Next Article in Journal
Features of Chaperone Induction by 9-Aminoacridine and Acridine Orange
Next Article in Special Issue
Polymer-Mediated Signal Amplification Mechanisms for Bioelectronic Detection: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Machine Learning-Based Toothbrushing Region Recognition Using Smart Toothbrush Holder and Wearable Sensors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Single-Molecule Detection Technologies: Advances in Devices, Transduction Mechanisms, and Functional Materials for Real-World Biomedical and Environmental Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Smart Nucleic Acid Hydrogel-Based Biosensors: From Molecular Recognition and Responsive Mechanisms to Applications

1
Food Laboratory of Zhongyuan, Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2
College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
3
College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biosensors 2025, 15(12), 799; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15120799
Submission received: 20 October 2025 / Revised: 20 November 2025 / Accepted: 2 December 2025 / Published: 5 December 2025

Abstract

Smart nucleic acid hydrogels (SNAHs), endowed with stimulus responsiveness, function as programmable molecular switches that can perceive diverse external stimuli and undergo rapid, reversible, and highly specific conformational or performance changes. These dynamic properties have enabled the rational design of biosensors with bionic behaviors, facilitating cascaded “recognition–decision–execution” processes that support advanced biological analysis. Consequently, SNAHs are recognized as a core breakthrough for the next generation of intelligent biosensing units. However, a systematic mapping between SNAH design strategies, specific stimuli, and application fields remains lacking. This review mainly analyzes advances in SNAH-based biosensors over the past five years, proposing flexible and feasible design strategies and key trends in customization. Firstly, we systematically summarize molecular recognition modules involved in the construction of SNAHs, including aptamers, DNAzymes, antibodies, and specific binding peptides. Subsequently, we elaborate on the responses of these modules to external stimuli, so as to further facilitate the signal transduction of signals derived from physical, chemical, and biological sources involving temperature, light, magnetic fields, pH, nucleic acids, proteins, other biomolecules, and pathogens. Additionally, the review outlines the research progress of SNAHs in environmental monitoring, food safety, and medical diagnostics. Finally, we provide an integrated perspective on future opportunities and challenges, highlighting the innovative framework for designing SNAH-based biosensors and offering a practical roadmap for next-generation intelligent sensing applications.

1. Introduction

Smart biomaterials capable of precise molecular recognition and stimuli-responsive regulation are revolutionizing the frontiers of biosensing and diagnostics [1]. Although conventional analytical techniques such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) are well-established, they predominantly depend on complex, non-portable instrumentation and centralized laboratory settings, limiting their applicability for rapid, on-site detection [2,3,4]. Addressing this gap, smart nucleic acid hydrogels (SNAHs) emerge as a distinctive class of materials, characterized by their unique ability to integrate the smart regulatory properties of nucleic acids with the structural versatility and biocompatibility of hydrogel matrices [5]. Unlike conventional hydrogel-based biosensors, which often function as a passive matrix by physically incorporating functional components, SNAHs transcend this role. Crucially, their programmability, rooted in complementary base pairing, allows SNAHs to serve a dual function: serving not only as highly specific recognition elements but also as dynamic three-dimensional network scaffolds with certain mechanical strength [6,7]. This synergy endows SNAHs with precise recognition capability, remarkable structural tunability, reversible sol–gel transition behavior, and efficient signal amplification capabilities [8]. This built-in multifunctionality eliminates the need for bulky peripherals and makes SNAHs uniquely attractive [9,10]. Herein, SNAHs are ideal platforms for developing the next generation of smart biosensors.
The functional core of SNAH-based biosensors is built upon two pillars: specific molecular recognition and efficient signal transduction. To this end, diverse recognition modules, such as aptamers [11], DNAzymes [12], antibodies, peptides [13], and molecular imprinted polymers (MIPs) [14] have been incorporated into SNAHs, thus enabling the specific capture of a broad range of targets from small molecules to pathogens. Moreover, SNAHs are characterized by their versatile responsive mechanisms. They can be engineered to respond to a wide array of external stimuli, including physical (e.g., temperature, light), chemical (e.g., pH, ions), and biological triggers (e.g., nucleic acids, proteins) [15,16]. Importantly, such responsiveness is customizable and controllable, enabling SNAHs to operate as logic-gate systems or multiplexed sensors capable of processing several inputs simultaneously. This responsiveness directly translates molecular binding events into macroscopic, detectable signals, forming the cornerstone of their sensing applications.
Biosensors are increasingly considered for portable on-site detection and point-of-care diagnostics [17]. When the recognition element is combined with responsive mechanisms, biosensors can be effectively applied for analytical purposes. Specifically, in environmental science, SNAHs have been used to detect heavy metals, organic pollutants, and microbial contaminants, offering portable and low-cost alternatives to sophisticated analytical instruments [18]. In the food sector, they enable the sensitive detection of pesticide residues, toxins, and allergens, directly addressing consumer concerns about food quality and safety [19]. In the medical field, SNAH-based systems show promise for the early diagnosis of infectious diseases, detection of cancer biomarkers, and metabolic disorders [20]. Additionally, they hold great potential for coupling therapeutic agent release with diagnostic functions, thereby advancing the emerging concept of theranostics.
This review primarily focuses on advancements in biosensor technology, with a particular emphasis on biosensors based on SNAHs (shown in Figure 1). It begins by introducing the integration of recognition elements into SNAHs, followed by a comprehensive classification of stimulus-responsive factors based on eight distinct mechanisms. The review also extensively discusses the applications of SNAHs in key fields, including environmental monitoring, food safety, and disease diagnosis and detection. Additionally, it provides profound insights into future directions for optimizing SNAH-based biosensors to facilitate their practical, real-world use. This work aims to serve as a valuable reference for the design and application of hydrogel-based biosensors.

2. Molecular Recognition Elements in SNAHs

Molecular recognition elements demonstrate exceptional selectivity and high affinity toward biological analytes; however, their intrinsic stability limitations significantly impede their practical implementation. To address this challenge, SNAHs, endowed with superior biocompatibility, programmability, and functional integration capacity, provide a robust solution to mitigate the stability issues of molecular recognition elements. This section will elaborate on the key recognition elements, encompassing their fundamental working principles and representative design strategies for their integration into hydrogel networks. These essential components collectively lay a solid foundation for the subsequent signal-responsive functionalities in SNAHs.

2.1. Aptamer

Aptamers are short single-stranded oligonucleotides isolated from artificially synthesized random nucleotide libraries via the Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment (SELEX) technique [21]. They bind diverse targets with high specificity and affinity, a property facilitated by their facile in vitro synthesis, modification, and sequence design. These attributes enable not only diverse target recognition but also highly sensitive detection, with binding constants ranging from micromolar to picomolar concentrations [22]. Based on the Watson–Crick base-pairing principle, the programmability of aptamers permits their rational integration into SNAHs, primarily through two canonical strategies that underpin the stimulus-responsive behavior of such hydrogels.
For one, aptamers can act as monovalent crosslinkers [23]. Although this strategy is conceptually elegant, purely DNA-based hydrogels formed via aptamer-complementary strand self-assembly often require large quantities of DNA and may exhibit mechanical instability during cargo release—two factors that limit their practical applicability. Consequently, this approach is less commonly employed in hydrogels. For another, aptamers can function as polyvalent functional nodes, serving as repeating units within the structural scaffold of the hydrogel [24]. Hybrid SNAHs, in turn, can be constructed using such polyvalent functional nodes—with methods including rolling circle amplification (RCA) and branched DNA self-assembly (Figure 2A). RCA is particularly effective in this regard, enabling the enzymatic synthesis of ultralong single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) containing tandem-arrayed aptamer motifs [3]. For example, Yao et al. [25] developed an RCA-based DNA hydrogel integrated with cell-targeting aptamer sequences. This assembly was mediated by the synergistic effects of chain entanglement, multi-primed chain amplification, and hybridization with aptamer-functionalized moieties. Branched crosslinking is another widely used strategy for the self-assembly of DNA hydrogels, typically employing X-shaped, Y-shaped, or T-shaped DNA scaffolds as building blocks [26]. In this approach, specific sticky-end hybridization between complementary DNA backbones and crosslinkers drives the formation of a three-dimensional (3D) hydrogel network. Incorporating aptamer sequences into the sticky ends not only mediates physical crosslinking but also ensures that the aptamers’ target-binding domains are presented in sterically accessible conformations. For example, Chang et al. [27] designed two Y-type DNA building blocks, replacing the “sticky-end” segment in one branch with an aptamer sequence targeting the B subunit of Shiga toxin II (Figure 2B). Likewise, replacing a non-functional palindromic fragment in Y-shaped DNA with the sgc8 aptamer yields a targeted functional DNA hydrogel [28]. Evidently, nucleic acid hydrogels serve as a protective matrix that enhances aptamers’ resistance against nuclease degradation, thereby providing a promising platform for targeted therapy. Beyond DNA aptamers, RNA aptamers have also been exploited for self-assembly into RNA hydrogels, which mitigate the intrinsic chemical instability of RNA and address the limitations of existing RNA-related technologies to a certain extent [29]. For instance, Huang et al. demonstrated that two functional RNA aptamer motifs, M1 and M2, can specifically co-assemble into stable RNA hydrogels. In this system, M1 contains an all-A loop sequence, which is a key motif driving assembly [30].

2.2. DNAzymes

DNAzymes are functional nucleic acids with catalytic activity, characterized by both reaction and substrate specificity as well as remarkable selectivity for metal ions. They typically catalyze the hydrolysis of phosphodiester bonds at specific sites within nucleic acid substrates, thereby mediating precise cleavage of nucleic acid strands. Generally, the enzyme chain can quickly cleave the specific site of the substrate chain with the assistance of metal ions or amino acids acting as co-catalysts, while the cleavage efficiency is affected by the DNAzyme concentration and the number of sequences binding on the substrate surface [32]. Therefore, DNAzymes integrated into DNA hydrogels endow biomaterials with catalytic abilities and molecular recognition functions [33,34]. Among them, the G-quadruplex/hemin complex stands out as an artificial DNAzyme with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-mimicking activity.
The incorporation of DNAzymes into hydrogel is primarily achieved through covalent conjugation or physical encapsulation [35]. This three-dimensional network not only stabilizes the DNAzyme but also provides a favorable microenvironment for its catalytic function and electron transfer. A prevalent strategy leverages in situ synthesis and self-assembly. For instance, Mao et al. [36] predesigned G-rich sequences into a hyperbranched rolling circle amplification (HRCA) template, enabling the spontaneous formation of G-quadruplex structures within the hydrogel scaffold during synthesis (shown in Figure 3A). Upon binding hemin, these structures became functional DNAzymes, enabling a one-pot construction of catalytic hydrogels capable of electron transfer or of generating a colorimetric signal in the ABTS-H2O2 system [37]. Another common approach involves designing the DNAzyme itself as a stimulus-responsive crosslinker. Jiang et al. [38] engineered a Pb2+-binding DNAzyme strand together with a substrate strand containing ribonucleotides. The substrate-mediated base pairing was integrated into the hydrogel as both a responsive unit and a crosslinker. Similarly, DNA hydrogels constructed from three-way junction scaffolds have been functionalized with Ca2+-dependent DNAzymes [39] or Zn2+-dependent DNAzymes through substrate sequence incorporation [40]. Beyond single-enzyme designs, the intrinsic catalytic properties of DNAzymes have also been harnessed for building multienzyme hydrogel systems. For example, Xiang et al. [41] extended X-shaped DNA motifs using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase to incorporate peroxidase-mimicking DNAzymes, thereby developing a self-assembled DNA hydrogel endowed with catalytic functionality (shown in Figure 3B).
Aptamers and DNAzymes exhibit unparalleled programmability and tunability, a core advantage that provides crucial support for constructing precisely engineered hydrogel systems with responsive and self-reporting capabilities. However, these nucleic acid-based molecular recognition elements have two inherent limitations: susceptibility to nuclease degradation and reliance on specific ionic conditions for functionality, which severely restrict their long-term stability and performance in complex biological microenvironments (e.g., body fluids, extracellular matrix).

2.3. Antibodies

Antibodies, owing to their high specificity and functional diversity, have been widely applied in bioanalysis and separation technologies [42]. With the continuous advances in antibody production and modification technologies, their integration into nucleic acid hydrogels has shown great promise. As carriers, nucleic acid hydrogels can effectively protect antibodies from protease-mediated degradation and prolong their in vivo activity [43,44]. Simultaneously, conjugating antibodies with nucleic acids to construct multifunctional and highly stable DNA–protein chimeras represents a highly promising strategy [45].
The coupling of antibodies and nucleic acids is principally classified into two major categories: covalent and non-covalent construction [46]. Covalent conjugation is typically facilitated by chemical crosslinkers, such as glutaraldehyd and 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide/N-Hydroxysuccinimide (EDC/NHS) systems. An alternative strategy involves terminal modifications coupled with specific bio-orthogonal reactions, a prominent example being the widely utilized thiol–maleimide reaction. In contrast, non-covalent conjugation predominantly relies on engineered or natural intermolecular affinities. Among these, the biotin–streptavidin system is particularly notable for achieving a high degree of specificity and binding affinity. In this approach, either the antibody or the nucleic acid can be efficiently biotinylated for subsequent binding to a streptavidin-conjugated counterpart. Other non-covalent methods may leverage direct natural interactions between proteins and nucleic acids [47,48]. In general, non-covalent approaches are more straightforward to implement compared with covalent methods. For instance, Zhang et al. [49] designed antibody–DNA chimeras for hydrogel functionalization, in which streptavidin was used to bridge biotinylated antibodies and biotinylated single-stranded nucleic acids. These chimeric systems enable dynamic regulation via DNA-mediated reversible hybridization while retaining specific recognition of target cells. Furthermore, Peng et al. [50] integrated silver nanoclusters (AgNCs) and antibody-based immunotherapy into DNA hydrogels. DNA sequences stabilized on the surface of AgNCs could hybridize with complementary strands, while the other terminus of the DNA sequences was conjugated to tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) antibodies via common biomolecular coupling strategies (shown in Figure 4A). This process led to the formation of a quaternary “AgNCs–Y–L monomer–TNF-α antibody” complex, thereby enabling the controlled release of antibodies from the hydrogel matrix.
As classical biological recognition elements, antibodies exhibit exceptional target affinity and strong biological relevance; however, their practical application remains constrained by several inherent limitations. Specifically, their relatively large molecular size leads to increased mass transfer resistance within hydrogel networks, while the high production cost impedes large-scale and cost-effective implementation. Moreover, their structural fragility under harsh conditions, such as extreme pH, elevated temperature, or exposure to organic solvents, further restricts their stable integration into hydrogel matrices.

2.4. Peptides

Peptides, owing to their remarkable molecular recognition ability, have emerged as versatile templates for constructing specific probes to detect diverse biomarkers [52]. A representative example is antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), which function as novel recognition agents and enable the targeted identification of pathogenic bacteria through specific electrostatic interactions with lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) and other negatively charged molecules on bacterial membranes, with their amino acid sequences determining recognition specificity [53,54]. In addition, peptides, due to their small molecular size and high environmental stability, can exhibit exclusive binding affinity to specific materials via conformational adaptability and intermolecular forces. Typical examples include the polystyrene-binding peptide and polypropylene-binding peptide, which facilitate the detection of microplastics [55].
In SNAH-based sensing systems, the recognition capability and amphiphilic nature of peptides synergistically function to reduce nonspecific adsorption by optimizing the distribution of recognition sites [56]. He et al. [57] designed a zwitterionic peptide, which was covalently coupled to the carboxyl groups on a Y-shaped DNA scaffold via an NHS/EDC activation system, and subsequently integrated into the DNA hydrogel network. Similarly, Li et al. [58] constructed DNA–peptide hybrid hydrogels by crosslinking with X-shaped DNA linkers via precise molecular recognition through a Cu+-catalyzed click chemistry reaction. Notably, click chemistry exhibits mild reaction conditions, no byproducts, and nanometer-scale modification precision. Wei et al. [59] further employed strain-promoted azide–alkyne cycloaddition to couple chemistry-modified branch-shaped DNA with azide-functionalized peptides at 4 °C, yielding peptide-functionalized DNA monomers (Figure 5A). Huang et al. [60] introduced both M6P molecules and VEGFR-targeting peptides into the Y-motif DNA scaffold via click chemistry, establishing a “dual-recognition site” system to address the limitation of insufficient binding strength from single-site recognition. To overcome the intrinsic challenge of poor binding efficiency, Yin et al. [61] synthesized a peptide–tFNA structure by conjugating peptides onto tetrahedral framework nucleic acids (tFNAs), where the 3D rigid geometry of tFNAs fixed peptides at specific spatial positions, thereby enhancing stability. Meanwhile, Obuobi et al. [62] proposed a distinct strategy by exploiting the electrostatic adsorption between AMPs and Y-shaped DNA monomers to construct peptide-loaded DNA hydrogels.
Peptides offer an attractive compromise between synthetic versatility and biological recognition, combining ease of chemical modification, favorable biocompatibility, and cost-effectiveness. These attributes position peptides as valuable complementary recognition units within SNAH-based biosensing frameworks. However, despite their structural adaptability, peptide-based systems often exhibit inherently lower selectivity toward small-molecule targets and weaker binding affinities—typically within the micromolar (μM) range—compared with the nanomolar (nM) or even picomolar (pM) affinities of nucleic acid- or antibody-based receptors. This limitation becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios demanding ultra-high specificity or quantitative discrimination among structurally similar analytes.

2.5. MIPs

MIPs, as a class of synthetic receptors with “molecular memory” characteristics, can form specific recognition sites through template-directed polymerization [63,64]. These recognition sites are complementary to the spatial conformation and chemical properties of target molecules. Owing to their high stability, low cost, and customizability, MIPs have emerged as important recognition units in nucleic acid hydrogels for biosensing [65].
The recognition mechanism of MIPs is selective binding with target molecules through non-covalent interactions or reversible covalent interactions [66]. Their recognition performance can be precisely tuned by rational selection of functional monomers, adjustment of crosslinking density, and optimization of imprinting strategies [67]. In SNAH systems, MIPs are generally integrated in two modes: for one, dispersing MIPs as functional fillers within the hydrogel network, in which their porous structures and specific cavities provide additional recognition sites [68]; for another, incorporating nucleic acid molecules (such as aptamers or DNA fragments) as imprinting templates or functional monomers to construct “nucleic acid–MIP” hybrid systems that achieve synergistically enhanced recognition performance [69]. In recent years, researchers have attempted to further improve the specificity and selectivity of MIPs by introducing functional units such as aptamers or boronic acid groups. Li et al. [70] employed an acrylamide-modified full-length adenosine aptamer as a macromonomer to copolymerize with 3-acrylamidophenylboronic acid, thereby combining the aptamer’s high specificity for the adenosine base with the covalent interaction between boronic acid and the cis-diol of ribose. This strategy led to the construction of a dual-recognition aptamer–MIP hydrogel. This hydrogel effectively overcame the inability of conventional adenosine aptamers to distinguish adenosine from structurally similar nucleosides (e.g., deoxyadenosine, cytidine). Moreover, the dual-recognition aptamer–MIP hydrogel maintained selective recognition in 5% fetal bovine serum, demonstrating superior performance compared to single aptamer systems. Similarly, Zhang et al. [71] used an acrylamide-modified adenosine aptamer fragment as a macromonomer to copolymerize with acrylamide and N-isopropylacrylamide (shown in Figure 5B). Through molecular imprinting, the spatial conformation of the fragment was fixed and its binding ability restored. This approach significantly enhanced the binding affinity of MIPs.
Figure 5. Design of peptide or MIP as recognition element in SNAHs. (A). Fabrication and characterization of the programmable DNA–peptide conjugated, exosome-loaded hydrogel [59]. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of DPE hydrogel; (b) SEM images of pure DNA hydrogel, DP hydrogel, and DPE hydrogel; (c) rheological testing of DNA hydrogels (D gel) and DP hydrogels; (d) the swelling character of DNA hydrogels and DP hydrogels in PBS at 37 °C. (B). The secondary structure of the adenosine aptamer, sequences of its fragments, the adenosine-binding and fluorescence-quenching mechanism of two fragments, and the preparation of adenosine–MIP and nonimprinted polymers with these aptamer fragments. TEMED and APS were used for initiation, and MBAAm was used as the crosslinker [71]. MIP: molecularly imprinted polymers; APS: ammonium persulfate; TEMED: N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine; MBAAm: methylene bis(acrylamide).
Figure 5. Design of peptide or MIP as recognition element in SNAHs. (A). Fabrication and characterization of the programmable DNA–peptide conjugated, exosome-loaded hydrogel [59]. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of DPE hydrogel; (b) SEM images of pure DNA hydrogel, DP hydrogel, and DPE hydrogel; (c) rheological testing of DNA hydrogels (D gel) and DP hydrogels; (d) the swelling character of DNA hydrogels and DP hydrogels in PBS at 37 °C. (B). The secondary structure of the adenosine aptamer, sequences of its fragments, the adenosine-binding and fluorescence-quenching mechanism of two fragments, and the preparation of adenosine–MIP and nonimprinted polymers with these aptamer fragments. TEMED and APS were used for initiation, and MBAAm was used as the crosslinker [71]. MIP: molecularly imprinted polymers; APS: ammonium persulfate; TEMED: N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine; MBAAm: methylene bis(acrylamide).
Biosensors 15 00799 g005
As fully synthetic molecular recognition elements, MIPs have attracted increasing interest for their remarkable mechanical stability, chemical resilience under harsh conditions, and scalability in production. These features make MIPs particularly appealing for constructing durable and cost-effective biosensing interfaces. Nonetheless, intrinsic limitations remain unresolved: incomplete template removal and the non-uniform spatial distribution of binding sites often compromise recognition fidelity, leading to slower binding kinetics and reduced specificity compared with biomacromolecular receptors. These shortcomings pose persistent challenges for the development of MIP-based sensors capable of rapid, high-fidelity detection.
From a performance optimization standpoint, hybridization strategies that combine distinct classes of molecular recognition elements are increasingly recognized as an effective means to transcend the intrinsic limitations of individual components (Table 1). Representative examples include aptamer–MIP composites and peptide–DNA hybrid hydrogels. These hybrid constructs not only reinforce signal reliability, reusability, and operational stability but also provide a conceptual framework to reconcile the longstanding trade-off between sensitivity and robustness. Such integrative designs pave the way for the next generation of biosensing platforms capable of reliable performance in complex clinical and environmental matrices.

3. Stimulus Response Mechanisms and Signal Transduction in SNAHs

Bridging molecular recognition and signal output, programmable structural changes are the core of SNAHs. These changes are engineered to respond to specific stimuli via two main paradigms. For one, physicochemical stimuli (e.g., pH, temperature) can directly induce structural transitions by exploiting the innate properties of nucleic acids (e.g., i-motif folding). For another, and more prominently, the binding or catalytic events involving recognition modules (aptamers, DNAzymes, antibodies, etc.) trigger pre-programmed structural reconfigurations, such as strand displacement or cleavage, leading to a macroscopic gel–sol transition. This section will detail how these mechanisms effectively convert a wide range of stimuli into measurable signals.

3.1. Temperature-Responsive SNAHs

Temperature-sensitive hydrogels are a representative category of smart responsive materials, whose physical properties can undergo reversible transitions upon exposure to external temperature changes [72]. Critically, temperature serves as a powerful switch to control molecular recognition within these hydrogels. By precisely manipulating the hybridization kinetics of nucleic acids and the phase behavior of functional polymers, temperature can act as a powerful switch to control the accessibility, affinity, and activity of embedded molecular recognition elements, thereby programming the sensing behavior of the hydrogel.
Since the stability of DNA duplexes and the folding of aptamers are highly temperature-dependent, the binding events can be designed to occur only within a specific temperature window. An elevated temperature can denature the duplexes that “lock” an aptamer in an inactive state, thereby activating its binding capability [73]. Beyond nucleic acids themselves, thermosensitive polymers like poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (pNIPAM) can amplify molecular recognition through macroscopic volume transitions. pNIPAM swells below its lower critical solution temperature (LCST) and shrinks above it due to hydration changes. This phase transition can mechanically transduce a molecular binding event into a pronounced physicochemical output [74]. For example, Chen et al. [75] designed pNIPAM-DNA hydrogels functionalized with aptamers specific to amyloid-β oligomers that can capture target molecules. In this system, the aptamer-mediated capture of the target is not the final signal but the trigger that initiates a downstream enzymatic reaction; the temperature-responsive hydrogel matrix then acts as a confined reactor, where the LCST behavior can potentially enhance the local concentration of reactants and the efficiency of the signal amplification process. Beyond intrinsic thermal response, the integration of photothermal nanomaterials allows for the remote and spatially precise control of molecular recognition. Moreover, the integration of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and gold nanorods (AuNRs) endows hydrogels with photothermal responsiveness through the localized surface plasmon resonance effect [76]. Upon laser irradiation, the localized heat generated by AuNPs/AuNRs induces the dissociation of DNA duplexes, thereby regulating hydrogel stiffness [77]. Wang et al. [78] demonstrated that the laser-induced heating of AuNPs could dissociate DNA crosslinkers, effectively using temperature as a tool to reconfigure the hydrogel network and thus control the diffusion and access to molecular recognition elements. The finding by Wang et al. [79] on the “breathing” dynamics of surface-grafted DNA strands further suggests that local thermal fluctuations can fine-tune the presentation and binding affinity of ligands, offering a nanoscale mechanism to modulate recognition kinetics.
In summary, temperature-responsive SNAHs exploit thermal energy to gate, activate, and enhance molecular recognition events, making these hydrogels powerful platforms for applications requiring precise temporal and spatial control.

3.2. Light-Responsive SNAHs

Light offers superior spatiotemporal precision as a non-invasive stimulus for controlling SNAHs [80], and it is usually reversible. The molecular recognition in these systems is uniquely gated by light, primarily through the integration of photoresponsive units that act as molecular switches or triggers (Figure 6A). Typical photoisomerizable molecules like azobenzene and arylazopyrazole [81] are capable of interacting with DNA, thereby enabling them to finely regulate the stability of double-stranded nucleic acids.
In common design strategies, azobenzene undergoes conformational transitions under irradiation with different wavelengths, thereby inducing the rupture and reformation of crosslinking points and driving reversible transitions between the hydrogel and solution states [82]. For example, Peng et al. [83] employed trans-azobenzene units to stabilize the double-stranded structure, whereas cis-azobenzene destabilized it, thus enabling light-induced reversible transitions. In general, most light-responsive DNA hydrogels are introduced by polymer matrices and synergistically stabilized by permanent crosslinking units, such as boronate ester/glucosamine and trans/cis photoisomerizable nucleic acid bridges [84]. Liu et al. [85] integrated both glucosamine-boronate ester bonds and trans-azobenzene-stabilized DNA duplex bridges as cooperative crosslinkers. Upon irradiation at 365 nm, azobenzene isomerizes from the trans to the cis form, resulting in hydrogel softening; exposure to light above 420 nm reverses the isomerization, restoring the hydrogel’s stiffness. In addition to these direct structural reconfigurations, light can also be harnessed to trigger more complex functional responses within SNAHs. For instance, nanomaterials like quantum dots (QDs) can be integrated to serve dual purposes. Upon light irradiation, QDs can act as efficient nanoscale heaters due to their excellent photothermal conversion efficiency, inducing localized heating that leads to volumetric changes in the hydrogel, such as swelling or collapse of the network [86]. Simultaneously, their strong photostability and tunable emission allow them to function as robust optical transducers, providing a real-time fluorescence readout of these physicochemical changes [87]. This dual functionality enables a self-reporting system where the actuation (physical response) and the sensing (optical signal) are intrinsically coupled. Beyond conformational switching, light can trigger a cascading amplification system (initiated by molecular recognition) by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), thereby enabling the integration of light into the system. Wang et al. [88] designed a DNA hydrogel where the primary molecular recognition of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) not only generated a fluorescence signal but also primed the system for a secondary, light-driven response (Figure 6B). Specifically, the ATP-binding event localized the photosensitizer Ce6. Subsequent localized irradiation then served as an orthogonal stimulus that activated Ce6, generating ROS. This cascade transduced and amplified the initial molecular recognition event into massive backbone cleavage, network disruption, and controlled drug release for synergistic therapy. Furthermore, research on light-responsive DNA hydrogels has been extended to near-infrared (NIR) light-triggered photothermal effects. Liu et al. [89] reported an injectable NIR-responsive hydrogel based on DNA-AuNP hybrid structures, where gold nanoparticles efficiently absorbed light energy via surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and converted it into thermal energy, thereby achieving controlled photothermal regulation of the hydrogel.
Figure 6. Light-responsive SNAHs. (A). Schematic illustration of the synthesis of stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels and photothermal sensing detection of miRNAs based on HRP-mediated TMB-H2O2 colorimetric system [90]. (B). Cyclic DNA templates containing complementary sequences of PD-L1 aptamer and CpG, along with photosensitizer Ce6-cDNA, were used for the synthesis of photoresponsive immunomodulatory hydrogels via a one-pot RCA reaction [88]. TMB: 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine; RCA: rolling circle amplification.
Figure 6. Light-responsive SNAHs. (A). Schematic illustration of the synthesis of stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels and photothermal sensing detection of miRNAs based on HRP-mediated TMB-H2O2 colorimetric system [90]. (B). Cyclic DNA templates containing complementary sequences of PD-L1 aptamer and CpG, along with photosensitizer Ce6-cDNA, were used for the synthesis of photoresponsive immunomodulatory hydrogels via a one-pot RCA reaction [88]. TMB: 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine; RCA: rolling circle amplification.
Biosensors 15 00799 g006

3.3. Magnetic-Responsive SNAHs

The responsive performance of magnetic hydrogels is highly dependent on the design and parameters of the applied magnetic field [91]. Previous studies have demonstrated two primary strategies for constructing magneto-responsive DNA hydrogels [92]. For one, embed magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) directly into the DNA hydrogel network. For another, integrate MNPs with DNA strands or their complementary sequences via chemical conjugation or DNA hybridization [93,94]. The incorporation of MNPs not only imparts remote manipulability under external magnetic fields but also significantly enhances the structural stability of the hydrogel. In practice, Ma et al. [95] designed a magneto-responsive DNA hydrogel in which DNA-modified MNPs were hybridized with Y-shaped DNA to achieve a hybridization-driven embedding. Upon application of an external magnetic field, the hydrogel exhibited multidirectional deformation and even remote locomotion along the substrate surface, offering novel strategies for cell culture and biomedical applications. Similarly, Tang et al. [96] employed RCA to generate ultralong ssDNA with capture sequences, which were subsequently hybridized with complementary strand-modified MNPs to fabricate a magnetic DNA hydrogel-based soft robot. This system could be magnetically guided to specific sites for controlled payload release, highlighting its potential as an intelligent tool for live-cell transport. Furthermore, Yao et al. [97] developed a magnetic hydrogel employing amino-functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles with RCA products via physical crosslinking, enabling magnetically controlled drug delivery and on-demand release, providing a promising strategy for precision medicine.
While traditional magnetic SNAHs primarily utilize magnetic nanoparticles for physical remote control, the integration of molecular recognition elements transforms them into precisely targeted and autonomously responsive systems. The future of magnetic-responsive SNAHs lies in moving beyond such simple physical remote control toward systems where magnetic fields and molecular recognition operate in concert. This synergy will enable sophisticated functions, such as autonomous target-driven drug release, highly sensitive remote biosensing, and real-time reporting of biochemical activity, thereby paving the way for next-generation precision medicine platforms.

3.4. pH-/Ion-Responsive SNAHs

The programmable secondary structures of nucleic acids confer an intrinsic sensitivity to the chemical environment, particularly to protons and specific metal ions [98]. This allows pH and ions to act as fundamental inputs for molecular recognition in SNAHs, triggering precise structural reconfigurations and signal transduction. Protons, as the primary regulators of pH, together with other metal ions, participate in the modulation of the acid–base equilibrium in solution, thereby influencing DNA conformations and hydrogel properties [99]. Among the typical motifs, cytosine-rich sequences can fold into i-motif structures under acidic conditions, while guanine-rich sequences fold into G-quadruplexes in the presence of K+ [100]. The formation of i-motif structures relies on the partial protonation of cytosine residues (pH = 6.5), which form C:C+ base pairs through Hoogsteen interactions and assemble into a stable tetraplex crosslinking unit. Conversely, adenine residues can be protonated in strongly acidic environments, forming A-motif structures [101]. These two types of structures often exhibit synergistic effects in hydrogels, and their acid–base transition processes have been utilized to simulate structural stability under different gastrointestinal environments [102].
DNA triplex structures provide another pathway for pH responsiveness. At pH 5.0, protonated C-G·C triplexes stabilize acidic conformations, while T-A·T triplexes remain stable under neutral conditions but dissociate into T-A duplexes under alkaline conditions (pH 10.0) due to thymine deprotonation [103]. Ren et al. have utilized this property to construct switchable triplex-based DNA hydrogels [104] (Figure 7A). Furthermore, duplex-based systems can also exhibit pH-responsive behavior. For example, adenine strands can assemble with the small-molecule drug coralyne (COR) to form a hydrogel stable at neutral pH. Lee et al. [105] found that upon pH variation, the instability of A-COR-A units leads to hydrogel disassembly accompanied by COR release, thereby enabling controlled drug delivery (Figure 7B).
In addition to proton-mediated mechanisms, metal ions also regulate DNA secondary structures, imparting ion-specific responsiveness to hydrogels. For instance, Pb2+ can induce DNAzyme folding into G-quadruplex structures, triggering sol–gel transitions [106]. Hg2+ can interact with thymine residues to form T-Hg2+-T hairpins [107], and Ag+ can coordinate with cytosine bases to form C-Ag+-C base pairs, leading to hydrogel contraction [108]. Notably, ZnO nanoparticles have been introduced as pH-responsive nanomaterials, which remain stable under neutral conditions but rapidly dissolve under acidic environments to release Zn2+ [109,110]. Yao et al. [111] demonstrated that pH-responsive DNA hydrogels, prepared by crosslinking carboxylated Y-DNA probes with aminated ZnO NPs, disintegrated under acidic conditions due to ZnO dissolution, releasing DNA probes and enabling sensitive miRNA detection through ratiometric fluorescence signals.

3.5. Nucleic Acid-Responsive SNAHs

Strand displacement reactions trigger a rapid cascade effect from assembly to disassembly in DNA hydrogels [112]. In this process, target nucleic acids competitively hybridize with DNA linkers in the hydrogel network, forming more stable base pairs and releasing the crosslinking chains, thereby inducing hydrogel degradation [113]. Lin et al. [114] first demonstrated this strategy by constructing DNA–polyacrylamide hydrogels crosslinked with double-stranded DNA, which dissociated upon the introduction of removal strands. Building on this concept, Ho et al. [115] designed adenine-rich oligonucleotides to replace melamine in T-MA-T duplexes, forming stable A-T structures that functioned as reversible “nanobridges” for hydrogel assembly and disassembly. Nucleic acid-triggered strand displacement can also be coupled with specific capture probes to achieve precise detection [116]. For instance, Guo et al. [117] constructed an aptamer-based hydrogel system responsive to the PML/RARα fusion gene. In this design, a PML/RARα-specific capture probe was immobilized on the gold surface of an SPR chip, while aptamers embedded in the hydrogel enriched streptavidin. The presence of the target nucleic acid triggered hydrogel rearrangement, leading to changes in molecular mass and local refractive index, thereby amplifying the detection signal.
RNA can also act as a trigger for hydrogel disassembly. Liu et al. [90] reported a DNA–polyacrylamide hydrogel responsive to microRNA (miRNA), where DNA linkers complementary to the target miRNA mediated gel collapse. The hybridization of miRNA with the linkers disrupted polyacrylamide crosslinks, leading to hydrogel disassembly and the release of encapsulated HRP. The released HRP catalyzed H2O2 decomposition, producing a photothermal signal under near-infrared irradiation and thereby enabling miRNA detection. Beyond this, strand displacement-activated DNA hydrogels have shown strong potential in miRNA biosensing [118]. For instance, a ratiometric fluorescence method employing Cy5-labeled DNA was applied to detect miRNA-21. Likewise, Chang et al. [119] proposed that miRNA-141 competitively displaces the bridge DNA within the hydrogel microcapsule shell, causing the capsule to disassemble and release quantum dots, which in turn enhances the fluorescence signal.

3.6. Protein-Responsive SNAHs

Protein-responsive SNAHs display a smart response to target proteins through specific molecular recognition, thereby inducing structural transformations or functional outputs [120]. Multiple strategies have been proposed surrounding aptamers and functional nucleases (e.g., Cas enzymes in the CRISPR-Cas system) [121,122]. For instance, Zhang et al. [123] reported a competitive binding regulation strategy, in which complementary DNA (cDNA) hybridizes with aptamers immobilized within the hydrogel, occupying their protein-binding sites and thereby inhibiting target protein capture. External stimuli (e.g., light or specific nucleic acid strands) can then induce cDNA dissociation, usually reversible.
Aptamers, as recognition elements, induce mainly protein responsiveness in SNAHs [124]. Sun et al. [125] constructed a mucin 1 protein (MUC1) detection platform by integrating DNAzyme and its substrate strand into a hydrogel matrix. Upon MUC1 binding, the DNAzyme is activated to cleave the substrate strand, and the resulting fragments induce changes in nanopore current, thereby achieving ultrasensitive detection of MUC1 or circulating tumor cells. Similarly, Ji et al. [126] designed a conformation-switching hydrogel, in which a hairpin aptamer specific for carcinoembryonic antigen was covalently grafted onto a poly(methacrylic acid) backbone via amide bonds. The binding of antigen to the aptamer triggered the opening of the toehold region, altering molecular conformation and inducing macroscopic responses such as hydrogel swelling or degradation.
SNAHs constructed through enzyme-specific recognition enable dynamic control over material properties and versatile signal transduction, leveraging the high specificity and catalytic efficiency of enzymatic reactions [127]. Gao et al. [128] designed a DNA tetrahedral framework hydrogel with edge chains containing Dam methyltransferase recognition sites. Dam-mediated adenine methylation altered DNA intermolecular interactions, modulated crosslinking density, and enabled signal readout through a personal glucose meter, thereby achieving specific detection of Dam methyltransferase. Furthermore, Gayet et al. [129] incorporated the CRISPR-Cas system into responsive hydrogels by using ssDNA bridge strands containing Cas12a-crRNA target sequences to crosslink DNA–polyacrylamide hydrogels.

3.7. Small Molecule-Responsive SNAHs

Small-molecule-responsive SNAHs generally exploit the specific recognition ability of aptamers to capture small molecular analytes, such as antibiotics (e.g., kanamycin, tetracycline) and biotoxins (e.g., cocaine, ATP) [130,131,132]. As molecular switches, aptamers trigger allosteric effects upon interacting with target molecules within the confined three-dimensional space of the hydrogel. These conformational changes are further transduced into amplified signals through fluorescence, spectroscopy, or electrochemical readouts, thereby enabling highly sensitive detection [133].
In the antibiotic detection context, Chen et al. [134] developed a kanamycin aptamer-based sensor employing surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Upon binding to kanamycin, the aptamer underwent a conformational change that released the primers, thereby initiating RCA and forming a DNA hydrogel network embedded with gold nanoparticles and magnetic beads. The quantification of hydrogel formation enabled the real-time and highly sensitive detection of kanamycin [135]. Moreover, signal amplification strategies based on DNA walkers have also been applied to antibiotic detection. For instance, Sun et al. [136] designed a DNA walker system using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads functionalized with hairpin DNA. In the presence of cephalosporin antibiotics, the walking strand was activated to trigger nuclease cleavage, cutting FAM-labeled hairpin structures and generating fluorescence signals, thereby enabling highly accurate detection. In the toxin detection domain, Li et al. [137] proposed a capillary self-driven regulator sensor capable of converting cocaine-induced microstructural changes in DNA hydrogels into macroscopic flow-rate signals (Figure 8A). Mechanistically, cocaine binding to the aptamer increases the permeability of hydrogel membranes, altering the flow duration of sample solutions within capillaries and thus enabling quantitative detection based on time parameters. In the ATP-responsive system, ATP aptamers specifically bind to ATP molecules, competitively dissociating complementary hybridized strands and thereby regulating the conformation and crosslinking density of the hydrogel [138]. This mechanism enables in situ and hierarchical modulation of the hydrogel’s mechanical properties. Xu et al. [139] designed a nanogel, for which, in the presence of ATP, aptamer binding triggers the disassembly of nanogels and the release of the encapsulated anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX), enabling the dual functions of chemotherapy and fluorescence imaging in cancer cells (Figure 8B).

3.8. Pathogen-Responsive SNAHs

The rapid and specific detection of pathogens such as bacteria and viruses is critical for public health [140]. Pathogen-responsive SNAHs address this need by integrating specific molecular recognition elements for whole pathogens or their unique components, and transducing binding events into macroscopic signals through programmable structural changes in the hydrogel network.
For bacteria-responsive systems, the molecular recognition primarily targets surface antigens or employs charge interactions, leading to therapeutic or diagnostic outputs. Obuobi et al. [62] achieved this through electrostatic interactions between polyanionic DNA nanostructures and cationic AMPs, which could respond to pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus infection and exhibited notable antibacterial potential. In the context of detection, nucleic acid aptamers are often employed as crosslinkers within the hydrogel while simultaneously functioning as signal transducers. For instance, Yu et al. [141] modified a Vibrio parahaemolyticus (V.P.) aptamer onto the cap of an Eppendorf tube and, by employing ATP as a signal mediator, designed an intelligent aptamer–hydrogel sensor capable of quantitatively detecting V.P.
Virus-responsive SNAHs predominantly rely on the recognition of unique viral nucleic acid sequences, which are then amplified to induce structural changes in the hydrogel for ultrasensitive detection [142]. Na et al. [143] employed viral nucleic acids as trigger signals and achieved RCA within microfluidic channels, where the amplified DNA hybridized with dumbbell-shaped padlock probes to form DNA hydrogels, ultimately leading to channel blockage and enabling the visual identification of viral presence. Similarly, Kin et al. [144] reported a DNA hydrogel detection platform based on RCA that enabled highly sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 within 15 min, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.7 aM, comparable to conventional PCR. Furthermore, Jiao et al. [145] use SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids as triggering signals. An EXPAR–DNAzyme cascade was integrated to cleave L-DNA crosslinkers. This molecular recognition event was effectively converted into macroscopic readouts such as colorimetric and thermal signals [9].

4. Application of SNAHs in Biosensors

Given the exceptional molecular recognition capabilities and stimulus-responsive properties of SNAHs described earlier, this chapter will thoroughly explore their extensive applications in biosensors for human health.

4.1. Environmental Monitoring

Heavy metal ions and organic pollutants in the environment are resistant to microbial degradation and tend to accumulate persistently in organisms and ecosystems [146]. Through strong interactions with biomacromolecules such as proteins, they induce significant toxicity, thereby posing serious threats to both ecological balance and human health [147]. Consequently, the development of rapid and highly sensitive detection technologies for heavy metal ions in water has long been a central challenge in environmental monitoring. Conventional approaches, such as inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and chromatography, offer high sensitivity but suffer from limitations including operational complexity, high instrumentation costs, and strict laboratory requirements, making them unsuitable for rapid on-site screening [148,149]. In recent years, SNAHs-based biosensing systems have emerged as a promising alternative. They harness functional nucleic acids, primarily aptamers or DNAzymes, that undergo conformational changes upon specific binding to target ions, subsequently transducing the interaction into measurable physical signals (e.g., fluorescence, colorimetric, or electrochemical outputs) [150]. Furthermore, embedding recognition nucleic acids into three-dimensional hydrogel networks enables the construction of intelligent responsive platforms that combine molecular recognition with intrinsic signal amplification.
Representative analytes of environmental concern include Pb2+, Hg2+, UO22+, and Cd2+. For instance, Pb2+-specific DNAzymes activate catalytic cleavage of substrate strands upon binding, leading to hydrogel network disassembly and release of encapsulated fluorophores, thereby enabling trace-level detection. In Hg2+ detection, early studies exploited thymine-rich DNA sequences that form T-Hg2+-T coordination structures for selective recognition [151,152]. However, interference from complex sample matrices remains a major obstacle to ultratrace detection. To address this challenge, Pi et al. [153] integrated nucleic acid recognition with the diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) technique, creating a DNA-DGT sensor. This device integrates a DNA-functionalized hydrogel with high load-carrying capacity into the DGT, enabling the complete process of mercury ion transport from diffusion to binding and subsequent encapsulation within the protective structure. Leveraging specific interactions, the system effectively excludes competing ions, allowing direct quantitative readout via fluorescence without complex sample pretreatment. This facilitates rapid on-site monitoring of Hg2+. Nevertheless, the reliance on gel imaging systems for signal readout still limits the portability and device integration. To simplify detection workflows and reduce costs, Chu et al. [154] reported a one-step pure DNA hydrogel sensor. In this design, Pb2+ activates DNAzyme cleavage of substrate strands, inducing hydrogel collapse and releasing DNA fragments that can be directly monitored by absorbance. This platform achieved a detection limit of 7.7 nM, with a linear response in the range of 0–500 nM, while eliminating the need for additional labeling, thus offering operational simplicity and cost efficiency. For uranyl ion (UO22+) detection, SERS has been employed for signal amplification. He et al. [155] developed a flexible DNAzyme-based SERS hydrogel sensor, in which UO22+ induces substrate cleavage and triggers the release of rhodamine B (RhB), producing the first stage of signal amplification. Subsequently, RhB molecules are captured by Ag-NPs@PAN films, resulting in further SERS enhancement as a second amplification stage. This dual-amplification strategy successfully integrates the flexibility of DNA hydrogels with SERS technology, providing a robust platform for the ultrasensitive detection of toxic metals in harsh environments. Given the chemical complexity of environmental pollutants, the development of multiplexed and universal detection platforms is highly desirable. Liu et al. [156] employed a layer-by-layer assembly strategy to fabricate ultrathin functional films enriched with AuNPs. In the presence of Pb2+ or UO22+, activation of the corresponding DNAzyme triggered substrate cleavage, leading to film degradation and release of AuNPs, which produced visually detectable colorimetric responses. By programming different DNA sequence codes, this platform achieved specific recognition of multiple metal ions, thereby enhancing both detection sensitivity and device stability, as well as storage robustness.
Beyond heavy metals, NAH-based strategies have also been extended to the detection of organic pollutants. Liu et al. [157] designed a dual-mode colorimetric/electrochemical sensor integrated into a microfluidic chip, employing a ferrocene-labeled malathion aptamer (MAF) as both recognition unit and hydrogel crosslinker. Specific binding between malathion and MAF triggered hydrogel disassembly, releasing encapsulated AuNPs to produce colorimetric signals, while simultaneously reducing electrochemical currents for quantitative readout. This system demonstrated portability, rapid detection, and no requirement for sample pretreatment. Moreover, with the rising concern over microplastic pollution, DNA aptamers specific to polyvinyl chloride and polystyrene have recently been identified [158], providing a foundation for developing NAH-based microplastic sensors.
The applications of SNAHs in biosensors for environmental monitoring are shown in Table 2. To further improve detection performance, additional amplification strategies have been incorporated into NAH sensing platforms, including capillary flow regulation [38], CRISPR/Cas systems [159], and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) [160]. These innovations not only enhance sensitivity and resistance to interference but also facilitate the evolution of NAH sensors from single-analyte detection toward multiplexed, on-site environmental monitoring, highlighting their strong potential for practical applications.

4.2. Food Safety

Food safety has been an enduring core topic of public health. The presence of pesticide residues, mycotoxin contamination, pathogenic microbes, and illegal food additives [162] renders strict screening, early warning, and prevention necessary. Conventional detection methods, like liquid chromatography (LC), gas chromatography (GC), and fluorescence detection–mass spectrometry (FLD-MS), offer high accuracy but face two critical limitations. For one, they require tedious and time-consuming sample pretreatment. For another, they rely on large-scale, non-portable laboratory equipment [163,164]. This makes them unable to meet real-world needs for rapid and on-site detection. Against this demand for more efficient technologies, SNAHs emerge as a promising solution [165]. Their core advantages directly address conventional methods’ shortcomings: good bearing capacity, facile functionalization, and diverse signal transduction [166]. Collectively, these traits make SNAHs an ideal platform for rapid safety monitoring.
Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by specific fungi, including aflatoxins (AFs), ochratoxin A (OTA), zearalenone (ZEN), fumonisin B1 (FB1), T-2 toxin, etc. [167]. Even at trace levels, these toxins exert pronounced toxicity, causing severe damage to the liver, kidneys, and immune system. Hence, the development of highly sensitive and field-deployable detection strategies is of paramount importance. In this regard, SNAH-based sensing systems have been reported for multiple mycotoxin detection. For example, Lin et al. [168] constructed a DNA hydrogel incorporating the T-2 toxin aptamer and a copper-based metal–organic framework (Cu3(HHTP)2). Upon target binding, the hydrogel disintegrated, releasing MOF particles that catalyzed TMB color development for qualitative analysis, while their photothermal effect under laser irradiation enabled quantitative detection in grain samples. For ZEN detection, Sun et al. [169] developed a hyaluronic acid–DNA hybrid hydrogel sensor that integrated ZEN aptamers into the network and employed hybridization chain reaction amplification on Ce–Zr bimetallic MOFzymes. Binding-induced hydrogel degradation exposed the MOFzyme surface, catalyzing substrate oxidation and enabling ultrasensitive colorimetric detection in maize and soybeans. FB1 was detected using a magnetic bead-assisted entropy-driven catalytic cycle, where aptamer-functionalized DNA tetrahedra released catalytic DNA upon target recognition, triggering hydrogel cleavage and exposure of embedded Mn–Zr MOFzymes. This system achieved an ultralow detection limit of 0.38 pg/mL and demonstrated potential for multiplexed detection [170]. For aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), Li et al. reported an “on–off” fluorescence sensor using upconversion nanoparticles (CSUCNPs) and ZIF-8@Cu2+ composites, while Hao et al. [171] realized highly sensitive OTA detection in beer through aptamer-triggered RCA that generated fluorescent DNA hydrogels. Notably, SNAHs also support multiplexed detection. Aran et al. [172] constructed a dual-responsive hydrogel system capable of simultaneously detecting chloramphenicol (CAP) and aflatoxin M1 (AFM1), achieving visual sol–gel transition and fluorescence readouts in milk, thereby offering valuable insights into multi-analyte food safety analysis.
Beyond mycotoxins, SNAHs have been applied to the detection of algal toxins, foodborne pathogens, and illegal additives, underscoring their versatility and on-site applicability. For algal toxins, Wu et al. [173] designed a microcystin (MC)-LR responsive DNA hydrogel encapsulating Cu/Au/Pt trimetallic nanozymes. Target binding led to hydrogel disassembly and nanozyme release, catalyzing the TMB–H2O2 color reaction for sensitive colorimetric detection in water and fish samples. In pathogen detection, Mann et al. [174] reported an Escherichia coli-responsive DNAzyme hydrogel sensor triggered by the specific protein ECP1. Upon activation, DNAzyme-mediated hydrogel degradation released embedded AuNPs, generating colorimetric signals. Coupled with machine learning, this system enabled the accurate and automated identification of E. coli in complex matrices such as clinical urine, highlighting its potential in water monitoring and rapid diagnostics. Illegal additives represent another critical focus of food safety regulation. Wang et al. [175] developed a melamine (MEL) aptamer-based hybrid hydrogel, where MEL binding disrupted the hydrogel and released AuNPs, producing visual or spectrophotometric colorimetric signals. Integrated with microfluidic chips and a smartphone readout, this system enabled portable, quantitative detection of MEL in dairy and pet food. Similarly, Bian et al. [176] reported a ractopamine (RAC) aptamer-crosslinked hydrogel embedding Au@Pd bimetallic nanozymes. RAC binding induces hydrogel collapse and nanozyme release, significantly amplifying colorimetric responses for ultrasensitive detection in meat samples.
The applications of SNAHs in biosensors for food safety are shown in Table 3. Undoubtedly, SNAHs show significant potential for contaminant detection, despite facing notable challenges in complex food matrices. Their compatibility with portable platforms, such as microfluidic devices [177] and smartphone-based systems, supports their field-ready use in food safety supervision.

4.3. Disease Diagnosis

The core of biosensors in disease diagnosis lies in the highly precise monitoring of specific biomarkers [179]. Pathological processes, including the onset and progression of diseases, are frequently associated with characteristic alterations in biomolecules. These changes, which may involve the expression levels of specific proteins, metabolic small molecules, viral antigens, or the occurrence of structural abnormalities, provide a critical foundation for early diagnosis. Conventional hydrogel-based biosensors often encapsulate enzymes to achieve colorimetric sensing, as demonstrated in platforms for monitoring metabolites like lactic acid [180]. In contrast, SNAH-based biosensors relying on their specific recognition units can capture target molecules and leverage the environmentally responsive properties of hydrogels to convert biorecognition events into detectable signals, thereby enabling rapid and sensitive disease diagnosis [35,181].
In cancer diagnostics, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) serves as an important serum biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma, with significant clinical value [182]. Wang et al. [183] proposed a DNA hydrogel-based sensor, in which an AFP-specific aptamer was used as a crosslinker to construct a three-dimensional network. When AFP binds to the aptamer, the hydrogel structure disassembles and releases the pre-encapsulated IgG. The released IgG then forms a sandwich complex with SERS probes and magnetic beads. After magnetic separation, the decrease in SERS signal intensity in the supernatant allows for the quantitative detection of AFP. This strategy is not only applicable to liver cancer screening but can also be extended to other tumor biomarkers by replacing the aptamer with a corresponding one. For cancer therapy monitoring, Borum et al. [184] developed an injectable DNA hydrogel system for real-time monitoring of chemotherapeutic drugs. This system used a DNA-crosslinked hydrogel that has a high affinity for doxorubicin-methylene blue conjugates (MB-Dox). In the tumor microenvironment, the hydrogel is enzymatically degraded, releasing MB-Dox. The alteration in the aggregation state of MB-Dox resulting from this degradation leads to enhanced and red-shifted photoacoustic signals. By integrating multi-wavelength photoacoustic imaging, the system allows for dynamic monitoring of drug release. Beyond protein biomarkers, miRNAs have also emerged as crucial indicators for early cancer diagnosis. Si et al. [185] developed a sensor array based on multicomponent nucleic acid enzymes (MNAzymes), in which the recognition unit consists of DNAzymes (activated by specific miRNAs) embedded in a DNA hydrogel. When target miRNAs are present, the MNAzymes are activated to cleave the hydrogel crosslinkers, leading to hydrogel disintegration and the release of previously blocked SERS tags—this converts the signal from an “off” to an “on” state. This platform enables the quantitative detection of multiple cancer-related miRNAs in serum, achieving a detection limit as low as 0.11 nM and providing a promising approach for early cancer screening.
In infectious disease diagnosis, the rapid detection of viral nucleic acids is of paramount importance. To this end, functional nanomaterials such as graphene [186] and QDs have been integrated with specific molecular recognition elements to construct advanced biosensing platforms. For instance, Xu et al. [187] designed a QD–aptamer sensor including a QD fluorescent reporter gene. This system relies on the specific binding between the aptamer and the viral target, which induces volumetric changes in the hydrogel matrix. Subsequently, this physical transformation alters the fluorescence emission of the embedded QD reporters, enabling rapid, on-site monitoring of the virus. In a separate approach aimed at instrument-free detection, Wonhwi Na et al. [143] reported a microfluidic sensor that operates without external instrumentation. The system uses primers immobilized on microbeads and dumbbell-shaped DNA as recognition templates. Upon the presence of target viral RNA, a ligase-mediated reaction initiates RCA, producing long DNA strands that self-assemble into a macroscopic hydrogel. The formation of this hydrogel physically obstructs the microfluidic channels, providing a direct visual readout. This platform demonstrated the capability for simultaneous detection of multiple pathogens, including Ebola virus and MERS-CoV, within 15 min, highlighting its significant potential for rapid on-site screening. In the field of infection and metabolic monitoring, hydrogel sensors also show distinctive advantages [188]. Li et al. [189] designed a DNAzyme-responsive wireless sensor, in which the DNAzyme secreted by Staphylococcus aureus degrades the hydrogel, causing changes in electrical signals. By integrating near-field communication (NFC), wound infection monitoring can be conducted via smartphones. Additionally, Žuržul et al. [4] developed a potassium ion sensor based on G-quadruplex conformational transitions. The binding of K+ ions to the aptamer induces changes in hydrogel swelling; these changes are converted into optical signals via fiber interferometry, enabling the continuous monitoring of K+ in blood and providing valuable support for electrolyte management in intensive care. For in vivo monitoring, Li et al. [190] further designed an aptamer-based sensor suitable for physiological environments. Target binding induces conformational changes to regulate electrochemical signal output, while an agarose hydrogel coating effectively reduces biofouling and signal drift. This device enables the real-time monitoring of small molecules (such as antibiotics) in whole blood, tissues, and even live blood vessels, exhibiting excellent biocompatibility and clinical application potential.
The applications of SNAHs in biosensors for disease diagnosis are shown in Table 4. Research shows that peptide-functionalized DNA hydrogels are increasingly being explored in cell culture and tissue engineering, where they serve as intelligent coating materials with potential for integration into diagnostic platforms [191]. Furthermore, the combination of MIP technology with aptamers enhances the stability and selectivity of recognition units [192]. MIP-functionalized DNA hydrogels are expected to achieve more efficient target capture and signal transduction in complex biological samples, driving disease diagnostics toward higher sensitivity, greater multifunctionality, and real-time continuous monitoring.

5. Conclusions and Prospects

SNAHs are regarded as the core breakthrough of the next generation of intelligent biosensing units. Innovatively, this review proposes an integrated “recognition-decision–execution” framework that systematically maps diverse SNAH designs to specific stimuli and application scenarios. This framework provides a unified conceptual model for the rational design of intelligent sensing systems, thereby highlighting the unique conceptual advancement of this review over previous summaries. We systematically summarize the design principles of SNAHs based on molecular recognition modules, their stimuli-responsive mechanisms, and recent advances in applications spanning environmental monitoring, food safety, and disease diagnosis. From a construction perspective, different recognition elements exhibit distinct integration strategies. Specifically, aptamers and DNAzymes can serve as intrinsic structural components of hydrogels fabricated via nucleic acid self-assembly techniques like branched crosslinking or RCA. In contrast, other recognition elements are typically incorporated through chemical conjugation or physical encapsulation. Crucially, SNAHs are not merely passive, inert scaffolds. Leveraging the programmability of nucleic acids, they can actively function as integrated sensing elements, thereby unifying the scaffold and recognition functions—a distinctive advantage in biosensing. Overall, recognition modules function as the sensing triggering elements of SNAHs, while diverse physical, chemical, and biological responsive mechanisms provide pathways for signal transduction and output. The synergy between these two components establishes complete sensing circuits. Through flexible combinations of recognition units and responsive modes, researchers are able to design customized sensing platforms for specific targets, offering crucial technological support across environmental health, food safety, and biomedical diagnostics. Looking forward, SNAHs for biosensing applications still face key challenges as well as promising opportunities for development.
  • Expansion of recognition targets and development of next-generation intelligent responsive modules. Future advancements of SNAHs should prioritize the fundamental optimization of sequence stability, structural precision, and selective recognition before enabling more advanced smart sensing functions. Correspondingly, the next research phase should focus on enhancing AI- or machine learning-assisted nucleic acid sequence engineering to improve binding affinity, prediction accuracy, and structural robustness. Furthermore, the rational integration of non-natural functional groups (e.g., hydrophobic moieties, redox-active groups, photocrosslinkers, and metal-coordination sites, etc.) should be guided by well-documented mechanisms derived from existing SNAH systems, rather than being proposed as a generic strategy.
  • Advancement of multiplexed detection and multimodal signal output strategies. To address the growing demand for parallel, high-content analysis, future SNAH systems should focus on integrating multiple recognition modules with well-defined logic-gating circuits to achieve accurate multiplexed decision-making. This step represents the second tier of development, which is only feasible after resolving foundational issues related to stability and specificity. Regarding external stimuli, the systems reviewed in this work suggest several priority directions. Optical stimuli offer high spatiotemporal precision suitable for in vitro and wearable monitoring; magnetic fields provide deep-tissue penetration and remote actuation ideal for in vivo sensing; electrical stimulation is highly compatible with flexible electronics. Importantly, machine learning-guided optimization of hydrogel composition, porosity, and signal-transduction pathways could offer automated strategies for improving multiplex sensing fidelity.
  • Promotion of theranostic integration, microfluidic convergence, and wearable applications. Given their biocompatibility and programmability, SNAHs offer substantial advantages for future translational use. Beyond conventional drug delivery, hybrid organic–inorganic or multi-stimuli composite hydrogels (e.g., SNAH-MOF, SNAH-metal nanoparticle systems) could enable high-performance theranostic platforms with amplified sensing and therapeutic functions. A particularly important direction is the integration of SNAHs with microfluidic systems, flexible electronics, and wearable platforms. Microfluidics can provide precise sample manipulation and automated cascaded analysis, while flexible or epidermal electronics allow for continuous, on-body sensing with real-time feedback. Furthermore, embedding SNAHs in microneedle patches, strain-responsive hydrogel circuits, or self-powered sensing devices may enable next-generation personalized health monitoring with closed-loop intervention capability.
  • Enhancement of matrix stability, device standardization, and pathways toward scalable industrial translation. Prior to the translation of SNAH-based biosensors into practical or commercial applications, several foundational challenges must be effectively addressed. These include nonspecific adsorption, susceptibility to nucleases, mechanical fragility, and environmental interference—all of which directly affect device reproducibility and lifespan. Therefore, priority should be given to chemical modification (e.g., backbone stabilization, protective coatings, zwitterionic surfaces), mechanical reinforcement, and stabilization strategies validated in the current literature. To enable cross-laboratory reproducibility, standardized fabrication protocols, quality-control metrics, and benchmark testing systems should be established. Moreover, coupling SNAHs with low-cost mass-production techniques such as microfluidic extrusion, injection molding, or 3D printing represents an important pathway toward industrialization.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF0607900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32372437, 32402223), Beijing Innovation Consortium of Agriculture Research System (BAIC01), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023M743796, 2025T180822).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

3Dthree-dimensional
AFM1aflatoxin M1
AFPalpha-fetoprotein
AFsaflatoxins
AgNCssilver nanoclusters
AMPsantimicrobial peptides
APCantigen-presenting cell
APSammonium persulfate
ATPadenosine triphosphate
AuNPsgold nanoparticles
AuNRsgold nanorods
CAPchloramphenicol
cDNAcomplementary DNA
CORcoralyne
CTLA-4cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4
DGTdiffusive gradients
DOXdoxorubicin
EDC/NHS1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide/N-Hydroxysuccinimide
ELISAenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
EpCAMepithelial cell adhesion molecule
FB1fumonisin B1
FLD-MSfluorescence detection–mass spectrometry
GCgas chromatography
HPLChigh-performance liquid chromatography
HRCAhyperbranched rolling circle amplification
HRPhorseradish peroxidase
ITOIndium-tin oxide
LCliquid chromatography
LCSTlower critical solution temperature
LODlimit of detection
LPSlipopolysaccharides
MAFmalathion aptamer
MBAAmmethylene bis(acrylamide)
MB-Doxdoxorubicin-methylene blue conjugates
MC-LRMicrocystin-LR
MELmelamine
microRNAmiRNA
MIPsmolecular imprinted polymers
MNAzymesmulticomponent nucleic acid enzymes
MNPsmagnetic nanoparticles
MOFsmetal–organic frameworks
MUC1mucin 1 protein
NFCnear-field communication
NIRnear-infrared
nMnanomolar
OTAochratoxin A
PCRpolymerase chain reaction
PD-1cell death protein 1
pMpicomolar
pNIPAMpoly(N-isopropylacrylamide)
QDquantum dots
RACractopamine
RCArolling circle amplification
RhBrhodamine B
ROSreactive oxygen species
SELEXSystematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment
SEMscanning electron microscopy
SERSsurface-enhanced Raman scattering
SNAHssmart nucleic acid hydrogels
SPRsurface plasmon resonance
ssDNAsingle-stranded DNA
T cellT lymphocytes
TBOtoluidine blue O
TEMEDN,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine
tFNAstetrahedral framework nucleic acids
TGMSTriglycerol monostearate
TMB3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine
TNF-αtumor necrosis factor-α
UO22+uranyl ion
V.P.Vibrio parahaemolyticus
ZENzearalenone
μMmicromolar

References

  1. Gao, X.; Bayinqiaoge, B.; Li, M.; Chandrawati, R.; Li, X.; Sun, L.; Wang, C.H.; Zhang, C.; Tang, S.-Y. Stimuli-Responsive Smart Materials Enabled High-Performance Biosensors for Liquid Biopsies. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2025, 23, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xia, X.; Yang, H.; Cao, J.; Zhang, J.; He, Q.; Deng, R. Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification for Food Safety Analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2022, 153, 116641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Pan, H.; Ma, X.; Jiang, L.; Zhu, Q.; Wu, H.; Wang, Z. Development and Preliminary Application of a Triplex Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assay for the Simultaneous Detection of Entamoeba Histolytica, Giardia Lamblia, and Cryptosporidium Parvum. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 888529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xia, X.; He, Q.; Dong, Y.; Deng, R.; Li, J. Aptamer-Based Homogeneous Analysis for Food Control. Curr. Anal. Chem. 2020, 16, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Chen, K.; Li, X.; Xu, W. Smart Nucleic Acid Hydrogels with High Stimuli-Responsiveness in Biomedical Fields. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yao, C.; Zhang, R.; Tang, J.; Yang, D. Rolling Circle Amplification (RCA)-Based DNA Hydrogel. Nat. Protoc. 2021, 16, 5460–5483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Žuržul, N.; Stokke, B.T. DNA Aptamer Functionalized Hydrogels for Interferometric Fiber-Optic Based Continuous Monitoring of Potassium Ions. Biosensors 2021, 11, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lim, S.; Kuang, Y.; Ardoña, H.A.M. Evolution of Supramolecular Systems towards Next-Generation Biosensors. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 723111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Xi, L.; Shang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Wu, Q.; Shen, Y.; Ding, Y. Programmable DNA Hydrogels for Biosensing and Point-of-Care Test. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 518, 216084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, L.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, C.; Ni, K.; Hu, B.; Cao, J.; Xu, W. Programmable and Multifunctional Nucleic Acid Hydrogels for Accelerating Chronic Wound Healing. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 520, 166107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Röthlisberger, P.; Hollenstein, M. Aptamer Chemistry. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2018, 134, 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  12. McConnell, E.M.; Cozma, I.; Mou, Q.; Brennan, J.D.; Lu, Y.; Li, Y. Biosensing with DNAzymes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 8954–8994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Trier, N.; Hansen, P.; Houen, G. Peptides, Antibodies, Peptide Antibodies and More. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, Y.; Pan, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, M.; Deng, S.; Xia, Z. A SPE Method with Two MIPs in Two Steps for Improving the Selectivity of MIPs. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 8436–8442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mahinroosta, M.; Jomeh Farsangi, Z.; Allahverdi, A.; Shakoori, Z. Hydrogels as Intelligent Materials: A Brief Review of Synthesis, Properties and Applications. Mater. Today Chem. 2018, 8, 42–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, F.; Tang, J.; Geng, J.; Luo, D.; Yang, D. Polymeric DNA Hydrogel: Design, Synthesis and Applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 98, 101163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kulkarni, M.B.; Ayachit, N.H.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Biosensors and Microfluidic Biosensors: From Fabrication to Application. Biosensors 2022, 12, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McConnell, E.M.; Nguyen, J.; Li, Y. Aptamer-Based Biosensors for Environmental Monitoring. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kotsiri, Z.; Vidic, J.; Vantarakis, A. Applications of Biosensors for Bacteria and Virus Detection in Food and Water–a Systematic Review. J. Environ. Sci. 2022, 111, 367–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Justino, C.I.L.; Duarte, A.C.; Rocha-Santos, T.A.P. Critical Overview on the Application of Sensors and Biosensors for Clinical Analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 85, 36–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, J.; Mo, L.; Lu, C.-H.; Fu, T.; Yang, H.-H.; Tan, W. Functional Nucleic Acid-Based Hydrogels for Bioanalytical and Biomedical Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 1410–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marrazza, G. Aptamer Sensors. Biosensors 2017, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wen, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. Aptamers in Drug Delivery Development. Mater. Today 2025, 88, 855–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, J.; Huo, J.; Huang, H.; Yao, C.; Yang, D. Construction of Nucleic Acid Aptamer-Functionalized DNA Hydrogels and Their Application in Biomedicine. Mater. Today 2025, 88, 552–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yao, C.; Tang, H.; Wu, W.; Tang, J.; Guo, W.; Luo, D.; Yang, D. Double Rolling Circle Amplification Generates Physically Cross-Linked DNA Network for Stem Cell Fishing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 3422–3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Um, S.H.; Lee, J.B.; Park, N.; Kwon, S.Y.; Umbach, C.C.; Luo, D. Enzyme-Catalysed Assembly of DNA Hydrogel. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 797–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chang, Y.; Zheng, W.; Duan, M.; Su, T.; Wang, Z.; Wu, S.; Duan, N. Construction of Aptamer-Functionalized DNA Hydrogels for Effective Inhibition of Shiga Toxin II Toxicity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 23533–23543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, W.; Chen, Y.-R.; Wu, J.; Lv, J.; Chen, Y.; Lin, M.; Liu, R.; Yin, H.; Wu, Z.-S. Programmable DNA Dendrimer from a Single Symmetric Y-Shaped Structural Unit for Targeted Tumor Therapy with One Hundred Inhibition Efficiency. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2421245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ahn, S.Y.; Kim, J.; Vellampatti, S.; Oh, S.; Lim, Y.T.; Park, S.H.; Luo, D.; Chung, J.; Um, S.H. Protein-Encoding Free-Standing RNA Hydrogel for Sub-Compartmentalized Translation. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2110424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, Z.; Kangovi, G.N.; Wen, W.; Lee, S.; Niu, L. An RNA Aptamer Capable of Forming a Hydrogel by Self-Assembly. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18, 2056–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, R.; Lv, Z.; Chang, L.; Wang, J.; Tang, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, S.; Guo, J.; Yao, C.; Yang, D. A Responsive DNA Hydrogel Containing Poly-Aptamers as Dual-Target Inhibitors for Localized Cancer Immunotherapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2401563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mao, X.; Simon, A.J.; Pei, H.; Shi, J.; Li, J.; Huang, Q.; Plaxco, K.W.; Fan, C. Activity Modulation and Allosteric Control of a Scaffolded DNAzyme Using a Dynamic DNA Nanostructure. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 1200–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Tian, J.; Zhu, L.; Ma, X.; He, X.; Huang, K.; Ren, F.; Xu, W. Smart and Functionalized Development of Nucleic Acid-Based Hydrogels: Assembly Strategies, Recent Advances, and Challenges. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2100216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, Z.; Fan, H.; Satyavolu, N.S.R.; Wang, W.; Lake, R.; Jiang, J.-H.; Lu, Y. Imaging Endogenous Metal Ions in Living Cells Using a DNAzyme–Catalytic Hairpin Assembly Probe. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 8721–8725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Khajouei, S.; Ravan, H.; Ebrahimi, A. DNA Hydrogel-Empowered Biosensing. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 275, 102060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mao, X.; Mao, D.; Chen, T.; Jalalah, M.; Al-Assiri, M.S.; Harraz, F.A.; Zhu, X.; Li, G. DNA Hydrogel-Based Three-Dimensional Electron Transporter and Its Application in Electrochemical Biosensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 36851–36859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mao, X.; Pan, S.; Zhou, D.; He, X.; Zhang, Y. Fabrication of DNAzyme-Functionalized Hydrogel and Its Application for Visible Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 285, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jiang, C.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Chen, D.; Wen, Y. A Portable Visual Capillary Sensor Based on Functional DNA Crosslinked Hydrogel for Point-of-Care Detection of Lead Ion. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 307, 127625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chai, H.; Yan, C.; Guo, J.; Lei, F.; Miao, P. Electrochemical Analysis of Ca2+ Based on DNAzyme Catalyzed Degradation of DNA Hydrogel. Electrochem. Commun. 2024, 165, 107755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hou, M.; Yin, X.; Jiang, J.; He, J. DNAzyme-Triggered Sol–Gel–Sol Transition of a Hydrogel Allows Target Cell Enrichment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 15031–15039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xiang, B.; He, K.; Zhu, R.; Liu, Z.; Zeng, S.; Huang, Y.; Nie, Z.; Yao, S. Self-Assembled DNA Hydrogel Based on Enzymatically Polymerized DNA for Protein Encapsulation and Enzyme/DNAzyme Hybrid Cascade Reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 22801–22807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, T.; Wang, X.; Luo, S.; Zhang, P.; Li, N.; Chen, C.; Li, J.; Shi, H.; Dong, H.; Huang, R.-P. Constructions, Purifications and Applications of DNA-Antibody Conjugates: A Review. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 47951–47963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Keller, A.; Linko, V. Challenges and Perspectives of DNA Nanostructures in Biomedicine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 15818–15833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wei, Y.; Wang, K.; Luo, S.; Li, F.; Zuo, X.; Fan, C.; Li, Q. Programmable DNA Hydrogels as Artificial Extracellular Matrix. Small 2022, 18, 2107640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhu, Y.; Shi, R.; Lu, W.; Shi, S.; Chen, Y. Framework Nucleic Acids as Promising Reactive Oxygen Species Scavengers for Anti-Inflammatory Therapy. Nanoscale 2024, 16, 7363–7377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dovgan, I.; Koniev, O.; Kolodych, S.; Wagner, A. Antibody–Oligonucleotide Conjugates as Therapeutic, Imaging, and Detection Agents. Bioconjugate Chem. 2019, 30, 2483–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dugal-Tessier, J.; Thirumalairajan, S.; Jain, N. Antibody-Oligonucleotide Conjugates: A Twist to Antibody-Drug Conjugates. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Watson, E.E.; Winssinger, N. Synthesis of Protein-Oligonucleotide Conjugates. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Z.; Li, S.; Chen, N.; Yang, C.; Wang, Y. Programmable Display of DNA–Protein Chimeras for Controlling Cell–Hydrogel Interactions via Reversible Intermolecular Hybridization. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 1174–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Peng, L.; Li, W.; Peng, G.; Wei, D.; Gou, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, X.; Wu, L.; Zhang, W.; et al. Antibacterial and DNA-Based Hydrogels In Situ Block TNF-α to Promote Diabetic Alveolar Bone Rebuilding. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2024, 45, 2300559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bourdon, L.; Cochard, A.; Tauran, Y.; Sugitani, Y.; Sato, Y.; Takinoue, M.; Fujita, H.; Fujii, T.; Kim, S.H.; Genot, A.J. Antibody-Functionalized DNA Hydrogels Recognize and Isolate Living Tumor Cells. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2025, e00619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Adhikari, S.; Ghosh, S.; Sarathi Addy, P. Advancing Biomarker Detection with Peptide-Integrated Fluorescent Probes. Chem.-Asian J. 2025, 20, e00211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hoyos-Nogués, M.; Gil, F.J.; Mas-Moruno, C. Antimicrobial Peptides: Powerful Biorecognition Elements to Detect Bacteria in Biosensing Technologies. Molecules 2018, 23, 1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, X.; Marrakchi, M.; Xu, D.; Dong, H.; Andreescu, S. Biosensors Based on Modularly Designed Synthetic Peptides for Recognition, Detection and Live/Dead Differentiation of Pathogenic Bacteria. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 80, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ahn, S.; Kim, N.; Choi, Y.; Kim, J.; Hwang, H.; Kim, C.; Lee, H.-Y.; Kim, S.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, H.H.; et al. Peptide-Decorated Microneedles for the Detection of Microplastics. Biosensors 2024, 14, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, M.; Song, Z.; Yang, X.; Song, Z.; Luo, X. Antifouling Peptides Combined with Recognizing DNA Probes for Ultralow Fouling Electrochemical Detection of Cancer Biomarkers in Human Bodily Fluids. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 206, 114162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. He, X.; Sun, N.; Jia, H.; Hou, M.; Tan, Z.; Lu, X. Antifouling Electrochemical Biosensor Based on Conductive Hydrogel of DNA Scaffold for Ultrasensitive Detection of ATP. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 40624–40632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, C.; Chen, P.; Shao, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Li, Z.; Weil, T.; Liu, D. A Writable Polypeptide–DNA Hydrogel with Rationally Designed Multi-modification Sites. Small 2015, 11, 1138–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wei, Z.; Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Han, Z.; Li, Y.; Gan, L.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, F.; Ye, X.; et al. Programmable DNA-Peptide Conjugated Hydrogel via Click Chemistry for Sequential Modulation of Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2419915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Huang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, M.; Wang, F.; Qin, J.; Ye, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, C.; Hong, J. A Nucleic Acid-Based LYTAC plus Platform to Simultaneously Mediate Disease-Driven Protein Downregulation. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2306248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yin, W.; Chen, X.; Bai, L.; Li, Y.; Chen, W.; Jiang, Y.; He, Y.; Yang, Y.; Lin, Y.; Tian, T.; et al. BBPs-Functionalized Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid Hydrogel Scaffold Captures Endogenous BMP-2 to Promote Bone Regeneration. Biomaterials 2025, 319, 123194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Obuobi, S.; Tay, H.K.-L.; Tram, N.D.T.; Selvarajan, V.; Khara, J.S.; Wang, Y.; Ee, P.L.R. Facile and Efficient Encapsulation of Antimicrobial Peptides via Crosslinked DNA Nanostructures and Their Application in Wound Therapy. J. Control. Release 2019, 313, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. BelBruno, J.J. Molecularly Imprinted Polymers. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 94–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Haupt, K.; Medina Rangel, P.X.; Bui, B.T.S. Molecularly Imprinted Polymers: Antibody Mimics for Bioimaging and Therapy. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 9554–9582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ogiso, M.; Minoura, N.; Shinbo, T.; Shimizu, T. Detection of a Specific DNA Sequence by Electrophoresis through a Molecularly Imprinted Polymer. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 4177–4182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Byrne, M.E.; Salian, V. Molecular Imprinting within Hydrogels II: Progress and Analysis of the Field. Int. J. Pharm. 2008, 364, 188–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Xie, B.; Lyu, Y.; Liu, Z. Recent Advances of Molecular Imprinting Technology for the Separation and Recognition of Complex Biological Sample Systems. Chin. J. Chromatogr. 2024, 42, 508–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lusina, A.; Cegłowski, M. Molecularly Imprinted Polymers as State-of-the-Art Drug Carriers in Hydrogel Transdermal Drug Delivery Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, Z.; Liu, J. Molecular Imprinting with Functional DNA. Small 2019, 15, 1805246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, B.; Liu, J. Incorporation of Boronic Acid into Aptamer-Based Molecularly Imprinted Hydrogels for Highly Specific Recognition of Adenosine. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 2568–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, Z.; Liu, J. Molecularly Imprinted Polymers with DNA Aptamer Fragments as Macromonomers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 6371–6378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Song, M.; Zhang, J.; Shen, K.; Hu, Y.; Shen, W.; Tang, S.; Lee, H.K. Application of Smart-Responsive Hydrogels in Nucleic Acid and Nucleic Acid-Based Target Sensing: A Review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2025, 267, 116803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shahbazi, M.-A.; Bauleth-Ramos, T.; Santos, H.A. DNA Hydrogel Assemblies: Bridging Synthesis Principles to Biomedical Applications. Adv. Ther. 2018, 1, 1800042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Uzumcu, A.T.; Guney, O.; Okay, O. Nanocomposite DNA Hydrogels with Temperature Sensitivity. Polymer 2016, 100, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chen, J.; Ouyang, X.; Yu, C.; Xiang, J. Functionalized pNIPAM-DNA Hydrogel Colorimetric Platform for Visual Detection of Low-Mass Soluble β-Amyloid Oligomers. Anal. Chem. 2025, 97, 10417–10423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Yata, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Tan, M.; Nakatsuji, H.; Ohtsuki, S.; Murakami, T.; Imahori, H.; Umeki, Y.; Shiomi, T.; Takakura, Y.; et al. DNA Nanotechnology-Based Composite-Type Gold Nanoparticle-Immunostimulatory DNA Hydrogel for Tumor Photothermal Immunotherapy. Biomaterials 2017, 146, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Chang, G.; Wang, Y.; Gong, B.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, S.; Huang, F.; Shen, Y.; Xie, A. Reduced Graphene Oxide/Amaranth Extract/AuNPs Composite Hydrogel on Tumor Cells as Integrated Platform for Localized and Multiple Synergistic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 11246–11256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, C.; Liu, X.; Wulf, V.; Vázquez-González, M.; Fadeev, M.; Willner, I. DNA-Based Hydrogels Loaded with Au Nanoparticles or Au Nanorods: Thermoresponsive Plasmonic Matrices for Shape-Memory, Self-Healing, Controlled Release, and Mechanical Applications. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 3424–3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Liu, F.; Zhang, X.; Huang, J.; Wang, G. Programmable Plasmonic Hydrogel Thermometers Actuated by DNA Breathing. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2024, 9, 2400243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lu, S.; Shen, J.; Fan, C.; Li, Q.; Yang, X. DNA Assembly-Based Stimuli-Responsive Systems. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2100328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Stricker, L.; Fritz, E.-C.; Peterlechner, M.; Doltsinis, N.L.; Ravoo, B.J. Arylazopyrazoles as Light-Responsive Molecular Switches in Cyclodextrin-Based Supramolecular Systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 4547–4554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cangialosi, A.; Yoon, C.; Liu, J.; Huang, Q.; Guo, J.; Nguyen, T.D.; Gracias, D.H.; Schulman, R. DNA Sequence–Directed Shape Change of Photopatterned Hydrogels via High-Degree Swelling. Science 2017, 357, 1126–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Peng, L.; You, M.; Yuan, Q.; Wu, C.; Han, D.; Chen, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Xue, J.; Tan, W. Macroscopic Volume Change of Dynamic Hydrogels Induced by Reversible DNA Hybridization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 12302–12307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yang, M.; Dong, Y.; Li, C. Light-Dissipative and Reprogrammable DNA Hydrogels Enabled by Merocyanine Photoacids. Chem. Mater. 2023, 35, 9978–9987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Fadeev, M.; Li, Z.; Wulf, V.; Tian, H.; Willner, I. Chemical and Photochemical DNA “Gears” Reversibly Control Stiffness, Shape-Memory, Self-Healing and Controlled Release Properties of Polyacrylamide Hydrogels. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 1008–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zhou, L.; Pi, W.; Cheng, S.; Gu, Z.; Zhang, K.; Min, T.; Zhang, W.; Du, H.; Zhang, P.; Wen, Y. Multifunctional DNA Hydrogels with Hydrocolloid-Cotton Structure for Regeneration of Diabetic Infectious Wounds. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2106167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pandey, P.K.; Ulla, H.; Satyanarayan, M.N.; Rawat, K.; Gaur, A.; Gawali, S.; Hassan, P.A.; Bohidar, H.B. Fluorescent MoS2 Quantum Dot–DNA Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, D.; Liu, J.; Duan, J.; Yi, H.; Liu, J.; Song, H.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, J.; Zhang, K. Enrichment and Sensing Tumor Cells by Embedded Immunomodulatory DNA Hydrogel to Inhibit Postoperative Tumor Recurrence. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liu, B.; Sun, J.; Zhu, J.; Li, B.; Ma, C.; Gu, X.; Liu, K.; Zhang, H.; Wang, F.; Su, J.; et al. Injectable and NIR-Responsive DNA–Inorganic Hybrid Hydrogels with Outstanding Photothermal Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2004460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Liu, X.; Zhang, M.; Chen, Z.; Cui, J.; Yang, L.; Lu, Z.; Qi, F.; Wang, H. Photothermal Detection of MicroRNA Using a Horseradish Peroxidase-Encapsulated DNA Hydrogel with a Portable Thermometer. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 799370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, C.; Cheng, Y. Magnetic-Responsive Hydrogels: From Strategic Design to Biomedical Applications. J. Control. Release 2021, 335, 541–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Shi, J.; Shi, Z.; Dong, Y.; Wu, F.; Liu, D. Responsive DNA-Based Supramolecular Hydrogels. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 2827–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Song, J.; He, W.; Shen, H.; Zhou, Z.; Li, M.; Su, P.; Yang, Y. Self-Assembly of a Magnetic DNA Hydrogel as a New Biomaterial for Enzyme Encapsulation with Enhanced Activity and Stability. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 2449–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Suhail, M.; Alamgir; Wahab, A.; Eggers, T.; Ahmad, Z.; Shehzad, K.; Iqbal, M.Z. Magnetically Responsive Hydrogel Systems: Fundamental Features, Emerging Applications, and Future Horizons. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2025, 543, 216916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ma, X.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Shao, Y.; Jia, H.; Cao, T.; Wang, R.; Liu, D. Remote Controlling DNA Hydrogel by Magnetic Field. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 1995–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tang, J.; Yao, C.; Gu, Z.; Jung, S.; Luo, D.; Yang, D. Super-Soft and Super-Elastic DNA Robot with Magnetically Driven Navigational Locomotion for Cell Delivery in Confined Space. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 2490–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yao, C.; Yuan, Y.; Yang, D. Magnetic DNA Nanogels for Targeting Delivery and Multistimuli-Triggered Release of Anticancer Drugs. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2018, 1, 2012–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, D.; Duan, J.; Liu, J.; Yi, H.; Zhang, Z.; Song, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, K. Stimuli-Responsive Self-Degradable DNA Hydrogels: Design, Synthesis, and Applications. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2023, 12, 2203031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Wang, Z.; Chen, R.; Yang, S.; Li, S.; Gao, Z. Design and Application of Stimuli-Responsive DNA Hydrogels: A Review. Mater. Today Bio. 2022, 16, 100430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Day, H.A.; Pavlou, P.; Waller, Z.A.E. I-Motif DNA: Structure, Stability and Targeting with Ligands. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 4407–4418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Huang, Z.; Liu, B.; Liu, J. Parallel Polyadenine Duplex Formation at Low pH Facilitates DNA Conjugation onto Gold Nanoparticles. Langmuir 2016, 32, 11986–11992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Hu, Y.; Gao, S.; Lu, H.; Ying, J.Y. Acid-Resistant and Physiological pH-Responsive DNA Hydrogel Composed of a-Motif and i-Motif toward Oral Insulin Delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 5461–5470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Hu, Y.; Lu, C.-H.; Guo, W.; Aleman-Garcia, M.A.; Ren, J.; Willner, I. A Shape Memory Acrylamide/DNA Hydrogel Exhibiting Switchable Dual pH-Responsiveness. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 6867–6874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ren, J.; Hu, Y.; Lu, C.-H.; Guo, W.; Aleman-Garcia, M.A.; Ricci, F.; Willner, I. pH-Responsive and Switchable Triplex-Based DNA Hydrogels. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 4190–4195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Lee, S.R.; Ong, C.Y.J.; Wong, J.Y.; Ke, Y.; Lim, J.Y.C.; Dong, Z.; Long, Y.; Hu, Y. Programming the Assembly of Oligo-Adenine with Coralyne into a pH-Responsive DNA Hydrogel. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 15394–15404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, X.; Chen, C.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Qiao, X.; Xu, Z. Ultra-Sensitive Detection of Streptomycin in Foods Using a Novel SERS Switch Sensor Fabricated by AuNRs Array and DNA Hydrogel Embedded with DNAzyme. Food Chem. 2022, 393, 133413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Pi, K.; Liu, J.; Van Cappellen, P. A DNA-Based Biosensor for Aqueous Hg(II): Performance under Variable pH, Temperature and Competing Ligand Composition. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 385, 121572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yoshida, K.; Hayashi, T.; Takinoue, M.; Onoe, H. Repeatable Detection of Ag+ Ions Using a DNA Aptamer-Linked Hydrogel Biochemical Sensor Integrated with Microfluidic Heating System. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 9692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Cai, X.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, W.; Du, D.; Lin, Y. pH-Sensitive ZnO Quantum Dots–Doxorubicin Nanoparticles for Lung Cancer Targeted Drug Delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 22442–22450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cai, X.; Luo, Y.; Yan, H.; Du, D.; Lin, Y. pH-Responsive ZnO Nanocluster for Lung Cancer Chemotherapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 5739–5747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yao, S.; Xiang, L.; Wang, L.; Gong, H.; Chen, F.; Cai, C. pH-Responsive DNA Hydrogels with Ratiometric Fluorescence for Accurate Detection of miRNA-21. Anal. Chim. Acta 2022, 1207, 339795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Simmel, F.C.; Yurke, B.; Singh, H.R. Principles and Applications of Nucleic Acid Strand Displacement Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 6326–6369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Oishi, M.; Nakatani, K. Dynamically Programmed Switchable DNA Hydrogels Based on a DNA Circuit Mechanism. Small 2019, 15, 1900490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Lin, D.C.; Yurke, B.; Langrana, N.A. Mechanical Properties of a Reversible, DNA-Crosslinked Polyacrylamide Hydrogel. J. Biomech. Eng. 2004, 126, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ho, M.S.M.; Lim, A.Z.T.; Ke, Y.; Loh, W.W.; Zheng, X.T.; Yang, L.; Dong, Z.; Wang, F.; Lim, J.Y.C.; Hu, Y. Cascade DNA Structural Transitions Enable Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 27116–27125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhang, R.; Zhou, X.; Deng, H.; Yuan, R.; Yuan, Y. Efficient Multidriven Strand Displacement Reaction for Biosensing. Anal. Chem. 2024, 96, 16735–16742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Guo, B.; Wen, B.; Cheng, W.; Zhou, X.; Duan, X.; Zhao, M.; Xia, Q.; Ding, S. An Enzyme-Free and Label-Free Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor for Ultrasensitive Detection of Fusion Gene Based on DNA Self-Assembly Hydrogel with Streptavidin Encapsulation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 112, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. He, Y.; Yang, X.; Yuan, R.; Chai, Y. Switchable Target-Responsive 3D DNA Hydrogels As a Signal Amplification Strategy Combining with SERS Technique for Ultrasensitive Detection of miRNA 155. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 8538–8544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chang, W.-H.; Lee, Y.-F.; Liu, Y.-W.; Willner, I.; Liao, W.-C. Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogel Microcapsules for the Amplified Detection of microRNAs. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 16799–16808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Eguchi, Y.; Kato, T.; Tanaka, T.; Maruyama, T. A DNA–Gold Nanoparticle Hybrid Hydrogel Network Prepared by Enzymatic Reaction. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 5802–5805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhang, Z.; Liu, C.; Yang, C.; Wu, Y.; Yu, F.; Chen, Y.; Du, J. Aptamer-Patterned Hydrogel Films for Spatiotemporally Programmable Capture and Release of Multiple Proteins. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 8546–8554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. English, M.A.; Soenksen, L.R.; Gayet, R.V.; de Puig, H.; Angenent-Mari, N.M.; Mao, A.S.; Nguyen, P.Q.; Collins, J.J. Programmable CRISPR-Responsive Smart Materials. Science 2019, 365, 780–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Zhang, Z.; Du, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, J.; Yu, F.; Chen, Y. An Aptamer-Patterned Hydrogel for the Controlled Capture and Release of Proteins via Biorthogonal Click Chemistry and DNA Hybridization. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 5974–5982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. He, L.; Chen, C.; Liu, Y.; Hai, H.; Li, J. Ultrasensitive Detection of CA125 Based on a Triple Signal Amplification Strategy with a Huge Number of Loaded Probes via Exonuclease Cyclic Cleavage, Rolling Cyclic Amplification and Strand Self-Growth. Analyst 2023, 148, 3217–3225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Sun, K.; Chen, P.; Yan, S.; Yuan, W.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Dou, L.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Q.; et al. Ultrasensitive Nanopore Sensing of Mucin 1 and Circulating Tumor Cells in Whole Blood of Breast Cancer Patients by Analyte-Triggered Triplex-DNA Release. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 21030–21039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Ji, X.; Lv, H.; Sun, X.; Ding, C. Green-Emitting Carbon Dot Loaded Silica Nanoparticles Coated with DNA-Cross-Linked Hydrogels for Sensitive Carcinoembryonic Antigen Detection and Effective Targeted Cancer Therapy. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 15101–15104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wang, C.; Sun, W.; Wright, G.; Wang, A.Z.; Gu, Z. Inflammation-Triggered Cancer Immunotherapy by Programmed Delivery of CpG and Anti-PD1 Antibody. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 8912–8920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Gao, X.; Li, X.; Sun, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, F. DNA Tetrahedra-Cross-Linked Hydrogel Functionalized Paper for Onsite Analysis of DNA Methyltransferase Activity Using a Personal Glucose Meter. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 4592–4599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Gayet, R.V.; de Puig, H.; English, M.A.; Soenksen, L.R.; Nguyen, P.Q.; Mao, A.S.; Angenent-Mari, N.M.; Collins, J.J. Creating CRISPR-Responsive Smart Materials for Diagnostics and Programmable Cargo Release. Nat. Protoc. 2020, 15, 3030–3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhao, J.; Gao, J.; Xue, W.; Di, Z.; Xing, H.; Lu, Y.; Li, L. Upconversion Luminescence-Activated DNA Nanodevice for ATP Sensing in Living Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 578–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Luan, Y.; Wang, N.; Li, C.; Guo, X.; Lu, A. Advances in the Application of Aptamer Biosensors to the Detection of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Liu, D.; Jia, S.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Y.; Guan, Z.; Li, J.; Zhu, Z.; Ji, T.; Yang, C.J. Integrating Target-Responsive Hydrogel with Pressuremeter Readout Enables Simple, Sensitive, User-Friendly, Quantitative Point-of-Care Testing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 22252–22258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yan, C.; Hua, Y.; Guo, J.; Miao, P. Programmable DNA Hydrogels Construction with Functional Regulations for Biosensing Applications. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2024, 173, 117628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Chen, Q.; Tian, R.; Liu, G.; Wen, Y.; Bian, X.; Luan, D.; Wang, H.; Lai, K.; Yan, J. Fishing Unfunctionalized SERS Tags with DNA Hydrogel Network Generated by Ligation-Rolling Circle Amplification for Simple and Ultrasensitive Detection of Kanamycin. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 207, 114187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Hu, M.; Yue, F.; Dong, J.; Tao, C.; Bai, M.; Liu, M.; Zhai, S.; Chen, S.; Liu, W.; Qi, G.; et al. Screening of Broad-Spectrum Aptamer and Development of Electrochemical Aptasensor for Simultaneous Detection of Penicillin Antibiotics in Milk. Talanta 2024, 269, 125508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Sun, Z.; Han, L.; Yin, Y.; Mou, Y.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, W.; Chen, D.; Wu, Y.; Sun, X.; Guo, Y.; et al. Screening Broad-Spectrum Aptamers for Cephalosporin Antibiotics Using Real Samples and Development of a DNA Walker-Driven Dual-Mode Aptasensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2025, 280, 117446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Li, Y.; Ma, Y.; Jiao, X.; Li, T.; Lv, Z.; Yang, C.J.; Zhang, X.; Wen, Y. Control of Capillary Behavior through Target-Responsive Hydrogel Permeability Alteration for Sensitive Visual Quantitative Detection. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Liu, H.; Cao, T.; Xu, Y.; Dong, Y.; Liu, D. Tuning the Mechanical Properties of a DNA Hydrogel in Three Phases Based on ATP Aptamer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Xu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Lu, C. Self-Assembled ATP-Responsive DNA Nanohydrogel for Specifically Activated Fluorescence Imaging and Chemotherapy in Cancer Cells. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 10221–10226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Lim, J.Y.C.; Goh, S.S.; Loh, X.J. Bottom-up Engineering of Responsive Hydrogel Materials for Molecular Detection and Biosensing. ACS Mater. Lett. 2020, 2, 918–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Yu, J.; Xiao, S.; Yu, Z.; Hui, Y.; Li, T.; Wu, D.; Bi, W.; Gan, N.; Jia, Z. On-Site and Dual-Mode Detection of Live Vibrio Parahaemolyticus in Waters: A Universal Pathogen Sensing Platform Based on a Smart Hydrogel Aptasensor Imbedded with Gold Nanoclusters. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 366, 131947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Nam, J.; Jang, W.S.; Kim, J.; Lee, H.; Lim, C.S. Lamb Wave-Based Molecular Diagnosis Using DNA Hydrogel Formation by Rolling Circle Amplification (RCA) Process. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 142, 111496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Na, W.; Nam, D.; Lee, H.; Shin, S. Rapid Molecular Diagnosis of Infectious Viruses in Microfluidics Using DNA Hydrogel Formation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 108, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Kim, H.; Abbas, N.; Shin, S. A Rapid Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Using DNA Hydrogel Formation on Microfluidic Pores. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 177, 113005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Jiao, J.; Kang, Q.; Cui, S.; Cao, J.; Lin, T.; Ma, C.; Xiao, Z.; Du, T.; Wang, N.; Du, X.; et al. Target-Driven Functionalized DNA Hydrogel Capillary Sensor for SARS-CoV-2 Dual-Mode Detection. Talanta 2025, 285, 127342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zhao, C.; Liu, G.; Tan, Q.; Gao, M.; Chen, G.; Huang, X.; Xu, X.; Li, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Polysaccharide-Based Biopolymer Hydrogels for Heavy Metal Detection and Adsorption. J. Adv. Res. 2023, 44, 53–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Malik, L.A.; Bashir, A.; Qureashi, A.; Pandith, A.H. Detection and Removal of Heavy Metal Ions: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 1495–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Lambropoulou, D.A.; Albanis, T.A. Methods of Sample Preparation for Determination of Pesticide Residues in Food Matrices by Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry-Based Techniques: A Review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 389, 1663–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zhou, T.; Xiao, X.; Li, G. Microwave Accelerated Selective Soxhlet Extraction for the Determination of Organophosphorus and Carbamate Pesticides in Ginseng with Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 5816–5822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Yang, N.; You, D.; Wang, J.; Ge, L. Progress in DNA-Based Hydrogels for Biosensing. Mater. Technol. 2022, 37, 798–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ono, A.; Togashi, H. Highly Selective Oligonucleotide-Based Sensor for Mercury(II) in Aqueous Solutions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4300–4302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Dave, N.; Chan, M.Y.; Huang, P.-J.J.; Smith, B.D.; Liu, J. Regenerable DNA-Functionalized Hydrogels for Ultrasensitive, Instrument-Free Mercury(II) Detection and Removal in Water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12668–12673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Pi, K.; Liu, J.; Van Cappellen, P. Direct Measurement of Aqueous Mercury(II): Combining DNA-Based Sensing with Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 13680–13689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Chu, J.; Chen, C.; Li, X.; Yu, L.; Li, W.; Cheng, M.; Tang, W.; Xiong, Z. A Responsive Pure DNA Hydrogel for Label-Free Detection of Lead Ion. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1157, 338400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. He, X.; Zhou, X.; Liu, W.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X. Flexible DNA Hydrogel SERS Active Biofilms for Conformal Ultrasensitive Detection of Uranyl Ions from Aquatic Products. Langmuir 2020, 36, 2930–2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Liu, C.; Gou, S.; Bi, Y.; Gao, Q.; Sun, J.; Hu, S.; Guo, W. Smart DNA-Gold Nanoparticle Hybrid Hydrogel Film Based Portable, Cost-Effective and Storable Biosensing System for the Colorimetric Detection of Lead (II) and Uranyl Ions. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 210, 114290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Liu, Z.; Chen, R.; Wang, H.; Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Pang, W.; Ren, S.; Yang, J.; Yang, C.; et al. A Colorimetric/Electrochemical Microfluidic Biosensor Using Target-Triggered DNA Hydrogels for Organophosphorus Detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024, 263, 116558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Zandieh, M.; Luo, X.; Zhao, Y.; Feng, C.; Liu, J. Selection of Plastic-Binding DNA Aptamers for Microplastics Detection. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202421438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ren, K.; Ding, S.; Shi, J.; Dong, J.; Du, F.; Tang, Z. Detection of Lead Contamination Using DNAzyme and Split Activator-Triggered CRISPR/Cas12a. Talanta 2025, 295, 128385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. He, W.; Wu, Z.; Liu, X.; Xu, H.; Jian, X.; Zhou, K.; Du, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, D. MOF-Based Fluorescent Hydrogels for Rapid and Highly Selective Visual Detection of Heavy Metal Ions. Microchem. J. 2025, 217, 114962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Huang, Y.; Wu, X.; Tian, T.; Zhu, Z.; Lin, H.; Yang, C. Target-Responsive DNAzyme Hydrogel for Portable Colorimetric Detection of Lanthanide(III) Ions. Sci. China Chem. 2017, 60, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Li, L.; Zhang, M.; Chen, W. Gold Nanoparticle-Based Colorimetric and Electrochemical Sensors for the Detection of Illegal Food Additives. J. Food Drug Anal. 2020, 28, 642–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Lu, Y.; Xia, Y.; Liu, G.; Pan, M.; Li, M.; Lee, N.A.; Wang, S. A Review of Methods for Detecting Melamine in Food Samples. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2017, 47, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Chen, P.; Han, W.; Li, Y.; Gao, G.; Yang, H. Distance-Readout Paper-Based Microfluidic Chip with a DNA Hydrogel Valve for AFB1 Detection. Anal. Chem. 2025, 97, 5975–5981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Lin, X.; Yan, H.; Zhao, L.; Duan, N.; Wang, Z.; Wu, S. Hydrogel-Integrated Sensors for Food Safety and Quality Monitoring: Fabrication Strategies and Emerging Applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 6395–6414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Kahn, J.S.; Hu, Y.; Willner, I. Stimuli-Responsive DNA-Based Hydrogels: From Basic Principles to Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 680–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Charusalaipong, P.; Gordon, M.-J.; Cantlay, L.; De Souza, N.; Horgan, G.W.; Bates, R.; Gratz, S.W. Frequent Dietary Multi-Mycotoxin Exposure in UK Children and Its Association with Dietary Intake. Toxins 2024, 16, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Lin, J.; Deng, Y.; Lin, Y.; Luo, F.; Weng, Z.; Wang, J.; Lin, C.; Qiu, B.; Lin, Z. Advanced Dual-Signal Point-of-Care Testing Platform for Sensitive T-2 Toxin Detection: Integrating Copper-Based Conductive MOF with Target-Responsive DNA Hydrogel. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2025, 438, 137802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Sun, Y.; Qi, S.; Dong, X.; Qin, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z. Colorimetric Aptasensor Targeting Zearalenone Developed Based on the Hyaluronic Acid-DNA Hydrogel and Bimetallic MOFzyme. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 212, 114366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Sun, Y.; Qi, S.; Dong, X.; Qin, M.; Ding, N.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z. Colorimetric Aptasensor for Fumonisin B1 Detection Based on the DNA Tetrahedra-Functionalized Magnetic Beads and DNA Hydrogel-Coated Bimetallic MOFzyme. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 443, 130252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Hao, L.; Wang, W.; Shen, X.; Wang, S.; Li, Q.; An, F.; Wu, S. A Fluorescent DNA Hydrogel Aptasensor Based on the Self-Assembly of Rolling Circle Amplification Products for Sensitive Detection of Ochratoxin a. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Aran, G.C.; Bayraç, C. Simultaneous Dual-Sensing Platform Based on Aptamer-Functionalized DNA Hydrogels for Visual and Fluorescence Detection of Chloramphenicol and Aflatoxin M1. Bioconjugate Chem. 2023, 34, 922–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Wu, P.; Li, S.; Ye, X.; Ning, B.; Bai, J.; Peng, Y.; Li, L.; Han, T.; Zhou, H.; Gao, Z.; et al. Cu/Au/Pt Trimetallic Nanoparticles Coated with DNA Hydrogel as Target-Responsive and Signal-Amplification Material for Sensitive Detection of Microcystin-LR. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1134, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Mann, H.; Khan, S.; Prasad, A.; Bayat, F.; Gu, J.; Jackson, K.; Li, Y.; Hosseinidoust, Z.; Didar, T.F.; Filipe, C.D.M. Bacteriophage-Activated DNAzyme Hydrogels Combined with Machine Learning Enable Point-of-Use Colorimetric Detection of Escherichia Coli. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2411173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Wang, Z.; Chen, R.; Hou, Y.; Qin, Y.; Li, S.; Yang, S.; Gao, Z. DNA Hydrogels Combined with Microfluidic Chips for Melamine Detection. Anal. Chim. Acta 2022, 1228, 340312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Bian, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Li, G.; Liu, S.; Li, S.; Gao, Z.; Kang, W. Bimetallic Nanozymes Laden DNA Hydrogel for Ultrasensitive Optical Detection of Ractopamine. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 380, 133402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Chen, Y.; Qian, S.; Yu, X.; Wu, J.; Xu, J. Microfluidics: The Propellant of CRISPR-Based Nucleic Acid Detection. Trends Biotechnol. 2023, 41, 557–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Li, H.; Wu, Y.; Nunekpeku, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Sheng, W.; Wang, Y. On-Site AFB1 Detection in Food via Dual-Equipped NH2-ZIF-8@Cu2+ and Core-Shell UCNPs Embedded in SA-PAM Hydrogel. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2025, 445, 138594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Hu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wang, L.; Gu, J.; Zuo, Y.; Zhao, L.; Lu, W.; Yu, Y. A Liposome-Based Aptasensor Integrated with Competitive Reaction Enabling Portable and Electrochemical Detection of Aβ Oligomer. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 225, 115108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Cheng, C.; Ganguly, S.; Li, P.; Tang, X. Detecting Hypoxia through the Non-Invasive and Simultaneous Monitoring of Sweat Lactate and Tissue Oxygenation. Biosensors 2024, 14, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Lee, M.; Lee, M.; Kim, S.; Park, N. Stimuli-Responsive DNA Hydrogel Design Strategies for Biomedical Applications. Biosensors 2025, 15, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Yamamoto, K.; Imamura, H.; Matsuyama, Y.; Kume, Y.; Ikeda, H.; Norman, G.L.; Shums, Z.; Aoki, T.; Hasegawa, K.; Beck, Y.; et al. AFP, AFP-L3, DCP, and GP73 as Markers for Monitoring Treatment Response and Recurrence and as Surrogate Markers of Clinicopathological Variables of HCC. J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 45, 1272–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Wang, Q.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, N.; Wang, J.; Yu, M.; Zhuang, X. Preparation of Aptamer Responsive DNA Functionalized Hydrogels for the Sensitive Detection of α-Fetoprotein Using SERS Method. Bioconjugate Chem. 2020, 31, 813–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Borum, R.M.; Moore, C.; Mantri, Y.; Xu, M.; Jokerst, J.V. Supramolecular Loading of DNA Hydrogels with Dye–Drug Conjugates for Real-Time Photoacoustic Monitoring of Chemotherapy. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2204330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Si, Y.; Xu, L.; Wang, N.; Zheng, J.; Yang, R.; Li, J. Target MicroRNA-Responsive DNA Hydrogel-Based Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Sensor Arrays for MicroRNA-Marked Cancer Screening. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 2649–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Perala, R.S.; Chandrasekar, N.; Balaji, R.; Alexander, P.S.; Humaidi, N.Z.N.; Hwang, M.T. Corrigendum to “a Comprehensive Review on Graphene-Based Materials: From Synthesis to Contemporary Sensor Applications” [Mater. Sci. Eng. R 159 (2024) 100805]. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2024, 160, 100816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Xu, L.; Wang, R.; Kelso, L.C.; Ying, Y.; Li, Y. A Target-Responsive and Size-Dependent Hydrogel Aptasensor Embedded with QD Fluorescent Reporters for Rapid Detection of Avian Influenza Virus H5N1. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 234, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Sun, X.; Ding, C.; Qin, M.; Li, J. Hydrogel-Based Biosensors for Bacterial Infections. Small 2024, 20, 2306960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Li, X.; Lu, Y.; Hu, Y. A Wireless and Battery-Free DNA Hydrogel Biosensor for Wound Infection Monitoring. Matter 2022, 5, 2473–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Li, S.; Dai, J.; Zhu, M.; Arroyo-Currás, N.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Lou, X.; Kippin, T.E.; Wang, S.; et al. Implantable Hydrogel-Protective DNA Aptamer-Based Sensor Supports Accurate, Continuous Electrochemical Analysis of Drugs at Multiple Sites in Living Rats. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 18525–18538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Hivare, P.; Gangrade, A.; Swarup, G.; Bhavsar, K.; Singh, A.; Gupta, R.; Thareja, P.; Gupta, S.; Bhatia, D. Peptide Functionalized DNA Hydrogel Enhances Neuroblastoma Cell Growth and Differentiation. Nanoscale 2022, 14, 8611–8620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Salimian, R.; Nardin, C. Conjugated Polymers for Aptasensing Applications. Biomacromolecules 2023, 24, 3411–3437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Ma, Y.; Mao, Y.; An, Y.; Tian, T.; Zhang, H.; Yan, J.; Zhu, Z.; Yang, C.J. Target-Responsive DNA Hydrogel for Non-Enzymatic and Visual Detection of Glucose. Analyst 2018, 143, 1679–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of nucleic acid hydrogel-based smart biosensors. Molecular recognition elements (aptamer, DNAzyme, peptide, antibody, MIP) interface with stimuli-responsive hydrogel matrices to transduce biochemical signals into detectable outputs, enabling applications in environmental monitoring, food safety, and disease diagnosis.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of nucleic acid hydrogel-based smart biosensors. Molecular recognition elements (aptamer, DNAzyme, peptide, antibody, MIP) interface with stimuli-responsive hydrogel matrices to transduce biochemical signals into detectable outputs, enabling applications in environmental monitoring, food safety, and disease diagnosis.
Biosensors 15 00799 g001
Figure 2. Design of aptamer as recognition element in SNAHs. (A). Illustration of preparation process of DNA hydrogel containing poly-aptamers [31]. (a) Synthesis of P-C gel-NP, where CTLA-4 (green) and PD-1 (red) aptamers are conjugated to DNA chains. (b) Fabrication of EcoR I@TGMS nanoparticles. (c) Mechanism of T-cell activation via checkpoint blockade: released aptamers disrupt the interactions between T cells and APCs/tumor cells. (B). Schematic illustration of the formation of Apt-hydrogel with two Y-shaped DNA scaffolds [27]. CTLA-4: cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4; PD-1: cell death protein 1; TGMS: Triglycerol monostearate; T cell: T lymphocytes; APC: antigen-presenting cell.
Figure 2. Design of aptamer as recognition element in SNAHs. (A). Illustration of preparation process of DNA hydrogel containing poly-aptamers [31]. (a) Synthesis of P-C gel-NP, where CTLA-4 (green) and PD-1 (red) aptamers are conjugated to DNA chains. (b) Fabrication of EcoR I@TGMS nanoparticles. (c) Mechanism of T-cell activation via checkpoint blockade: released aptamers disrupt the interactions between T cells and APCs/tumor cells. (B). Schematic illustration of the formation of Apt-hydrogel with two Y-shaped DNA scaffolds [27]. CTLA-4: cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4; PD-1: cell death protein 1; TGMS: Triglycerol monostearate; T cell: T lymphocytes; APC: antigen-presenting cell.
Biosensors 15 00799 g002
Figure 3. Design of DNAzyme as recognition element in SNAHs. (A). DNA hydrogel-based 3D electron transporter fabricated on ITO via HRCA, including three models: i (node-incorporated DNAzyme and TBO-dsDNA docking), ii (DNAzyme in electrolyte), and iii (DNAzyme encapsulated in hydrogel) [36]. (B). Self-assembled DNA hydrogel based on enzymatically polymerized DNA for protein encapsulation and implementation of enzyme/DNAzyme hybrid cascade reaction [41]. 3D: three-dimensional; ITO: Indium-tin oxide; HRCA: hyperbranched rolling circle amplification; TBO: toluidine blue O.
Figure 3. Design of DNAzyme as recognition element in SNAHs. (A). DNA hydrogel-based 3D electron transporter fabricated on ITO via HRCA, including three models: i (node-incorporated DNAzyme and TBO-dsDNA docking), ii (DNAzyme in electrolyte), and iii (DNAzyme encapsulated in hydrogel) [36]. (B). Self-assembled DNA hydrogel based on enzymatically polymerized DNA for protein encapsulation and implementation of enzyme/DNAzyme hybrid cascade reaction [41]. 3D: three-dimensional; ITO: Indium-tin oxide; HRCA: hyperbranched rolling circle amplification; TBO: toluidine blue O.
Biosensors 15 00799 g003
Figure 4. Design of antibodies as recognition element in SNAHs. (A). Antibacterial and DNA-based hydrogels in situ block TNF-α to promote diabetic alveolar bone rebuilding [50]. (a) Schematic diagram illustrating the assembly of Agantigel. (b) Photograph of agantigel in solution state (left) and gel state (right). (c) Rheological analysis of Agantigel. (d) SEM image of Agantigel. Scale bar: 100 µm. (e) Release kinetics of TNF-α antibody from Agantigel in vitro. (B). Use of DNA gel for capturing circulating tumor cells, with anti-EpCAM antibody as the recognition element (targeting EpCAM-expressing tumor cells, not EpCAM blood cells) [51]. (a) Labeling EpCAM+ cells with anti-EpCAM antibody and sticky-end DNA; (b) engulfing cells into DNA gel; (c) isolating via washing; (d) releasing via DNase I or specific DNA strand-mediated gel dissociation. TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha; SEM: scanning electron microscopy; EpCAM: epithelial cell adhesion molecule.
Figure 4. Design of antibodies as recognition element in SNAHs. (A). Antibacterial and DNA-based hydrogels in situ block TNF-α to promote diabetic alveolar bone rebuilding [50]. (a) Schematic diagram illustrating the assembly of Agantigel. (b) Photograph of agantigel in solution state (left) and gel state (right). (c) Rheological analysis of Agantigel. (d) SEM image of Agantigel. Scale bar: 100 µm. (e) Release kinetics of TNF-α antibody from Agantigel in vitro. (B). Use of DNA gel for capturing circulating tumor cells, with anti-EpCAM antibody as the recognition element (targeting EpCAM-expressing tumor cells, not EpCAM blood cells) [51]. (a) Labeling EpCAM+ cells with anti-EpCAM antibody and sticky-end DNA; (b) engulfing cells into DNA gel; (c) isolating via washing; (d) releasing via DNase I or specific DNA strand-mediated gel dissociation. TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha; SEM: scanning electron microscopy; EpCAM: epithelial cell adhesion molecule.
Biosensors 15 00799 g004
Figure 7. pH-/Ion-Responsive SNAHs. (A). Synthesis of the DNA chains capable of undergoing pH-stimulated hydrogel formation and dissociation [104]. (1): Acrydite nucleic acid. (2): Acrydite nucleic acid complementary to (1). (3): Linear copolymers formed by the copolymerization of acrylated nucleic acids (1) and acrylamide. (4): Linear copolymer formed by the copolymerization of acrylated nucleic acid (2) and acrylamide. (B). Assembly of oligoside adenine with coralyne to pH-responsive DNA hydrogel [105]. (a) COR induces the assembly of A-strand into antiparallel A-COR-A duplex at neutral pH, with dissociation triggered under acidic pH; (b) Acrydite-modified A-strands copolymerizes with acrylamide to form polyA, which self-assembles into A-COR-A DNA hydrogel at neutral pH. Under acidic conditions, COR release triggers hydrogel-to-liquid transition. COR: coralyne.
Figure 7. pH-/Ion-Responsive SNAHs. (A). Synthesis of the DNA chains capable of undergoing pH-stimulated hydrogel formation and dissociation [104]. (1): Acrydite nucleic acid. (2): Acrydite nucleic acid complementary to (1). (3): Linear copolymers formed by the copolymerization of acrylated nucleic acids (1) and acrylamide. (4): Linear copolymer formed by the copolymerization of acrylated nucleic acid (2) and acrylamide. (B). Assembly of oligoside adenine with coralyne to pH-responsive DNA hydrogel [105]. (a) COR induces the assembly of A-strand into antiparallel A-COR-A duplex at neutral pH, with dissociation triggered under acidic pH; (b) Acrydite-modified A-strands copolymerizes with acrylamide to form polyA, which self-assembles into A-COR-A DNA hydrogel at neutral pH. Under acidic conditions, COR release triggers hydrogel-to-liquid transition. COR: coralyne.
Biosensors 15 00799 g007
Figure 8. Small molecule-responsive SNAHs. (A). Schematic illustration of the working principle of the CSDR-Sensor [137]. The addition of cocaine molecules causes a certain degree of hydrogel degradation, which in turn alters the gel’s permeability in the capillary tube and regulates capillary action by modifying membrane permeability. (B). Self-assembled ATP-responsive DNA nanohydrogel for specifically activated fluorescence imaging and chemotherapy in cancer cells [139]. CSDR: capillary self-driven regulator sensor; ATP: adenosine triphosphate.
Figure 8. Small molecule-responsive SNAHs. (A). Schematic illustration of the working principle of the CSDR-Sensor [137]. The addition of cocaine molecules causes a certain degree of hydrogel degradation, which in turn alters the gel’s permeability in the capillary tube and regulates capillary action by modifying membrane permeability. (B). Self-assembled ATP-responsive DNA nanohydrogel for specifically activated fluorescence imaging and chemotherapy in cancer cells [139]. CSDR: capillary self-driven regulator sensor; ATP: adenosine triphosphate.
Biosensors 15 00799 g008
Table 1. Recognition elements and their key characteristics in SNAH.
Table 1. Recognition elements and their key characteristics in SNAH.
Recognition ElementPrincipleCharacteristics
AptamerSingle-stranded nucleic acids that fold into specific 3D conformations to bind targets via non-covalent interactions.High affinity and selectivity (nM–pM)
Chemical stability
Facile modification
Prone to nuclease degradation.
DNAzymesCatalytic DNA sequences capable of mediating substrate cleavage or redox reactions, typically dependent on specific metal ions.Catalytic and signal-amplifying
Metal-ion selective
Functions as a responsive crosslinker
Activity modulated by ions and environment
AntibodyProtein receptors recognizing antigens through epitope-paratope complementarity.Excellent affinity and biological relevance
High cost
Low stability under extreme pH/temperature
PeptidesShort amino acid chains interacting with targets via specific motifs or secondary structures.Biocompatible
Easily synthesized and modified
Lower affinity and selectivity (μM range)
MIPsSynthetic polymers with template-shaped cavities formed during polymerization.Resistant to harsh conditions
Scalable fabrication
Limited by incomplete template removal and heterogeneous sites
Table 2. Application of SNAHs in biosensors for environmental monitoring.
Table 2. Application of SNAHs in biosensors for environmental monitoring.
AnalyteRecognition ElementResponse MechanismSensor StrategyLODReference
Pb2+DNAzymeCleavage of substrate strand induces hydrogel collapse, releasing nucleotide fragments.Label-free pure DNA hydrogel biosensor7.7 nM[154]
Pb2+DNAzymeEnzyme-activated film degradation releases AuNPs for colorimetric readout.DNAzyme–AuNP colorimetric sensor2.6 nM[156]
Pb2+DNAzymeHydrogel mesh-size alteration modulates capillary flow velocity.Capillary-based flow rate sensor10 nM[38]
Hg2+T-rich DNA sequenceSpecific T–Hg2+–T coordination complex formation, generating a fluorescent signal.DNA-functionalized fluorescent hydrogel sensor0.05 nM[153]
UO22+DNAzymeFilm disintegration via enzymatic cleavage releases AuNPs for colorimetric detection.DNAzyme-mediated AuNP release-based colorimetric sensor10.3 nM[156]
UO22+DNAzymeHydrogel breakdown releases Raman reporters, which are captured and enhanced by Ag-NPs@PAN membrane for SERS.SERS-enhanced flexible hydrogel sensor0.838 pM[155]
Ln3+DNAzymeHydrogel collapse releases AuNPs, resulting in a color change.Colorimetric biosensor20 nM[161]
MalathionAptamerCompetitive binding disrupts hydrogel network, releasing AuNPs (colorimetric) and reducing Fc-labeled aptamer (electrochemical).Dual-mode colorimetric/electrochemical microfluidic chip sensor56 nM[157]
Table 3. Application of SNAHs in biosensors for food safety.
Table 3. Application of SNAHs in biosensors for food safety.
AnalyteRecognition ElementResponse MechanismSensor StrategyLODReference
T-2AptamerTarget-induced release of the nanozyme Cu3(HHTP)2 from a DNA hydrogel catalyzes TMB oxidation, enabling dual colorimetric and photothermal readoutDual-modal colorimetric and photothermal sensor1.67 ng/mL[168]
ZENAptamerZEN-aptamer binding triggers hydrogel disintegration, exposing encapsulated MOFzyme that catalyzes substrate reactionMOFzyme-based TMB colorimetric sensor0.8 pg/mL[169]
FB1AptamerFB1 binding releases DNA strands to initiate a displacement reaction, leading to hydrogel dissolution and MOFzyme releaseMOFzyme-based TMB colorimetric sensor0.38 pg/mL[170]
AFB1AptamerAFB1 binding enhances electrostatic repulsion between probes, disrupting FRET effect and turning on CSUCNPs fluorescenceTurn-on fluorescent biosensor0.08 μg/kg[178]
OTAAptamerOTA binding releases primers to initiate RCA, generating long fluorescent DNA chains for signal amplificationFluorescence signal-amplified biosensor0.01 ng/mL[171]
MC-LRAptamerHydrogel dissociation releases encapsulated Cu/Au/Pt trimetallic nanoparticles (TNs)Colorimetric sensor3.0 ng/L[173]
E. coliDNAzymeDNAzyme cleavage degrades hydrogel network, releasing AuNPs for colorimetric responseDNAzyme-mediated AuNP release-based colorimetric sensor101 CFU mL−1[174]
RACAptamerHydrogel collapse releases Au@Pd nanozymes that catalyze the H2O2-TMB reaction.Ultrasensitive optical colorimetric sensor7.39 ng/L[176]
MELAptamerHydrogel dissociation releases entrapped AuNPs.Colorimetric biosensor37 nM[175]
Table 4. Application of SNAHs in biosensors for disease diagnosis.
Table 4. Application of SNAHs in biosensors for disease diagnosis.
AnalyteRecognition ElementResponse MechanismSensor StrategyReference
S. aureus DNaseDNA hydrogelEnzymatic degradation of the hydrogel by DNase induces a change in dielectric propertiesNFC module integrated with a smartphone for wireless readout[189]
K+AptamerTarget binding induces a concentration-dependent de-swelling of the aptamer-functionalized hydrogelaptamer-hydrogel-based interferometric fiber sensor[4]
MB-DoxDNA-Crosslinked HydrogelHydrogel degradation in response to endogenous nuclease activity releases MB-Dox, enhancing the photoacoustic signalEnzyme-responsive disintegration of a DNA hydrogel matrix for turn-on photoacoustic imaging[184]
KanamycinAptamerA hydrogel-coated aptamer sensor generates an electrochemical signal upon binding while providing antifouling capabilityElectrochemical sensor based on a DNA aptamer with a protective hydrogel layer[190]
AFBAptamerDissociation of the hydrogel network releases pre-embedded IgG, facilitating the formation of a sandwich complex with SERS probes and functionalized magnetic beadsAptamer-responsive DNA hydrogel-based SERS biosensor[183]
miRNAMNAzymesMNAzyme cleaves crosslinking substrates within the DNA hydrogel, leading to hydrogel dissolution and activation of the SERS signalMNAzyme-responsive DNA hydrogel-based SERS biosensor[185]
VirusDNA templateAssembly of long DNA strands into a hydrogel network blocks the microfluidic pathways between beadsMicrofluidic chip-integrated DNA hydrogel sensor[143]
GlucoseAptamerTarget binding triggers the release of pre-encapsulated gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) from the hydrogelColorimetric biosensor based on an aptamer-functionalized hydrogel[193]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, L.; Zhu, L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, W.; He, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, W. Smart Nucleic Acid Hydrogel-Based Biosensors: From Molecular Recognition and Responsive Mechanisms to Applications. Biosensors 2025, 15, 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15120799

AMA Style

Xu L, Zhu L, Wang X, Zhang W, He X, Zhang Y, Xu W. Smart Nucleic Acid Hydrogel-Based Biosensors: From Molecular Recognition and Responsive Mechanisms to Applications. Biosensors. 2025; 15(12):799. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15120799

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Lu, Longjiao Zhu, Xiaoyu Wang, Wenqiang Zhang, Xiaoyun He, Yangzi Zhang, and Wentao Xu. 2025. "Smart Nucleic Acid Hydrogel-Based Biosensors: From Molecular Recognition and Responsive Mechanisms to Applications" Biosensors 15, no. 12: 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15120799

APA Style

Xu, L., Zhu, L., Wang, X., Zhang, W., He, X., Zhang, Y., & Xu, W. (2025). Smart Nucleic Acid Hydrogel-Based Biosensors: From Molecular Recognition and Responsive Mechanisms to Applications. Biosensors, 15(12), 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15120799

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop