Next Article in Journal
Light Blue Walls and Tan Flooring: A Culture of Belonging in Engineering Making Spaces (or Not?)
Next Article in Special Issue
Elementary Students’ Reasoning in Drawn Explanations Based on a Scientific Theory
Previous Article in Journal
A Flexible Future Education Model—Strategies Drawn from Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reasoning on Controversial Science Issues in Science Education and Science Communication
 
 
Correction published on 30 December 2021, see Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(1), 21.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preservice Biology Teachers’ Scientific Reasoning Skills and Beliefs about Nature of Science: How Do They Develop and Is There a Mutual Relationship during the Development?

1
Biology Education, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany
2
IPN—Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, 24118 Kiel, Germany
3
Institute of Education, Leibniz University Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Both authors contributed equally.
Educ. Sci. 2021, 11(9), 558; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090558
Submission received: 6 August 2021 / Revised: 10 September 2021 / Accepted: 13 September 2021 / Published: 18 September 2021 / Corrected: 30 December 2021

Abstract

Scientific reasoning (SR) skills and nature of science (NOS) beliefs represent important characteristics of biology teachers’ professional competence. In particular, teacher education at university is formative for the professionalization of future teachers and is thus the focus of the current study. Our study aimed to examine the development of SR skills and NOS beliefs and their mutual relationship during teacher education. We applied paper-and-pencil tests to measure SR skills and NOS beliefs of 299 preservice biology teachers from 25 universities in Germany. The results of linear mixed models and planned comparisons revealed that both SR skills and NOS beliefs develop over the course of the study. Nevertheless, the development of SR skills and multiple aspects of NOS beliefs proceeds in different trajectories. Cross-lagged models showed a complex picture concerning the mutual relationship between SR skills and NOS beliefs during their development (both positive and negative). The current study contributes to the existing research because it is based on longitudinal data and allows—in contrast to cross-sectional research—conclusions about the development of SR skills and NOS beliefs.
Keywords: scientific reasoning; nature of science; preservice teachers; longitudinal study; cross-lagged panel scientific reasoning; nature of science; preservice teachers; longitudinal study; cross-lagged panel

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mahler, D.; Bock, D.; Bruckermann, T. Preservice Biology Teachers’ Scientific Reasoning Skills and Beliefs about Nature of Science: How Do They Develop and Is There a Mutual Relationship during the Development? Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090558

AMA Style

Mahler D, Bock D, Bruckermann T. Preservice Biology Teachers’ Scientific Reasoning Skills and Beliefs about Nature of Science: How Do They Develop and Is There a Mutual Relationship during the Development? Education Sciences. 2021; 11(9):558. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090558

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mahler, Daniela, Denise Bock, and Till Bruckermann. 2021. "Preservice Biology Teachers’ Scientific Reasoning Skills and Beliefs about Nature of Science: How Do They Develop and Is There a Mutual Relationship during the Development?" Education Sciences 11, no. 9: 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090558

APA Style

Mahler, D., Bock, D., & Bruckermann, T. (2021). Preservice Biology Teachers’ Scientific Reasoning Skills and Beliefs about Nature of Science: How Do They Develop and Is There a Mutual Relationship during the Development? Education Sciences, 11(9), 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090558

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop