Next Article in Journal
Microbe Interactions within the Skin Microbiome
Previous Article in Journal
Determining Susceptibility and Potential Mediators of Resistance for the Novel Polymyxin Derivative, SPR206, in Acinetobacter baumannii
Previous Article in Special Issue
Racial Disparities in Periprosthetic Joint Infections after Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Validation of a Classification System for Optimal Application of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Prosthetic Joint Infections following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Review

Antibiotics 2024, 13(1), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13010048
by Joyee Tseng, Victoria Oladipo, Siddhartha Dandamudi, Conor M. Jones and Brett R. Levine *
Reviewer 2:
Antibiotics 2024, 13(1), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13010048
Submission received: 24 November 2023 / Revised: 26 December 2023 / Accepted: 2 January 2024 / Published: 4 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This is a paper on validation of IOA socring system for DAIR in acute and late acute PJIs.

Overall excellent work. Only small comments:

1- Tittle: do no use DAIR in tittle. 

2- Material and methods: in statistical section there is no mention of the p value used to consider statistical significance. I'm gessing P value<0.05?

3- Results: all p values should be written in italics in all text and tables. (for exemple: 197.9 ± 120.2 vs 142.2 ± 98.1 years, p = 0.016)

4- Tables: I recommend to mark in bold letters those p values that reach statistical significance. It makes is more easy to the reader. 

5- Discussion: page 7 line 208--> et all. is missing ("Rudelli et al.") , also reference 37 is missing.

Author Response

We updated the title, clarified the p value levels and made sure the pvalues stand out appropriately.  We updated reference 37 and added the authors.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The paper presents a classification system of patients depending on age, stage of infection, infection organism and health for the application of DAIR in prosthetic joint infections. 

It is well presented and easy to follow. Although there are drawbacks in the study, these are listed in the limitations and for future study purposes. For further research, it would be beneficial to study in a boarder population at a wide age groups and in multiple clinical settings. 

Overall, the system is useful for an initial assessment of patients that would require DAIR.

Author Response

We updated all points of both reviewers to make this a stronger manuscript.  See the attached letter for detailed points.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop