Next Article in Journal
Emerging Nanocomposite and Nanoarchitectonic Coatings for Biomedical Engineering
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Study on Preparation of Dry-Mixed Mortar from Coal Gangue
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Ultrasonic Vibration Frequency on Ni-Based Alloy Cladding Layer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/coatings12091306
Review Report
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Peak Cutting Force Estimation of Improved Projection Profile Method for Rock Fracturing Capacity Prediction with High Lithological Tolerance

Coatings 2022, 12(9), 1306; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12091306
by Mingyu Duan 1,2, Lefei Shao 1,*, Qibai Huang 1, Chenlin Wang 1, Xuefeng Li 3 and Yizhe Huang 4
Reviewer 1:
Bijaya Bijeta Nayak
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Mukesh Kumar
Coatings 2022, 12(9), 1306; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12091306
Submission received: 17 August 2022 / Revised: 2 September 2022 / Accepted: 2 September 2022 / Published: 6 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Investigations and Applications in Advanced Materials Processing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The overall presentation and objective of the work is good and interesting.

However the author must clarify few points.

i) Explain fig.7 more elaborately. i.e. try to improve the co-efficient of determination (R2) value which very low for each model.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your valuable comments on the revision of this article in your busy work schedule. Based on the revisions, this article provides a more detailed description of the results in Figure 7, please correct me if there is anything wrong. The answers to your questions are recorded in the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

I am happy to recommend publication, subject to cleaning up of the English.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your valuable comments on the revision of this article in your busy work schedule. Based on the revisions, the statement problem in this article is fixed. The answers to your questions are recorded in the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

This manuscript is well write. The results  has been discussed very nicely. So, I would recommend to accept this paper for the publication.

Mechanical properties of the rock materials have been studied. Yes this study is relevent and interesting.   This topic is original and  this study will give  an idea about theoretical model for estimating the peak cutting force of conical picks based on the improved projection profile method which influence the alloy head and pick body structure  
* Is the paper well written? Is the text clear and easy to read?  Response: Yes 
Conclusions consistent with the evidence and address the main question posed.   Author agrees significantly with the current academic consensus.   In some of the figure, data fittings are not appropriate (means R2 is less than 0.9 )

Author Response

Thank you very much for your valuable comments on the revisions of this paper during your busy work schedule. Based on the revisions, a detailed explanation of the reasons leading to the low value of the coefficient of determination R2 in the third analysis is provided. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop