Next Article in Journal
Design and Evaluation of an Endocrine-Focused Serious Trading Card Game in Undergraduate Medical Education
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring Parent and Teacher Perceptions of Multimodal Educational Games for Engaging Girls in STEM
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing Causal Links Between Mathematics Teaching Efficacy, Attitudes Towards Inclusion, and Efficacy in Implementing Inclusive Practices: A Cross-Lagged Panel Autoregressive Model Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Turning the Page: Pre-Class AI-Generated Podcasts Improve Student Outcomes in Ecology and Environmental Biology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Students’ Perception of the Pedagogical Approach to Geography Teaching and Learning Through Google Earth Pro

by
Marioara Pascu
1,2,* and
Natacha Duroisin
1
1
Education and Learning Sciences Department, University of Mons, 7000 Mons, Belgium
2
Technical College “D.Ghika”, 605200 Comănești, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 268; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020268
Submission received: 29 November 2025 / Revised: 29 January 2026 / Accepted: 3 February 2026 / Published: 8 February 2026

Abstract

This study aims to identify students’ perceptions of the teaching strategy employed by teachers during the Geography teaching–learning process, given that the experimental group used Google Earth Pro. The research sample consisted of 229 participants. The research methods were surveys and statistical analysis. The research hypotheses were based on the following premises: the use of Google Earth Pro software could influence students’ perceptions differently in terms of its impact on their personal learning experience and the teaching strategy applied in the classroom as a whole; there could be an association between how students perceived Google Earth Pro software and the benefits of this digital tool as a learning aid and as an integral part of the teaching strategy. The research hypotheses were statistically validated using the statistical test for comparing proportions and means and the chi-square test—Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The research results highlighted statistically significant differences between the experimental group (B) and the control group (A) in most components of the teaching–learning–assessment strategy (method, learning tools and teaching resources used, student organization) but also in terms of students’ interest and motivation for learning Geography, the content taught, the targeted skills, and the time allocated by students to preparing for Geography lessons. GEP brings numerous benefits to the teaching–learning process of Geography, having a positive impact on: understanding the content taught, applying what has been learned and transposing it into a new context, making connections with other disciplines, critical thinking, consolidating prior knowledge, and improving STEM knowledge.
Keywords: Geography; Google Earth Pro; teaching strategy; teamwork; perception Geography; Google Earth Pro; teaching strategy; teamwork; perception

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pascu, M.; Duroisin, N. Students’ Perception of the Pedagogical Approach to Geography Teaching and Learning Through Google Earth Pro. Educ. Sci. 2026, 16, 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020268

AMA Style

Pascu M, Duroisin N. Students’ Perception of the Pedagogical Approach to Geography Teaching and Learning Through Google Earth Pro. Education Sciences. 2026; 16(2):268. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020268

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pascu, Marioara, and Natacha Duroisin. 2026. "Students’ Perception of the Pedagogical Approach to Geography Teaching and Learning Through Google Earth Pro" Education Sciences 16, no. 2: 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020268

APA Style

Pascu, M., & Duroisin, N. (2026). Students’ Perception of the Pedagogical Approach to Geography Teaching and Learning Through Google Earth Pro. Education Sciences, 16(2), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020268

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop