Next Article in Journal
Centralized Multi-Sensor GLMB Smoother for Multi-Target Tracking
Previous Article in Journal
A Pipelined FPGA-Based Frame Synchronizer for Gaussian Noise Channels
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design of a Brushless DC Motor Drive System Controller Integrating the Zebra Optimization Algorithm and Sliding Mode Theory
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Sensitivity-Driven Decomposition for Multi-Objective Magnetic Gear Optimization: A Sobol-Guided Two-Stage Framework

by
Bin Zhang
1,
Jinghong Zhao
1,
Yihui Xia
1,*,
Xiang Peng
1,
Xiaohua Shi
1 and
Xuedong Zhu
2
1
Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430072, China
2
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2025, 14(23), 4725; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14234725 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 October 2025 / Revised: 26 November 2025 / Accepted: 26 November 2025 / Published: 30 November 2025

Abstract

This paper presents a novel Sensitivity-Guided Two-Stage Optimization (SGTSO) framework for magnetic gear (MG) design, introducing two fundamental methodological advances: (1) the adoption of global Sobol sensitivity analysis, which transcends conventional local sensitivity techniques by holistically quantifying both individual parameter effects and the interactions across the complete design space, and (2) the establishment of a mathematically guaranteed convergent two-stage optimization methodology that strategically decomposes high-dimensional problems into sequential subproblems. Unlike traditional one-factor-at-a-time sensitivity approaches that overlook parameter interdependencies, Sobol indices deliver quantitative evaluation of individual parameter contributions and coupling effects. The two-stage optimization architecture is rigorously proven to converge to near-optimal solutions under weak parameter coupling assumptions, with mathematically derived error bounds The optimized configuration achieves remarkable performance features: 65.4% suppression of inner rotor torque ripple, 27.2% reduction in outer rotor torque ripple, and 19.2% decrease in Permanent Magnet (PM) utilization, while preserving average torque output within a marginal 4.03% reduction. The proposed framework achieves a 5.25-fold enhancement in computational efficiency while maintaining mathematical convergence assurance, marking a substantial progression beyond conventional heuristic optimization paradigms.
Keywords: magnetic gear; multi-objective optimization; parameter sensitivity; grouped optimization; Kriging model; NSGA-II magnetic gear; multi-objective optimization; parameter sensitivity; grouped optimization; Kriging model; NSGA-II

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, B.; Zhao, J.; Xia, Y.; Peng, X.; Shi, X.; Zhu, X. Sensitivity-Driven Decomposition for Multi-Objective Magnetic Gear Optimization: A Sobol-Guided Two-Stage Framework. Electronics 2025, 14, 4725. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14234725

AMA Style

Zhang B, Zhao J, Xia Y, Peng X, Shi X, Zhu X. Sensitivity-Driven Decomposition for Multi-Objective Magnetic Gear Optimization: A Sobol-Guided Two-Stage Framework. Electronics. 2025; 14(23):4725. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14234725

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Bin, Jinghong Zhao, Yihui Xia, Xiang Peng, Xiaohua Shi, and Xuedong Zhu. 2025. "Sensitivity-Driven Decomposition for Multi-Objective Magnetic Gear Optimization: A Sobol-Guided Two-Stage Framework" Electronics 14, no. 23: 4725. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14234725

APA Style

Zhang, B., Zhao, J., Xia, Y., Peng, X., Shi, X., & Zhu, X. (2025). Sensitivity-Driven Decomposition for Multi-Objective Magnetic Gear Optimization: A Sobol-Guided Two-Stage Framework. Electronics, 14(23), 4725. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14234725

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop