Review Reports
by
- Ning Qu1,2,*,†,
- Kenta Nagahori2,† and
- Miyuki Kuramasu2
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The revised version by authors is satisfied by the reviewer.
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors have adequately addressed my previous concerns. Now I just have two minor comments:
1) Lines 168 and 169: “cells” should be changed to “cell markers” or “markers”.
2) Line 170: “of” before “Spo11” seems to be not necessary.