Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
This article well describes the immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. However, there may be minor corrections and supplements necessary for the manuscrpt. Detailed comments and suggestion are listed below.
Minor
- The authors described current vaccines, vaccine candidates and adjuvants. It would be better for the reader`s understanding, if they could provide a table for this contents.
- It is necessary to supplement the conclusion of the thesis.
- Check the spacing of the first line of the sentence.
- It would be good to categorize the content numerically. Ex) 1. Inactivated viral vaccine candidates~, 1) Corona Vac; 2) BBIBP-CorV etc...
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
The review is an oversight on SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. This kind of overview is interesting to clear such an important subject in continuous evolution. The review is overall objective, well written and relatively easy to read. I have some major suggestions to make before publication:
-Chapter organization is insufficient. After the introduction there is non number coding.
-It is necessary to introduce at least 1 figure and 1 tabella especially in the section of vaccine description efficacy and use
-The review is missing a conclusion and future highlights on vaccine use and management
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors have faced the highlighted issues according to suggestions. The article is now suitable for publication.