Next Article in Journal
Adaptive Fixed-Threshold Event-Triggered Prescribed Performance Control of Nonlinear Systems with Unknown Initial Tracking Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study on the Impact of Aging Trajectories on High-Nickel Ternary NCA Lithium-Ion Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Flexible and Compact UWB MIMO Antenna with Dual-Band-Notched Double U-Shaped Slot on Mylar® Polyester Film
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Compact Fractal-Based Super-Wideband mmWave MIMO Antenna for 5G NR and 6G Services

by
Haleh Jahanbakhsh Basherlou
*,
Naser Ojaroudi Parchin
* and
Chan Hwang See
School of Computing, Engineering and the Built Environment, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2026, 15(12), 2564; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15122564
Submission received: 27 April 2026 / Revised: 5 June 2026 / Accepted: 6 June 2026 / Published: 10 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Collection MIMO Antennas)

Abstract

This paper presents a compact fractal-based super-wideband multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) antenna for millimeter-wave (mmWave) 5G new radio (NR) and prospective 6G applications. The MIMO system comprises four Koch fractal monopole elements integrated with a modified shared ground plane. By adopting the second Koch iteration, the antenna achieves enhanced impedance bandwidth and stable radiation behavior compared with lower-order iterations. The elements are arranged in a polarization-diversity configuration within a 30 × 30 mm2 footprint on a 0.8 mm-thick Rogers RO4835 substrate (εr = 3.5, δ = 0.0025). The proposed design provides an impedance bandwidth exceeding 14 GHz over 26.5–41 GHz, covering key bands at 28, 32, 38, and 40 GHz, while maintaining high inter-element isolation (around 30 dB over the operating range). The optimized ground modification enables a fully connected common ground and suppresses mutual coupling without additional decoupling structures. The antenna achieves 4–6 dBi realized gain with radiation efficiency exceeding 95%. MIMO performance metrics, including the envelope correlation coefficient (ECC), mean effective gain (MEG), and diversity gain (DG), confirm excellent diversity characteristics. The antenna is further evaluated under bending, demonstrating stable matching and isolation for conformal and wearable scenarios, and the concept is extendable to a non-planar 12-port configuration within the same footprint. Measured results agree well with simulations, validating the proposed design for wideband mmWave 5G/6G devices.

1. Introduction

The rapid evolution of wireless communication systems toward fifth generation (5G) and beyond-5G/sixth generation (6G) technologies has imposed stringent requirements on antenna systems, including ultra-high data rates, low latency, enhanced reliability, and massive connectivity [1,2]. To satisfy these demands, millimeter-wave (mmWave) frequency bands have emerged as a cornerstone of modern wireless communications due to the availability of wide contiguous bandwidths, particularly in the 26–40 GHz spectrum allocated for 5G New Radio (NR) and prospective 6G services [3,4]. Despite these advantages, mmWave systems inherently suffer from high free-space path loss, increased atmospheric attenuation, and strong sensitivity to blockage, thereby necessitating advanced antenna solutions capable of delivering high efficiency, wide bandwidth, and robust diversity performance within compact platforms [5]. Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) technology has been widely adopted to mitigate these challenges by exploiting spatial, pattern, and polarization diversity to enhance channel capacity and link reliability [6]. In mmWave systems, compact MIMO antennas are especially critical for user equipment, wearable devices, and small-cell base stations, where limited physical space and stringent integration constraints prevail [7]. However, the realization of compact mmWave MIMO antennas remains challenging due to strong mutual coupling between closely spaced antenna elements, the inherently narrow impedance bandwidth of conventional antenna geometries, and the increased design complexity introduced by isolation-enhancement techniques [8,9,10]. Among different isolation-enhancement approaches, defected ground structure (DGS)-based techniques have been widely used to improve impedance matching and reduce mutual coupling by disturbing unwanted surface-current paths in the ground plane [11]. However, DGS approaches usually require careful optimization of defect dimensions and positions, and excessive ground perturbation may increase design complexity or affect radiation stability, especially in compact mmWave and flexible platforms. In contrast, the proposed design improves isolation using a connected modified shared ground plane while preserving a continuous common-ground structure, which is more suitable for practical integration and scalable MIMO implementation.
Previous studies have reported a wide variety of mmWave MIMO antenna designs employing different radiator types and design strategies to address the stringent requirements of 5G and emerging 6G systems. Patch-based and slotted-patch MIMO antennas, such as those presented in [12,13,14,15,16], are among the most commonly reported solutions due to their planar structure, ease of fabrication, and moderate-to-high gain characteristics. These designs typically employ polarization diversity, defected ground structures, or metasurface loading to enhance isolation and radiation performance. However, they are often limited to narrow or dual-band operation—typically around 28 GHz and 38 GHz—and may require relatively large physical dimensions, multilayer configurations, or complex ground-plane modifications. Such design choices increase fabrication complexity and may introduce additional losses at higher mmWave frequencies. Monopole-based and slot-based MIMO antennas, including those reported in [17,18,19,20,21], offer more compact implementations with simpler geometries and lower fabrication cost. These antennas generally achieve acceptable isolation, robust radiation response, and in some cases very low envelope correlation coefficients. Nevertheless, most of these designs are restricted to dual-band or narrow wideband operation and commonly support only two antenna ports. As a result, their applicability to high-capacity mmWave MIMO systems requiring wider bandwidths and higher-order MIMO configurations remains limited. To extend the operating bandwidth, several studies have proposed wideband or multi-band mmWave MIMO antennas using modified patch geometries, curved or arc-shaped radiators, defected ground planes, or hybrid radiator configurations [22,23,24]. While these approaches demonstrate improved impedance bandwidth and isolation performance, they often rely on additional decoupling structures, large inter-element spacing, multilayer substrates, or complex feeding networks. These requirements increase structural complexity, enlarge the antenna footprint, and restrict scalability to higher-order MIMO arrays. Moreover, maintaining consistent radiation performance and high efficiency across a wide mmWave band remains challenging for many of these designs. High-gain array-based solutions, such as those reported in [25,26], effectively enhance radiation performance and help mitigate the severe path loss encountered at mmWave frequencies. These antennas are well suited for base stations and fixed wireless access systems; however, they are generally optimized for rigid platforms and large form factors. Consequently, their suitability for compact user equipment, wearable devices, or conformal platforms is limited. Furthermore, although many reported designs demonstrate favorable MIMO performance metrics, such as low envelope correlation coefficients and high diversity gain, only a small number of studies investigate mechanical flexibility or scalability to higher-order MIMO configurations while preserving wideband operation, high isolation, and compact size. Overall, the existing literature highlights persistent trade-offs among bandwidth, compactness, isolation, efficiency, and implementation complexity in mmWave MIMO antenna design. In particular, there remains a lack of comprehensive antenna solutions that simultaneously achieve super-wideband mmWave operation, small-area configuration, high isolation without complex decoupling structures, mechanical flexibility, and scalability to dense MIMO configurations.
To address these challenges, this paper proposes a compact fractal-based super-wideband mmWave MIMO antenna employing Koch fractal monopole elements integrated with a modified shared ground plane. Fractal antenna geometries have attracted significant attention for antenna miniaturization and bandwidth enhancement due to their self-similar and space-filling characteristics [27]. Among various fractal geometries, the Koch fractal has demonstrated promising performance in monopole and slot antenna configurations by enabling longer effective current paths and multiple resonant modes within a compact physical area [28]. However, most reported fractal-based designs are limited to single-element antennas or narrow operating bandwidths and are not readily extendable to multiport MIMO systems. Moreover, the combined use of higher-order fractal iterations with shared-ground-plane engineering to realize super-wideband operation and high isolation in compact mmWave MIMO configurations remains largely unexplored. These gaps motivate the proposed design, which simultaneously addresses compactness, bandwidth, efficiency, isolation, flexibility, and scalability within a single, practical antenna architecture [29].
It should be emphasized that the novelty of this work does not rely solely on the use of Koch fractal geometry, which has been previously explored for antenna miniaturization and bandwidth enhancement. Instead, the main contribution lies in the integration of a second-iteration Koch fractal monopole with a compact shared-ground MIMO configuration to simultaneously realize super-wideband mmWave operation, strong inter-element isolation, mechanical flexibility, and scalability within a single antenna platform. Unlike many existing fractal monopole antennas that mainly focus on single-element or limited-band operation, the proposed design achieves a wide 26.5–41 GHz impedance bandwidth within a compact 30 × 30 mm2 footprint while maintaining isolation better than −30 dB without additional decoupling structures. Therefore, the proposed geometry provides a practical advantage by combining bandwidth enhancement, compactness, isolation improvement, and MIMO scalability in one integrated design.
The proposed antenna consists of four identical fractal elements arranged in a polarization diversity configuration within a compact footprint of 30 × 30 mm2 and fabricated on a thin RO4835 substrate with low dielectric loss. The antenna design and parametric analysis were carried out using CST Microwave Studio [30]. By exploiting the second iteration of the Koch fractal geometry, the antenna achieves a significant enhancement in impedance bandwidth and radiation characteristics compared with lower-order iterations. Furthermore, an optimized ground-plane modification is introduced to realize a common connected ground structure while effectively suppressing mutual coupling between antenna elements to levels below −30 dB, without resorting to complex decoupling networks. The proposed design achieves a super-wide impedance bandwidth exceeding 14 GHz, covering the key mmWave frequency bands at 28, 32, 38, and 40 GHz. Comprehensive MIMO performance evaluation confirms excellent diversity performance suitable for practical MIMO systems. In addition, the mechanical flexibility of the antenna is systematically investigated under various bending conditions, demonstrating robust electromagnetic performance suitable for conformal and wearable applications [31]. The scalability of the concept is further demonstrated by extending the design to a non-planar 12-port antenna while preserving the same footprint. The main contributions of this work can be summarized as follows:
  • A compact mmWave MIMO antenna with super-wideband operation covering 26.5–41 GHz is proposed.
  • A second-iteration Koch fractal geometry combined with an optimized shared ground plane is employed to achieve high isolation without additional decoupling structures.
  • Excellent MIMO performance is demonstrated through simulation and measurement results.
  • Mechanical flexibility and scalability to higher-order MIMO configurations are demonstrated.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the Koch fractal element and its evolution. Section 3 presents the four-port MIMO configuration and the modified shared ground approach. Section 4 reports simulated and measured results, including impedance, isolation, radiation characteristics, and MIMO metrics. Section 5 provides a comparative discussion with recently reported mmWave MIMO antennas. Section 6 investigates flexibility and scalability to higher-order configurations. Finally, Section 7 concludes the paper.

2. Koch Fractal Antenna Element

The suggested antenna element is based on the Koch fractal geometry, which is employed to enhance the impedance bandwidth and radiation characteristics while maintaining a compact physical size. Koch fractal structures have been widely used in antenna engineering due to their self-similar and space-filling properties, which increase the effective electrical length of the radiator without significantly enlarging its physical dimensions [27,28]. The Koch fractal is generated through an iterative process starting from a simple equilateral triangular geometry, as illustrated in Figure 1a–d. In the initial stage, a conventional triangular radiator with side length g is considered. For each subsequent iteration, the middle third of every line segment is replaced by two segments forming an outward equilateral triangular protrusion. This recursive process increases the effective electrical length of the radiator without enlarging its overall footprint, enabling the excitation of multiple resonant modes within a compact structure.
The evolution of the monopole antenna element based on the Koch fractal geometry is shown in Figure 2. In the basic configuration, the antenna consists of a triangular monopole fed by a microstrip line, which exhibits limited impedance bandwidth and supports only a small number of resonant modes in the mmWave frequency range. By introducing the first fractal iteration along the edges of the radiator, the effective current path length is increased, resulting in improved impedance matching and the appearance of additional resonances. Further application of the Koch perturbations in the second iteration significantly enhances the wideband behavior of the antenna by generating multiple closely spaced resonant modes, which merge to form a continuous super-wide impedance bandwidth. The simulated reflection coefficient (S11) corresponding to the different fractal iterations is presented in Figure 3.
It is observed that the basic and first-iteration geometries exhibit narrowband characteristics with limited impedance matching over the mmWave spectrum. In contrast, the second-iteration Koch fractal antenna demonstrates a substantial improvement in impedance bandwidth, achieving wideband operation across the 26.5–41 GHz range. Although the third iteration increases the geometrical complexity and electrical length, marginal bandwidth reduction is obtained, accompanied by irregular impedance behavior and increased sensitivity to fabrication tolerances at mmWave frequencies. Therefore, the second iteration provides the best trade-off between bandwidth enhancement, radiation stability, and manufacturability [32,33].
To further clarify the bandwidth enhancement mechanism, the surface current distributions of the first three antenna configurations at the second resonance of 38 GHz are compared in Figure 4, including the basic geometry (Design 1), first iteration (Design 2), and second iteration (Design 3). For Design 1, the current is mainly concentrated around the feed transition and lower radiator edges, while the upper radiator region is weakly excited, indicating that the basic triangular monopole does not effectively support the upper-band resonance. In Design 2, the first Koch perturbation increases the effective electrical length and introduces additional current paths along the modified edges; however, the current distribution remains relatively limited. In contrast, Design 3 exhibits stronger and more distributed current concentrations along the fractal edges, lower slots, and feed transition region. This confirms that the second Koch iteration enhances the excitation of the upper-band resonant mode around 38 GHz. The strengthened second resonance, together with the lower resonant mode, improves impedance matching over a wider frequency range and explains the bandwidth enhancement observed in Figure 3.
The bandwidth enhancement can therefore be interpreted using a current-path-based explanation. In the basic triangular monopole, the resonant behavior is mainly governed by a relatively simple current path along the radiator, resulting in limited impedance bandwidth. With the introduction of Koch perturbations, the effective electrical length increases and additional current paths are created along the fractal edges. In the second iteration, the self-similar geometry provides multiple current paths with different effective electrical lengths, which excite adjacent resonant modes across the mmWave band. The overlap of these resonant modes contributes to the observed super-wideband response and provides an effective balance between resonant-mode generation, wideband impedance matching, and fabrication practicality. The surface current density distributions of the optimized second-iteration Koch fractal antenna element at 30 GHz and 38 GHz are illustrated in Figure 5a and Figure 5b, respectively. At 30 GHz, strong current concentrations are observed along the lower edges of the fractal radiator and around the junction between the feed line and the radiating element, indicating that the lower resonant mode is primarily governed by the overall electrical length of the monopole structure. At 38 GHz, the surface current distribution becomes more localized and pronounced along the higher-order fractal edges and fine geometric features of the radiator, demonstrating the excitation of the upper-band resonant mode associated with the self-similar Koch segments. The coexistence of current paths with different effective electrical lengths enables multiple resonances to be excited within the mmWave band, which collectively contributes to the super-wideband characteristics [34,35].
Figure 6 presents the simulated total efficiency of the antenna elements corresponding to the different fractal iterations shown in Figure 2. The basic geometry (Design 1) exhibits high efficiency across most of the operating band due to its simple structure; however, its limited impedance bandwidth restricts its applicability for wideband mmWave operation. The first fractal iteration (Design 2) shows noticeable improvement in bandwidth, but at the cost of reduced radiation efficiency at the lower end of the band, primarily due to impedance mismatch and increased surface current confinement. A significant enhancement in efficiency is observed for the second-iteration Koch fractal antenna (Design 3), which maintains high total efficiency exceeding 90% across the majority of the 26.5–41 GHz band. This improvement is attributed to the optimized balance between increased electrical length and controlled geometrical complexity, which enables efficient excitation of multiple resonant modes while minimizing conductor and dielectric losses. In contrast, the third iteration (Design 4) exhibits a slight degradation in efficiency at higher frequencies, particularly beyond 38 GHz, due to excessive fractal perturbations that introduce additional losses and increase sensitivity to fabrication tolerances at mmWave frequencies. These results further confirm that the second-iteration Koch fractal geometry provides the most favorable trade-off between wideband impedance matching, efficiency, and manufacturability.
Figure 7 shows the three-dimensional radiation patterns of the proposed antenna element at 30 GHz and 38 GHz. At both frequencies, the antenna exhibits well-maintained radiation performance with nearly omnidirectional coverage, which is suitable for mmWave applications requiring wide angular coverage. The radiation patterns remain almost consistent across the operating band, with no significant pattern distortion or deep nulls observed. These results confirm that the antenna maintains reliable radiation performance and is well suited for integration into compact MIMO systems [36,37].

3. MIMO Fractal Antenna Array

The optimized second-iteration Koch fractal antenna element is used to realize a four-port mmWave MIMO antenna array, as shown in Figure 8. The antenna elements are arranged in a symmetric configuration to achieve polarization diversity within a compact footprint.
Each element is independently fed, enabling efficient multiport operation for MIMO applications. Figure 8a illustrates the MIMO configuration without ground-plane modification, where higher mutual coupling exists between adjacent elements. To improve this, a modified shared ground plane is introduced in the final design, as shown in Figure 8b. The design parameter values are listed in Table 1. The proposed ground-plane modification effectively suppresses surface current coupling while maintaining a fully connected ground structure, which is desirable for practical fabrication. The simulated S-parameters of both configurations are presented in Figure 9. The reflection coefficient (S11) confirms wideband impedance matching across the operating band of 26.5–41 GHz. In addition, the modified ground plane improves isolation, with the mutual coupling coefficients reduced to below −30 dB over most of the mmWave frequency range [4,38].
To clarify the role of the connected modified shared ground plane in mutual coupling suppression, Figure 10 compares the surface current distributions of the MIMO antenna with and without the connected ground when Port 1 is excited. In the configuration without the connected ground, noticeable induced currents are observed on the neighboring elements and their feeding regions, indicating stronger inter-element interaction. After connecting the ground sections through the proposed modified ground plane, the current distribution becomes more controlled, and the induced currents on the adjacent elements are reduced at both 28 GHz and 38 GHz. This confirms that the connected shared ground redistributes the surface current and suppresses the dominant coupling paths between ports. The improvement is also consistent with the S-parameter comparison in Figure 9, where the isolation is improved to around −30 dB over most of the operating band. Figure 11 illustrates the three-dimensional radiation patterns of the proposed four-port MIMO antenna elements at 28 GHz and 38 GHz. At both frequencies, all antenna elements exhibit stable radiation characteristics with similar pattern shapes and nearly omnidirectional coverage, indicating good pattern diversity among the ports. The radiation behavior remains consistent across the operating band, with no significant pattern distortion observed between different elements. This uniform radiation performance confirms that the proposed MIMO configuration preserves the radiation characteristics of individual elements while supporting effective multiport operation [39].
Figure 12 illustrates the efficiency and gain characteristics of a single MIMO antenna element across the operating frequency range. As shown in Figure 12a, the antenna achieves high radiation efficiency, remaining above 95% over most of the band, while the total efficiency exceeds 90%, indicating minimal dielectric and conductor losses despite the compact fractal geometry. The small deviation between radiation and total efficiency confirms good impedance matching across the operating frequencies. Figure 12b shows that the realized gain varies between 4 and 6 dBi, with peak values observed around the lower and upper portions of the mmWave band. These results demonstrate that the proposed antenna element maintains stable efficiency and gain performance, making it well suited for compact mmWave multiport systems [40].

4. Prototyping and Result Validation

To validate the proposed design, a prototype of the four-port Koch fractal mmWave MIMO antenna was fabricated on a 0.8 mm-thick RO4835 substrate using standard PCB etching techniques. Figure 13 shows the fabricated antenna, where Figure 13a illustrates the top layer containing the Koch fractal radiating elements and microstrip feed lines, while Figure 13b presents the bottom layer with the modified shared ground plane. The fabricated prototype closely follows the optimized design dimensions, confirming the feasibility of realizing the proposed fractal geometry and ground-plane structure using conventional manufacturing processes. The feeding method is illustrated in Figure 13c, where a mmWave-compatible end-launch connector is used for each element.
Figure 14 compares the measured and simulated S-parameter results of the proposed MIMO antenna. As shown, a good agreement is observed between measurements and simulations across the operating band of 26.5–41 GHz. The measured reflection coefficient (S11) confirms wideband impedance matching, while the transmission coefficient (S21) remains below −30 dB over most of the mmWave band, validating the low mutual coupling achieved by the modified shared ground plane. Minor discrepancies between measured and simulated results can be attributed to fabrication tolerances, connector effects, and measurement uncertainties at mmWave. Figure 15 presents the measured and simulated envelope correlation coefficient (ECC) of the proposed MIMO antenna. The ECC values remain extremely low across the operating band, well below the acceptable threshold for practical MIMO systems, indicating excellent diversity performance [41,42]. The close agreement between measured and simulated ECC results further confirms the reliability of the proposed design and its suitability for high-performance mmWave MIMO applications.
Figure 16 shows the measured and simulated diversity gain (DG) of the proposed MIMO antenna across the operating frequency range. The diversity gain remains close to the ideal value of 10 dB throughout the band, indicating excellent diversity performance [43]. A strong agreement between measured and simulated results is observed, with only minor deviations at higher frequencies due to measurement uncertainties. Figure 17 presents the measured and simulated two-dimensional radiation patterns of Antenna 1 in the E-plane and H-plane at 28 GHz and 38 GHz. A good agreement between the measured and simulated results is observed at both frequencies, confirming the accuracy of the proposed antenna design. The radiation patterns exhibit stable and nearly omnidirectional characteristics, particularly in the H-plane, with no deep nulls across the main coverage region. Minor discrepancies between measured and simulated patterns are mainly attributed to fabrication tolerances, connector effects, and measurement uncertainties at mmWave frequencies [6]. Overall, the results demonstrate that the proposed antenna maintains consistent radiation behavior across the operating band, supporting its suitability for practical mmWave MIMO applications [44].
Table 2 compares the simulated and measured gain and efficiency of Antenna 1 at 28 GHz and 38 GHz, which are the same frequencies used for the measured radiation-pattern validation in Figure 17. The gain and efficiency measurements were performed under the same calibrated mmWave measurement environment used for radiation-pattern characterization. The measured gain values of 5.6 dBi and 4.4 dBi are in good agreement with the simulated values of 5.8 dBi and 4.5 dBi, respectively. Similarly, the measured efficiencies remain above 90% at both frequencies, confirming the high radiation performance of the fabricated prototype. The small deviations between measured and simulated results are mainly attributed to fabrication tolerances, connector losses, chamber calibration uncertainty, and measurement setup limitations at mmWave frequencies.

5. Comparison

Table 3 compares the proposed antenna with recently reported mmWave MIMO antenna designs [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. As summarized, the proposed antenna offers several distinct advantages over recently reported works in terms of bandwidth, compactness, efficiency, and isolation performance. Many existing designs employ patch-based or slot-based radiators and achieve acceptable radiation characteristics; however, their operating bandwidth is often limited or obtained at the expense of increased physical size, complex multilayer structures, or additional decoupling networks. In contrast, the proposed fractal-based MIMO antenna achieves a super-wide impedance bandwidth of 26.5–41 GHz (14.5 GHz) within a compact footprint of 30 × 30 mm2 while supporting four antenna ports. Moreover, the proposed design exhibits high radiation efficiency of up to 97% and strong inter-element isolation better than −30 dB across the operating band, without the need for complex isolation-enhancement techniques. Compared with wideband or array-based solutions that require significantly larger dimensions or exhibit reduced efficiency, the proposed antenna provides a more balanced trade-off between size, bandwidth, and performance. Furthermore, unlike most of the reported designs, the proposed antenna explicitly addresses mechanical flexibility and scalability. The antenna maintains stable impedance matching, isolation, and radiation characteristics under various bending conditions and can be extended to higher-order MIMO configurations while preserving the same compact footprint. These features, combined with its wide bandwidth, high efficiency, and compact size, indicate that the proposed design provides a more balanced and practical trade-off among performance, complexity, and integration requirements compared with existing mmWave MIMO antennas, making it a strong candidate for compact, conformal, and future 5G/6G wireless applications.

6. Flexibility and Scalability Characteristics

In practical wireless devices, antennas are often subjected to mechanical deformation due to installation constraints, device curvature, or wearable and conformal applications. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate the electromagnetic performance of the proposed MIMO antenna under bending conditions [45]. In this section, the flexibility of the suggested fractal antenna array is investigated by analyzing its performance under different bending angles to assess the impact of mechanical deformation on impedance matching, mutual coupling, radiation and overall MIMO behavior. Figure 18 illustrates the bending configurations of the mmWave MIMO antenna for the selected deformation angles of 15°, 30°, and 45°. The antenna is bent along the longitudinal axis while preserving the original feeding and ground-plane structure. As shown in Figure 19, for all bending cases, S11 remains below −10 dB over the 26.5–41 GHz operating band, corresponding to an impedance bandwidth of 14.5 GHz. In addition, the mutual coupling parameters S21, S31, and S41 remain low across most of the band. As the bending angle increases, a slight variation in inter-element coupling is observed, with coupling levels changing from approximately −30 dB to −20 dB. This behavior is primarily attributed to the modification of surface current distributions and the reduced effective spacing between antenna elements caused by mechanical deformation.
Nevertheless, the observed coupling levels remain within acceptable limits. These results confirm that the antenna maintains stable wideband performance, enhanced inter-element isolation, and robust MIMO characteristics under mechanical deformation, demonstrating its suitability for flexible and conformal applications. The stable bending performance can be attributed to the distributed current behavior of the Koch fractal radiator and the symmetric connected shared-ground configuration. The second-order Koch geometry provides multiple current paths along the fractal edges, reducing excessive dependence on a single dominant current path. Therefore, moderate mechanical deformation does not significantly disturb the overall resonant behavior. In addition, the connected shared ground plane helps maintain a continuous RF reference plane and controls current redistribution among the antenna elements under bending. Compared with flexible MIMO antennas that rely on isolated ground sections or additional decoupling structures, the proposed configuration offers improved structural continuity and more stable inter-element isolation under conformal deformation. Figure 20 shows the three-dimensional radiation patterns of the proposed MIMO antenna under bending angles of 15°, 30°, and 45° at 28 GHz and 38 GHz. The radiation characteristics remain stable for all bending configurations, with only minor variations in pattern shape and directivity as the bending angle increases. No significant pattern distortion or deep nulls are observed at either frequency [31].
To demonstrate the scalability of the proposed fractal-based mmWave MIMO antenna, the design is extended from the original four-element configuration to eight-element and twelve-element MIMO arrangements, as illustrated in Figure 21. The antenna elements are arranged in orthogonal and stacked configurations while preserving the same element geometry, feeding mechanism, and shared ground-plane concept. This approach allows the number of antenna ports to be increased without modifying the individual radiator design or increasing the overall footprint significantly, highlighting the modular nature of the proposed antenna concept.
The simulated S-parameter results for the eight-element and twelve-element MIMO configurations are presented in Figure 22. For both configurations, the input reflection coefficient (S11) remains below −10 dB over the 26.5–41 GHz operating band, confirming that wideband impedance matching is maintained as the number of antenna elements increases. In addition, the mutual coupling parameters between adjacent and non-adjacent elements remain low, generally below −17 dB and reaching values better than −30 dB across most of the band. Although a slight increase in coupling is observed as the number of elements increases, particularly in the twelve-element configuration, the isolation levels remain within acceptable limits for high-order MIMO systems [46].
Figure 23 illustrates the three-dimensional radiation patterns of the proposed eight-element and twelve-element MIMO antenna configurations at 28 GHz, 33 GHz, and 38 GHz. For both configurations, the radiation patterns remain stable with broad angular coverage, indicating that the fundamental radiation characteristics of the individual antenna elements are preserved as the array size increases. A slight increase in pattern directivity and lobe density is observed in the twelve-element configuration, which is attributed to the higher number of radiating elements and their closer proximity. Despite the increased array complexity, no significant pattern distortion or deep nulls are observed across the operating band [47]. The radiation behavior remains well distributed, confirming that the proposed antenna architecture maintains consistent radiation performance when scaled to higher-order MIMO configurations.
Figure 24 compares the total efficiency and maximum realized gain of the proposed MIMO antenna for four-, eight-, and twelve-element configurations. As shown in Figure 24a, all configurations maintain high total efficiency across the operating band, with values exceeding 90% over most of the 26–41 GHz range. A slight reduction in efficiency is observed as the number of elements increases, which is mainly attributed to increased inter-element interactions and conductor losses in denser MIMO arrangements; however, the efficiency remains within acceptable limits for practical mmWave systems. Figure 24b shows the maximum realized gain for different array sizes. As expected, the realized gain increases with the number of antenna elements, with the twelve-element configuration achieving the highest gain across the band, followed by the eight-element and four-element designs. This gain enhancement confirms the effectiveness of the scalable architecture in supporting higher-order configurations while preserving wideband operation and high efficiency [48].
It should be noted that the flexibility and scalability investigations are performed numerically as proof-of-concept studies to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed antenna architecture under conformal deformation and higher-order MIMO extension. The fabricated four-port prototype experimentally validates the main antenna design, while the bending and 8-/12-element configurations numerically demonstrate that the proposed concept can maintain acceptable impedance matching, isolation, and radiation characteristics under extended operating scenarios. Fabrication and calibrated mmWave measurement of bent prototypes and higher-order non-planar configurations require additional dedicated prototypes and experimental setup time; therefore, experimental validation of these extended configurations will be considered in future work. From a practical integration perspective, the compact 30 × 30 mm2 footprint and connected shared-ground configuration make the proposed antenna suitable for integration into compact mmWave user equipment, conformal devices, and future 5G/6G wireless platforms. The shared-ground structure provides a continuous RF reference plane, which is beneficial for integration with RF front-end circuits and multiport feeding networks. However, practical implementation may be affected by packaging materials, device housing, nearby electronic components, and user-body proximity, particularly in wearable or handheld scenarios. Therefore, additional co-design with the device platform, packaging environment, and beamforming circuitry may be required for final product-level deployment. The scalable 8- and 12-element configurations also indicate the potential compatibility of the proposed architecture with beam-steering, beam allocation, and high-capacity MIMO systems, where advanced beam and power allocation techniques can further improve mmWave network performance [49].

7. Conclusions

This paper presented a compact fractal-based super-wideband mmWave MIMO antenna for 5G and emerging 6G applications. The proposed design employs second-iteration Koch fractal monopole elements with a modified shared ground plane to achieve wideband operation, low mutual coupling, and compact size. The four-element MIMO antenna occupies a footprint of 30 × 30 mm2 on a 0.8 mm-thick RO4835 substrate. The antenna achieves an impedance bandwidth of 26.5–41 GHz (14.5 GHz), with S11 remaining below −10 dB across the band. Low mutual coupling is achieved, with coupling better than −30 dB in the planar configuration and remaining below −20 dB under bending conditions. The antenna exhibits consistent radiation behavior, achieving a realized gain of 4–6 dBi for a single element and radiation efficiency exceeding 90%. Favorable MIMO performance is demonstrated, with the envelope correlation coefficient remaining below 3 × 10−3 and diversity gain close to 10 dB. The antenna maintains robust performance under bending angles of 15°, 30°, and 45°, confirming its suitability for flexible and conformal applications. In addition, the design is scalable to eight- and twelve-element MIMO configurations, achieving a maximum realized gain of approximately 8 dBi while maintaining total efficiency above 85%. Overall, the antenna offers a compact, wideband, and scalable solution with strong MIMO characteristics, making it well suited for practical mmWave 5G and future 6G wireless systems. Future work will focus on experimental validation of bent prototypes and higher-order non-planar MIMO configurations under realistic device-integration conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.J.B., N.O.P. and C.H.S.; Methodology, H.J.B.; Software, H.J.B. and C.H.S.; Validation, H.J.B., N.O.P. and C.H.S.; Investigation, H.J.B. and N.O.P.; Writing—original draft, H.J.B.; Writing—review and editing, N.O.P. and C.H.S.; Supervision, N.O.P. and C.H.S.; Project administration, N.O.P. and C.H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Osseiran, A.; Boccardi, F.; Braun, V.; Kusume, K.; Marsch, P.; Maternia, M.; Queseth, O.; Schellmann, M.; Schotten, H.; Taoka, H.; et al. Scenarios for 5G mobile and wireless communications: The vision of the METIS project. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2014, 52, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Saad, W.; Bennis, M.; Chen, M. A Vision of 6G Wireless Systems: Applications Trends Technologies and Open Research Problems. IEEE Netw. 2020, 34, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pi, Z.; Khan, F. An introduction to millimeter-wave mobile broadband systems. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2011, 49, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Elfergani, I.; Hussaini, A.S.; Abdalla, A.M.; Rodriguez, J.; Abd-Alhameed, R. Millimeter Wave Antenna Design for 5G Applications. In Optical and Wireless Convergence for 5G Networks; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 139–156. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jensen, M.; Wallace, J. A review of antennas and propagation for MIMO wireless communications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2004, 52, 2810–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Luo, F.-L.; Zhang, C. Massive MIMO for 5G: Theory, Implementation and Prototyping. In Signal Processing for 5G: Algorithms and Implementations; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 189–230. [Google Scholar]
  7. Al-Yasir, Y.; Abdulkhaleq, A.M.; Parchin, N.O.; Elfergani, I.T.; Rodriguez, J.; Noras, J.M.; Abd-Alhameed, R.A.; Rayit, A.; Qahwaji, R. Green and Highly Efficient MIMO Transceiver System for 5G Heterogenous Networks. IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw. 2022, 6, 500–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, X.; Soh, P.J.; Sharawi, M.S. MIMO Antenna Fundamentals and Characterization Methods. In MIMO Antenna Systems for 5G and Beyond; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2025; pp. 13–40. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Huang, L.; Jing, Y.; Georgakopoulos, A.; Demestichas, P. 5G mobile: Spectrum broadening to higher-frequency bands to support high data rates. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2014, 9, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, H.-C.; Wu, J.; Cui, S. Maximally PCB-Space-Saving Hybrid Integration of Millimeter-Wave and Microwave Antennas for 5G and B5G Smartphones. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 22812–22819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, S.; Kong, F.; Li, K.; Du, L. A planar triple-band monopole antenna loaded with an arc-shaped defected ground plane for WLAN/WiMAX applications. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2021, 13, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khalid, M.; Iffat Naqvi, S.; Hussain, N.; Rahman, M.; Fawad; Mirjavadi, S.S.; Khan, M.J.; Amin, Y. 4-Port MIMO Antenna with Defected Ground Structure for 5G Millimeter Wave Applications. Electronics 2020, 9, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Al Abbas, E.; Ikram, M.; Mobashsher, A.T.; Abbosh, A. MIMO Antenna System for Multi-Band Millimeter-Wave 5G and Wideband 4G Mobile Communications. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 181916–181923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marzouk, H.M.; Ahmed, M.I.; Shaalan, A.E.H. Novel Dual-Band 28/38 GHz MIMO Antennas for 5G Mobile Applications. Prog. Electromagn. Res. C 2019, 93, 103–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ramanathan, S.; Maria, A.B. A Compact Four-Element MIMO Antenna for 5 G Millimeter-Wave (37–39 GHz) Applications. J. Infrared Milli Terahz Waves 2024, 45, 604–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alibakhshikenari, M.; Din, I.U.; Ali, E.M.; Elmunim, N.A.; Virdee, B.S.; Mariyanayagam, D.; Ullah, S.; Abbasi, N.A.; Rashid, N.; See, C.H.; et al. Metasurface covered millimeter-wave MIMO antenna array. In Waves in Random and Complex Media; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2025; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kamal, M.M.; Yang, S.; Ren, X.C.; Altaf, A.; Kiani, S.H.; Anjum, M.R.; Iqbal, A.; Asif, M.; Saeed, S.I. Infinity Shell Shaped MIMO Antenna Array for mm-Wave 5G Applications. Electronics 2021, 10, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ali, W.; Das, S.; Medkour, H.; Lakrit, S. Planar dual-band 27/39 GHz millimeter-wave MIMO antenna for 5G applications. Microsyst. Technol. 2021, 27, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Megahed, A.A.; Abdelhay, E.H.; Abdelazim, M.; Soliman, H.Y.M. 5G millimeter wave wideband MIMO antenna arrays with high isolation. J. Wirel. Com. Netw. 2023, 2023, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Marzouk, H.M.; Ahmed, M.I.; Shaalan, A.A. A novel dual-band 28/38 GHz AFSL MIMO antenna for 5G smartphone applications. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1447, 012025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nasralla, M.M. A multi-band broad bandwidth inverted-C & F-shaped MIMO antenna for enhanced wireless connectivity. Results Eng. 2025, 28, 107855. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sehrai, D.A.; Abdullah, M.; Altaf, A.; Kiani, S.H.; Muhammad, F.; Tufail, M.; Irfan, M.; Glowacz, A.; Rahman, S. A Novel High Gain Wideband MIMO Antenna for 5G Millimeter Wave Applications. Electronics 2020, 9, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sehrai, D.A.; Asif, M.; Shoaib, N.; Ibrar, M.; Jan, S.; Alibakhshikenari, M.; Lalbakhsh, A.; Limiti, E. Compact Quad-Element High-Isolation Wideband MIMO Antenna for mm-Wave Applications. Electronics 2021, 10, 1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sethumadhavi, R.; Mishra, B.; Singh, A.K.; Yadav, D.; Eduru, S.; Satheesha, T.Y. Dual and wideband mmWave 28/38 GHz quad port MIMO antenna for 5G and beyond applications. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 44195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tahseen, H.U.; Zheng, Z.; Yang, L. A single substrate 38 GHz dual antenna array with compact feed network. IEEJ Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2021, 16, 1203–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alibakhshikenari, M.; Ali, E.M.; Din, I.U.; Virdee, B.S.; Ullah, S.; Khan, S.; See, C.H.; Saber, T.; Limiti, E. Millimeter-Wave MIMO Array with Low Interactions Between its Antenna Elements for Fifth Generation Wireless Communication Networks. J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves 2025, 46, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Werner, D.H.; Ganguly, S. An overview of fractal antenna engineering research. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2003, 45, 38–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Krzysztofik, W.J. Fractal geometry in electromagnetics applications from antenna to metamaterials. Microw. Rev. 2013, 19, 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  29. Shet, K.; Karthikeya, G.S.; Suraj, H.S. A wideband probe-fed low-cost mm-wave fractal antenna array for 5G. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1706, 012094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. CST. Microwave Studio, ver. 2025; CST: Boston, MA, USA, 2025.
  31. Kirtania, S.G.; Elger, A.W.; Hasan, M.R.; Wisniewska, A.; Sekhar, K.; Karacolak, T.; Sekhar, P.K. Flexible Antennas: A Review. Micromachines 2020, 11, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Karmakar, A. Fractal antennas and arrays: A review and recent developments. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2021, 13, 173–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ojaroudiparchin, N.; Shen, M.; Pedersen, G.F. A Compact Design of Planar Array Antenna with Fractal Elements for Future Generation Applications. Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. J. 2016, 31, 789–796. [Google Scholar]
  34. Parchin, N.O.; Mohamed, H.G.; Moussa, K.H.; See, C.H.; Abd-Alhameed, R.A.; Alwadai, N.M.; Amar, A.S. An efficient antenna system with improved radiation for multi-standard/multi-mode 5G cellular communications. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 4179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Khaleel, S.A.; Hamad, E.K.I.; Parchin, N.O.; Saleh, M.B. MTM-Inspired Graphene-Based THz MIMO Antenna Configurations Using Characteristic Mode Analysis for 6G/IoT Applications. Electronics 2022, 11, 2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Visser, H.J. PCB Antennas: Printed Monopoles. In Approximate Antenna Analysis for CAD; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 97–138. [Google Scholar]
  37. Dawson, J.L. Multiple Antennas in Wireless Links. In Energy Fundamentals of Radio; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2026; pp. 303–328. [Google Scholar]
  38. Parchin, N.O.; Zhang, J.; Abd-Alhameed, R.A.; Pedersen, G.F.; Zhang, S. A Planar Dual-Polarized Phased Array with Broad Bandwidth and Quasi-Endfire Radiation for 5G Mobile Handsets. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2021, 69, 6410–6419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, X.; Zhang, S.; Li, Q. A Review of Mutual Coupling in MIMO Systems. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 24706–24719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khan, S. Highly Compact Wideband High-Gain Four-Element MIMO Antenna for 5G New Radio IoT. IEEE Internet Things J. 2025, 12, 22350–22365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Parchin, N.O. (Ed.) Design, Analysis, and Measurement of Antennas; MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Stepanov, M.A.; Artyushenko, V.V.; Sokolov, V.S.; Podkopaev, A.A. MIMO Antenna Array With a Randomized Arrangement of Elements Providing Specified Directional Properties. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2025, 24, 3174–3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vaughan, R.G.; Andersen, J.B. Antenna diversity in mobile communication. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 1987, 36, 149–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ali, A.; Awan, M.N.; Malik, W.A.; Chaudhary, S.Y.; Hidayatullah; Haider, J. A Compact and High Gain X/Ku Band Shared Aperture Antenna Array With Enhanced Inter-Band and Cross-Band Isolation. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 146137–146146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Usmani, W.U.; Chietera, F.P.; Mescia, L. Flexible Phased Antenna Arrays: A Review. Sensors 2025, 25, 4690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dudek, A.; Kanios, P.; Staszek, K.; Gruszczynski, S.; Wincza, K. Scalable Antenna Arrays Featuring Stable Radiation Pattern in Multioctave Bandwidth. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2023, 71, 1478–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Deng, C.; Feng, Z.; Iskander, M.F. 2-D Planar Scalable Dual-Polarized Series-Fed Slot Antenna Array Using Single Substrate. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2014, 62, 2280–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Visser, H.J. Antenna Theory and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  49. Cao, Y.; Ohtsuki, T.; Maghsudi, S.; Quek, T.Q.S. Deep Learning and Image Super-Resolution-Guided Beam and Power Allocation for mmWave Networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2023, 72, 15080–15085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Koch snowflake geometry in its different iteration stages, (a) basic geometry, (b) first iteration, (c) second iteration, and (d) third iteration.
Figure 1. Koch snowflake geometry in its different iteration stages, (a) basic geometry, (b) first iteration, (c) second iteration, and (d) third iteration.
Electronics 15 02564 g001
Figure 2. The proposed antenna configuration in its (a) basic geometry, (b) first iteration, (c) second iteration, and (d) third iteration.
Figure 2. The proposed antenna configuration in its (a) basic geometry, (b) first iteration, (c) second iteration, and (d) third iteration.
Electronics 15 02564 g002
Figure 3. S11 results of the antennas shown in Figure 2.
Figure 3. S11 results of the antennas shown in Figure 2.
Electronics 15 02564 g003
Figure 4. Surface current distributions for different fractal iterations at the second resonance of 38 GHz: (a) basic geometry (Design 1), (b) first iteration (Design 2), and (c) second iteration (Design 3).
Figure 4. Surface current distributions for different fractal iterations at the second resonance of 38 GHz: (a) basic geometry (Design 1), (b) first iteration (Design 2), and (c) second iteration (Design 3).
Electronics 15 02564 g004
Figure 5. Surface current densities at the frequencies of (a) 30 GHz and (b) 38 GHz.
Figure 5. Surface current densities at the frequencies of (a) 30 GHz and (b) 38 GHz.
Electronics 15 02564 g005
Figure 6. Total efficiency results of the antennas shown in Figure 2.
Figure 6. Total efficiency results of the antennas shown in Figure 2.
Electronics 15 02564 g006
Figure 7. Three-dimensional radiation patterns of the antenna at the frequencies of (a) 30 GHz and (b) 38 GHz.
Figure 7. Three-dimensional radiation patterns of the antenna at the frequencies of (a) 30 GHz and (b) 38 GHz.
Electronics 15 02564 g007
Figure 8. MIMO antenna schematics (a) without and (b) with a modified shared ground plane.
Figure 8. MIMO antenna schematics (a) without and (b) with a modified shared ground plane.
Electronics 15 02564 g008
Figure 9. S-parameters of the MIMO antenna (a) without and (b) with the modified ground plane.
Figure 9. S-parameters of the MIMO antenna (a) without and (b) with the modified ground plane.
Electronics 15 02564 g009
Figure 10. Surface current distributions when Port 1 is excited: (a) without the connected ground at 28 GHz, (b) with the connected ground at 28 GHz, (c) without the connected ground at 38 GHz, and (d) with the connected ground at 38 GHz.
Figure 10. Surface current distributions when Port 1 is excited: (a) without the connected ground at 28 GHz, (b) with the connected ground at 28 GHz, (c) without the connected ground at 38 GHz, and (d) with the connected ground at 38 GHz.
Electronics 15 02564 g010
Figure 11. Three-dimensional radiation patterns of the MIMO antenna elements at (a) 28 GHz and (b) 38 GHz.
Figure 11. Three-dimensional radiation patterns of the MIMO antenna elements at (a) 28 GHz and (b) 38 GHz.
Electronics 15 02564 g011
Figure 12. (a) Efficiencies and (b) Gain results of a MIMO element.
Figure 12. (a) Efficiencies and (b) Gain results of a MIMO element.
Electronics 15 02564 g012
Figure 13. (a) Top and (b) bottom layers, and (c) the feeding method of the fabricated MIMO antenna.
Figure 13. (a) Top and (b) bottom layers, and (c) the feeding method of the fabricated MIMO antenna.
Electronics 15 02564 g013
Figure 14. Measured and simulated S-parameter results.
Figure 14. Measured and simulated S-parameter results.
Electronics 15 02564 g014
Figure 15. Measured and simulated ECC results.
Figure 15. Measured and simulated ECC results.
Electronics 15 02564 g015
Figure 16. Measured and simulated diversity gain results.
Figure 16. Measured and simulated diversity gain results.
Electronics 15 02564 g016
Figure 17. Measured/simulated radiation (E/H-Planes) for Ant. 1 at (a) 28 GHz and (b) 38 GHz.
Figure 17. Measured/simulated radiation (E/H-Planes) for Ant. 1 at (a) 28 GHz and (b) 38 GHz.
Electronics 15 02564 g017aElectronics 15 02564 g017b
Figure 18. (a) Front and (b) side views of the antenna under various bending angles (from 15 to 45 degree).
Figure 18. (a) Front and (b) side views of the antenna under various bending angles (from 15 to 45 degree).
Electronics 15 02564 g018
Figure 19. S-parameters of the antenna with bending angles of (a) 15, (b) 30 and (c) 45 degrees.
Figure 19. S-parameters of the antenna with bending angles of (a) 15, (b) 30 and (c) 45 degrees.
Electronics 15 02564 g019aElectronics 15 02564 g019b
Figure 20. Radiation patterns of the design under bending angles of (a) 15, (b) 30 and (c) 45 degrees at 28/38 GHz.
Figure 20. Radiation patterns of the design under bending angles of (a) 15, (b) 30 and (c) 45 degrees at 28/38 GHz.
Electronics 15 02564 g020
Figure 21. Design scalability; (a) 4- (b) 8- and (c) 12-element MIMO antenna configurations.
Figure 21. Design scalability; (a) 4- (b) 8- and (c) 12-element MIMO antenna configurations.
Electronics 15 02564 g021
Figure 22. S-parameter results of the MIMO antenna with (a) 8- and (b) 12-element configuration.
Figure 22. S-parameter results of the MIMO antenna with (a) 8- and (b) 12-element configuration.
Electronics 15 02564 g022
Figure 23. Radiation patterns of the 8/12-element MIMO antennas at (a) 28 GHz, (b) 33 GHz and (c) 38 GHz.
Figure 23. Radiation patterns of the 8/12-element MIMO antennas at (a) 28 GHz, (b) 33 GHz and (c) 38 GHz.
Electronics 15 02564 g023
Figure 24. (a) Total efficiency and (b) maximum gain comparisons of the MIMO antennas with various number of elements.
Figure 24. (a) Total efficiency and (b) maximum gain comparisons of the MIMO antennas with various number of elements.
Electronics 15 02564 g024
Table 1. The antenna design parameter values.
Table 1. The antenna design parameter values.
Param.WgW1L1
(mm)30101.515
Param.W2L2W3W4
(mm)1531.54
Table 2. Measured and simulated gain and efficiency of Antenna 1.
Table 2. Measured and simulated gain and efficiency of Antenna 1.
FrequencySim. Gain (dBi)Mea. Gain (dBi)Sim. Eff. (%)Mea. Eff. (%)
28 GHz5.85.69691
38 GHz4.54.49590
Table 3. Comparison table.
Table 3. Comparison table.
Ref.Antenna TypeBandwidthPortsSize (mm2)Efficiency (%)Isolation (dB)
[12]Patch Pairs26–30 (4 GHz)430 × 3580%<−10
[13]Tapered Slot26–40 (14 GHz)4158 × 7875%<−17
[14]Rectangular Patch28/38 (2 GHz)2110 × 5590%<−28
[15]Semicircular Patch37–39 (2 GHz)425 × 2595%<−25
[16]Aperture Coupled25–27.8 (2.8 GHz)436 × 3690%<−22
[17]Shell Monopole27–30 (3 GHz)430 × 3084%<−28
[18]Circular Monopole27/39 (2 GHz)226 × 1198%<−25
[19]Coupled Monopole26–40 (14 GHz)255 × 2860–90%<−30
[20]Air-Filled Loop28/38 (4 GHz)3110 × 5590%<−28
[21]C-Shaped Monopole24–38 (14 GHz)442 × 4290%<−25
[22]Arc Patch23–38 (15 GHz)480 × 8070%<−20
[23]HP-Shaped Patch37–40 (3 GHz)447.5 × 39.579%<−27
[24]Modified Monopole28/38 (2 GHz)432 × 3290%<−21
[25]Patch Array31–39 (8 GHz)290 × 30--
[26]Rectangular Slot25–35 (10 GHz)436 × 3092%<−20
This WorkFractal Monopole26.5–41 (14.5 GHz)430 × 3097%<−30
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jahanbakhsh Basherlou, H.; Ojaroudi Parchin, N.; See, C.H. A Compact Fractal-Based Super-Wideband mmWave MIMO Antenna for 5G NR and 6G Services. Electronics 2026, 15, 2564. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15122564

AMA Style

Jahanbakhsh Basherlou H, Ojaroudi Parchin N, See CH. A Compact Fractal-Based Super-Wideband mmWave MIMO Antenna for 5G NR and 6G Services. Electronics. 2026; 15(12):2564. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15122564

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jahanbakhsh Basherlou, Haleh, Naser Ojaroudi Parchin, and Chan Hwang See. 2026. "A Compact Fractal-Based Super-Wideband mmWave MIMO Antenna for 5G NR and 6G Services" Electronics 15, no. 12: 2564. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15122564

APA Style

Jahanbakhsh Basherlou, H., Ojaroudi Parchin, N., & See, C. H. (2026). A Compact Fractal-Based Super-Wideband mmWave MIMO Antenna for 5G NR and 6G Services. Electronics, 15(12), 2564. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15122564

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop