Next Article in Journal
Advances in Hydrogel-Integrated SERS Platforms: Innovations, Applications, Challenges, and Future Prospects in Food Safety Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Electrochemical Sensor Platform for Rapid Detection of Foodborne Toxins
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plasmonic Biosensors in Cancer-Associated miRNA Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Colorimetric Biosensors: Advancements in Nanomaterials and Cutting-Edge Detection Strategies

School of Chemical Engineering, Clean Energy Research Center, Jeonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si 54896, Jeonbuk State, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2025, 15(6), 362; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15060362
Submission received: 18 April 2025 / Revised: 29 May 2025 / Accepted: 3 June 2025 / Published: 5 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Materials for Biosensing Applications)

Abstract

Colorimetric-based biosensors are practical detection devices that can detect the presence and concentration of biomarkers through simple color changes. Conventional laboratory-based tests are highly sensitive but require long processing times and expensive equipment, which makes them difficult to apply for on-site diagnostics. In contrast, the colorimetric method offers advantages for point-of-care testing and real-time monitoring due to its flexibility, simple operation, rapid results, and versatility across many applications. In order to enhance the color change reactions in colorimetric techniques, functional nanomaterials are often integrated due to their desirable intrinsic properties. In this review, the working principles of nanomaterial-based detection strategies in colorimetric systems are introduced. In addition, current signal amplification methods for colorimetric biosensors are comprehensively outlined and evaluated. Finally, the latest trends in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning integration into colorimetric-based biosensors, including their potential for technological advancements in the near future, are discussed. Future research is expected to develop highly sensitive and multifunctional colorimetric methods, which will serve as powerful alternatives for point-of-care testing and self-testing.

1. Introduction

Biosensors have made significant progress with the development of nanomaterials and the innovation of application technology [1,2,3]. The early generation of biosensors relied on simple enzyme-based or antibody-based systems, but they are now developing into ultrasensitive biosensors that combine various high-quality nanomaterials, such as metal nanoparticles, graphene, and nanoplasmonic structures [4,5]. Many different nanomaterials are used in the study of biosensors, specifically for colorimetric biosensors [6]. Colorimetric biosensors can detect reactions with specific analytes through color changes and make simple as well as instantaneous diagnostic methods possible [7,8,9].
With the increasing demand for fast and cost-effective detection methods, colorimetric biosensors are receiving much attention due to their unique properties, such as simple visual detection, high sensitivity, and minimization of device dependence. Specifically, in clinical and on-site fields, an immediate, highly sensitive, and affordable sensing system is imperative for diagnosis. However, until now, achieving the stated criteria has remained a key challenge [10,11]. As an alternative, point-of-care testing (POCT) allows for rapid diagnosis and treatment decisions in areas that lack infrastructure; thus, they can facilitate a rapid diagnosis for the early detection and isolation of infectious diseases [12,13]. Moreover, colorimetric biosensors can streamline chronic disease management by reducing time, manpower, and medical costs compared to laboratory testing. Traditional analysis methods provide high precision but require complex equipment with high costs and long analysis times, which limit their use in POCT [6,14]. Colorimetric biosensors, on the other hand, can rapidly and easily detect target analytes using an intuitive signaling mechanism called color change.
Recently, nanoplasmonic colorimetric biosensors have dramatically improved their sensitivity for the detection of trace amounts of analytes by utilizing optical properties such as local surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) [15]. LSPR-based colorimetric research primarily involves noble metal nanoparticles, such as gold (Au) and silver (Ag). In particular, the sensitive LSPR effect is being studied by altering the size, shape, and surrounding environment of these nanoparticles [16]. In addition, researchers are focusing on the use of nanomagnets in colorimetric biosensors, which are reported to be more stable and reproducible than conventional protein enzymes. Nanomagnets are actively researched due to their advantages, which include higher stability, lower production costs, various catalytic functions, and longer shelf life compared to conventional enzymes [17]. Ultimately, proving a nanotechnology-combined colorimetric biosensor is expected to enhance sensitivity and selectivity, which enables the detection of trace amounts of analytes. This could further improve POCT and increase the access to medical care in underdeveloped areas by providing quick results with simple equipment [18,19].
Although various sensitivity enhancement techniques have been developed, the colorimetric method still has limitations of being less sensitive and having interference in quantitative analyses compared to other sensing techniques [20]. In order to overcome this limitation, research is actively conducted to integrate and utilize the colorimetric method and other signal conversion methods, such as fluorescence, electrochemical, and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) signal enhancement methods [21,22,23]. These complex sensing techniques not only improve the sensitivity of the colorimetric method but also enable real-time monitoring and more precise quantitative analyses [24]. In particular, a dual sensing system improves accuracy by combining color change in a colorimetric analysis with other enhancement signals, such as fluorescence and electrochemical signals, for a refined quantitative analysis [25,26].
Moreover, a colorimetric analysis using smartphone cameras provides more accurate results by quantitatively analyzing red, green, and blue (RGB) values [27,28,29]. In recent years, the integration of machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) platforms into colorimetric methods has further improved analytical precision and automated data interpretation. AI is addressing the limitations of traditional colorimetric methods by learning RGB values and color change patterns [30]. These smart devices and AI-based analysis technologies are accelerating the development of next-generation biosensors, such as wearable healthcare, rapid diagnosis, and smartphone-linked biosensors [31,32]. In the future, biosensors with higher sensitivity, reliability, and portability will be developed through convergence with AI. It is expected that personalized medical care and real-time monitoring will then be implemented more precisely.
Despite the advantages of nanomaterial-based colorimetric biosensors for their high sensitivity and easy visual reading, there are still several limitations in clinical applications. Most studies remain at the laboratory level and face various limitations, such as complexity in real biological environments, reducing reproducibility of clinical samples, and the possibility of biological interference in nanomaterials [33,34,35]. In addition, the absence of standardized clinical verification protocols, the instability of material synthesis, and the lack of proactive engagement between material scientists and clinicians are also major factors that hinder clinical translation [36,37,38,39,40]. To solve these problems, an integrated collaboration system from basic research to clinical verification and participation in the initial design stage of clinical trials is essential.
This review provides an overview of the working principles of colorimetric biosensors for analytical and detection applications, nanoparticle-based methods, and recent developments. It will specifically outline interaction principles such as aggregation, redox reactions, and shifts in plasmonic resonances. In addition, studies highlighting the roles of nanoparticles, including Au, Ag, and quantum dots (QDs), in colorimetric methods will be discussed. Finally, this review will summarize future prospects for colorimetric methods, with an emphasis on sensitivity improvement strategies through the incorporation of digital devices and AI.

2. Principles of Colorimetric Sensing

Fluctuations in the chemical composition or surrounding environment of nanoparticles can lead to changes in their optical properties and color [41]. In some colorimetric sensors, the color change is induced by the LSPR phenomenon, where free electrons around specific metal nanoparticles, such as Au or Ag, oscillate collectively in response to incident light [42]. The resonance conditions of LSPR can be adjusted based on factors such as size, shape, composition, refractive index change in the surrounding medium, and interactions between nanoparticles. These factors lead to color changes, which are characterized by alterations in the absorption and scattering spectra [43,44,45]. Nevertheless, apart from LSPR, colorimetric reactions can also be induced by other mechanisms, depending on the sensor design and the nanomaterials used [46]. For example, strategies such as color change via oxidation and reduction reactions of peroxidase, pH variation, and interactions with ions or biomolecules are commonly employed in colorimetric biosensors [47,48,49]. This section of the review will further clarify the optical and chemical principles underlying colorimetry. A detailed list of the principles of colorimetric biosensors is presented (Table 1).

2.1. LSPR-Based Colorimetric Biosensors

When specific metal nanoparticles are exposed to light, their free electrons resonate with the external electric field and oscillate. During this process, the collective oscillation of electrons inside the nanoparticle at a particular frequency causes strong absorption and scattering at a specific wavelength. This resonance phenomenon represents LSPR, which depends on the nanoparticle’s size, shape, and the refractive index of the surrounding medium [50,51]. Due to its sensitivity to the surrounding environment, LSPR is utilized in various biosensing platforms for signal amplification and colorimetric detection [52]. LSPR-based sensors have attracted attention due to their high sensitivity and simple analytical procedures, wherein, depending on how the LSPR changes, they can be classified into aggregation-based sensors and refractive index-based sensors [46].
In the field of colorimetric biosensors, color changes due to the aggregation of noble metal nanoparticles are commonly utilized [51,52,53]. It mainly comprises colloidal noble metal nanoparticles, and aggregation between the nanoparticles is induced through specific interactions with target molecules [46]. Moreover, as the interparticle distance decreases, near-field electromagnetic coupling causes the LSPR peak to shift toward longer wavelengths, which results in a visible color change of the solution [54,55]. For example, colorimetric biosensors that utilize the color change from red to purple due to Au nanoparticle aggregation have been studied (Figure 1a) [52,56]. The visible color change not only enhances the sensor’s sensitivity but also enables naked-eye detection, which makes it suitable for POCT without the need for sophisticated instruments [57].
On the other hand, refractive index-based sensors involve the arrangement of metal nanoparticles on a fixed substrate, followed by the immobilization of biomolecules on their surfaces. In short, the binding with target molecules causes a change in the local refractive index around the nanoparticles [46,58]. Upon binding, the LSPR conditions change, and the signal is quantitatively measured by the movement of the absorption spectrum or the change in intensity [59,60,61]. In other words, LSPR-based sensors are not necessarily adapted for their ability to produce a color change [62]. Overall, LSPR is an optical phenomenon that is highly sensitive to changes in electron density distribution and the local refractive index on the surface of metal nanoparticles. These signals can be detected in various ways, including measurements of absorbance intensity, resonance wavelength shift, scattering intensity, and color changes [60,63]. As a result, LSPR-based sensors are widely used in both colorimetric and spectroscopy-based quantitative analyses [64].
In colorimetric methods, plasmonic nanoparticles, including Au, Ag, and alloys, are integrated based on the experimental design, as each metal has unique plasmonic properties with distinct advantages and disadvantages [65,66,67]. Advances in technology have enabled the fabrication of plasmonic metal nanostructures in nanometer sizes with specific shapes. [68,69]. The fabrication of metal nanoparticles is crucial, as the shape directly affects the resonance conditions and optical response of the nanoparticles [70]. For example, an increase in highly curved regions, such as sharp tips, leads to strong local electric field enhancement in response to external electromagnetic fields, which promotes the charge separation of free electrons [71]. Several forms of Au nanoparticles have been reported, including gold nanospheres, gold nanorods (AuNRs), and gold nanobipyramids (AuNBPs). Typically, gold nanostars (AuNSs) exhibit the lowest LSPR sensitivity—mainly due to the lack of sharp edges or tips [72]. In a study, Liebtrau et al. analyzed LSPR and electron–photon interactions with AuNSs with 50 nm cores and 3 nm tips. The contrasting roles of the core and the tip in the plasmonic nanostructures confirm the formation of the strongest electric field at the tip experimentally [73]. While the tips of AuNSs can positively affect the plasmonic properties, in general, caution should be taken when synthesizing the nanoparticles because AuNSs are very unstable [74].
Moreover, the symmetry of the nanoparticles affects the consistency and resonance efficiency of collective electron oscillations, which directly relates to LSPR signal strength [75]. In short, nanoparticle structures with a high symmetry allow for a strong electric field concentration. Depending on the polarization of incident light in a specific direction, the collective oscillations of electrons under resonance conditions are more aligned and remain stable. This, in turn, increases scattering and absorption signals [76]. Thus, a structure with high symmetry exhibits a stronger LSPR response and can contribute to the improvement of sensor sensitivity [77].
Finally, changes in the surrounding environment of the nanoparticles also affect the LSPR phenomenon [46,78]. Takahata et al. synthesized ultrathin gold nanorods (AuUNRs) with diameters below 2 nm by slowly reducing gold using the surfactant oleylamine (OA). As the aspect ratio (AR) of the nanorods increased, the LSPR exhibited a red shift. Moreover, when the surface ligand was changed from OA to glutathione (GSH) or dodecanethiol (C12SH), a blue shift in the LSPR was observed (Figure 1b) [79].
Toh et al. studied the effect of pH changes on LSPR, wherein after functionalizing the surface of AuNRs with 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (11-MUA), a redshift of approximately 10.5 nm occurred at a high pH due to deprotonation of the carboxyl group (-COOH). In contrast, the neutral control group did not respond to pH changes, which confirms the suitability of this system for pH detection (Figure 1c) [80]. In conclusion, this section deals with the principles of LSPR phenomena and the properties of nanoparticles influencing them as a basis for understanding the operating principles of colorimetric biosensors.
Figure 1. LSPR-based colorimetric biosensors. (a) A colorimetric sensing system based on enzyme-induced gold nanoparticle aggregation to detect the activity of alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Reproduced with permission from [56]. (b) Schematic illustrating the LSPR wavelength as a function of the aspect ratio for ultrathin gold nanorods. Reproduced with permission from [79]. (c) Representation of the electron-pulling force on GNR-MUA, inducing a blue or red wavelength shift of LSPR at low and high pH, respectively. Reproduced with permission from [80].
Figure 1. LSPR-based colorimetric biosensors. (a) A colorimetric sensing system based on enzyme-induced gold nanoparticle aggregation to detect the activity of alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Reproduced with permission from [56]. (b) Schematic illustrating the LSPR wavelength as a function of the aspect ratio for ultrathin gold nanorods. Reproduced with permission from [79]. (c) Representation of the electron-pulling force on GNR-MUA, inducing a blue or red wavelength shift of LSPR at low and high pH, respectively. Reproduced with permission from [80].
Biosensors 15 00362 g001

2.2. Redox Reaction-Based Colorimetric Biosensors

Colorimetry is an analytical technique that quantitatively determines the presence or concentration of specific substances by observing color changes in a sample. The method uses not only the principles of LSPR but also various other colorimetric mechanisms [81,82,83]. The commonly used mechanism is based on redox reactions, where a substrate undergoes a color change as it is either oxidized or reduced [84]. A redox reaction is an electron-transfer process where one molecule is oxidized by losing electrons and another is reduced by gaining electrons [85].
HRP enzymes are the most widely used enzymes that induce the oxidation of substrates [86,87]. HRP utilizes H2O2 as an electron acceptor to receive and oxidize electrons from substrates. The results of this reaction can be visually confirmed, as the oxidized substrates cause a color change [88]. Similarly, there are many studies on glucose detection based on colorimetric methods, where glucose is oxidized by glucose oxidase to generate H2O2, which is then used by peroxidase (or peroxidase-mimicking nanozymes) to catalyze a color-producing reaction [89,90]. Enzyme-based colorimetric reactions are highly sensitive to experimental conditions, such as pH, temperature, and catalyst concentration, all of which significantly alter the efficiency and accuracy of the reaction [91,92].
The most widely used substrates in redox-based colorimetric analyses include TMB and ABTS (2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzenine-6-sulfonic acid) [93,94]. These compounds act as electron donors in redox reactions and are converted into colored products with specific absorbance peaks upon oxidation. TMB, for instance, is a colorless reduced form chemical that, in the presence of HRP and H2O2, is oxidized to a blue-colored intermediate, which can further be converted into a yellow oxidized form using excess oxidants. The absorbance is typically measured at 652 nm or 450 nm, and the intensity correlates with the degree of substrate oxidation (Figure 2b) [95,96]. ABTS also shows a blue-green color upon oxidation and is known for providing faster and more stable colorimetric reactions [97,98].
In the study of Chen et al., AuNPs, by removing electrons and protons from glucose, convert glucose into gluconic acid, and the removed electrons follow the dehydrogenation reaction pathway delivered to electron acceptors, such as oxygen or ABTS+• [89]. As a practical application of redox-based colorimetric reactions, Deshmukh et al. demonstrated that eco-friendly synthesized gold nanoparticles with gallnut extract (GNE-based AuNPs) have the multienzyme mimetic activity of glucose oxidase and peroxidase. These AuNPs first perform oxidase-mimicking reactions, which oxidize glucose into gluconic acid and H2O2 using oxygen as an electron acceptor. Then, the end product of glucose oxidation, H2O2, oxidizes TMB by peroxidase-mimicking reactions to produce blue-colored oxidized TMB (oxTMB) [99].
As another example, Bai et al. conducted a BRCA1 gene mutation detection study by focusing on the catalytic activity of bismuth selenide–gold nanoparticle (Bi2Se3-AuNP) nanocomposites that combine AuNPs and Bi2Se3 nanomaterials. In their study, Bi2Se3-AuNPs catalyze the reduction of 4-nitrophenol(4-NP) to 4-aminophenol(4-AP), wherein the Bi2Se3 nanosheets are easily oxidized to topological insulators, while the AuNPs supported on their surface can effectively transfer electrons due to AuNPs being excellent electron transfer agents, further promoting the reduction reaction of 4-NP and amplifying the colorimetric signal significantly. It can be seen that the catalytic activity of Bi2Se3-AuNP changes the color of 4-NP from bright yellow to colorless with a UV–vis spectrum change [100].
The redox principle described above also explains the colorimetric mechanism of nanozymes, which mimic natural enzyme activities [101,102]. Natural enzymes have undesired properties such as low stability, easy denaturation and deactivation, high production cost, and difficulty to recycle. In contrast, nanozymes have gained attention in biosensors and diagnostic applications due to their structural stability, low cost, tunable catalytic activity, and ease of surface modification [103,104]. Nanozymes can be categorized into various types, such as carbon-based, metal-based, metal oxide- or sulfide-based, metal–organic framework (MOF)-based, covalent–organic framework (COF)-based, and single-atom nanozymes [105]. For example, Liu et al. developed a pesticide detection system that employs the oxidase-mimetic catalytic activity of cerium-based coordination polymer nanoparticles (CPNs(IV)). These CPNs(IV) oxidized TMB, which produced a blue-colored signal [21].
In addition to redox-based mechanisms, hydrolysis, pH changes, and coordination complex formation are also employed in colorimetric biosensing [83,106,107]. For instance, ALP induces color changes by hydrolyzing phosphorylated substrates rather than undergoing direct redox reactions (Figure 2c) [106,108]. The enzyme binds to the substrate and forms colored products that enable colorimetric detection [108]. pH-based colorimetric detection uses pH indicators that change color in response to acidity or alkalinity, which provides a simple visual readout [109]. For example, phenol red appears yellow in low pH and red in high pH conditions, which makes it ideal for detecting biochemical reactions that involve pH changes (Figure 2d) [110]. Another example involves the use of Zn2+ ions and the ligand 5-Br-PAPS (5-bromo-2-pyridylazo-5-diethylaminophenol), which form a magenta-colored coordination complex, enabling the visual detection of zinc ion concentrations [111]. This section discusses the basic principles of oxidation–reduction reactions that act as signal generation mechanisms for colorimetric biosensors and how they work. In subsequent sections, we will further explore examples of colorimetric principles based on LSPR and redox reactions using various nanoparticles.
Figure 2. Redox reaction-based colorimetric biosensors. (a) Colorimetric detection of BRCA1 mutation using Bi2Se3-AuNPs, which catalyze the reduction of 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) to 4-aminophenol (4-AP). Reproduced with permission from [100]. (b) Colorimetric mechanism of the proposed NEQ-IA based on AuNR oxidation by TMB2+, which enables multicolor display. Reproduced with permission from [96]. (c) Colorimetric sensing system utilizing the coordination chemistry between ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (AAP) and copper ions. Reproduced with permission from [108]. (d) CRISPR/Cas12a-based system that uses the enzyme urease for the accurate and sensitive detection of ASFV. Reproduced with permission from [110].
Figure 2. Redox reaction-based colorimetric biosensors. (a) Colorimetric detection of BRCA1 mutation using Bi2Se3-AuNPs, which catalyze the reduction of 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) to 4-aminophenol (4-AP). Reproduced with permission from [100]. (b) Colorimetric mechanism of the proposed NEQ-IA based on AuNR oxidation by TMB2+, which enables multicolor display. Reproduced with permission from [96]. (c) Colorimetric sensing system utilizing the coordination chemistry between ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (AAP) and copper ions. Reproduced with permission from [108]. (d) CRISPR/Cas12a-based system that uses the enzyme urease for the accurate and sensitive detection of ASFV. Reproduced with permission from [110].
Biosensors 15 00362 g002

3. Nanomaterials-Based Colorimetric Biosensors

3.1. LSPR-Based Colorimetric Sensing

In recent research on colorimetric biosensors, various nanoparticles have been used as signal probes [81,112,113]. Because LSPR is sensitive to small environmental changes, the use of noble metal nanoparticles, such as Au and Ag, allows for fast, simple, and highly sensitive sensing [114]. Apart from noble metal nanoparticles, 2D nanomaterials and LSPR can be combined and used as optical probes for biosensors. The 2D nanomaterials feature atomic-scale thickness with unique electronic, optical, and mechanical properties [115]. The synergy between 2D nanomaterials and LSPR was shown to improve optical sensing [116]. In this section, we will discuss recent studies on colorimetric biosensors utilizing various noble metal nanoparticles and 2D nanomaterials based on LSPR principles.

3.1.1. Noble Metal-Based Colorimetric Biosensors

In recent studies on colorimetric biosensors, various types of nanoparticles were actively utilized as probes for signal amplification and detection [117]. Li et al. developed a simple and portable Au-on-Au tip sensor for the specific, sensitive, and colorimetric detection of Salmonella Typhimurium. This sensor utilized the enzymatic cleavage reaction of Salmonella Typhimurium RNase H2 (STH2), which cleaves explicitly a nucleotide sequence. More specifically, the researchers linked DNA1 to an Au-coated layer inside a pipette tip and connected AuNP-DNA2 via a newly synthesized nucleic acid probe (NAP). In the presence of Salmonella, STH2 cleaved the NAP, which released AuNPs from the pipette tip and generated a visible colorimetric signal. This sensor is reusable and demonstrated a detection sensitivity of 3.2 × 103 CFU/mL for Salmonella [118].
The size and shape of the nanoparticles used for the LSPR-based detection influence the sensor’s sensitivity, so these factors must be carefully considered [119]. For example, silver nanoprisms (AgNPRs) are highly attractive due to their unique plasmonic and optical properties, which differ from those of conventional Au and Ag nanoparticles commonly used in colorimetric biosensing applications. Hence, Li et al. developed a rapid, sensitive, and selective colorimetric detection platform for biothiols in human serum by using AgNPRs. Target biothiols form Ag-S covalent bonds on the AgNPR surface, preventing the etching by chloride ions (Cl) present in human serum, which results in a blue-violet color.
In contrast, in the absence of biothiols, the AgNPRs underwent an etching process that led to a color change from blue-violet to yellow. The results indicate the presence or absence of biothiols. The LOD of biothiols, achieved through this platform, was 0.041 µM [120]. Au and Ag nanoparticles are predominantly used in optical colorimetric methods, and their plasmonic resonance properties vary depending on their shape and size, which enables diverse sensing applications [121,122,123]. Sensitive colorimetric sensors can be developed using LSPR in AgNPs. However, AgNPs suffer from instability due to surface oxidation and Ag+ ion release, which decreases their effectiveness as sensing materials [124]. To overcome this limitation, Qiu et al. designed and utilized Au@Ag@AgCl core–shell nanoparticles. By decorating Ag into AgCl, the group improved the stability, while positioning Au at the core helped maintain the sensor performance (Figure 3a). The selective etching of AgCl and the Ag shell by NH3 exposed the underlying Au and Ag, which induces LSPR signal changes and allows colorimetric detection through the naked eye. The LOD of NH3 obtained in this study was 6.4 µM (approximately 14.3 ppm), which is significantly lower than in other studies [125].
Based on published research, colorimetric lateral flow immunoassays (CM-LFIAs) have desirable properties, such as simplicity, portability, rapid results, and cost-effectiveness, that make them suitable for early disease diagnosis, environmental monitoring, and food-safety testing. However, AuNPs, which are commonly used in CM-LFIA, exhibit insufficient colorimetric signal brightness [126]. Alloyed nanoparticles have gained significant attention due to their unique optical and photothermal properties [127]. To address this problem, Zhang et al. developed alloyed bimetallic Ag–Au urchin-like hollow nanospheres (BUHNPs). BUHNPs exhibit superior colorimetric signal brightness, strong photothermal signals, and high antibody binding efficiency (Figure 3b). Based on BUHNPs, a colorimetric LFIA (BUHNP-CM) was developed for the sensitive detection of pathogenic bacteria. The quantified LOD of this colorimetric system was 2.48 × 103 CFU/mL—approximately four times lower than that of conventional AuNPs-LFIA (9.92 × 103 CFU/mL) [126]. As demonstrated, optical probes for colorimetric signals can indeed induce spectral and color changes depending on the composition and ratio of the nanoparticles. In this section, the operation principle and performance improvement strategy were examined, focusing on various colorimetric biosensor research cases using LSPR nanoparticles, and these cases suggest the practical applicability and advancement direction of the technology. A detailed list of colorimetric biosensors with noble metal-based nanoparticles is presented (Table 2).

3.1.2. Noble Metal-Decorated 2D Nanomaterial-Based Colorimetric Biosensors

Since 2D materials have desirable properties, such as a unique electronic structure, strong light absorption, and high mobility, their combination with metal nanoparticles can further enhance the sensitivity of LSPR [128]. Specifically, changing the structure of spherical silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) to 2D-like silver nanoparticles alters the LSPR response. The spherical AgNPs show a plasmon peak near 400 nm, which means that the LSPR peak is red-shifted via shape transformation to the nanoplates, underlining the importance of the 2D structure [129].
Due to their excellent properties, graphene-based materials find excellent applications in various biosensing and bioelectronics applications [130]. The study by Barghouti et al. shows the interaction of gold nanoparticles with a graphene film. The change in LSPR is shown to depend on the thickness of the graphene layer (ranging from 0.34 nm to 5 nm). It was confirmed that the resonance wavelength of SiOx/AuNPs/SiOx (574.71 nm) shifts to 657.90 nm when the graphene film is incorporated (SiOx/AuNPs/Graphene/SiOx) [131]. Rostami et al. proposed a novel plasmonic sensing platform that uses plasmon hybridization in a graphene nanoribbon/silver nanoparticle (GNR/AgNP) hybrid for the sequential colorimetric detection of dopamine (DA) and GSH. The DA etched the AgNPs, which caused a blue shift and a color change from green to red. In contrast, GSH induced the aggregation of AgNPs, which led to a color change from red to gray (Figure 4a). The LOD values for both DA and GSH were 0.46 μM and 1.2 μM, respectively, which highlights the effective role of GNRs in enhancing the sensitivity of the GNR/Ag NP hybrid [132].
Two-dimensional manganese dioxide (MnO2) nanosheets exhibit broad light absorption, a large surface area, excellent chemical stability, superior water solubility, low cost, and a straightforward synthesis [133]. Often, these 2D nanomaterials can be applied synergistically with metal nanoparticles. For example, Gao et al. proposed a novel approach to fabricate Au@MnO2 core–shell-assembled nanosheets utilizing LSPR in AuNPs. Their study demonstrated that the interaction between nanosheets and AuNPs can indeed modulate the plasmonic effect [134]. In addition, Yuan et al. developed a simple and label-free single-particle detection (SPD) method for the quantification of melamine (Mel) using MnO2-modified AuNPs (Au@MnO2 NPs) (Figure 4b). In the presence of Mel, gallic acid facilitated the degradation of the MnO2 shell, which resulted in a noticeable color change from yellow to green. The LOD achieved 16.7 nM (approximately 0.002 ppm), demonstrating satisfactory results of the proposed sensing system [135]. Zhang et al. studied a high-sensitivity plasmonic color measurement biosensor for exosome quantification using the etching of gold nanobipyramid@MnO2 nanosheet nanostructures (AuNBP@MnO2 NSs). Capturing exosomes with a capture probe activates ALP, which breaks down AAP to produce ascorbic acid (AA). The etching step of AA’s AuNBP@MnO2 NSs changed the refractive index of the AuNBPs and was accompanied by a blue shift of the longitudinal localized surface plasmon resonance peak. When etched, the color changed from brown to blue, and the LOD of the exosome was 1.35 × 102 parts/μL [116].
Molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) nanosheets are both excellent and cost-effective 2D nanostructures with LSPR effects. The MoO3−x nanosheets, which are partially oxygen-deficient due to reduction by AA, exhibit an LSPR absorption peak near 820 nm and appear blue. These doped MoO3−x nanosheets also show LSPR effects and serve as promising alternatives to AuNPs and AgNPs [136,137,138,139].
Li et al. developed a colorimetric analysis method for Cu2+ based on the pH-dependent formation of plasmonic MoO3−x nanosheets. When Cu2+ is introduced, it reacts with AA to generate hydrogen ions, which leads to the formation of abundant MoO3−x nanosheets. This process increases the free carrier concentration and results in strong LSPR absorption. The LOD for Cu2+ was 0.8 nM [138]. The study by Yu et al. represented a series of colorimetric analysis methods based on plasmonic MoO3−x nanosheets for the visual detection of substances related to atmospheric sulfate formation. Moreover, the blue-colored plasmonic MoO3−x nanosheets are oxidized by hydroxyl radicals (OH) generated via the Fenton reaction between Fe2+/Fe3+ and H2O2, resulting in colorless MoO3 nanosheets and a significant change in absorbance (Figure 4c) [140]. This section focuses on the unique optical properties of two-dimensional materials and the LSPR phenomenon based on them applied to colorimetric biosensors, suggesting that this approach is a promising strategy in terms of improving the sensor sensitivity and expanding the application range. A detailed list of colorimetric biosensors with 2D material-based nanoparticles is presented (Table 3).
Figure 4. Noble metal decorated on a 2D-nanomaterial-based colorimetric sensing system. (a) Schematic illustrating the sequential colorimetric detection of DA and GSH using a GNR/AgNP hybrid sensor. Reproduced with permission from [132]. (b) Quantification of Mel-based Au@MnO2 NPs via the SPD method. The selectively etched MnO2 shell on the AuNPs surface results in distinctive color changes from a single Au@MnO2 NP. Reproduced with permission from [135]. (c) Colorimetric assays based on MoO3−x nanosheets for the visual detection of atmospheric sulfate formation-involved substances. The blue MoO3−x nanosheets turn colorless due to the oxidation of hydroxyl radicals (·OH) in the presence of Fe2+/Fe3+ and H2O2. Reproduced with permission from [140].
Figure 4. Noble metal decorated on a 2D-nanomaterial-based colorimetric sensing system. (a) Schematic illustrating the sequential colorimetric detection of DA and GSH using a GNR/AgNP hybrid sensor. Reproduced with permission from [132]. (b) Quantification of Mel-based Au@MnO2 NPs via the SPD method. The selectively etched MnO2 shell on the AuNPs surface results in distinctive color changes from a single Au@MnO2 NP. Reproduced with permission from [135]. (c) Colorimetric assays based on MoO3−x nanosheets for the visual detection of atmospheric sulfate formation-involved substances. The blue MoO3−x nanosheets turn colorless due to the oxidation of hydroxyl radicals (·OH) in the presence of Fe2+/Fe3+ and H2O2. Reproduced with permission from [140].
Biosensors 15 00362 g004

3.2. Nanozyme-Based Colorimetric Sensing

Nanozymes are nanosized materials equipped with enzyme-mimicking features that are often integrated into colorimetric sensing due to their intrinsic properties of stability as well as ease of operation [141,142,143]. Recently, nanozymes have been receiving a massive spotlight, especially on their use in the fields of biosensing, clinical diagnosis, drug delivery, small-molecule detection, and others, thanks to their capabilities of having large surface areas, ease of preparation and storage, as well as low-cost processing [104,144,145]. Nevertheless, when compared to natural enzymes such as HRP, nanozymes struggle with limitations, especially in their practical applications. In brief, nanozymes face problems such as low specificity and comparatively low activity, and they mimic only limited types of enzymes [91,104,146]. Hence, researchers have been exerting maximum efforts to fully comprehend the synthesis of nanozymes with the primary goal [144]. In this section, based on the mechanism of colorimetric signal generation using oxidation–reduction reactions, we will discuss recent studies of colorimetric biosensors using various nanozymes and 2D nanomaterials.

3.2.1. Enzyme-Like Nanomaterial-Based Colorimetric Biosensors

In the field of analytical chemistry, enzyme-based sensor techniques are categorized as one of the standard methods [141,147,148]. Nanozyme-based colorimetric sensing methods have been considered as assuring toolkit assays with a wide spectrum of biomarker detection [149,150], wherein the changeable physicochemical properties of nanozymes, especially their activity being controllable, render them attractive materials in the analytical fields [151,152,153,154,155]. Thus, to optimize the catalytic activity of nanozymes, their structure and shape must be continuously adjusted, and elemental doping is an effective approach to improve the catalytic performance by controlling the electronic structure and geometry [156]. Platinum (Pt) is a common nanozyme and is used in colorimetric biosensing research due to its high efficiency and stability in a wide range of pH and temperature conditions [157]. Fu et al. fabricated porous Au@Pt core–shell nanoparticles based on the excellent peroxidase-like activity of Pt nanoparticles for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus [158]. In another study, Lu et al. constructed an Au-Pt bimetallic structure by growing Pt nanoparticles in a dumbbell shape on AuNR seeds using polyT20. Their system showed outstanding capabilities for both detecting and destroying Escherichia coli by utilizing the photothermal effect of AuNRs under light irradiation (Figure 5a). This study achieved a detection limit of 2 CFU/mL within 5 min [159].
Iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles are considered enzyme-like materials and have certain advantages over biosensor research, together with the fact that they are magnetic and capable of catalytic activation [160]. Since nanozymes can easily aggregate in water due to their low instability and dispersibility, the focus of a study was to modify an Fe3O4 nanozyme to maintain its properties [161]. Duan et al. produced Janus palladium (Pd)–Fe3O4 dumbbell nanoparticles and proposed a colorimetric assay to detect biothiols. As a result, the dispersion of the Janus Pd–Fe3O4 nanoparticles was very uniform and showed a higher catalytic oxidation effect when compared with the same amount of Pd and Fe3O4. This assay was also successfully applied to detect biothiols in real urine samples and showed an LOD of 3.1 nM in an aqueous solution [162]. Additionally, Nie et al. proposed a stable and sensitive smartphone color-measurement system based on cobalt-doped Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (Co-Fe3O4 MNPs) for the visual detection of norfloxacin (NOR). Compared to Fe3O4, Co-Fe3O4 MNPs obtained a more markedly peroxidase-like activity. A low concentration of NOR accelerated the color reaction of TMBs (to darken the blue color of the solution), but at high concentrations, the nanozyme activity was suppressed, and the color gradually faded (Figure 5b). Based on this, a colorimetric sensor integrated with a smartphone RGB mode was developed with a visual detection limit of 0.08 µM [163].
Another example of nanozyme-like materials is metal–organic framework nanoparticles (MOFs). MOFs are highly porous materials that feature a high surface area and porosity and are commonly used for various applications, such as gas adsorption and separation, as well as drug carriers for controlled release. Various metals and ligands can be combined to implement the desired functions with these composite hybrid catalyst MOFs, and they are often used in sensing field applications [164]. Liu et al. implemented a Zn-MOF doped with Eu3+ ions and proposed a DEM fluorescence visual sensing platform using it. This study demonstrates the expansion from fluorescence sensors to quantitative and static visualization sensing platforms by utilizing the design flexibility of MOFs [165]. In a study conducted by Shi et al., a copper-based MOF (Cu-MOF) colorimetric assay was developed for the selective identification of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris and the detection of guaiacol. The enzyme-like nanomaterials were fabricated by allowing 4,4′-bipyridine and Cu ions to self-assemble at room temperature.
Furthermore, MOFs play a role in mimicking peroxidase for the detection of A. acidoterrestris and achieve a highly selective detection of guaiacol as compared to other polyphenols with a high sensitivity of the LOD of 0.003 mM. The peroxidase-like activities of MOFs have been extensively applied for the reduction of compounds such as glucose, AA, and H2O2, yet this study is the first attempt to utilize MOFs for the detection of guaiacol and A. acidoterrestris [166]. Wang et al. conducted research on zirconium-based MOFs (Zr-MOFs), which were synthesized as peroxidase mimics to catalyze the chromogenic reaction of H2O2 and 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine for the detection and quantification of phosphorylated proteins, with α-casein (α-CS) as the target protein (Figure 5c). Specifically, the Zr nodes in the MOF provide specific sites for recognizing phosphate groups in proteins, which enables simple yet efficient quantification of α-CS with an LOD of 0.16 µg/mL and a range from 0.17 to 5.0 µg/mL [141].
From the perspective of nanomaterial-based biosensors, a DNAzyme consists of a guanine (G)-rich sequence with hemin as a monomer, enclosed in a G-quadruplex structure, which forms the foundation of the DNAzyme with robust peroxidase activity. This property has made DNAzymes a hotspot in the sensing field due to their noteworthy qualities [167]. DNAzymes are reported to be highly stable under heat treatments, resistant to hydrolysis, easy to label, and cost-effective, further promoting their incorporation into the assembly of colorimetric biosensors [168,169]. However, most DNAzyme-based sensing systems in complex biological samples rely on inhibiting enzymatic catalytic activities, which can lead to false-positive results [168]. Thus, Wang et al. carried out a study where they discovered that the incorporation of histamine can increase the catalytic activity of DNAzymes. In summary, the presence of histamine encourages G-quadruplex sequence generation, allowing for effortless bonding with hemin and fabricating many DNAzyme molecules (Figure 5d). The performance of the proposed biosensor in terms of sensitivity demonstrates a low LOD of 38 µg/L for histamine with anti-interference ability, high selectivity, and a good recovery rate in actual meats, which creates opportunities for the pre-evaluation of freshness and histamine content of real meat products [168].
Furthermore, heterostructured nanomaterial-based nanozymes, such as copper sulfide/zinc sulfide (CuS/ZnS), are constructed from a single component and function as multifaceted nanobiological sensors. Their outstanding capability and synergistic performance arise from the coordination of nanomaterials [149,170]. Tian et al. fabricated a CuS/ZnS nanozyme plasmon-stimulated colorimetry biosensor array, wherein ZnS was packaged in hollow CuS nanocubes. This enabled the regulation of the LSPR effect, along with a remarkable peroxidase-like catalytic activity for the detection of three metabolites.
The proposed biosensor system achieved an LOD as low as 1 µM for each of the target metabolites: cysteine (Cys), AA, and GSH. Each metabolite can be selectively detected both qualitatively and quantitatively using a principal component analysis within the range of 5 to 1000 µM. This biosensor system is both capable and robust, and it is hoped that it will contribute to the development of sensors in the field of clinical detection [149]. In this section, various studies on nanozyme-based colorimetric biosensors were discussed, highlighting their enzyme-mimicking activity, which enables enhanced stability, cost-effectiveness, and signal amplification, demonstrating their potential as next-generation diagnostic platforms. A detailed list of colorimetric-based biosensors with nanozymes is presented (Table 4).
Figure 5. Enzyme-like nanomaterial-based colorimetric sensing. (a) Synthesis of anisotropic dumbbell-like Au-Pt nanoparticles with a DNA-encoded seed growth method for catalytic and anti-bacterial activities for bacterial detection. The DNA sequence polyT20 is regulated to form dumbbell-like Au-Pt bimetallic structures, while the synergy between Au and Pt results in high catalytic activity. Reproduced with permission from [159]. (b) Co-Fe3O4 nanozyme-based colorimetric sensing platform for NOR detection, showing color change intensity triggered by the increment and decrement of NOR concentration. The one-step hydrothermal synthesized Co-Fe3O4 MNP eliminates the optical interference as well as displays a remarkable peroxidase-like activity. Reproduced with permission from [163]. (c) Schematic illustrating Zr-based MOF with peroxidase activity. While Zr nodes interact specifically with phosphate groups in phosphorylated proteins, the dipyridyl-based ligands catalyze the TMB and H2O2 chromogenic reactions. Reproduced with permission from [141]. (d) Fabrication of DNAzyme via the insertion of hemin into a G-quadruplex DNA sequence. DNAzyme catalyzes H2O2 by dissolving oxygen, resulting in yellow products as the TMB molecules lose two electrons. Reproduced with permission from [168].
Figure 5. Enzyme-like nanomaterial-based colorimetric sensing. (a) Synthesis of anisotropic dumbbell-like Au-Pt nanoparticles with a DNA-encoded seed growth method for catalytic and anti-bacterial activities for bacterial detection. The DNA sequence polyT20 is regulated to form dumbbell-like Au-Pt bimetallic structures, while the synergy between Au and Pt results in high catalytic activity. Reproduced with permission from [159]. (b) Co-Fe3O4 nanozyme-based colorimetric sensing platform for NOR detection, showing color change intensity triggered by the increment and decrement of NOR concentration. The one-step hydrothermal synthesized Co-Fe3O4 MNP eliminates the optical interference as well as displays a remarkable peroxidase-like activity. Reproduced with permission from [163]. (c) Schematic illustrating Zr-based MOF with peroxidase activity. While Zr nodes interact specifically with phosphate groups in phosphorylated proteins, the dipyridyl-based ligands catalyze the TMB and H2O2 chromogenic reactions. Reproduced with permission from [141]. (d) Fabrication of DNAzyme via the insertion of hemin into a G-quadruplex DNA sequence. DNAzyme catalyzes H2O2 by dissolving oxygen, resulting in yellow products as the TMB molecules lose two electrons. Reproduced with permission from [168].
Biosensors 15 00362 g005

3.2.2. Enzyme-Mimicking 2D Nanomaterial-Based Biosensors

In this section, catalytically active nanomaterials with a 2D structure are reviewed in-depth. Currently, 2D-structured nanozymes are highly valued due to their distinctive physical and chemical properties, such as a wide surface area, excellent biocompatibility, electrical conductivity, and catalytic activity, along with ease of fabrication and modification [171,172]. Due to these unique characteristics, various types of 2D nanomaterials are being explored, which advances research across various fields.
Ti3C2Tx MXene has gained significant attention due to its excellent intrinsic properties, such as metallic conductivity, superior hydrophilicity, and good stability [173]. The terminal groups of MXene contribute to the regulation of the oxidation state of Ti atoms, which facilitates the electron transfer. Wang et al. utilized oxygen-terminated few-layer titanium-based MXene nanosheets (OFL-Ti-MNs) for the detection of kanamycin (KAN). The Ti3AlC2 MAX phase material underwent chemical etching using a LiF/HCl-based method to remove the aluminum (Al) layer, which resulted in the synthesis of an oxygen-terminated multilayer MXene with various functional groups, such as –O, –OH, and –F, on its surface. In the presence of KAN, the TMB oxidation reaction is inhibited, preventing the expected color change. This analysis required less than 15 min and provided an LOD of 15.3 nM for KAN [174].
Zhou et al. constructed a platform for the high-sensitivity colorimetric detection of mercury ions by fabricating Ti3C2Tx MXene nanoribbons decorated with AuNPs (Figure 6a). The peroxidase-mimicking activity of the Ti3C2Tx MXene nanoribbons against TMB was enhanced in the presence of mercury ions, which resulted in the oxidation of TMB and the color of the solution changing from colorless to dark blue. The achieved LOD was 0.054 nM, which was significantly lower than the critical level (about 10.0 nM) of mercury ions in drinking water, as defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [175].
Moreover, progress has advanced sufficiently for the use of graphene oxide (GO) in engineering, nanocomposites, biosensors, and drug delivery. In particular, GO exhibits peroxidase-like activity and is used in colorimetric biosensors [176]. For instance, Chen et al. revealed that, due to its amphiphilicity, wide surface area, and distinct affinities for ssDNA and dsDNA, GO facilitates the in situ growing of inorganic nanozyme Pt nanoparticles (PtNPs) on its surface. The integration of DNA-controlled growth of PtNPs and target DNA-triggered triplex-hybridization chain reaction (tHCR) on GO regulates the nanozyme activity, which enables the fabrication of nanozyme-catalyzed colorimetric biosensors (Figure 6b). Accordingly, superior sensitivity for mutant KRAS DNA and let-7a microRNA as model targets was achieved with an LOD down to 14.6 pM and 21.7 pM, respectively. The proposed system displayed transferability that can be used for other nucleic acid targets and integration with different inorganic nanomaterials [177].
In addition, graphene-like nanosheets of TMDs, such as tungsten disulfide (WS2) and tungsten diselenide (WSe2), have also been reported for their intrinsic peroxidase-mimicking activity, and they are commonly integrated into colorimetric detection methods [178,179]. A study by Zhou et al. reported that the conjugation of an aptamer on layered WS2 nanosheets has been profoundly enhancing the peroxidase-mimicking activity of nanosheets. Specifically, a straightforward and stable colorimetric aptasensor for KAN recognition was fabricated with an LOD as low as 0.06 µM within a linear range of 0.1 to 0.5 µM, exhibiting great selectivity against other tested antibiotics [179]. In another recent study, 2D few-layer WSe2 nanosheets were fabricated with an aptamer to quantify ochratoxin A (OTA) (Figure 6c). Correspondingly, the adsorbed OTA aptamer on the WSe2 nanosheet induced an enhanced enzymatic catalytic property of the nanosheet, with a good linear relationship of R2 = 0.99 with 0.16 ng/mL of the LOD in the range of 0.5 to 50 ng/mL of OTA [178].
MnO2-based nanozymes offer the advantages of having good biocompatibility, low processing cost, and rapid and simple handling in catalytic reactions [105]. Yang et al. fabricated Fe3O4@MnO2 nanosheet-based colorimetric biosensors for the detection of uric acid (UA) through three different visualization methods: naked eye, UV–vis spectrophotometry, and smartphone colorimetry (Figure 6d). In short, thanks to Fe3O4 doped in between the MnO2 nanosheets, the specific surface area increased, which further cleared the space and path for electron conduction and oxidation and, thus, enhanced the catalytic activity of the MnO2 nanosheet. As a result, the LOD values for UA were 0.27 µM and 21 µM through UV–vis spectrometry and smartphone-based colorimetry, respectively, with linear ranges of 1 to 70 µM and 200 to 650 µM [151]. In light of these findings, it is evident that nanosheets coordinate the activities of nanozymes, thus allowing sensors to be fabricated using aptamer adsorption. This section reviewed studies on 2D nanomaterial-based colorimetric biosensors utilizing redox reactions, demonstrating their potential for diagnostic applications. A detailed list of colorimetric-based biosensors with 2D material-based nanozymes is presented (Table 5).
Figure 6. Enzyme-mimicking 2D nanomaterial-based colorimetric sensing. (a) Preparation of Ti3C2TxNR@AuNPs nanohybrids and the mechanism for nanozyme colorimetric detection of Hg2+ and Cys based on Ti3C2TxNR@AuNPs. Reproduced with permission from [175]. (b) Schematic illustrating a DNA-controlled approach and growth of Pt nanoparticles on GO–PtNPs for the colorimetric detection of mutant KRAS. GO supports the inorganic nanozyme formation by PtNPs in situ growth on its surface. Reproduced with permission from [177]. (c) Illustration of label-free WSe2 nanosheet synthesis for OTA detection via a colorimetric aptasensor. Reproduced with permission from [178]. (d) Biomimetic oxidase-based colorimetric determination, integrating Fe3O4@MnO2 for UA quantification. Reproduced with permission from [151].
Figure 6. Enzyme-mimicking 2D nanomaterial-based colorimetric sensing. (a) Preparation of Ti3C2TxNR@AuNPs nanohybrids and the mechanism for nanozyme colorimetric detection of Hg2+ and Cys based on Ti3C2TxNR@AuNPs. Reproduced with permission from [175]. (b) Schematic illustrating a DNA-controlled approach and growth of Pt nanoparticles on GO–PtNPs for the colorimetric detection of mutant KRAS. GO supports the inorganic nanozyme formation by PtNPs in situ growth on its surface. Reproduced with permission from [177]. (c) Illustration of label-free WSe2 nanosheet synthesis for OTA detection via a colorimetric aptasensor. Reproduced with permission from [178]. (d) Biomimetic oxidase-based colorimetric determination, integrating Fe3O4@MnO2 for UA quantification. Reproduced with permission from [151].
Biosensors 15 00362 g006

4. The Fusion of Colorimetric and Other Analytical Techniques

Colorimetric biosensors are based on sensing techniques that produce color changes through specific biochemical reactions with target analytes [180]. Unfortunately, there is a limit to observing color changes with the naked eye; therefore, more precise analytical methods are needed to accurately confirm the output signals. Several advanced techniques have been developed to address this limitation. For example, to increase the detection sensitivity by combining colorimetric signals with other signals, a device-based analysis that can quantitatively measure color changes and data analysis techniques using AI and machine learning was assembled in one platform [181,182,183]. As the analysis of colorimetric sensors using smartphones continues to be actively studied, the development of a highly portable diagnostic platform is also gaining attention in the sensing field. Specifically, the adaptation of the latest technologies, such as machine learning in colorimetric biosensors, makes it possible to analyze even a minor color change accurately, which improves the diagnostic accuracy of biosensors [32]. In this section, we would like to comprehensively discuss the application of colorimetric biosensors, especially the principles and detection techniques of the latest biosensing platform technologies.

4.1. Dual-Mode Sensing Technologies

The main advantage of colorimetric biosensors is that they enable rapid detection by visually observing color changes, thus making them highly suitable for POCT and routine monitoring [184]. However, a simple visual observation alone is insufficient for detecting low concentrations of target analytes. To overcome this limitation, approaches incorporating detection techniques such as electrochemical, Raman, and fluorescence methods have been developed [185,186,187]. For example, electrochemical methods utilize analysis techniques like potentiometry, amperometry, and impedance to detect a charge transfer at an electrode when the target interacts with it. This approach offers high sensitivity and the benefit of real-time monitoring [188]. Leveraging these benefits, Zhang et al. proposed an electrochemical–colorimetric dual-mode biosensor for the effective detection of cardiac troponin I (cTnI). The group utilized aptamer-functionalized Fe3+-polydopamine (Apt@Fe3+-PDA) nanomaterials, in which, upon binding to cTnI under acidic conditions, Fe3+ was released, which led to its conversion into Prussian Blue and the subsequent generation of both electrochemical and colorimetric signals. The LOD values achieved through colorimetric and electrochemical methods were 7.4 pg/mL and 3.2 pg/mL, respectively, which indicates ultrasensitive detection [189]. Similarly, Zhan et al. developed a dual-mode biosensor using FeOOH nanostructures modified with MXene quantum dots to effectively detect nitrite (NO2) (Figure 7a). The active site of the Fe-Ti heterodimer decomposes H2O2, generating reactive oxygen species (•OH) that react with nitrite to produce both a color output and an electrochemical signal. The LOD values for nitrite detection were 1.58 μM (colorimetric) and 2.99 μM (electrochemical), demonstrating the potential of this sensor platform for next-generation environmental monitoring applications [190].
Next, Raman spectroscopy is a technique that identifies specific substances based on their unique Raman signals. It is widely applied in various biosensor applications [191]. However, Raman signals are inherently weak, which requires the use of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) to amplify them [192]. Since SERS signals are highly sensitive to the distance between molecules and nanomaterials, integrating SERS with colorimetric biosensors can compensate for the low sensitivity of colorimetric detection. Yu et al. developed an SERS-colorimetric-based immunochromatography assay for the effective detection of the monkeypox virus (MPXV). This assay rapidly identified the target virus using colorimetric signals while enabling the detection of low-concentration targets through SERS signals (Figure 7b). The LOD values for colorimetric and SERS detection were 0.2 ng/mL and 0.002 ng/mL, respectively, exhibiting a performance that was 5 to 500 times superior to conventional immunochromatographic assays (ICA) [193]. Additionally, Sun et al. developed a SERS/colorimetric-based biosensor for detecting GSH, a biomarker for the early diagnosis of cancer and Parkinson’s disease in human blood. By using AuNPs@Cu-porphyrin MOFs, the group observed both SERS and colorimetric outputs, achieving LOD values of 5 nM and 1 μM and demonstrating ultrasensitive detection [194].
Fluorescence occurs when molecules absorb light and subsequently emit it at a different wavelength. Fluorescence-based sensing techniques enable highly sensitive and non-destructive analyses [195]. Recently, increasing research has been conducted on dual sensors that combine fluorescence with colorimetric detection. Fluorescence–colorimetric dual-mode sensors offer the benefits of rapid detection times and more sensitive detection compared to conventional sensors [196]. For instance, Wang et al. developed a dual-signal ICA combining fluorescence and colorimetric signals for monkeypox virus detection, achieving an LOD of 0.00024 pg/mL and 0.1 ng/mL, respectively, which is 10 to 400 times more sensitive than conventional ICA methods [197]. Additionally, Li et al. developed a fluorescence–colorimetric dual sensor that showed highly sensitive detection of GSH, a biomarker for diabetes and neurodegenerative diseases, with an LOD of 1.6 μM and 7 μM, respectively (Figure 7c) [198]. This section reviewed dual-mode biosensor studies combining colorimetry with SERS, electrochemical, and fluorescence techniques, highlighting their contribution to enhanced sensitivity and diagnostic reliability through multimodal analyses. A detailed list of colorimetric-based dual-mode biosensors is presented (Table 6).
Figure 7. Biosensors incorporating dual-mode detection techniques. (a) Dual-mode assay combining colorimetric and electrochemical methods for the determination of nitrite using MQDs@FeOOH nanozymes. Reproduced with permission from [190]. (b) Dual-signal enhancement LFA integrating MoS2-based colorimetric and SERS for MPXV detection. Reproduced with permission from [193]. (c) Schematic illustrating a dual-mode sensor (NSCQDs@MSN-Cu) with fluorescence and colorimetric detection of GSH. Reproduced with permission from [198].
Figure 7. Biosensors incorporating dual-mode detection techniques. (a) Dual-mode assay combining colorimetric and electrochemical methods for the determination of nitrite using MQDs@FeOOH nanozymes. Reproduced with permission from [190]. (b) Dual-signal enhancement LFA integrating MoS2-based colorimetric and SERS for MPXV detection. Reproduced with permission from [193]. (c) Schematic illustrating a dual-mode sensor (NSCQDs@MSN-Cu) with fluorescence and colorimetric detection of GSH. Reproduced with permission from [198].
Biosensors 15 00362 g007

4.2. AI and Machine Learning-Assisted Colorimetric Biosensors

Colorimetric results are difficult to interpret accurately with the naked eye because subtle color changes can be affected by environmental factors such as lighting conditions and visual variation. As a result, various methods that leverage different instruments have been studied to reliably observe color changes, recently generating significant research interest in smartphone-based colorimetric detection methods [199,200,201,202]. As an example, Choi et al. developed a fast and reliable smartphone-assisted colorimetric biosensor. This smartphone-assisted colorimetric biosensor showed high selectivity with respect to various interfering substances in human urine. The LOD for a urine solution was 0.0036 mM, while 0.58 mM was achieved for urine detected on paper, which indicates high sensitivity [106].
Moreover, Zhao et al. developed a smartphone-enabled colorimetric biosensor that quickly distinguishes between a variety of pesticides within a real sample. Glyphosate, tyram, imidacloprid, and five other pesticides yielded LOD values of 1.5 × 10−7 M—a concentration that is much lower than the one required by the conventional U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1.18 × 10−6 to 3.91 × 10−6 M). The group demonstrated a significant improvement in accuracy and detection speed by analyzing the RGB color changes in smartphones resulting from AuNPs aggregation [203].
With recent advancements in science and technology, AI and machine learning algorithms are becoming more sophisticated, introducing revolutionary changes to the field of biosensors [32,204]. Although colorimetric biosensors have the benefit of rapid target detection, they suffer from low sensitivity. Therefore, by integrating AI and machine learning into colorimetric biosensors, it becomes possible to detect subtle color changes that are difficult to distinguish for the human eye. This technology can further improve the sensitivity by differentiating not only color changes but also saturation and intensity, thereby allowing the distinction of even lower LOD values [205,206,207]. Ouyang et al. researched the effective detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using AI and colorimetric biosensors. The group developed an AI technology that mimics human olfactory functions and measures color changes, which enabled the detection of VOCs at sub-ppm levels through direct visualization and monitoring [208]. Similarly, Tong et al. combined colorimetric lateral flow assays (LFAs) with AI to detect COVID-19 disease-neutralizing antibodies. The AI analysis algorithm evaluated the color changes in the control and test lines formed through antigen–antibody reactions (Figure 8a). Consequently, this method provided faster and more accurate results compared to conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) LFA kits and allowed for the detection of extremely low concentrations of target antibodies (with an LOD of 160 ng/mL) [209].
Machine learning has been actively utilized to improve the performance of colorimetric-based biosensors [210]. Mann et al. developed a colorimetric DNAzyme cross-linked hydrogel sensor to detect Escherichia coli and paired it with an AI model to eliminate ambiguity in sensor readings (Figure 8b). In real-life lake water samples, E. coli was detected at a concentration of 101 CFU/mL, which suggests the potential for broad applications for the detection of other bacteria. The researchers trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) AI model with optical images, further automating and enhancing the usability of this platform. With this machine learning platform, they detected urinary tract infections (UTI) in real patient urine samples (that were automatically readable) with more than 96% accuracy [211]. Subsequently, Hassani-Marand et al. proposed a machine learning platform for detecting catecholamine neurotransmitters (CNs), such as dopamine (DA), epinephrine (EP), norepinephrine (NEP), and levodopa (LD), in human urine. These are associated with Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease. The different aggregation behaviors of AuNPs generated unique fingerprint response patterns, which were input to the platform to classify samples automatically. The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) algorithm was used to distinguish between the different neurotransmitters, while partial least squares regression (PLSR) was employed for the quantitative concentration analysis [212]. Therefore, by integrating these chemical color change principles with nanotechnology, AI, and smartphone-based analytical systems, colorimetric biosensors can be further developed into more precise and user-friendly diagnostic systems, opening the path for a new paradigm in diagnostics [213]. A detailed list of instrument-assisted colorimetric biosensors is presented (Table 7).
Figure 8. AI and machine learning integration in colorimetric biosensors. (a) AI-assisted colorimetric PDA-LFIA platform for the sensitive and accurate quantification of neutralizing antibodies from vaccinations. Reproduced with permission from [209]. (b) Schematic diagram showing the potential use of a CNN detection platform for UTI detection at home. Reproduced with permission from [211].
Figure 8. AI and machine learning integration in colorimetric biosensors. (a) AI-assisted colorimetric PDA-LFIA platform for the sensitive and accurate quantification of neutralizing antibodies from vaccinations. Reproduced with permission from [209]. (b) Schematic diagram showing the potential use of a CNN detection platform for UTI detection at home. Reproduced with permission from [211].
Biosensors 15 00362 g008

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

This review discussed the fundamental principles, recent advances, and practical applications of colorimetric biosensors based on nanomaterials. These biosensors offer notable advantages, such as simplicity in visual detection, low cost, rapid analysis, portability, and suitability for POCT, making them attractive tools in diverse fields, including disease diagnostics, environmental monitoring, and food safety testing.
The integration of various nanomaterials such as noble metal nanoparticles and 2D materials like graphene, WS2, MnO2, and nanozymes has significantly improved the sensitivity, selectivity, and reliability of colorimetric biosensors. Particularly, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have been extensively used due to their tunable optical properties, while nanozymes and 2D nanomaterials contribute to signal amplification through enhanced catalytic activities. Furthermore, with the aid of smart devices, machine learning, and AI-driven data processing, the limitations of traditional colorimetric detection, such as poor quantifiability and subjectivity, are being effectively addressed, promoting the development of portable and intelligent sensor systems.
Additionally, technological advances have led to the integration of smartphones and artificial intelligence in colorimetric analyses. RGB-based signal interpretation using smartphone cameras, combined with machine learning algorithms, allows for automated, quantitative analyses with reduced user variability. These smart systems can process multiple signal patterns, enabling real-time monitoring and accurate decision-making, thus enhancing the commercial viability of portable colorimetric biosensors.
However, despite these technological advances, the clinical translation of nanomaterial-based colorimetric biosensors remains challenging. Most studies are still confined to laboratory-scale optimization and do not fully account for the complexity of real biological environments. Issues such as reduced reproducibility in clinical samples, limited long-term stability, and potential biological interference from the nanomaterials themselves persist. Standardized clinical validation protocols tailored to nanomaterial-based biosensors are still lacking, with most studies limited to in vitro or animal model testing [33,34,35,36,37]. Moreover, large-scale synthesis is hindered by their inherent instability and sensitivity to environmental conditions, resulting in increased production costs and difficulties in standardization [39,40]. Also, a lack of active collaboration between material scientists and clinical practitioners further contributes to a gap between sensor design and real-world medical needs [38].
To overcome these barriers, it is essential to establish a full-chain collaborative model integrating basic research, sensor development, and clinical evaluation. The active involvement of clinicians from the early stages of sensor design to the final stages of validation will be crucial in translating these promising technologies into practical clinical tools. Future efforts should prioritize resolving real-world implementation issues, thereby promoting the successful adoption of nanomaterial-based colorimetric biosensors in clinical practice.

Author Contributions

J.-H.C. and Y.L. organized the structure of the manuscript. Y.L., I.H. and S.B.S. wrote the whole manuscript. J.-H.C., Y.L., I.H. and S.B.S. revised the manuscript. All authors collaboratively wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National NanoFab Center (NNFC) grant, funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. RS-2024-00440049), by the Bio&Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF), funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. RS-2023-00236157), and by grants from the Bio-Medical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Singh, A.K.; Mittal, S.; Das, M.; Saharia, A.; Tiwari, M. Optical Biosensors: A Decade in Review. Alex. Eng. J. 2023, 67, 673–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mohankumar, P.; Ajayan, J.; Mohanraj, T.; Yasodharan, R. Recent Developments in Biosensors for Healthcare and Biomedical Applications: A Review. Measurement 2021, 167, 108293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chadha, U.; Bhardwaj, P.; Agarwal, R.; Rawat, P.; Agarwal, R.; Gupta, I.; Panjwani, M.; Singh, S.; Ahuja, C.; Selvaraj, S.K.; et al. Recent Progress and Growth in Biosensors Technology: A Critical Review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2022, 109, 21–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lei, Z.; Guo, B. 2D Material-Based Optical Biosensor: Status and Prospect. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2102924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, F.; Tang, Q.; Ma, T.; Zhu, B.; Wang, L.; He, C.; Luo, X.; Cao, S.; Ma, L.; Cheng, C. Structures, Properties, and Challenges of Emerging 2D Materials in Bioelectronics and Biosensors. InfoMat 2022, 4, e12299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nguyen, Q.H.; Kim, M. Il Nanomaterial-Mediated Paper-Based Biosensors for Colorimetric Pathogen Detection. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 132, 116038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhu, W.; Li, L.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, X.; Hao, N.; Guo, Y.; Wang, K. A Colorimetric Biosensor for Simultaneous Ochratoxin A and Aflatoxins B1 Detection in Agricultural Products. Food Chem. 2020, 319, 126544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, G.; Zu, B.; Dou, X. One-Step Instantaneous Detection of Multiple Military and Improvised Explosives Facilitated by Colorimetric Reagent Design. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 13980–13988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, X.; Mei, X.; Yang, J.; Li, Y. Hydrogel-Involved Colorimetric Platforms Based on Layered Double Oxide Nanozymes for Point-of-Care Detection of Liver-Related Biomarkers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 6985–6993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yokobori, S.; Shimazaki, J.; Kaneko, H.; Asai, H.; Kanda, J.; Takauji, S.; Sato, E.; Ichibayashi, R.; Fujita, M.; Shiraishi, S.; et al. The Feasibility of Point-of-Care Testing for Initial Urinary Liver Fatty Acid-Binding Protein to Estimate Severity in Severe Heatstroke. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 5255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, T.; Zeng, Q.; Ji, F.; Wu, H.; Ledesma-Amaro, R.; Wei, Q.; Yang, H.; Xia, X.; Ren, Y.; Mu, K.; et al. Precise In-Field Molecular Diagnostics of Crop Diseases by Smartphone-Based Mutation-Resolved Pathogenic RNA Analysis. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rhode, S.; Rogge, L.; Marthoenis, M.; Seuring, T.; Zufry, H.; Bärnighausen, T.; Sofyan, H.; Manne-Goehler, J.; Vollmer, S. Real-World Smartphone-Based Point-of-Care Diagnostics in Primary Health Care to Monitor HbA1c Levels in People with Diabetes. Commun. Med. 2025, 5, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ma, L.; Abugalyon, Y.; Li, X. Multicolorimetric ELISA Biosensors on a Paper/Polymer Hybrid Analytical Device for Visual Point-of-Care Detection of Infection Diseases. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2021, 413, 4655–4663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fontes, C.M.; Lipes, B.D.; Liu, J.; Agans, K.N.; Yan, A.; Shi, P.; Cruz, D.F.; Kelly, G.; Luginbuhl, K.M.; Joh, D.Y.; et al. Ultrasensitive Point-of-Care Immunoassay for Secreted Glycoprotein Detects Ebola Infection Earlier than PCR. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021, 13, 9696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Alafeef, M.; Moitra, P.; Dighe, K.; Pan, D. RNA-Extraction-Free Nano-Amplified Colorimetric Test for Point-of-Care Clinical Diagnosis of COVID-19. Nat. Protoc. 2021, 16, 3141–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kermanshahian, K.; Yadegar, A.; Ghourchian, H. Gold Nanorods Etching as a Powerful Signaling Process for Plasmonic Multicolorimetric Chemo-/Biosensors: Strategies and Applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 442, 213934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chang, Q.; Wu, J.; Zhang, R.; Wang, S.; Zhu, X.; Xiang, H.; Wan, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Jin, M.; Li, X.; et al. Optimizing Single-Atom Cerium Nanozyme Activity to Function in a Sequential Catalytic System for Colorimetric Biosensing. Nano Today 2024, 56, 102236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, T.; Deng, R.; Wang, Y.; Wu, C.; Zhang, K.; Wang, C.; Gong, N.; Ledesma-Amaro, R.; Teng, X.; Yang, C.; et al. A Paper-Based Assay for the Colorimetric Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Variants at Single-Nucleotide Resolution. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2022, 6, 957–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Min, J.; Chin, L.K.; Oh, J.; Landeros, C.; Vinegoni, C.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.J.; Park, J.Y.; Liu, A.-Q.; Castro, C.M.; et al. CytoPAN—Portable Cellular Analyses for Rapid Point-of-Care Cancer Diagnosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12, 9746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Luo, M.; Xue, X.; Rao, H.; Wang, H.; Liu, X.; Zhou, X.; Xue, Z.; Lu, X. Simply Converting Color Signal Readout into Thermal Signal Readout for Breaking the Color Resolution Limitation of Colorimetric Sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 309, 127707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, P.; Zhao, M.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, M.; Li, X.; Wang, M.; Liu, B.; Pan, J.; Niu, X. Dual-Mode Fluorescence and Colorimetric Detection of Pesticides Realized by Integrating Stimulus-Responsive Luminescence with Oxidase-Mimetic Activity into Cerium-Based Coordination Polymer Nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 423, 127077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, M.; Zhao, M.; Liu, P.; Zhu, H.; Liu, B.; Hu, P.; Niu, X. Coupling Diazotization with Oxidase-Mimetic Catalysis to Realize Dual-Mode Double-Ratiometric Colorimetric and Electrochemical Sensing of Nitrite. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 355, 131308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, Y.; Gu, Y.; Liu, X.; Deng, T.; Dai, S.; Qu, J.; Yang, G.; Qu, L. Reusable Ring-like Fe3O4/Au Nanozymes with Enhanced Peroxidase-like Activities for Colorimetric-SERS Dual-Mode Sensing of Biomolecules in Human Blood. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 209, 114253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, Y.; Huang, X.; Hu, X.; Tong, W.; Leng, Y.; Xiong, Y. Recent Advances in Colorimetry/Fluorimetry-Based Dual-Modal Sensing Technologies. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 190, 113386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ninwong, B.; Ratnarathorn, N.; Henry, C.S.; Mace, C.R.; Dungchai, W. Dual Sample Preconcentration for Simultaneous Quantification of Metal Ions Using Electrochemical and Colorimetric Assays. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 3999–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shen, Y.; Gao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Ye, Y.; Wu, Y. Polydopamine-Based Nanozyme with Dual-Recognition Strategy-Driven Fluorescence-Colorimetric Dual-Mode Platform for Listeria Monocytogenes Detection. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 439, 129582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wei, S.; Su, Z.; Bu, X.; Shi, X.; Pang, B.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Zhao, C. On-Site Colorimetric Detection of Salmonella Typhimurium. npj Sci. Food 2022, 6, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ghosh, S.; Aggarwal, K.; Vinitha, T.U.; Nguyen, T.; Han, J.; Ahn, C.H. A New Microchannel Capillary Flow Assay (MCFA) Platform with Lyophilized Chemiluminescence Reagents for a Smartphone-Based POCT Detecting Malaria. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2020, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lewińska, I.; Speichert, M.; Granica, M.; Tymecki, Ł. Colorimetric Point-of-Care Paper-Based Sensors for Urinary Creatinine with Smartphone Readout. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 340, 129915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cui, R.; Tang, H.; Huang, Q.; Ye, T.; Chen, J.; Huang, Y.; Hou, C.; Wang, S.; Ramadan, S.; Li, B.; et al. AI-Assisted Smartphone-Based Colorimetric Biosensor for Visualized, Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024, 259, 116369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Verma, D.; Singh, K.R.; Yadav, A.K.; Nayak, V.; Singh, J.; Solanki, P.R.; Singh, R.P. Internet of Things (IoT) in Nano-Integrated Wearable Biosensor Devices for Healthcare Applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. X 2022, 11, 100153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cui, F.; Yue, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, H.S. Advancing Biosensors with Machine Learning. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 3346–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xie, Y.; Li, K.; Liu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, C.; Yu, Y.; Wang, J.; Su, L.; Zhang, X. A Smart Lab on a Wearable Microneedle Patch with Convolutional Neural Network-enhanced Colorimetry for Early Warning of Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone Secretion. Aggregate 2025, 6, e671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhu, D.D.; Zheng, L.W.; Duong, P.K.; Cheah, R.H.; Liu, X.Y.; Wong, J.R.; Wang, W.J.; Tien Guan, S.T.; Zheng, X.T.; Chen, P. Colorimetric Microneedle Patches for Multiplexed Transdermal Detection of Metabolites. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 212, 114412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; Chen, G.; Wen, D.; Chan, A.; Gu, Z. Transdermal Colorimetric Patch for Hyperglycemia Sensing in Diabetic Mice. Biomaterials 2020, 237, 119782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lino, C.; Barrias, S.; Chaves, R.; Adega, F.; Martins-Lopes, P.; Fernandes, J.R. Biosensors as Diagnostic Tools in Clinical Applications. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Rev. Cancer 2022, 1877, 188726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Haick, H.; Tang, N. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Sensors for Clinical Decisions. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 3557–3567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tian, H.; Huang, G.; Xie, F.; Fu, W.; Yang, X. THz Biosensing Applications for Clinical Laboratories: Bottlenecks and Strategies. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 163, 117057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mahmud, M.M.; Pandey, N.; Winkles, J.A.; Woodworth, G.F.; Kim, A.J. Toward the Scale-up Production of Polymeric Nanotherapeutics for Cancer Clinical Trials. Nano Today 2024, 56, 102314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fruncillo, S.; Su, X.; Liu, H.; Wong, L.S. Lithographic Processes for the Scalable Fabrication of Micro- and Nanostructures for Biochips and Biosensors. ACS Sens. 2021, 6, 2002–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kuiri, P.K. Tailoring Localized Surface Plasmons in Ag–Al Alloys’ Nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 826, 154250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liang, A.; Liu, Q.; Wen, G.; Jiang, Z. The Surface-Plasmon-Resonance Effect of Nanogold/Silver and Its Analytical Applications. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 37, 32–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Minopoli, A.; Sakač, N.; Lenyk, B.; Campanile, R.; Mayer, D.; Offenhäusser, A.; Velotta, R.; Della Ventura, B. LSPR-Based Colorimetric Immunosensor for Rapid and Sensitive 17β-Estradiol Detection in Tap Water. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 308, 127699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Biswas, A.; Lee, S.; Cencillo-Abad, P.; Karmakar, M.; Patel, J.; Soudi, M.; Chanda, D. Nanoplasmonic Aptasensor for Sensitive, Selective, and Real-Time Detection of Dopamine from Unprocessed Whole Blood. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, 7460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, X.; Xu, D.; Jaquet, B.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Huang, H.; Chen, Y.; Gerhard, C.; Zhang, K. Structural Colors by Synergistic Birefringence and Surface Plasmon Resonance. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 16832–16839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sepúlveda, B.; Angelomé, P.C.; Lechuga, L.M.; Liz-Marzán, L.M. LSPR-Based Nanobiosensors. Nano Today 2009, 4, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ding, S.; Barr, J.A.; Lyu, Z.; Zhang, F.; Wang, M.; Tieu, P.; Li, X.; Engelhard, M.H.; Feng, Z.; Beckman, S.P.; et al. Effect of Phosphorus Modulation in Iron Single-Atom Catalysts for Peroxidase Mimicking. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2209633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Keyvani, F.; GhavamiNejad, P.; Saleh, M.A.; Soltani, M.; Zhao, Y.; Sadeghzadeh, S.; Shakeri, A.; Chelle, P.; Zheng, H.; Rahman, F.A.; et al. Integrated Electrochemical Aptamer Biosensing and Colorimetric PH Monitoring via Hydrogel Microneedle Assays for Assessing Antibiotic Treatment. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2309027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Hu, H.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, X.; Wu, P. Selective Heavy Atom Effect-Promoted Photosensitization Colorimetric Detection of Ag+ in Silver Ore Samples. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 6501–6506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mayer, K.M.; Hafner, J.H. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3828–3857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, W.; You, Y.; Gunasekaran, S. LSPR-based Colorimetric Biosensing for Food Quality and Safety. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 5829–5855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Reinhard, I.; Miller, K.; Diepenheim, G.; Cantrell, K.; Hall, W.P. Nanoparticle Design Rules for Colorimetric Plasmonic Sensors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 4342–4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guo, Y.; Wu, J.; Li, J.; Ju, H. A Plasmonic Colorimetric Strategy for Biosensing through Enzyme Guided Growth of Silver Nanoparticles on Gold Nanostars. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 78, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhao, J.; Liu, G.; Lu, Y.; Guan, Y.; Liu, Y. An Ultra-Sensitive Colorimetric Detection of Ag Ions Based on Etching AuNP@MnO2 Nanoparticles with Glutathione by Using Dark Field Optical Microscopy. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 330, 129382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Su, Y.-C.; Lin, A.-Y.; Hu, C.-C.; Chiu, T.-C. Functionalized Silver Nanoparticles as Colorimetric Probes for Sensing Tricyclazole. Food Chem. 2021, 347, 129044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. He, Y.; Tian, F.; Zhou, J.; Zhao, Q.; Fu, R.; Jiao, B. Colorimetric Aptasensor for Ochratoxin A Detection Based on Enzyme-Induced Gold Nanoparticle Aggregation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 388, 121758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wu, Y.-Y.; Huang, P.; Wu, F.-Y. A Label-Free Colorimetric Aptasensor Based on Controllable Aggregation of AuNPs for the Detection of Multiplex Antibiotics. Food Chem. 2020, 304, 125377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jo, S.; Lee, W.; Park, J.; Kim, W.; Kim, W.; Lee, G.; Lee, H.-J.; Hong, J.; Park, J. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Aptasensor for the Highly Sensitive Direct Detection of Cortisol in Human Saliva. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 304, 127424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hong, Y.; Huh, Y.-M.; Yoon, D.S.; Yang, J. Nanobiosensors Based on Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance for Biomarker Detection. J. Nanomater. 2012, 2012, 759830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jeon, J.; Uthaman, S.; Lee, J.; Hwang, H.; Kim, G.; Yoo, P.J.; Hammock, B.D.; Kim, C.S.; Park, Y.S.; Park, I.K. In-Direct Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR)-Based Nanosensors for Highly Sensitive and Rapid Detection of Cortisol. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 266, 710–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cottat, M.; Thioune, N.; Gabudean, A.M.; Lidgi-Guigui, N.; Focsan, M.; Astilean, S.; Lamy de la Chapelle, M. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR) Biosensor for the Protein Detection. Plasmonics 2013, 8, 699–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Meira, D.I.; Barbosa, A.I.; Borges, J.; Reis, R.L.; Correlo, V.M.; Vaz, F. Label-Free Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR) Biosensor, Based on Au-Ag NPs Embedded in TiO2 Matrix, for Detection of Ochratoxin-A (OTA) in Wine. Talanta 2025, 284, 127238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ghodselahi, T.; Neishaboorynejad, T.; Arsalani, S. Fabrication LSPR Sensor Chip of Ag NPs and Their Biosensor Application Based on Interparticle Coupling. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 343, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lim, W.Q.; Gao, Z. Plasmonic Nanoparticles in Biomedicine. Nano Today 2016, 11, 168–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cortie, M.B.; McDonagh, A.M. Synthesis and Optical Properties of Hybrid and Alloy Plasmonic Nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3713–3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sui, M.; Kunwar, S.; Pandey, P.; Lee, J. Strongly Confined Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR) Bands of Pt, AgPt, AgAuPt Nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Gao, C.; Hu, Y.; Wang, M.; Chi, M.; Yin, Y. Fully Alloyed Ag/Au Nanospheres: Combining the Plasmonic Property of Ag with the Stability of Au. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7474–7479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, S.; Miao, P.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhang, B.; Du, Y.; Han, X.; Sun, J.; Xu, P. Recent Advances in Plasmonic Nanostructures for Enhanced Photocatalysis and Electrocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2000086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zheng, J.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, H.; Bai, X.; Ai, R.; Shao, L.; Wang, J. Gold Nanorods: The Most Versatile Plasmonic Nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 13342–13453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, J. Construction of Plasmonic Nano-Biosensor-Based Devices for Point-of-Care Testing. Small Methods 2017, 1, 1700197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chow, T.H.; Li, N.; Bai, X.; Zhuo, X.; Shao, L.; Wang, J. Gold Nanobipyramids: An Emerging and Versatile Type of Plasmonic Nanoparticles. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 2136–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Palani, S.; Kenison, J.P.; Sabuncu, S.; Huang, T.; Civitci, F.; Esener, S.; Nan, X. Multispectral Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (MsLSPR) Reveals and Overcomes Spectral and Sensing Heterogeneities of Single Gold Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 2266–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Liebtrau, M.; Sivis, M.; Feist, A.; Lourenço-Martins, H.; Pazos-Pérez, N.; Alvarez-Puebla, R.A.; de Abajo, F.J.G.; Polman, A.; Ropers, C. Spontaneous and Stimulated Electron–Photon Interactions in Nanoscale Plasmonic near Fields. Light. Sci. Appl. 2021, 10, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Illath, K.; Shinde, A.; Paremmal, P.; Gupta, P.; Nagai, M.; Santra, T.S. Surface Plasmon Resonance Tunable Gold Nanostar Synthesis in a Symmetric Flow-Focusing Droplet Device. Surf. Interfaces 2023, 36, 102478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Butet, J.; Martin, O.J.F. Refractive Index Sensing with Fano Resonant Plasmonic Nanostructures: A Symmetry Based Nonlinear Approach. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 15262–15270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Smith, J.D.; Woessner, Z.J.; Skrabalak, S.E. Branched Plasmonic Nanoparticles with High Symmetry. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 18113–18123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cobley, C.M.; Skrabalak, S.E.; Campbell, D.J.; Xia, Y. Shape-Controlled Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles for Plasmonic and Sensing Applications. Plasmonics 2009, 4, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Atta, S.; Zhao, Y.; Sanchez, S.; Seedial, D.; Devadhasan, J.P.; Summers, A.J.; Gates-Hollingsworth, M.A.; Pflughoeft, K.J.; Gu, J.; Montgomery, D.C.; et al. Plasmonic-Enhanced Colorimetric Lateral Flow Immunoassays Using Bimetallic Silver-Coated Gold Nanostars. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 54907–54918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Takahata, R.; Yamazoe, S.; Koyasu, K.; Imura, K.; Tsukuda, T. Gold Ultrathin Nanorods with Controlled Aspect Ratios and Surface Modifications: Formation Mechanism and Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 6640–6647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Toh, Y.-R.; Yu, P.; Wen, X.; Tang, J.; Hsieh, T. Induced PH-Dependent Shift by Local Surface Plasmon Resonance in Functionalized Gold Nanorods. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Li, M.; Ding, C.; Zhang, D.; Chen, W.; Yan, Z.; Chen, Z.; Guo, Z.; Guo, L.; Huang, Y. Distinguishable Colorimetric Biosensor for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2303159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Panferov, V.G.; Liu, J. Optical and Catalytic Properties of Nanozymes for Colorimetric Biosensors: Advantages, Limitations, and Perspectives. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2024, 12, 2401318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lin, L.; Luo, Y.; Chen, Q.; Lai, Q.; Zheng, Q. Redox-modulated Colorimetric Detection of Ascorbic Acid and Alkaline Phosphatase Activity with Gold Nanoparticles. Luminescence 2020, 35, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Lin, Z.; Yuan, J.; Niu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, M.; Cai, Y.; Bian, Z.; Yang, S.; Liu, A. Oxidase Mimicking Nanozyme: Classification, Catalytic Mechanisms and Sensing Applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 520, 216166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Shen, X.; Wang, Z.; Gao, X.J.; Gao, X. Reaction Mechanisms and Kinetics of Nanozymes: Insights from Theory and Computation. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2211151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Xu, Z. Plasmonic Colorimetric Biosensor for Visual Detection of Telomerase Activity Based on Horseradish Peroxidase-Encapsulated Liposomes and Etching of Au Nanobipyramids. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 296, 126646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Behrouzifar, F.; Shahidi, S.-A.; Chekin, F.; Hosseini, S.; Ghorbani-HasanSaraei, A. Colorimetric Assay Based on Horseradish Peroxidase/Reduced Graphene Oxide Hybrid for Sensitive Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide in Beverages. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 257, 119761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Neptuno Rodríguez-López, J.; Lowe, D.J.; Hernández-Ruiz, J.; Hiner, A.N.P.; García-Cánovas, F.; Thorneley, R.N.F. Mechanism of Reaction of Hydrogen Peroxide with Horseradish Peroxidase: Identification of Intermediates in the Catalytic Cycle. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11838–11847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chen, J.; Ma, Q.; Li, M.; Chao, D.; Huang, L.; Wu, W.; Fang, Y.; Dong, S. Glucose-Oxidase like Catalytic Mechanism of Noble Metal Nanozymes. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Liu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Li, M.; Qin, S.; Zhao, Z.; Lin, B.; Ding, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Li, C. Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) and Glucose Oxidase (GOX) Based Dual-Enzyme System: Sustainable Release of H2O2 and Its Effect on the Desirable Ping Pong Bibi Degradation Mechanism. Env. Res. 2023, 229, 115979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Liang, M.; Yan, X. Nanozymes: From New Concepts, Mechanisms, and Standards to Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 2190–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Iyer, P.V.; Ananthanarayan, L. Enzyme Stability and Stabilization—Aqueous and Non-Aqueous Environment. Process Biochem. 2008, 43, 1019–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yu, T.; Xu, H.; Zhao, Y.; Han, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, C.; Wang, W.; Guo, Q.; Ge, J. Aptamer Based High Throughput Colorimetric Biosensor for Detection of Staphylococcus Aureus. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ornelas-González, A.; Rito-Palomares, M.; González-González, M. TMB vs ABTS: Comparison of Multi-Enzyme-Based Approaches for the Colorimetric Quantification of Salivary Glucose. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2022, 97, 2720–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gu, S.; Risse, S.; Lu, Y.; Ballauff, M. Mechanism of the Oxidation of 3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine Catalyzed by Peroxidase-Like Pt Nanoparticles Immobilized in Spherical Polyelectrolyte Brushes: A Kinetic Study. ChemPhysChem 2020, 21, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ma, X.; Lin, Y.; Guo, L.; Qiu, B.; Chen, G.; Yang, H.; Lin, Z. A Universal Multicolor Immunosensor for Semiquantitative Visual Detection of Biomarkers with the Naked Eyes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 87, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Feng, C.; Liang, W.; Liu, F.; Xiong, Y.; Chen, M.; Feng, P.; Guo, M.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, L. A Simple and Highly Sensitive Naked-Eye Analysis of EGFR 19del via CRISPR/Cas12a Triggered No-Nonspecific Nucleic Acid Amplification. ACS Synth. Biol. 2022, 11, 867–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zeng, R.; Wang, J.; Wang, Q.; Tang, D.; Lin, Y. Horseradish Peroxidase-Encapsulated DNA Nanoflowers: An Innovative Signal-Generation Tag for Colorimetric Biosensor. Talanta 2021, 221, 121600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Deshmukh, A.R.; Aloui, H.; Kim, B.S. Novel Biogenic Gold Nanoparticles Catalyzing Multienzyme Cascade Reaction: Glucose Oxidase and Peroxidase Mimicking Activity. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 421, 127859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Bai, Y.; Li, H.; Xu, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Weng, J.; Li, Z.; Sun, L. Ultrasensitive Colorimetric Biosensor for BRCA1 Mutation Based on Multiple Signal Amplification Strategy. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 166, 112424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wu, J.; Liang, L.; Li, S.; Qin, Y.; Zhao, S.; Ye, F. Rational Design of Nanozyme with Integrated Sample Pretreatment for Colorimetric Biosensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024, 257, 116310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Wang, Y.; Cho, A.; Jia, G.; Cui, X.; Shin, J.; Nam, I.; Noh, K.; Park, B.J.; Huang, R.; Han, J.W. Tuning Local Coordination Environments of Manganese Single-Atom Nanozymes with Multi-Enzyme Properties for Selective Colorimetric Biosensing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202300119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Yang, L.; Xu, X.; Song, Y.; Huang, J.; Xu, H. Research Progress of Nanozymes in Colorimetric Biosensing: Classification, Activity and Application. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 487, 150612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yang, W.; Yang, X.; Zhu, L.; Chu, H.; Li, X.; Xu, W. Nanozymes: Activity Origin, Catalytic Mechanism, and Biological Application. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 448, 214170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wang, M.; Liu, H.; Fan, K. Signal Amplification Strategy Design in Nanozyme-Based Biosensors for Highly Sensitive Detection of Trace Biomarkers. Small Methods 2023, 7, 2301049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Choi, C.-K.; Shaban, S.M.; Moon, B.-S.; Pyun, D.-G.; Kim, D.-H. Smartphone-Assisted Point-of-Care Colorimetric Biosensor for the Detection of Urea via PH-Mediated AgNPs Growth. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1170, 338630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jang, W.; Yoo, H.; Shin, D.; Noh, S.; Kim, J.Y. Colorimetric Identification of Colorless Acid Vapors Using a Metal-Organic Framework-Based Sensor. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Wang, Y.; Xianyu, Y. Colorimetric Sensing Strategy through the Coordination Chemistry between Ascorbic Acid 2-Phosphate and Copper Ions. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 7202–7211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Miao, X.; Zhu, Z.; Jia, H.; Lu, C.; Liu, X.; Mao, D.; Chen, G. Colorimetric Detection of Cancer Biomarker Based on Enzyme Enrichment and PH Sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 320, 128435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ki, J.; Na, H.-K.; Yoon, S.W.; Le, V.P.; Lee, T.G.; Lim, E.-K. CRISPR/Cas-Assisted Colorimetric Biosensor for Point-of-Use Testing for African Swine Fever Virus. ACS Sens. 2022, 7, 3940–3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Szobi, A.; Buranovská, K.; Vojtaššáková, N.; Lovíšek, D.; Özbaşak, H.Ö.; Szeibeczederová, S.; Kapustian, L.; Hudáčová, Z.; Kováčová, V.; Drobná, D.; et al. Vivid COVID-19 LAMP Is an Ultrasensitive, Quadruplexed Test Using LNA-Modified Primers and a Zinc Ion and 5-Br-PAPS Colorimetric Detection System. Commun. Biol. 2023, 6, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Hong, J.; Lee, B.; Park, C.; Kim, Y. A Colorimetric Detection of Polystyrene Nanoplastics with Gold Nanoparticles in the Aqueous Phase. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 850, 158058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Li, J.; Duan, Y.; Wang, L.; Ma, J. Preparation of Core-Shell Structure Ag@TiO2 Plasma Photocatalysts and Reduction of Cr(VI): Size Dependent and LSPR Effect. Env. Res. 2024, 248, 118265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Zhang, J.; Chai, F.; Li, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, S.; Li, F.; Liang, A.; Luo, A.; Wang, D.; Jiang, X. Weakly Ionized Gold Nanoparticles Amplify Immunoassays for Ultrasensitive Point-of-Care Sensors. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eadn5698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ménard-Moyon, C.; Bianco, A.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K. Two-Dimensional Material-Based Biosensors for Virus Detection. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 3739–3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhang, Y.; Jiao, J.; Wei, Y.; Wang, D.; Yang, C.; Xu, Z. Plasmonic Colorimetric Biosensor for Sensitive Exosome Detection via Enzyme-Induced Etching of Gold Nanobipyramid@MnO2 Nanosheet Nanostructures. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 15244–15252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Hasan, M.R.; Sharma, P.; Pilloton, R.; Khanuja, M.; Narang, J. Colorimetric Biosensor for the Naked-Eye Detection of Ovarian Cancer Biomarker PDGF Using Citrate Modified Gold Nanoparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron. X 2022, 11, 100142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Li, J.; Khan, S.; Gu, J.; Filipe, C.D.M.; Didar, T.F.; Li, Y. A Simple Colorimetric Au-on-Au Tip Sensor with a New Functional Nucleic Acid Probe for Food-borne Pathogen Salmonella typhimurium. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202300828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Montaño-Priede, J.L.; Sanromán-Iglesias, M.; Zabala, N.; Grzelczak, M.; Aizpurua, J. Robust Rules for Optimal Colorimetric Sensing Based on Gold Nanoparticle Aggregation. ACS Sens. 2023, 8, 1827–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Li, P.; Lee, S.M.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, S.; Park, S.; Park, K.S.; Park, H.G. Colorimetric Detection of Individual Biothiols by Tailor Made Reactions with Silver Nanoprisms. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhang, F.; Huang, P.-J.J.; Liu, J. Sensing Adenosine and ATP by Aptamers and Gold Nanoparticles: Opposite Trends of Color Change from Domination of Target Adsorption Instead of Aptamer Binding. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 2885–2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Li, Z.; Wang, Z.; Khan, J.; LaGasse, M.K.; Suslick, K.S. Ultrasensitive Monitoring of Museum Airborne Pollutants Using a Silver Nanoparticle Sensor Array. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 2783–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Jiang, S.; Cui, C.; Bai, W.; Wang, W.; Ren, E.; Xiao, H.; Zhou, M.; Cheng, C.; Guo, R. Shape-Controlled Silver Nanoplates Colored Fabric with Tunable Colors, Photothermal Antibacterial and Colorimetric Detection of Hydrogen Sulfide. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2022, 626, 1051–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Cunningham, B.; Engstrom, A.M.; Harper, B.J.; Harper, S.L.; Mackiewicz, M.R. Silver Nanoparticles Stable to Oxidation and Silver Ion Release Show Size-Dependent Toxicity In Vivo. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Qiu, Z.; Xue, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, X.; Wen, C.; Gong, H.; Zeng, J. Highly Sensitive Colorimetric Detection of NH3 Based on Au@Ag@AgCl Core-Shell Nanoparticles. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 2807–2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhang, G.; Hu, H.; Deng, S.; Xiao, X.; Xiong, Y.; Peng, J.; Lai, W. An Integrated Colorimetric and Photothermal Lateral Flow Immunoassay Based on Bimetallic Ag–Au Urchin-like Hollow Structures for the Sensitive Detection of E. coli O157:H7. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 225, 115090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Su, H.; Li, X.; Huang, L.; Cao, J.; Zhang, M.; Vedarethinam, V.; Di, W.; Hu, Z.; Qian, K. Plasmonic Alloys Reveal a Distinct Metabolic Phenotype of Early Gastric Cancer. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2007978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Alex, A.V.; Deosarkar, T.; Chandrasekaran, N.; Mukherjee, A. An Ultra-Sensitive and Selective AChE Based Colorimetric Detection of Malathion Using Silver Nanoparticle-Graphene Oxide (Ag-GO) Nanocomposite. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1142, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Huang, C.-C.; Chen, H.-J.; Leong, Q.L.; Lai, W.K.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Chen, J.-C.; Huang, C.-L. Synthesis of Silver Nanoplates with a Narrow LSPR Band for Chemical Sensing through a Plasmon-Mediated Process Using Photochemical Seeds. Materialia 2022, 21, 101279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Deepa, C.; Rajeshkumar, L.; Ramesh, M. Preparation, Synthesis, Properties and Characterization of Graphene-Based 2D Nano-Materials for Biosensors and Bioelectronics. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 19, 2657–2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. El barghouti, M.; Akjouj, A.; Mir, A. Effect of Graphene Layer on the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR) and the Sensitivity in Periodic Nanostructure. Photonics Nanostruct 2018, 31, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Rostami, S.; Mehdinia, A.; Niroumand, R.; Jabbari, A. Enhanced LSPR Performance of Graphene Nanoribbons-Silver Nanoparticles Hybrid as a Colorimetric Sensor for Sequential Detection of Dopamine and Glutathione. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1120, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Tian, F.; Fu, R.; Zhou, J.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Jiao, B.; He, Y. Manganese Dioxide Nanosheet-Mediated Etching of Gold Nanorods for a Multicolor Colorimetric Assay of Total Antioxidant Capacity. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 321, 128604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Gao, M.; Song, Y.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, W.; Peng, J.; Shi, L.; Jia, R.; Muhammad, Y.; Huang, L. Controlled Fabrication of Au@MnO2 Core/Shell Assembled Nanosheets by Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 537, 147912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yuan, X.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, X.; Mao, G.; Wei, L. Single Particle Detection Based Colorimetric Melamine Assay with MnO2-Modified Gold Nanoparticles. Microchem. J. 2023, 184, 108133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wu, H.; Li, X.; Cheng, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Li, R.; Wu, Q.; Lin, H.; Xu, J.; Wang, G.; Lin, C.; et al. Plasmon-Driven N2 Photofixation in Pure Water over MoO3−x Nanosheets under Visible to NIR Excitation. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2020, 8, 2827–2835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Zeng, Q.; Ruan, L.; Che, X.; Shu, X.; Jin, J.; Lv, Z.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, W. Synthesis of MoO3−x Nanosheets and Its Application in Ascorbic Acid Detection of Fruit and Vegetables. J. Food Sci. 2023, 88, 837–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Li, M.; Huang, X.; Yu, H. A Colorimetric Assay for Ultrasensitive Detection of Copper (II) Ions Based on PH-Dependent Formation of Heavily Doped Molybdenum Oxide Nanosheets. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 101, 614–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ahmadzadeh, Z.; Ranjbar, M. Plasmonic MoO3−x Nanosheets by Anodic Oxidation of Molybdenum for Colorimetric Sensing of Hydrogen Peroxide. Anal. Chim. Acta 2022, 1198, 339529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Yu, H.; Dong, F.; Li, B. Highly Sensitive Colorimetric Detection of Atmospheric Sulfate Formation-Involved Substances Using Plasmonic Molybdenum Trioxide Nanosheets. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 320, 128368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wang, L.; Hu, Z.; Wu, S.; Pan, J.; Xu, X.; Niu, X. A Peroxidase-Mimicking Zr-Based MOF Colorimetric Sensing Array to Quantify and Discriminate Phosphorylated Proteins. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1121, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Niu, X.; He, Y.; Li, X.; Zhao, H.; Pan, J.; Qiu, F.; Lan, M. A Peroxidase-Mimicking Nanosensor with Hg2+-Triggered Enzymatic Activity of Cysteine-Decorated Ferromagnetic Particles for Ultrasensitive Hg2+ Detection in Environmental and Biological Fluids. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 281, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Fan, K.; Xi, J.; Fan, L.; Wang, P.; Zhu, C.; Tang, Y.; Xu, X.; Liang, M.; Jiang, B.; Yan, X.; et al. In Vivo Guiding Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanozyme for Tumor Catalytic Therapy. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Peng, Z.; Xiong, Y.; Liao, Z.; Zeng, M.; Zhong, J.; Tang, X.; Qiu, P. Rapid Colorimetric Detection of H2O2 in Living Cells and Its Upstream Series of Molecules Based on Oxidase-like Activity of CoMnO3 Nanofibers. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 382, 133540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Naveen Prasad, S.; Bansal, V.; Ramanathan, R. Detection of Pesticides Using Nanozymes: Trends, Challenges and Outlook. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2021, 144, 116429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Rao, H.; Xue, X.; Luo, M.; Liu, H.; Xue, Z. Recent Advances in the Development of Colorimetric Analysis and Testing Based on Aggregation-Induced Nanozymes. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Miranda, O.R.; Chen, H.T.; You, C.C.; Mortenson, D.E.; Yang, X.C.; Bunz, U.H.F.; Rotello, V.M. Enzyme-Amplified Array Sensing of Proteins in Solution and in Biofluids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5285–5289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Curey, T.E.; Goodey, A.; Tsao, A.; Lavigne, J.; Sohn, Y.; McDevitt, J.T.; Anslyn, E.V.; Neikirk, D.; Shear, J.B. Characterization of Multicomponent Monosaccharide Solutions Using an Enzyme-Based Sensor Array. Anal. Biochem. 2001, 293, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Tian, L.; Cao, M.; Cheng, H.; Wang, Y.; He, C.; Shi, X.; Li, T.; Li, Z. Plasmon-Stimulated Colorimetry Biosensor Array for the Identification of Multiple Metabolites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 6849–6858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Wang, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, X.; Sun, H.; Su, X. Fluorescence Sensing Strategy for Xanthine Assay Based on Gold Nanoclusters and Nanozyme. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 358, 131488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Yang, W.; Fei, J.; Xu, W.; Jiang, H.; Sakran, M.; Hong, J.; Zhu, W.; Zhou, X. A Biosensor Based on the Biomimetic Oxidase Fe3O4@MnO2 for Colorimetric Determination of Uric Acid. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2022, 212, 112347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Song, C.; Ding, W.; Zhao, W.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Yao, Y.; Yao, C. High Peroxidase-like Activity Realized by Facile Synthesis of FeS2 Nanoparticles for Sensitive Colorimetric Detection of H2O2 and Glutathione. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 151, 111983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Zhang, R.; Lu, N.; Zhang, J.; Yan, R.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, N.; Lv, M.; Zhang, M. Ultrasensitive Aptamer-Based Protein Assays Based on One-Dimensional Core-Shell Nanozymes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 150, 111881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Chen, Z.; Liu, X.; Huang, C.; Li, J.; Shen, X. Artificial Cytochrome c Mimics: Graphene Oxide–Fe(III) Complex-Coated Molecularly Imprinted Colloidosomes for Selective Photoreduction of Highly Toxic Pollutants. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 6615–6626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Wang, C.; Ren, G.; Yuan, B.; Zhang, W.; Lu, M.; Liu, J.; Li, K.; Lin, Y. Enhancing Enzyme-like Activities of Prussian Blue Analog Nanocages by Molybdenum Doping: Toward Cytoprotecting and Online Optical Hydrogen Sulfide Monitoring. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 7822–7830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wang, M.; Jiang, M.; Luo, X.; Zhang, L.; He, Y.; Xue, F.; Su, X. High-Performance Colorimetric Sensor Based on PtRu Bimetallic Nanozyme for Xanthine Analysis. Food Chem. X 2024, 23, 101588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Pedone, D.; Moglianetti, M.; Lettieri, M.; Marrazza, G.; Pompa, P.P. Platinum Nanozyme-Enabled Colorimetric Determination of Total Antioxidant Level in Saliva. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 8660–8664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Fu, Z.; Zeng, W.; Cai, S.; Li, H.; Ding, J.; Wang, C.; Chen, Y.; Han, N.; Yang, R. Porous Au@Pt Nanoparticles with Superior Peroxidase-like Activity for Colorimetric Detection of Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2021, 604, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Lu, C.; Tang, L.; Gao, F.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Zheng, J. DNA-Encoded Bimetallic Au-Pt Dumbbell Nanozyme for High-Performance Detection and Eradication of Escherichia Coli O157:H7. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 187, 113327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Yang, W.; Weng, C.; Li, X.; He, H.; Fei, J.; Xu, W.; Yan, X.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, X. A Sensitive Colorimetric Sensor Based on One-Pot Preparation of h-Fe3O4@ppy with High Peroxidase-like Activity for Determination of Glutathione and H2O2. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 338, 129844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Ju, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Huang, C.; Li, Y.; Kong, D.; Shen, W.; Tang, S. Modification and Application of Fe3O4 Nanozymes in Analytical Chemistry: A Review. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2023, 34, 107820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Duan, W.; Qiu, Z.; Cao, S.; Guo, Q.; Huang, J.; Xing, J.; Lu, X.; Zeng, J. Pd–Fe3O4 Janus Nanozyme with Rational Design for Ultrasensitive Colorimetric Detection of Biothiols. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 196, 113724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Nie, L.; Li, S.; Gao, X.; Yuan, S.; Dong, G.; Tang, G.; Song, D.; Bu, L.; Zhou, Q. Sensitive Visual Detection of Norfloxacin in Water by Smartphone Assisted Colorimetric Method Based on Peroxidase-like Active Cobalt-Doped Fe3O4 Nanozyme. J. Environ. Sci. 2025, 148, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Ouyang, Y.; O’Hagan, M.P.; Willner, I. Functional Catalytic Nanoparticles (Nanozymes) for Sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 218, 114768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Liu, W.; Huang, Y.; Ji, C.; Grimes, C.A.; Liang, Z.; Hu, H.; Kang, Q.; Yan, H.; Cai, Q.-Y.; Zhou, Y.-G. Eu3+-Doped Anionic Zinc-Based Organic Framework Ratio Fluorescence Sensing Platform: Supersensitive Visual Identification of Prescription Drugs. ACS Sens. 2024, 9, 759–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Shi, Y.; Sun, Y.; Yue, T.; Yuan, Y. Facile Fabrication of Metal-organic Frameworks with Peroxidase-like Activity for the Colorimetric Detection of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris. Food Front. 2023, 4, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Tang, Y.; Huang, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, C.; Tao, H.; Wu, Y. G-Quadruplex DNAzyme as Peroxidase Mimetic in a Colorimetric Biosensor for Ultrasensitive and Selective Detection of Trace Tetracyclines in Foods. Food Chem. 2022, 366, 130560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Wang, J.; Tang, Y.; Zheng, J.; Xie, Z.; Zhou, J.; Wu, Y. DNAzyme-Based and Smartphone-Assisted Colorimetric Biosensor for Ultrasensitive and Highly Selective Detection of Histamine in Meats. Food Chem. 2024, 435, 137526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Cao, Y.; Ding, P.; Yang, L.; Li, W.; Luo, Y.; Wang, J.; Pei, R. Investigation and Improvement of Catalytic Activity of G-Quadruplex/Hemin DNAzymes Using Designed Terminal G-Tetrads with Deoxyadenosine Caps. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 6896–6906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Dang, Y.; Wang, G.; Su, G.; Lu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, T.; Pu, X.; Wang, X.; Wu, C.; Song, C.; et al. Rational Construction of a Ni/CoMoO4 Heterostructure with Strong Ni–O–Co Bonds for Improving Multifunctional Nanozyme Activity. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 4536–4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Vinita; Nirala, N.R.; Prakash, R. Facile and Selective Colorimetric Assay of Choline Based on AuNPs-WS2QDs as a Peroxidase Mimic. Microchem. J. 2021, 167, 106312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Choi, J.-H.; Haizan, I.; Choi, J.-W. Recent Advances in Two-Dimensional Materials for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Discov. Nano 2024, 19, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Cheng, Y.; Shen, P.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Chu, K.; Guo, Y. Synergistically Enhanced Peroxidase-like Activity of Fe3O4/Ti3C2 MXene Quantum Dots and Its Application in Colorimetric Determination of Cr (VI). Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 376, 132979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Wang, W.; Yin, Y.; Gunasekaran, S. Oxygen-Terminated Few-Layered Ti3C2Tx MXene Nanosheets as Peroxidase-Mimic Nanozyme for Colorimetric Detection of Kanamycin. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 218, 114774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Zhou, X.; Zhang, J.; Liao, D.; Wu, K.; Liu, H.; Zhu, G.; Yi, Y. Self-Reduce Gold Nanoparticles on Ti3C2Tx MXene Nanoribbons to Highly Sensitive Colorimetric Determination of Mercury Ion and Cysteine Based on the Mercury-Motivated Peroxidase Mimetic Activity. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 379, 133271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Qu, F.; Li, T.; Yang, M. Colorimetric Platform for Visual Detection of Cancer Biomarker Based on Intrinsic Peroxidase Activity of Graphene Oxide. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 3927–3931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Chen, W.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Chen, L.; Wang, N.; Yu, S.; Li, G.; Xiong, L.; Ju, H. Colorimetric Detection of Nucleic Acids through Triplex-Hybridization Chain Reaction and DNA-Controlled Growth of Platinum Nanoparticles on Graphene Oxide. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 2714–2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Zhou, J.; Liu, Y.; Lv, X.; Jia, J.; Du, X.; He, J.; Xie, F.; Din, Z.; Cai, J. Aptamers Adsorbed on WSe2 Nanosheets in a Label-Free Colorimetric Aptasensor for Ochratoxin A. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 4835–4842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Tang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, P.; Wang, C.; Tao, H.; Wu, Y. Colorimetric Detection of Kanamycin Residue in Foods Based on the Aptamer-Enhanced Peroxidase-Mimicking Activity of Layered WS 2 Nanosheets. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 2884–2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Celik, C.; Kalin, G.; Cetinkaya, Z.; Ildiz, N.; Ocsoy, I. Recent Advances in Colorimetric Tests for the Detection of Infectious Diseases and Antimicrobial Resistance. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Fan, Y.J.; Wang, Z.G.; Su, M.; Liu, X.T.; Shen, S.G.; Dong, J.X. A Dual-Signal Fluorescent Colorimetric Tetracyclines Sensor Based on Multicolor Carbon Dots as Probes and Smartphone-Assisted Visual Assay. Anal. Chim. Acta 2023, 1247, 340843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Hu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Mei, X.; Liu, J.; Yao, Z.; Li, Y. Dual-Mode Sensing Platform for Electrochemiluminescence and Colorimetry Detection Based on a Closed Bipolar Electrode. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 12367–12373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Song, C.; Li, J.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, J.; Dong, C.; Wang, L. Colorimetric/SERS Dual-Mode Detection of Mercury Ion via SERS-Active Peroxidase-like Au@AgPt NPs. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 310, 127849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Xu, W.; He, Y.; Li, J.; Deng, Y.; Xu, E.; Feng, J.; Ding, T.; Liu, D.; Wang, W. Non-Destructive Determination of Beef Freshness Based on Colorimetric Sensor Array and Multivariate Analysis. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 369, 132282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Mei, X.; Yang, J.; Liu, J.; Li, Y. Wearable, Nanofiber-Based Microfluidic Systems with Integrated Electrochemical and Colorimetric Sensing Arrays for Multiplex Sweat Analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 454, 140248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Zhuang, X.; Hu, Y.; Wang, J.; Hu, J.; Wang, Q.; Yu, X. A Colorimetric and SERS Dual-Readout Sensor for Sensitive Detection of Tyrosinase Activity Based on 4-Mercaptophenyl Boronic Acid Modified AuNPs. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1188, 339172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Bai, C.-B.; Zhang, J.; Qiao, R.; Zhang, Q.-Y.; Mei, M.-Y.; Chen, M.-Y.; Wei, B.; Wang, C.; Qu, C.-Q. Reversible and Selective Turn-on Fluorescent and Naked-Eye Colorimetric Sensor to Detect Cyanide in Tap Water, Food Samples, and Living Systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 8125–8135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Son, M.H.; Park, S.W.; Sagong, H.Y.; Jung, Y.K. Recent Advances in Electrochemical and Optical Biosensors for Cancer Biomarker Detection. Biochip J. 2023, 17, 44–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Zhang, G.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Y.; Lin, B.; Wang, Y.; Guo, M.; Cao, Y. Dual-Mode of Electrochemical-Colorimetric Imprinted Sensing Strategy Based on Self-Sacrifice Beacon for Diversified Determination of Cardiac Troponin I in Serum. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 167, 112502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Zhan, X.; Ding, Z.; Shang, S.; Chu, K.; Guo, Y. MXene Quantum Dot-Modified Flower-Like FeOOH for Dual-Mode Nitrite Sensing. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 24914–24924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Sim, S.B.; Haizan, I.; Choi, M.Y.; Lee, Y.; Choi, J.-H. Recent Strategies for MicroRNA Detection: A Comprehensive Review of SERS-Based Nanobiosensors. Chemosensors 2024, 12, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Haiyang, L.; Guantong, L.; Nan, Z.; Zhanye, Y.; Xinge, J.; Bing, Z.; Tian, Y. Ag-Carbon Dots with Peroxidase-like Activity for Colorimetric and SERS Dual Mode Detection of Glucose and Glutathione. Talanta 2024, 273, 125898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Yu, Q.; Li, J.; Zheng, S.; Xia, X.; Xu, C.; Wang, C.; Wang, C.; Gu, B. Molybdenum Disulfide-Loaded Multilayer AuNPs with Colorimetric-SERS Dual-Signal Enhancement Activities for Flexible Immunochromatographic Diagnosis of Monkeypox Virus. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 459, 132136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Sun, K.; Liu, C.; Cao, Y.; Zhu, J.; Li, J.; Huang, Q. Colorimetric and SERS Dual-Mode Detection of GSH in Human Serum Based on AuNPs@Cu-Porphyrin MOF Nanozyme. Anal. Chim. Acta 2024, 1304, 342552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Yan, Z.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y. Fluorescent Sensor Arrays for Metal Ions Detection: A Review. Measurement 2022, 187, 110355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Junaid, H.M.; Waseem, M.T.; Khan, Z.A.; Gul, H.; Yu, C.; Shaikh, A.J.; Shahzad, S.A. Fluorescent and Colorimetric Sensors for Selective Detection of TNT and TNP Explosives in Aqueous Medium through Fluorescence Emission Enhancement Mechanism. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2022, 428, 113865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Wang, C.; Yu, Q.; Li, J.; Zheng, S.; Wang, S.; Gu, B. Colorimetric–Fluorescent Dual-Signal Enhancement Immunochromatographic Assay Based on Molybdenum Disulfide-Supported Quantum Dot Nanosheets for the Point-of-Care Testing of Monkeypox Virus. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 472, 144889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Li, J.; Cao, C.; Li, H.; Chen, S.; Gong, X.; Wang, S. Highly Sensitive Quantitative Detection of Glutathione Based on a Fluorescence-Colorimetric Dual Signal Recognition Strategy. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 409, 135597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Wu, S.; Khan, M.A.; Huang, T.; Liu, X.; Kang, R.; Zhao, H.; Cao, H.; Ye, D. Smartphone-Assisted Colorimetric Sensor Arrays Based on Nanozymes for High Throughput Identification of Heavy Metal Ions in Salmon. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 480, 135887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Monisha; Shrivas, K.; Kant, T.; Patel, S.; Devi, R.; Dahariya, N.S.; Pervez, S.; Deb, M.K.; Rai, M.K.; Rai, J. Inkjet-Printed Paper-Based Colorimetric Sensor Coupled with Smartphone for Determination of Mercury (Hg2+). J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 414, 125440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Balbach, S.; Jiang, N.; Moreddu, R.; Dong, X.; Kurz, W.; Wang, C.; Dong, J.; Yin, Y.; Butt, H.; Brischwein, M.; et al. Smartphone-Based Colorimetric Detection System for Portable Health Tracking. Anal. Methods 2021, 13, 4361–4369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Mastnak, T.; Mohr, G.J.; Finšgar, M. The Use of a Novel Smartphone Testing Platform for the Development of Colorimetric Sensor Receptors for Food Spoilage. Anal. Methods 2023, 15, 1700–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Zhao, T.; Liang, X.; Guo, X.; Yang, X.; Guo, J.; Zhou, X.; Huang, X.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; et al. Smartphone-Based Colorimetric Sensor Array Using Gold Nanoparticles for Rapid Distinguishment of Multiple Pesticides in Real Samples. Food Chem. 2023, 404, 134768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Zhou, Z.; Xu, T.; Zhang, X. Empowerment of AI Algorithms in Biochemical Sensors. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2024, 173, 117613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Schackart, K.E.; Yoon, J.-Y. Machine Learning Enhances the Performance of Bioreceptor-Free Biosensors. Sensors 2021, 21, 5519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Yang, J.; Li, G.; Chen, S.; Su, X.; Xu, D.; Zhai, Y.; Liu, Y.; Hu, G.; Guo, C.; Yang, H.B.; et al. Machine Learning-Assistant Colorimetric Sensor Arrays for Intelligent and Rapid Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection. ACS Sens. 2024, 9, 1945–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Wang, Z.; Dong, Y.; Sui, X.; Shao, X.; Li, K.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, D. An Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Microfluidic Colorimetric Wearable Sensor System for Monitoring of Key Tear Biomarkers. NPJ Flex. Electron. 2024, 8, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Ouyang, Q.; Rong, Y.; Xia, G.; Chen, Q.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Z. Integrating Humidity-Resistant and Colorimetric COF-on-MOF Sensors with Artificial Intelligence Assisted Data Analysis for Visualization of Volatile Organic Compounds Sensing. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, 2411621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Tong, H.; Cao, C.; You, M.; Han, S.; Liu, Z.; Xiao, Y.; He, W.; Liu, C.; Peng, P.; Xue, Z.; et al. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colorimetric Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Sensitive and Quantitative Detection of COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibody. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 213, 114449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Lu, Z.; Chen, M.; Liu, T.; Wu, C.; Sun, M.; Su, G.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Yin, H.; Zhou, X.; et al. Machine Learning System To Monitor Hg2+ and Sulfide Using a Polychromatic Fluorescence-Colorimetric Paper Sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 9800–9812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Mann, H.; Khan, S.; Prasad, A.; Bayat, F.; Gu, J.; Jackson, K.; Li, Y.; Hosseinidoust, Z.; Didar, T.F.; Filipe, C.D.M. Bacteriophage-Activated DNAzyme Hydrogels Combined with Machine Learning Enable Point-of-Use Colorimetric Detection of Escherichia Coli. Adv. Mater. 2024, 37, 2411173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Hassani-Marand, M.; Fahimi-Kashani, N.; Hormozi-Nezhad, M.R. Machine-Learning Assisted Multiplex Detection of Catecholamine Neurotransmitters with a Colorimetric Sensor Array. Anal. Methods 2023, 15, 1123–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Arya, S.S.; Dias, S.B.; Jelinek, H.F.; Hadjileontiadis, L.J.; Pappa, A.M. The Convergence of Traditional and Digital Biomarkers through AI-Assisted Biosensing: A New Era in Translational Diagnostics? Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 235, 115387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 3. Noble metal-based colorimetric biosensors. (a) Schematic illustrating the Au@Ag@AgCl NP synthesis used for the colorimetric detection of NH3, wherein the Au core regulates the colorimetric sensor’s performance, while the Ag shell improves the stability of the nanoparticles entirely. Reproduced with permission from [125]. (b) Synthesis and characterization of bimetallic Ag–Au urchin-like hollow nanospheres (BUHNPs) by co-reduction and galvanic replacement for the detection of pathogenic bacteria via colorimetric LFIA. The BUHNP-CM-LFIA exhibits excellent colorimetric performance due to the distinctive hollow structure of the bimetallic nanocores and the heterogenous branched structure of BUHNP. Reproduced with permission from [126].
Figure 3. Noble metal-based colorimetric biosensors. (a) Schematic illustrating the Au@Ag@AgCl NP synthesis used for the colorimetric detection of NH3, wherein the Au core regulates the colorimetric sensor’s performance, while the Ag shell improves the stability of the nanoparticles entirely. Reproduced with permission from [125]. (b) Synthesis and characterization of bimetallic Ag–Au urchin-like hollow nanospheres (BUHNPs) by co-reduction and galvanic replacement for the detection of pathogenic bacteria via colorimetric LFIA. The BUHNP-CM-LFIA exhibits excellent colorimetric performance due to the distinctive hollow structure of the bimetallic nanocores and the heterogenous branched structure of BUHNP. Reproduced with permission from [126].
Biosensors 15 00362 g003
Table 1. Principles of colorimetric-based biosensors with their main influencing factors.
Table 1. Principles of colorimetric-based biosensors with their main influencing factors.
PrinciplesKey Influencing Factors
LSPR-based
  • Peak shift upon target binding
  • Color change via redox reaction
1.
Noble metal (Au and Ag)
2.
Size and shape
3.
Aggregation
4.
Local environment (binding events, pH)
Redox-based
  • Color change via redox reaction
1.
Enzyme activity
2.
Colorimetric substrate
3.
Redox mediator presence (nanozymes)
4.
Analyte concentration
Table 2. List of colorimetric-based biosensors with noble metal-based nanoparticles.
Table 2. List of colorimetric-based biosensors with noble metal-based nanoparticles.
PrincipleStrategyTargetProbeLODMechanismReference
LSPRNoble metal-based nanoparticlesSalmonella typhimuriumAu3.2 × 103 CFU/mLLSPR effect by Au aggregation[118]
biothiolAgNPR0.041 µMLSPR effect by AgNPR aggregation[120]
NH3Au@Ag@AgCl core–shell nanoparticles6.4 µMLSPR effect by noble metal-core exposure[125]
Escherichia coli O157:H7BUHNPs2.48 × 103 CFU/mLLSPR effect by changes in size and shape[126]
Table 3. List of colorimetric-based biosensors with 2D material-based nanoparticles.
Table 3. List of colorimetric-based biosensors with 2D material-based nanoparticles.
PrincipleStrategyTargetProbeLODMechanismReference
LSPR2D materials-based
nanoparticles
DA
GSH
GNR/AgNP0.46 μM
1.2 μM
LSPR effect by changes in AgNPs[132]
MelAu@MnO2 NPs16.7 nMLSPR effect by local environment[135]
ExosomesAuNBP@MnO2 NSs1.35 × 102 particles/μLLSPR effect by local environment[116]
Cu2+MoO3−x nanosheet0.8 nMLSPR effect by local environment[138]
H2O2
Fe2+
Fe3+
HSO3
SO2
MoO3−x nanosheet60 nM
50 nM
400 nM
1 μM
50 ppb
LSPR effect by local environment[140]
Table 4. List of redox-based colorimetric biosensors with nanozymes.
Table 4. List of redox-based colorimetric biosensors with nanozymes.
PrincipleStrategyTargetProbeLODMechanismReference
RedoxNanozymesSARS-CoV-2Au@Pt core–shell NPs11 ng/mLEnzyme activity of Au@Pt NPs[158]
Escherichia coli O157:H7Au@Pt dumbbell NPs2 CFU/mLEnzyme activity of Au and Pt[159]
biothiolJanus Pd–Fe3O4 dumbbell NPs3.1 nMEnzyme activity of Janus Pd-Fe3O4[162]
NORCo-Fe3O4 MNP0.08 µMEnzyme activity of Co-Fe3O4 MNP[163]
Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestrisCu-MOF0.003 mMEnzyme activity of Cu-MOF[166]
α-CSZr-MOF0.16 µg/mLEnzyme activity of Zr-MOF[141]
histamineDNAzyme38 µg/LEnzyme activity of DNAzyme[168]
Cys
AA
GSH
CuS/ZnS1 µM (each)Enzyme activity of CuS/ZnS[149]
Table 5. List of redox-based colorimetric biosensors with 2D material-based nanozymes.
Table 5. List of redox-based colorimetric biosensors with 2D material-based nanozymes.
PrincipleStrategyTargetProbeLODMechanismReference
Redox2D materials-based nanozymesKANOFL-Ti-MN15.3 nMChanges in substrate concentrations[174]
Hg2+Ti3C2TxNR@AuNPs nanohybrids0.054 nMChanges in substrate concentrations[175]
KRAS DNA
let-7a
GO-PtNP14.6 pM
21.7 pM
Enzyme activity of GO-PtNP[177]
KANaptamer-
enhanced WS2
nanosheets
0.06 µMPresence of redox mediator[179]
OTAaptamer-
enhanced WSe2 nanosheets
0.16 ng/mLPresence of redox mediator[178]
UAFe3O4@MnO2 nanosheets0.27 µMEnzyme activity of Fe3O4@MnO2[151]
Table 6. List of colorimetric-based dual-mode biosensors.
Table 6. List of colorimetric-based dual-mode biosensors.
Dual ModeTargetProbeLODReference
Colorimetric–electrochemicalcTnIApt@Fe3+-PDA7.4 pg/mL (colorimetric)
3.2 pg/mL (electrochemical)
[189]
NO2MQDs@FeOOH1.58 μM (colorimetric)
2.99 μM (electrochemical)
[190]
Colorimetric–SERSMPXVMoS2@Au–Au0.2 ng/mL (colorimetric)
0.002 ng/mL (SERS)
[193]
GSHAuNPs@Cu-porphyrin MOF1 μM (colorimetric)
5 nM (SERS)
[194]
Colorimetric–fluorescenceMPXVMoS2-TQD0.1 ng/mL (colorimetric)
0.00024 pg/mL (fluorescence)
[197]
GSHCQDs@MSN-Cu7 μM (colorimetric)
1.6 μM (fluorescence)
[198]
Table 7. List of instrument-assisted colorimetric biosensors.
Table 7. List of instrument-assisted colorimetric biosensors.
Sensing
Platform
TargetProbeLODReference
Smartphone-assistedUreaAgNPs0.58 mM[106]
Glyphosate
Thiram
Imidacloprid
Tribenuron methyl
Nicosulfuron
Thifensulfuron methyl
Dichlorprop
Fenoprop
AuNPs1.5 × 10−7 M (each)[203]
AI-assistedVOCsDye@ZIF-8@COF<1 ppm[208]
COVID-19
neutralizing antibodies
PDA@polymer3@SiO2@PEG-RBD160 ng/mL[209]
Escherichia coliDNAzyme101 CFU/mL[211]
DA
EP
NEP
LD
AuNPs0.3 μM
0.5 μM
0.2 μM
1.9 μM
[212]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, Y.; Haizan, I.; Sim, S.B.; Choi, J.-H. Colorimetric Biosensors: Advancements in Nanomaterials and Cutting-Edge Detection Strategies. Biosensors 2025, 15, 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15060362

AMA Style

Lee Y, Haizan I, Sim SB, Choi J-H. Colorimetric Biosensors: Advancements in Nanomaterials and Cutting-Edge Detection Strategies. Biosensors. 2025; 15(6):362. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15060362

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Yubeen, Izzati Haizan, Sang Baek Sim, and Jin-Ha Choi. 2025. "Colorimetric Biosensors: Advancements in Nanomaterials and Cutting-Edge Detection Strategies" Biosensors 15, no. 6: 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15060362

APA Style

Lee, Y., Haizan, I., Sim, S. B., & Choi, J.-H. (2025). Colorimetric Biosensors: Advancements in Nanomaterials and Cutting-Edge Detection Strategies. Biosensors, 15(6), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15060362

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop