Next Article in Journal
Industrial Hemp Fibers: An Overview
Previous Article in Journal
Ytterbium Silicate Fibers: Fabrication, Microstructure and Strength
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Nano-Structured Optical Fibers Made of Glass-Ceramics, and Phase Separated and Metallic Particle-Containing Glasses

Photonics Laboratory, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 3, 33720 Tampere, Finland
Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Institut de Physique de Nice, UMR 7010, 06108 Nice, France
ICI - Institut du Calcul Intensif Ecole Centrale de Nantes, BP 92101, 44321 Nantes, France
MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, CEMEF-Centre for material forming, UMR 7635, 06904 Sophia-Antipolis, France
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fibers 2019, 7(12), 105;
Received: 3 October 2019 / Revised: 21 November 2019 / Accepted: 25 November 2019 / Published: 30 November 2019


For years, scientists have been looking for different techniques to make glasses perfect: fully amorphous and ideally homogeneous. Meanwhile, recent advances in the development of particle-containing glasses (PCG), defined in this paper as glass-ceramics, glasses doped with metallic nanoparticles, and phase-separated glasses show that these “imperfect” glasses can result in better optical materials if particles of desired chemistry, size, and shape are present in the glass. It has been shown that PCGs can be used for the fabrication of nanostructured fibers—a novel class of media for fiber optics. These unique optical fibers are able to outperform their traditional glass counterparts in terms of available emission spectral range, quantum efficiency, non-linear properties, fabricated sensors sensitivity, and other parameters. Being rather special, nanostructured fibers require new, unconventional solutions on the materials used, fabrication, and characterization techniques, limiting the use of these novel materials. This work overviews practical aspects and progress in the fabrication and characterization methods of the particle-containing glasses with particular attention to nanostructured fibers made of these materials. A review of the recent achievements shows that current technologies allow producing high-optical quality PCG-fibers of different types, and the unique optical properties of these nanostructured fibers make them prospective for applications in lasers, optical communications, medicine, lighting, and other areas of science and industry.

1. Introduction

The ground-breaking discovery done in the 1960s by Charles K. Kao on fibers of very pure glass possessing very low absorption losses allowed fiber optics to transfer from the theoretical to the practical. High purity silica-glass fibers with losses of about 0.2 dB/km led to the development of fiber-optic communications, which nowadays connect millions of people all over the world. Optical fibers became a perfect host for laser development. They can be used to measure strain, temperature, and pressure just to cite a few applications. Despite this tremendous success, the fiber-optics is still a rapid and active developing area of science.
Made of glass, optical fibers inherited all positive and negative properties of this material. Glasses are easy and inexpensive to produce on any scale and in any shape, they can possess high chemical stability and mechanical strength, and have high transparency. However, they could hardly compete, for example, with crystalline materials in thermal conductivity, or rare-earth elements’ absorption, emission cross-sections, and available transparency range. Recent advances in glass science showed that properties of this material can be significantly improved if some additional phases are formed or impregnated in the glass. In particular, advances have been achieved in the development of particle-containing glasses: glass-ceramic materials, glasses doped with metallic nanoparticles, and phase-separated glasses. To date, these particle-containing glasses have become quite common and actively used in case of the bulk materials, but are still rather new for fiber optics.
The purpose of this review is to summarize recent advances in the fabrication of structured fibers made of particle-containing glasses, their potential benefits, their actual properties, and their potential applications. The review covers three types of particle-containing glasses (PCG): crystalline dielectric particles, i.e., glass-ceramics; metallic nanoparticles (MeNPs); and dielectric amorphous particles, i.e., phase-separated glasses.
First, we consider properties of the PCG bulk materials, their potential benefits over the homogenous materials (Section 2), their fabrication (Section 3), characterization methods (Section 4) and factors influencing the transparency of these materials (Section 5). Since to a large extent we deal with the same material when referring to bulk glass and their corresponding optical fibers, ideas and methods used for the bulk materials can be applied to fibers too. Nevertheless, there are, of course, many peculiarities during the fiber fabrication process, which are considered in Section 6. The last part of the review is focused on the recent experimental advances in the fabrication of PCG fibers, their properties, and their applications available in the scientific literature (Section 7).

2. Potential Benefits of PCGs

2.1. Glass-Ceramics

The first glass-ceramic (GC) was discovered in the 1960s by Stookey who defined GCs this way: “Glass-ceramics are made by first melting and forming special glasses containing nucleating agents and then causing controlled crystallization of the glass” [1]. Since then, interest in novel GCs has increased. New GCs with promising properties have been developed in the past six decades leading to new knowledge and fundamental understanding of the nucleation and growth mechanisms in glasses and so to an updated definition for GC: “Glass-ceramics are inorganic, non-metallic materials prepared by controlled crystallization of glasses via different processing methods. They contain at least one type of functional crystalline phase and a residual glass. The volume fraction crystallized may vary from ppm to almost 100%” [2].
Glass-ceramics possess various advantages compared to glasses. They possess better mechanical and thermal properties than glasses. As the transparency of the first GC was sufficiently good (up to 90% in the visible wavelength range), imaging through short path lengths was possible, leading to the commercial cookware application [3]. This work became a baseline and led to discovery of many new transparent glass-ceramic systems [4,5,6], just to cite the first transparent GCs. It was shown that glass-ceramics could be easily treated and also drawn into fibers [7].
Soon it became obvious that GC materials also have great potential for optical materials as the crystalline particles in the glass can affect the phonon spectra of the glass and its luminescence properties: the GCs can exhibit sharper and more intense luminescence than glasses with similar dopants if the rare-earth elements (REE) ions are located in the crystals. However, the scattering of the first REE-doped GCs was too intense, limiting their practical use for optical devices [8]. A novel REE-doped GC with transparency comparable to glass was reported in 1993 by Wang and Ohwaki [9]. The GC contained crystalline PbxCd1−xF2 cubic fluoride phase doped with Er3+ and Yb3+ ions. This novel GC combined the advantages of glasses and of crystals, especially the optical features of low phonon fluoride crystals with the advantages of aluminosilicate glass opening the path to new luminescent materials. Today, GCs are used for various applications from cookware to very large mirrors for telescopes. Therefore, one of the challenges lies in the control of the growth of the crystals with the aim of fabricating transparent GCs.

2.2. Phase-Separated Glasses

Early works on the immiscibility and phase separation within glass-forming systems were done in the 1920s [10,11]. In contrast to the formation of crystalline or metallic particles, a liquid–liquid separation occurs with the formation of two amorphous phases. Droplets of one glass are distributed within another. The Na2O–B2O3–SiO2 system is probably one of the most well-known examples of phase separation in glasses. This chemical system has a wide miscibility gap, and the glasses can be easily phase-separated into boron and silica-rich phases.
Phase separation is an effect which people usually would like to avoid during the glass preparation. Indeed, the formation of a heterogeneous material significantly modifies the physical and chemical properties of the final glass. However, these heterogeneous materials may bring some advantages over traditional glasses. The glass–glass phase separation can be a precursor for subsequent crystal nucleation and growth, allowing a better control of the synthesis of the glass-ceramic materials [12,13,14]. The “Vycor” type glasses are obtained by leaching out the boron-rich phase from the demixed Na2O–B2O3–SiO2 glass. This technology can be used to form a broad-range anti-reflective coatings in borosilicate glasses, for example [15]. The formation of different phases can also significantly change the optical properties of the glass. The presence of the particles in the glass can lead to high scattering, and if the particles are too coarse, to opalescence of the material. The higher scattering could provide significant benefits for specific light propagation cases, illumination, or random lasing applications. At the same time, the dopants present in the host glass can be redistributed among the phases, resulting, for example, in a higher concentration of the REE in one of the phases [16]. This can induce additional concentration losses, as it was shown, for example, for Er3+ in alkali borosilicate glasses [17] and enhancement of the up-conversion luminescence, which was demonstrated recently for fluorosilicate glasses [18]. The liquid phase-separation of glass adds one more possibility to control the properties of the glasses and produce new unique optical materials.

2.3. Metallic Nanoparticles in Glasses

Since ancient times MeNPs have been used to improve the optical properties of glasses. At first, they were used to produce art objects made of beautiful coloured glasses. With time, these glasses became much more important for technological applications.
One of the most well-known effects originating from the MeNPs is metal enhanced fluorescence (MEF). Experiments in fluorescence enhancement in the proximity of metal surfaces and the development of the appropriate theoretical background have been reported since the 1970s [19]. It is known that the presence of MeNPs can increase the emission intensity several hundred times for fluorophores of different origins, including REE. To date, MEF has been successfully demonstrated in glass media with different REE-MeNPs combinations [20,21,22,23,24,25]. Silver and gold are the most common materials used for MeNPs. They are capable of enhancing emission intensity from the REE by several times. It is shown that the enhancement factor depends on the emission wavelength: the closer is an optical transition to the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) band, the higher is the increase [24]. Nevertheless, a significant effect can be observed even far from the resonance frequencies, as it was demonstrated for Er3+4I13/24I15/2 transition (~1.54 µm) in presence of Ag- [25] and Au-NPs [26]. The presence of MeNPs can also affect and enhance the up-conversion efficiency in Er3+-MeNPs co-doped materials [20,27].
To understand mechanisms laying behind these phenomena, many experiments with precise control of fluorophore-metal distances at the nanometre scale have been performed [28,29,30,31,32,33]. Today it is commonly accepted that there are three possible mechanisms responsible for the MEF effect. (1) The first is the enhancement of the local incident field in the presence of the metal particles in the proximity of the emitting centre [34]. The incoming electromagnetic waves excite collective oscillations of the nanoparticles’ conduction band electrons, known as LSPRs, producing electrical fields that are locally concentrated. In this case, metals operate like a nanoscale antenna allowing one to achieve the local field intensity enhancement up to ~12,000 [35], subsequently increasing the rate of excitation of the fluorophore [34]. (2) The second possible mechanism is that the metal in the vicinity of a fluorophore can influence its radiative decay rate [34]. This gives a possibility to control the decay rate; i.e., so-called radiative decay engineering. Theory predicts that the increase in the decay rate can be up to 106-fold. This should result in the quantum yield of the fluorophore near unity and very short emission lifetime [36]. (3) The last possible mechanism is fluorophore–metal resonance energy transfer. In this case, after excitation the fluorophore can induce oscillations in the metal and excite plasmons; i.e., the fluorophore–metal couple can be considered in terms of a donor–acceptor pair concept. The optical emission occurs not from the fluorophore but from the excited plasmon. However, in contrast to a classical donor–acceptor pair, the plasmon emission can match precisely with the usual emission spectrum of the fluorophores [37]. Thus, if the transfer is efficient and fast, the overall emission quantum yield becomes equal to the quantum yield of the plasmons, which can quench and enhance the emission of the system. The typical lifetimes of plasmons are very short (~10 fs), and this mechanism results in a decrease of the emission lifetime.
The dominant MEF mechanism depends on many factors. However, one of the key factors for different systems is fluorophore–metal distance. Excessive proximity often leads to a significant quenching of luminescence [33,38]. To achieve the maximum effect both the fluorophore and MeNPs should be at some optimal distance, which varies depending on the system from nm to tens of nm [32,39]. Recent research considers that the quenching is not fundamentally obligatory and mostly depends only on the ability of the induced surface plasmons to emit (or not) the light. Besides these three mechanisms, it is also proposed that the MeNPs could serve as chemical absorbents of OH-groups, increasing the number of hydroxyl-free optical centres; e.g., Er3+ ions [26].
The effect of local electromagnetic field enhancement due to LSPR in presence of MeNPs can be used for different types of surface-enhanced spectroscopies. In particular, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is characterized by enhancements of up to 108 in the Raman cross-section of analytes bound to MeNPs [40,41]. The resonance wavelength of the LSPR depends on many factors, including the particle size and shape, chemical composition, and their dielectric environment [41,42,43,44]. The latter makes it possible to follow the changes in the MeNPs environment, controlling the LSPR band properties. Therefore, the effects observed in the presence of MeNPs are widely used for surface-enhanced spectroscopies techniques and sensing applications.
The local enhancement of the electromagnetic field close to the surface of the MeNPs also modifies the linear and nonlinear optical properties of the glasses. Particularly, the value of their Kerr coefficient can be enhanced by several orders of magnitude in comparison to the same host medium without the MeNPs [45]. It is suggested that the high optical nonlinearity is due to an increase of the electron temperature caused by the incident laser beam, which determines short response fast relaxation times of several to tens of picoseconds [45,46]. These features make MeNP-doped glasses attractive for optical switching and computing.

3. Preparation of Particle-Containing Glasses

Glass-ceramics are usually fabricated using a two-step process. (1) The first step consists of preparing a homogeneous glass, which can be done using several methods, with the conventional melt-quench technique being the most common one. However, significant fluorine loss can occur when melting an oxyfluoride glass at high temperature (1400–1700 °C), limiting the fluorine content in the glass [47]. High metal content silicate glasses, for example, glasses within the ZrO2–SiO2, HfO2–SiO2, and La2O3–SiO2 systems, have high melting temperatures (>1700 °C) [48], and their melts tend to demix or crystallize upon quenching [49]. The sol-gel technique is an alternative process to prepare glasses, especially oxyfluoride [50] and metal-silicate compositions [51,52]. It allows the preparation of novel glasses at a lower temperature compared to the conventional melt-quench process, achieving a wider range of compositions, in particular, a high amount of fluorine in the glass with better dispersion of the components. Additionally, the sol-gel technique is handy, flexible, and quite cheap. (2) The second step in the fabrication of glass-ceramics includes the heat treatment of the starting glasses under specific heating conditions. The heat-treatment can lead to surface and/or volume precipitation of the dielectric crystals (hereinafter just “crystals”), but volume crystallization is desirable for the preparation of transparent GCs. In most of the GCs, this volume crystallization can be favoured by adding nucleation agents. Usually, the heat-treatment is done using a two-step process. During the first heat treatment, the formation of the precursors of the crystalline phases, i.e., nucleation, is happening. The temperature during this step should be high enough to achieve mobility of the ions in the glass matrix, but not too high, to avoid dissolution of the nuclei or extensive growth of the crystals. After, the nucleated glass is heat-treated at a higher temperature so that the nuclei can grow into larger crystals. The temperature during the growth step should be close to the crystallization temperature of the glass, that the heat treatment leads to the precipitation of crystalline particles within the glass matrix. During this step, the nuclei grow continuously, and their volume increases, until they are impeded by neighbouring crystals. Then, secondary growth is observed, resulting in the fusion of smaller crystals to larger ones. The size and concentration of the crystals are determined by the temperature and the duration of the thermal treatments and by the chemical composition of the glass.
The heat treatment can lead to phase separation and to devitrification of the glass, resulting in the formation of amorphous or crystalline (dielectric or metallic) particles in the bulk material. Although these processes have been described in various papers and books [53,54,55,56], this conventional heat-treatment method is very complex to control experimentally. Phase separation in glass is a phenomenon in which a homogeneous glass separates into two or more glass phases of different compositions [57]. This effect is observed only for glasses of the compositions within an immiscibility gap. The binodal or spinodal mechanism of the demixing depends on the composition of the glass and usually results in the formation of isolated droplets or interconnected structures, respectively. For the moment, these ranges are rather well-known for borates [58], borosilicates [59], metal oxide–silica [60], tellurite [61,62], and other glass systems. Usually, the decomposition is performed in a single step by an isothermal heat-treatment at a temperature above the glass transition temperature (Tg). The degree of the demixing depends on time and temperature of the heat treatment and chemical composition. For more detailed information on the decomposition of the glasses, its mechanisms, and its nature, please refer to the reviews [57,63].
For the formation of the MeNPs, a glass should contain ions of the desired metal in their composition. Besides conventional melt-quenching and sol-gel techniques, the ions can be introduced by ion-exchange [64,65,66]. Not all metals tend to form clusters and can be easily reduced to metal under heat treatment. Therefore, the most common metals to form MeNPs in glass are gold and silver, sometimes copper, and nickel. The growth and nucleation of MeNPs can be controlled through subsequent annealing procedure above the glass transition temperature, which is usually done by a single step isothermal heat-treatment. It is important to note, that being at the beginning in the form of ions, the metals need to be reduced to form MeNPs. This may require the introduction of additional polyvalent ions, such as antimony [67] or iron [66], capable of serving as an electron donor, limiting the yield of the MeNPs formed.
Unfortunately, as of today, there is no general and precise empirical or theoretical model, that would allow one to predict of the crystallization process or phase separation for a glass a given chemical composition. Phase separation, the formation of metallic nanoparticles and/or crystallization could occur simultaneously during the heat-treatment, having a huge influence of the resulting material. In particular, the influence of the phase separation on the crystallization behaviour of the glasses can enhance or suppress the devitrification depending on the composition and is still under active investigation. The formation of MeNPs could be accompanied by the precipitation of some dielectric crystals, as it was found by da Silva et al. [20]. Phase diagrams can be used to design and estimate the crystals precipitating in novel GCs. Numerical tools are also under development to simulate the formation of the nanoparticles. For instance, molecular dynamics allow simulating the formation of phase-separated nanoparticles in oxide [68], aluminosilicate [69], and oxyfluoride [70] glass optical fibers. Reviews on the preparation methods and properties of transparent glass-ceramics can be found in [71,72].
To overcome the limits of the classical heat-treatment approach, alternative methods and some modifications in the preparation technique have been proposed. MeNPs can be formed by direct ion implantation in the glass. This was demonstrated for Ag [73], Au [74,75], Cu [76,77], Ni [78], and for different metal pairs [77,79]. Commonly, positive ions are used for the implantation, which after requiring a charge compensation for the formation of the neutral particles, may cause glass elements migration [73]. Alternatively, the use of negative ions allows obtaining the charge balance due to the secondary electron emission from the sample [76,78]. Ion implantation makes it possible to achieve a concentration of Me-atoms higher than the solubility limit in target materials without any heat treatment. The technique is suitable and versatile since virtually any element can be introduced in the glass, and moreover, the method allows material direct patterning.
It was demonstrated that silver particles in ion-exchanged glasses could be obtained by electron-beam irradiation, allowing higher yield and concentration, speed and reproducibility, a homogeneous arrangement of particles, and a narrow distribution in size of the particles [80]. Laser irradiation also can cause reduction of the ions. It was found that the irradiation of Au2O3-doped silicate glass samples with a femtosecond laser could locally reduce Au+ to metal, which can serve as the nuclei for the formation of the MeNPs during the subsequent heat-treatment [81]. This allows controlling the formation of the MeNPs inside a bulk sample with a high spatial resolution.
Lasers and electron beams (E-beams) have been also used to precipitate crystals within the glass matrix [82,83]. However, these techniques are not easy to use, as most of the glasses are stable against crystallization. GCs have been also obtained from controlled cooling of the melt which was found to be an alternative, effective approach to fabricate transparent GCs [84]. A REE-doped phosphosilicate transparent GC was obtained by melting followed by a devitrification during cooling [85]. Nakanishi and Tanabe prepared GCs using the ‘‘frozen sorbent method” [86]; the GC was prepared by quenching a melt of a composition outside the glass-forming region. Several oxide GCs were successfully prepared using this technique. These methods do not require additional isothermal treatment steps.
GCs can also be prepared by sintering glass powders. A variety of low-melting glasses, including borate and heavy metal oxide-based glasses, have been under investigation due to their sufficient chemical stability. Borosilicate glass was successfully sintered with the Y3Al5O12: Ce3+ (YAG: Ce3+) crystals [87]. However, it is important to note that the transparency levels of the GCs prepared using this technique are typically less compared to the GCs prepared by heat-treatment of the glasses, due to the scattering from the remaining pores and grain boundaries.
Another approach to prepare glass-ceramics is to incorporate REE-doped nanocrystals, also called active nanoparticles (NPs), in the glass. This approach provides a host lattice structure for rare-earth ions and specified, tuneable luminescence properties [88]. In this approach, the glass is prepared with active nanoparticles, so the rare-earth ions are uninfluenced from the host network [89]. Such glass combines the low cost and the mechanical stability of the glass and the augmented luminescence properties of the NPs. The crystalline nanoparticles can be dispersed in the doping solution when preparing a glass using the modified vapor chemical deposition technique or in the glass batch when using the standard melting process. However, an insufficient dispersion of the NPs was reported in melted glass [90]. The dissolution of the NPs can also occur in the glass melt [91,92]. The direct doping of NPs into glass melts was developed as an advanced modification of this technique [93]. In this approach, the NPs are added in the glass batch after the melting at a lower temperature than was used during the melting process. The temperature at which the NPs are added and the dwell time before quenching the glass melt need to be optimized to ensure the survival and dispersion of the NPs in the glass [94,95]. As reported in [96], the survival of the particles depends on the melting conditions and on the composition of the glass and the NPs.

4. Characterization of PCGs

Various techniques can be used applied to characterize the micro and nanostructures, the chemical compositions, and the optical properties of PCGs.
For the GC and MeNPs, X-ray diffraction (XRD) can be used to determine the crystalline phases formed in the material and the unit cell parameters. The Scherrer equation also allows one to calculate the average size of the crystals [97]. This equation takes into account the broadening of the corresponding X-ray diffraction lines due to finite size of coherent scattering area. As the XRD technique acquires the signal from a macro-sized sample, i.e., measuring an average over the sample, this technique does not allow one to characterize the morphology and distribution of the particles formed in the glass.
Detailed structural characterizations of the PCGs can be done using Raman scattering spectroscopy. The spectra are determined by the short-order structure of the materials; i.e., sensitive to amorphous and crystalline inclusions. The minimal spatial resolution of the method can achieve about 200 nm when using a confocal Raman microscope with a UV-laser excitation source [98]; even higher resolution (~50 nm) can be obtained using a nano-Raman implementation of the method [99]. This allows one to image sub-micron crystalline [99,100] and amorphous particles [101,102] in the PCGs. Raman scattering can be also applied to characterize the phase-separated glasses, where sizes of the structures can be well below 100 nm. However, no information about the spatial distribution of the phases can be obtained in this case [103,104].
The nanostructure of the PCGs can be obtained using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and its high-resolution analogue (HRTEM), as it is demonstrated in [105,106,107,108]. In particular, HRTEM can be used to reveal the lattice planes and the crystal-size distribution. An example of such analysis is shown in Figure 1a–c. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is also commonly used to image the surface of the PCGs from nano- to micrometre scale depending on the size of the crystallites and the resolution of the instrument. SEM can also provide information about the composition of the nanophase when combined with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy accessory (EDX) [17,109,110,111,112]. An example of combined a SEM/EDX analysis is shown in Figure 1d.
In the case of REE-doped materials, important information can be obtained by the use of absorption and fluorescence optical spectroscopies. Optical characterizations are very useful to discriminate the location of REE-ions as their emission and absorption spectra are strongly affected by the local environment of the REE: in the crystalline environment, the spectra consist of sharp peaks while they are broader when the REE is located in a glassy environment. Fluorescence spectroscopy can reach a sub-micron resolution if a confocal microscope is used for the measurement, allowing one to follow the changes in the optical properties between different phases in the PCGs, especially in the GCs. Similarities in the equipment needed for the Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopies make it possible to use a Raman confocal microscope to measure both the structural and the emission properties in the same area with high spatial resolution [104]. In this case, the type of signal depends on the wavelength of the excitation laser (Figure 2).
Special attention is paid to the determination of the nonlinear properties at 1.55 µm. In the case of the fibers, this is commonly done by the resonant optical nonlinearity measurement using a long-period fiber grating pair, initially proposed by Kim et al. [114]. The method is based on the fact that the change in the refractive index of the fiber core is related to the shift in wavelength arising from the interference between the core mode and the cladding mode of the fiber through the long-period fiber grating pair. For a more detailed description of this method, please refer to the original work [114].
The methods mentioned above have become commonly available nowadays in many laboratories. Additional characterization can be done using some more rare methods. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) can be used to determine the local environment and the redox of a specific element after a heat-treatment or in situ [113,115,116,117,118]. Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) examines the structure of the PCGs with a characteristic scale of 1–100 nm [119,120,121]. Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) imaging can be used to characterize the chemical composition with high spatial resolution (60 nm). In particular, SIMS has been applied to evidence the partitioning of P, Mg, and Er elements in phase-separated nanoparticles formed in a silica-based optical fiber [122]. More recently, atom probe tomography (APT) has been employed to characterize, with a sub-nm spatial resolution, the composition of nanoparticles embedded in a glassy matrix [123].

5. Control of PCGs Transparency

One of the most important requirements when preparing transparent optical PCGs is the light scattering, including Rayleigh scattering, which should be minimized. When the size of the particles is close to the wavelength of the excitation radiation, micro-inhomogeneity occurs, leading to Mie scattering. Therefore, the size of the particles formed should be controlled. In the case of dielectric particles, the inclusions should have a refractive index similar to that of the host glass. According to Hopper [124] nanocrystals with a size <30 nm and a difference between the refraction coefficients of crystalline and glassy phases <0.3 can lead to transparent GCs.
In [125], four empirically determined requirements for ultra-transparency, as expected for optical fiber, were proposed: (i) particle size must be less than 15 nm, (ii) separation between the particles must be comparable to their size, (iii) particle size distribution must be narrow, and (iv) there must be no clustering of particles. Tick suggested that the transmission loss could be, also, minimized of the order of tens of decibels per kilometre by removing all the impurities. Later, Tick et al. demonstrated that the increase in the losses after heat treatment of fiber could be related to the different particle size distribution in the fibers and not to the mean particle size [126].
All these considerations on the characteristics of the nanoparticles aim to design a “transparent” fiber laser or amplifier; i.e., where nanoparticles would have a negligible impact on light scattering. However, light propagation in highly scattering media is a very active research area, leading to tailored light propagation in such media. For instance, by using a spatial light modulator (SLM) to shape the wavefront of the incident beam, light transmitted through a scattering medium can be focused at the output [127] or focused inside the scattering medium [128]. This approach opens new opportunities to promote nanoparticles-doped optical fiber lasers or amplifiers but necessitates one to use free space components such as SLMs which may impede their applications.
Scatterers can also be intentionally embedded in the fiber core to manage light properties during its propagation. For instance, the random fiber laser is a well-known example of photonic devices based on disordered-induced light scattering developed during the last decade. A random laser is a mirrorless laser where the properties of the light generated are defined by random multiple scattering of photons in the optical gain medium. Various configurations have been investigated, such as the dispersion of TiO2 particles in a rhodamine 6G solution [129] or of polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes nanoparticles and laser dye pyrromethene 597 in carbon disulphide [130], injected in the hollow core of a photonic crystal. In conventional telecommunications fiber, the intrinsic disorder (density and refractive index heterogeneities) has been exploited [131]. For a recent review on random fiber lasers, one can read [132]. When the size of the scatterers is about the wavelength, the light can be trapped between these randomly disordered heterogeneities through the Anderson localization mechanism [133]. If the transverse random distribution is longitudinally invariant along the fiber, the light can be guided through the transverse Anderson localization [134]. In such fiber, there is no core-cladding structure. As any location across the transverse section of the fiber guides the light, it can be used to transport an image [135]. One of the main issues related to this class of fiber relies on the ability to prepare long fiber length with invariant transverse random distribution. Several approaches are under investigation and reviewed in this paper [136].

6. Fiber Fabrication Methods

Most of the PCG fibers are drawn using the rod-in-tube technique [137]. In this technique, the prepared bulk glass is first made into a cylindrical rod through cold working and inserted into a prepared hollow glass tube with a sealed bottom to form a preform. Usually, clad and core glasses have similar compositions and the fiber is drawn near the core glass softening temperature. The use of bulk glasses for the preform preparation ensures tremendous versatility in the chemical composition of the fibers. Nevertheless, contamination on the surface of fiber core and cladding and residual surface defects can restrain its practicability. Moreover, the softening temperature of the core glass is typically higher than its crystallization temperature, making it hard to control the crystallization process during the drawing step, which may result in the growth of large crystals and so in high transmission losses.
The preform can be, also, obtained by the modified chemical vapor deposition (MCVD) technique (see Figure 3), which is the most common process used to prepare special optical fibers in industry. First described by MacChesney et al. from AT&T Bell Laboratories [138], the method is based on the successive deposition of vitreous layers inside a silica glass tube (Figure 3). The chemical composition of the layers can be controlled by use of different reactive gases (mainly SiCl4, GeCl4, and POCl3 and a fluorine carrier, such as C2F6, SF6, or SiF4), which are carried in the tube by oxygen. However, due to the absence of volatile precursors for many elements, the “pure” MCVD technique is mostly used for the fabrication of passive high-silica fibers with common dopants, such as Ge, P, B, and F [139]. Alternatively, the solution doping method can be used to introduce additive elements, among which are rare-earth elements, aluminium, and other modifiers [140]. In this method a porous silica layer, which is formed by MCVD at relatively low temperature, is soaked with a solution (alcoholic or aqueous) of salts of metal chlorides (ErCl3, AlCl3, etc.). When the solution is removed, the porous layer is first dried, and, after, densified and vitrified at a high temperature (up to 1800 °C). It is also possible to introduce a crystalline phase during the doping step, e.g., using a “slurry doping method,” which is similar to the solution doping technique [141]. After, during so-called collapse step (at a temperature above 2000 °C), the tube is closed and a preform ready for the fiber drawing is obtained.
The particle formation in the glass can be done before, after, or during the fiber drawing step, which is mostly dictated by the composition, type of the end-fiber, and particles to be stabilized. The optical preform is drawn into a fiber on a draw tower at the temperatures above the softening temperature of the glass, which is typically associated with high temperatures; e.g., around 2000 °C for high-silica glasses.
The additional heat-treatment steps, such as drawing (also vitrification and collapsing in the case of MCVD process), can change, drastically, the properties of a PCG: high temperature can lead to devitrification/demixing of the glass, transformation of the crystalline phases, and corrosion or dissolution of the particles. It can also affect the particles’ sizes and shapes. Therefore, in many cases, to avoid these uncontrollable effects, it is preferable and easier to perform an additional heat-treatment step after the drawing of a glass fiber. However, even this additional step can reduce the mechanical strength of the fiber, if surface or too-extensive a crystallization is induced.
To ensure the formation of glass (not PCG) during the drawing, the fiber can be obtained directly from a melt. This can be done using the double crucible technique. The optical fiber is fabricated by melting the core and cladding materials in two joint concentric crucibles and the fiber is drawn from the combined melted glass. As shown in Figure 4, the core and cladding glasses are melted in the inner and outer crucibles, respectively. A somewhat intermediate method, which shares some resemblance with the rod in tube and double crucible methods is the melt-in-tube technique. Instead of using clad and core glasses of similar compositions, it is possible to use a combination of glasses. At the drawing temperature, the core is molten, whereas the clad glass is only softened [143], allowing one to avoid the undesirable crystallization of the fiber core glass. The duration of the heat treatment of the glass fiber also needs to be optimized to avoid the distortion of the fiber during the heat treatment.
Since the light in the traditional core-clad fiber propagates mostly along the core, it is not sensitive to the environment of the fiber itself. Therefore, for sensing applications, it is necessary to form the MeNPs not in the bulk, but on the surface of the fiber. If no relevant charge compensation is provided under the heat-treatment of the glass the MeNPs can precipitate at the surface [144]; i.e., a standard post-annealing is capable of producing MeNPs at the surface. However, for better control of the precipitated MeNPs usually, the particles can be deposited at the surface separately. This can be done chemically. In this case, the glass surface is dipped into a solution with pre-synthesized MeNPs for the formation of a self-assembled monolayer of MeNPs on the surface [145,146,147]. Using this approach, it is not only possible to deposit MeNPs on the outer surfaces, but also to form layers of selected MeNPs inside the channels of microstructured optical fibers [146]. The MeNPs can be also obtained by the sputtering technique: first, a Me nano-layer is formed on the glass surface; then a subsequent annealing allows one to transform the layer into nano-particles and nano-islands [148], whereas the size of the MeNPs depends on the thickness of the initial Me-layer and the subsequent heat-treatment procedure.

7. Advances in the Fabrication of PCG Fibers

7.1. Glass-Ceramics Fibers

One of the first GC fibers was successfully obtained by Zheng, Hu, and Mackenzie in Bi–Ca–Sr–Cu–O system [149,150]. Slight modification of the glass properties by co-coping with Al or V decreased the crystallization tendency, whereas the drawing from a glass preform at the temperature above the crystallization temperature allowed the authors to avoid full devitrification of the materials during this step. The devitrification occurring during the drawing led to precipitation of only very fine particles inside the fibers, whereas a large number of spherical Bi2(Sr, Ca)2CuOx crystals with an average size of 0.5 µm formed on the surface of the fibers [150]. These crystals did not affect the fiber drawing process. The final ceramization was done by heat-treatment of the fibers. Heat treatment of the Al-containing fiber at 825 °C for 12 h in air atmosphere led to the formation of the Bi4Ca3Sr3Cu4Oy crystals.
For optical applications, silicate GCs are the most popular among GC materials due to their unique thermo-mechanical properties, such as very low thermal expansion coefficients, combined with outstanding optical characteristics, as it is possible to stabilize small enough nanocrystals and in this way avoid the light scattering and achieve high optical transmission even in the UV-blue region. Examples of typical crystals formed in silicate glasses can be found in [71]. The first report on an GC silicate fiber laser was reported in 2001 by Samson et al. [151]. Using the double-crucible and rod-in-tube techniques, NdF3-doped GC fiber laser within the SiO2–AlO3/2–CdF2–PbF2–YF3–ZnF2 system was successfully prepared. It was possible to obtain the Nd-doped fluoride crystals in the core of the single-mode optical fiber by its heat-treating at 450 °C for 30 min. The presence of the Nd-doped crystals in the fiber compromised the efficiency of the GC fibers. Such GC fibers could be obtained with low scattering losses as the crystal size was ~10 nm. The work was then focused on transition-metal-doped GC fibers and especially on Cr4+-doped forsterite nanocrystalline fiber which displayed luminescence similar to that of a single crystal [152]. This GC combines the radiative properties of Cr4+-doped crystals with the advantages of glasses. Later, Samson et al. developed novel Ni2+-doped nanocrystalline GC fibers within the SiO2–Ga2O3–Al2O3–K2O–Na2O–Li2O system [153]. The preform was obtained using the rod-in-tube method. Heat treatment of the glass fiber at 850 °C for 2 h led to the precipitation of gallate-rich aluminogallate spinel crystals homogeneously dispersed in the silicate glass matrix. In 2015, Ni2+ doped GC fiber was successfully prepared using the melt-in-tube method [143]. The temperature of 1830 °C was used to fabricate the fiber; the core glass melted while the clad glass was softened. No signs of element inter-diffusion or crystallization were found in the as-drawn glass fibers and the GC fiber was obtained by heat-treating the glass fibers; LiGa5O8 crystals were found to precipitate in the fiber using a heat treatment at 800 °C for 10 h.
The melt-in-tube method was used recently to prepare GC optical fiber containing Ba2TiSi2O8 crystals as the fabrication of such GC fiber using other techniques is challenging [154]. The authors noted that it was impossible to draw the fiber using the rod-in-tube technique due to the high crystallization rate of the materials (see Figure 5, left panel). In the case of the amorphous fiber, Ba2TiSi2O8 nanocrystals could precipitate in the fiber core evenly with a diameter between 1.0 and 6.0 nm to ensure low transmission loss using a heat treatment at a temperature of about 850 °C for 5 h (see Figure 5, right panel). These studies clearly show that the melt-in-tube fabrication method is a promising new process to obtain GC fibers, which cannot be fabricated using the conventional rod-in-tube method.
Yb-doped GC fiber was also successfully drawn from yttria–alumina–silica GC preform prepared using MCVD [118]. The collapsing step led to the formation of a phase-separated glass with two regions of different compositions. A heat treatment above 1300 °C led to the precipitation of nano-sized particles of YbPO4, which were evidenced by X-ray absorption spectroscopy and by the shape of the emission band which was typical of a structurally ordered phase.
Sakamoto and Yamamoto demonstrated that for Li2O–Al2O–SiO2 it is possible to draw the fibers using pre-crystallized preforms [155]. In this work, it was shown that the drawing step could change the crystalline phase (from β-spodumene to β-quartz) and could reduce the crystallinity. Nevertheless, under optimized parameters, it was possible to get a GC fiber of good quality with a high amount of the crystalline phase.
Despite many successes for the silica glass, REEs do not incorporate well into the silicate glass structure. The low solubility of REE in silica glass directly results in a high probability of phase aggregation and even crystallization [156]. Clusters give rise to luminescence quenching at REE concentrations greater than 100 ppm [157]. Silica glass has relatively high phonon energy that increases the probability of non-radiative relaxation of the luminescent ions. As a consequence, this may decrease the emission quantum yield of certain optical transitions [158]. Then, several glasses were developed over time [159], such as, chalcogenides [160] and fluorides [161] which exhibit improved REE solubility and lower phonon energy. However, these glasses are prone to crystallization during the fiber making process. Additionally, they are not as compatible as silicates with the current common optical fiber cable network. In this context, oxyfluoride GC fibers have been also of great interest for the development of efficient amplifiers or lasers in glass-ceramics, as the fluoride environment is beneficial for the rare-earth ions keeping the chemical and thermal stability and the good mechanical properties of the oxide matrix [162]. The first oxyfluoride GC in bulk form having high transparency was reported for the composition 30SiO2-15AlO1.5-24PbF2-20CdF2-10YbF3-1ErF3. This GC was found to possess efficient up-conversion, which was up to several orders higher when compared to the mother fluoride [9]. Since then, there has been much interest in developing novel transparent oxyfluoride glass-ceramics containing REE-doped fluoride crystals. Reviews on transparent oxyfluoride GCs in bulk form can be found in [163] and [108]. Some of the first transparent oxyfluoride GC fibers were with the composition of 48SiO2-11Al2O3-7Na2CO3-10CaO-10PbO-11PbF2-3ErF3 and 48SiO2-11Al2O3-7Na2CO3-10CaO-10PbO-10PbF2-3YbF3-1ErF3 [105]. They were obtained by heat-treating of the glassy fiber at 700°C for various periods of time. The transparent GCs could be obtained when using the treatment shorter than 32 h. Transparent GCs fibers with SrF2 and LaF3 crystals possessing intense Nd3+ emission were obtained within SiO2–Al2O3–ZnO–Na2O–SrF2 and SiO2–Al2O3–ZnF2–Na2O–LaF3 systems [164]. In this work, Reben et al. showed that the most important parameters to control during fiber drawing were temperature and heating time during the drawing, leading to precipitation of SrF2 nanocrystals in the core of the fiber.
Recently, transparent oxyfluoride Nd3+ doped fibers with the composition 55SiO2–20Al2O3-15Na2O-10LaF3 GCs were successfully prepared using a single crucible method [165]. After drawing, fibers of 5–10 cm in length were heat-treated between 620 and 680 °C for 5 to 120 h in order to precipitate Nd3+ doped LaF3 crystals with a size of 10–20 nm. The fibers exhibit a slower crystallization rate than the parent bulk glass, and therefore, the fibers needed to be heat treated at a higher temperature than the parent bulk glass in order to precipitate crystals with similar size and similar crystal fraction. After, the GC fibers were covered with SiO2 cladding using the sol-gel method. In this way, a multimode fiber with losses of about 20 dB/m at 633 nm at the doping level of 0.1% NdF3 was obtained.
Ytterbium-doped oxyfluoride GC fibers were also obtained within the SiO2-Al2O3-CdF2-PbF2-YF3 [166]. It was shown that partial devitrification of the glass occurs during the conventional glass preform drawing process. Alternatively, the glass fiber could be obtained directly from the melt, whereas the crystallization was done by an additional controlled heat-treatment step. The latter approach was found to be preferable to produce transparent GCs with nanocrystals homogeneously distributed along the fiber, as the drawing of a GC preform did not allow fine tailoring of the crystals’ sizes, shapes, and distribution along the fiber. Pb1−x−y−zCdxYyYbzF2 (x + y + z ≈ 0.3–0.4) nanocrystals with an average size of ~10 nm were found to precipitate in the fiber heat-treated at 460 °C for 20 h, increasing the photoluminescence quantum yield in the near-infrared region compared with the glass-fiber.
GCs oxyfluoride fibers with remarkably enhanced Er3+ 2.7 µm emission under 980 nm excitation were first reported in [167]. The fibers with the core composition 40B2O3-25SiO2-18Na2O-7NaF-10YF3-2ErF3 were obtained using melt in tube technique. Heat treatment at 470–500 °C for 5 h led to precipitation of NaYF4: Er3+ nanocrystals in the core. The increase in the transmission loss values at 1310 nm from 7.44 to 11.81 dB/m after heat treatment was related to the scattering caused by the precipitated nanocrystals.
Efforts have been also focused on the preparation of GCs transparent up to 12 µm using chalcogenide glasses. The crystallization of chalcogenide glasses has been of great interest [168,169,170,171,172,173,174]. However, the crystallization of these glasses is difficult to control, as reported in [173]; Zhang et al. reported that, as for oxide glasses, the control of the nucleation and crystal growth is very sensitive to temperature and to the glass composition. The temperature of the heat treatment should not be too high so the crystal growth can be controlled. If not controlled, the GC loses its transparency. A reasonable nucleation rate was obtained by varying the duration of the treatment, which could last for up to 15 days in order to observe a significant decrease of the expansion coefficient of the final glass-ceramics. In [175], Zhang et al. reported that it is possible to draw the GC with the composition Ga5Sb10Ge25Se60 into infrared transmitting GC fibers. During the fiber drawing, they noticed that the crystals in the GCs continue to grow. Although the scattering losses in short wavelengths increased, the transmission of the GC fibers beyond 6 µm remained unchanged despite the growth of the crystals during the fiber drawing.
The other technique developed to control the rare-earth optical response independently of the host glass composition involves the incorporation of rare-earth-doped nanoparticles in a glass. This new nanoparticle doping MCVD-process was implemented to fabricate REE-doped fibers. Use of erbium-doped nanoparticles allows one to control better Er3+ local environment, decreasing the probability of the pair-formation and up-conversion level, providing longer luminescence lifetimes; achieving high homogeneity of the dopant along the fiber length erbium-doped fibers; and reducing light attenuation level in the fiber [176,177,178,179]. This approach also works for other REEs [179,180]. Fibers have been prepared by adding other NPs, such as REE-doped Y3Al5O12 (YAG) [181] and LaF3 [182,183] nanocrystals. These nanocrystals, used as precursors, allow one to improve the REE luminescence properties. However, direct proof of the existence of the initial nanocrystals in the final fiber is rarely presented. In the case of LaF3 nanoparticles, it has been clearly demonstrated that the integrity of these nanocrystals is not maintained during the MCVD process [183]. Fluor ions react with silicon and form the gaseous SiF4 compound. Even if the nanoparticles could be imaged in the fiber, their composition was La-silicate, not LaF3. Summary information about various nanoparticles suitable host material composition and their characteristics can be found in [184].

7.2. Phase-Separated Fibers

Fabrication of phase-separated fibers is a quite novel area, still having a lot of things to discover. Advances in this area were achieved by the group of W. Blanc. During the fabrication of the silica core using the MCVD process, the sintering of the soaked porous core layer, the collapsing of the tube, and the preform drawing steps require many thermal cycles with temperatures up to more than 2000 °C. These thermal cycles last for only a few seconds to a few minutes at each pass or step at specific point of the fiber. Nevertheless, due to this thermal treatment, inherent to the MCVD process, nanoparticles can be formed in situ through the phase separation mechanism by introducing, through the doping solution, alkaline earth elements, such as magnesium [185], calcium [186], or scandium and yttrium ions [187], resulting in the particles of nm-range size. Later, phase separation was obtained for Mg and La-doped silicate fibers [188,189]. The small size of the nanoparticles allows one to ensure low scattering losses, and at the same time, a significant broadening of the Er3+ emission spectrum was observed (Figure 6a). It is important to note, that the formation of the nanoparticles in these works did not require additional post-heat treatment of the fibers as the nanoparticles formed during the collapsing step of the MCVD process [190]. The particles survive the high-temperature drawing process. However, from the geometrical considerations, it is clear that their shape should evolve. Recently, to shed more light on this question, Vermillac et al. studied the morphologies of oxide particles in optical fibers [191,192]. It was found that during the drawing step, the spherical particles present in the preform could be elongated and even broken up into smaller particles (Figure 6b). The break-up phenomenon can be favoured by decreasing the drawing temperature (increasing drawing tension). This top-down approach (starting from “big” particles in the preform and finishing with “small” nanoparticles in the fiber) opens a new strategy to control the final size of the nanoparticles in the fibers.
The size control of nanophases in fibers provides a great opportunity for new applications. One of the most trivial examples is the development of the light-diffusing fibers used for illumination [193]. In these fibers, the scatterers (which can be air bubbles with a typical size of 50–500 nm) are located in a ring around the fiber core. Despite the apparent simplicity of this approach, one of the main issues relies on the ability to keep the scattered light intensity constant all along the fiber [194]. Sensors were recently developed, based on the enhanced nanoparticle-induced backscattered light and the optical backscatter reflectometry. The fabrication method for these sensors is simplified since there is no need for inscribing reflective elements (such as fiber Bragg gratings) or fabricating microstructures in the fiber. A fiber-optic refractive index sensor was demonstrated by simply etching a high-scattering nanoparticle-doped fiber in hydrofluoric acid [195,196]. A setup for multiplexed distributed optical fiber sensors, which are capable to measure temperature in the range of up to 140 °C (of interest for biomedical applications such as thermo-therapy) with a spatial resolution of 2.5 mm over the several fibers simultaneously, has been reported in [197]. Finally, this approach is also applicable for strain measurements and 3D shape sensing [198,199].

7.3. MeNP-Containing Fibers

To date, most of the efforts have been focused on the fabrication of MeNP-doped silica fibers. Temperatures of about 2000 °C used for the drawing of high silica fibers are lower than the boiling point but high above the melting point of most of the metals. Therefore, MeNPs can survive, and the precipitation of the MeNPs is often performed by heat-treating the preform before the drawing; however, the drawing can change the nanoparticle characteristics dramatically. It is complicated to control the particle size and distribution, making the fabrication of the fibers with particular optical properties more challenging. Ju et al. demonstrated that the MCVD technique can be used for fabrication of Au-NP-doped silica-fibers, but, a shift of the Au-resonance absorption band was observed after the drawing when compared to the preform [200]. This shift was attributed to the recrystallization of the Au metal at high temperatures. Recently de Oliveira et al. studied different ways to produce Au-NP-doped silica fibers in detail, and mentioned that the drawing of a preform, that already has MeNPs inside (see Figure 7a), could result in the fluctuations in the NPs concentration over the length of the fiber, with the formation of regions with higher concentrations of gold clusters. These gold clusters are highly scattered and increase optical losses [201]. Several studies showed that this problem could be solved by co-doping with Al, which was found to lead to a better dispersion of Au-NPs in the final fiber and so to better optical performance [200,201,202].
In the recent work of de Oliveira et al. [201] it was demonstrated that annealing of the fiber under reducing conditions results in the particles similar to the case for nanoparticles formed in the preform, allowing one to reach the concentration of the Au-NPs with resonance absorption band intensity >800 dB/m. At the same time, the fiber is fully spliceable and can be handled in a common way. Better control of the NPs growth process can be achieved if the fiber is exposed to local heating using a CO2 laser instead of being heat-treated in a furnace. The IR irradiation is well absorbed by silicate glasses, allowing one to locally change the temperature and to achieve resolution in the NPs nucleation regions of about 100 μm in fiber length. Changes in the laser power and in the number of scans can be used to precisely control the process of the MeNPs formation via one or two-step procedure, producing fibers with different NP concentrations and size distributions (see Figure 7b).
Despite the difficulties in the fabrication of MeNPs containing fibers, potential enhancement in the luminescence properties inspires scientists to improve the spectroscopic properties of REE-doped fibers using MeNPs. Significant efforts in the development of MeNP-doped optical fibers were performed by the group of W.-T. Han [203,204,205]. In particular, it was demonstrated that co-doping of Er3+-doped germano-silicate optical fiber with Au-NPs allowed increasing the emission intensity under 980 nm excitation about 20% [203]. Authors ascribed the observed enhancement to the absorption of hydroxyl groups by Au-NPs. However, the MeNPs co-doping also can lead to a decreased radiative emission rate; i.e., suppressing the REE luminescence [206]. The other possible reasons for this are the extensive scattering and the additional losses caused by the high MeNPs concentration [206,207].
In comparison to traditional surface sensing systems based on the plasmon resonance effect and including an optical prism in the setup, sensing configuration based on an optical fiber allows one to fabricate a small sensing element with a simplified optical design, which requires only a small sample volume and has great potential for use as disposable fiber-optic sensors and the capability for use in remote sensing [208]. For a sensor fabrication, an unclad region of the fiber can be coated with metal-layer or MeNPs. Commonly, the sensing is based on the evanescent light field absorption in the fiber, which is analogous to attenuated total reflection (ATR) spectroscopy. The sensitivity of the method depends on the length of the sensing (modified) part of the fiber [145] and the morphology of the deposited nanoparticles [209]. A LSPR-sensor based on a modified standard telecommunication single-mode fiber can achieve the sensitivity of about 10−5 RIU [210].
As an alternative to the outer surface, the MeNPs can be deposited on the inner surfaces of a microstructured fiber—the theoretical consideration of such a configuration has predicted its high sensitivity [211]. This approach was successfully realized in the work of A. Csaki et al. [146]. In this study, Ag and Au nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes were deposited inside the channels of microstructured optical fibers with high coating uniformity (see Figure 8). Experimental results agreed well with the theoretical calculations. Moreover, a proof-of-principle sensing experiment demonstrated high sensitivity (up to 78 nm RIU−1) of the obtained sensor and its potential.
Nowadays NIR lasers based on different REEs dominate various practical applications. In particular, Er-doped lasers and amplifiers emitting at around 1.55 µm are used for telecommunications—the application area where the MeNP-doped fibers could be used for optical switching. It is important to note here that the enhancement of the nonlinear properties is the most pronounced for the laser wavelengths, which are in resonance with the plasmon modes of the MeNPs [212]. For the most common Au and Ag particles, the resonance band is typically observed in the visible range. The position of the resonance band can be controlled by the size of the MeNPs and the precipitation of bigger particles can shift the resonance band towards lower energies. The broader tunability range of the resonance can be achieved by an extensive control of the particles geometry and using multipolar plasmon oscillations. In particular, it was demonstrated that the resonance band in the region up to 1 µm can be achieved with a change in length of the Ag nanorods [213]. Nevertheless, even far from the resonance frequencies, e.g., at 1064 nm, nonlinear susceptibilities of the MeNPs in colloids are in order of 10−14 ESU [212], which is about two orders higher when compared to amorphous SiO2 at the same wavelength [214]. Therefore, the properties of the MeNPs will determine the final nonlinear susceptibility when embedded in commonly used optical glasses, such as silica.
In practice, it was demonstrated that the formation of Au-NPs in silica glass fiber permits one to achieve the nonlinear refractive index (n2) of about 10−16 m2/W, which is several times higher in comparison to the reference fiber without the MeNPs [215]. To date, it has been shown that the final nonlinearity depends on the chosen metal, the concentration, and the dispersion of the NPs [202,216,217]. As was already mentioned above, co-doping with Al usually improves the dispersion of the MeNPs in the fiber and can enhance the nonlinear properties [202]. However, this is not always the case. According to Lin et al., high resonant nonlinearity in Ag-NP-doped fibers can be obtained in Al-free fibers [216]. Later, the authors demonstrated that this level of nonlinearity is enough for all-optical switching applications at 1.55 µm [217]. In more recent study on Au-NP-doped fibers it was demonstrated that a higher concentration of the nanoparticles can be achieved in the fiber, resulting in n2 = (6.75 ± 0.55) × 10−15 m2/W; i.e., five orders of magnitude higher than that of silica glass [201].

8. Conclusions

It is proven that particle-containing glasses, i.e., glass-ceramics, glasses doped with metallic nanoparticles, and phase-separated glasses, provide additional freedom degrees in the tuning of material properties compared to the traditional glasses. Moreover, these materials can be obtained in fiber form, resulting in novel materials for fiber optics—nanostructured fibers. These PCG-fibers have demonstrated a significant enhancement of the spectroscopic properties, increase in detection sensitivity, higher nonlinearities, and other advances over traditional glass fibers. However, only PCGs with desired chemistry, size, and shape of particles in the glass have a positive impact on glass properties.
This review demonstrates that today, the synthesis of nanostructured PCG-fibers is still a challenging task. Different methods of the PCG-fibers’ fabrication are considered. It is shown that nanostructured fibers, with the compositions close to SiO2 glass, can be obtained by modification of the common MCVD process. At the same time, other fiber drawing techniques like rod-in-tube, melt-in-tube, or double crucible methods allow one to broaden the possible chemical composition spectrum and provide extensive control of the formation of the nanoparticles. Recent advances show that, in many cases, additional processing steps during the fiber drawing change the properties of the particles present in the material—being in most cases a negative effect, leading, for example, to extensive crystallization of the fiber and high scattering losses; sometimes, it can be also used as a benefit, making it possible to synthesize the nanoparticles in situ or modify the particle size and shape during the drawing step.
Even though in many cases PCG-fibers still require significant improvement in terms of the optical quality, it has been shown these fibers can possess unique optoelectronic characteristics, which could be useful for many practical applications, such as lasing, optical communications, medicine, lighting, sensing, and others. Further development of the nanostructured fibers requires a search of novel chemical formulations, cutting-edge fabrication, and characterization techniques and a fundamental understanding of the theoretical and technological problems. Nevertheless, the potential benefits of using these unique materials for everyday life, science, and industry are clearly worth the trouble of investigating nanostructured PCG-fibers.

Author Contributions

This article has been written by the following authors. A.V.: MeNP-doped glasses and fibers; L.P.: glass-ceramic materials; Z.L., M.V., F.P., and W.B.: phase-separated glasses and fibers. All authors are aware of its content and approved its submission.


A.V. and L.P. would like to thank the Academy of Finland (Flagship Programme, Photonics Research and Innovation (PREIN-320165) and Academy Project Numbers 326418, 316483) for funding of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Stookey, S.D. Method of Making Ceramics and Product Thereof. U.S. Patent 2920971, 12 January 1960. [Google Scholar]
  2. Deubener, J.; Allix, M.; Davis, M.J.; Duran, A.; Höche, T.; Honma, T.; Komatsu, T.; Krüger, S.; Mitra, I.; Müller, R.; et al. Updated definition of glass-ceramics. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2018, 501, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Beall, G.H.; Duke, D.A. Transparent glass-ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. 1969, 4, 340–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Herczog, A. Phase Distribution and Transparency in Glass-Ceramics Based on a Study of the Sodium Niobate-Silica System. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1990, 73, 2743–2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kokubo, T.; Tashiro, M. Dielectric properties of fine-grained PbTiO3 crystals precipitated in a glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1974, 13, 328–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Layton, M.M.; Smith, J.W. Pyroelectric Response in Transparent Ferroelectric Glass-Ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1975, 58, 435–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fang, Z.; Zheng, S.; Peng, W.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Z.; Zhou, S.; Chen, D.; Qiu, J. Fabrication and Characterization of Glass-Ceramic Fiber-Containing Cr3+-Doped ZnAl2O4 Nanocrystals. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 98, 2772–2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Auzel, F.; Pecile, D.; Morin, D. Rare Earth Doped Vitroceramics: New, Efficient, Blue and Green Emitting Materials for Infrared Up-Conversion. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1975, 122, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.; Ohwaki, J. New transparent vitroceramics codoped with Er3+ and Yb3+ for efficient frequency upconversion. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1993, 63, 3268–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Creig, J.W. Immiscibility in silicate melts; Part II. Am. J. Sci. 1927, 13, 133–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Turner, W.E.S.; Winks, F. The influence of boric oxide on the properties of chemical and heat-resisting glasses. Part II. The resistance to chemical reagents. J. Soc. Glass Technol. 1926, 10, 102–113. [Google Scholar]
  12. Beall, G.H.; Pinckney, L.R. Nanophase Glass-Ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 82, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, D.; Wan, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, P.; Zhong, J.; Ding, M.; Xiang, W.; Liang, X.; Ji, Z. Bulk glass ceramics containing Yb3+/Er3+: β-NaGdF4 nanocrystals: Phase-separation-controlled crystallization, optical spectroscopy and upconverted temperature sensing behavior. J. Alloys. Compd. 2015, 638, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Höland, W.; Rheinberger, V.; Schweiger, M. Control of nucleation in glass ceramics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 2003, 361, 575–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Minot, M.J. Single-layer, gradient refractive index antireflection films effective from 0.35 to 2.5 µ. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1976, 66, 515–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Inoue, S.; Makishima, A.; Inoue, H.; Soga, K.; Konishi, T.; Asano, T. An approach to new glasses through phase separation. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1999, 247, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chiang, C.-C.; Shyu, J.-J. Compositional Dependence of Phase Separation and Photoluminescence in Er-Doped Alkaline Borosilicate Glasses. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92, 2590–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fang, Z.; Chen, Z.; Peng, W.; Shao, C.; Zheng, S.; Hu, L.; Qiu, J.; Guan, B.-O. Phase-Separation Engineering of Glass for Drastic Enhancement of Upconversion Luminescence. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1801572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Drexhage, K.H. Influence of a dielectric interface on fluorescence decay time. J. Lumin. 1970, 1–2, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Da Silva, D.M.; Kassab, L.R.P.; Lüthi, S.R.; de Araújo, C.B.; Gomes, A.S.L.; Bell, M.J.V. Frequency upconversion in Er3+ doped PbO–GeO2 glasses containing metallic nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 081913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hayakawa, T.; Tamil Selvan, S.; Nogami, M. Enhanced fluorescence from Eu3+ owing to surface plasma oscillation of silver particles in glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1999, 259, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kassab, L.R.P.; de Araújo, C.B.; Kobayashi, R.A.; de Almeida Pinto, R.; da Silva, D.M. Influence of silver nanoparticles in the luminescence efficiency of Pr3+-doped tellurite glasses. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 102, 103515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De Almeida, R.; da Silva, D.M.; Kassab, L.R.P.; de Araújo, C.B. Eu3+ luminescence in tellurite glasses with gold nanostructures. Opt. Commun. 2008, 281, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Awang, A.; Ghoshal, S.K.; Sahar, M.R.; Arifin, R.; Nawaz, F. Non-spherical gold nanoparticles mediated surface plasmon resonance in Er3+ doped zinc–sodium tellurite glasses: Role of heat treatment. J. Lumin. 2014, 149, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fares, H.; Elhouichet, H.; Gelloz, B.; Férid, M. Surface plasmon resonance induced Er3+ photoluminescence enhancement in tellurite glass. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 193102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fukushima, M.; Managaki, N.; Fujii, M.; Yanagi, H.; Hayashi, S. Enhancement of 1.54-μm emission from Er-doped sol-gel SiO2 films by Au nanoparticles doping. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 024316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kassab, L.R.P.; Bomfim, F.A.; Martinelli, J.R.; Wetter, N.U.; Neto, J.J.; de Araújo, C.B. Energy transfer and frequency upconversion in Yb3+–Er3+-doped PbO-GeO2 glass containing silver nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. B 2009, 94, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Campion, A.; Gallo, A.R.; Harris, C.B.; Robota, H.J.; Whitmore, P.M. Electronic energy transfer to metal surfaces: A test of classical image dipole theory at short distances. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1980, 73, 447–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ribeiro, T.; Baleizão, C.; Farinha, J.P.S. Artefact-free Evaluation of Metal Enhanced Fluorescence in Silica Coated Gold Nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ray, K.; Badugu, R.; Lakowicz, J.R. Distance-Dependent Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence from Langmuir−Blodgett Monolayers of Alkyl-NBD Derivatives on Silver Island Films. Langmuir 2006, 22, 8374–8378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dragan, A.I.; Bishop, E.S.; Casas-Finet, J.R.; Strouse, R.J.; McGivney, J.; Schenerman, M.A.; Geddes, C.D. Distance Dependence of Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence. Plasmonics 2012, 7, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mishra, H.; Mali, B.L.; Karolin, J.; Dragan, A.I.; Geddes, C.D. Experimental and theoretical study of the distance dependence of metal-enhanced fluorescence, phosphorescence and delayed fluorescence in a single system. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 19538–19544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Amos, R.M.; Barnes, W.L. Modification of the spontaneous emission rate of Eu3+ ions close to a thin metal mirror. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 55, 7249–7254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Geddes, C.D.; Lakowicz, J.R. Editorial: Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence. J. Fluoresc. 2002, 12, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zenin, V.A.; Andryieuski, A.; Malureanu, R.; Radko, I.P.; Volkov, V.S.; Gramotnev, D.K.; Lavrinenko, A.V.; Bozhevolnyi, S.I. Boosting Local Field Enhancement by on-Chip Nanofocusing and Impedance-Matched Plasmonic Antennas. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 8148–8154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  36. Lakowicz, J.R.; Ray, K.; Chowdhury, M.; Szmacinski, H.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Nowaczyk, K. Plasmon-controlled fluorescence: A new paradigm in fluorescence spectroscopy. Analyst 2008, 133, 1308–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  37. Lakowicz, J.R. Radiative decay engineering 5: Metal-enhanced fluorescence and plasmon emission. Anal. Biochem. 2005, 337, 171–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Barnes, W.L. Fluorescence near interfaces: The role of photonic mode density. J. Mod. Opt. 1998, 45, 661–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pillonnet, A.; Berthelot, A.; Pereira, A.; Benamara, O.; Derom, S.; Colas des Francs, G.; Jurdyc, A.-M. Coupling distance between Eu3+ emitters and Ag nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 153115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. McFarland, A.D.; Young, M.A.; Dieringer, J.A.; Van Duyne, R.P. Wavelength-Scanned Surface-Enhanced Raman Excitation Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 11279–11285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, J.; Lin, W.; Cao, E.; Xu, X.; Liang, W.; Zhang, X. Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors on Raman and Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Sensors 2017, 17, 2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  42. Larsson, E.M.; Alegret, J.; Käll, M.; Sutherland, D.S. Sensing Characteristics of NIR Localized Surface Plasmon Resonances in Gold Nanorings for Application as Ultrasensitive Biosensors. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 1256–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chang, C.-Y.; Lin, H.-T.; Lai, M.-S.; Shieh, T.-Y.; Peng, C.-C.; Shih, M.-H.; Tung, Y.-C. Flexible Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor with Metal–Insulator–Metal Nanodisks on PDMS Substrate. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Willets, K.A.; Van Duyne, R.P. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy and Sensing. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2007, 58, 267–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  45. Ricard, D.; Roussignol, P.; Flytzanis, C. Surface-mediated enhancement of optical phase conjugation in metal colloids. Opt. Lett. 1985, 10, 511–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sasai, J.; Hirao, K. Relaxation behavior of nonlinear optical response in borate glasses containing gold nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 89, 4548–4553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  47. De Pablos-Martín, A.; Hémono, N.; Mather, G.C.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Höche, T.; Bornhöft, H.; Deubener, J.; Muñoz, F.; Durán, A.; Pascual, M.J. Crystallization Kinetics of LaF3 Nanocrystals in an Oxyfluoride Glass. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 94, 2420–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, H.; McIntyre, P.C. Spinodal decomposition in amorphous metal–silicate thin films: Phase diagram analysis and interface effects on kinetics. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 92, 5094–5102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yoshimura, M.; Kaneko, M.; Somiya, S. Preparation of amorphous materials by rapid quenching of melts in the system ZrO2-SiO2-AI2O3. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1985, 4, 1082–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Biswas, A.; Maciel, G.S.; Friend, C.S.; Prasad, P.N. Upconversion properties of a transparent Er3+–Yb3+ co-doped LaF3–SiO2 glass-ceramics prepared by sol–gel method. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2003, 316, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nogami, M. Glass preparation of the ZrO2-SiO2 system by the sol-gel process from metal alkoxides. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1985, 69, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bansal, N.P. Sol-Gel Synthesis of Magnesium Oxide-Silicon Dioxide Glass Compositions. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1988, 71, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Höland, W.; Beall, G.H. Glass-Ceramic Technology, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New Jersey, NJ, USA, 2012; ISBN 978-0-470-48787-7. [Google Scholar]
  54. McMillan, P.W. Glass-Ceramics; Non-metallic solids; Academic Press: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1964; Volume 1, ISBN 0-12-485650-0. [Google Scholar]
  55. Tashiro, M. Chemical Compositions of Glass-Ceramics. Glass Ind. 1966, 366–373, 428–435. [Google Scholar]
  56. Neuville, D.R.; Cornier, L.; Caurant, D.; Montagne, L. From Glass to Crystal; EDP SCIENCES: Les Ulis, France, 2017; ISBN 978-2-7598-1783-2. [Google Scholar]
  57. James, P.F. Liquid-phase separation in glass-forming systems. J. Mater. Sci. 1975, 10, 1802–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shaw, R.R.; Uhlmann, D.R. Subliquidus Immiscibility in Binary Alkali Borates. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1968, 51, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Charles, R.J.; Wagstaff, F.E. Metastable Immiscibility in the B2O3-SiO2 System. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1968, 51, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Charles, R.J. Metastable Liquid Immiscibility in Alkali Metal Oxide–Silica Systems. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1966, 49, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kozhukharov, V.; Marinov, M.; Gugov, I.; Bürger, H.; Vogel, W. A new family of tellurite glasses. J. Mater. Sci. 1983, 18, 1557–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bürger, H.; Vogel, W.; Kozhukharov, V.; Marinov, M. Phase equilibrium, glass-forming, properties and structure of glasses in the TeO2-B2O3 system. J. Mater. Sci. 1984, 19, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Craievich, A.F.; Zanotto, E.E.; James, P.F. Kinetics of sub-liquidus phase separation in silicate and borate glasses. A review. Bull. Minéral. 1983, 106, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yang, X.C.; Li, L.L.; Huang, M.; Zhao, J.F.; Hou, J.W. In situ synthesis of Ag–Cu bimetallic nanoparticles in silicate glass by a two-step ion-exchange route. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2011, 357, 2306–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yang, X.-C.; Dong, Z.-W.; Liu, H.-X.; Xu, J.-X.; Qian, S.-X. Effects of thermal treatment on the third-order optical nonlinearity and ultrafast dynamics of Ag nanoparticles embedded in silicate glasses. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009, 475, 256–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yang, X.C.; Dubiel, M.; Brunsch, S.; Hofmeister, H. X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis of formation and structure of Ag nanoparticles in soda-lime silicate glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2003, 328, 123–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kracker, M.; Thieme, C.; Thieme, K.; Patzig, C.; Berthold, L.; Höche, T.; Rüssel, C. Redox effects and formation of gold nanoparticles for the nucleation of low thermal expansion phases from BaO/SrO/ZnO/SiO2 glasses. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 6267–6277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  68. Bidault, X.; Chaussedent, S.; Blanc, W. A simple transferable adaptive potential to study phase separation in large-scale xMgO-(1-x)SiO2 binary glasses. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 154501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Cavillon, M.; Dragic, P.; Greenberg, B.; Garofalini, S.H.; Ballato, J. Observation and practical implications of nano-scale phase separation in aluminosilicate glass optical fibers. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 102, 879–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cavillon, M.; Faugas, B.; Zhao, J.; Kucera, C.; Kukuoz, B.; Dragic, P.; Qiao, X.; Du, J.; Ballato, J. Investigation of the structural environment and chemical bonding of fluorine in Yb-doped fluorosilicate glass optical fibres. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2019, 128, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, X.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, S.; Yue, Y.; Qiu, J. Transparent glass-ceramics functionalized by dispersed crystals. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 97, 38–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zanotto, E.D.; Fokin, V.M. Recent studies of internal and surface nucleation in silicate glasses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 2003, 361, 591–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  73. Arnold, G.W.; Borders, J.A. Aggregation and migration of ion-implanted silver in lithia-alumina-silica glass. J. Appl. Phys. 1977, 48, 1488–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Arnold, G.W. Near-surface nucleation and crystallization of an ion-implanted lithia-alumina-silica glass. J. Appl. Phys. 1975, 46, 4466–4473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Fukumi, K.; Chayahara, A.; Kadono, K.; Sakaguchi, T.; Horino, Y.; Miya, M.; Fujii, K.; Hayakawa, J.; Satou, M. Gold nanoparticles ion implanted in glass with enhanced nonlinear optical properties. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 75, 3075–3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kishimoto, N.; Gritsyna, V.T.; Kono, K.; Amekura, H.; Saito, T. Negative copper ion implantation into silica glasses at high dose rates and the optical measurements. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 1997, 127–128, 579–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gonella, F. Nanoparticle formation in silicate glasses by ion-beam-based methods. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2000, 166–167, 831–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Amekura, H.; Kitazawa, H.; Umeda, N.; Takeda, Y.; Kishimoto, N. Nickel nanoparticles in silica glass fabricated by 60 keV negative-ion implantation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2004, 222, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gonella, F.; Mattei, G.; Mazzoldi, P.; Sada, C.; Battaglin, G.; Cattaruzza, E. Au–Cu alloy nanoclusters in silica formed by ion implantation and annealing in reducing or oxidizing atmosphere. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 75, 55–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hofmeister, H.; Thiel, S.; Dubiel, M.; Schurig, E. Synthesis of nanosized silver particles in ion-exchanged glass by electron beam irradiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1997, 70, 1694–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  81. Qiu, J.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, C.; Shirai, M.; Si, J.; Jiang, N.; Hirao, K. Manipulation of Gold Nanoparticles inside Transparent Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2230–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sigaev, V.N.; Alieva, E.A.; Lotarev, S.V.; Lepekhin, N.M.; Priseko, Yu. S.; Rasstanaev, A.V. Local crystallization of glasses in the La2O3-B2O3-GeO2 system under laser irradiation. Glass Phys. Chem. 2009, 35, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jiang, N.; Wu, B.; Qiu, J.; Spence, J.C.H. Precipitation of nanocrystals in glasses by electron irradiation: An alternative path to form glass ceramics? Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 161909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Liu, S.J.; Zhang, Y.F.; He, W.; Yue, Y.Z. Transparent phosphosilicate glasses containing crystals formed during cooling of melts. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2011, 357, 3897–3900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  85. Liu, S.; Shan, Z.; Fu, G.; Yue, Y. Influence of rare earth oxides on the non-isothermal crystallization of phosphosilicate melts during cooling. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2014, 385, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nakanishi, T.; Tanabe, S. Preparation and luminescent properties of Eu2+-activated glass ceramic phosphor precipitated with β-Ca2SiO4 and Ca3Si2O7. Phys. Status Solidi A 2009, 206, 919–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lee, Y.K.; Lee, J.S.; Heo, J.; Im, W.B.; Chung, W.J. Phosphor in glasses with Pb-free silicate glass powders as robust color-converting materials for white LED applications. Opt. Lett. 2012, 37, 3276–3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Karaksina, E.V.; Shiryaev, V.S.; Ketkova, L.A. Preparation of composite materials for fiber optics based on chalcogenide glasses containing ZnS(ZnSe):Cr(2+) crystals. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2013, 377, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Dragic, P.D.; Cavillon, M.; Ballato, J. Materials for optical fiber lasers: A review. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2018, 5, 041301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  90. Gajc, M.; Surma, H.B.; Klos, A.; Sadecka, K.; Orlinski, K.; Nikolaenko, A.E.; Zdunek, K.; Pawlak, D.A. Nanoparticle Direct Doping: Novel Method for Manufacturing Three-Dimensional Bulk Plasmonic Nanocomposites. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 3443–3451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Massera, J.; Głuchowski, P.; Lastusaari, M.; Rodrigues, L.C.V.; Petit, L.; Hölsä, J.; Hupa, L.; Hupa, M. New alternative route for the preparation of phosphate glasses with persistent luminescence properties. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 35, 1255–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Massera, J.; Petit, L.; Koponen, J.; Glorieux, B.; Hupa, L.; Hupa, M. Er3+–Al2O3 nanoparticles doping of borosilicate glass. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2015, 38, 1407–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  93. Henderson, M.R.; Gibson, B.C.; Ebendorff-Heidepriem, H.; Kuan, K.; Afshar, V.S.; Orwa, J.O.; Aharonovich, I.; Tomljenovic-Hanic, S.; Greentree, A.D.; Prawer, S.; et al. Diamond in Tellurite Glass: A New Medium for Quantum Information. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2806–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhao, J.; Zheng, X.; Schartner, E.P.; Ionescu, P.; Zhang, R.; Nguyen, T.-L.; Jin, D.; Ebendorff-Heidepriem, H. Upconversion Nanocrystal-Doped Glass: A New Paradigm for Photonic Materials. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2016, 4, 1507–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  95. Ojha, N.; Nguyen, H.; Laihinen, T.; Salminen, T.; Lastusaari, M.; Petit, L. Decomposition of persistent luminescent microparticles in corrosive phosphate glass melt. Corros. Sci. 2018, 135, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ojha, N.; Laihinen, T.; Salminen, T.; Lastusaari, M.; Petit, L. Influence of the phosphate glass melt on the corrosion of functional particles occurring during the preparation of glass-ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 11807–11811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Scherrer, P. Bestimmung der Größe und der inneren Struktur von Kolloidteilchen mittels Röntgenstrahlen. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 1918, 1918, 98–100. [Google Scholar]
  98. Toporski, J.; Dieing, T.; Hollricher, O. Confocal Raman Microscopy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; ISBN 978-3-319-75380-5. [Google Scholar]
  99. Zavalin, A.; Cricenti, A.; Generosi, R.; Luce, M.; Morgan, S.; Piston, D. Nano-Raman mapping of a porous glass-ceramic SERS substrate in collection mode. J. Microsc. 2008, 229, 402–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Morea, R.; Fernandez, T.T.; Miguel, A.; Hernandez, M.; Ulloa, J.M.; Fernandez, J.; Balda, R.; Solís, J.; Gonzalo, J. 2.18 μm Mid IR emission from highly transparent Er3+ doped tellurite glass ceramic for bio applications. In CLEO: 2014; OSA: San Jose, CA, USA, 2014; p. JTu4A.101. [Google Scholar]
  101. Hodroj, A.; Simon, P.; Florian, P.; Chopinet, M.-H.; Vaills, Y. Phase Separation and Spatial Morphology in Sodium Silicate Glasses by AFM, Light Scattering and NMR. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2013, 96, 2454–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Andrikopoulos, K.S.; Arvanitidis, J.; Dracopoulos, V.; Christofilos, D.; Wagner, T.; Yannopoulos, S.N. Nanoindentation and Raman studies of phase-separated Ag-As-S glasses. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 171911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. White, W.B. Investigaton of phase separation by Raman spectroscopy. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1982, 49, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Isogai, M.; Veber, A.; Cicconi, M.R.; Hayakawa, T.; De Ligny, D. Devitrification Behavior of Sol-Gel Derived ZrO2-SiO2 Rare-Earth Doped Glasses: Correlation between Structural and Optical Properties. Ceramics 2018, 1, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  105. Augustyn, E.; Żelechower, M.; Stróż, D.; Chrapoński, J. The microstructure of erbium–ytterbium co-doped oxyfluoride glass–ceramic optical fibers. Opt. Mater. 2012, 34, 944–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Dargaud, O.; Cormier, L.; Menguy, N.; Patriarche, G. Multi-scale structuration of glasses: Observations of phase separation and nanoscale heterogeneities in glasses by Z-contrast scanning electron transmission microscopy. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2012, 358, 1257–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Heinz, M.; Srabionyan, V.V.; Bugaev, A.L.; Pryadchenko, V.V.; Ishenko, E.V.; Avakyan, L.A.; Zubavichus, Y.V.; Ihlemann, J.; Meinertz, J.; Pippel, E.; et al. Formation of silver nanoparticles in silicate glass using excimer laser radiation: Structural characterization by HRTEM, XRD, EXAFS and optical absorption spectra. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 681, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Gorni, G.; Velázquez, J.; Mosa, J.; Balda, R.; Fernández, J.; Durán, A.; Castro, Y. Transparent Glass-Ceramics Produced by Sol-Gel: A Suitable Alternative for Photonic Materials. Materials 2018, 11, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  109. Wang, L.; Mei, L.; He, G.; Li, J.; Xu, L. Preparation of Ce:YAG Glass-Ceramics with Low SiO2. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 94, 3800–3803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Pontuschka, W.M.; Giehl, J.M.; Miranda, A.R.; Da Costa, Z.M.; Alencar, A.M. Effect of the Al2O3 addition on the formation of silver nanoparticles in heat treated soda-lime silicate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2016, 453, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Elmer, T.H.; Nordberg, M.E.; Carrier, G.B.; Korda, E.J. Phase Separation in Borosilicate Glasses as Seen by Electron Microscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1970, 53, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Lopez-Iscoa, P.; Salminen, T.; Hakkarainen, T.; Petit, L.; Janner, D.; Boetti, N.G.; Lastusaari, M.; Pugliese, D.; Paturi, P.; Milanese, D. Effect of Partial Crystallization on the Structural and Luminescence Properties of Er3+-Doped Phosphate Glasses. Materials 2017, 10, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  113. Gorni, G.; Velázquez, J.; Mosa, J.; Mather, G.; Serrano, A.; Vila, M.; Castro, G.; Bravo, D.; Balda, R.; Fernández, J.; et al. Transparent Sol-Gel Oxyfluoride Glass-Ceramics with High Crystalline Fraction and Study of RE Incorporation. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  114. Kim, Y.H.; Lee, B.H.; Chung, Y.; Paek, U.C.; Han, W.-T. Resonant optical nonlinearity measurement of Yb3+/Al3+ codoped optical fibers by use of a long-period fiber grating pair. Opt. Lett. 2002, 27, 580–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Cicconi, M.R.; Giuli, G.; Paris, E.; Courtial, P.; Dingwell, D.B. XAS investigation of rare earth elements in sodium disilicate glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2013, 362, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Cicconi, M.R.; Neuville, D.R.; Tannou, I.; Baudelet, F.; Floury, P.; Paris, E.; Giuli, G. Competition between two redox states in silicate melts: An in-situ experiment at the Fe K-edge and Eu L3-edge. Am. Mineral. 2015, 100, 1013–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Cicconi, M.R.; Giuli, G.; Paris, E.; Dingwell, D.B. Europium structural environment in a sodium disilicate glass by XAS. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2010, 356, 1749–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Oppo, C.I.; Corpino, R.; Ricci, P.C.; Paul, M.C.; Das, S.; Pal, M.; Bhadra, S.K.; Yoo, S.; Kalita, M.P.; Boyland, A.J.; et al. Incorporation of Yb3+ ions in multicomponent phase-separated fibre glass preforms. Opt. Mater. 2012, 34, 660–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wiedenmann, A.; Lembke, U.; Hoell, A.; Müller, R.; Schüppel, W. Magnetic nanostructures in a glass ceramic charcterized by small angle neutron scattering. Nanostruct. Mater. 1999, 12, 601–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Haug, J.; Kruth, H.; Dubiel, M.; Hofmeister, H.; Haas, S.; Tatchev, D.; Hoell, A. ASAXS study on the formation of core–shell Ag/Au nanoparticles in glass. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 505705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Höhr, A.; Neumann, H.-B.; Schmidt, P.W.; Pfeifer, P.; Avnir, D. Fractal surface and cluster structure of controlled-pore glasses and Vycor porous glass as revealed by small-angle x-ray and neutron scattering. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 38, 1462–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Blanc, W.; Guillermier, C.; Dussardier, B. Composition of nanoparticles in optical fibers by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry. Opt. Mater. Express 2012, 2, 1504–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Blanc, W.; Martin, I.; Francois-Saint-Cyr, H.; Bidault, X.; Chaussedent, S.; Hombourger, C.; Lacomme, S.; Le Coustumer, P.; Neuville, D.R.; Larson, D.J.; et al. Compositional Changes at the Early Stages of Nanoparticles Growth in Glasses. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Hopper, R.W. Stochastic theory of scattering from idealized spinodal structures: II. Scattering in general and for the basic late stage model. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1985, 70, 111–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Tick, P.A. Are low-loss glass–ceramic optical waveguides possible? Opt. Lett. 1998, 23, 1904–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Tick, P.A.; Borrelli, N.F.; Reaney, I.M. The relationship between structure and transparency in glass-ceramic materials. Opt. Mater. 2000, 15, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Mosk, A.P.; Lagendijk, A.; Lerosey, G.; Fink, M. Controlling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  128. Jeong, S.; Lee, Y.-R.; Choi, W.; Kang, S.; Hong, J.H.; Park, J.-S.; Lim, Y.-S.; Park, H.-G.; Choi, W. Focusing of light energy inside a scattering medium by controlling the time-gated multiple light scattering. Nat. Photonics 2018, 12, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  129. De Matos, C.J.S.; Menezes, L.; Brito-Silva, A.M.; Gámez, M.M.; Gomes, A.S.; de Araújo, C.B. Random Fiber Laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 153903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Hu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Miao, B.; Fu, Q.; Zou, G.; Chen, Y.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, D.; Wang, P.; Ming, H.; et al. Coherent Random Fiber Laser Based on Nanoparticles Scattering in the Extremely Weakly Scattering Regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 253901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Turitsyn, S.K.; Babin, S.A.; El-Taher, A.E.; Harper, P.; Churkin, D.V.; Kablukov, S.I.; Ania-Castañón, J.D.; Karalekas, V.; Podivilov, E.V. Random distributed feedback fibre laser. Nat. Photonics 2010, 4, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Churkin, D.V.; Sugavanam, S.; Vatnik, I.D.; Wang, Z.; Podivilov, E.V.; Babin, S.A.; Rao, Y.; Turitsyn, S.K. Recent advances in fundamentals and applications of random fiber lasers. Adv. Opt. Photonics 2015, 7, 516–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Segev, M.; Silberberg, Y.; Christodoulides, D.N. Anderson localization of light. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Mafi, A. Transverse Anderson localization of light: A tutorial. Adv. Opt. Photonics 2015, 7, 459–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Karbasi, S.; Frazier, R.J.; Koch, K.W.; Hawkins, T.; Ballato, J.; Mafi, A. Image transport through a disordered optical fibre mediated by transverse Anderson localization. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Mafi, A.; Tuggle, M.; Bassett, C.; Mobini, E.; Ballato, J. Advances in the fabrication of disordered transverse Anderson localizing optical fibers. Opt. Mater. Express 2019, 9, 2769–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Bigot, L.; Hamzaoui, H.E.; Chassagneux, F.; Capoen, B.; Bouazaoui, M. Linear and nonlinear optical properties of gold nanoparticle-doped photonic crystal fiber. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 19061–19066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. MacChesney, J.B.; O’Connor, P.B.; Presby, H.M. A new technique for the preparation of low-loss and graded-index optical fibers. Proc. IEEE 1974, 62, 1280–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Unger, S.; Lindner, F.; Aichele, C.; Schuster, K. Rare-Earth-Doped Laser Fiber Fabrication Using Vapor Deposition Technique. In Handbook of Optical Fibers; Peng, G.-D., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 1–20. ISBN 978-981-10-1477-2. [Google Scholar]
  140. Townsend, J.E.; Poole, S.B.; Payne, D.N. Solution-doping technique for fabrication of rare-earth-doped optical fibres. Electron. Lett. 1987, 23, 329–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  141. Yoo, S.; Paek, U.-C.; Han, W.-T. Development of a glass optical fiber containing ZnO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramics doped with Co2+ and its optical absorption characteristics. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2003, 315, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Blanc, W.; Dussardier, B. Formation and applications of nanoparticles in silica optical fibers. J. Opt. 2016, 45, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  143. Fang, Z.; Zheng, S.; Peng, W.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Z.; Dong, G.; Zhou, S.; Chen, D.; Qiu, J. Ni2+ doped glass ceramic fiber fabricated by melt-in-tube method and successive heat treatment. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 28258–28263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Kuznetsov, A.S.; Cuong, N.T.; Tikhomirov, V.K.; Jivanescu, M.; Stesmans, A.; Chibotaru, L.F.; Velázquez, J.J.; Rodríguez, V.D.; Kirilenko, D.; Van Tendeloo, G.; et al. Effect of heat-treatment on luminescence and structure of Ag nanoclusters doped oxyfluoride glasses and implication for fiber drawing. Opt. Mater. 2012, 34, 616–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  145. Cheng, S.-F.; Chau, L.-K. Colloidal Gold-Modified Optical Fiber for Chemical and Biochemical Sensing. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Csaki, A.; Jahn, F.; Latka, I.; Henkel, T.; Malsch, D.; Schneider, T.; Schröder, K.; Schuster, K.; Schwuchow, A.; Spittel, R.; et al. Nanoparticle Layer Deposition for Plasmonic Tuning of Microstructured Optical Fibers. Small 2010, 6, 2584–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  147. Guo, H.; Feng, M.; Song, F.; Li, H.; Ren, A.; Wei, X.; Li, Y.; Xu, X.; Tian, J. Q-Switched Erbium-Doped Fiber Laser Based on Silver Nanoparticles as a Saturable Absorber. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2016, 28, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Dhawan, A.; Muth, J.F. Plasmon resonances of gold nanoparticles incorporated inside an optical fibre matrix. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 2504–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Zheng, H.; Hu, Y.; Mackenzie, J.D. Continuous drawing of Bi-Ca-Sr-Cu-O glass fibers from a preform. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1991, 58, 1679–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Hu, Y.; Zheng, H.; Mackenzie, J.D. High-Tc superconducting Bi(Al)-Ca-Sr-Cu-O glass-ceramic fibres drawn from glass preforms. J. Mater. Sci. 1995, 30, 3913–3918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Samson, B.N.; Tick, P.A.; Borrelli, N.F. Efficient neodymium-doped glass-ceramic fiber laser and amplifier. Opt. Lett. 2001, 26, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Downey, K.E.; Samson, B.N.; Beall, G.H.; Mozdy, E.J.; Pinckney, L.R.; Borrelli, N.F.; Mayolet, A.; Mayolet, A.; Kerdoncuff, A.; Kerdoncuff, A.; et al. Cr4+:forsterite nanocrystalline glass-ceramic fiber. In Proceedings of the Conference on 2001 Lasers and Electro-Optics, Baltimore, MD, USA, 6–10 May 2001; p. CTuP1. [Google Scholar]
  153. Samson, B.N.; Pinckney, L.R.; Wang, J.; Beall, G.H.; Borrelli, N.F. Nickel-doped nanocrystalline glass-ceramic fiber. Opt. Lett. 2002, 27, 1309–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Fang, Z.; Xiao, X.; Wang, X.; Ma, Z.; Lewis, E.; Farrell, G.; Wang, P.; Ren, J.; Guo, H.; Qiu, J. Glass-ceramic optical fiber containing Ba2TiSi2O8 nanocrystals for frequency conversion of lasers. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sakamoto, A.; Yamamoto, S. Fabrication of Li2O-Al2O3-SiO2 glass-ceramic ferrules by precision drawing of crystallized preforms. J. Mater. Sci. 2003, 38, 2305–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Sckerl, M.W.; Guldberg-Kjaer, S.; Rysholt Poulsen, M.; Shi, P.; Chevallier, J. Precipitate coarsening and self organization in erbium-doped silica. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 13494–13497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  157. Arai, K.; Namikawa, H.; Kumata, K.; Honda, T.; Ishii, Y.; Handa, T. Aluminum or phosphorus co-doping effects on the fluorescence and structural properties of neodymium-doped silica glass. J. Appl. Phys. 1986, 59, 3430–3436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Faure, B.; Blanc, W.; Dussardier, B.; Monnom, G. Improvement of the Tm3+:3H4 level lifetime in silica optical fibers by lowering the local phonon energy. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2007, 353, 2767–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  159. Tanabe, S. Rare-earth-doped glasses for fiber amplifiers in broadband telecommunication. Comptes Rendus Chimie 2002, 5, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Hewak, D.W.; Deol, R.S.; Wang, J.; Wylangowski, G.; Mederios Neto, J.A.; Samson, B.N.; Laming, R.I.; Brocklesby, W.S.; Payne, D.N.; Jha, A.; et al. Low phonon-energy glasses for efficient 1.3 μm optical fibre amplifiers. Electron. Lett. 1993, 29, 237–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  161. Durteste, Y.; Monerie, M.; Allain, J.Y.; Poignant, H. Amplification and lasing at 1.3 mu m in praseodymium-doped fluorozirconate fibres. Electron. Lett. 1991, 27, 626–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Ferrari, M.; Righini, G.C. Glass-Ceramic Materials for Guided-Wave Optics. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 2015, 6, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Fedorov, P.P.; Luginina, A.A.; Popov, A.I. Transparent oxyfluoride glass ceramics. J. Fluor. Chem. 2015, 172, 22–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Reben, M.; Dorosz, D.; Wasylak, J.; Burtan, E.; Jaglarz, J.; Zontek, J. Nd3+-doped oxyfluoride glass ceramics optical fibre with SrF2 nanocrystals. Opt. Appl. 2012, 42, 353–364. [Google Scholar]
  165. Gorni, G.; Balda, R.; Fernández, J.; Iparraguirre, I.; Velázquez, J.J.; Castro, Y.; Pascual, L.; Chen, G.; Sundararajan, M.; Pascual, M.J.; et al. Oxyfluoride glass–ceramic fibers doped with Nd3+: Structural and optical characterization. CrystEngComm 2017, 19, 6620–6629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Krishnaiah, K.V.; Ledemi, Y.; Genevois, C.; Veron, E.; Sauvage, X.; Morency, S.; Filho, E.S.d.L.; Nemova, G.; Allix, M.; Messaddeq, Y.; et al. Ytterbium-doped oxyfluoride nano-glass-ceramic fibers for laser cooling. Opt. Mater. Express 2017, 7, 1980–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Kang, S.; Fang, Z.; Huang, X.; Chen, Z.; Yang, D.; Xiao, X.; Qiu, J.; Dong, G. Precisely controllable fabrication of Er3+-doped glass ceramic fibers: Novel mid-infrared fiber laser materials. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 4549–4556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Afify, N.; Abdel-Rahim, M.A.; Abd El-Halim, A.S.; Hafiz, M.M. Kinetics study of non-isothermal crystallization in Se0.7Ge0.2Sb0.1 chalcogenide glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1991, 128, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Afify, N. Calorimetric study on the crystallization of a Se0.8Te0.2 chalcogenide glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1992, 142, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Černošková, E.; Ivanova, Z.G.; Pamukchieva, V. Crystallization kinetics of Ge10Sb30Se60 glass. Thermochim. Acta 1998, 316, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Vázquez, J.; López-Alemany, P.L.; Villares, P.; Jiménez-Garay, R. A study on non-isothermal transformation kinetics. Application to the crystallization of Sb0.20As0.32Se0.48 alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 1998, 270, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Cheng, J.; Tilloca, G.; Zarzycki, J. Mechanism of controlled crystallization of As-Ge-Se glasses nucleated by different nucleants. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1982, 52, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Ma, H.; Zhang, X.; Lucas, J. Infrared transmitting chalcogenide glass ceramics. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2003, 317, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. McCloy, J.S.; Riley, B.J.; Pierce, D.A. Infrared-transparent glass ceramics: An exploratory study. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2015, 410, 160–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  175. Zhang, X.; Ma, H.; Lucas, J.; Guimond, Y.; Kodjikian, S. Optical fibers and molded optics in infrared transparent glass-ceramic. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2004, 336, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Pastouret, A.; Gonnet, C.; Collet, C.; Cavani, O.; Burov, E.; Chaneac, C.; Carton, A.; Jolivet, J.P. Nanoparticle doping process for improved fibre amplifiers and lasers. In Proceedings of the SPIE LASE: Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering, San Jose, CA, USA, 2009; Gapontsev, D.V., Kliner, D.A., Dawson, J.W., Tankala, K., Eds.; p. 71951X. [Google Scholar]
  177. Podrazky, O.; Kasik, I.; Pospisilova, M.; Matejec, V. Use of alumina nanoparticles for preparation of erbium-doped fibers. In Proceedings of the LEOS 2007—IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society Annual Meeting Conference, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, 21–25 October 2007; pp. 246–247. [Google Scholar]
  178. Boivin, D.; Föhn, T.; Burov, E.; Pastouret, A.; Gonnet, C.; Cavani, O.; Collet, C.; Lempereur, S. Quenching Investigation on New Erbium Doped Fibers Using MCVD Nanoparticle Doping Process. In Proceedings of the SPIE LASE: Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2010; Tankala, K., Ed.; p. 75802B. [Google Scholar]
  179. Baker, C.C.; Friebele, E.J.; Burdett, A.A.; Rhonehouse, D.L.; Fontana, J.; Kim, W.; Bowman, S.R.; Shaw, L.B.; Sanghera, J.; Zhang, J.; et al. Nanoparticle doping for high power fiber lasers at eye-safer wavelengths. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 13903–13915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Cajzl, J.; Peterka, P.; Kowalczyk, M.; Tarka, J.; Sobon, G.; Sotor, J.; Aubrecht, J.; Honzátko, P.; Kašík, I. Thulium-Doped Silica Fibers with Enhanced Fluorescence Lifetime and Their Application in Ultrafast Fiber Lasers. Fibers 2018, 6, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  181. Mrazek, J.; Kasik, I.; Prochazkova, L.; Cuba, V.; Aubrecht, J.; Cajzl, J.; Podrazky, O.; Peterka, P.; Nikl, M. YAG ceramic nanocrystals implementation into MCVD technology of active optical fibers. Adv. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2015, 12, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  182. Kucera, C.; Kokuoz, B.; Edmondson, D.; Griese, D.; Miller, M.; James, A.; Baker, W.; Ballato, J. Designer emission spectra through tailored energy transfer in nanoparticle-doped silica preforms. Opt. Lett. 2009, 34, 2339–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Vermillac, M.; Fneich, H.; Lupi, J.-F.; Tissot, J.-B.; Kucera, C.; Vennéguès, P.; Mehdi, A.; Neuville, D.R.; Ballato, J.; Blanc, W. Use of thulium-doped LaF3 nanoparticles to lower the phonon energy of the thulium’s environment in silica-based optical fibres. Opt. Mater. 2017, 68, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Kasik, I.; Peterka, P.; Honzatko, J.M.; Silica, P. Optical Fibers Doped with Nanoparticles for Fiber Lasers and Broadband Sources. Curr. Nanosci. 2016, 12, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Blanc, W.; Mauroy, V.; Nguyen, L.; Bhaktha, B.N.S.; Sebbah, P.; Pal, B.P.; Dussardier, B. Fabrication of Rare Earth-Doped Transparent Glass Ceramic Optical Fibers by Modified Chemical Vapor Deposition. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 94, 2315–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  186. Blanc, W.; Dussardier, B.; Monnom, G.; Peretti, R.; Jurdyc, A.-M.; Jacquier, B.; Foret, M.; Roberts, A. Erbium emission properties in nanostructured fibers. Appl. Opt. 2009, 48, G119–G124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  187. Reddy, P.H.; Das, S.; Dutta, D.; Dhar, A.; Kir’yanov, A.V.; Pal, M.; Bhadra, S.K.; Paul, M.C. Luminescent Properties and Optical Amplification of Erbium-Doped Nano-Engineered Scandium-Phospho-Yttria-Alumina-Silica Glass Based Optical Fiber. Phys. Status Solidi A 2018, 215, 1700615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Blanc, W.; Mauroy, V.; Dussardier, B. Erbium-doped nanoparticles in silica-based optical fibres. Int. J. Nanotechnol. 2012, 9, 480–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  189. Vermillac, M.; Lupi, J.-F.; Trzesien, S.; Ude, M.; Blanc, W. On the Enlargement of the Emission Spectra from the 4I13/2 Level of Er3+ in Silica-Based Optical Fibers through Lanthanum or Magnesium Co-Doping. Ceramics 2018, 1, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  190. Blanc, W.; Dussardier, B.; Paul, M.C. Er doped oxide nanoparticles in silica based optical fibres. Glass Technol. Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. Part A 2009, 50, 79–81. [Google Scholar]
  191. Vermillac, M.; Fneich, H.; Turlier, J.; Cabié, M.; Kucera, C.; Borschneck, D.; Peters, F.; Vennéguès, P.; Neisius, T.; Chaussedent, S.; et al. On the morphologies of oxides particles in optical fibers: Effect of the drawing tension and composition. Opt. Mater. 2019, 87, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  192. Vermillac, M.; Lupi, J.-F.; Peters, F.; Cabié, M.; Vennéguès, P.; Kucera, C.; Neisius, T.; Ballato, J.; Blanc, W. Fiber-draw-induced elongation and break-up of particles inside the core of a silica-based optical fiber. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 100, 1814–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  193. Tandon, P.; Li, M.-J.; Bookbinder, D.C.; Logunov, S.L.; Fewkes, E.J. Nano-engineered optical fibers and applications1. Nanophotonics 2013, 2, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Bisyarin, M.A.; Eronyan, M.A.; Kulesh, A.Y.; Meshkovskiy, I.K.; Reutsky, A.A.; Shcheglov, A.A.; Ustinov, S.V. Light-emitting optical fibers with controllable anomalous small-angle scattering. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2017, 34, 2396–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Sypabekova, M.; Korganbayev, S.; Blanc, W.; Ayupova, T.; Bekmurzayeva, A.; Shaimerdenova, M.; Dukenbayev, K.; Molardi, C.; Tosi, D. Fiber optic refractive index sensors through spectral detection of Rayleigh backscattering in a chemically etched MgO-based nanoparticle-doped fiber. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 5945–5948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  196. Korganbayev, S.; Shaimerdenova, M.; Ayupova, T.; Sypabekova, M.; Bekmurzayeva, A.; Blanc, W.; Molardi, C.; Tosi, D. Refractive Index Sensor by Interrogation of Etched MgO Nanoparticle-Doped Optical Fiber Signature. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2019, 31, 1253–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Beisenova, A.; Issatayeva, A.; Sovetov, S.; Korganbayev, S.; Jelbuldina, M.; Ashikbayeva, Z.; Blanc, W.; Schena, E.; Sales, S.; Molardi, C.; et al. Multi-fiber distributed thermal profiling of minimally invasive thermal ablation with scattering-level multiplexing in MgO-doped fibers. Biomed. Opt. Express 2019, 10, 1282–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Beisenova, A.; Issatayeva, A.; Korganbayev, S.; Molardi, C.; Blanc, W.; Tosi, D. Simultaneous Distributed Sensing on Multiple MgO-Doped High Scattering Fibers by Means of Scattering-Level Multiplexing. J. Lightwave Technol. 2019, 37, 3413–3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Beisenova, A.; Issatayeva, A.; Iordachita, I.; Blanc, W.; Molardi, C.; Tosi, D. Distributed fiber optics 3D shape sensing by means of high scattering NP-doped fibers simultaneous spatial multiplexing. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 22074–22087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Ju, S.; Nguyen, V.L.; Watekar, P.R.; Kim, B.H.; Jeong, C.; Boo, S.; Kim, C.J.; Han, W.-T. Fabrication and Optical Characteristics of a Novel Optical Fiber Doped with the Au Nanoparticles. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2006, 6, 3555–3558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. De Oliveira, R.E.P.; Sjödin, N.; Fokine, M.; Margulis, W.; de Matos, C.J.S.; Norin, L. Fabrication and Optical Characterization of Silica Optical Fibers Containing Gold Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Lin, A.; Han, W.-T. Au-nanoparticle-incorporated germano-silicate glass fiber with high resonant nonlinearity. J. Nanophotonics 2007, 1, 013554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Lin, A.; Boo, S.; Moon, D.S.; Jeong, H.J.; Chung, Y.; Han, W.-T. Luminescence enhancement by Au nanoparticles in Er3+-doped germano-silicate optical fiber. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 8603–8608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  204. Lin, A.; Son, D.H.; Ahn, I.H.; Song, G.H.; Han, W.-T. Visible to infrared photoluminescence from gold nanoparticles embedded in germano-silicate glass fiber. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 6374–6379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Lin, A.; Kim, B.H.; Ju, S.; Han, W.-T. Fabrication and third-order nonlinearity of germano-silicate glass fiber incorporated with Au nanoparticles. In Quantum Dots, Particles, and Nanoclusters IV; International Society for Optics and Photonics: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2007; Volume 6481, p. 64810M. [Google Scholar]
  206. Watekar, P.R.; Ju, S.; Han, W.-T. Optical properties of the alumino-silicate glass doped with Er-ions/Au particles. Colloids Surf. A 2008, 313–314, 492–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Zlenko, A.S.; Mashinsky, V.M.; Iskhakova, L.D.; Semjonov, S.L.; Koltashev, V.V.; Karatun, N.M.; Dianov, E.M. Mechanisms of optical losses in Bi:SiO2 glass fibers. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 23186–23200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Jorgenson, R.C.; Yee, S.S. A fiber-optic chemical sensor based on surface plasmon resonance. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 1993, 12, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Tu, M.H.; Sun, T.; Grattan, K.T.V. Optimization of gold-nanoparticle-based optical fibre surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based sensors. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2012, 164, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Lin, H.-Y.; Huang, C.-H.; Cheng, G.-L.; Chen, N.-K.; Chui, H.-C. Tapered optical fiber sensor based on localized surface plasmon resonance. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 21693–21701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Hassani, A.; Skorobogatiy, M. Design of the microstructured optical fiber-based surface plasmon resonance sensors with enhanced microfluidics. Opt. Express 2006, 14, 11616–11621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  212. Ganeev, R.A.; Ryasnyansky, A.I.; Kamalov, S.R.; Kodirov, M.K.; Usmanov, T. Nonlinear susceptibilities, absorption coefficients and refractive indices of colloidal metals. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2001, 34, 1602–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Krenn, J.R.; Schider, G.; Rechberger, W.; Lamprecht, B.; Leitner, A.; Aussenegg, F.R.; Weeber, J.C. Design of multipolar plasmon excitations in silver nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 3379–3381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Gomes, A.S.L.; Filho, E.L.F.; de Araújo, C.B.; Rativa, D.; de Araujo, R.E.; Sakaguchi, K.; Mezzapesa, F.P.; Carvalho, I.C.S.; Kazansky, P.G. Third-order nonlinear optical properties of bismuth-borate glasses measured by conventional and thermally managed eclipse Z scan. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 033115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  215. Ju, S.; Watekar, P.R.; Kang, S.G.; Chung, J.-K.; Kim, C.J.; Han, W.-T. Effect of TEOS addition on formation of Au metal nano-particles in the Au-doped optical fiber and its optical nonlinearity. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2010, 356, 2578–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Lin, A.; Liu, X.; Watekar, P.R.; Chung, Y.; Han, W.-T. Ag nanocrystal-incorporated germano-silicate optical fiber with high resonant nonlinearity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 021901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  217. Lin, A.; Liu, X.; Watekar, P.R.; Zhao, W.; Peng, B.; Sun, C.; Wang, Y.; Han, W.-T. All-optical switching application of germano-silicate optical fiber incorporated with Ag nanocrystals. Opt. Lett. 2009, 34, 791–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) micrograph, (b) lattice distance, and (c) crystal-size distribution of 80SiO2–20LaF3 0.5Er3+ thin film treated at 550 °C for 1 min. Reproduced from [113], G. Gorni, J. Velázquez, J. Mosa, et al. “Transparent Sol-Gel Oxyfluoride Glass-Ceramics with High Crystalline Fraction and Study of RE Incorporation”, Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 530, CC BY 4.0. (d) FE-SEM images and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping of the cross-section of the GCs with compositions [0.25Er2O3−(0.5P2O5−0.4SrO−0.1Na2O)100-x−(TiO2/Al2O3/ZnO)x], x = 0 or 1.5. Reproduced from [112], P. Lopez-Iscoa, T. Salminen, T. Hakkarainen, et al. “Effect of Partial Crystallization on the Structural and Luminescence Properties of Er3+-Doped Phosphate Glasses”, Materials 2017, 10, 473, CC BY 4.0.
Figure 1. (a) High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) micrograph, (b) lattice distance, and (c) crystal-size distribution of 80SiO2–20LaF3 0.5Er3+ thin film treated at 550 °C for 1 min. Reproduced from [113], G. Gorni, J. Velázquez, J. Mosa, et al. “Transparent Sol-Gel Oxyfluoride Glass-Ceramics with High Crystalline Fraction and Study of RE Incorporation”, Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 530, CC BY 4.0. (d) FE-SEM images and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping of the cross-section of the GCs with compositions [0.25Er2O3−(0.5P2O5−0.4SrO−0.1Na2O)100-x−(TiO2/Al2O3/ZnO)x], x = 0 or 1.5. Reproduced from [112], P. Lopez-Iscoa, T. Salminen, T. Hakkarainen, et al. “Effect of Partial Crystallization on the Structural and Luminescence Properties of Er3+-Doped Phosphate Glasses”, Materials 2017, 10, 473, CC BY 4.0.
Fibers 07 00105 g001
Figure 2. Raman spectroscopy results: Distribution of different crystalline phases in sol-gel derived 30ZrO2-70SiO2: Tb, Yb glass-ceramics obtained from analysis of the Raman spectra (λex = 532 nm): a microscopic image of the investigated area (a); distribution of tetragonal ZrO2, (b) SiO2 cristobalite, (c) and Yb2Si2O7 (d) phases. Photoluminescence results: emission intensities of Tb3+ex = 488 nm (a), Yb3+ex = 780 nm, (c) and relative intensities of the emission peaks calculated as I (555 nm)/I (544 nm) for Tb3+ (b), I (966 nm)/I (973 nm) for Yb3+ excited under 780 nm (d). All the spectra were obtained using a confocal Raman microscope using different excitation lasers. Adapted from [104], M. Isogai, A. Veber, M. R. Cicconi, et al. “Devitrification Behavior of Sol-Gel Derived ZrO2-SiO2 Rare-Earth Doped Glasses: Correlation between Structural and Optical Properties”, Ceramics 2018, 1, 274–286. CC BY 4.0.
Figure 2. Raman spectroscopy results: Distribution of different crystalline phases in sol-gel derived 30ZrO2-70SiO2: Tb, Yb glass-ceramics obtained from analysis of the Raman spectra (λex = 532 nm): a microscopic image of the investigated area (a); distribution of tetragonal ZrO2, (b) SiO2 cristobalite, (c) and Yb2Si2O7 (d) phases. Photoluminescence results: emission intensities of Tb3+ex = 488 nm (a), Yb3+ex = 780 nm, (c) and relative intensities of the emission peaks calculated as I (555 nm)/I (544 nm) for Tb3+ (b), I (966 nm)/I (973 nm) for Yb3+ excited under 780 nm (d). All the spectra were obtained using a confocal Raman microscope using different excitation lasers. Adapted from [104], M. Isogai, A. Veber, M. R. Cicconi, et al. “Devitrification Behavior of Sol-Gel Derived ZrO2-SiO2 Rare-Earth Doped Glasses: Correlation between Structural and Optical Properties”, Ceramics 2018, 1, 274–286. CC BY 4.0.
Fibers 07 00105 g002
Figure 3. Principle of the preparation of the rare-earth-doped fiber by MCVD and solution doping method: (a) deposition, (b) solution doping, (c) collapsing, and (d) fiber drawing. Adapted with permission from [142], W. Blanc and B. Dussardier “Formation and applications of nanoparticles in silica optical fibers”, J. Opt. 2016, 45, 247–254. Copyright 2015 The Optical Society of India.
Figure 3. Principle of the preparation of the rare-earth-doped fiber by MCVD and solution doping method: (a) deposition, (b) solution doping, (c) collapsing, and (d) fiber drawing. Adapted with permission from [142], W. Blanc and B. Dussardier “Formation and applications of nanoparticles in silica optical fibers”, J. Opt. 2016, 45, 247–254. Copyright 2015 The Optical Society of India.
Fibers 07 00105 g003
Figure 4. Principle (a) double-crucible techniques and (b) melt in tube techniques. Adapted with permission from [142], W. Blanc and B. Dussardier “Formation and applications of nanoparticles in silica optical fibers”, J. Opt. 2016, 45, 247–254. Copyright 2015 The Optical Society of India.
Figure 4. Principle (a) double-crucible techniques and (b) melt in tube techniques. Adapted with permission from [142], W. Blanc and B. Dussardier “Formation and applications of nanoparticles in silica optical fibers”, J. Opt. 2016, 45, 247–254. Copyright 2015 The Optical Society of India.
Fibers 07 00105 g004
Figure 5. Left panel: Images of the 45SiO2-5Al2O3-35BaO-15TiO2 glass preform (a) before and (b) after the drawing process using the rod-in-tube technique. Right panel: micro-Raman spectra of the precursor and GC fibers at different regions; the inset is the mapping pattern at the cross-section of GC fiber. Adapted from [154], Z. Fang, X. Xiao, X. Wang, et al. “Glass-ceramic optical fiber containing Ba2TiSi2O8 nanocrystals for frequency conversion of lasers”, Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44456. CC BY 4.0.
Figure 5. Left panel: Images of the 45SiO2-5Al2O3-35BaO-15TiO2 glass preform (a) before and (b) after the drawing process using the rod-in-tube technique. Right panel: micro-Raman spectra of the precursor and GC fibers at different regions; the inset is the mapping pattern at the cross-section of GC fiber. Adapted from [154], Z. Fang, X. Xiao, X. Wang, et al. “Glass-ceramic optical fiber containing Ba2TiSi2O8 nanocrystals for frequency conversion of lasers”, Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44456. CC BY 4.0.
Fibers 07 00105 g005
Figure 6. (a) Normalized Er3+ emission spectra of magnesium-doped phase-separated optical fibers. Different lines correspond to samples with various Mg-content ranging from 0.23 to 2.7 atom %; the violet line (the narrowest spectrum) corresponds to the reference fiber without Mg. (b) SEM images of the core of the La-doped sample containing 1 atom % of La. The core section corresponds to the longitudinal view (along the drawing axis). Reproduce from [189], M. Vermillac, J.-F. Lupi, S. Trzesien, et al. “On the Enlargement of the Emission Spectra from the 4I13/2 Level of Er3+ in Silica-Based Optical Fibers through Lanthanum or Magnesium Co-Doping”, Ceramics 2018, 1, 364–374. CC BY 4.0
Figure 6. (a) Normalized Er3+ emission spectra of magnesium-doped phase-separated optical fibers. Different lines correspond to samples with various Mg-content ranging from 0.23 to 2.7 atom %; the violet line (the narrowest spectrum) corresponds to the reference fiber without Mg. (b) SEM images of the core of the La-doped sample containing 1 atom % of La. The core section corresponds to the longitudinal view (along the drawing axis). Reproduce from [189], M. Vermillac, J.-F. Lupi, S. Trzesien, et al. “On the Enlargement of the Emission Spectra from the 4I13/2 Level of Er3+ in Silica-Based Optical Fibers through Lanthanum or Magnesium Co-Doping”, Ceramics 2018, 1, 364–374. CC BY 4.0
Fibers 07 00105 g006
Figure 7. (a) Preform absorption spectrum after annealing and nanoparticle growth and (inset) side view of the preform with a red-coloured core. (b) Normalized plasmon resonance absorption spectra for fibers with nanoparticles nucleated via different processes. Fiber 1: nanoparticles nucleated in the preform stage (peak at 536 nm). Fiber 2: nanoparticles nucleated in the fiber. Fiber 3: one-step nucleation with a CO2 laser (peak at 526 nm). Fiber 4: two-step nucleation with a CO2 laser (peak at 514 nm). Adapted with permission from [201], Rafael E. P. de Oliveira, Niclas Sjödin, Michael Fokine, et al. “Fabrication and Optical Characterization of Silica Optical Fibers Containing Gold Nanoparticles”, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 370–375. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
Figure 7. (a) Preform absorption spectrum after annealing and nanoparticle growth and (inset) side view of the preform with a red-coloured core. (b) Normalized plasmon resonance absorption spectra for fibers with nanoparticles nucleated via different processes. Fiber 1: nanoparticles nucleated in the preform stage (peak at 536 nm). Fiber 2: nanoparticles nucleated in the fiber. Fiber 3: one-step nucleation with a CO2 laser (peak at 526 nm). Fiber 4: two-step nucleation with a CO2 laser (peak at 514 nm). Adapted with permission from [201], Rafael E. P. de Oliveira, Niclas Sjödin, Michael Fokine, et al. “Fabrication and Optical Characterization of Silica Optical Fibers Containing Gold Nanoparticles”, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 370–375. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
Fibers 07 00105 g007
Figure 8. SEM images of the inner walls of the MOFs coated with gold particles (30-nm-diameter spheres): (a) An overview and (b) zoomed in. (c) Tilted front view of one hole’s cross-section at the starting point. (d) A view of the fiber end. (A homogeneous particle density-independent of curvature is apparent.). Reprinted with permission from [146], Andrea Csaki, Franka Jahn, Ines Latka, et al. “Nanoparticle Layer Deposition for Plasmonic Tuning of Microstructured Optical Fibers”, Small 2010, 6, 2584–2589. Copyright 2010 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Figure 8. SEM images of the inner walls of the MOFs coated with gold particles (30-nm-diameter spheres): (a) An overview and (b) zoomed in. (c) Tilted front view of one hole’s cross-section at the starting point. (d) A view of the fiber end. (A homogeneous particle density-independent of curvature is apparent.). Reprinted with permission from [146], Andrea Csaki, Franka Jahn, Ines Latka, et al. “Nanoparticle Layer Deposition for Plasmonic Tuning of Microstructured Optical Fibers”, Small 2010, 6, 2584–2589. Copyright 2010 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Fibers 07 00105 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Veber, A.; Lu, Z.; Vermillac, M.; Pigeonneau, F.; Blanc, W.; Petit, L. Nano-Structured Optical Fibers Made of Glass-Ceramics, and Phase Separated and Metallic Particle-Containing Glasses. Fibers 2019, 7, 105.

AMA Style

Veber A, Lu Z, Vermillac M, Pigeonneau F, Blanc W, Petit L. Nano-Structured Optical Fibers Made of Glass-Ceramics, and Phase Separated and Metallic Particle-Containing Glasses. Fibers. 2019; 7(12):105.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Veber, Alexander, Zhuorui Lu, Manuel Vermillac, Franck Pigeonneau, Wilfried Blanc, and Laeticia Petit. 2019. "Nano-Structured Optical Fibers Made of Glass-Ceramics, and Phase Separated and Metallic Particle-Containing Glasses" Fibers 7, no. 12: 105.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop