Next Article in Journal
Type B (p, q)-Stirling Numbers via Signed Restricted Growth Functions and Rook Theory
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural Characterization and Inference for an Odds-Scale Lomax Model with Applications to Unit-Interval Data
Previous Article in Journal
IAE-Net: Incremental Learning-Based Attention-Enhanced DenseNet for Robust Facial Emotion Recognition
Previous Article in Special Issue
Distributed Robust Algorithms with Dependent Sampling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Realigning Risk Management Priorities

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Wilmington, NC 28403, USA
Mathematics 2026, 14(6), 1024; https://doi.org/10.3390/math14061024
Submission received: 15 February 2026 / Revised: 11 March 2026 / Accepted: 14 March 2026 / Published: 18 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Statistics with Applications)

Abstract

Industry surveys have shown that efforts of thwarting or at least mitigating strategic, operational, and financial risks may not always be adequately aligned: financial risks are given most of the attention, whereas lesser-mitigated strategic and operational risks account for most of a company’s volatility. The novelty of this article lies in the fact that we have made a sincere effort to efficiently estimate the total number of possible risk sources corresponding to three types of risk, namely, financial, operational and strategic. To address the issue of estimation, we have put forward two different approaches for what we call a proportional method, for a more balanced allocation of a company’s risk management priorities and resources by assuming a probability distribution for each of the three types of risk sources and then estimating the number of risk resources using the method of maximum likelihood. In addition, we have also discussed a scenario in which the risk-thwarting probability corresponding to any of three types of risks might be unknown, along with the unknown value of the number of risk sources.
Keywords: enterprise risk management; risk intensity; risk alignment enterprise risk management; risk intensity; risk alignment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghosh, I. Realigning Risk Management Priorities. Mathematics 2026, 14, 1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14061024

AMA Style

Ghosh I. Realigning Risk Management Priorities. Mathematics. 2026; 14(6):1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14061024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghosh, Indranil. 2026. "Realigning Risk Management Priorities" Mathematics 14, no. 6: 1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14061024

APA Style

Ghosh, I. (2026). Realigning Risk Management Priorities. Mathematics, 14(6), 1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14061024

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop