Next Article in Journal
Surface Property Differences of European Larch Sapwood and Heartwood After Sanding
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Gear Set Loading on Surface Damage Forms for Gear Teeth with DLC Coating
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simple Spin-Coating Preparation of Hydrogel and Nanoparticle-Loaded Hydrogel Thin Films

1
Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, BO, Italy
2
ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, C.R. Bologna, Via dei Mille 21, 40121 Bologna, BO, Italy
3
ENEA, Italian Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, C.R. Brasimone, Località Brasimone, 40032 Camugnano, BO, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2025, 15(7), 859; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15070859
Submission received: 20 May 2025 / Revised: 3 July 2025 / Accepted: 15 July 2025 / Published: 21 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Thin Films)

Abstract

Hydrogel films receive significant attention among researchers because they combine increased stimuli responsiveness and faster responses to the already excellent properties of their component materials. However, their preparation is complex and requires that many difficulties are overcome. The present work presents a new study regarding the preparation of pure and nanoparticle-loaded alginate-based films by spin-coating. Two-microliter solutions of sodium alginate and calcium chloride with different concentrations were deposited on a glass substrate and subjected to rapid rotations of between 100 and 1000 RPM. Film formation can be achieved by optimizing the ratio between the viscosity of the solutions, depending on their concentrations and the rotation speed. When these conditions are in the right range, a homogeneous film is obtained, showing good adherence to the substrate and uniform thickness. Films containing silver nanoparticles were prepared, exploiting the reaction between sodium borohydride and silver nitrate. The two reagents were added to the sodium alginate and calcium nitrate solution, respectively. Their concentration is the driving force for the formation of a uniform film: particles of about 50 nm that are well-dispersed throughout the film are obtained using AgNO3 at 4 mM and NaBH4 at 2 or 0.2 mM; meanwhile, at higher concentrations, one can also obtain the precipitation of inorganic crystals.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Gels consist of a three-dimensional, physically or chemically cross-linked polymeric network and a liquid phase (water in the case of hydrogel), dispersed among the meshes and pores of the network [1,2]. The liquid content can even exceed 95% by weight [3].
The interplay between the chemical and physical characteristics of the liquid phase and of the polymeric component determines the properties of the gels and offers the possibility for their fine control. This is achieved by regulating the nature of the chains, their average molecular weight, the degree of cross-linking, and the presence of possible additives such as nanoparticles or drugs, and this makes gels very attractive and interesting for various applications [4].
Hydrogels, due to their softness, elasticity, and outstanding mechanical properties, have long attracted interest across multiple disciplines—including chemistry, physics, and engineering. Today, they find applications in a wide variety of fields, ranging from sensors [5] to actuators [6], with particular relevance in the biomedical sector [7]. This is especially true for hydrogels derived from biocompatible polymers such as alginate and chitosan.
Hydrogels are often referred to as “smart” materials because they are able to dynamically respond to environmental stimuli [8]. Their unique characteristics make them suitable for innovations in drug delivery, tissue engineering, wound healing, and more [9].
Surprisingly, both fundamental and applied research has focused mainly on bulk hydrogels and much less on these materials in the form of films, although the films retain the material’s properties, including high swelling ability, but also display increased stimuli responsiveness and faster responses [10]. Thin films of hydrogels often exhibit higher stiffness, strength, and stretchability than bulk samples [11].
There are numerous techniques for the fabrication of hydrogel films [12]. Generally, as a first step, the preparation requires the formation of a film from precursors, which can be either monomers or non-cross-linked polymers. A solution of these precursors is deposited, and then it undergoes a transition to form the network structure. Among the possible methods for inducing the formation of the film, it is worth mentioning photopolymerization, photolithographic polymerization in single or multiple steps, dip-coating with UV-induced polymerization, and solvent-casting combined with complexation with (poly)electrolytes [11,13].
Unfortunately, despite these advantages, the preparation of good-quality hydrogel films is complex, and numerous challenges must be addressed to obtain samples with excellent, uniform, and stable properties. Challenges include the control of swelling and degradation, achieving high mechanical strength, ensuring proper cross-linking, and addressing issues such as phase separation and brittleness [14]. Furthermore, the selection and preparation of the substrate pose significant challenges and are often time-consuming. Most preparation techniques are not only labor-intensive but also costly and difficult to industrialize or scale up. Therefore, any approach that helps overcome these limitations represents a valuable step forward toward the broader adoption of hydrogel films and their future applications.
In this work, the preparation and characterization of alginate-based hydrogel thin films using a spin-coating technique are presented. This preparation route is simple, economical, and enables us to obtain excellent-quality samples very quickly. In particular, this approach has been employed for the fabrication of alginate-based hydrogels, a material that combines excellent properties with biocompatibility and biodegradability, and is widely used in the biomedical field. Alginate hydrogels are in fact used for wound healing and tissue engineering for the controlled release of drugs and active molecules, since the degree of the cross-linking of the matrix can be precisely controlled [15,16,17].
Spin-coating is a process that is used to apply a uniform film to a flat substrate. Its principle is to deposit a small amount of a solution of the species of interest, in this case alginate, on the substrate, which is then rapidly rotated to distribute the fluid over the substrate by centrifugal force [18]. The rotation is stopped as soon as the desired thickness is reached. When spin-coating is used for semiconductor, ceramic, or similar materials, the solvent is evaporated, thus enabling the formation of the desired film with a very thin thicknesses, even a few nanometers [19]. In the case of polymeric materials, factors such as the viscosity of the system must also be taken into consideration; the viscosity of the system increases significantly during the gelation phase.
Sodium alginate is soluble in water and therefore it can be used for the initial solution and gelation can be induced by the substitution of sodium ions by different divalent cations (Ca2+, Sr2+, Zn2+, and others). A physical cross-linking occurs due to ionic bonds between divalent cations and carboxyl groups on alginate [20,21]. This route is, in principle, one of the most common and simplest for preparing alginate-based hydrogels. The gelation rate in this case is very high, directly depending on the diffusion rate of the cations in the medium. However, it decreases when the degree of cross-linking and therefore the viscosity increases. For this reason, the samples obtained are often highly inhomogeneous with areas that present different reticulation degree, density, and, consequently, diverse properties.
In the case of thin films, this difficulty can be overcome thanks to the small volume of material involved. On the contrary, the increasing viscosity contributes to the greater adhesion of the film to the substrate and to keeping the thickness under control. Furthermore, it is also possible to use substrates of different nature, such as simple glass slides, and not necessarily specific ones, carefully prepared.
The idea of this work is therefore to obtain an alginate film by spin-coating, depositing a small volume of sodium alginate solution on a substrate and inducing gelation by adding a second solution of calcium salt, while the substrate is rotating. It is also possible to obtain gels loaded with nanoparticles using this route.
Hydrogel–nanoparticle composites are very interesting and promising systems because they can effectively integrate the beneficial properties of both original systems, while minimizing potential adverse effects, especially cytotoxicity. However, the integration of nanoparticles into hydrogels is not a trivial task and it requires the development of methods specifically for this purpose. Nanoparticles can be prepared separately and subsequently dispersed in the gel, or in situ, when possible. In the first case, it can be difficult to avoid distribution gradients within the matrix; meanwhile, in the second case, it is necessary to design appropriate synthesis methods and, often, traces of compounds used as catalysts or byproducts can remain in the system. The method described here has proven to be efficient and very simple also for the preparation of gels loaded with nanoparticles.
In this case, gels loaded with silver nanoparticles were prepared by adding sodium borohydride and silver nitrate to the two solutions, respectively, to exploit the oxidation–reduction reaction in situ. This approach might also be generalizable to other nanoparticles, if it is possible to determine and control their growth conditions or if it is possible to somehow disperse separately prepared particles in the medium.
Several factors can play a role in the formation of films, such as temperature, concentration of the main and additive solutions, and rotation speed of the substrate. For these reasons, the process was conducted using a rotation equal to 100, 500, and 1000 RPM (rotations per minute) to investigate their effect on the film formation, the morphological characteristics, and the particle distribution.
Selected specimens, prepared with this technique, were characterized by optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) by UV–Vis and FTIR spectroscopies and X-ray diffraction (XRD) to study the appearance and the general features of these films.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials and Methods

The films were prepared by depositing a volume of 2 μL of sodium alginate (SA, purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), with average molecular weight in the range 20,000–60,000 Da, according to the manufacturer’s specifications) solution onto a 2 × 2 cm2 glass slide. A second drop of the same volume of three different calcium nitrate solutions was added, and the substrate was quickly put in rotation at the desired value.
Two SA solutions have been prepared dissolving 0.05 and 0.1 g, respectively, of sodium alginate in 5 mL of water at 60 °C, under continuous magnetic stirring until it completely dissolved, for no less than 6 h. In parallel, the Ca2+ solutions were prepared to concentrations of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 M, dissolving Ca(NO3)2 (purchased from Sigma Aldrich, (St. Louis, MO, USA)) in water. The rotation speeds of the substrate were adjusted to 100, 500, 750, and 1000 RPM, respectively. A second series of experiments was carried out to obtain films loaded with silver nanoparticles. In this case, the starting solutions also contain AgNO3 as a source of silver and sodium borohydride as a reducing agent. Silver nitrate was added to the calcium nitrate solution, to avoid any possible incipient oxidation–reduction reaction in the SA solution, while the reducing agent was added to the sodium alginate solution. Then, the two solutions were put in contact, in a similar manner as in the previous preparation. The amount of silver nitrate was set to have a concentration equal to 4 mM, while the amounts of NaBH4 was set to have a concentration equal to 2 mM and 0.2 mM. The loaded films were prepared with rotations equal to 500 and 750 RPM.
Table 1 summarizes the experimental conditions used for the preparation of the films.
After their preparation, the films were completely dehydrated to accommodate analyses for determining their chemical–physical characterizations; this was achieved by keeping them at 40 °C for a few days. This induced significant reductions in the thicknesses of the films.

2.2. Characterization Methods

After being dehydrated, the films were characterized using different techniques. The characterization of the samples, in terms of their morphologies, were performed by scanning electron microscopy using an FEI QUANTA INSPECT S Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) operating under low-vacuum mode (FEI Company, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). Observations were carried out at different magnifications using both secondary electrons and backscattered electron detectors at a 10 mm working distance, with energy ranging from 10 to 20 KV.
The morphology was also investigated by optical microscopy using a HIROX HRX-01 microscope (HIROX, Tokyo, Japan), equipped with a telecentric ultra-high resolution zoom lens and a microscope lens revolver. For the image acquisition and elaboration, proprietary software was utilized.
The samples were analyzed by IR spectroscopy to investigate the chemical properties of the gel, using ThermoFisher ScientificNicolet 6700 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled to a versatile Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) sampling accessory module smart itx high-performance diamond; a best resolution of 0.25 cm−1 between 450 cm−1 and 4000 cm−1 was used, and the transmittance of the samples averaging over 36 scans was measured after the background in the air was identified. For this analysis, a sample was carefully detached from the substrate with a scalpel to avoid any interference due to glass absorption from occurring.
UV–Vis absorbance spectra were acquired using a high-resolution, double-beam, double-monochromator JASCO V-760 UV–Visible Spectrophotometer (JASCO Corporation Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan), working with a deuterium lamp in the range between 187 and 350 nm, a halogen lamp in the range of 300–900 nm, and a photomultiplier tube as a detector. The spectra were collected with an average of 8 acquisitions in the range 300–800 nm, with a spectral bandwidth as narrow as 2 nm and a scanning speed equal to 400 nm/min, after baseline correction was performed.
X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) investigations were performed to determine the crystalline phases using a Philips X’Pert PRO 3040/60 diffractometer (Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) operating at 40 kV, 40 mA, with Bragg–Brentano geometry, equipped with a Cu Kα source (1.54178 Å), which was Ni-filtered, with a curved graphite monochromator. PANalytical High Score software (version 4.1) was used for data elaboration. XRD acquisitions were performed using the following parameters: a start position of 10° [2θ]; an end position of 100° [2θ]; a step size of 0.0250°; a scan step time of 6.0000 s; continuous scan type.

3. Results and Discussion

Sodium alginate is a salt of alginic acid, which in turn is a naturally occurring, edible polysaccharide found in brown algae [20]. This acid is a linear and non-branched copolymer made by randomly distributed blocks of (1→4)-linked β-D-mannuronate (M) and α-L-guluronate (G) residues; these are linked together by strong covalent bonds [22]. Hydrogels based on alginates are widely studied as a common biomaterial for the bio-fabrication of scaffolds and tissue regeneration and for their favorable properties, which encourage regeneration, cell proliferation, and mechanical strength [23]. As described above, it is possible to induce the gelation of the chains by replacing sodium ions with ions of higher valence; this is because physical cross-linking occurs due to new ionic bonds that are created. The underlying physicochemical process of gelation is complex. However, a widely accepted model suggests that two opposing G-block sequences interact to form distorted structures and cavities, which can accommodate divalent cations—particularly Ca²⁺—through ionic coordination [24]. This induces the cross-linking of the alginate chains and creates a junction structure that geometrically resembles an egg box [25]. Low contents of calcium lead to chain dimerization of alginate chains and, as the concentration increases, the junction zones of different chains associate to form three-dimensional networks.
The G-blocks adopt a “zig-zag”-like helical structure whose cavities represent highly selective sites for the formation of bonds with Ca2+ ions. The binding of Ca2+ ions involves four-oxygen coordination [26,27]. The gelation process proceeds through several distinct stages, including mono-complexation, dimerization, and lateral aggregation into multimers [28]. Each of these occurs for the specific concentrations of calcium. It is also well known that too-low concentrations of calcium do not induce gelation at all and that factors such as the molecular weight play an important role; this is because a higher concentration or a molecular weight can lead to a faster gelation process [25,27]. Gelation is often very rapid, and this can cause strong calcium concentration gradients, resulting in an inhomogeneous gel; moreover, if the thickness is too high, then the center of the sample may not even gel at all.
Figure 1 shows the chemical structure of the sodium alginate molecule and a schematic representation of the interactions that occur between alginate chains and divalent cations, leading to the formation of physical cross-linking inside the gel.
The small volume of the films represents an advantage, as it reduces the concentration gradients and promotes sample homogeneity. For film deposition, gel formation is achieved by dropping sodium alginate and calcium nitrate solutions onto a substrate positioned in a spin-coater, which is operated at a constant speed for two minutes.
While the solutions spread over the supporting substrate, a gelation reaction takes place, forming a compact and well-adherent film on the substrate. Once dehydrated, the film becomes thinner, reaching a thickness measuring less than one micrometer.
Figure 2 shows a schematic representation of the formation of a hydrated alginate film. Interestingly, when the starting solutions contain silver nitrate and sodium borohydride too, silver nanoparticles are simultaneously formed.
In this case, calcium nitrate was used as a source of calcium ions. In principle, calcium chloride—being equally soluble—could have been used for the preparation of pure hydrogels. However, in the presence of silver ions, it leads to the formation of silver chloride (AgCl), a highly insoluble compound. Since the goal was to obtain metallic silver particles, the use of chloride was avoided.
If the two drops of sodium alginate and calcium nitrate solution are brought into contact with the rotation off, a hydrogel bead is quickly formed due to the small volume involved. The wettability of water on glass is high, with a contact angle measuring about 45–47° [29]. This prevents the liquid from flowing freely on the substrate, together with the surface tension, which increases during gelation. On the contrary, the two isolated solutions are rapidly thrown away by centrifugal force, even at low rotation speeds.
Therefore, the formation of the gel film requires a balance between the viscosity of the liquid medium (which tends to act as an elastic-restoring force, keeping the liquid bubble compact and thick) and the centrifugal force, due to the rotation which instead tends to the sideward spread of the liquid mass.
In general, when the rotation speed is low, the tension force prevails and the droplet does not spread much, contrariwise when the rotation value is set to the upper limit (1000 RPM), the liquid is sprayed away before the gelation is completed. For this reason, the ideal rotation speed is around 500–750 RMP, although this range depends mainly on the concentration of sodium alginate solution. It is worth noting that even the lowest concentration of calcium nitrate used in this study is likely above the minimum required to induce alginate gelation. As a result, the resulting films appear very similar to one another, regardless of the initial calcium nitrate concentration.
The chemical nature of the film thus obtained was analyzed by FTIR spectroscopy. Vibrational spectroscopic techniques are powerful tools for the non-destructive chemical characterization of materials.
A typical spectrum of these films is shown in Figure 3 and it is very consistent with what has been reported in the literature [30], even if the sample has been mechanically detached from the support; this may induce some strain, which can be reflected in the FTIR spectrum, highlighting that the method is effective for the preparation of calcium alginate hydrogels.
The spectrum shows several important features: The first is a very broad band between about 3650 and 3000 cm−1 and centered around 3250 cm−1, which is in the region corresponding to the stretching of the OH groups. At about 2935 cm−1, a band is present due to the antisymmetric stretching of CH; meanwhile, the symmetric mode is weaker at about 2875 cm−1. Other prominent peaks are found around the following areas: 1600 cm⁻¹, corresponding to the antisymmetric stretching vibration of the carboxylate (COO-) groups; 1420 cm⁻¹, corresponding to the symmetric COO- stretching, even if this band appears as a shoulder; 1060 cm⁻¹ C-O stretching. It is worth noting the bands around 1100 and around 1030 cm−1, which are associated with the presence of guluronic and mannuronic acid residues, respectively. In this case, however, these are not clearly visible and appear rather as a shoulder of the adjacent, more intense peaks. From their relative ratios, it is possible to roughly estimate the ratios of these units in the polymer chains [31]; in this case, their relative abundances appear rather similar. This ratio is an important parameter because it influences the gelling properties of alginate. When the mannuronic residues prevail, more flexible gels are formed; meanwhile, when the guluronic residues groups are more abundant, they are also more resistant, and rigid gels are formed. Spectroscopic analyses therefore demonstrate that the preparation method is effective. This means that the gelation kinetics are comparable with the parameters imposed by the experimental conditions of the method. The gelation rate depends on factors such as the average molecular weight and the calcium concentration and increases as they increase. This means that careful optimization and regulation of the rotation speed of the substrate in relation to these parameters are necessary.
In this rotational speed range, the films that form have a surface of a few square millimeters, a diameter measuring between approximately 3 and 6 mm, and they are very compact and well-adhered to the substrate. As for the thickness, it is relatively uniform, although it must be noted that the thickness depends on the degree of hydration of the gel. The volume of the films in their fully hydrated state can be more than 40 times the volume of the films in their fully dehydrated state.
However, by elementary geometric considerations, it can be estimated that the newly formed films have a thickness that is slightly over a hundred micrometers, since the additive volume of the two drops of parent solutions is 4 mm3, spreading over a surface of approximately 20 mm2.
Once in a completely dry state, the thickness can decrease in the range 10–50 microns.
Calcium alginates are well known for their excellent water absorption and swelling capabilities. In fact, their swelling ratio can be as high as 30–50. In this case, due to the constraint of the presence of the substrate that prevents lateral swelling, it is lower, as shown in Figure 4, reaching only about 12.
The samples were immersed in 40 mL of distilled water to allow absorption. The samples were weighed after fixed intervals.
Swelling, Sm, can be defined as shown in Equation:
S m = m f m 0 m 0
where mf and m0 are the final and initial masses, respectively.
A small decrease in weight can also be observed after about 24 h; this may be due to a possible partial degradation of the sample and the fact that, gradually, some substances such as sodium nitrate that were initially present can be washed away. Furthermore, the swelling properties of alginate gels are highly dependent on factors such as pH, ionic strength, and the degree of cross-linking; therefore, even similar samples can behave quite differently. Thus, this curve should be seen as qualitative and only indicative of the behavior of these materials. In fact, to reduce experimental error—arising from the difficulty of handling these samples and from procedural issues (for example, mass loss during excess water removal or, conversely, residual water remaining on the surface)—the weight variation should be averaged over multiple samples.
Nevertheless, the swelling ability, together with the IR spectroscopy observations, provides evidence that the preparation method was effective and led to the formation of hydrogels.
The morphological features of the films have been investigated by electronic and optical microscopies.
In Figure 5, an SEM image obtained using backscattered electrons (BSE) is presented. It shows the appearance of an AlgHy3 sample film obtained with a rotation speed of 750, with a focus on the region near its edge.
The images obtained by the BSE detector show differences in atomic number: the higher the atomic number is, the brighter the material appears in the image. Since silicon has more than double the atomic mass of carbon, in Figure 4, the bright region is the glass substrate, while the dark one is the hydrogel film.
The film appears to be very uniform, except for a few areas (not shown here) where there are some rips, likely due to the handling of the sample. Furthermore, the film does not appear to be disconnected or in any way raised from the substrate even at its edges, highlighting its good adhesion at the interface with the substrate. The dehydration process certainly induces mechanical stresses in the gel film. Therefore, we cannot completely exclude the possibility that such damages are related these mechanical stresses; however, the polymer matrix is normally very elastic and able to withstand such deformations.
The edge itself also appears very sharp and defined and forms a continuous, clean line, without defective features.
Similar observations can be made by digital optical microscopy. Figure 6 shows the appearance and profile of a film prepared at 750 RPM and a sodium alginate concentration of 10 g/L and 0.2 M for Ca(NO3)2, after three months of aging at room temperature. This film is less than 100 μm thick, and its profile is very uniform in the central part, with height fluctuations of a few micrometers or smaller (Figure 6a). At the edges, the thickness gradually and uniformly along the entire front decreases to 0, with an angle of about 25° (Figure 6b).
The smooth slope with which the film degrades is interesting. In fact, it can be reasonably assumed that the film edge profile results from processes that occur during gelation and, once the process is completed, does not change further. The moderate slope of the edge would therefore be a consequence of the interactions between the parent liquid solution and the glass substrate. Since the solution is, in any case, relatively dilute, the interactions are not very different from those between water and glass. In this case, the contact angle, a thermodynamic quantity that describes the angle at the liquid–solid interface, is very modest. A low contact angle indicates a good compatibility between a liquid and the substrate. The solution from which the gel originates spreads well on the glass thanks to favorable interactions, and this could justify the high adhesion of these films to glass, observable both in SEM and in optical tests. However, this should be confirmed through dedicated studies, such as scratch testing. More generally, it would be of great interest to investigate the mechanical properties of these films—such as their hardness and creep—using microindentation experiments. It is conceivable that these properties could be finely tuned by controlling the degree of cross-linking and the chemical nature of the polymer chains, thereby broadening the range of potential applications. Further investigations are needed to study these aspects.
In any case, this observation indicates that gelation occurs throughout the region where the two parent liquids come into contact, uniformly and without gradients from the center to the edges, and that when gelation is complete, the film spreading stops. Therefore, this also means that the preparation route that passes through simultaneous gelation and rotation is effective for obtaining films of hydrogels.
Similar considerations can be made in the case of Ag-loaded gel films, although there are some important differences. They were prepared using optimal conditions for the preparation of unloaded films; only the concentrations of secondary reagents changed. In fact, Figure 7 shows the typical appearance of the loaded films can be prepared, demonstrating that the method can be effective in this case too.
Ag nanoparticles stem from the redox reaction between silver nitrates and sodium borohydride [32,33]. The former compound is commonly used as a starting reagent for this synthesis, while the latter is a well-known reducing agent [34,35].
In aqueous solution, it is possible to write the following redox Reaction (1) [36]:
AgNO3 + NaBH4 + 3 H2O → Ag + 7/2 H2+ H3BO3 + NaNO3
The presence of boric acid, H3BO3, as a product of this reaction should be viewed formally since the solution chemistry of boron-containing ions and molecular species is complex; numerous equilibria between them can be easily established, without changes to the general stoichiometry of the reaction.
The redox process occurs very quickly once the reagents come into contact. In this case, the reagents are solubilized in the two solutions used to prepare the films.
Since Ag+ ions can be reduced, albeit slowly and inefficiently, also by the free hydroxyl groups of polysaccharides, it is preferable to solubilize them as silver nitrates together with calcium nitrate and sodium borohydride in the alginate solution, so that the reaction begins only when the two liquids come into contact and the rotation starts.
The release of numerous bubbles, due to the formation of hydrogen, occurred for the samples prepared using the solution with the highest borohydride concentration. This has been seen to damage the film during its formation. The SEM analyses detected holes and other defects in the polymer matrices. However, such bubble formation was not observed, or it was at least greatly reduced, in the case of the solution with the lowest concentration.
In this case, numerous crystalline particles of average size below 1 micrometer are formed, and they are well-dispersed in the film, as shown in Figure 8a–d.
The SEM images provide evidence that the most typical morphology of these particles is octahedral; however, there are less abundant morphologies, comprising other shapes—here, rod-like morphologies are the most common.
From the image analysis, in fact, it is possible to establish the dispersion curves of the particle size and evaluate their widths and other characteristics. Figure 9 shows the histogram of the particle size distribution curve, obtained by measuring the sizes of 300 particles.
This distribution should be seen as indicative because the method has the limitation of underestimating the number of small particles. Despite this, it turns out that the particles are very uniform in size and that the curve is quite narrow—though it is slightly asymmetric—with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of around 10–15 nm. Very large particles are rare and most of them are likely aggregates of smaller particles. The peak of the curve is centered around 95 nm.
Most of these particles are isolated inside the gel matrix (as can be seen in Figure 8b) and the average distance between them is a few microns, but some aggregates or clusters of particles exist where the particle density is much higher. However, in some parts of the film, especially at the edges, the particles tend to align along the lines that are parallel to each other, as can be observed in Figure 8d (the dotted green lines in the insert of this figure are a guide for the eyes). The distance between these lines, which are not perfectly straight over a distance of a few tens of microns, is quite constant. This suggests that, in these partially ordered regions, the particles form before the local gelation is complete; for this reason, they are dragged by the rotating fluid.
This observation, together with the fact that these particles are very similar in size, can provide some useful clues about the mechanism of their formation. If they appeared at different times during the gelation process or even after it had finished—for example, by the slow diffusion of the reagents through the matrix—a much wider distribution could be expected. The particles nucleated in the early moments of the process would have more time to grow and would become very large, while the later ones would remain small. Conversely, the constancy of their size indicates that they form at the same time in a uniform manner throughout the gel matrix. They form very quickly, as soon as the parent liquids come into contact, when the gelation process is still in its embryonic stage. For this reason, when the gel begins to cross-link at the periphery of the sample, the liquid, the viscosity of which gradually increases, drags them along with it.
To obtain relevant insights into the pure and loaded films produced by this method, the films were characterized using UV–Vis spectroscopy. This is a powerful tool for analyzing metal nanoparticles [37] and provides information on factors such as their size, morphology, and aggregation. Indeed, due to the localized surface plasmonic resonance, the UV–Vis spectra of silver-based nanosystems are characterized by the high absorption of photons in the range between about 200 and 900 nm. Figure 10a–c show the spectra of the substrate, parent, and loaded films. The spectra were obtained by directly measuring the absorption of the samples placed along the optical path of the beam.
As can be seen in Figure 10a, the substrate has almost-negligible absorption for wavelengths above about 350 nm, but the absorption is very strong below 300 nm. Although the absolute value depends on the thickness of the substrate, this wavelength dependence of UV absorbance is characteristic of borosilicate glasses [38]. This strong absorption is the dominant feature in this part of the spectrum. However, the processed samples show significantly higher absorption than the substrate alone in the range between 400 and 800 nm. This behavior can only be attributed to the presence of a compact film. No significant differences are evident between the spectra of the samples prepared with varying experimental conditions in the range in which the films form; this observation suggests that they do not particularly influence the final thickness, but the silver-loaded samples are less transparent. It is interesting to note that the sample containing silver particles has a weak and not very well defined hump between about 500 and 600 nm, as can be seen in Figure 10c. The aqueous dispersions of silver nanoparticles have an absorption maximum between 300 and 700 nm, depending on several factors, such as the size of the particles, their morphologies, their formations, and their concentrations. These measurements should be considered qualitative; however, due to the nature of the samples, in particular due to their very small mass, it should be taken into account that particles with sizes of around 100 nm [39,40] have a maximum mass that is in approximately the same range as that observed for the films. This is not in disagreement with the observations made with the electron microscope.
Similar observations can be made by changing most of the experimental parameters, i.e., the rotation speed or the ratio between the concentration of sodium alginate and calcium nitrate. The formation of the films, in both cases of pure and of loaded films, is controlled by the gelation process; once cross-linking is completed, the matrix is no longer able to spread on the substrate. Therefore, there are a few differences between the gels that can be obtained by changing the experimental parameters.
However, when the concentration of the reducing agent is high, important differences occur. The lively and intense release of hydrogen observed at the beginning of the process disturbs the film formation and damages its structure.
Numerous holes and rips in the matrix texture are observed, as can be seen in Figure 11a,b.
Molecular hydrogen is one of the co-products of reaction 1 and this is present in a ratio of 7:2 with sodium borohydride. Therefore, a non-negligible volume of molecular hydrogen is released. If the initial concentration is low, then the bubbles that form are few and small. On the contrary, when the concentration is high, these bubbles can grow quite a lot. They damage the gel matrix while it is forming, and this implies that the samples obtained in this way could not be usable and that the nanoparticles could escape from the film.
Indeed, numerous crystalline silver particles—similar to those observed in the previous case—are also present here, but at a significantly higher concentration (Figure 11c). In this case, instead of being mostly isolated—as was the case when the concentration of the reducing agent was lower—the particles are found preferentially in clumps and clusters, which is likely because of the extremely rapid and uncontrolled nucleation. Above all, numerous other crystals are present, due to various inorganic phases (Figure 11d), suggesting a different chemical path.
These crystals have a tabular hexagonal formation and are rich in boron. Among the possible phases, boric acid and metaboric acid should be mentioned; these can be formed, together with sodium nitrate, during the oxidation–reduction reaction between silver nitrate and sodium borohydride. However, since sodium is also present, the most probable compound is borax, Na2B4O7*10H2O. While silver nanoparticles are obviously insoluble, these two compounds are soluble in water. Therefore, they are initially dissolved in the water dispersed between the polymer meshes of the gel. When the synthesis is performed using a low concentration of sodium borohydride, their concentration is also negligible; moreover, any crystals that form by precipitation when the water is removed from the film are few, small, and difficult to detect. When the concentration of the reducing agent is high, the concentration of these compounds also increases; consequently, a greater number of crystals can be detected. Boric acid is also much less soluble in water at low temperatures than it is at high temperatures, thus favoring the growth of these crystals.
To gain further insight into the nature of these particles and the crystalline phases present and to gain structural information on the film, they were analyzed by XRD diffraction. Figure 12 shows the XRD patterns of the pure film and those loaded with silver particles, prepared using different concentrations of sodium borohydride, and that of the substrate as a reference. For clarity, only the theoretical pattern of silver is shown; however, the peaks, marked by symbols, are recognizable due to other inorganic crystalline phases (including, somewhat surprisingly, calcite, CaCO3). This may conceivably derive from the later alteration of calcium nitrate, whose peaks are in fact rather weak.
All the curves have a modest intensity and are very noisy, both due to the nature of the material and the fact that the analyzed mass is, in itself, very small.
The pure-alginate film is, as expected, amorphous and does not show any peculiar characteristics; on the contrary, it follows the diffractogram of the substrate quite well, which is also amorphous. Since the film is thin, their relative intensities are not very different either.
However, in the case of the pure film, a relatively intense peak associated with calcium carbonate is evident. This is—regardless of its origin—quite surprising; the calcite probably derives from the initial presence of calcium nitrate by subsequent precipitation. This means that calcium nitrate was present in a small excess in respect to the value needed to achieve complete gelation; therefore, the film formation parameters and the compositions of the starting solutions can still be optimized.
In the film prepared with the highest amount of sodium borohydride, the peaks of silver nanoparticles represent the main feature that can be noticed; they are not so evident in the other sample. This is due to a much lower concentration that leads to a lower intensity, which is barely distinguishable from the noise of the diffractogram.
In the first sample, it is also possible to recognize the presence of other phases that initially remain in the solution but crystallize when the sample loses its water. A small quantity of sodium nitrate can be present and among the boron-based phases, and borax is the one that best fits the peaks. Metaboric acid and boric acid may be also present, but in very small concentrations. Borax forms because of the relatively high concentration of Na+ ions, which arise both from the reaction of sodium borohydride and from the substitution of calcium ions between the alginate chains, according to the following Reaction (2):
4H3BO3 + 2NaNO3 + 5 H2O → Na2B4O7 * 10H2O + 2HNO3
This reaction could also explain the fact that the peaks associated with sodium nitrate are very weak. In fact, it would be consumed while borax is formed.
The oxidation–reduction reaction is exothermic, and borax is more soluble in water at high temperatures, so it can be imagined that, in the first moments, the concentration of the crystals is low. However, since the mass of the sample is small, it cools very quickly, inducing conditions of supersaturation within the matrix just as quickly. Therefore, the crystals begin to precipitate simultaneously, and their size is uniform.
In all cases, these compounds are, unlike silver, very soluble in water. Therefore, in principle, they could be removed by a series of washing and desiccation cycles; but silver nanoparticles could also escape from the matrix following this treatment. Accordingly, in this study, the authors preferred not to conduct this treatment.
The good agreement between the analyses performed with the electron microscope and those of diffraction positively show that it is possible to obtain alginate films and that it is also possible to load them with silver nanoparticles.

4. Conclusions

Calcium alginate films were prepared by spin-coating onto glass substrates. The process proved to be effective, and they formed in a non-narrow range of conditions. To achieve this result, two small volumes of sodium alginate and calcium nitrate solutions were brought into contact on the rotating substrate. Calcium ions induce physical cross-linking by replacing sodium ions between the polymer chains. This greatly increases the viscosity of the medium. A film then forms as a result of the two contrasting actions, namely the centrifugal force due to rotation, which tends to spread the fluid on the substrate, and the elastic restoring force due to surface tension, which tends to keep the mass compact.
This method could also be applicable to other hydrogels, for which the gelation rate is rapid but not instantaneous, so that an equilibrium with the centrifugal force can be established.
It was also possible to load the gels with nanoparticles—in this case, silver. They were prepared in situ by a redox reaction with sodium borohydride. For this purpose, two dilute solutions of silver nitrate and the reducing agent were prepared and added to the calcium nitrate and sodium alginate solutions, respectively. As soon as the liquids come into contact, a rapid reaction between them takes place, leading to the presence of nanoparticles. They have a size of less than 100 nm, as shown by SEM analyses and UV–Vis spectroscopy. The concentration of these reagents is the driving force for uniformly dispersed particles being obtained in the medium.
Similarly, in this case, it can be hypothesized that the method could be extended to other types of nanoparticles—either formed in situ through appropriate reactions or pre-dispersed in the gelling fluid. Silver nanoparticles may be useful for their well-known antibacterial properties and gels containing them could profitably benefit from these capabilities. Nevertheless, it could be possible to imagine loading the gel film with other particles as well, directly in situ if their synthesis reaction is easily accessible, considerably widening the range of possible applications of these materials. It is worth noting that homogenously distributing nanoparticles in gels, especially in the form of films, is not a trivial task.
The here-presented films show broad application potential, prominently within the biomedical sector, where they could be used for controlled drug release or to harness the bactericidal properties of nanoparticles. Their unique physical properties also make them suitable for applications/advancements in the sensor field. A significant advantage of this preparation method is the ability to form highly adherent films on common substrates like glass slides without requiring complex surface pretreatment (this is a factor that often complicates film production). Notably, the biomedical sector is the most promising area for these materials, given that hydrogels derived from biopolymers are already widely employed in critical applications such as wound healing, tissue engineering, and the controlled delivery of drugs and molecules.
However, such applications entail the need to satisfy very stringent requirements in terms of biocompatibility and cytotoxicity.
Obtaining this information certainly requires a dedicated and in-depth investigation and it is necessary to establish the correct design of the experiments in a very rigorous way, with a precise protocol of experiments.
The synthesis described in this work has the advantage of avoiding the use of additional reagents or stabilizers, as the films are formed directly through a reaction between the solutions, containing only the necessary precursors. The main secondary products are highly soluble salts, which can, in principle, be removed by thorough washing with water. This represents a significant benefit, making the method not only simple but also highly cost-effective. Nevertheless, further studies are required to enable the practical application of these films. The formation of easily removable byproducts further enhances the economic viability of the approach.
Further analyses will be essential to develop concrete/practical applications for these films.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.U. and C.C.; methodology, R.G., S.B. and A.U.; validation: C.C., S.C. (Sebastiano Cataldo), V.C., R.G. and S.B.; formal analysis, A.U.; investigation, A.U., C.C., R.G. and S.B.; writing—original draft, A.U. and S.C. (Sara Calistri); writing—review and editing, A.U., S.C. (Sara Calistri), C.C. and S.C. (Sebastiano Cataldo). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (Piano 494 Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza—PNRR-I.3.3, DM 117-2023) ID: 8959, as a part of the European 495; by recovery programme NextGenerationEU (NGEU) and by regional project LINC-ER, funded by “Regione Emilia-Romagna”, DGR N. 545/2019 Theranosti Centre srl.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ullah, F.; Othman, M.B.H.; Javed, F.; Ahmad, Z.; Akil, H.M. Classification, processing and application of hydrogels: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 57, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Metta, S.; Khan, M.A.; Lakshmi, M.; Poojadevi, P.; Shruthi, K. A Review: Pharmaceutical Gels and Their Types with a Prominent Role in Drug Delivery Systems. Int. J. Curr. Pharm. Res. 2023, 10, 686–701. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pinto, T.C.; Martins, A.J.; Pastrana, L.; Pereira, M.C.; Cerqueira, M.A. Oleogel-Based Systems for the Delivery of Bioactive Compounds in Foods. Gels 2021, 7, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Priya, A.S.; Premanand, R.; Ragupathi, I.; Bhaviripudi, V.R.; Aepuru, R.; Kannan, K.; Shanmugaraj, K. Comprehensive Review of Hydrogel Synthesis, Characterization, and Emerging Applications. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ma, J.; Zhong, J.; Sun, F.; Liu, B.; Peng, Z.; Lian, J.; Wu, X.; Li, L.; Hao, M.; Zhang, T. Hydrogel sensors for biomedical electronics. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 481, 148317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhen, H.; Zhang, J. Rapid-Responsive Hydrogel Actuators with Hierarchical Structures: Strategies and Applications. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2023, 5, 4605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Choi, H.; Choi, W.-S.; Jeong, J.-O. A Review of Advanced Hydrogel Applications for Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery Systems as Biomaterials. Gels 2024, 10, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cao, H.; Duan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, J.; Zhang, K. Current hydrogel advances in physicochemical and biological response-driven biomedical application diversity. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Vasile, C.; Pamfil, D.; Stoleru, E.; Baican, M. New Developments in Medical Applications of Hybrid Hydrogels Containing Natural Polymers. Molecules 2020, 25, 1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Protsak, I.S.; Morozov, Y.M. Fundamentals and Advances in Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels and Their Applications: A Review. Gels 2025, 11, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Le, H.H.; Tran, V.T.; Mredha, T.I.; Na, J.Y.; Seon, J.-K.; Jeon, I. Thin-film hydrogels with superior stiffness, strength, and stretchability. Extrem. Mech. Lett. 2020, 37, 100720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mateescu, A.; Wang, Y.; Dostale, J.; Jonas, U. Thin Hydrogel Films for Optical Biosensor Applications. Membranes 2012, 2, 40–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dong, M.; Jiao, D.; Zi, Q.Z.; Wu, Z.L. Recent progress in fabrications and applications of functional hydrogel films. J. Polym. Sci. 2023, 61, 1026–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bauer, M.; Duerkop, A.; Baeumner, A.J. Critical review of polymer and hydrogel deposition methods for optical and electrochemical bioanalytical sensors correlated to the sensor’s applicability in real samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2023, 415, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, M.; Zhao, X. Alginate hydrogel dressings for advanced wound management. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jarrah, R.M.; Potes, M.D.A.; Vitija, X.; Durrani, S.; Ghaith, A.K.; Mualem, W.; Zamanian, C.; Bhandarkar, A.R.; Bydon, M. Alginate hydrogels: A potential tissue engineering intervention for intervertebral disc degeneration. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2023, 113, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Abasalizadeh, F.; Moghaddam, S.V.; Alizadeh, E.; Elahe, A.; Kashani, E.; Fazljou, S.M.B.; Torbati, M.; Akbarzadeh, A. Alginate-based hydrogels as drug delivery vehicles in cancer treatment and their applications in wound dressing and 3D bioprinting. J. Biol. Eng. 2020, 14, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zheng, S.Y.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, X.N.; Du, M.; Song, Y.; Wu, Z.L.; Zheng, Q. Spin-coating-assisted fabrication of ultrathin physical hydrogel films with high toughness and fast response. Soft Matter 2018, 14, 5888–5897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Birnie, D.P. Spin Coating Technique. In Sol-Gel Technologies for Glass Producers and Users; Aegerter, M.A., Mennig, M., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Savić Gajić, I.M.; Savić, I.M.; Svirčev, Z. Preparation and Characterization of Alginate Hydrogels with High Water-Retaining Capacity. Polymers 2023, 15, 2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tordi, P.; Ridi, F.; Samorì, P.; Bonini, M. Cation-Alginate Complexes and Their Hydrogels: A Powerful Toolkit for the Development of Next-Generation Sustainable Functional Materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2416390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fajardo, A.; Silva, M.; Lopes, L.C.; Piai, J.; Rubira, A.; Muniz, E. Hydrogel Based on an Alginate–Ca2+/Chondroitin Sulfate Matrix as a Potential Colon-Specific Drug Delivery System. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 11095–11103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, Q.; Li, Q.; Xu, S.; Zheng, Q.; Cao, X. Preparation and Properties of 3D Printed Alginate–Chitosan Polyion Complex Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering. Polymers 2018, 10, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, H.; Yang, L.; Yang, Y. A review of sodium alginate-based hydrogels: Structure, mechanisms, applications, and perspectives. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 292, 139151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, Z.J.; Srebnik, S.; Rojas, O.J. Revisiting Cation Complexation and Hydrogen Bonding of Single-Chain Polyguluronate Alginate. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22, 4027–4036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, Y.; Shen, Z.; Wang, H.; Song, Z.; Yu, D.; Li, G.; Liu, X.; Liu, W. Progress in Research on Metal Ion Crosslinking Alginate-Based Gels. Gels 2025, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Donati, I.; Christensen, B.E. Alginate-metal cation interactions: Macromolecular approach. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 321, 121280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hu, C.; Lu, W.; Sun, C.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, Y. Gelation behavior and mechanism of alginate with calcium: Dependence on monovalent counterions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 294, 119788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Vukovic, T.; Røstad, J.; Farooq, U.; Torsæter, O.; van der Net, A. Systematic Study of Wettability Alteration of Glass Surfaces by Dichlorooctamethyltetrasiloxane Silanization─A Guide for Contact Angle Modification. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 36662–36676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Balkız, G.; Evridiki, P.; Nilay, K.; Hakan, K.; Bedia Erim, F. Graphene Oxide/Alginate Quasi-Cryogels for Removal of Methylene Blue. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2018, 229, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sakugawa, K.; Ikeda, A.; Takemura, A.; Hirokuni, O. Simplified method for estimation of composition of alginates by FTIR. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 93, 1372–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cai, M.-H.; Chen, X.-Y.; Fu, L.-Q.; Du, W.-L.; Yang, X.; Mou, X.-Z.; Hu, P.-Y. Design and Development of Hybrid Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications: Recent Trends in Anticancer Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 630943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Calistri, S.; Ciantelli, C.; Cuzzola, V.; Strafella, A.; Cellamare, C.M.; Ubaldini, A. Growth of Silver Nanoparticles Embedded in a Polyacrylamide—Alginate Hybrid Hydrogel. Crystals 2025, 15, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mosier-Boss, P.A.; Becker, C.A.; Anderson, G.W.; Wiedemeier, B.J. Feasibility Studies of the NaBH4/H2O Hydrolysis to Generate Hydrogen Gas to Inflate Lighter than Air (LTA) Vehicles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 7706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Minkina, V.G.; Shabunya, S.I.; Kalinin, V.I.; Martynenko, V.V.; Smirnova, A.L. Stability of alkaline aqueous solutions of sodium borohydride. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gontijo, L.A.P.; Raphael, E.; Ferrari, D.P.S.; Ferrari, J.L.; Lyon, J.P.; Schiavon, M.A. pH effect on the synthesis of different size silver nanoparticles evaluated by DLS and their size-dependent antimicrobial activity. Matéria 2020, 25, e-12845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oyarzún, M.P.; Tapia-Arellano, A.; Cabrera, P.; Jara-Guajardo, P.; Kogan, M.J. Plasmonic Nanoparticles as Optical Sensing Probes for the Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease. Sensors 2021, 21, 2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gautam, C.R.; Yadav, A.K. Synthesis and Optical Investigations on (Ba,Sr)TiO3 Borosilicate Glasses Doped with La2O3. Opt. Photonics J. 2013, 3, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Desai, R.; Mankad, V.; Gupta, S.K.; Jha, P.K. Size Distribution of Silver Nanoparticles: UV-Visible Spectroscopic Assessment. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2012, 4, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Singh, A.; Jha, S.; Srivastava, G.; Sarkar, P.; Gogoi, P. Silver Nanoparticles as Fluorescent Probes: New Approach for Bioimaging. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2013, 2, 153. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of an alginate hydrogel (a). It is formed following the gelation of a solution of sodium alginate, a biopolymer of natural origin, which is a linear copolymer formed by blocks of (1→4)-linked β-D-mannuronate (M) and α-L-guluronate (G) residues (b). When this solution encounters solutions of divalent cations, gelation occurs, by ion exchange between these cations and the sodium ions (c). The cross-linking is of the physical type, with divalent cations (Ca2+) forming ionic bonds with the polymer chains (d).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of an alginate hydrogel (a). It is formed following the gelation of a solution of sodium alginate, a biopolymer of natural origin, which is a linear copolymer formed by blocks of (1→4)-linked β-D-mannuronate (M) and α-L-guluronate (G) residues (b). When this solution encounters solutions of divalent cations, gelation occurs, by ion exchange between these cations and the sodium ions (c). The cross-linking is of the physical type, with divalent cations (Ca2+) forming ionic bonds with the polymer chains (d).
Coatings 15 00859 g001
Figure 2. Flowchart (a) and schematic depiction (b) of the formation of a hydrogel thin film by spin-coating method.
Figure 2. Flowchart (a) and schematic depiction (b) of the formation of a hydrogel thin film by spin-coating method.
Coatings 15 00859 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectrum of calcium alginate film prepared using a rotation speed of 500 RPM and an alginate concentration of 10g/L and 0.2 M for Ca(NO3)2.
Figure 3. FTIR spectrum of calcium alginate film prepared using a rotation speed of 500 RPM and an alginate concentration of 10g/L and 0.2 M for Ca(NO3)2.
Coatings 15 00859 g003
Figure 4. Swelling behavior as a function of time of 500 RPM and an alginate concentration of 10 g/L and 0.2 M for Ca(NO3)2.
Figure 4. Swelling behavior as a function of time of 500 RPM and an alginate concentration of 10 g/L and 0.2 M for Ca(NO3)2.
Coatings 15 00859 g004
Figure 5. SEM image of a pure, dehydrated calcium alginate film (darker grey) on glass support (light grey) prepared using a rotation speed of 750 RPM and an alginate concentration of 10 g/L and 0.2 M for Ca(NO3)2.
Figure 5. SEM image of a pure, dehydrated calcium alginate film (darker grey) on glass support (light grey) prepared using a rotation speed of 750 RPM and an alginate concentration of 10 g/L and 0.2 M for Ca(NO3)2.
Coatings 15 00859 g005
Figure 6. Optical image and profile (a) and edge decrease angle (b) for a film prepared at 750 RPM and an alginate concentration of 10 g/L and 0.2 M for Ca(NO3)2.
Figure 6. Optical image and profile (a) and edge decrease angle (b) for a film prepared at 750 RPM and an alginate concentration of 10 g/L and 0.2 M for Ca(NO3)2.
Coatings 15 00859 g006
Figure 7. SEM image of a Ag-loaded calcium alginate film prepared using a rotation speed of 500 RPM and an alginate concentration of 10 g/L and 0.2 M for Ca(NO3)2; meanwhile, the concentrations of AgNO3 and NaBH4 are 0.4 and 0.02 M, respectively.
Figure 7. SEM image of a Ag-loaded calcium alginate film prepared using a rotation speed of 500 RPM and an alginate concentration of 10 g/L and 0.2 M for Ca(NO3)2; meanwhile, the concentrations of AgNO3 and NaBH4 are 0.4 and 0.02 M, respectively.
Coatings 15 00859 g007
Figure 8. SEM image of the sample Nano_Hy5 in different positions: near the center of the film at different magnifications (ac) and in a region closer to the edge (d).
Figure 8. SEM image of the sample Nano_Hy5 in different positions: near the center of the film at different magnifications (ac) and in a region closer to the edge (d).
Coatings 15 00859 g008
Figure 9. Histogram of the particle size distribution curve.
Figure 9. Histogram of the particle size distribution curve.
Coatings 15 00859 g009
Figure 10. UV spectra of the substrate alone and of the pure-alginate film (a); UV spectra of the substrate alone, of the pure-alginate film, and of the film loaded with silver nanoparticles (b) in a narrower spectral range; magnification of the loaded film alone (c) to highlight the presence of a hump, which can be referred to in the data on the nanoparticles.
Figure 10. UV spectra of the substrate alone and of the pure-alginate film (a); UV spectra of the substrate alone, of the pure-alginate film, and of the film loaded with silver nanoparticles (b) in a narrower spectral range; magnification of the loaded film alone (c) to highlight the presence of a hump, which can be referred to in the data on the nanoparticles.
Coatings 15 00859 g010
Figure 11. SEM image of the sample Nano_Hy6 in different positions, showing the damaged gel matrix (a), the presence of inorganic phases (b), aggregates of Ag particles (c), and crystals with hexagonal formation which are rich in boron (d).
Figure 11. SEM image of the sample Nano_Hy6 in different positions, showing the damaged gel matrix (a), the presence of inorganic phases (b), aggregates of Ag particles (c), and crystals with hexagonal formation which are rich in boron (d).
Coatings 15 00859 g011
Figure 12. XRD patterns of the substrate alone, the pure sample, AlgHy3, and the samples treated with sodium borohydride and silver nitrate, Nano_Hy5 and Nano_Hy6, respectively. The curves have been shifted for clarity.
Figure 12. XRD patterns of the substrate alone, the pure sample, AlgHy3, and the samples treated with sodium borohydride and silver nitrate, Nano_Hy5 and Nano_Hy6, respectively. The curves have been shifted for clarity.
Coatings 15 00859 g012
Table 1. Experimental conditions for alginate and loaded hydrogel preparation. AlHy = pure alginate hydrogel; LHy = silver-loaded hydrogel; RA = reducing agent.
Table 1. Experimental conditions for alginate and loaded hydrogel preparation. AlHy = pure alginate hydrogel; LHy = silver-loaded hydrogel; RA = reducing agent.
SampleSA Concentration [g/L]Rotation Speed [RMP]Ca(NO3)2 Concentration [mol/L]AgNO3 Concentration [mmol/L]NaBH4 Concentration [mmol/L]
AlgHy1101000.2
AlgHy2105000.2
AlgHy3107500.2
AlgHy31010000.2
AlgHy4105000.1
AlgHy5105000.5
AlgHy6201000.2
AlgHy7205000.2
AlgHy8207500.2
AlgHy92010000.2
AlgHy10205000.1
AlgHy11205000.5
AlgHy12205000.2
Nano_Hy1105000.240.2
Nano_Hy2105000.242
Nano_Hy3107500.240.2
Nano_Hy4107500.242
Nano_Hy5205000.240.2
Nano_Hy6205000.242
Nano_Hy7207500.240.2
Nano_Hy8207500.242
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Calistri, S.; Ciantelli, C.; Cataldo, S.; Cuzzola, V.; Guzzinati, R.; Busi, S.; Ubaldini, A. Simple Spin-Coating Preparation of Hydrogel and Nanoparticle-Loaded Hydrogel Thin Films. Coatings 2025, 15, 859. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15070859

AMA Style

Calistri S, Ciantelli C, Cataldo S, Cuzzola V, Guzzinati R, Busi S, Ubaldini A. Simple Spin-Coating Preparation of Hydrogel and Nanoparticle-Loaded Hydrogel Thin Films. Coatings. 2025; 15(7):859. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15070859

Chicago/Turabian Style

Calistri, Sara, Chiara Ciantelli, Sebastiano Cataldo, Vincenzo Cuzzola, Roberta Guzzinati, Simone Busi, and Alberto Ubaldini. 2025. "Simple Spin-Coating Preparation of Hydrogel and Nanoparticle-Loaded Hydrogel Thin Films" Coatings 15, no. 7: 859. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15070859

APA Style

Calistri, S., Ciantelli, C., Cataldo, S., Cuzzola, V., Guzzinati, R., Busi, S., & Ubaldini, A. (2025). Simple Spin-Coating Preparation of Hydrogel and Nanoparticle-Loaded Hydrogel Thin Films. Coatings, 15(7), 859. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15070859

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop