Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Isolation and Characterization of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. from Healthy and Diseased Turkeys
Previous Article in Journal
First Report of an Escherichia coli Strain Carrying the Colistin Resistance Determinant mcr-1 from a Dog in South Korea
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spread of Antimicrobial Resistance by Salmonella enterica Serovar Choleraesuis between Close Domestic and Wild Environments
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/antibiotics9110769
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Emergence of cfr-Mediated Linezolid Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Pig Carcasses

by
Hee Young Kang
,
Dong Chan Moon
,
Abraham Fikru Mechesso
,
Ji-Hyun Choi
,
Su-Jeong Kim
,
Hyun-Ju Song
,
Mi Hyun Kim
,
Soon-Seek Yoon
and
Suk-Kyung Lim
*
Bacterial Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, 177 Hyeksin 8-ro, Gimcheon-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do 39660, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2020, 9(11), 769; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110769
Submission received: 5 October 2020 / Revised: 28 October 2020 / Accepted: 30 October 2020 / Published: 2 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Mechanisms)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Altogether, 2547 Staphylococcus aureus isolated from cattle (n = 382), pig (n = 1077), and chicken carcasses (n = 1088) during 2010–2017 were investigated for linezolid resistance and were further characterized using molecular methods. We identified linezolid resistance in only 2.3% of pig carcass isolates. The linezolid-resistant (LR) isolates presented resistance to multiple antimicrobials, including chloramphenicol, clindamycin, and tiamulin. Molecular investigation exhibited no mutations in the 23S ribosomal RNA. Nevertheless, we found mutations in ribosomal proteins rplC (G121A) and rplD (C353T) in one and seven LR strains, respectively. All the LR isolates carried the multi-resistance gene cfr, and six of them co-carried the mecA gene. Additionally, all the LR isolates co-carried the phenicol exporter gene, fexA, and presented a high level of chloramphenicol resistance. LR S. aureus isolates represented 10 genotypes, including major genotypes ST433-t318, ST541-t034, ST5-t002, and ST9-t337. Staphylococcal enterotoxin and leukotoxin-encoding genes, alone or in combination, were detected in 68% of LR isolates. Isolates from different farms presented identical or different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns. Collectively, toxigenic and LR S. aureus strains pose a crisis for public health. This study is the first to describe the mechanism of linezolid resistance in S. aureus isolated from food animal products in Korea.

1. Introduction

Linezolid belongs to the oxazolidinone antibiotics and is approved for the treatment of severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci [1]. Linezolid interferes with the peptidyltransferase site of the bacterial ribosome. This leads to disruption of protein synthesis and inhibition of bacterial growth [2]. However, the emergence of linezolid-resistant (LR) staphylococci and enterococci poses a significant and interdisciplinary public health challenge [1].
Mutation in the central loop of domain V of 23S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) (C2161T) is the primary mechanism of linezolid resistance. However, redundancy of rRNA genes makes it difficult to reach sufficient levels of resistance by a mutation in a single allele [3]. In addition, rRNA mutations often negatively affect ribosome functions and are rapidly reversed in the absence of selection [4]. Therefore, the resistance mechanism based on chemical modification of rRNA such as the acquisition of the multi-resistance gene cfr is more common [5]. Linezolid resistance is also associated with mutations in the genes coding for ribosomal proteins (L3 and L4). Moreover, the novel optrA and poxtA genes have been implicated in transferrable linezolid resistance [1,6].
The cfr gene was initially described in a bovine Staphylococcus sciuri isolate [7]. It catalyzes the methylation of A2503 in the 23S rRNA of the large ribosomal subunit [8]. The methylation leads to cross-resistance against several antimicrobial classes of drugs (phenicols, lincosamides, pleuromutilins, macrolides, oxazolidinones, and streptogramin A), conferring multidrug resistance [9,10]. Therefore, these antimicrobials can mediate selective pressure in favor of the cfr gene. The cfr gene was mostly identified on plasmids, often in close proximity to insertion sequences, which play a vital role in the mobility of the cfr gene [11]. These mobile structures have been detected among several Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including bacteria other than staphylococci, Enterococcus faecalis, and Escherichia coli [9].
The occurrence of LR S. aureus in humans and food animals has been increasingly reported in many countries [6,12,13,14,15]. Previous studies in South Korea (Korea) demonstrated the occurrence of linezolid resistance in S. aureus strains recovered from hospital patients [16,17], pigs, and chicken carcasses [18]. Despite a single report on the occurrence of the cfr gene in MRSA recovered from pig carcasses [19], to our knowledge, no attempt has been made on the detailed mechanism of linezolid resistance among S. aureus isolates recovered from animal sources in Korea to date. Korea’s meat consumption has increased in the past few years, with pork remaining the most popular source. Thus, continuous surveillance on the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial strains in animal carcasses is essential to safeguard public health. In this study, we aimed to determine the occurrence of linezolid resistance in S. aureus isolated from major food animal carcasses from 2010 to 2017, as well as to study the underlying mechanism(s) of resistance.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of LR S. aureus

Linezolid resistance was detected in 2.3% of S. aureus isolated from pigs (Table 1). The low linezolid resistance rate among pig isolates in this study was consistent with those reported in Korea in 2011 (2.9%) [18] and 2015 (0.14%) [19], but lower than a recent report in South Africa (14%) [14]. Similarly, S. aureus isolated from medical centers in various countries presented very low linezolid resistance rates (≈1%) [13,20,21]. Agreeing with our recent report [19], resistance was not observed among cattle and chicken isolates. In contrast, previous studies in Korea [18] and South Africa [14] reported that 1.2% and 9% of chicken and cattle carcass isolates, respectively, were resistant to linezolid. Linezolid is not approved for animal use in Korea. Thus, the observed difference in resistance could be associated with the frequent use of phenicols, pleuromutilins, and lincosamides in the Korean pig industry, which might co-select resistance to linezolid [22]. The detection of LR S. aureus strains in pig carcasses is worrisome because of the potential transmission to humans through the food supply chain.

2.2. Mutations and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

Spontaneous mutation in the multiple copies of 23S rRNA alleles is the primary mechanism of linezolid resistance [23]. None of the identified LR isolates exhibited this type of mutation. Resistance mediated by mutations in the 23S rRNA appears rarely, develops slowly, and is not transferrable between bacterial species [24]. However, all of the identified LR isolates carried the cfr gene (Table 2), which is associated with low-level linezolid resistance [6]. Previous studies have also identified cfr-harboring S. aureus mainly from humans and to a lesser extent from food animals in various countries, including Korea [15,19,25,26]. Notably, all but two of the cfr-carrying isolates were from different farms. The extensive dissemination of cfr-carrying strains among pig farms could be related to the association of the cfr gene to mobile elements [9], which facilitates the mobilization and horizontal transfer [27]. Moreover, the low fitness cost could attribute to the wide dissemination of the cfr gene. Previous studies have demonstrated that genes that come at low cost can stably persist in the cells, even when pathogens were not exposed to antibiotics [27,28,29,30].
Linezolid resistance mediated by the cfr gene has also been shown to coexist with other resistance mechanisms [17]. We identified mutations in ribosomal proteins rplC (G121A) and rplD (C353T) in one and seven LR strains, respectively (Table 2). These types of mutations have been linked with resistance or decreased susceptibility to linezolid [31]. The difference in linezolid resistance mechanisms between human isolates, mutations in the 23S rRNA gene [17], and pig isolates in this study indicates the presence of unique clones in the pig industry.
All the identified cfr-carrying isolates were resistant to multiple antimicrobials including chloramphenicol, clindamycin, and tiamulin, and co-carried phenicol exporter gene fexA (Table 2). The cfr gene has been reported to confer resistance to antimicrobials that are widely used in veterinary medicine, such as macrolides, tetracyclines, phenicols, and lincosamides [5]. Previous studies have also shown the co-existence of the cfr gene and other resistance genes, which facilitates its co-selection and spread [26,32]. Moreover, six of the LR strains co-carried the mecA gene. The co-existence of the mecA and cfr genes is an unwelcome development because linezolid is among the last resort of antimicrobial agents against MRSA in humans.

2.3. Molecular Characteristics of LR S. aureus Isolates

The potential risk of transmission of cfr-carrying S. aureus between pigs and humans is a growing health concern. In this study, the 25 LR-isolates belonged to ST433-t318 (n = 6); ST541-t034 (n = 6); ST5-t002 (n = 4); ST9-t337 (n = 3); and each of ST5-t548, ST9-t899, ST398-t034, ST398-t1170, ST433-t021, and ST2007-t8314. Five of these lineage types (ST9, ST398, ST433, ST541, and ST2007) were livestock-associated (LA) strains, while ST5 S. aureus was the only human-associated (HA) strain. Except for ST2007, all the LA and HA strains were reported in pigs and farmers in Korea [19,33,34], indicating the possibility of transmission between pigs and humans. Korea is one of the markets with the fastest growing consumption of pork in the world. Hence, the emergence of cfr-carrying S. aureus with unique molecular characteristics in pig carcasses is concerning.
We identified LR S. aureus strains with sequence type (ST2007) and spa types (ST5-t548 and ST433-t318) that had not been reported in Korea, suggesting the emergence of new clones that carried the cfr gene and/or have mutations in ribosomal protein rplD. Although the linezolid resistance profiles are unknown, the ST5-t548 [35], ST433-t318 [36], and ST2007-t8314 [37] strains were detected in humans and/or pigs in China, Poland, and the United States, respectively. Moreover, we observed LR-ST398 S. aureus carrying a novel spa type (t1170) in farm GG-5, suggesting an evolutionary change in S. aureus.
Staphylococcal enterotoxin and leukotoxin-encoding genes, alone or in combination, were detected in 68% of LR isolates: seg (28%, 7/25), seg-sei-sem-sen-seo (24%, 6/25), and seg-sei-sem-sen-seo-lukED (16%, 4/25) (Table 2). Eight (32%) isolates, including the five MRSA strains, were negative for any of the tested virulence factor genes. In agreement with Price et al. [38], the HA-ST5 strains appeared to be more virulent than the LA strains. Additionally, multiple virulence factor genes were detected in one of the LA strains, ST9. S. aureus harboring the classical enterotoxins and leucotoxins can spread to humans either through contact or via the food chain and are capable of causing food-related illnesses in humans [39].
Analysis using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) revealed four distinct PFGE types, with identical PFGE types in isolates belonging to the same sequence types (Figure S1). Isolates from different farms in the same or different provinces presented identical or different PFGE patterns. These results might suggest cross-contamination in the slaughterhouse, or clonal dissemination and/or persistence of specific clones among farms, not only within a province but also in different provinces.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample Collection and Isolation of S. aureus

A total of 2547 S. aureus isolates (382 cattle, 1077 pig, and 1088 chicken carcass isolates) were obtained from 16 laboratories/centers participating in the Korean Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System. Sample collection and isolation of S. aureus were performed as described previously [19]. Briefly, the back and chest of cattle and pig carcasses were swabbed with sterile gauze pads wetted with buffered peptone water (BPW) (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA), while the whole carcasses of chickens were rinsed in Phosphate Buffered Water (PBW). Homogenized samples were inoculated into tryptic soy broth (Becton Dickinson) containing 6.5% sodium chloride and incubated at 37 ℃ for 16 h. Following incubation, one or two loops from each enrichment broth were streaked onto mannitol salt agar (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA). Suspected colonies were then identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Biomerieux, Marcy L’Etoile, France). S. aureus and MRSA isolates were further confirmed by a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay specific for the 16S rRNA, clfA, and mecA genes [40].

3.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Detection of Resistance Genes

Linezolid susceptibility was determined by the broth dilution method [41], using linezolid-containing plates (1–8 µg/mL) (EUST, TREK Diagnostics Systems, Cleveland, OH). The LR isolates were screened for the presence of cfr, fexA, optrA, and poxtA genes using PCR [6,42]. The susceptibility profiles of the identified LR isolates were further evaluated for the following 19 antimicrobial agents using antibiotic-containing plates (EUST, TREK Diagnostics Systems, Cleveland, OH): cefoxitin (0.5–16 µg/mL), chloramphenicol (4–64 µg/mL), ciprofloxacin (0.25–8 µg/mL), clindamycin (0.12–4 µg/mL), erythromycin (0.25–8 µg/mL), fusidic acid (0.5–4 µg/mL), gentamicin (1–32 µg/mL), kanamycin (4–64 µg/mL), mupirocin (0.5–256 µg/mL), penicillin (0.12–2 µg/mL), quinupristin/dalfopristin (0.5–4 µg/mL), rifampin (0.02–0.5 µg/mL), streptomycin (1–16 µg/mL), sulfamethoxazole (64–512 µg/mL), tetracycline (0.5–16 µg/mL), tiamulin (0.5–4 µg/mL), trimethoprim (2–32 µg/mL), and vancomycin (1–16 µg/mL). Briefly, approximately 5 × 105 colony forming unit (cfu)/mL inoculums, prepared from overnight cultures, were inoculated on the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) panels and incubated at 35 °C for 20–24 h. S. aureus ATCC 25,923 was used as a reference strain. The MIC values were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [41] and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [43] guidelines.

3.3. Detection of Mutations

The central loop of domain V of the 23S rRNA and the genes encoding ribosomal proteins L3 (rplC) and L4 (rplD) were amplified using primers, as described previously [17,32]. The nucleotide and amino acid sequences of rplC, rplD, and domain V of the 23S rRNA gene, for each of the isolates tested, were compared with those of the wild-type linezolid-susceptible S. aureus ATCC29213 strain (GenBank accession no. NZ_MOPB01000038.1). Analysis and comparison were performed using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) and ExPASY proteomics tools (http://www.expasy.ch/tools/#similarity).

3.4. Molecular Typing of LR S. aureus

The LR isolates were further characterized by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Sequences of the PCR products were compared with sequences available on the MLST website for S. aureus [44]. S. aureus protein A (spa) typing was performed using the method described by Enright et al. [45], and the spa types were assigned using the Ridom Staph Type server (Ridom GmbH, Wurzburg, Germany) (www.spaserver.ridom.de). Additionally, the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing was carried out in all LR isolates that harbored the mecA gene using PCR [46]. The detection of genes encoding the virulence determinants such as Panton–Valentine leucocidin (PVL), leukotoxins (lukED), exfoliatins (eta and etb), toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (tsst1), and staphylococcal enterotoxins (sea, seb, sec, sed, see, seg, seh, sei, selj, sek, sell, sem, sen, seo, sep, seq, and ser) was performed by PCR [47]. The isolates were also investigated for three genes (scn, chp, and sak) that represent components of the immune evasion cluster [48].
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of SmaI-digested chromosomal DNA was performed to investigate clonality [49]. Briefly, chromosomal DNA sample plugs were digested with 50 U of SmaI (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan) and separated by electrophoresis on 1.0% SeaKem Gold agarose (Lonza, Allendale, NJ, USA) in 0.5× Tris–borate–Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid EDTA buffer at 14 °C for 20 h using a CHEF-Mapper (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with the following parameters: initial switch time, 5.3 s; final switch time, 34.9 s; angle, 120°; gradient, 6.0 V/cm; ramping factor, linear. Results were analyzed using Bionumerics software, version 4.0 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium), and relatedness was calculated using the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) algorithm, on the basis of the Dice similarity index.

4. Conclusions

The occurrence of linezolid resistance is still rare among S. aureus isolates from animal carcasses. Nevertheless, we detected the multi-resistance gene cfr and the novel phenicol exporter gene fexA among all the LR S. aureus isolated from pigs. Mutations in ribosomal proteins rplC and rplD were also detected in some of the strains. Resistant strains could be transmitted to humans through the food supply chain, subsequently limiting the treatment options for multidrug-resistant S. aureus. Therefore, frequent screening of pig carcasses, farmers, and slaughterhouse environments, as well as thorough cooking of pig meat, should be implemented to detect the emergence and persistence of toxigenic and LR S. aureus strains in order to prevent dissemination to humans.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/11/769/s1, Figure S1: Sma I-digested pulse-field gel electrophoresis patterns of linezolid-resistant S. aureus isolated from pig carcasses in Korea. Genomic DNA of ST398 and ST541 are not digested by SmaI, and hence pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns were not determined.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-K.L., and D.C.M.; methodology, H.Y.K., A.F.M., and D.C.M.; software, A.F.M., H.Y.K., J.-H.C., and S.-J.K.; validation, A.F.M., M.H.K., and H.-J.S.; formal analysis, H.-J.S., and M.H.K.; investigation, A.F.M., H.Y.K., H.-J.S., M.H.K., J.-H.C., and S.-J.K.; data curation, D.C.M., and H-.J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Y.K., and A.F.M.; writing—review and editing, A.F.M., S.-S.Y., S.-K.L., and D.C.M.; supervision, S.-S.Y., S.-K.L., and D.C.M.; project administration, D.C.M. and H.Y.K.; funding acquisition; S.K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded from the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Korea, grant number N-1543081-2017-24-01.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Mendes, R.E.; Hogan, P.A.; Jones, R.N.; Sader, H.S.; Flamm, R.K. Surveillance for linezolid resistance via the Zyvoxw Annual Appraisal of Potency and Spectrum (ZAAPS) programme (2014): Evolving resistance mechanisms with stable susceptibility rates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 1860–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wang, Y.; Lv, Y.; Cai, J.; Schwarz, S.; Cui, L.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, R.; Li, J.; Zhao, Q.; He, T.; et al. A novel gene, optrA, that confers transferable resistance to oxazolidinones and phenicols and its presence in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium of human and animal origin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 2182–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Lobritz, M.; Hutton-Thomas, R.; Marshall, S.; Rice, L.B. Recombination proficiency influences frequency and locus of mutational resistance to linezolid in Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 3318–3320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Wolter, N.; Smith, A.M.; Farrell, D.J.; Klugman, K.P. Heterogeneous macrolide resistance and gene conversion in the pneumococcus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 359–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Toh, S.M.; Xiong, L.; Arias, C.A.; Villegas, M.V.; Lolans, K.; Quinn, J.; Mankin, A.S. Acquisition of a natural resistance gene renders a clinical strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus resistant to the synthetic antibiotic linezolid. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 64, 1506–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Wang, J.; Lin, D.C.; Guo, X.M.; Wei, H.K.; Liu, X.Q.; Chen, X.J.; Guo, J.Y.; Zeng, Z.L.; Liu, J.H. Distribution of the multidrug resistance gene cfr in Staphylococcus isolates from pigs, workers, and the environment of a hog market and a slaughterhouse in Guangzhou, China. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2015, 12, 598–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schwarz, S.; Werckenthin, C.; Kehrenberg, C. Identification of a plasmid borne chloramphenicol-florfenicol resistance gene in Staphylococcus sciuri. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 2530–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Mendes, R.E.; Deshpande, L.M.; Jones, R.N. Linezolid update: Stable in vitro activity following more than a decade of clinical use and summary of associated resistance mechanisms. Drug Resist. Updates 2014, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Shen, J.; Wang, Y.; Schwarz, S. Presence and dissemination of the multiresistance gene cfr in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 1697–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Long, K.S.; Poehlsgaard, J.; Kehrenberg, C.; Schwarz, S.; Vester, B. The cfr rRNA methyltransferase confers resistance to phenicols, lincosamides, oxazolidinones, pleuromutilins, and streptogramin A antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 2500–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wendlandt, S.; Shen, J.; Kadlec, K.; Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Zhang, W.J.; Feßler, A.T.; Wu, C.; Schwarz, S. Multidrug resistance genes in staphylococci from animals that confer resistance to critically and highly important antimicrobial agents in human medicine. Trends Microbiol. 2015, 23, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kosowska-Shick, K.; Julian, K.G.; McGhee, P.L.; Appelbaum, P.C.; Whitener, C.J. Molecular and epidemiologic characteristics of linezolid-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci at a tertiary care hospital. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2010, 68, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ross, J.E.; Farrell, D.J.; Mendes, R.E.; Sader, H.S.; Jones, R.N. Eight-year (2002–2009) summary of the Linezolid (Zyvox® annual appraisal of potency and spectrum; ZAAPS) program in European countries. J. Chemother. 2011, 23, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pekana, A.; Green, E. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from meat carcasses and bovine milk in abattoirs and dairy farms of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018, 15, 2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Li, D.; Wu, C.; Wang, Y.; Fan, R.; Schwarz, S.; Zhang, S. Identification of multiresistance gene cfr in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from pigs: Plasmid location and integration into a staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec complex. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 3641–3644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. An, D.; Lee, M.Y.; Jeong, T.D.; Sung, H.; Kim, M.N.; Hong, S.B. Co-emergence of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium in a patient with methicillin-resistant S. aureus pneumonic sepsis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2011, 69, 232–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yoo, I.Y.; Kang, O.K.; Shim, H.J.; Huh, H.J.; Lee, N.Y. Linezolid resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Korea: High rate of false resistance to linezolid by the VITEK 2 system. Ann. Lab. Med. 2020, 40, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Lim, S.K.; Nam, H.M.; Jang, G.C.; Kim, S.R.; Chae, M.H.; Jung, S.C.; Kang, D.; Kim, J. Antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw meats in slaughterhouse in Korea during 2010. Korean J. Vet. Publ. Health 2011, 35, 231–238. [Google Scholar]
  19. Moon, D.C.; Tamang, M.D.; Nam, H.M.; Jeong, J.H.; Jang, G.C.; Jung, S.C.; Park, Y.H.; Lim, S.K. Identification of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Korea and molecular comparison between isolates from animal carcasses and slaughterhouse workers. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2015, 12, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Farrell, D.J.; Mendes, R.E.; Ross, J.E.; Jones, R.N. Linezolid surveillance program results for 2008 (LEADER Program for 2008). Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009, 65, 392–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Jones, R.N.; Kohno, S.; Ono, Y.; Ross, J.E.; Yanagihara, K. ZAAPS International Surveillance Program (2007) for linezolid resistance: Results from 5591 Gram-positive clinical isolates in 23 countries. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009, 64, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tamang, M.D.; Moon, D.C.; Kim, S.R.; Kang, H.Y.; Lee, K.; Nam, H.M.; Jang, G.C.; Lee, H.S.; Jung, S.C.; Lim, S.K. Detection of novel oxazolidinone and phenicol resistance gene optrA in Enterococcal isolates from food animals and animal carcasses. Vet. Microbiol. 2017, 201, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Patel, S.N.; Memari, N.; Shahinas, D.; Toye, B.; Jamieson, F.B.; Farrell, D.J. Linezolid resistance in Enterococcus faecium isolated in Ontario, Canada. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 77, 350–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Stefani, S.; Bongiorno, D.; Mongelli, G.; Campanile, F. Linezolid resistance in staphylococci. Pharmaceuticals 2010, 3, 1988–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Argudín, M.A.; Tenhagen, B.A.; Fetsch, A.; Sachsenröder, J.; Käsbohrer, A.; Schroeter, A.; Hammer, J.A.; Hertwig, S.; Helmuth, R.; Bräunig, J.; et al. Virulence and resistance determinants of German Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolates from nonhuman sources. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3052–3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kehrenberg, C.; Cuny, C.; Strommenger, B.; Schwarz, S.; Witte, W. Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains of clonal lineages ST398 and ST9 from swine carry the multidrug resistance gene cfr. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 779–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. LaMarre, J.M.; Locke, J.B.; Shaw, K.J.; Mankin, A.S. Low fitness cost of the multidrug resistance gene cfr. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 3714–3719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Andersson, D.I.; Hughes, D. Antibiotic resistance and its cost: Is it possible to reverse resistance? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Foucault, M.L.; Depardieu, F.; Courvalin, P.; Grillot-Courvalin, C. Inducible expression eliminates the fitness cost of vancomycin resistance in enterococci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 16964–16969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rodriguez-Rojas, A.; Macia, M.D.; Couce, A.; Gomez, C.; Castaneda-Garcia, A.; Oliver, A.; Blazquez, J. Assessing the emergence of resistance: The absence of biological cost in vivo may compromise fosfomycin treatments for P. aeruginosa infections. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Locke, J.B.; Hilgers, M.; Shaw, K.J. Mutations in ribosomal protein L3 are associated with oxazolidinone resistance in Staphylococci of clinical origin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 5275–5278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Gales, A.C.; Deshpande, L.M.; De Souza, A.G.; Pignatari, A.C.C.; Mendes, R.E. MSSA ST398/t034 carrying a plasmid-mediated Cfr and Erm(B) in Brazil. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 303–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Lim, S.K.; Nam, H.M.; Jang, G.C.; Lee, H.S.; Jung, S.C.; Kwak, H.S. The first detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in pigs in Korea. Vet. Microbiol. 2012, 155, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Moon, D.C.; Jeong, S.K.; Hyun, B.H.; Lim, S.K. Prevalence and characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in pigs and pig farmers in Korea. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2019, 16, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, X.; Fang, F.; Zhao, J.; Lou, N.; Li, C.; Huang, T.; Li, Y. Molecular characteristics and virulence gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus causing bloodstream infection. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 22, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mroczkowska, A.; Zmudzki, J.; Marszaøek, N.; Orczykowska-Kotyna, M.; Komorowska, I.; Nowak, A.; Grzesiak, A.; Czyzewska-Dors, E.; Dors, A.; Pejsak, Z.; et al. Livestock-Associated Staphylococcus aureus on Polish pig farms. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Sun, J.; Yang, M.; Sreevatsan, S.; Bender, J.B.; Singer, R.S.; Knutson, T.P.; Marthaler, D.G.; Davies, P.R. Longitudinal study of Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in a cohort of swine veterinarians in the United States. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Price, L.B.; Stegger, M.; Hasman, H.; Aziz, M.; Larsen, J.; Andersen, P.S.; Pearson, T.; Waters, A.E.; Foster, J.T.; Schupp, J.; et al. Staphylococcus aureus CC398: Host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. MBio 2012, 3, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kérouanton, A.; Hennekinne, J.A.; Letertre, C.; Petit, L.; Chesneau, O.; Brisabois, A.; De Buyser, M.L. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains associated with food poisoning outbreaks in France. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 115, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mason, W.J.; Blevins, J.S.; Beenken, K.; Wibowo, N.; Ojha, N.; Smeltzer, M.S. Multiplex PCR protocol for the diagnosis of staphylococcal infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 3332–3338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twentieth Informational Supplement; CLSI Document; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2018; p. M100. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kehrenberg, C.; Schwarz, S. Distribution of florfenicol resistance genes fexA and cfr among chloramphenicol-resistant Staphylococcus isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1156–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters. 2018, Version 8.1. Available online: http://www.eucast.org (accessed on 7 July 2020).
  44. Staphylococcus aureus MLST Database. Available online: https://pubmlst.org/saureus/ (accessed on 9 August 2020).
  45. Enright, M.C.; Day, N.P.J.; Davies, C.E.; Peacock, S.J.; Spratt, B.G. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 1008–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Boyle-Vavra, S.; Daum, R.S. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: The role of Panton-Valentine leukocidin. Lab. Investig. 2007, 87, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Van Duijkeren, E.; Ikawaty, R.; Broekhuizen-Stins, M.J.; Jansen, M.D.; Spalburg, E.C.; de Neeling, A.J.; Allaart, J.G.; van Nes, A.; Wagenaar, J.A.; Fluit, A.C. Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains between different kinds of pig farms. Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 126, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sung, J.M.L.; Lloyd, D.H.; Lindsay, J.A. Staphylococcus aureus host specificity: Comparative genomics of human versus animal isolates by multi-strain microarray. Microbiology 2008, 154, 1949–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. McDougal, L.K.; Steward, C.D.; Killgore, G.E.; Chaitram, J.M.; McAllister, S.K.; Tenover, F.C. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: Establishing a national database. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 5113–5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Prevalence of linezolid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from food animal carcasses in South Korea from 2010 to 2017.
Table 1. Prevalence of linezolid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from food animal carcasses in South Korea from 2010 to 2017.
Year% (No. of Linezolid-Resistant Isolates/No. of Isolates)
CattlePigChickenTotal
20100 (0/39)0 (0/70)0 (0/81)0 (0/190)
20110 (0/69)0 (0/101)0 (0/137)0 (0/307)
20120 (0/76)9.8 (12/122)0 (0/201)3 (12/399)
20130 (0/49)1.7 (3/178)0 (0/133)0.8 (3/360)
20140 (0/62)1.1 (2/182)0 (0/168)0.5 (2/412)
20150 (0/41)2.5 (4/160)0 (0/195)1 (4/396)
20160 (0/29)1.9 (3/158)0 (0/77)1.1 (3/264)
20170 (0/17)0.9 (1/106)0 (0/96)0.5 (1/219)
Total0 (0/382)2.3 (25/1077)0 (0/1088)1.0 (25/2547)
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of linezolid-resistant S. aureus isolated from pig carcasses.
Table 2. Characteristics of linezolid-resistant S. aureus isolated from pig carcasses.
IsolateYearProvincesFarm IDMIC (µg/mL)Other Resistance PhenotypeGenetic Resistance MarkerMLSTSpa TypeSCCmec TypeVirulence PatternsPulso Type
LNZCHLCLITIASYNmecAcfrfexAoptrApoxtA23S rRNArplCrplD
V02-12-0232012GyeonggiGG-18>64>4>4>4ERY, GEN, KAN, PEN, TMP-++--WTWTWT5t002-seg-sei-sem-sen-seoA
V02-12-0272012ChungnamCN-18>64>4>44FOX, PEN, TET+++--WTWTWT398t034V ND
V04-12-0052012ChungnamCN-216>64>4>42GEN, KAN, PEN, TET-++- WTWTWT5t002-seg-sei-sem-sen-seo-lukEDA
V08-12-0022012GyeongbukGB-18>64>4>4>4FOX, CIP, ERY, GEN, KAN, PEN, TET+++--WTWTWT541t034V ND
V13-12-0132012GyeongbukGB-216>64>4>44GEN, KAN, PEN, TET-++--WTWTC353T433t318-segB
V14-12-0012012ChungnamCN-38>64>4>44TET-++--WTWTC353T433t318-segB
V14-12-0082012ChungnamCN-316>64>4>44FOX, ERY, PEN, TET+++--WTWTWT541t034V ND
V14-12-0112012GyeonggiGG-216>64>4>42FOX, ERY, PEN, TET+++--WTWTWT541t034V ND
V14-12-0122012IncheonIC-18>64>4>4>4FOX, ERY, PEN, TET+++--WTWTWT541t034V ND
V14-12-0152012ChungnamCN-48>64>4>4>4CIP, ERY, GEN, KAN, PEN, TET, TMP-++--WTWTWT541t034- ND
V14-12-0162012ChungnamCN-516>64>4>44--++--WTWTC353T433t318-segB
V14-12-0172012GyeonggiGG-316>64>4>44--++--WTWTC353T433t318-segB
V04-13-0192013ChungbukCB-116>64>4>44PEN-++--WTWTWT9t337-seg-sei-sem-sen-seoC
V04-13-0322013ChungnamCN-616>64>4>44PEN-++--WTWTWT9t337-seg-sei-sem-sen-seoC
V08-13-0032013GyeongbukGB-38>64>4>44PEN-++--WTWTWT5t548-seg-sei-sem-sen-seo-lukEDA
V04-14-0232014ChungbukCB-28>64>4>42PEN-++--WTG121AWT5t002-seg-sei-sem-sen-seo-lukEDA-1
V14-14-0062014ChungnamCN-78>64>4>44CIP, GEN, KAN, PEN-++--WTWTC353T433t318-segB
V02-15-0072015GyeonggiGG-48>64>4>42GEN, KAN, PEN-++--WTWTWT2007t8314-seg-sei-sem-sen-seoD
V14-15-0022015IncheonIC-28>64>4>42TET-++--WTWTC353T433t318-segB
V14-15-0162015IncheonIC-38>64>4>4>4FOX, ERY, PEN, TET+++--WTWTWT541t034V ND
V15-15-0122015JeonnamJN-18>64>4>44PEN-++--WTWTWT9t337-seg-sei-sem-sen-seoC
V03-16-0032016GangwonGW-18>64>4>44GEN, KAN, PEN-++--WTWTWT5t002-seg-sei-sem-sen-seo-lukEDA
V06-16-0072016JeonbukJB-18>64>4>42PEN, TET-++--WTWTWT9t899-seg-sei-sem-sen-seoC-1
V14-16-0042016GyeonggiGG-58>64>4>44CIP, ERY, PEN, TET, TMP-++--WTWTWT398t1170- ND
V13-17-0112017GyeongbukGB-4864>4>44--++--WTWTC353T433t021-segB
Abbreviations: LNZ, linezolid; CHL, chloramphenicol; CLI, clindamycin; TIA, tiamulin; SYN, quinupristin/dalfopristin; FOX, cefoxitin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; ERY, erythromycin; GEN, gentamicin; KAN, kanamycin; PEN, penicillin; TET, tetracycline; TMP, trimethoprim; WT, wild type; MLST, multi-locus sequence type. SCCmec typing was performed for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains only.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, H.Y.; Moon, D.C.; Mechesso, A.F.; Choi, J.-H.; Kim, S.-J.; Song, H.-J.; Kim, M.H.; Yoon, S.-S.; Lim, S.-K. Emergence of cfr-Mediated Linezolid Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Pig Carcasses. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 769. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110769

AMA Style

Kang HY, Moon DC, Mechesso AF, Choi J-H, Kim S-J, Song H-J, Kim MH, Yoon S-S, Lim S-K. Emergence of cfr-Mediated Linezolid Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Pig Carcasses. Antibiotics. 2020; 9(11):769. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110769

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Hee Young, Dong Chan Moon, Abraham Fikru Mechesso, Ji-Hyun Choi, Su-Jeong Kim, Hyun-Ju Song, Mi Hyun Kim, Soon-Seek Yoon, and Suk-Kyung Lim. 2020. "Emergence of cfr-Mediated Linezolid Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Pig Carcasses" Antibiotics 9, no. 11: 769. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110769

APA Style

Kang, H. Y., Moon, D. C., Mechesso, A. F., Choi, J. -H., Kim, S. -J., Song, H. -J., Kim, M. H., Yoon, S. -S., & Lim, S. -K. (2020). Emergence of cfr-Mediated Linezolid Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Pig Carcasses. Antibiotics, 9(11), 769. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110769

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop