Next Article in Journal
Ten-Second Cold Water Stress Test Differentiates Parkinson’s Disease from Multiple System Atrophy: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Implication of p16 Promoter Methylation, the BRAFV600E Mutation, and ETS1 Expression Determination on Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Prognosis and High-Risk Patients’ Selection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Wildtype Glioma Adapts Toward Mutant Phenotypes and Enhanced Therapy Sensitivity Under D-2-Hydroxyglutarate Exposure

by
Geraldine Rocha
1,2,
Clara Francés-Gómez
1,2,
Javier Megías
1,2,
Lisandra Muñoz-Hidalgo
1,2,
Pilar Casanova
1,2,
Jose F. Haro-Estevez
1,2,
Vicent Teruel-Martí
3,
Daniel Monleón
1,2,* and
Teresa San-Miguel
1,2
1
Department of Pathology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
2
INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, 46010 Valencia, Spain
3
Department of Anatomy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2025, 13(7), 1584; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071584
Submission received: 29 May 2025 / Revised: 20 June 2025 / Accepted: 24 June 2025 / Published: 28 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms and Therapy of Gliomas)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are hallmark features in subsets of gliomas, producing the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG). Although IDH mutations are associated with better clinical outcomes, their relationship with tumor progression is complex. This study aimed to investigate, in vitro and in vivo, the phenotypic consequences of IDH mutation and 2HG exposure in glioblastoma (GBM) under normoxic and hypoxic conditions and under temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation exposure. Methods: Experiments were conducted using IDH-wildtype (IDH-wt) and IDH-mutant (IDH-mut) glioma cell lines under controlled oxygen conditions. Functional assays included cell viability, cell cycle analysis, apoptosis profiling, migration, and surface marker expression via flow cytometry. Orthotopic xenografts were established in immunocompromised mice to assess in vivo tumor growth and morphology, followed by MRI and histological analysis. Treatments included TMZ, radiation, and 2HG at varying concentrations. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and RStudio. Results: IDH-wt cells exhibited faster proliferation and greater adaptability under hypoxia, while IDH-mut cells showed cell cycle arrest and limited growth. 2HG recapitulated IDH-mut features in IDH-wt cells, including increased apoptosis under TMZ, reduced proliferation, and altered CD24/CD44 expression. In vivo, IDH-wt tumors were larger and more infiltrative, while 2HG administration reduced tumor volume and promoted compact morphology. Notably, migration was initially similar across genotypes but increased in IDH-mut and 2HG-treated IDH-wt cells over time, though suppressed under therapeutic stress. Conclusions: IDH mutation and 2HG modulate glioma cell biology, including cell cycle dynamics, proliferation rates, migration, and apoptosis. While the IDH mutation and its metabolic product confer initial growth advantages, they enhance treatment sensitivity and reduce invasiveness, highlighting potential vulnerabilities for targeted therapy.

1. Introduction

Gliomas have historically been recognized as a heterogeneous group of primary central nervous system tumors with diverse biological behaviors and clinical outcomes. The integration of molecular biomarkers into their classification has transformed the field, particularly through the distinction between grade 4 adult-type diffuse gliomas: IDH-wildtype (IDH-wt) glioblastoma and IDH-mutant (IDH-mut) astrocytoma [1]. This molecular redefinition has improved prognostic accuracy [2,3], but its translation into tangible changes in therapeutic decision-making in neuro-oncology is still evolving [4,5,6].
IDH-wt glioblastomas are now diagnosed based on distinct molecular features, including TERT promoter mutations, EGFR amplification, or the combination of chromosome 7 gain with chromosome 10 loss. In contrast, grade 4 IDH-mut astrocytomas are classified using updated grading systems emphasizing alterations such IDH1/2 mutations and ATRX loss [2,7]. Histologically, IDH-wt glioblastomas are associated with necrosis, microvascular proliferation, and aggressive growth patterns [8,9], whereas IDH-mut astrocytomas tend to display a more organized architecture and lower proliferation indices [8]. These differences have clear prognostic implications. IDH-mut astrocytomas are linked to longer survival compared to the poorer outcomes observed in IDH-wt glioblastoma [10]. This classification has provided clarity in a previously overlapping spectrum of high-grade gliomas and opened the door to biologically informed treatment strategies.
The identification of IDH mutations marked a critical inflection point in glioma research. These mutations were found in 73% of secondary glioblastomas but only in 3.7% of primary cases, revealing fundamental biological differences between subtypes [11]. Since then, IDH mutation status has become a stronger prognostic indicator than traditional histology [3,12]. Functionally, IDH mutations lead to the production of the so-called oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG), which disrupts DNA and histone demethylation, contributing to epigenetic dysregulation and tumorigenesis [13,14]. Tumors harboring these mutations display the glioma-CIMP phenotype, characterized by widespread DNA hypermethylation [15,16].
Although progress has been made, the precise role of 2HG in glioma biology remains unclear. While 2HG accumulation is linked to oncogenic processes resulting from IDH mutations found in astrocytomas and other cancers [17,18], in glioblastomas, this absence correlates with increased aggressiveness and therapy resistance [19], although the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. To explore this, we conducted in vitro experiments to determine whether exogenous 2HG could induce IDH-mut-like traits in IDH-wt glioma cells. We assessed changes in cellular behavior with and without 2HG, both under baseline conditions and during temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation treatment. Furthermore, we extended our investigation to an in vivo model, assessing tumor growth in mice after 2HG treatment to explore the potential sensitization of IDH-wt tumors. This study aims to clarify whether 2HG can modulate tumor cell phenotype and provide mechanistic insight into its functional role in glioma progression.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture, Treatment Conditions, and Cell Growth Curve

In this study, U87MG (IDH-wt) and U87-IDHmut (IDH-mut) cell lines (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were used and cultured under different experimental conditions, including normoxia (21% O2) and hypoxia (1% O2, 5% CO2, 94% N2), in a controlled chamber (BioSpherix, Parish, NY, USA). Experimental groups included untreated controls and treatments with TMZ at 25 μM (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA), irradiation 2 Gy (X-Rad225XL; Precision X-Ray, North Branford, CT, USA), and 2HG at two different doses, 0.1 mM and 1 mM (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Cells were cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and monitored daily using a phase-contrast microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). For cell growth curve analysis, cells were seeded at a density of 100,000 cells per well in 6-well plates and maintained under normoxic or hypoxic conditions (1.5% O2) for ten days. Daily, cells were stained with Trypan Blue and counted using an automated cell counter (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.2. Functional Characterization by Flow Cytometry

For cell death profiling, approximately 5 × 105 cells were collected, centrifuged at 500× g for 5 min at 4 °C, and then resuspended in 200 μL PBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Cells were stained with Apopxin Green (1.55 μL; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for apoptotic detection, 7-AAD (0.81 μL; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for necrotic identification, and CytoCalcein Violet 450 (0.92 μL; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for viable cell assessment. Following a 15–30 min incubation at room temperature in light-protected conditions, samples were diluted in 300 μL assay buffer.
For cell cycle analysis, cells were fixed in cold 70% ethanol, washed, and then resuspended in 500 μL of a propidium iodide (PI) solution containing 0.1% RNase (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). After overnight incubation at 2–8 °C in light-protected conditions, samples were processed to assess DNA content and cell cycle distribution, including G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases.
Proliferation tracking was performed via Carboxyfluorescein Succinimidyl Ester (CFSE) labeling. Cells were incubated with CFSE (1 μL of 5 mM; BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) for 20 min at room temperature in the dark, followed by quenching with complete culture medium (RPMI + 10% FBS), centrifugation, and resuspension in fresh medium. A subset of labeled cells was immediately analyzed to establish baseline fluorescence.
For phenotypic characterization, cells were stained with CD24, CD44, and CD45 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) antibodies at optimized concentrations. Single-stained and Fluorescence Minus One (FMO) controls were included. Following a 15 min incubation at 4 °C in the dark, cells were washed, fixed, and resuspended in fixation buffer. For CD44+ cells, two gates were created to distinguish between CD44_High and CD44_Low subpopulations based on their relative expression levels. All experiments were performed on a BD LSRFortessa™ X-20 cytometer, and data were analyzed using FlowJo™ v10.8 Software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) [20].

2.3. Migration Assays

The migration assay was performed following seven days of treatment with the same doses of TMZ, irradiation, and 0.1 mM 2HG using culture inserts (Ibidi, Gräfelfing, Germany). A cell suspension (4 × 105 cells/mL) was prepared in RPMI medium supplemented with 1% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After centrifuging to remove debris, 110 µL of this suspension was seeded per well. Cells were allowed to reach confluence over six days before inserts were removed to create a migration gap. Images were captured at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h, as well as on day 6, using the LAS X Leica Application Suite X, version 3.7 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Image analysis was performed using Fiji, version 2.0.0-rc-69/1.52p (open-source, based on National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) [21], which was also used for morphological analyses, including the extraction of surface area, volume, Feret diameter, circularity, and roundness.

2.4. In Vivo Evaluation of Tumor Growth in an Orthotopic Xenograft Mouse Model

2.4.1. Experimental Design

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Welfare of the University of Valencia (code: 2022VSCPEA0172; 22 August 2022). All procedures complied with institutional and national regulations, followed the 3Rs [22], and adhered to ARRIVE guidelines [23]. A randomized, longitudinal, controlled, and blinded in vivo study was conducted to assess the effect of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) on tumor growth in orthotopic xenografts using IDH-wt and IDH-mut glioma cells. Three groups were established: IDH-wt + 0.9% NaCl, IDH-wt + 2HG, and IDH-mut + 0.9% NaCl. The experimental unit was one cage with four mice. Four animals per group were used, totaling twelve. Sample size was calculated a priori using G*Power, version 3.1.9.7 (Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany), based on an in vitro effect size of 2.39.
Male J:NU ATHYM-Foxn1^nu/nu mice (Janvier Labs, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France), aged 6 weeks and weighing 15–20 g, were used. These immunodeficient mice were chosen for their lack of T cells, enabling tumor growth without immune interference. Animals were housed for five weeks at UCIM (University of Valencia) under controlled conditions (12 h light/dark cycle, 22 ± 2 °C), with ad libitum access to food and water, and environmental enrichment. Inclusion criteria included the following: male sex, 6 weeks of age, weight between 15 and 30 g, normal hematology, and no abnormalities on CT. Two animals from the IDH-mut group were excluded from MR analysis due to a lack of tumor growth, yielding two animals in this group and four in the others. No exclusions were made due to pain or distress, according to the Mouse Grimace Scale [24]. Animals were randomly assigned to groups using Microsoft Excel, Microsoft 365 version (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Each group was housed in a separate cage with fixed positioning and individual identification to minimize bias. Blinding was applied to veterinary staff, imaging personnel, and data analysts, while the treatment administrator remained unblinded.

2.4.2. Stereotactic Surgery for Orthotopic Xenotransplantation and Treatment

Stereotactic implantation of cells into the hippocampus was performed as described previously [25], simulating a microenvironment that resembles the human brain vasculature and structure. Before surgery, mice were acclimated for one week, weighed for monitoring, and screened via hematology and CT. All instruments were sterilized. Anesthesia was induced with 5% isoflurane and maintained at 1.5–2%, with oxygen at 0.5–0.8 L/min. Ophthalmic ointment was applied, and local anesthesia with 5% lidocaine was administered at the incision site. Perioperative analgesia included intraperitoneal injections of buprenorphine (0.01 mL/g), enrofloxacin (0.015 mL/g), and meloxicam (0.005 mL/g). Mice were placed in a stereotactic frame (Stoelting Co., Wood Dale, IL, USA), and a 1 cm incision was made to expose the skull. Coordinates for hippocampal injection (AP 2.0; ML 1.5 R) were determined from Bregma. A Hamilton syringe (Hamilton Company, Bonaduz, Switzerland) delivered 4 µL of tumor cell suspension (78,000 cells/µL) at 0.5 µL/min. After a 2 min pause, the needle was withdrawn slowly. Bone wax was applied, and the incision sutured. Postoperative recovery was individually monitored, with daily wound care and analgesics administered as needed. Body weight was tracked throughout. Treatment consisted of 0.1 mL of 2HG (27 mM) or 0.9% NaCl, administered intraperitoneally twice weekly, based on previous in vitro experiments. Corrective measures were in place for injection issues, and a clinical scoring system guided humane endpoints.

2.4.3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was performed to monitor intratumoral alterations non-invasively. Imaging was carried out using a 3.0T MRS*DRYMAG 3017 scanner (MR-Solutions, Guildford, UK) following standardized acquisition protocols. Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane (3–4% for induction and 1–2.5% for maintenance), and physiological parameters, including body temperature and respiratory rate, were continuously monitored throughout the procedure. MRI sequences included T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLASH 3D, enabling the evaluation of tumor volume using 3D Slicer, version 5.2.2 (Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA). For contrast enhancement, Gadovist at 0.6 mmol/kg (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) was administered intraperitoneally prior to image acquisition.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and RStudio, version 2023.12.0+402 (Posit Software, Boston, MA, USA). For quantitative data derived from cytometry assays (including proliferation, surface marker expression, and cell cycle analysis), cell migration assays, and in vivo tumor volume measurements, data normality was evaluated using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, and homogeneity of variances was assessed with Levene’s test. When assumptions were met, unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests were applied to compare two experimental groups, and one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests was used for comparisons involving more than two groups. When variance heterogeneity was detected, the Games–Howell test was employed. A significance threshold of α = 0.05 was adopted throughout. Data from growth curves and migration assays were analyzed using absolute values, while cytometric variables such as marker intensities and proliferation indices were normalized as required for comparability. Multivariate analyses, including Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and heatmaps, were conducted in R, version 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) following z-score standardization to ensure equal variable contribution. Visualizations were generated using ggplot2 and Complex Heatmap [26,27], and statistical significance in PCA groupings was inferred through cluster tendencies. Results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Differential Cellular Behavior and Adaptive Responses Associated with IDH Mutation Status

3.1.1. Differences in Proliferation and Sensitivity to Hypoxia Based on IDH Mutation Status

IDH-wt cells exhibited a higher proliferative capacity than IDH-mut cells under normoxic conditions. After nine days in culture, the number of IDH-wt cells was significantly higher than that of IDH-mut cells (3.81 × 106 vs. 2.53 × 106; p = 0.02), evidence that the IDH-wt cells promote faster growth under normal oxygen conditions, as shown in Figure 1A.
However, hypoxia had a differential impact on the proliferation of both cell lines. Between days 3 and 6, the growth rate of IDH-mut cells was significantly higher than that of IDH-wt cells. By day 6, the number of IDH-wt cells reached only 9.73 × 105 (p < 0.001), demonstrating greater sensitivity to oxygen depletion. In contrast, IDH-mut cells exhibited a greater adaptive capacity, with increased growth under hypoxia (1.32 × 106 cells), indicating that the IDH mutation confers a proliferative advantage in conditions of low oxygen availability.

3.1.2. Cell Cycle Modulation by IDH Mutation and the Hypoxic Microenvironment

Cell cycle analysis revealed fundamental differences between IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells (Figure 1B). Under normoxia, the IDH mutation promoted preferential arrest in the G0/G1 phase (p < 0.001), indicating a more restrictive control of the cell cycle. Conversely, IDH-wt cells exhibited higher proliferative activity, with a significant increase in the S and G2/M phases (p < 0.001), supporting their higher growth rate under these conditions.
Hypoxia altered the cell cycle distribution in both cell lines, doubling the proportion of cells in the G2/M phase compared to normoxia. In IDH-wt cells, the percentage of cells in G2/M increased from 10.77% to 24.06%, while in IDH-mut cells, it rose from 9.8% to 24.71%, with no statistically significant differences between IDH-mut and IDH-wt.
Additionally, hypoxia modulated the cell cycle in a mutation-specific manner. In IDH-mut cells, the proportion of cells in G0/G1 decreased substantially (from 81.5% under normoxia to 67.9% under hypoxia). Meanwhile, in IDH-wt cells, hypoxia reduced the proportion of cells in the S phase from 12.5% to 4.25%, with a greater impact than in IDH-mut cells (p < 0.001), showing a reduced replication capacity in this context.

3.1.3. Differential Susceptibility to Cell Death Based on IDH Mutation Status Under Normoxia and Hypoxia

IDH-mut cells exhibited a higher susceptibility to cell death compared to IDH-wt cells under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Under normoxia, the proportion of cell death in IDH-mut cells was significantly higher (13.57 ± 0.4%) than in IDH-wt cells (7.26 ± 5.58%; p = 0.032). This trend persisted under hypoxia, where IDH-mut cells continued to show a higher cell death rate (12.22 ± 1.5% vs. 9.84 ± 1.44%; p = 0.031). Furthermore, hypoxia induced a general increase in cell death in both lines compared to normoxia, indicating that oxygen reduction acts as a stress factor affecting cell viability, with a more pronounced impact on IDH-mut cells (Figure 1C).

3.1.4. IDH-Mutant Cells Exhibit Increased Migration over Time Under Normoxic Conditions

Under normoxia, the migration of both cell lines was comparable during the first 48 h. However, by day 6, IDH-mut cells exhibited significantly greater migration than IDH-wt cells (p = 0.05). At 12 h, the migrated area in IDH-mut cells was 6.28 ± 1.61%, while IDH-wt cells reached 5.82 ± 1.04% (p = 0.32). At 24 h, migration increased to 10.53 ± 5.55% in IDH-mut cells and 11.89 ± 3.68% in IDH-wt cells, with no significant differences. By 48 h, both groups displayed a further increase in migrated area, reaching 14.23 ± 2.97% in IDH-mut and 14.90 ± 2.77% in IDH-wt cells (p = 0.38). However, by day 6, IDH-mut cells demonstrated significantly greater migration (44.66 ± 9.20%) compared to IDH-wt cells (34.53 ± 5.42%, p = 0.05). These findings indicate that IDH-mut cells display higher long-term migratory capacity under basal conditions (Figure 1D).

3.1.5. Differential Expression of Cellular Plasticity Markers Based on IDH Mutation Status

Our analysis revealed that IDH-mut cells displayed distinct subpopulation distributions based on CD24 and CD44 expression (Figure 1E,F). Specifically, we observed a higher proportion of CD24+/CD44 and CD44+/CD24 cell populations within the IDH-mut group compared to IDH-wt cells. Under normoxia, the proportion of cells with these phenotypes was significantly higher in IDH-mut cells (1.27% and 24.07%, respectively) compared to IDH-wt cells (0.17% and 17.2%, respectively; p < 0.001; p = 0.106). Additionally, IDH-wt cells generally exhibited a higher proportion of CD44+ cells than IDH-mut cells (99.23% vs. 98.5%; p = 0.001). Under hypoxia, the proportion of CD24+/CD44 and CD44+/CD24 cells in IDH-mut decreased (0.27% and 22.93%, respectively), while in IDH-wt cells, the values remained similar to those observed under normoxia (0.167 ± 0.047%; p = 0.150) (Figure 1G). Thus, hypoxia induces differential phenotypic changes that depend on the IDH mutational status.

3.2. Differential Cellular Responses to Radiotherapy and Temozolomide in IDH-Mutant and IDH-Wildtype Cells

3.2.1. Modulation of Cell Cycle Progression and Apoptotic Response Under Treatments

Treatment with TMZ and radiation altered cell cycle profiles in both IDH-mut and IDH-wt cell lines. Under normoxic conditions, radiation induced an accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase, which was significantly higher in IDH-mut cells (p = 0.002). This effect was enhanced when combined with TMZ, resulting in a further increase in G2/M-phase cells in the IDH-mut group (p < 0.001) (Figure 2A). Under hypoxia, the accumulation in the G2/M phase was more pronounced in both lines, with a marked increase in IDH-mut cells.
Although both lines showed changes in cell cycle distribution, apoptosis levels differed significantly. Under normoxia, radiation reduced cell viability in both cell types, but early apoptotic rates were higher in IDH-wt cells (43.53%) compared to IDH-mut cells (25.9%, p < 0.001). Total cell death was also significantly elevated in IDH-wt cells (48.66%) versus IDH-mut cells (28.71%, p < 0.001) (Figure 2B).
Combined TMZ and radiation treatment under hypoxia resulted in 30.4% total apoptosis in IDH-mut cells, significantly lower than in IDH-wt cells (51.12%, p < 0.001). Under these conditions, IDH-mut cells also maintained higher proliferative activity.

3.2.2. Increased Migration and Proliferation in IDH-Mutant Cells and Their Sensitivity to Treatment

IDH-mut cells exhibited enhanced proliferative and migratory capacities compared to IDH-wt cells under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. IDH-mut cells displayed significantly higher proliferation rates (p < 0.001), and although both lines exhibited similar migration at early time points, IDH-mut cells demonstrated significantly greater migration by day 6 (p = 0.05) (Figure 2C,D).
Interestingly, treatment with TMZ unexpectedly enhanced the migratory capacity of both cell lines, with IDH-mut cells displaying significantly higher migration at later time points compared to IDH-wt cells (p = 0.03). In contrast, radiation therapy alone markedly suppressed migration in both cell types, with a more substantial inhibitory effect observed in IDH-mut cells (p < 0.001). Notably, the combined treatment with TMZ and radiation further reduced migration, particularly in IDH-mut cells at early time points, resulting in a significantly greater decrease in motility relative to IDH-wt cells (p < 0.001).
Similarly, proliferation patterns mirrored these findings. Under normoxia, radiation significantly decreased proliferation in both cell lines, with a greater impact on IDH-mut cells (p < 0.001). The combination of TMZ and radiation further reduced proliferation, reinforcing the idea that IDH-mut cells are more vulnerable to DNA-damaging therapies. Under hypoxia, IDH-mut cells maintained high proliferation rates similar to those observed under normoxia, while IDH-wt cells exhibited a moderate reduction. The resistance of IDH-wt cells to TMZ was evident in both normoxia and hypoxia, as this treatment did not induce significant changes in their proliferation. In contrast, in IDH-mut cells, the combination of TMZ and radiation resulted in a marked reduction in proliferation (p < 0.001), with the IDH-mut cells being particularly susceptible to therapeutic interventions under hypoxic conditions.
These results show that IDH-mut cells display higher proliferative and migratory activity in baseline conditions, but their motility and growth are more strongly inhibited by radiation and combined therapy.

3.2.3. Differential Expression of CD44 and CD24 in Response to Treatment

Treatment-modulated expression of the surface markers CD44 and CD24 revealed distinct patterns between IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells. Under normoxic conditions, TMZ significantly decreased the proportion of CD44+ cells in IDH-wt cultures (p = 0.008), while no significant change was observed in IDH-mut cells (Figure 2E). Additionally, IDH-mut cells exhibited a higher percentage of CD24+/CD44 cells compared to IDH-wt (p = 0.003). Under hypoxia, CD44+ expression increased significantly in IDH-wt cells after combined TMZ and radiation treatment (p = 0.016). In contrast, radiation alone reduced CD44+ cell proportions in both lines, with a stronger effect in IDH-mut cells (p < 0.001).
CD24 expression was significantly decreased following radiation in both IDH-mut and IDH-wt cells, regardless of oxygen availability. However, a higher proportion of CD24+ cells persisted in IDH-mut populations (p = 0.001). The combination of TMZ and radiation further reduced the CD44+/CD24+ subpopulation, with a more pronounced reduction in IDH-mut cells (p < 0.001). An increase in CD44+/CD24 cells was also observed following radiation in both cell lines, and this effect was significantly more prominent in IDH-mut cells under hypoxia (25.88%) compared to IDH-wt (10.23%, p = 0.029).
These findings indicate that IDH-mut cells retain a higher CD24+ fraction and exhibit a greater shift toward a CD44+/CD24 phenotype after treatment, particularly under hypoxic conditions.

3.3. Impact of D-2-Hydroxyglutarate on IDH-wt Cells

3.3.1. Redefinition of the Cell Cycle: Increased G0/G1 Phase and Transition Toward the IDH-Mutant Phenotype

Treatment with 2HG in IDH-wt cells subjected to radiotherapy and TMZ induced significant alterations in cell cycle distribution, shifting the behavior toward that observed in IDH-mut cells. Under normoxic conditions, the addition of 2HG to irradiated cells resulted in an increased fraction of cells in the G0/G1 phase, reaching 33.50 ± 0.57% (p = 0.007) at 0.1 mM and 32.87 ± 1.44% (p = 0.012) in the presence of TMZ—values that exceeded those of the control (Figure 2A).
Under hypoxic conditions, exposure to 2HG further elevated the proportion of cells in G0/G1, registering 43.63 ± 2.41% (p = 0.009) at 1 mM and 47.77 ± 1.67% (p = 0.015) at 0.1 mM. This increase was accompanied by a significant reduction in the S phase (13.83 ± 1.04% vs. 17.50 ± 1.80%, p = 0.006 at 1 mM and 14.53 ± 1.096%, p = 0.015 at 0.1 mM) and an increase in the G2/M phase (23.83 ± 0.309%, p = 0.003 at 1 mM; 26.267 ± 1.744%, p = 0.002 at 0.1 mM). Moreover, the combination of radiotherapy and TMZ at 1 mM led to a reduction in the S phase to 15 ± 0.829% (p = 0.023) and an increase in the G2/M phase (25.77 ± 0.52% vs. 21.83 ± 0.95%, p < 0.001).

3.3.2. Enhanced Apoptosis and Modulation of Cell Viability

The effect of 2HG on cell death mechanisms was evaluated based on apoptosis, necrosis, and overall cell viability. Under normoxia, exposure to 2HG at 1 mM significantly increased early apoptosis (13.73 ± 0.90% vs. 6.67 ± 5.25%, p = 0.019) and total apoptosis (14.25 ± 1.04% vs. 6.89 ± 5.50%, p = 0.020), resulting in decreased cell viability (85.43 ± 1.02% vs. 92.77 ± 5.57%, p = 0.021). A similar pattern was observed at 0.1 mM, where early apoptosis reached 13.01 ± 1.15% (p = 0.036) and total apoptosis 13.43 ± 1.07% (p = 0.036), with viability decreasing to 86.57 ± 1.09% (p = 0.036) (Figure 2B).
The combination of 2HG with TMZ further amplified these effects, increasing early apoptosis (12.27 ± 1.12% vs. 6.67 ± 5.25%, p = 0.041 at 1 mM and 12.33 ± 1.12%, p = 0.040 at 0.1 mM) and total apoptosis (12.92 ± 1.20% vs. 6.89 ± 5.50%, p = 0.038 at 1 mM and 13.01 ± 1.15%, p = 0.036 at 0.1 mM), consequently reducing viability. Under normoxic radiotherapy, administration of 2HG at 1 mM decreased necrosis (1.08 ± 0.55 vs. 2.08 ± 0.45, p = 0.015) and early apoptosis (35.33 ± 2.46 vs. 43.53 ± 0.58, p < 0.001), which was associated with an increase in viability (60.57 ± 2.45 vs. 51.30 ± 0.64, p < 0.001) and a reduction in total cell death (39.43 ± 2.45 vs. 48.66 ± 0.60, p < 0.001). At 0.1 mM, a reduction in early apoptosis (37.33 ± 2.74 vs. 43.53 ± 0.58, p = 0.002) was observed, along with a slight increase in viability (57.30 ± 2.10 vs. 51.30 ± 0.64, p = 0.001).
Under hypoxic conditions, 2HG at 1 mM increased early apoptosis (12.60 ± 0.16 vs. 10.31 ± 1.42, p = 0.009) and total apoptosis (13.29 ± 0.16 vs. 11.03 ± 1.53, p = 0.013), while reducing necrosis (0.65 ± 0.33 vs. 1.19 ± 0.10, p = 0.010). At 0.1 mM, the pro-apoptotic effect was even more pronounced, with early apoptosis doubling (21.00 ± 0.86 vs. 10.31 ± 1.42, p < 0.001) and total apoptosis similarly increasing (21.64 ± 0.95 vs. 11.03 ± 1.53, p < 0.001). When combined with TMZ under hypoxia, 2HG at 1 mM reduced necrosis (0.91 ± 0.18 vs. 1.19 ± 0.10, p = 0.015) without significant changes in apoptosis, whereas at 0.1 mM, marked increases in early (17.00 ± 2.67 vs. 10.31 ± 1.42, p = 0.002) and total apoptosis (17.86 ± 2.73 vs. 11.03 ± 1.53, p = 0.002) were observed.
Under hypoxic radiotherapy, 2HG at 1 mM significantly reduced necrosis (1.05 ± 0.38 vs. 2.98 ± 0.53, p = 0.001) and apoptosis (early: 40.43 ± 3.84 vs. 47.10 ± 5.41, p = 0.046; total: 42.49 ± 4.20 vs. 52.76 ± 5.46, p = 0.012), while at 0.1 mM, there was a reduction in late apoptosis (4.31 ± 0.56 vs. 5.66 ± 1.00, p = 0.028) and in total cell death (45.64 ± 3.95 vs. 52.76 ± 5.46, p = 0.040) coupled with an increase in the fraction of viable cells (51.23 ± 3.34 vs. 44.27 ± 4.91, p = 0.029). The combination of 2HG and TMZ at 1 mM under hypoxic radiotherapy further reduced necrosis (0.89 ± 0.17 vs. 2.98 ± 0.53, p < 0.001) and late apoptosis (4.51 ± 0.28 vs. 5.66 ± 1.00, p = 0.034).
Taken together, 2HG increased apoptosis and reduced viability under baseline and TMZ-treated conditions, whereas under radiotherapy, particularly in hypoxia, it was associated with decreased necrosis and total cell death.

3.3.3. Adjustment of Cellular Proliferation: Modulation of CFSE and Convergence Toward the IDH-Mutant Profile

Cellular proliferation, assessed via CFSE percentage, was also modulated by 2HG treatment. Under normoxic conditions, treatment with 2HG at 0.1 mM reduced CFSE to 23.47 ± 0.31% (p < 0.001), while at 1 mM, the CFSE value was 23.8 ± 0.94% (p = 0.05). The combination of 2HG at 1 mM with TMZ increased CFSE to 25.30 ± 0.34% (p = 0.01), indicating a reduction in proliferation, though not to the same extent as observed in IDH-mut cells (Figure 2C).
Under hypoxia, 2HG at 0.1 mM decreased CFSE to 29.51 ± 1.09% (p = 0.02), and when combined with TMZ, CFSE markedly dropped to 1.68 ± 0.08% (p = 0.03). In the context of radiotherapy under hypoxia, IDH-wt cells exhibited a CFSE of 34.00 ± 0.67% compared to 72.13 ± 4.02% in IDH-mut cells (p < 0.001); the addition of 2HG at 1 mM and 0.1 mM reduced CFSE to 31.28 ± 1.74% (p = 0.01) and 30.62 ± 1.09% (p = 0.001), respectively.

3.3.4. Inhibition of Migration and Morphological Transformation: Impact on Migratory Area and Cellular Parameters

2HG exposure in IDH-wt cells under normoxia modulated migratory behavior and morphology, with effects varying according to treatment. While the combination with radiotherapy reduced migration and altered morphology, 2HG alone showed a tendency to enhance migration over time.
In cells treated with 2HG alone, the migratory area remained similar to controls during the first 48 h (5390 µm2 at 12 h, 15,443 µm2 at 24 h, and 20,815 µm2 at 48 h). By day 6, it increased to 56,390 µm2, significantly higher than that of the control group (38,463 µm2, p = 0.029). A similar increase was observed with the addition of TMZ at 24 h (11,070 µm2, p = 0.012) (Figure 1D).
In contrast, combining 2HG with radiotherapy significantly reduced the migratory area at 48 h compared to radiotherapy alone (3855 µm2 vs. 11,265 µm2, p = 0.003). The triple combination with radiotherapy and TMZ further decreased migration at 24 h (4802 µm2 vs. 7125 µm2, p = 0.028) and 48 h (4198 µm2 vs. 12,853 µm2, p = 0.011).
Morphological analysis showed reduced circularity after 2HG treatment (0.250 ± 0.010 vs. 0.316 ± 0.024, p = 0.001), along with decreases in Feret diameter and cell circumference at 24 and 48 h (p < 0.001 and p = 0.010). Combined with TMZ, 2HG further reduced the circumference (0.291 ± 0.012, p < 0.001) and increased signal intensity at day 6 (270.176 ± 71.159), similar to values observed in IDH-mut cells treated with TMZ (119.448, p = 0.018).

3.3.5. Phenotypic Reprogramming: Transition Toward a Less Differentiated State

Analysis of phenotypic markers demonstrated that 2HG induces a reprogramming toward a less differentiated state in IDH-wt cells. Under normoxic conditions, the addition of 2HG at 1 mM increased total CD24 expression (95.30 ± 0.28 vs. 91.80 ± 2.26 in control, p = 0.011) and the CD24+CD44 population (0.47 ± 0.09 vs. 0.17 ± 0.04, p = 0.001). A similar increase was observed at 0.1 mM (94.77 ± 2.25, p = 0.056), and in the presence of TMZ, the total CD24 positive cell population reached 95.10 ± 1.92 (p = 0.034). The fraction of CD44CD24 cells increased with 2HG at 0.1 mM (0.43 ± 0.28 vs. 0.06 ± 0.04, p = 0.023) and 1 mM (0.13 ± 0.04, p = 0.046).
The dot plot of CD44 positive cells revealed two distinct subpopulations. They were analyzed separately and designated as CD44+ High and CD44+ Low, based on their relative CD44 expression levels (Figure 2E). Under normoxia with 2HG at 1 mM, a reduction in High_CD44 (96.03 ± 2.03 vs. 92.60 ± 0.57, p = 0.009) was accompanied by an increase in Low_CD44 (7.90 ± 0.54 vs. 4.20 ± 2.26, p = 0.010), an effect that was more pronounced with 2HG at 0.1 mM (High_CD44: 96.03 ± 2.03 vs. 87.37 ± 4.80, p = 0.008; Low_CD44: 13.00 ± 4.71 vs. 4.20 ± 2.26, p = 0.008) and was comparable to the effect observed with TMZ (91.27 ± 2.85, p = 0.017).
Under normoxic radiotherapy, 2HG at 1 mM increased total CD24 (29.23 ± 4.37 vs. 13.53 ± 6.84, p = 0.004) and the CD44+CD24+ population (34.13 ± 3.58 vs. 20.17 ± 6.91, p = 0.006), with similar changes observed at 0.1 mM (total CD24: 28.00 ± 5.51, p = 0.008; CD44+CD24+: 32.66 ± 3.73, p = 0.010).
Under hypoxic conditions, 2HG at 1 mM significantly reduced total CD24 (93.23 ± 2.39 vs. 96.07 ± 0.95, p = 0.035), a trend that persisted when combined with TMZ (93.50 ± 1.34, p = 0.010 at 1 mM and 93.20 ± 2.26, p = 0.029 at 0.1 mM). The CD44+CD24 population increased with 2HG at 1 mM (25.73 ± 8.30 vs. 14.13 ± 4.36, p = 0.024) and with the combination of 2HG + TMZ at 1 mM (26.90 ± 5.17, p = 0.005) and 0.1 mM (27.60 ± 7.65, p = 0.011), while the CD44+CD24+ fraction decreased with 2HG at 1 mM (74.07 ± 8.25 vs. 85.57 ± 4.36, p = 0.024) and with 2HG + TMZ at 1 mM (72.67 ± 5.46, p = 0.005) and 0.1 mM (72.07 ± 7.54, p = 0.011).
Under hypoxic radiotherapy, 2HG at 1 mM reduced the CD44+CD24 population (59.83 ± 0.89 vs. 70.47 ± 2.45, p < 0.001) and increased CD44+CD24+ (38.73 ± 1.54 vs. 28.87 ± 2.37, p < 0.001); similar effects were observed with 2HG at 0.1 mM (CD44+CD24: 54.30 ± 1.70, p < 0.001; CD44+CD24+: 44.96 ± 1.69, p < 0.001). Additionally, the combination of 2HG and TMZ under hypoxic radiotherapy further decreased the CD44+CD24 population while increasing CD44+CD24+, consolidating a phenotypic profile that closely resembles that of IDH-mut cells.
In summary, the results indicate that 2HG exposure led to notable changes in the differentiation markers of IDH-wt cells, showing phenotypic reprogramming. Under normoxia, 2HG increased total CD24 and both the CD24+CD44 and CD44CD24 populations, and it altered CD44+ distribution by reducing High_CD44 and increasing Low_CD44. Under normoxic radiotherapy, 2HG also elevated total CD24 and the CD44+CD24+ population. Conversely, under hypoxia, 2HG decreased total CD24 and the CD44+CD24+ fraction, while increasing the CD44+CD24 population. When combined with radiotherapy under hypoxia, 2HG and TMZ reinforced this phenotypic modification, further reducing CD44+CD24 and increasing CD44+CD24+.

3.3.6. Multivariate Analysis of Experimental Conditions

To evaluate whether the experimental variables could differentiate sample groups, a UMAP dimensionality reduction was performed using all measured parameters. As shown in Figure 3A, samples were segregated according to IDH status, oxygen conditions, and treatment. Clustering was particularly evident in groups treated with 2 Gy or 2 Gy + TMZ, especially under hypoxia, where the effect of 2HG treatment on IDH-wt cells was observed by the clear separation of this group from IDH-wt cells without 2HG, despite undergoing radiotherapy or combined therapy. In contrast, control and TMZ-only groups showed more dispersed distributions. Hierarchical clustering and heatmaps (Figure 3B) further supported these groupings, revealing consistent patterns within treatments and highlighting differences between normoxic and hypoxic conditions.

3.4. D-2-Hydroxyglutarate Modulates Tumor Growth and Morphology, Mimicking IDH Mutation Effects In Vivo

To validate whether the in vitro effects of 2HG translate to an in vivo context, we conducted a pilot study in which xenografts were grown in immunodeficient mice. In this model, we analyzed the impact of 2HG on tumor growth and morphology. IDH-wt tumors exhibited the largest volumes, averaging 20.73 ± 9.19 mm3, with a mean Feret diameter of 5.57 ± 1.11 mm and a surface area of 61.41 ± 20.06 mm2. These tumors displayed an elongated morphology, with a roundness of 0.59 ± 0.03 and flatness of 1.27 ± 0.21. The voxel count averaged 4415.50 ± 1958.42.
Exposure to 2HG in IDH-wt tumors led to a marked reduction in tumor volume (12.75 ± 8.79 mm3) and Feret diameter (4.12 ± 1.07 mm), accompanied by a decrease in surface area (35.82 ± 20.05 mm2) in comparison with IDH-wt mice. Notably, 2HG-treated tumors exhibited a shift toward a more rounded phenotype (roundness = 0.72 ± 0.07, p = 0.049 vs. IDH-wt), alongside decreased flatness (1.10 ± 0.06) and elongation (1.39 ± 0.24). The number of voxels also dropped to 2715.00 ± 1873.14.
IDH-mut tumors displayed the most compact and spherical architecture in comparison with IDH-wt mice, with a mean volume of 6.17 ± 1.52 mm3 and Feret diameter of 3.43 ± 0.32 mm. Surface area was substantially lower in this group (22.28 ± 8.41 mm2, p = 0.051 vs. IDH-wt), while roundness was the highest among the groups (0.76 ± 0.17). Flatness (1.10 ± 0.02) and elongation (1.25 ± 0.01) were also reduced. The voxel count was lowest at 1314.50 ± 323.15. These quantitative imaging analyses revealed striking differences in tumor volume and morphology across the experimental groups, highlighting the influence of IDH mutation and 2HG exposure on tumor architecture (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

4.1. IDH Status Influences Tumor Growth and Adaptability

In this work, we present a study of the impact of IDH mutation and its metabolic product, 2HG, on the growth and behavior of IDH-wt GBM cells under various environmental conditions, with particular focus on cellular stress responses. For the first time to our knowledge, we report an increase in the radio- and chemo-sensitivity of IDH-wt glioma cells after 2HG exposure. We extensively characterize the cellular and biological response of wildtype and IDH-mutated U87 cells under different conditions and treatments and irradiation exposure. Our results strongly suggest a potential role of 2HG as a modulator of tumor progression, adaptability, and therapy sensitivity in gliomas.
Although IDH mutations are associated with better clinical outcomes, their relationship with tumor progression is complex. Our data revealed significant differences in the growth dynamics and migration capabilities of IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells. On the one hand, IDH-wt cells grew faster than IDH-mut cells under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. While both cell types showed reduced growth under hypoxia, IDH-wt cells adapted better, maintaining a higher proliferation rate over time in low-oxygen environments.
This difference in adaptability may be related to cell cycle regulation and differential proliferative profiles. CFSE-based flow cytometry also revealed distinct proliferation dynamics. Under normoxia, IDH-mutant cells proliferated more rapidly than IDH-wt cells. Under hypoxia, proliferation decreased in both genotypes, but IDH-mut cells still showed higher rates. These proliferation profiles align well with previous reports of reduced HIF-1α stabilization in IDH-mut gliomas and increased glycolytic adaptation in IDH-wt tumors [28,29]. On the other hand, our orthotopic glioblastoma xenograft model reveals that IDH-wt tumors grew significantly faster than IDH-mut tumors, with volumes increasing over three-fold, larger Feret diameters and surface areas, and more elongated morphology. All these findings indicate a more aggressive and infiltrative phenotype.

4.2. 2HG Modulates Therapy Sensitivity and Phenotypic Traits

TMZ and radiation treatment induced cell cycle changes in both genotypes, with IDH-mut cells exhibiting a stronger G2/M arrest. Despite this, apoptotic responses were lower in IDH-mut cells, particularly under hypoxia, where IDH-wt cells showed significantly higher apoptosis. IDH-mut cells also showed stronger proliferation decreases after TMZ and radiation exposure. These results align with clinical data indicating superior radiochemotherapy responses in IDH1-mut gliomas [30,31]. Collectively, all these data suggest a potential role of IDH mutation in the interaction between glioma cells and the tumor microenvironment. Our results support the idea that IDH mutation and 2HG regulate a delicate balance between cell cycle progression, stress response, and cell death, influenced by external stressors like hypoxia and therapy.
IDH mutations lead to 2HG accumulation [32], altering glutaminolysis and lipid metabolism and supporting short-term proliferation. Other research links IDH1 mutations to mTOR pathway activation [33], promoting survival signaling, while 2HG modulates epigenetic regulators and provides early growth advantages [34,35]. However, this advantage diminishes over time due to impaired metabolic flexibility and stress responses in IDH-mut cells [36].
In our study, exogenous 2HG administration to IDH-wt cells mimicked some phenotypic features of IDH-mut cells. On the one hand, 2HG increased early and total apoptosis, especially when combined with TMZ, leading to reduced viability. On the other hand, 2HG increased proliferation in IDH-wt cells, especially under hypoxia. Paradoxically, under radiotherapy, 2HG protected cells, reducing apoptosis and necrosis while enhancing survival. This dual response was also observed under hypoxia, where 2HG promoted apoptosis in some contexts, particularly with TMZ, but reduced cell death when combined with radiation, particularly at lower doses.
Although migration assays show only marginal differences between wildtype and IDH-mutant glioma cells, under radiation or radiation plus TMZ, 2HG suppressed IDH-wt migration. Importantly, intraperitoneal administration of 2HG to IDH-wt xenografted mice led to significant tumor shrinkage, evidenced by smaller Feret diameters and surface areas. The 2HG-treated tumors were more compact, with increased roundness and reduced elongation, implying less invasive growth, consistent our findings in U87 cells. Our results support the notion that IDH-mut cells are more radiosensitive and show that 2HG induces similar vulnerability in IDH-wt cells both in vitro and in vivo.

4.3. Phenotypic Reprogramming via 2HG Exposure

Beyond its impact on proliferation and therapy response, 2HG also induced notable phenotypic reprogramming in IDH-wt glioma cells. In our model, exogenous 2HG altered the expression of CD24 and CD44 in IDH-wt glioma cells. Under normoxia, 2HG increased total CD24 levels, expanded the CD24+/CD44 subpopulation, and reduced CD44 High expression, resembling the IDH-mut phenotype. This agrees with prior findings showing that 2HG upregulates CD24 by promoting DNA hypomethylation and decreasing repressive marks like H3K27me3 [37]. CD24 is linked to less aggressive behavior and better prognosis, while CD44 is associated with mesenchymal, therapy-resistant states [38]. The observed shift towards higher CD24 and lower CD44 suggests a transition to a less invasive, more therapy-sensitive phenotype.
Importantly, our aim was not to induce stable phenotypic reprogramming, but rather to determine whether transient exposure to 2HG could sensitize IDH-wt glioma cells to conventional therapies. Given the aggressive nature and rapid progression of GBM, even short-term modulation prior to standard treatment may hold clinical value.
Overall, our findings highlight the dual and context-dependent role of 2HG as both an oncometabolite and a modulator of therapy response and cellular phenotype. These effects are consistent with the extensive epigenetic remodeling observed in IDH-mutant gliomas, where 2HG promotes DNA and histone hypermethylation by inhibiting α-KG–dependent demethylases. Both clinical and preclinical studies have confirmed these alterations in patients and model systems [15,39]. Our findings align with these observations, supporting the hypothesis that 2HG is not only a byproduct but also an active modulator of glioma cell behavior.

4.4. Limitations and Future Directions

Our study has certain limitations. First, the in vitro experiments were conducted using a single IDH1-mut glioma cell line generated via CRISPR-Cas9, which provided a consistent genetic background and minimized variability due to inter-patient differences. However, this also restricted the breadth of our observations to a single model. Future studies will be necessary to validate these findings across additional IDH-mut cell lines and patient-derived models.
Second, although we incorporated an orthotopic xenograft model in mice to address this limitation and better approximate the tumor microenvironment, allowing us to study tumor behavior within the brain in a more physiologically relevant context, this model does not capture immune–tumor interactions. The use of immunodeficient mice allowed us to isolate the intrinsic effects of 2HG on glioma biology without confounding immune influences. However, it also precludes evaluation of potential immunomodulatory roles of 2HG, since immune system interactions are critical regulators of tumor progression and therapy response [40]. Future studies using immunocompetent or humanized models will be necessary to assess whether 2HG influences glioma immunogenicity or tumor–immune dynamics.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our results demonstrate that IDH mutations and the accumulation of their oncometabolite 2HG profoundly alter glioblastoma cell behavior across multiple biological levels, including proliferation, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, migration, and phenotypic plasticity. While IDH-mut cells may exhibit early proliferative activity and enhanced basal migration under favorable conditions, they show impaired adaptability to stress, particularly under hypoxia or in response to cytotoxic treatments. This vulnerability is characterized by a reduced capacity to activate apoptotic pathways despite G2/M arrest, as well as a context-dependent modulation of survival and migration in the presence of 2HG. Conversely, 2HG exposure in IDH-wt cells often recapitulates features of the mutant phenotype, altering cell cycle dynamics, increasing radiosensitivity, shifting CD24/CD44 expression, and sensitizing cells to TMZ.
These findings underscore the complex role of 2HG in modulating glioma cell behavior, particularly under stress conditions, and suggest that its context-dependent effects could be harnessed to enhance the efficacy of current treatments. By mimicking key features of the IDH-mut phenotype, such as increased radiosensitivity and altered expression of therapeutic targets, 2HG or its downstream pathways may offer promising avenues for the development of novel, targeted therapies in IDH-wt gliomas.

Author Contributions

G.R., T.S.-M. and D.M. contributed to the conceptualization of this study, validation of the findings, and the review and editing of the manuscript. G.R. was also responsible for data curation, conducted formal statistical analyses, developed software tools for data processing and image analysis, prepared the initial draft of the manuscript, and created this study’s visualizations. J.M., C.F.-G., L.M.-H., P.C., J.F.H.-E. and G.R. led the investigation, carried out the in vitro and in vivo experiments, and were involved in developing the study methodology. V.T.-M. supplied critical resources and expertise for the xenograft model. All authors contributed to the critical review of the manuscript and approved its final version. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring its integrity and accuracy. Additionally, T.S.-M. and D.M. supervised the project, managed its administration, and secured funding to support the research. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the following grants: grants PID2019-108973RB-C22 and PID2023-147163OB-C21 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and FEDER, UE; grants GRISOLIAP/2021/119, CIAICO/2022/038, INVEST/2023/180 and IDIFEDER/2021/072 funded by Conselleria de Educació, Universitats y Ocupació of Generalitat Valenciana.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universitat de València (protocol code 2022VSCPEA0172, approved on 22 August 2022). The procedure was approved with no requirement for retrospective evaluation. This study was conducted at the Animal Facility of the Faculty of Medicine—Blasco Ibáñez Campus, under the responsibility of T.S.-M.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

In support of research reproducibility and open science, the data supporting the findings of this study, including processed datasets and detailed methodologies, are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to institutional policy and project-related confidentiality.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their sincere appreciation to the entire veterinary team, with gratitude to Ana Díaz for her dedicated support throughout the surgical procedures and animal accommodation in UCIM-Universitat de València, including her invaluable assistance in resolving any challenges encountered. We also gratefully acknowledge Musta Ezzedin Ayoub from the UCIM-Universitat de València imaging team for his significant contribution and dedicated efforts in capturing the necessary images for this study. BMRI-3T (MR Solutions) is registered at the U26 facility of ICTS NANBIOSIS at the Universitat de València. AI tools were used strictly for linguistic refinement.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. There were no personal circumstances or interests that could be perceived as inappropriately influencing the representation or interpretation of reported research results. Furthermore, the funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
IDHIsocitrate Dehydrogenase
IDH-wtIDH Wildtype
IDH-mutIDH Mutant
TMZTemozolomide
2HGD-2-hydroxyglutarate
2GyRadiation
CFSECarboxyfluorescein Succinimidyl Ester
MRIMagnetic Resonance Imaging
NNormoxia
HHypoxia
RRadiation

References

  1. Louis, D.N.; Perry, A.; Wesseling, P.; Brat, D.J.; Cree, I.A.; Figarella-Branger, D.; Hawkins, C.; Ng, H.K.; Pfister, S.M.; Reifenberger, G.; et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Summary. Neuro-Oncology 2021, 23, 1231–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Brat, D.J.; Aldape, K.; Colman, H.; Holland, E.C.; Louis, D.N.; Jenkins, R.B.; Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B.K.; Perry, A.; Reifenberger, G.; Stupp, R.; et al. cIMPACT-NOW Update 3: Recommended Diagnostic Criteria for “Diffuse Astrocytic Glioma, IDH-Wildtype, with Molecular Features of Glioblastoma, WHO Grade IV”. Acta Neuropathol. 2018, 136, 805–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hartmann, C.; Hentschel, B.; Wick, W.; Capper, D.; Felsberg, J.; Simon, M.; Westphal, M.; Schackert, G.; Meyermann, R.; Pietsch, T.; et al. Patients with IDH1 Wild Type Anaplastic Astrocytomas Exhibit Worse Prognosis than IDH1-Mutated Glioblastomas, and IDH1 Mutation Status Accounts for the Unfavorable Prognostic Effect of Higher Age: Implications for Classification of Gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2010, 120, 707–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stupp, R.; Mason, W.P.; van den Bent, M.J.; Weller, M.; Fisher, B.; Taphoorn, M.J.B.; Belanger, K.; Brandes, A.A.; Marosi, C.; Bogdahn, U.; et al. Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Valdebenito, S.; D’Amico, D.; Eugenin, E. Novel Approaches for Glioblastoma Treatment: Focus on Tumor Heterogeneity, Treatment Resistance, and Computational Tools. Cancer Rep. 2019, 2, e1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alshiekh Nasany, R.; de la Fuente, M.I. Therapies for IDH-Mutant Gliomas. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2023, 23, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Komori, T. Grading of Adult Diffuse Gliomas According to the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System. Lab. Investig. 2022, 102, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Christians, A.; Adel-Horowski, A.; Banan, R.; Lehmann, U.; Bartels, S.; Behling, F.; Barrantes-Freer, A.; Stadelmann, C.; Rohde, V.; Stockhammer, F.; et al. The Prognostic Role of IDH Mutations in Homogeneously Treated Patients with Anaplastic Astrocytomas and Glioblastomas. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2019, 7, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shirahata, M.; Ono, T.; Stichel, D.; Schrimpf, D.; Reuss, D.E.; Sahm, F.; Koelsche, C.; Wefers, A.; Reinhardt, A.; Huang, K.; et al. Novel, Improved Grading System(S) for IDH-Mutant Astrocytic Gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2018, 136, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Christians, A.; Banan, R.; Stockhammer, F.; Hartmann, C. PATH-11. The Prognostic Role of IDH Mutations in Homogeneously Treated Patients with Malignant Diffuse Astrocytomas. Neuro-Oncology 2019, 21, vi145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nobusawa, S.; Watanabe, T.; Kleihues, P.; Ohgaki, H. IDH1 Mutations as Molecular Signature and Predictive Factor of Secondary Glioblastomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 6002–6007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Levallet, G.; Creveuil, C.; Bekaert, L.; Péres, E.; Planchard, G.; Lecot-Cotigny, S.; Guillamo, J.-S.; Emery, E.; Zalcman, G.; Lechapt-Zalcman, E. Promoter Hypermethylation of Genes Encoding for RASSF/Hippo Pathway Members Reveals Specific Alteration Pattern in Diffuse Gliomas. J. Mol. Diagn. 2019, 21, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Grassian, A.R.; Parker, S.J.; Davidson, S.M.; Divakaruni, A.S.; Green, C.R.; Zhang, X.; Slocum, K.L.; Pu, M.; Lin, F.; Vickers, C.; et al. IDH1 Mutations Alter Citric Acid Cycle Metabolism and Increase Dependence on Oxidative Mitochondrial Metabolism. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 3317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Borger, D.R.; Tanabe, K.K.; Fan, K.C.; Lopez, H.U.; Fantin, V.R.; Straley, K.S.; Schenkein, D.P.; Hezel, A.F.; Ancukiewicz, M.; Liebman, H.M.; et al. Frequent Mutation of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH)1 and IDH2 in Cholangiocarcinoma Identified Through Broad-Based Tumor Genotyping. Oncologist 2012, 17, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Turcan, S.; Rohle, D.; Goenka, A.; Walsh, L.A.; Fang, F.; Yilmaz, E.; Campos, C.; Fabius, A.W.M.; Lu, C.; Ward, P.S.; et al. IDH1 Mutation Is Sufficient to Establish the Glioma Hypermethylator Phenotype. Nature 2012, 483, 479–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lu, C.; Ward, P.S.; Kapoor, G.S.; Rohle, D.; Turcan, S.; Abdel-Wahab, O.; Edwards, C.R.; Khanin, R.; Figueroa, M.E.; Melnick, A.; et al. IDH Mutation Impairs Histone Demethylation and Results in a Block to Cell Differentiation. Nature 2012, 483, 474–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dang, L.; White, D.W.; Gross, S.; Bennett, B.D.; Bittinger, M.A.; Driggers, E.M.; Fantin, V.R.; Jang, H.G.; Jin, S.; Keenan, M.C.; et al. Cancer-Associated IDH1 Mutations Produce 2-Hydroxyglutarate Author Information R132H Mutant IDH1 Structure Files Are Deposited in the Protein Data Bank under Accession Code 3INM. Nature 2009, 462, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Figueroa, M.E.; Abdel-Wahab, O.; Lu, C.; Ward, P.S.; Patel, J.; Shih, A.; Li, Y.; Bhagwat, N.; Vasanthakumar, A.; Fernandez, H.F.; et al. Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 Mutations Result in a Hypermethylation Phenotype, Disrupt TET2 Function, and Impair Hematopoietic Differentiation. Cancer Cell 2010, 18, 553–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hasselblatt, M.; Jaber, M.; Reuss, D.; Grauer, O.; Bibo, A.; Terwey, S.; Schick, U.; Ebel, H.; Niederstadt, T.; Stummer, W.; et al. Diffuse Astrocytoma, IDH-Wildtype: A Dissolving Diagnosis. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2018, 77, 422–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. BD Biosciences. FlowJoTM Software, version 10.8; Flow cytometry analysis software; BD Biosciences: San Jose, CA, USA, 2023.
  21. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An Open-Source Platform for Biological-Image Analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Russell, W.; Burch, R. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Med. J. Aust. 1960, 1, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kilkenny, C.; Browne, W.J.; Cuthill, I.C.; Emerson, M.; Altman, D.G. Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8, e1000412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Langford, D.J.; Bailey, A.L.; Chanda, M.L.; Clarke, S.E.; Drummond, T.E.; Echols, S.; Glick, S.; Ingrao, J.; Klassen-Ross, T.; LaCroix-Fralish, M.L.; et al. Coding of Facial Expressions of Pain in the Laboratory Mouse. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 447–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Baumann, B.C.; Dorsey, J.F.; Benci, J.L.; Joh, D.Y.; Kao, G.D. Stereotactic Intracranial Implantation and In Vivo Bioluminescent Imaging of Tumor Xenografts in a Mouse Model System of Glioblastoma Multiforme. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE 2012, e4089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, 2nd ed.; Use R! Series; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gu, Z.; Eils, R.; Schlesner, M. Complex Heatmaps Reveal Patterns and Correlations in Multidimensional Genomic Data. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 2847–2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. McAfee, D.; Moyer, M.; Queen, J.; Mortazavi, A.; Boddeti, U.; Bachani, M.; Zaghloul, K.; Ksendzovsky, A. Differential Metabolic Alterations in IDH1 Mutant vs. Wildtype Glioma Cells Promote Epileptogenesis through Distinctive Mechanisms. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1288918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, S.; Lin, Y.; Xu, W.; Jiang, W.; Zhai, Z.; Wang, P.; Yu, W.; Li, Z.; Gong, L.; Peng, Y.; et al. Glioma-Derived Mutations in IDH1 Dominantly Inhibit IDH1 Catalytic Activity and Induce HIF-1alpha. Science 2009, 324, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Weller, J.; Katzendobler, S.; Blobner, J.; Thiele, F.; Becker, H.; Quach, S.; Egensperger, R.; Niyazi, M.; Suchorska, B.; Thon, N.; et al. Limited Efficacy of Temozolomide Alone for Astrocytoma, IDH-Mutant, CNS WHO Grades 2 or 3. J. Neurooncol. 2022, 160, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tran, A.N.; Lai, A.; Li, S.; Pope, W.B.; Teixeira, S.; Harris, R.J.; Woodworth, D.C.; Nghiemphu, P.L.; Cloughesy, T.F.; Ellingson, B.M. Increased Sensitivity to Radiochemotherapy in IDH1 Mutant Glioblastoma as Demonstrated by Serial Quantitative MR Volumetry. Neuro-Oncology 2013, 16, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Waitkus, M.S.; Pirozzi, C.J.; Moure, C.J.; Diplas, B.H.; Hansen, L.J.; Carpenter, A.B.; Yang, R.; Wang, Z.; Ingram, B.O.; Karoly, E.D.; et al. Adaptive Evolution of the GDH2 Allosteric Domain Promotes Gliomagenesis by Resolving IDH1R132H Induced Metabolic Liabilities. Cancer Res. 2017, 78, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Avsar, T.; Kose, T.B.; Oksal, M.D.; Turan, G.; Kilic, T. IDH1 Mutation Activates mTOR Signaling Pathway, Promotes Cell Proliferation and Invasion in Glioma Cells. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 9241–9249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Reitman, Z.J.; Jin, G.; Karoly, E.D.; Spasojevic, I.; Yang, J.; Kinzler, K.W.; He, Y.; Bigner, D.D.; Vogelstein, B.; Yan, H. Profiling the Effects of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 and 2 Mutations on the Cellular Metabolome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3270–3275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Garrett, M.; Fujii, Y.; Osaka, N.; Ito, D.; Hirota, Y.; Sasaki, A.T. Emerging Roles of Wild-Type and Mutant IDH1 in Growth, Metabolism and Therapeutics of Glioma. In Gliomas; Debinski, W., Ed.; Exon Publications: Brisbane, Australia, 2021; ISBN 978-0-6450017-4-7. [Google Scholar]
  36. Han, S.; Liu, Y.; Cai, S.J.; Qian, M.; Ding, J.; Larion, M.; Gilbert, M.R.; Yang, C. IDH Mutation in Glioma: Molecular Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Targets. Br. J. Cancer 2020, 122, 1580–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tiburcio, P.D.B.; Locke, M.C.; Bhaskara, S.; Chandrasekharan, M.B.; Huang, L.E. The Neural Stem-Cell Marker CD24 Is Specifically Upregulated in IDH-Mutant Glioma. Transl. Oncol. 2020, 13, 100819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bhat, K.P.L.; Balasubramaniyan, V.; Vaillant, B.; Ezhilarasan, R.; Hummelink, K.; Hollingsworth, F.; Wani, K.; Heathcock, L.; James, J.D.; Goodman, L.D.; et al. Mesenchymal Differentiation Mediated by NF-κB Promotes Radiation Resistance in Glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 2013, 24, 331–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huang, L.E. Friend or Foe—IDH1 Mutations in Glioma 10 Years on. Carcinogenesis 2019, 40, 1299–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hanahan, D. Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions. Cancer Discov. 2022, 12, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Differences between IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. (A) Ribbon bar chart of the growth curve of IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells. (B) Cell cycle histogram of the distribution in IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells (x-axis: PE-A signal intensity; y-axis: number of events). (C) Gated dot plots of cell death in IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells. Quadrants indicate necrosis (Nec.), late apoptosis (L. Apop.), early apoptosis (E. Apop.), and viable cells (V.). Total cell death corresponds to the sum of necrosis and early and late apoptosis. Color intensity reflects event density in each region of the plot. (D) Bar chart of cell migration in IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells under normoxia. (E) Stacked bar chart of CD44+ marker expression in IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells. Lower bars represent CD44+ High and upper bars represent CD44+ Low populations. (F) Bar chart of CD24+ marker expression in IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells. (G) Gated dot plots of CD24 and CD44 co-expression profiles in IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells. Quadrants: Q1 = CD24/CD44+, Q2 = CD24+/CD44+, Q3 = CD24/CD44, and Q4 = CD24+/CD44. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between IDH-wt and IDH-mut under normoxic and hypoxic conditions (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001). IDH-wt: IDH wildtype; IDH-mut: IDH mutant.
Figure 1. Differences between IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. (A) Ribbon bar chart of the growth curve of IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells. (B) Cell cycle histogram of the distribution in IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells (x-axis: PE-A signal intensity; y-axis: number of events). (C) Gated dot plots of cell death in IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells. Quadrants indicate necrosis (Nec.), late apoptosis (L. Apop.), early apoptosis (E. Apop.), and viable cells (V.). Total cell death corresponds to the sum of necrosis and early and late apoptosis. Color intensity reflects event density in each region of the plot. (D) Bar chart of cell migration in IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells under normoxia. (E) Stacked bar chart of CD44+ marker expression in IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells. Lower bars represent CD44+ High and upper bars represent CD44+ Low populations. (F) Bar chart of CD24+ marker expression in IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells. (G) Gated dot plots of CD24 and CD44 co-expression profiles in IDH-wt and IDH-mut cells. Quadrants: Q1 = CD24/CD44+, Q2 = CD24+/CD44+, Q3 = CD24/CD44, and Q4 = CD24+/CD44. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between IDH-wt and IDH-mut under normoxic and hypoxic conditions (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001). IDH-wt: IDH wildtype; IDH-mut: IDH mutant.
Biomedicines 13 01584 g001
Figure 2. Differences between IDH-wt, IDH-wt + 2HG (0.1 mM), IDH-wt + 2HG (1 mM), and IDH-mut cells in response to TMZ (temozolomide), 2 Gy radiation, and the combination (TMZ + 2 Gy) under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. (A) Stacked bar chart of cell cycle distribution (G1, S, and G2 phases). Cell groups are indicated by color, and treatment conditions by patterns. (B) Bar chart of total cell death (sum of early apoptosis, late apoptosis, and necrosis). Cell groups are represented by color, and treatments by patterns. (C) Bar chart of cell proliferation across treatment conditions. Cell groups are represented by color, and treatments by patterns. (D) Bar chart of cell migration at 12, 24, 48 h, and 6 days. Below, representative images of wound healing at 48 h are shown. (E) Heatmap of CD44+ and CD24+ marker expression (z-score scale). Blue indicates higher expression values, and red indicates lower values. N: Normoxia, H: Hypoxia, IDH-wt: IDH wildtype; IDH-mut: IDH mutant; 2HG: 2-hydroxyglutarate; 2Gy: 2 Gray dose of ionizing X-ray radiation.
Figure 2. Differences between IDH-wt, IDH-wt + 2HG (0.1 mM), IDH-wt + 2HG (1 mM), and IDH-mut cells in response to TMZ (temozolomide), 2 Gy radiation, and the combination (TMZ + 2 Gy) under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. (A) Stacked bar chart of cell cycle distribution (G1, S, and G2 phases). Cell groups are indicated by color, and treatment conditions by patterns. (B) Bar chart of total cell death (sum of early apoptosis, late apoptosis, and necrosis). Cell groups are represented by color, and treatments by patterns. (C) Bar chart of cell proliferation across treatment conditions. Cell groups are represented by color, and treatments by patterns. (D) Bar chart of cell migration at 12, 24, 48 h, and 6 days. Below, representative images of wound healing at 48 h are shown. (E) Heatmap of CD44+ and CD24+ marker expression (z-score scale). Blue indicates higher expression values, and red indicates lower values. N: Normoxia, H: Hypoxia, IDH-wt: IDH wildtype; IDH-mut: IDH mutant; 2HG: 2-hydroxyglutarate; 2Gy: 2 Gray dose of ionizing X-ray radiation.
Biomedicines 13 01584 g002
Figure 3. Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) and hierarchical clustering heatmaps of experimental conditions. (A) UMAP plots of experimental conditions under normoxia (top row) and hypoxia (bottom row) across different treatments. Each point represents a sample. Plot columns correspond to treatment conditions: control, TMZ, 2 Gy radiation, and the combination (2 Gy + TMZ). (B) Hierarchical clustering heatmaps of samples under normoxic (right) and hypoxic (left) conditions. Red indicates higher values; blue indicates lower values. N: Normoxia, H: Hypoxia, IDH-wt: IDH wildtype; IDH-mut: IDH mutant; 2HG: 2-hydroxyglutarate; 2Gy: 2 Gray dose of ionizing X-ray radiation.
Figure 3. Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) and hierarchical clustering heatmaps of experimental conditions. (A) UMAP plots of experimental conditions under normoxia (top row) and hypoxia (bottom row) across different treatments. Each point represents a sample. Plot columns correspond to treatment conditions: control, TMZ, 2 Gy radiation, and the combination (2 Gy + TMZ). (B) Hierarchical clustering heatmaps of samples under normoxic (right) and hypoxic (left) conditions. Red indicates higher values; blue indicates lower values. N: Normoxia, H: Hypoxia, IDH-wt: IDH wildtype; IDH-mut: IDH mutant; 2HG: 2-hydroxyglutarate; 2Gy: 2 Gray dose of ionizing X-ray radiation.
Biomedicines 13 01584 g003
Figure 4. Longitudinal MRI assessment and quantification of tumor growth and morphology in IDH-wt, IDH-wt + 2HG (27 mM), and IDH-mut mouse groups. (A) Representative T2-weighted MRI images at 24 h and T1-weighted MRI images at 1, 2, and 3 weeks post-implantation in IDH-wt, IDH-wt + 2HG, and IDH-mut groups. (B) Quantification of tumor volume (mm3) at 3 weeks. (C) Tumor surface area measurements (mm2) at 3 weeks. (D) Feret diameter (mm) analysis of tumor size at 3 weeks. (E) Tumor roundness index at 3 weeks. Black lines inside the boxes indicate medians. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between groups (* p < 0.05). IDH-wt: IDH wildtype; IDH-mut: IDH mutant; 2HG: D-2-hydroxyglutarate.
Figure 4. Longitudinal MRI assessment and quantification of tumor growth and morphology in IDH-wt, IDH-wt + 2HG (27 mM), and IDH-mut mouse groups. (A) Representative T2-weighted MRI images at 24 h and T1-weighted MRI images at 1, 2, and 3 weeks post-implantation in IDH-wt, IDH-wt + 2HG, and IDH-mut groups. (B) Quantification of tumor volume (mm3) at 3 weeks. (C) Tumor surface area measurements (mm2) at 3 weeks. (D) Feret diameter (mm) analysis of tumor size at 3 weeks. (E) Tumor roundness index at 3 weeks. Black lines inside the boxes indicate medians. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between groups (* p < 0.05). IDH-wt: IDH wildtype; IDH-mut: IDH mutant; 2HG: D-2-hydroxyglutarate.
Biomedicines 13 01584 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rocha, G.; Francés-Gómez, C.; Megías, J.; Muñoz-Hidalgo, L.; Casanova, P.; Haro-Estevez, J.F.; Teruel-Martí, V.; Monleón, D.; San-Miguel, T. Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Wildtype Glioma Adapts Toward Mutant Phenotypes and Enhanced Therapy Sensitivity Under D-2-Hydroxyglutarate Exposure. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071584

AMA Style

Rocha G, Francés-Gómez C, Megías J, Muñoz-Hidalgo L, Casanova P, Haro-Estevez JF, Teruel-Martí V, Monleón D, San-Miguel T. Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Wildtype Glioma Adapts Toward Mutant Phenotypes and Enhanced Therapy Sensitivity Under D-2-Hydroxyglutarate Exposure. Biomedicines. 2025; 13(7):1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071584

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rocha, Geraldine, Clara Francés-Gómez, Javier Megías, Lisandra Muñoz-Hidalgo, Pilar Casanova, Jose F. Haro-Estevez, Vicent Teruel-Martí, Daniel Monleón, and Teresa San-Miguel. 2025. "Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Wildtype Glioma Adapts Toward Mutant Phenotypes and Enhanced Therapy Sensitivity Under D-2-Hydroxyglutarate Exposure" Biomedicines 13, no. 7: 1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071584

APA Style

Rocha, G., Francés-Gómez, C., Megías, J., Muñoz-Hidalgo, L., Casanova, P., Haro-Estevez, J. F., Teruel-Martí, V., Monleón, D., & San-Miguel, T. (2025). Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Wildtype Glioma Adapts Toward Mutant Phenotypes and Enhanced Therapy Sensitivity Under D-2-Hydroxyglutarate Exposure. Biomedicines, 13(7), 1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071584

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop