Next Article in Journal
Pulsed Laser-Assisted Helium Ion Nanomachining of Monolayer Graphene—Direct-Write Kirigami Patterns
Next Article in Special Issue
Plasma Proteins at the Interface of Dental Implants Modulate Osteoblasts Focal Adhesions Expression and Cytoskeleton Organization
Previous Article in Journal
Low Reflection and Low Surface Recombination Rate Nano-Needle Texture Formed by Two-Step Etching for Solar Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Cytotoxicity and Release from Newly Formed PMMA–ZnO Nanocomposites Designed for Denture Bases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/nano9101393
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nanostructured Zirconia-Based Ceramics and Composites in Dentistry: A State-of-the-Art Review

by
Antonio Arena
1,*,
Francesca Prete
2,
Elisa Rambaldi
2,
Maria Chiara Bignozzi
2,3,
Carlo Monaco
1,
Adolfo Di Fiore
4 and
Jérôme Chevalier
5
1
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40125 Bologna, Italy
2
Centro Ceramico, 40138 Bologna, Italy
3
Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna, 40131 Bologna, Italy
4
Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, 35133 Padua, Italy
5
Materials Science Department, University of Lyon, INSA Lyon, CNRS UMR 5510 MATEIS, 69621 Villeurbanne, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(10), 1393; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101393
Submission received: 31 August 2019 / Revised: 18 September 2019 / Accepted: 25 September 2019 / Published: 29 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology in Dentistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The objective of this paper is to review the current knowledge on the development of nanostructured zirconia-based ceramics and composites suitable for application in dentistry. Isi Web of Science, Science Direct, Scientific.net databases, and Google were searched electronically for the period of 1980 to the present, matching the keywords “nano” with the keywords: “Zirconia, ZrO2, Y-TZP, and dental, dentistry”. A total of 74 papers were found, with the majority coming from Asia, indicating a more active scientific interest on the topic in this geographic area, followed by Europe, South America, and North America. The research shows, even though the scientific activity on nanostructured ceramics was intense in the last fifteen years, the development of fully dense zirconia-based nanoceramics is yet at an initial stage, most of all from the point of view of the clinical applications. It has been demonstrated that nanostructured ceramics can show improved properties because of the reduction of the grain size to the nanoscale. This is also true for zirconia-based nanoceramics, where some improvements in mechanical, optical, as well as resistance in low-temperature degradation have been observed. Potential applications of this class of material in the dental field are discussed, summarizing the results of the latest scientific research.

1. Introduction

In this review, a literature search was conducted on the databases Isi Web of Science, Science Direct, Scientific.net, and Google Scholar, for the period of 1980 to the present, matching the keyword “nano”, the keywords zirconia, ZrO2, Y-TZP, and the keywords dental and dentistry. A total of 74 papers that met these requirements were found.
For the purpose of this research, some preliminary considerations about the literature references and the definition of nanostructured materials need to be made. Following the definition proposed by Gleiter [1], nanostructured materials are solids composed of structural elements with a characteristic size (at least in one direction) of a few nanometer, typically from 1 to 100 nm.
Furthermore, it has been observed that, in scientific literature, zirconia-based ceramic materials with microstructural elements (grain size, GS) greater than 100 nm (sometimes GS equal to 500–600 nm) are also often defined as “nano”.
Very few studies were successful in obtaining fully dense nanostructure-based zirconia ceramics (GS < 100 nm, T.D. ≈ 99%) since, as illustrated in this review, it is very difficult to retain the microstructure on a real nanometric level.
Figure 1 reports a subdivision of the papers on the basis of the grain size of the developed final products: For the elaboration of Figure 1, only the paper reporting an experimental procedure to produce nanozirconia-made components were considered. In Figure 2, the geographical provenience of all the 74 analyzed scientific papers [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74] is reported. The subdivision has been made taking into account the affiliation of the first author of each paper with the aim to identify which geographic area is working more intensively on this topic.
Ceramic materials have been used for a long time in dentistry for the production of dental restorations due to their excellent biocompatibility, their good mechanical properties, and their aesthetic appearance, very similar to that of natural teeth.
In the last 15 years, the technological evolution behind the development of this class of materials has been remarkable and their use is becoming even more intensive [75], due to the growing request of patients around the world asking for metal free solutions. The development of totally metal free solutions is one of the main research topics in the field of dental materials and, even though metal alloys are still extensively used, their unnatural color and the insurgence of unwanted chemical–biological interactions connected with their use is encouraging the use of ceramics even more. At now, among the new research trends, there is the development of zirconia-based ceramics and composites having a nanometric structure, since several studies have demonstrated that nanostructured materials’ properties are different and generally improved, in respect to that of conventional materials.
A literature review of Cain and Morrell [76] summarizes the benefits connected to the use of nanostructured ceramics: The reduction of the grain size leads to an improvement of the strength, since finer grain size leads to stronger materials, the firing temperature can be reduced saving energy due to shorter firing times and lower temperatures, optical properties can be changed and the translucency can be improved resulting in the opportunity of producing transparent or more translucent ceramics. Nanostructured advanced ceramic materials have already been used in neurosurgery to manufacture prototypes of transparent calvarium prosthesis with the aim of avoiding repeated craniectomies after surgery [77]. The use of nanostructured alumina in the form of fibers and spheres has been proposed as a material for orthopedic implants with the aim of reproducing the structure of natural bone with a biomimetic approach [78]. The application of nanostructured zirconia and ceramic nanocomposites as material to manufacture hip prosthesis seem to greatly reduce the friction and wear and to increase stability, reliability, and durability of the prosthesis as a whole [79,80]. Despite these applications in the biomedical field, to date, little has been written on ceramic materials with nanoscale structure in dentistry [81]. This review covers the existing scientific literature on nanostructured zirconia-based ceramics and composites suitable for application in dentistry and turns the attention also to the existing commercial products.

2. Shaping and Sintering of Nanostructured Zirconia-Based Ceramics

The development of nanostructured ceramics implies, theoretically, a revision of the traditional shaping and sintering processes, with respect to conventional micrometric ceramic materials. On the nanometer scale, the surface properties start becoming more relevant than the bulk material properties, since a great part of the atoms is located on the surface of the initial particles and on the surface and boundaries of the grains in the final product.
The very small size of the starting powder particles, which are characterized by a great chemical reactivity, promotes lower sintering temperature and lower sintering times, which could ideally lead to increased production rates at reduced costs. The same high reactivity is, however, responsible for the agglomeration of nanoparticles that causes the emergence of large pores with inhomogeneous particle distribution leading to low density in the green compacts and in the final products.
The larger the agglomerate size, the higher the sintering temperature required to obtain fully dense materials [19]. A high sintering temperature, however, causes grain growth, leading the final product to became micrometric once the full density is reached. For this reason, to retain the microstructure at a nanometric level and, at the same time, avoiding the grain coarsening, is a bottle neck encountered in the processing of this class of materials.
Another major problem is related to the number of particle–particle point contacts per unit volume in a nanocrystalline powder that is much higher compared to a micrometric powder. Therefore, the frictional resistance to compaction is more pronounced.
Despite the described difficulties, several studies have demonstrated the possibility to develop nanostructured-based zirconia components suitable for dental applications. It is important to point out that, even though the research activity on ceramic nanomaterials was intense in the last 14 years and zirconia nanopowders are widely commercially available, only a very few studies were successful in developing fully dense zirconia-based products with grain size below or not too far from 100 nm. Some of these studies [10,16,17,27,37,41,45,46,52,66,67] are based on the use of conventional or adapted shaping and sintering techniques, such as slip casting, uniaxial pressing, cold isostatic pressing, powder injection molding, hot isostatic, pressing followed by conventional sintering or two step sintering. The two step sintering method, in particular, originally developed by Chen and Wang [82], seems to be specifically suitable for the densification of nanostructured ceramics since it limits the grain growth. This kind of sintering comprises a first step carried out at a higher temperature for a short period of time and then a rapid cooling to complete the second step at a lower temperature, which is maintained for a prolonged time. In this second step occurs the elimination of pores in a frozen microstructure with suppression of grain growth.
Other studies [2,3,5,6,25,26,41] are, instead, based on new and rapid sintering techniques, such as microwave sintering (characterized by many advantages compared to a conventional sintering process such as lower temperatures, shorter times, energy saving) and spark plasma sintering that have shown to produce nanocrystalline ceramics with relative high densities.
Beyond these studies, there are many others, including in their title or in the abstract of the word “nano”, but referring to the development of zirconia-based products (also including zirconia composites) with grain size generally much higher than 100 nm [9,12,13,14,18,20,21,22,24,34,40,49,51,53,54,57,60,61,65,68], following conventional processing routes or innovative routes, such as one of the latest innovations in shaping techniques, such as the magnetic pulsed compaction [8], or reporting no information on the final grain size [7,11,12,55].
Other studies report the development of micro/nano zirconia-based composites suitable for dental applications [30,31,32,47,56,57,59,71].

3. Properties of Zirconia at the Nanoscale

3.1. Limiting Low-Temperature Degradation (LTD) Kinetics in Y-TZP

Zirconia-based ceramics are widely known in dentistry thanks to the combination of their mechanical properties [83]. The optimum aesthetical appearance and the excellent biocompatibility and are widely used for the realization of endodontic posts, crown, bridges, and implant abutments. However, some zirconia-based ceramics suffer from an important drawback, which is their sensitivity to Low-Temperature Degradation (LTD), also known as hydrothermal aging [84]. This phenomenon, which has been extensively documented and well explained in previous reports [85,86,87,88,89], raises serious limitations to the applications of these materials in the biomedical field, especially in the oral environment, where zirconia-based ceramics are exposed to oral fluids and mechanical stress, causing possible irreversible premature failure of zirconia components.
Several studies have demonstrated that there is a relationship between the LTD resistance and the grain size and that a microstructure composed of nanometric grains leads to a suppression or to a reduction of the LTD sensitivity [90,91,92,93]. Nanostructured fully dense zirconia-based ceramics resistant to hydrothermal aging, with a grain size of <100 nm, were developed by Paul et al. [10] and with a grain size of <200 nm by Matsui et al. [14]. Transparent 3Y-TZP nanoceramics with an average grain size of 87 nm that show no noticeable low-temperature degradation after 100 h aging at 134 °C under a hydrothermal pressure of two bars were developed by Xiong at al. [15]. Fully dense materials with a critical grain size of < 0.36 μm (not “nano” in sensustricto) that do not show any evidence of degradation after extreme aging conditions at pressurized autoclaving in hot water at 100, 200, and 260 °C for 8 h were developed by Munoz-Saldana et al. [92]. This result was also reported by Hallmann et al. [93] that confirm that an average grain size of the dental Y-TZP below 0.3 μm is able to inhibit the phase transition under LTD conditions or at least decrease the transformation kinetics to negligible amount during the product lifetime.

3.2. Avoiding LTD by the Development of Composites with Alternative Dopants

A ceramic nanocomposite (NANOZR) was launched at the end of 90 s by Panasonic Electric Works. NANOZR was constituted by a matrix of 10 mol% CeO2 stabilized TZP and 30 vol% Al2O3 as a second phase. The nanostructure was designed so that many 10–100 nm Al2O3 particles were trapped within the ZrO2 grains, and that many 10 nm ZrO2 particles were trapped within the Al2O3 grains [62].
Tanaka et al. [31] found, after hydrothermal aging, only a slight variation in the content of the monoclinic phase in a Ce-TZP/Al nanocomposite while in the conventional Y-TZP such content reached 25.3%. Ban et al. [55] have performed an aging test of 14 days at 120 °C on Y-TZP and NANOZR. The authors reported an increase in the content of the monoclinic phase (from 3.8% to 75.5%) only for Y-TZP. In addition, after aging, no reduction in biaxial flexural strength of NANOZR was found while that of Y-TZP decreased by 17%.
Other authors [59] assessed the in vivo (implantation into rabbit tibiae) and in vitro (autoclaving or storage in physiological saline solution) effects of aging on stability of the tetragonal phase of Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite and Y-TZP. Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite showed a remarkable stability of the tetragonal phase, no decrease in strength, and no alteration of surface quality. On the contrary, the content of the monoclinic phase of Y-TZP was close to 80%. These results were confirmed by Perdigao et al. [35].
The effect of LTD on mechanical properties of ceramic nanocomposites was evaluated by comparing the biaxial flexural strength and the content of monoclinic zirconia inside NANOZR and a conventional Y-TZP before and after aging. The content of the monoclinic phase inside NANOZR was almost unchanged (from 4.8 vol% to 5.5 vol%) while in the conventional Y-TZP the increase was much more pronounced (from 0.3 vol% to 49.9 vol%). Similarly, the biaxial flexural strength of NANOZR was minimally reduced (from 1422 MPa to 1371 MPa), while that of conventional Y-TZP was decreased (from 1046 MPa to 892 MPa) [30].
Sim et al. [94] reported that occlusal adjustments performed using a superfine diamond bur can cause an increase in the t-m transformation and that Ce-TZP/Al2O3 had a higher flexural strength and greater resistance to LTD than Y-TZP.

3.3. Optical Properties

Reproducing a dental restoration that satisfactorily mimics the natural appearance of the teeth is one of the main challenges in dentistry: The appearance of a dental restoration depends on its optical properties, on the illumination condition, and on the optical properties of the core substructure. Among the different optical properties, an adequate translucency is essential to reproduce a realistic dental restoration. Translucency is the relative amount of light transmitted through a material [95] and is related to the thickness of the ceramic layer [96] and is strongly dependent on light scattering [97]. A translucent material allows some light to pass through it, absorbs some of the remainder, and scatters and reflects the rest from its surface or internal surface [98]. The scattering is due to several factors: The chemical nature, crystalline content, voids and porosity, and quantity and size of the crystals compared to the incident light wavelength [95]. An increase in crystalline content, while achieving greater strength, generally results in greater opacity [99,100]. For this reason, the polycrystalline ceramics, which are characterized by intense scattering effect, assume an opaque appearance [101] and are less translucent than glass ceramics. The clinical factors affecting the translucency of Y-TZP ceramics include: Thickness, cementation type, color of the monolithic zirconia, surface finishing methods and wear, dental background, cement color, and low-temperature degradation [102].
Casolco et al. [26] have recently shown that the translucency of partially stabilized zirconia can be improved significantly limiting, in the densely sintered material, the final size of crystals to 55 nm. This phenomenon, which has not yet been fully explained, is probably due to the fact that crystals of size smaller than the wavelength of visible light (400–700 nm) should not significantly hinder the passage of light [97]. Wang et al. [51] evaluated the influence of four heating rates (100°Kh−1, 200°Kh−1, 400°Kh−1, and 600°Kh−1) on the mechanical and optical properties of a nano structured yttria-stabilized zirconia. The authors found a correlation between the three higher heating rates (600°Kh−1, 400°Kh−1, 200°Kh−1) and the increase of the optical properties while no differences between the groups with regard to the mechanical properties were found. Jiang et al. [40] evaluated the effects of sintering temperature and particle size on the translucency of Y-TZP dental ceramics: The specimens were sintered at 1350 °C, 1400 °C, 1450 °C, and 1500 °C, and it was observed that the sintered densities and transmittances increased with the temperature from 1350 °C to 1500 °C.
Other studies [101] have evaluated the influence of the addition of alumina on the relative density and on the optical properties of zirconia/alumina nanocomposites. The increase in the percentage of the alumina from 0 to 10% causes a progressive decline in theoretical density and in transmittance of the composite ceramic material. Shiraishi et al. [101] reported that NANOZR becomes extremely opaque when this ceramic material is thicker than 0.3 mm. Pure zirconia nanopowders sintered densely could obtain the relatively high transmittance, while the transmittance and the lightness of slight addition of alumina changed significantly. The alumina addition influences the densification of the composite leading to a porosity increase that indirectly leads to a decreasing of the transmittance. Pores are highly efficient light scatters and thus very low porosity is required for ceramic to be transparent. The addition of alumina has an indirect effect on the transmittance of the composite ceramics through the porosity and the size of crystals. Zhang et al. [102] showed that it is possible to add small amounts of alumina or lanthanum oxide at the grain boundary that play a key role to decrease the LTD kinetics without compromising translucency.

3.4. Mechanical Properties

Zirconia-based ceramics exhibit the best mechanical properties ever attained among other ceramic materials. This is particularly true for TZP ceramics for which flexural strength ranges from 900 to 1200 MPa and fracture toughness from 7 to 10 MPa∙m1/2 [103,104,105].
For TZP ceramics, the high values of fracture toughness is related to the stress induced phase transformation from tetragonal to monoclinic, also known as, transformation toughening [106,107,108,109,110] that is accompanied by a volume increase on the order of 3–5% of grains, that generates compressive strength around the crack tip, thus, preventing the propagation of the crack. Traini et al. [111,112] showed that fracture toughness of Y-TZP was affected by surface grinding and that micrometric zirconia can be used for implant-supported restorations thanks to the high fracture strength value.
Due to the reduced grain size, nanostructured ceramics are expected to exhibit different and generally improved mechanical properties compared to conventional ceramic materials [41]. A microstructure with fine grain size, an excellent microstructural homogeneity and a fully dense structure is generally believed to generate improved mechanical properties.
Several studies have demonstrated an enhancement in the mechanical properties of nanostructured-based zirconia ceramics with respect to their micrometric counterparts. Dos Santos et al. [20] evaluated the properties of nanostructured 3Y-TZP blocks (ZrHP-nano®, see Section 5) used for CAD/CAM dental restorations and found that nanometric blocks (GS = 200 nm) had a hardness of 13 GPa, a fracture toughness of 11 MPa∙m1/2, a bending strength of 1020 MPa, and a Weibull modulus of 14, while micrometric ZrO2 blocks (GS = 500 nm) presented similar values of hardness, a fracture toughness of 8.5 MPa∙m1/2, a bending strength of 850 MPa, and a Weibull modulus of 10. Silva et al. [12] developed nanostructured yttria-stabilized zirconia blocks for dental applications and characterized them in terms of densification, crystalline phases, microstructure, and mechanical properties. They sintered the nanostructured blocks at 1400 °C (GS ≈ 250 nm) and the microstructured blocks (GS ≈ 1 μm) at 1600 °C and found a increase in flexural strength values (1020 MPa for nano and 855 MPa for micro), Weibull Modulus (13.1 for nano and 9.8 for micro), and fracture toughness values (11.2 MPa∙m1/2 for nano and 9.0 MPa∙m1/2). The higher fracture toughness was attributed to the maximization of volumetric fraction of retained tetragonal zirconia particles while the higher value of bending strength to induced nucleation of microcracks, increase of energy absorption during crack propagation, and developed compressive surface stress.
Other studies reporting some improvements on mechanical properties refer to the “nano/nano type” [46,67] or to the “micro/nano type” [9,56,62].
The Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite, ascribing to the “micro/nano type” NANOZR® possesses a very interesting combination of mechanical properties due to a particular microstructure [62] (see Section 5). A flexural strength of 1500 MPa, a fracture toughness of 18 MPa∙m1/2, an elastic modulus of 245 MPa, and a hardness of 12 GPa in addition to a very high resistance to LTD was found for this material.
Vasylkiv et al. [46] reported the production, by a colloidal technique and low-temperature sintering, of 0.75 to 3 mol% Y2O3 stabilized tetragonal zirconia and Al2O3/Y-TZP nanocomposites with 0.2 to 0.7 wt% of alumina, and determined the fracture toughness and hardness of the obtained samples. The bulk 2.7 Y-TZP with an average grain size of 110 nm reached a hardness of 13.6 GPa and a fracture toughness of 11.2 MPa∙m1/2 while the nanograined Al2O3/Y-TZP with an average size of 92 nm reached a hardness of 16.8 GPa. Y-TZP ceramics with a reduced yttria-stabilizer content were shown to reach a fracture toughness of 13.8 MPa∙m1/2 (2Y-TZP) and 14.5 MPa∙m1/2 (1.5Y-TZP). Y-TZP alumina composites with 0.35 wt% of alumina were shown to reach a fracture toughness of 15.7 MPa∙m1/2 (2Y) and 15.3 MPa∙m1/2 (1.5Y).
Another important mechanical property that has been observed for nanostructured ceramics is the superplasticity, that is the ability to deform in a ductile manner. This property, that make these material optimum candidates for near-net shape forming, has been so far observed for fine grained ceramics, not properly “nano” (with a grain size of <1 μm) that exhibit remarkable elongation to failure at moderate temperatures, typically half the melting point [19]. By further reducing the grain size to less than 100 nm it is possible to achieve much faster forming rates at much lower temperatures. The mechanism of deformation in nanosize ceramics occurs either by dislocation motion or by grain boundary sliding [39]. In nanoceramics of a grain size above ~100 nm, the main deformation mechanism is derived by dislocation motion, while for ultra-fine nano grain sizes (<50 nm) the deformation mechanism is derived by grain boundary sliding. YSZ exhibits superplastic strain rate 34 times faster than submicrometer grained YSZ when measured at the same temperature [36]. However, these properties, that have been demonstrated for several zirconia-based ceramics [47], seem to be not only dependent on the grain size: Domínguez-Rodríguez et al. [113], through a critical analysis of the plasticity of two important nanostructured oxide systems, MgO and yttria tetragonal zirconia polycrystals, show how nano-structuring may be a necessary, but not a sufficient condition for superplasticity in ceramics. A complex combination of effects and relationships are shown to modify the superplastic response.

4. Commercial Nanostructured Zirconia-Based Ceramics

An online research reveals that only two commercial products for dental application are defined as nanostructured: ZrHP-nano® (ProtMatMateriaisAvançados®-Brazil) and NANOZR® (Panasonic Healthcare–The Netherlands). Their main characteristics are reported in Table 1.
In the scientific literature, few papers (all from Brazil) refer to ZrHP-nano, but more papers deal with NANOZR.
ZrHP-nano is composed of 3 mol% of Y2O3 stabilized TZP and the average grain size is 150 nm, with crystallite dimensions of 18–70 nm [97].
NANOZR is composed of 10 mol% of CeO2 stabilized TZP as a matrix and 30 vol% of Al2O3 as second phase. The average size of the NANOZR is 0.49 μm. The significant characteristic of its structure is an intra-granular-type of nanostructure in which several 10–100 nm sized Al2O3 particles are trapped within the ZrO2 grains, and several 10 nm sized ZrO2 particles are trapped within the Al2O3 grains.
Han et al. [114] showed that NANOZR implants were biocompatible and capable of establishing a close bone–implant contact. A recent in vitro study performed by Komasa et al. [115] found that the modification of the NANOZR implant surface by alkali treatment can improve hard tissue formation surrounding implants. Rizo-Gorrita et al. [116,117] evaluated the early response of human gingival fibroblasts in contact with different materials and found that ceramic materials revealed a better cell response than the polymers. These results were consistent with findings from Okabe et al. [118]. This author found that NANOZR may impart resistance to exogenous stimuli through strong intercellular contacts with peri-implant mucosal cells when used as an abutment.

5. Clinical Trials and Indications of Nanostructured Zirconia-Based Ceramics

Up to now there are only two clinical trials on the use of nanostructured zirconia-based ceramics in dentistry. Philipp et al. [119] have reported promising results at one year of three unit-FPDs manufactured using a Ce-TZP/A-nanocomposite (NANOZR) as framework material. After a year of function, no failure of the framework and no chipping or fracture of the veneering ceramic was observed.
Tanaka et al. [120] assessed the clinical performance of veneered Ce-TZP/A-nanocomposite (three year follow-up) frameworks for fixed dental prostheses. Fifteen patients with 22 Ce-TZP/A-nanocomposite fixed prostheses were included in the study. Clinical events, including fracture and loss of retention, secondary caries, and marginal integrity, were recorded. The biologic outcome was judged by comparing the pre-treatment and post-treatment bleeding on probing (BOP) and probing pocket depth (PPD) of the abutment teeth. Radiographic examination was also performed at 12, 24, and 36 months. At 36 months of observation, the new Ce-TZP/A-nanocomposite prostheses exhibited a survival rate of 95.5%. Therefore, the new framework material was evaluated to be clinically reliable.
NANOZR can be used in a wide range of applications, including single crowns, long-span bridge frames, and fixed implant-supported prostheses.
Several authors [121,122] suggested designing a frame with a thickness of 0.3 mm on occlusal and axial surfaces. FPD’s connectors should be at least 3 mm × 3.5 mm. The framework should be veneered with a proper veneering ceramic. The material is not recommended to make veneers due to the low translucency (compared to dental glass-ceramics). In addition, these restorations cannot be adhesively luted since polycrystalline ceramics are not etchable.
Tanaka et al. [120] suggested to perform a sandblasting treatment, to apply a primer or a silane coupling agent on the material surface, and then to use a resin cement containing MDP (10-methacryloyloxy-decyldihydrogen-phosphate). This cementation protocol can be used also for micrometric zirconia [123]. The tooth should be prepared with a circumferentially rounded shoulder (width 0.8–1.0 mm), an occlusal reduction of 1.5–2.0 mm, and a proper conicity (6–10°).

6. Conclusions

Nanostructured ceramics can show improved properties because of the reduction of the grain size to the nanoscale. This is also true for zirconia-based nanoceramics, where these improvements can be used to develop highly reliable and aesthetic dental restorations. At present, the scientific research on nanostructured based zirconia components for dentistry has yet to overcome some important steps. One of the main goals is to retain the microstructure at the nanometric size and, at the same time, preserving the full density of the components, since very few studies were successful in obtaining fully dense nanostructure-based zirconia ceramics with a grain size of <100 nm.
Despite this difficulty, an interesting and alternative solution could be the use of micro/nano composites as, for example, Ce-TZP based nano-composites, that show optimum mechanical properties and good aging stability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.A. and F.P.; Methodology: E.R.; Resources and data curation: C.M. and A.D.F.; Writing—original draft preparation: A.A., F.P., and E.R.; Writing—review and editing: J.C.; Supervision: M.C.B.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gleiter, H. Nanostructured materials: State of the art and perspectives. Nanostruct. Mater. 1995, 6, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Binner, J.; Annapoorani, K.; Paul, A.; Santacruz, I.; Vaidhyanathan, B. Dense nanostructured zirconia by two stage conventional/hybrid microwave sintering. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 28, 973–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Binner, J.; Vaidhyanathan, B. Processing of bulk nanostructured ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 28, 1329–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Binner, J.; Annapoorani, K.; Vaidhyanathan, B. Spray freeze granulation of nano powders for die pressing. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2010, 63, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Binner, J.; Vaidhyanathan, B.; Paul, A.; Annaporani, K.; Raghupathy, B. Compositional effects in nanostructured yttria partially stabilized zirconia. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2011, 8, 766–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Binner, J.; Vaidhyanathan, B.; Carney, T. Microwave hybrid sintering of nanostructured YSZ ceramics. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2006, 45, 835–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Norakmal, A.; Ramesh, S.; Tan, C.Y.; Teng, W.D. Densification behavior of nano Y-TZP ceramics. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 372, 165–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Park, H.Y.; Kilicaslan, M.F.; Hong, S.J. Densification behaviour analysis of ZrO2 nanopowders for dental applications compacted by magnetic pulsed compaction. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2013, 141, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ai, Y.L.; Xie, X.H.; He, W.; Liang, B.L.; Chen, W.H. Effect of nano-Al2O3 on the microstructure and properties of ZrO2 dental materials prepared by microwave sintering. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 618, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paul, A.; Vaidhyanathan, B.; Binner, J.G.P. Hydrothermal aging behavior of nanocrystalline y-tzp ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 94, 2146–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bondioli, M.J.; De Faria Daguano, J.K.M.; Palmeira, A.A.; dos Santos, C.; Strecker, K. Influence of the sintering conditions on the mechanical properties of nanosized TZP ceramics. Mater. Sci. Forum 2010, 660–661, 826–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Silva, C.P.; Santos, C.; Silva, C.R.M. Mechanical properties of nanostructured zirconia. Mater. Sci. Forum 2010, 660, 757–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ai, Y.L.; Xie, X.; He, W.; Liang, B.L.; Chen, W. Microstructure and properties of Al2O3-ZrO2 ceramics prepared by microwave sintering. Key Eng. Mater. 2015, 633, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Matsui, K.; Yoshida, H.; Ikuhara, Y. Nanocrystalline, ultra-degradation-resistant zirconia: Its grain boundary nanostructure and nanochemistry. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xiong, Y.; Fu, Z.; Pouchly, V.; Maca, K.; Shen, Z. Preparation of transparent 3Y-TZP nanoceramics with no low-temperature degradation. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 97, 1402–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Morozova, L.V.; Kalinina, M.V.; Koval’ko, N.Y.; Arsent’ev, M.Y.; Shilova, O.A. Preparation of zirconia based nanoceramics with a high degree of tetragonality. Glass. Phys. Chem. 2014, 40, 352–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Trunec, M.; Maca, K. Processing and properties of nanocrystalline tetragonal zirconia. Key Eng. Mater. 2007, 336, 2300–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, Y.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Bose, S. Processing of alumina and zirconia nano-powders and compacts. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 380, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mayo, M.J. Processing of nanocrystalline ceramics from ultrafine particles. Int. Mater. Rev. 1996, 41, 85–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dos Santos, C.; Santos, F.A.; Elias, C.N. Properties of nanostructured 3Y-TZP blocks used for CAD/CAM dental restoration. Key Eng. Mater. 2009, 396, 603–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, Y.I.; Sung, S.H.; Lee, S.M.; Lee, W.; Lee, S.H.; Lim, B.S.; Byun, J.S.; Hyun, C.Y.; Hwang, Y.; Byeon, J. Sintering behavior of 3 mol% yttria-stabilized CAD/CAM dental zirconia with different types of commercial powder. J. Ceram. Process Res. 2012, 13, s31–s36. [Google Scholar]
  22. Morita, K.; Hiraga, K.; Kim, B.N.; Yoshida, H. Strengthening of ZrO2 ceramics due to nano-crystallization. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2006, 45, 1674–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Palmero, P.; Montanaro, L.; Reveron, H.; Chevalier, J. Surface coating of oxide powders: A new synthesis method to process biomedical grade nano-composites. Materials 2014, 7, 5012–5037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Amat, N.F.; Muchtar, A.; Ghazali, M.J.; Yahaya, N. Suspension stability and sintering influence on yttria-stabilized zirconia fabricated by colloidal processing. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 5413–5419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Anselmi-Tamburini, U.; Woolman, J.N.; Munir, Z.A. Transparent nanometric cubic and tetragonal zirconia obtained by high-pressure pulsed electric current sintering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2007, 17, 3267–3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Casolco, S.R.; Xu, J.; Garay, J.E. Transparent/translucent polycrystalline nanostructured yttria stabilized zirconia with varying colors. Scr. Mater. 2008, 58, 516–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, P.C.; Li, Q.F.; Fuh, J.Y.H.; Li, T.; Lu, L. Two-stage sintering of nano-sized yttria stabilized zirconia process by powder injection moulding. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2007, 192, 312–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Inokoshi, M.; Vanmeensel, K.; Zhang, F.; De Munck, J.; Eliades, G.; Minakuchi, S.; Naert, I.; Van Meerbeek, B.; Vleugels, J. Aging resistance of surface-treated dental zirconia. Dent. Mater. 2015, 31, 182–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Qiang, W.; Mingzhu, Z.; Lingna, S.; Changwen, H.; Chuanbao, C. Application of tetragonal nano-zirconia in ceramic teeth. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2012, 217–219, 235–238. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ban, S.; Sato, H.; Suehiro, Y.; Nakanishi, H.; Nawa, M. Biaxial flexure strength and low temperature degradation of Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite and Y-TZP as dental restoratives. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B. 2008, 87, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tanaka, K.; Tamura, J.; Kawanabe, K.; Nawa, M.; Oka, M.; Uchida, M.; Kokubo, T.; Nakamura, T. Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite as a bearing material in total joint replacement. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 63, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mineiro, S.L.; Nono, M.C.A. Compaction behaviour of Yttria-zirconia powders obtained from micro and nanoparticles mixtures. Mater. Sci. Forum 2008, 591, 504–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fischer, J.; Stawarczyk, B. Compatibility of machined Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite and a veneering ceramic. Dent. Mater. 2007, 23, 1500–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ghosh, S.; Chokshi, A.H. Creep in nanocrystalline zirconia. Scr. Mater. 2014, 86, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Perdigão, J.; Pinto, A.M.; Monteiro, R.C.; BrazFernandes, F.M.; Laranjeira, P.; Veiga, J.P. Degradation of dental ZrO2-based materials after hydrothermal fatigue. Part I: XRD, XRF, and FESEM analyses. Dent. Mater. J. 2012, 31, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Mukaeda, L.E.; Taguchi, S.P.; Robin, A.; Izario, H.J.; Salazar, F.S.; Santos, C. Degradation of Y2O3-stabilized ZrO2 ceramics in artificial saliva: ICP analysis of dissolved Y3+ and Zr4+ ions. Mater. Sci. Forum 2012, 727, 1136–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Amat, N.F.; Muchtar, A.; Yahaya, N.; Ghazali, M.J. Effect of dispersant agent amount in colloidal processing of zirconia dental ceramic. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 622, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mukaeda, L.E.; Robin, A.; Santos, C.; Taguchi, S.P.; Machado, J.P.B.; Borges, L.A., Jr. Effect of pH and fluoride on behavior of dental ZrO2 ceramics in artificial saliva. Mater. Sci. Forum 2010, 660, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yamashita, D.; Machigashira, M.; Miyamoto, M.; Takeuchi, H.; Noguchi, K.; Ban, S. Effect of surface roughness on initial responses of osteoblast-like cells on two types of zirconia. Dent. Mater. J. 2009, 28, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Jiang, L.; Liao, Y.; Wan, Q.; Li, W. Effects of sintering temperature and particle size on the translucency of zirconium dioxide dental ceramic. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2011, 22, 2429–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Morita, K.; Hiraga, K.; Kim, B.N.; Yoshida, H.; Sakka, Y. Fabrication of nanocrystalline superplastic ZrO2 ceramics. Mater. Sci. Forum 2007, 551, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Takano, T.; Tasaka, A.; Yoshinari, M.; Sakurai, K. Fatigue strength of Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite with different surfaces. J. Dent. Res. 2012, 91, 800–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Benzaid, R.; Chevalier, J.; Saadaoui, M.; Fantozzi, G.; Nawa, M.; Diaz, L.A.; Torrecillas, R. Fracture toughness, strength and slow crack growth in a ceria stabilized zirconia—Alumina nanocomposite for medical applications. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 3636–3641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yoshida, H.; Morita, K.; Kim, B.N.; Hiraga, K. Grain boundary nanostructure and high temperature plastic flow in polycrystalline oxide ceramics. Mater. Sci. Forum 2010, 638, 1731–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vasylkiv, O.; Sakka, Y.; Skorokhod, V.V. Hardness and fracture toughness of alumina-doped tetragonal zirconia with different Yttria contents. Mater. Trans. 2003, 44, 2235–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vasylkiv, O.; Sakka, Y.; Skorokhod, V.V. High-toughness tetragonal zirconia and zirconia/alumina nano-ceramics. Key Eng. Mater. 2004, 264, 2347–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ban, S.; Nawa, M.; Sugata, F.; Tsuruki, J.; Kono, H.; Kawai, T. HRTEM observation of bonding interface between Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite and porcelain. Dent. Mater. J. 2014, 33, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fischer, J.; Stawarczyk, B.; Trottmann, A.; Hämmerle, C.H.F. Impact of thermal properties of veneering ceramics on the fracture load of layered Ce-TZP/A nanocomposite frameworks. Dent. Mater. 2009, 25, 326–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Li, J.; Yunmao, L.; Wei, L.; Qianbing, W.; Yongqi, Z. Influence of alumina addition on the optical property of zirconia/alumina composite dental ceramics. J. Wuhan. Univ. Technol. Mat. Sci. Edit. 2011, 26, 690–695. [Google Scholar]
  50. Elsaka, S.E. Influence of surface treatments on the surface properties of different zirconia cores and adhesion of zirconia-veneering ceramic systems. Dent. Mat. 2013, 29, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, Y.; Huang, H.; Gao, L.; Zhang, F. Investigation of a new 3Y-stabilized zirconia with an improved optical property for applications as a dental ceramic. J. Ceram. Process. Res. 2011, 12, 473–476. [Google Scholar]
  52. Vasylkiv, O.; Sakka, Y.; Skorokhod, V. Low temperature sintering of zirconia and zirconia-alumina composite nanopowders. Key Eng. Mater. 2002, 206–213, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  53. Díaz, L.A.; Rivera, S.; Fernández, A.; Okunkova, A.; Vladimirov Yu, G.; Torrecillas, R. Mechanical behavior of alumina toughened zirconia nanocomposites with different alumina additions. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2014, 96, 61–66. [Google Scholar]
  54. Amato, I. Mechanical properties of nanostructured ceramic materials. Mater. Sci. Forum 2004, 455, 550–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ban, S.; Nawa, M.; Suehiro, Y.; Nakanishi, H. Mechanical properties of zirconia/alumina nano-composite after soaking in various water-based conditions. Key Eng. Mater. 2006, 309, 1219–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, W.; Yu, D.; Wang, F. Microstructure and mechanical property of zirconia nanocomposites. Key Eng. Mater. 2010, 434, 594–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, C.; Han, Y.; Guo, S.; Zhang, F.; Fu, H. Microstructure and toughening mechanism of ZrO2 ceramic. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 535, 814–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chevalier, J.; Deville, S.; Fantozzi, G. Nanostructured ceramic oxides with a slow crack growth resistance close to covalent materials. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 1297–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tanaka, K.; Tamura, J.; Kawanabe, K.; Nawa, M.; Uchida, M.; Kokubo, T.; Nakamura, T. Phase stability after aging and its influence on pin-on-disk wear properties of Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite and conventional Y-TZP. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2003, 67, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, G. Preparation and characterization of zirconia-based multi-phase nanocomposite. Key Eng. Mater. 2008, 368, 762–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Okuda, Y.; Noda, M.; Kono, H.; Miyamoto, M.; Sato, H.; Ban, S. Radio-opacity of core materials for all-ceramic restorations. Dent. Mater. J. 2010, 29, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Ban, S. Reliability and properties of core materials for all-ceramic dental restorations. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2008, 44, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Estournès, C.; Oquab, D.; Selezneff, S.; Boidot, M.; Monceau, D.; Grossin, D.; Drouet, C.; Chung, U.C.; Roulland, F.; Elissalde, C.; et al. Shaping of nanostructured materials or coatings through spark plasma sintering. Mater. Sci. Forum 2012, 706, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fischer, J.; Stawarczyk, B.; Sailer, I.; Hämmerle, C.H.F. Shear bond strength between veneering ceramics and ceria-stabilized zirconia/alumina. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2010, 103, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Mineiro, S.L.; Nono, M.C.A.; Kuranaga, C. Sintering properties of ZrO2-3 Mol% Y2O3 obtained from mixture of nano and microcrystalline powders. Mater. Sci. Forum 2006, 530, 456–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, L.; Rouxel, T.; Chaim, R.; Vesteghem, H.; Sherman, D. Superplasticity and creep in monoclinic and Y-PSZ nano-grained zirconia. Mater. Sci. Forum 1997, 243, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yi, Z.; Sun, H.; Wang, B.; Zhai, F.; Xie, Z. The effect of nano-Al2O3 on sintering behavior and mechanical property of ZrO2 ceramics. Key Eng. Mater. 2014, 602, 327–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sivanesan, S.; Singh, R.; Leong, C.K. The governance of sintering regimes on the properties and ageing resistance of Y-TZP ceramic. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 545, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, Y.L.; Jin, X.J.; Rong, Y.H.; Hsu, T.Y.; Jiang, D.Y.; Shi, J.L. The size dependence of structural stability in nano-sized ZrO2 particles. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2006, 438, 399–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Han, J.M.; Hong, G.; Matsui, H.; Shimizu, Y.; Zheng, G.; Lin, H.; Sasaki, K. The surface characterization and bioactivity of NANOZR in vitro. Dent. Mater. J. 2014, 33, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Nawa, M.; Nakamoto, S.; Sekino, T.; Niihara, K. Tough and strong Ce-TZP/Alumina nanocomposites doped with titania. Ceram. Int. 1998, 24, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ai, Y.; Xie, X.; He, W.; Liang, B.L.; Fan, Y. Microstructure and properties of Al2O3(n)/ZrO2 dental ceramics prepared by two-step microwave sintering. Mater. Design 2015, 65, 1021–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Theng, K.Y.; Muchtar, A.; Yahaya, N.; Ghazali, M.J. Development of translucent zirconia for dental crown applications. Asian J. Sci. Res. 2015, 8, 342–350. [Google Scholar]
  74. Tredici, I.G.; Sebastiani, M.; Massimi, F.; Bemporad, E.; Resmini, A.; Merlati, G.; Tamburini, U.A. Low temperature degradation resistant nanostructured yttria-stabilized zirconia for dental applications. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 8190–8197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gherlone, E.; Mandelli, F.; Capparè, P.; Pantaleo, G.; Traini, T.; Ferrini, F. A 3 years retrospective study of survival for zirconia-based single crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions. J. Dent. 2014, 42, 1151–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Cain, M.; Morell, R. Nanostructured ceramics: A review of their potential. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2001, 15, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Damestani, Y.; Reynolds, C.L.; Szu, J.; Hsu, M.S.; Kodera, Y.; Binder, D.K.; Park, B.H.; Garay, J.E.; Rao Masaru, P.; Aguilar, G. Transparent nanocrystalline Yttria-stabilized-zirconia calvarium prosthesis. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. 2013, 9, 1135–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sato, M.; Webster, T.J. Nanobiotechnology: Implications for the future of nanotechnology in orthopedic applications. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2004, 1, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dubok, V.A.; Lashneva, V.V. New materials and processes for improvement of hip prostheses. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 2011, 49, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Affatato, S.; Torrecillas, R.; Taddei, P.; Rocchi, M.; Fagnano, C.; Ciapetti, G.; Toni, A. Advanced nanocomposite materials for orthopaedic applications: A long-term in vitro wear study of zirconia-toughened alumina. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2006, 78, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lewandowska, M.; Siejka-Kulczyk, J.; Andrzejczuk, M.; Kurzydłowski, K.J. Nanomaterials in dental applications. Solid State Phenom. 2008, 140, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chen, I.W.; Wang, X.H. Sintering dense nanocrystalline ceramics without final stage grain growth. Nature 2000, 404, 168–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Denry, I.; Kelly, J.R. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent. Mater. 2008, 24, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Chevalier, J.; Gremillard, L.; Deville, S. Low-temperature degradation of zirconia and implications for biomedical implants. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2007, 37, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chevalier, J.; Cales, B.; Drouin, J.M. Low temperature degradation aging of Y-TZP ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 82, 2150–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Deville, S.; Chevalier, J.; Fantozzi, G.; Bartolome, J.F.; Requena, J.; Moya, J.; Torrecillas, R.; Diaz, L.A. Low temperature ageing of zirconia toughened alumina ceramics and its implication in biomedical implants. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2003, 23, 2975–2982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lughi, V.; Sergo, V. Low temperature degradation-aging-of zirconia: A critical review of the relevant aspects in dentistry. Dent. Mater. 2010, 26, 807–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hallmann, L.; Mehl, A.; Ulmer, P.; Reusser, E.; Stadler, J.; Zenobi, R.; Stawarczyk, B.; Özcan, M.; Hämmerle, C.H.F. The influence of grain size on low-temperature degradation of dental zirconia. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 2012, 100, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sato, T.; Shimada, M. Control of the tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation of yttria partially stabilized zirconia in hot water. J. Mater. Sci. 1985, 20, 3988–3992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jue, J.F.; Chen, J.; Virkar, A.V. Low-temperature aging of t’-zirconia: The role of microstructure on phase stability. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1991, 74, 1811–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, J.F.; Watanabe, R. Phase transformation in Y2O3-partially-stabilized ZrO2 polycrystals of various grain sizes during low-temperature aging in water. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1998, 81, 2687–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Munoz-Saldana, J.; Balmori-Ramirez, H.; Jaramillo-Vigueras, D.; Iga, T.; Schneider, G.A. Mechanical properties and low-temperature aging of tetragonal zirconia polycrystals processed by hot isostatic pressing. J. Mater. Res. 2003, 18, 2415–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hallmann, L.; Ulmer, P.; Reusser, E.; Louvel, M.; Hämmerlea, C.H.F. Effect of dopants and sintering temperature on microstructure and low temperature degradation of dental Y-TZP-zirconia. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 32, 4091–4104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sim, I.G.; Shin, Y.; Shim, J.S.; Kim, J.E.; Kim, J.H. Effects of artificial aging on the biaxial flexural strength of Ce-TZP/Al2O3 and Y-TZP after various occlusal adjustments. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 9951–9959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Antonson, S.A.; Anusavice, K.J. Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2001, 14, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  96. Brodbelt, R.H.; O’Brien, W.J.; Fan, P.L. Translucency of dental porcelains. J. Dent. Res. 1980, 59, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Van Noort, R. All-ceramic restorations: High-strength core ceramics. In Introduction to Dental Materials, 4th ed.; Mosby Wolfe: London, UK, 2013; pp. 205–208. [Google Scholar]
  98. Denry, I.; Holloway, J.A. Ceramics for dental applications: A review. Materials 2010, 3, 351–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Baldissara, P.; Llukacej, A.; Ciocca, L.; Valandro, F.L.; Scotti, R. Translucency of zirconia copings made with different CAD/CAM systems. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2010, 104, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Pekkan, G.; Özcan, M.; Subaşı, M.G. Clinical factors affecting the translucency of monolithic Y-TZP ceramics. Odontology 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Shiraishi, T.; Watanabe, I. Thickness dependence of light transmittance, translucency and opalescence of a Ceria-stabilized zirconia/alumina nanocomposite for dental applications. Dent. Mater. 2016, 32, 660–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhang, F.; Chevalier, J.; Olagnon, C.; Batuk, M.; Hadermann, J.; Van Meerbeek, B.; Vleugels, J. Grain-boundary engineering for aging and slow-crack-growth resistant zirconia. J. Dent. Res. 2017, 96, 774–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Garvie, R.C.; Hannink, R.H.J.; Pascoe, R.T. Ceramic steel? Nature 1975, 258, 703–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Green, D.J.; Hannink, R.H.J.; Swain, M.V. Transformation Toughening of Ceramics, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1989; pp. 57–91. [Google Scholar]
  105. Heuer, A.H. Transformation toughening in ZrO2-containing ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1987, 70, 689–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Claussen, N.; Rühle, M.; Heuer, A.H. Advances in Ceramics: Science and Technology of Zirconia II, 12th ed.; American Ceramic Society: Columbus, OH, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  107. Marshall, D.B.; Evans, A.G.; Drory, M.D. Transformation toughening in ceramics. In Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, 1st ed.; Bradt, R.C., Evans, A.G., Hasselman, D.P.H., Lange, F.F., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1983; Volume 6, pp. 289–307. [Google Scholar]
  108. Meyers, M.A.; Mishra, A.; Benson, D.J. Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2006, 51, 427–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Pelleg, J. (Ed.) Mechanical properties of nanoscale ceramics. In Mechanical Properties of Ceramics. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 213, pp. 705–759. [Google Scholar]
  110. Mayo, M.J. Superplasticity in Advanced Materials. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Superplasticity in Advanced Materials, Osaka, Japan, 3–6 June 1991. [Google Scholar]
  111. Traini, T.; Gherlone, E.; Parabita, S.F.; Caputi, S.; Piattelli, A. Fracture toughness and hardness of a Y-TZP dental ceramic after mechanical surface treatments. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2014, 18, 707–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Traini, T.; Sorrentino, R.; Gherlone, E.; Perfetti, F.; Bollero, P.; Zarone, F. Fracture strength of zirconia and alumina ceramic crowns supported by implants. J. Oral. Implantol. 2015, 41, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Domínguez-Rodríguez, A.; Gómez-García, D.; Castillo-Rodríguez, M.; Zapata-Solvas, E.; Chaim, R. Superplasticity in nanocrystalline ceramics: Pure grain boundary phenomena or not? Int. J. Mater. Res. 2010, 101, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Han, J.M.; Hong, G.; Lin, H.; Shimizu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zheng, G.; Zhang, H.; Sasaki, K. Biomechanical and histological evaluation of the osseointegration capacity of two types of zirconia implant. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 6507–6516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Komasa, S.; Nishizaki, M.; Zhang, H.; Takao, S.; Yin, D.; Terada, C.; Kobayashi, Y.; Kusumoto, T.; Yoshimine, S.; Nishizaki, H.; et al. Osseointegration of alkali-modified NANOZR implants: An in vivo study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Rizo-Gorrita, M.; Herráez-Galindo, C.; Torres-Lagares, D.; Serrera-Figallo, M.Á.; Gutiérre-Pérez, J.L. Biocompatibility of polymer and ceramic CAD/CAM materials with human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs). Polymers 2019, 11, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Rizo-Gorrita, M.; Luna-Oliva, I.; Serrera-Figallo, M.Á.; Gutiérrez-Pérez, J.L.; Torres-Lagares, D. Comparison of cytomorphometry and early cell response of human gingival fibroblast (HGFs) between zirconium and new zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics (ZLS). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Okabe, E.; Ishihara, Y.; Kikuchi, T.; Izawa, A.; Kobayashi, S.; Goto, H.; Kamiya, Y.; Sasaki, K.; Ban, S.; Noguchi, T.; et al. Adhesion properties of human oral epithelial-derived cells to zirconia. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2016, 18, 906–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Philipp, A.; Fischer, J.; Hämmerle, C.H.; Sailer, I. Novel ceria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia/alumina nanocomposite as framework material for posterior fixed dental prostheses: Preliminary results of a prospective case series at 1 year of function. Quintessence Int. 2010, 41, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  120. Tanaka, S.; Takaba, M.; Ishiura, Y.; Kamimura, E.; Baba, K. A 3-year follow-up of ceria-stabilized zirconia/alumina nanocomposite (Ce-TZP/A) frameworks for fixed dental prostheses. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2015, 59, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Omori, S.; Komada, W.; Yoshida, K.; Miura, H. Effect of thickness of zirconia-ceramic crown frameworks on strength and fracture pattern. Dent. Mater. J. 2013, 32, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Matsukawa, K.; Nemoto, R.; Nozaki, K.; Kubo, M.; Inagaki, T.; Yoshida, K.; Miura, H. The influence of the framework thickness on surface strain of the 3-unit zirconia resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses under the functional loading. Asian Pac. J. Dent. 2017, 17, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  123. Guilardi, L.F.; Pereira, G.K.R.; Giordani, J.C.; Kleverlaan, C.J.; Valandro, L.F.; Rippe, M.P. Effect of zirconia surface treatment, resin cement and aging on the load-bearing capacity under fatigue of thin simplified full-contour Y-TZP restorations. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2019, 97, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 09 01393 g001 550
Figure 1. Percentage of scientific papers concerning the development of nanostructured zirconia-based ceramics on the basis of the grain size (GS) of the developed products.
Figure 1. Percentage of scientific papers concerning the development of nanostructured zirconia-based ceramics on the basis of the grain size (GS) of the developed products.
Nanomaterials 09 01393 g001
Nanomaterials 09 01393 g002 550
Figure 2. Geographical provenience of scientific papers on nanostructured-based zirconia components found in this research.
Figure 2. Geographical provenience of scientific papers on nanostructured-based zirconia components found in this research.
Nanomaterials 09 01393 g002
Table
Table 1. Synoptic table of the main characteristics of commercial nanostructured zirconia-based ceramics for dental applications.
Table 1. Synoptic table of the main characteristics of commercial nanostructured zirconia-based ceramics for dental applications.
Commercial NameZrHP-nano®NANOZR®
CompositionY-TZPCe-TZP and Al2O3
Average grain size, nm150–240490 matrix
10–100 precipitates
Density, r, g/cm36.055.56
Vickers hardness, HV, GPa11–1312
Fracture toughness, KIC, MPa√m8–119–18
Flexural strength, s, MPa10201422–1500
Elastic modulus, E, GPa205245
Weibull modulus, m13–1423

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arena, A.; Prete, F.; Rambaldi, E.; Bignozzi, M.C.; Monaco, C.; Di Fiore, A.; Chevalier, J. Nanostructured Zirconia-Based Ceramics and Composites in Dentistry: A State-of-the-Art Review. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1393. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101393

AMA Style

Arena A, Prete F, Rambaldi E, Bignozzi MC, Monaco C, Di Fiore A, Chevalier J. Nanostructured Zirconia-Based Ceramics and Composites in Dentistry: A State-of-the-Art Review. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(10):1393. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101393

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arena, Antonio, Francesca Prete, Elisa Rambaldi, Maria Chiara Bignozzi, Carlo Monaco, Adolfo Di Fiore, and Jérôme Chevalier. 2019. "Nanostructured Zirconia-Based Ceramics and Composites in Dentistry: A State-of-the-Art Review" Nanomaterials 9, no. 10: 1393. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101393

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop