Near Relation-Based Indoor Positioning Method under Sparse Wi-Fi Fingerprints
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
What problem are the authors trying to solve? In what situation their analysis can be usefully applied? Without this discussion, the analysis is useless.
Author Response
Thanks for the reviewer's guiding suggestions.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
The author has improved the manuscript greatly and answered most of my concerns, except the one : ' In Wi-Fi fingerprinting, Clustering based approaches are also common ways to mitigate the ambiguity issue. They could be discussed in the related work. The authors could have a look at some clustering-based papers [1-4].' The authors have compared K-mean based approach with their proposed approach. However, it is also necessary to conclude the cluster based approach in the introduction or related work section. That is, to conclude the existing approaches in solving the mentioned problems and their drawbacks.
[1] Enhanced weighted k-nearest neighbor algorithm for indoor wi-fi positioning systems
[2] Improving RSS-based indoor positioning algorithm via K-Means clustering.
[3] Improving Wi-Fi Indoor Positioning via AP Sets Similarity and Semi-Supervised Affinity Propagation Clustering
[4] A novel clustering-based approach of indoor location fingerprinting.
Author Response
Thanks for the reviewer's guiding suggestions.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
Thanks for the authors’ responses. Overall, I am satisfied with this revised version. Some motivations, ideas, method descriptions and experimental evaluations are explained clearly in this version. I think that this paper can be published.
Author Response
Thanks for the reviewer's guiding suggestions.
Reviewer 4 Report
There are still many typos and presentation issues in the paper:
- L.196: setps -> (steps)
- The texts in Figs. 11 and 12 are too small to see.
Author Response
Thanks for the reviewer's guiding suggestions.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx