan/cyclodextrin | Antibacterial, antioxidant, improved hydrophilicity and barrier properties, active release of carvacrol, reduced biofilm formation | Short degradation period, which limits long-term use. | Short-term packaging for ready-to-eat foods, antimicrobial packaging. | [173] |
PHA (medium-chain-length) | Pseudomonas citronellolis NRRL B-2504 cultivated on the soluble fraction of apple pulp waste | Films were dense, ductile, and permeable to oxygen and carbon dioxide | Relatively low volumetric productivity compared to other PHA production processes. Incomplete utilization of available sugars, particularly fructose and sucrose, indicates suboptimal fermentation conditions | MAP packaging for respiring produce. | [174] |
PLA | Rosin gum | Mechanical Properties. Enhanced processability, thermal stability, compatible microstructure, and reduced injection molding. | Lower elongation at break | Thermoformed containers, injection-molded cutlery. | [175] |
Technique | Principle | Advantages | Limitations | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Solution casting | The polymer is dissolved in a solvent, evaporated to form films. | It is an easygoing and relatively low-cost procedure. | Restricted size and amount of the produced films, long production times, and large volumes of solvent disposal. | [237,238] |
Electrospinning | A liquid droplet is electrified to generate a jet, followed by stretching and elongation to generate fiber. | It has a high surface-to-volume ratio, very high porosity, a simple process, a wide range of available raw materials and a small fiber diameter. | Poor cellular infiltration and ingrowth, possible toxicity of chemical residues after processing, inadequate mechanical strength for load-bearing applications, and slow production rate. | [239,240,241,242] |
Spray coating | An atomized polymer solution is sprayed onto the substrate. | A wide variety of coating and substrate materials | Overspray, limited thickness control. | [243] |
Extrusion | The mixed ingredients are pushed out through a small opening (die) to form and shape the materials. | It is multifunctional, versatile, continuous, solvent-free, low-cost, with high productivity energy, and it is environmentally friendly. | Thermal degradation risk. | [244,245] |
Compression molding | Placing pallets/composite compounds in a mold cavity formed by heat/pressure. | Low cost, discarding relatively small waste and molding extra-large and complicated mechanisms. | Energy-intensive, requires complex parameter control, and faces efficiency barriers in large-scale manufacturing throughput. | [246,247,248] |
3D Printing | Three-dimensional objects are produced by joining materials layer by layer. | Speed, flexibility, sustainability, risk reduction, and accessibility. | Limited ability to produce large structures, print defects, and a low selection of compatible materials. | [249,250] |
Nanocomposites | Properties | Application | References |
---|---|---|---|
Chitosan–tripolyphosphate NPs | Mechanical and barrier properties | Improved functionality of edible films for food packaging | [262] |
Cellulose nanocrystals | Oxygen barrier | Used as polar and non-polar simulants in food packaging materials | [263] |
Graphene | Heat-resistant and barrier properties | Promising material for food packaging systems | [264] |
Cellulose nanocrystals | Mechanical and antimicrobial | Biocidal activity in the food packaging industry | [265] |
Starch nanocrystals | Mechanical | Biomaterial for food packaging systems | [266] |
Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) | Mechanical, Barrier, and Optical Properties | Active food packaging material | [267] |
Antimicrobials | Polymer | Target | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Zinc oxide nanoparticles | Banana-based film | Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus | [336] |
Sorbic acid | Polypropylene (PP)-based film | E. coli, S. aureus and A. niger | [337] |
Essential oils | Alginate-based edible coating | Total plate counts, and yeast and mold | [338] |
Clove essential oil | Chitosan | E. coli and S. aureus | [339] |
Silver nanoparticles | Chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol | E. coli | [340] |
Clove extract | Chitosan-gelatin | E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa | [341] |
Food | Crosslinked Coating | Outcome | References |
---|---|---|---|
Meat | Hydrogel coating | The physical entanglement of polymer chains and the dynamic cross-linking facilitated by tannin significantly enhanced the strength and toughness of the hydrogel coating. This resulted in a coating material having exceptional performance in protecting fresh meat. It effectively preserves the color of fresh meat while preventing moisture loss. | [355] |
Strawberries | Citric acid (Cross-linker) with Polyvinyl alcohol and carboxymethyl chitosan | The addition of citric acid to improve the cross-linking of polyvinyl alcohol and carboxymethyl cellulose increased the thermal stability and mechanical properties of the films while decreasing water vapor permeability and swelling properties, which is beneficial for food packaging. | [356] |
Cherry Tomatoes | |||
Chicken breast fillets | Citric acid (cross-linker), Polyvinyl alcohol and essential oil | The annealed active food packaging structures incorporating essential oils and citric acid demonstrated improved water resistance and thermal stability when compared to their non-crosslinked counterparts. Some part of the essential oil content was lost after annealing; however, the remaining quantity in the polyvinyl alcohol samples reduced lipid oxidation by up to 68%. Furthermore, when applied to chicken breast fillets, these samples showed higher antibacterial activity, which improved both the pH and color parameters during storage. | [357] |
Banana | Polyvinyl alcohol (cross-linker), gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and graphene oxide | The incorporation of AuNPs and graphene oxide into polyvinyl alcohol crosslinked composites increased their mechanical and physical characteristics, making them interesting candidates for food packaging applications. When applied to bananas, the shelf life qualitatively improved, which then showed its capability for food packaging applications. | [358] |
Surface Modification Method | Materials/Substrate | Mechanism | Results | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Thermal spraying | Al6061-T6 | Cold Spray Deposition | A consistent and thick coating was accomplished. | [369] |
Micro-arc oxidation | TiO2 | Commercially pure titanium (Cp-Ti) | The MAO technique enhanced the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 coatings by increasing the surface area and decreasing the bandgap, indicating potential applications in environmental remediation, self-cleaning surfaces, and antibacterial coatings. | [370] |
Sol-Gel Coating | Polycarbonate | The sol-gel process encompasses hydrolysis and condensation processes. | Excellent coating cohesion and adhesion to polycarbonate | [371] |
Cellulose paper | The chitosan sol-gel solution is applied to cellulose paper, resulting in a coating. | The coated paper demonstrated significant antibacterial efficacy, superior barrier characteristics, and better surface attributes. | [372] | |
Electrodeposition | Carbon Graphite | Electrochemical deposition of silver onto the carbon graphite surface. | The formation of a silver coating on carbon graphite improved the electrode’s catalytic capabilities for the reduction in thiamethoxam. Increased sensitivity and selectivity for identifying thiamethoxam in food and beverage samples. | [373] |
Meat/Seafood | Biopolymer | Incorporation | Results | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fresh pock | Sodium alginate and carboxymethyl cellulose edible coating. | Ginger essential oil | The coating successfully prevented spoilage and significantly increased the shelf life of the pork. | [416] |
Chicken breast fillets | Chitosan/tragacanth gum/polyvinyl alcohol | Cinnamon essential oil | The antibacterial capabilities of chitosan and essential oils successfully inhibited lactic acid bacteria, psychrotrophic, and mesophilic bacteria, slowing the pH increase caused by decreased nitrogenous compound synthesis. Furthermore, the antioxidant effects of essential oil and chitosan helped minimize harmful chemical reactions, keeping the total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances of samples within acceptable limits for an extended period. | [417] |
Chicken patties | Gelatin-chitosan | Cinnamon essential oil and rosemary extract | The nanoemulsion demonstrated greater stability, more homogeneous size distribution, smoother surface, and stronger antibacterial activity. Samples treated with nanoemulsion showed the lowest values for total viable bacterial counts, pH, total volatile basic nitrogen, and thiobarbituric acid reactive chemicals. Furthermore, the nanoemulsion coating significantly decreased moisture loss from the chicken patties during storage, prolonging their shelf life by more than 4 days. | [418] |
Shrimp | Alginate and chitosan | Grapefruit seed extract | The chitosan-alginate coating substantially reduced bacterial counts by 2 log CFU, aided by the grapefruit seed extract’s antibacterial activities. This coating also reduced off-flavors in shrimp during storage by preventing the acetic acid odor from dissolving the chitosan. Chitosan-alginate treatments increased shrimp shelf life. | [419] |
Gelatin | Orange peel essential oil | The quality of shrimp was preserved in both microbiologically and chemically. This was mainly caused by the incorporation of the orange peel essential oil. | [420] | |
Bighead carp fillets | Chitosan | Epigallocatechin gallate | The antibacterial and antioxidant properties were improved, resulting in a reduction in the degradation of chemical indicators and bacterial growth. | [421] |
Bakery and Confectionery Products | Coating/Film | Outcomes | References |
---|---|---|---|
Small Loaf | Carboxymethylcellulose, Xanthan, Pectin, and Malva sylvestris L. (mallow) flowers extract. | The study found that coatings with xanthan and pectin significantly slowed down the firming of the loaf’s crumb. The smallest changes in crust color were recorded using edible coatings containing mallow extract. The loaves with mallow extract had the lowest microbial load after storage for up to three days. These studies suggest that using polysaccharide edible coatings with mallow extract is effective for bakery product shelf-life extension. | [428] |
Mini panettone | potato starch, inverted sugar, sucrose with sorbate potassium, and citric acid | The use of potassium sorbate and citric acid, either alone or in combination, successfully prevented yeast and mold development in stored goods under accelerated circumstances, increasing the storage life of mini panettone by at least three times that of the control (without coating). | [429] |
Sponge cake | Vegetable oil and egg protein | The edible film maintained sensory attributes while improving the color and appearance of the product. It effectively reduced moisture transfer, minimizing moisture gain in the crust. This barrier preserved hygiene and quality, preventing fungal growth and excessive hardening for 85 days at room temperature without preservatives. The pastry cream’s moisture and viscosity remained stable, further improving the product’s overall quality. | [430] |
Walnuts | Walnut flour and methylcellulose | The edible coating made from walnut flour protected walnut kernels from lipid degradation while also preserving sensory qualities and preventing sensory features associated with lipid deterioration. It increased shelf life while also preventing allergy cross-contamination. Methylcellulose offers equivalent or poorer protection against most chemical markers of lipid oxidation. Both coatings have distinct benefits, with the walnut flour-based coating being especially advantageous. | [431] |
Toasted ground nut | Cassava starch and Soy protein | The application of edible coatings on roasted groundnuts increased the shelf life of toasted groundnuts by 14 days. | [432] |
Wheat bread | Corn zein, Tween 20, and gum Arabic. | The coated breads exhibited retardation in moisture migration from crumb to crust during storage. The water vapor barrier and mechanical properties of zein films were improved. Furthermore, the shelf life of wheat bread was extended by the coating. | [433] |
Dairy Products | Coating/Film | Outcomes | References |
---|---|---|---|
White cheese | Chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose/zinc oxide | The bio-nanocomposites have shown effective antibacterial action against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans. Furthermore, packaging sheets improved the shelf life of white soft cheese. | [441] |
Quail eggs | Chitosan and syringic acid | Incorporating SA into chitosan-SA films improved their physical and mechanical characteristics, decreased water vapor permeability and water content, and increased the uniformity and smoothness of the film surfaces. Furthermore, studies have shown that the coating film exhibits a certain preservation effect on quail eggs. | [442] |
Butter | carboxymethyl cellulose and polyvinyl alcohol, broccoli sprout seed extract. | The films demonstrated great thermal stability, and the addition of broccoli sprout seed extract increased their capacity to retain the acidity, TBARS, peroxide value, and overall color variations of butter during cold storage. | [443] |
Eggs | Chitosan, essential oil, and beeswax | The incorporation of beeswax and essential oil into the composite coating reduced water vapor permeability and increased the contact angle, indicating improved water resistance. The components of the coating emulsion were highly compatible, and incorporated materials enhanced the coating’s stability and water-blocking capabilities. Furthermore, the composite coating exhibited antibacterial properties against common bacteria on eggshell surfaces, effectively extending the shelf life of eggs. | [444] |
Kulfi | Aloe vera | The film considerably increased kulfi’s microbiological and lipid oxidative stability during storage. | [445] |
Ready-to-Eat Food | Coating | Outcome | References |
---|---|---|---|
Cactus Pear | Mucilage-Based and Calcium Ascorbate Edible Coatings | The coatings significantly preserved quality, nutritional value, and sensory profiles, extending the postharvest life of fresh-cut cactus pear fruits during cold storage. The mucilage-based coating was particularly effective, reducing respiration rates and weight loss. Coated fruits retained higher levels of total soluble solids, carbohydrates, betalains, ascorbic acid, and phenolics, highlighting the coating’s positive impact on the fruit’s nutritional and nutraceutical value. | [457] |
Opuntia ficus-indica mucilage edible coating | Mucilage coating effectively preserved the quality, nutritional value, and sensory attributes of minimally processed cactus pear fruits, extending their postharvest life. | [387] | |
Mandarin | Quince seed mucilage | The coating effectively preserved the quality and extended the shelf life of minimally processed mandarins while maintaining phenolic content and antioxidant activity. | [458] |
Pomegranate arils | Chitosan-cinnamon oil coating | The treatment effectively improved the shelf life and quality of pomegranate arils. Coatings maintained sensory acceptability, physiological stability, and antioxidant activity, making them a promising method for extending the arils’ shelf life. | [456] |
Chitosan-based melatonin composite coating | The coating significantly improved its functional properties, effectively preventing surface browning and preserving the color of pomegranate arils during cold storage. It also enhanced antioxidant capacity and maintained quality by boosting ascorbic acid and anthocyanin content. | [32] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mbonambi, N.P.; Adeyemi, J.O.; Seke, F.; Fawole, O.A. Fabrication and Application of Bio-Based Natural Polymer Coating/Film for Food Preservation: A Review. Processes 2025, 13, 2436. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082436
Mbonambi NP, Adeyemi JO, Seke F, Fawole OA. Fabrication and Application of Bio-Based Natural Polymer Coating/Film for Food Preservation: A Review. Processes. 2025; 13(8):2436. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082436
Chicago/Turabian StyleMbonambi, Nosipho P., Jerry O. Adeyemi, Faith Seke, and Olaniyi A. Fawole. 2025. "Fabrication and Application of Bio-Based Natural Polymer Coating/Film for Food Preservation: A Review" Processes 13, no. 8: 2436. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082436
APA StyleMbonambi, N. P., Adeyemi, J. O., Seke, F., & Fawole, O. A. (2025). Fabrication and Application of Bio-Based Natural Polymer Coating/Film for Food Preservation: A Review. Processes, 13(8), 2436. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082436