Next Article in Journal
Ultrasensitive and Multiplexed Target Detection Strategy Based on Photocleavable Mass Tags and Mass Signal Amplification
Previous Article in Journal
Scaling, Leakage Current Suppression, and Simulation of Carbon Nanotube Field-Effect Transistors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phase Evolution of High-Entropy Stannate Pyrochlore Oxide Synthesized via Glycine-Assisted Sol–Gel Synthesis as a Thermal Barrier Coating Material
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Growth and Characterization of Ga2O3 for Power Nanodevices Using Metal Nanoparticle Catalysts

1
Nanotechnology Application Program, Energy and Building Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Safat 13109, Kuwait
2
American Romanian Academy of Arts and Sciences, Citrus Heights, CA 95616, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(15), 1169; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151169
Submission received: 28 June 2025 / Revised: 25 July 2025 / Accepted: 26 July 2025 / Published: 29 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preparation and Characterization of Nanomaterials)

Abstract

A simple and inexpensive thermal oxidation process is used to grow β-Ga2O3 oxide (β-Ga2O3) thin films/nanorods on a c-plane (0001) sapphire substrate using Ag/Au catalysts. The effect of these catalysts on the growth mechanism of Ga2O3 was studied by different characterization techniques, including X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and Energy Dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX). The XRD results of the grown Ga2O3 on a sapphire substrate show three sharp diffraction peaks located at 19.31°, 38.70° and 59.38° corresponding to the 2 ¯ 01 ,   4 ¯ 02 and 6 ¯ 03 planes of β-Ga2O3. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM) analysis showed the formation of longer and denser Ga2O3 nanowires at higher temperatures, especially in the presence of silver nanoparticles as catalysts.

1. Introduction

Gallium oxide (Ga2O3), a semiconductor with a broad bandgap of about 4.9 eV, has drawn a lot of interest because of its potential applications in ultraviolet, photodetection, high-power electronics and optoelectronics [1,2]. Its exceptional properties, such as excellent electron mobility, high breakdown voltage and outstanding thermal stability, make it an ideal candidate for high-temperature and high-voltage applications [3]. However, the performance of Ga2O3-based devices depends on the material’s crystal size, morphology and defect density. Therefore, understanding and controlling the growth mechanism of Ga2O3 is crucial for optimizing its properties and scaling up production for industrial purposes.
Several studies have been reported in the literature to investigate the growth mechanism and produce high-quality Ga2O3 nanostructures using various methods. Shi et al. [4] created Ga2O3 thin films using vacuum thermal evaporation and post-annealing in air at different temperatures. They observed an increase in the bandgap from 4.70 eV to 5.13 eV as the annealing temperature increased from 400 °C to 1100 °C. While this post-annealing procedure improves the quality of the material, it requires high temperatures, leading to higher energy costs and longer processing times. This may be expensive, especially for large-scale production. Recent research has explored the use of metal nanoparticles, such as gold and silver, as catalysts to enhance the formation of Ga2O3 nanostructures, with the aim of solving these drawbacks [5,6].
Catalysts such as Ag and Au significantly enhance the wettability of liquid gallium on substrates, leading to more oxidation and high-density formation of Ga2O3 nanostructures. Alhalaili et al. [7] demonstrated that using an Ag catalyst with photoelectrochemical etching on silicon surfaces significantly improved Ga wettability, resulting in homogeneous and dense development of Ga2O3, even in deep pores. Without the Ag catalyst, Ga formed irregular droplets causing non-uniform Ga2O3 production and partial oxidation. These catalysts are crucial for regulating the shape and quality of Ga2O3 nanostructures. In addition to increased Ga wettability, Ag and Au catalysts help promote oxygen molecule dissociation by lowering the activation energy for oxygen adsorption and dissociation on their surfaces, facilitating the reaction with gallium to form Ga2O3. This process involves the metal nanoparticles acting as oxygen reservoirs, where oxygen molecules adsorb onto the catalyst surface, dissociate into atomic oxygen and subsequently react with liquid gallium to nucleate Ga2O3 nanostructures [8,9].
Keerthana et al. [10] found that Ag-decorated β-Ga2O3 heterostructures have better photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution due to improved electron-hole pair separation. Woo et al. [11] developed an Ag/GaO3 bilayer electrode for near-ultraviolet light-emitting diodes (LEDs), which showed enhanced conductivity, stability and transparency, improving LED performance. Zhou et al. [12] studied the interstitial oxygen position in both Ag and Au, finding that while Au had a higher oxygen diffusivity, Ag had a higher oxygen concentration. These findings further support the role of Ag and Au as catalysts. The growth rate and quality of Ga2O3 can be influenced by this variation in oxygen dynamics, where Ag promotes the synthesis of Ga2O3 and Au facilitates faster oxidation.
This study investigates the growth of Ga2O3 nanostructures on sapphire substrates using Ag and Au nanoparticles as catalysts at 800 °C and 900 °C. Unlike previous research work that generally discussed catalyst effects, our work focuses on how temperature, catalyst type and catalyst concentration affect Ga2O3 morphology, crystallinity and composition. These variables were analysed with X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (FESEM-EDS). The FESEM analysis reveals how different temperatures and catalyst conditions affect the formation of denser nanowires or nanosheets, aiding in optimizing properties for optoelectronics, sensors and high-power electronics.
The synthesis of Ga2O3 nanowires in the presence metal nanoparticles such as Ag [8,9] or Au [13] significantly influences developments in electronics and optoelectronics. These Ga2O3 nanowires have potential applications in FinFETs [14], UV detectors [9] and field-emitters [15]. Previous studies, such as those by Chunyang et al. [13], Xu et al. [14] and Tang et al. [15], have utilized Au nanoparticles as catalysts for β-Ga2O3 nanowire growth via metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) and demonstrated applications in FinFETs and field-emitters. In contrast, this work employs a cost-effective thermal evaporation method, which is simpler and more scalable than MOCVD, reducing energy costs and equipment complexity. Furthermore, we compare the efficacy of Ag and Au catalysts, revealing that Ag nanoparticles enhance the formation of denser and longer β-Ga2O3 nanowires due to higher oxygen solubility and diffusion, a novel aspect not extensively explored in prior studies. This systematic investigation of catalyst type, concentration, gallium amount and temperature provides critical insights for optimizing β-Ga2O3 nanostructures for applications in optoelectronics, sensors and high-power electronics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. β-Ga2O3 Thin Films/Nanorod Growth

The thermal evaporation method was used to grow β-Ga2O3 thin films/nanorods on an Al2O3 substrate (100 × 0.9 mm, single-polished) with two different catalysts. This method is inexpensive and compatible with the preparation of a wide variety of nanomaterials. Silver and gold nanopowders (99.99%, 50–100 nm) obtained from US Research Nanomaterials, Inc. Corporation (Houston, TX, USA) were used as catalysts. The sapphire substrates were cleaned using acetone and ethyl alcohol, rinsed with deionised water and dried with a nitrogen gun. A total of 0.2 grams of gallium (Ga), with a purity of 99.99% obtained from Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, was carefully dripped onto the polished surface of the sapphire substrate. After that, the catalyst nanopowder was added in varying amounts: 0, 5, 10 and 15 milligrams. For comparison, samples were grown under identical conditions on bare substrates. The samples were placed into a quartz crucible and then loaded into a Protherm laboratory tube furnace (model PTF 12/105/750) made in Turkey. This horizontal alumina tube furnace has a temperature range of up to 1200 °C, with a power of 3300 W and a current of 15 A. It operates at a frequency of 50–60 Hz and heating occurs in a 20 sccm nitrogen atmosphere. The oxygen required for Ga2O3 formation was sourced from residual oxygen present in the nitrogen atmosphere (20 sccm) within the tube furnace and from oxygen dissolved in the Ag and Au nanoparticles, which serve as oxygen reservoirs due to their high oxygen solubility [16,17]. An oxygen analyser (EO-W/1000, MTI Corporation, Richmond, CA, USA) was used to monitor the background oxygen concentration during the experiment. Figure 1 illustrates the sample set-up inside the furnace, which was used to grow gallium oxide on the alumina surface.

2.2. Characterisation Method

The surface morphological properties and elemental characterisation of the as-grown Ga2O3 thin films and nanorods were analysed by a Field Electron Scanning Electron microscope equipped with Energy-Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (FESEM-EDX). X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was conducted to identify the crystal nature of the material formed using a Rigaku MiniFlex-600 diffractometer with Cu Kα (λ = 0.15406 nm; 20–40 kV, 2–15 mA) from 10° to 70° two-theta (2θ) at the temperature of 21° in step-scan mode with a scanning rate of 1°/min.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

X-ray diffraction analysis was used to study the effect of different catalyst loadings during the preparation of Ga2O3 and the crystal quality of the thin films/nanorods grown on the sapphire substrate. The X-ray diffraction pattern (Figure 2) of gallium oxide crystals grown on sapphire surfaces at 800 °C with varying amounts of silver catalyst. The X-ray diffraction pattern clearly shows that the gallium oxide crystals grown on the surface of sapphire using Ag/Au as a catalyst are pure β-Ga2O3 without any other gallium oxide phases [18]. A preferential crystal growth in the 2 ¯ 01 direction can be observed with the increase in the amount of catalyst due to the preferred arrangement of oxygen atoms in the β-Ga2O3 2 ¯ 01 plane that is equivalent to sapphire (0001) [19]. No other peaks corresponding to different gallium oxide phase configurations were seen in the XRD spectrum.
Figure 3 shows the variation of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the 2 ¯ 01 diffraction peak of β-Ga2O3 with different catalyst loading. For the Ag catalyst, as the amount of Ag increased from 5 mg to 15 mg, an increase in the intensity of the 2 ¯ 01 diffraction peak and a decrease in the FWHM were observed. However, no clear trend was observed in the case of the Au catalyst.

3.2. Effect of Temperature on the Growth of Ga2O3 by FE-SEM Analysis

The temperature of the reaction medium significantly influences the kinetics mechanism of Ga2O3 nanoparticle growth. The physical properties, such as the solubility and diffusivity of oxygen molecules on metal nanoparticles, change with temperature. Specifically, the oxygen diffusion coefficients of Ag and Au nanoparticles are crucial in determining the growth density and length of Ga2O3 nanostructures. As the temperature increases, the diffusivity of oxygen molecules on these metal nanoparticles also increases, thereby promoting the growth of Ga2O3 nanostructures [8,20]. Similarly, the solubility of oxygen molecules in metal nanoparticles increases with temperature. At higher temperatures, the surface energy of nanoparticles increases, causing increased diffusion of gas molecules at the nanoparticle surfaces. Thus, increasing the surface area of nanoparticle droplets will lead to increased oxygen adsorption and diffusivity. In addition, it increases the mobility, agglomeration and distribution of NPs [18], leading to an increase in oxygen absorption.
The effect of temperature on the growth mechanism of Ga2O3 was studied by conducting the thermal oxidation process at 800 °C and 900 °C in the presence of Ag and Au nanoparticles (50–100 nm) deposited on the surface of liquid gallium. For the first time, an enhancement in the growth of Ga2O3 nanowires was observed during the thermal oxidation process. These results are consistent with the previous studies [12,21], highlighting the impact of catalytic effects at elevated temperatures. Figure 4 shows the SEM images of Ga2O3 nanostructures grown in the presence of metal nanoparticles at 800 °C and 900 °C for a duration of 45 min. The SEM image shows the growth of nanocrystalline grains coated with short nanostructures at 800 °C, whereas longer, denser and thinner nanowires were formed at 900 °C. This is due to the increased oxygen solubility of metal catalysts (i.e., Au or Ag) above its melting point. Even though the solubility of oxygen gases usually decreases in liquids with increasing temperature, for a few gases in some solvents and temperature ranges, solubility increases with an increase in temperature [22,23,24]. Silver exhibits high oxygen solubility at elevated temperatures, as reported by Ramanarayanan et al. [16], which enhances the availability of oxygen for Ga2O3 nucleation, contributing to the formation of denser and longer nanowires.
The variability in size and direction of β-Ga2O3 nanostructures observed in Figure 4 can be attributed to the self-diffusion of metal nanoparticles, leading to non-uniform catalyst distribution. To improve growth uniformity, techniques such as substrate pre-patterning via lithography or template-assisted deposition can be employed to control nanoparticle placement, as demonstrated in prior work with Ag-patterned quartz [8]. Additionally, optimizing substrate surface roughness and implementing precise control of oxygen flow during thermal evaporation could enhance directional growth and uniformity. These strategies will be investigated in future studies to achieve more consistent nanowire morphology.

3.3. Effect of Gallium Concentration on the Growth of Ga2O3 by FE-SEM

Gallium concentration is one of the critical factors controlling the growth of Ga2O3 nanostructures. Figure 5 and Figure 6 represent FESEM images of Ga2O3 nanostructure grown using Au NPs and Ag NPs, respectively. A common observation is that as the concentration of gallium increases, the density of Ga2O3 nanostructures increases. This is attributed to the higher tendency of gallium to react with oxygen. In addition, the presence of Ag or Au nanoparticles enhances the absorption capacity, leading to high-density nanostructures [16].
As the diffusion length of Ga increases with temperature, more Ga atoms diffuse to metal nanoparticles [25]. Consequently, liquid Ga extracts oxygen from the metal nanoparticles, which act as a reservoir of more oxygen at the interface, allowing it to react with Ga. This leads to the nucleation of Ga2O3 with high density at 800 °C. However, at 900 °C, Ga2O3 nanowires or nanosheets continue to grow as the diffusivity and solubility of oxygen molecules increase with temperature. This results in denser and longer nanowire (Figure 5 and Figure 6d) due to the supersaturation of various species. Annealing at 800 °C causes the metal catalysts to react with more residual oxygen molecules in the chamber, increasing the concentration of O2 in the metal [25]. At all temperatures, the oxidation enthalpy of Ga is much higher than that of Ag. Nucleation of Ga2O3 is expected to initiate on the metal nanoparticle surface, as observed in Figure 5a and Figure 6a for Au and Ag catalysts, respectively, at lower gallium concentrations and temperatures.
The presence of Ag or Au on the bare quartz and Ga enhances nucleation of Ga2O3. The kinetics and growth mechanism have been explained earlier in details [9]. Due to the self-diffusion of metal nanoparticles, more oxygen molecules will enhance the dissolution of gallium suboxide (Ga2O) in the liquid metal nanoparticles and deposit Gallium (III) oxide (Ga2O3) through crystal nucleation on the bare quartz by a vapor–liquid–solid (VLS) growth mechanism to increase the synthesis of Ga2O3 nanostructures [26].
The incorporation of Ag or Au catalysts enhances the growth process to a denser and longer β-Ga2O3 nanowires or nanostructures due to several factors that increase oxygen molecules in the system. For example, the solubility of O2 in Ag and Au [27] is much higher than the solubility of oxygen in liquid Ga molecules [28]. Furthermore, the oxygen molecules solubility in Ag nanoparticles are significantly increased by increasing the temperature at fixed pressure, leading to more oxygen molecules attraction to increase the growth of Ga2O3 nanostructures. Interestingly, the Ga atoms enthalpy is much more negative than that of the oxidation of Ag or Au, at all temperatures. This causes a constant nucleation of Ga2O3 nanostructures to occur on Ag-Ga-O liquid mixture, where Ga strips the dissolved O2 away from Ag nanoparticles liquid islands at the higher temperature.
At 800 °C, oxygen’s solubility in Ag nanoparticles is highly increased, leading to Ga2O3 nucleation as shown in Figure 7. However, at a higher temperature (1000 °C), the growth mechanism saturates when reaching equilibrium phase of AgGaOx (Ag-Ga-O phase diagram No. 209084) [29]. Consequently, a constant amount of Ga2O and O2 in the presence of Ag nanoparticles would raise the growth of Ga2O3.
Figure 8 shows the effect of various gallium concentrations at 800 °C in the presence of 10 mg of silver (Ag) nanoparticles. As the gallium concentration increases, the Ga2O3 nanowires becomes denser and thicker. This suggests that while the oxidation of metal nanoparticles enhances their attraction to oxygen molecules, a low concentration of gallium results in a lower density of Ga2O3 nanowires or nanosheets as previously observed by Yuan et al. [30].
Different diffusion mechanisms, influenced by metal nanoparticles such as Ag and Au NPs, facilitate Ga2O3 nanostructures growth. Self-diffusion affects nanoparticle distribution, with Ag NP surface diffusion exhibiting the lowest activation energy (0.39 eV) compared to grain boundary (0.99 eV) and volume diffusion (1.98 eV) [31], allowing rapid, unconstrained movement and surface distribution. As temperature rises, surface diffusion increases, spreading more nanoparticles and enhancing Ga2O3 nanostructure growth [32,33]. Figure 9 summarizes how metal nanoparticle catalysts yield denser and longer Ga2O3 nanostructures.

3.4. Effect of Catalyst Selection and Concentration on the Growth of Ga2O3 by FE-SEM Analysis

The ideal catalyst metal nanoparticles play a crucial role in enhancing the growth of Ga2O3 nanostructures. Figure 10 shows the growth of Ga2O3 at 800 °C with two different catalysts, Ag and Au nanoparticles, under identical conditions. A sheet-like continuous morphology was observed for the Ga2O3 sample grown with Au nanoparticles, whereas much denser and thicker crystalline structures were observed for samples grown with Ag nanoparticles. Silver’s higher oxygen solubility than gold makes it an effective catalyst for the growth of Ga2O3 nanostructures. In addition, silver has the lowest activation energy for surface diffusion (0.39 eV) compared to the activation energy of grain boundary diffusion (0.99 eV) and volume diffusion (1.98 eV) [12]. Hence, silver nanoparticles can interchange easily with no restriction when distributing at the surface. At low activation energy and high diffusion rate, the flux of atoms increases as the concentration gradient and temperature increase. As the temperature increases, the density of metal nanoparticles also increases [34]. However, grain boundary and surface diffusion are both expected in the oxidation process. Surface diffusion can be further increased as the duration of thermal annealing increases at a fixed temperature [32,33]. The final morphology of the Ga2O3 nanoparticles is determined by the shape and size of the initial Ga2O3 crystal nucleation sites [17,35].
To better understand the kinetics and mechanism of interaction between metal nanoparticles (Ag and Au) and oxygen molecules, FESEM images of Ga2O3 nanostructures grown at 900 °C and 1.5 g of gallium with different amounts of catalysts (5, 10 and 15 mg) were analysed (Figure 11). Ga2O3 samples grown in the presence of Au exhibited more nanosheet-like textures, whereas Ag nanoparticles change the morphology of Ga2O3 nanostructures and form longer and denser nanowires. Our research team was able to achieve enhanced nanowire growth while using Ag as a catalyst due to its superior oxygen diffusion capability compared to other catalysts at higher temperatures. The oxygen diffusion coefficient of silver nanoparticles is much higher than Au [12], making Ag the best catalyst for enhancing the growth density and length of Ga2O3 nanowires. Although the diffusivity of oxygen molecules in Au nanoparticles is higher than in Ag nanoparticles, the oxygen molecule concentration in silver nanoparticles is higher than in gold nanoparticles [12]. This is due to the transformation of interstitial sites of oxygen molecules into O-Ag oxide, reducing the possibility of oxygen diffusion in silver nanoparticles, reducing the diffusion of oxygen, whereas gold nanoparticles are not easily transformed into O-Au oxide, allowing for higher oxygen diffusion in Au. Additionally, as the metal nanoparticle concentration increased, higher-density and longer Ga2O3 nanowires were formed (Figure 11). This can be primarily attributed to the increased availability of oxygen due to the presence of more metal nanoparticles.
The growth of β-Ga2O3 nanostructures using Ag and Au catalysts exhibits distinct differences. Ag nanoparticles promote the formation of denser and longer nanowires, while Au nanoparticles favor nanosheet-like structures (Figure 10 and Figure 11). This is attributed to Ag’s higher oxygen solubility and diffusion coefficient compared to Au [12], leading to enhanced nucleation and growth of β-Ga2O3 nanowires. XRD analysis (Figure 2) confirms that Ag-catalyzed samples exhibit sharper diffraction peaks, indicating superior crystal quality. Additionally, Ag’s lower activation energy for surface diffusion (0.39 eV compared to 0.99 eV for Au [31]) facilitates more uniform nanoparticle distribution, improving growth uniformity and ease of control. Therefore, Ag is the preferred catalyst for achieving high-quality, uniform β-Ga2O3 nanowires.

3.5. Elemental Composition of Ga2O3 by EDS Analysis

Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) was used to perform elemental and chemical microanalysis on the samples. Figure 12 presents the FESEM-EDX spectra of Ga2O3 nanostructures grown on sapphire substrates at 800 °C and 900 °C, with and without Au or Ag catalysts, corresponding to the elemental compositions listed in Table 1. The spectra confirm higher oxygen concentrations at elevated temperatures and in the presence of catalysts, consistent with increased oxygen solubility in liquid gallium and metal nanoparticles [16,24,25].
Compared to previous studies [36,37,38], we were able to create longer and denser Ga2O3 nanowires (Table 2). A careful analysis of the length and morphology of Ga2O3 nanowires grown using Au and Ag catalysts revealed that only Ag nanoparticles formed longer nanowires.
Interestingly, the percentage of oxygen absorption is much higher in both catalysts. However, the morphology of Ga2O3 has exposed major differences in the growth shape and direction of Ga2O3. Ag NP catalysts form denser and longer distribution of Ga2O3 nanowires only. However, Au NP catalysts forms denser nanowires and nanoflakes as well. Consequently, the presence of Ag NPs shows a better growth process rather than the Au NP catalyst in terms of growth uniformity and ease of control.
More investigation is required to evaluate the unintentional residual impurities of Ga2O3 nanowires with catalyst Au and Ag during their growth process. The influence of these impurities on device performance also requires further study. Some procedural challenges for the growth of Ga2O3 nanostructures also need to be explained. For instance, more directional Ga2O3 nanowire growth is highly desirable and the nanowires should also be more uniform in size and length. Finally, techniques to pattern and etch the Ga2O3 nanowires would be highly valuable.
A STEM image of a bright field (BF) and high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) of a Ga2O3 nanowire grown at 1000 °C on uncoated quartz and on coated with 5 nm Ag thin film [9]. The bright field showed dark crystalline NPs due to diffraction contrast. Meanwhile, HAADF showed much brighter nanoparticles due to the z-contrast, suggesting that the presence of significant larger atomic mass and density than the adjacent β-Ga2O3, which points to Ag NPs. These Ag nanoparticles assist to synthesize β-Ga2O3 nanowires during the growth process and will be remain within the crystal lattice, exposing their size in the range of 1–5 nm [9] and it will be difficult to remove them.
Residual Ag and Au nanoparticles, ranging from 1–5 nm, are incorporated into the β-Ga2O3 nanowire lattice, as observed in STEM images. These impurities can enhance morphological, electrical and optical properties, such as bandgap and photoconductance, due to their catalytic role [9]. However, they may also introduce defects that could impact device performance, necessitating further investigation to quantify their concentration and effects. Techniques such as selective chemical etching or post-annealing in an inert atmosphere could be explored to minimize residual catalysts and improve nanowire purity.

4. Conclusions

Ga2O3 nanostructures grown on sapphire substrates using different catalysts (Au or Ag nanoparticles) were studied using X-ray diffraction analysis and FESEM-EDS to understand the growth mechanism, kinetics, and morphology of the nanostructures. The influence of different factors such as temperature, nature of the catalyst and concentration of the catalyst and Ga on the growth of Ga2O3 nanostructures were also studied using FESEM. The FESEM analysis showed the formation of more nucleation of Ga2O3 nanostructures at 800 °C, whereas much denser and longer nanowires and nanosheets were formed at 900 °C. The XRD results of the grown Ga2O3 on sapphire substrate show three sharp diffraction peaks located at 19.31°, 38.70° and 59.38° corresponding to 2 ¯ 01 ,   4 ¯ 02 and 6 ¯ 03 planes of β-Ga2O3 (JCPDS No. 43-1012). A high atomic percentage of oxygen in Ga2O3 nanostructures grown on sapphire surfaces was detected by EDS in samples exposed to high temperatures. This is due to the increased oxygen solubility in liquid gallium and metal nanoparticles, as well as the effects of self-diffusion. Using silver and gold as catalysts, we obtained β-Ga2O3 nanowires thinner than those grown with other catalysts, such as Ni [37], Pt [40] or Fe [41], demonstrating the superior control over nanowire morphology offered by Ag and Au nanoparticles. Ag nanoparticles, as a catalyst for Ga2O3 nanowire growth, lead to denser nanowires, while Au nanoparticles result in more nanosheet-like structures of Ga2O3. With these morphology and structural characteristics, the proposed technique shows great potential for applications in optoelectronic devices, sensors and high-power electronics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.A.; methodology, B.A.; validation, B.A.; investigation, B.A.; resources, L.A.-H.; data curation B.A., A.J., N.M.A., S.D. and A.A.A.-D.; writing—original draft preparation, B.A.; writing—review and editing, B.A., A.J., N.M.A. and S.D.; supervision, B.A.; project administration, B.A.; funding acquisition, B.A. and L.A.-H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, grant number “EA096K”.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR) for the research facilities and infrastructure for conducting the experiments described in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AAmpere
AgSilver
Al2O3Alumina
AuGold
CuCopper
EDXEnergy Dispersive X-ray
eVElectron volt
FE-SEMField Emission Scanning Electron Microscope
FWHMFull width at half maximum
GaGallium
Ga2O3Gallium oxide
HzHertz
JCPDSJoint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards
LEDsLight emitting diodes
NPsNanoparticles
OOxygen
SccmStandard cubic centimeters per minute
WWatts
XRDX-ray diffraction
λLambda

References

  1. Jamwal, N.S.; Kiani, A. Gallium Oxide Nanostructures: A Review of Synthesis, Properties and Applications. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chi, Z.; Asher, J.J.; Jennings, M.R.; Chikoidze, E.; Pérez-Tomás, A. Ga2O3 and Related Ultra-Wide Bandgap Power Semiconductor Oxides: New Energy Electronics Solutions for CO2 Emission Mitigation. Materials 2022, 15, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Luo, Z.; Xu, W.; Gong, H.; You, T.; Ou, X.; Ye, J.; Hao, Y.; Han, G. Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) heterogeneous and heterojunction power devices. Fundam. Res. 2023, 5, 804–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shi, Q.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Q.; Li, S.; Wang, W.; Fan, Q.; Zhang, J. Structural, optical and photoluminescence properties of Ga2O3 thin films deposited by vacuum thermal evaporation. J. Lumin. 2019, 206, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, J.; Yu, B.; Zhou, J. New Generation Beta-Gallium Oxide Nanomaterials: Growth and Performances in Electronic Devices. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023, 25, 2300688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alhalaili, B.; Al-Duweesh, A.; Popescu, I.N.; Vidu, R.; Vladareanu, L.; Islam, M.S. Improvement of Schottky Contacts of Gallium Oxide (Ga2O3) Nanowires for UV Applications. Sensors 2022, 22, 2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alhalaili, B.; Vidu, R.; Popescu, I.N.; Samyamanthula, D.R.; Islam, M.S. Novel Approach to Synthesize Nanostructured Gallium Oxide for Devices Operating in Harsh Environmental Conditions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alhalaili, B.; Bunk, R.; Vidu, R.; Islam, M.S. Dynamics Contributions to the Growth Mechanism of Ga2O3 Thin Film and NWs Enabled by Ag Catalyst. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alhalaili, B.; Bunk, R.J.; Mao, H.; Cansizoglu, H.; Vidu, R.; Woodall, J.; Islam, M.S. Gallium oxide nanowires for UV detection with enhanced growth and material properties. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Keerthana, C.S.; Nair, A.S.; George, P.; Unnikrishnan, N.V.; Ulahannan, J.P.; Saritha, A.C. Hydrothermally synthesized Ag decorated β-Ga2O3 heterostructures as low cost, reusable SERS substrates for the nanomolar detection of rhodamine 6G. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2023, 179, 111407. [Google Scholar]
  11. Woo, K.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, T.G. Highly transparent conductive Ag/Ga2O3 electrode for near-ultraviolet light-emitting diodes. Phys. Status Solidi A 2014, 211, 1760–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, Z.-Y.; Ma, Y.; Han, Q.-F.; Liu, Y.-L. Solubility, permeation, and capturing of impurity oxygen in Au/Ag: A comparative investigation from first-principles. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2016, 114, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jia, C.; Jeon, D.-W.; Xu, J.; Yi, X.; Park, J.-H.; Zhang, Y. Catalyst-Assisted Large-Area Growth of Single-Crystal β-Ga2O3 Nanowires on Sapphire Substrates by Metal–Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xu, S.; Liu, L.; Qu, G.; Zhang, X.; Jia, C.; Wu, S.; Ma, Y.; Lee, Y.J.; Wang, G.; Park, J.-H.; et al. Single β-Ga2O3 nanowire based lateral FinFET on Si. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022, 120, 153501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tang, M.; Ma, C.; Liu, L.; Tan, X.; Li, Y.; Lee, Y.J.; Wang, G.; Jeon, D.-W.; Park, J.-H.; Zhang, Y.; et al. β-Ga2O3 Air-Channel Field-Emission Nanodiode with Ultrahigh Current Density and Low Turn-On Voltage. Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 1769–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ramanarayanan, T.A.; Rapp, R.A. The diffusivity and solubility of oxygen in liquid tin and solid silver and the diffusivity. Metall. Trans. 1972, 3, 3239–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vogl, L.M.; Schweizer, P.; Richter, G.; Spiecker, E. Effect of size and shape on the elastic modulus of metal nanowires. MRS Adv. 2021, 6, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhuo, Y.; Chen, Z.; Tu, W.; Ma, X.; Pei, Y.; Wang, G. β-Ga2O3 versus ε-Ga2O3: Control of the crystal phase composition of gallium oxide thin film prepared by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 420, 802–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nakagomi, S.; Kokubun, Y. Crystal orientation of β-Ga2O3 thin films formed on c-plane and a-plane sapphire substrate. J. Cryst. Growth 2012, 349, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Afzal, A. β-Ga2O3 nanowires and thin films for metal oxide semiconductor gas sensors: Sensing mechanisms and performance enhancement strategies. J. Mater. 2019, 5, 542–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mroziński, J.; Bieńko, A.; Kopel, P.; Langer, V. Structure and magnetic properties of a trinuclear nickel(II) complex with benzenetricarboxylate bridge. Inorganica Chim. Acta 2008, 361, 3723–3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fabbro, M.R.a.P. The Difficulty of Working with Silver Alloys with a High Oxygen Content; Legor Group SpA: Bressanvido, Italy, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  23. Holmes, L.H. The solubility of gases in liquids. J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. White, J.L.; Orr, R.L.; Hultgren, R. The thermodynamic properties of silver-gold alloys. Acta Metall. 1957, 5, 747–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lindberg, C.; Whiticar, A.; Dick, K.A.; Sköld, N.; Nygård, J.; Bolinsson, J. Silver as Seed-Particle Material for GaAs Nanowires—Dictating Crystal Phase and Growth Direction by Substrate Orientation. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 2181–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nguyen, T.D.; Kim, E.T.; Dao, K.A. Ag nanoparticle catalyst based on Ga2O3/GaAs semiconductor nanowire growth by VLS method. J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. Electron. 2015, 26, 8747–8752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Assal, J.; Hallstedt, B.; Gauckler, L.J. Thermodynamic assessment of the silver-oxygen system. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1997, 80, 3054–3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zinkevich, M.; Aldinger, F. Thermodynamic assessment of the gallium-oxygen system. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2004, 87, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Soci, C.; Zhang, A.; Xiang, B.; Dayeh, S.A.; Aplin, D.P.R.; Park, J.; Bao, X.Y.; Lo, Y.H.; Wang, D. ZnO nanowire UV photodetectors with high internal gain. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 1003–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yuan, L.; Wang, Y.; Mema, R.; Zhou, G. Driving force and growth mechanism for spontaneous oxide nanowire formation during the thermal oxidation of metals. Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 2491–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Askeland, D.R.; Fulay, P.P.; Wright, W.J. The Science and Engineering of Materials, SI Edition; CL-Engineering: Muang Chonburi, Thailand, 2011; p. 944. [Google Scholar]
  32. Muller, C.M.; Spolenak, R. Microstructure evolution during dewetting in thin Au films. Acta Mater. 2010, 58, 6035–6045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Strobel, S.; Kirkendall, C.; Chang, J.-B.; Berggren, K.K. Sub-10 nm structures on silicon by thermal dewetting of platinum. Nanotechnology 2010, 21, 505301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yang, S.M.; Kim, S.R.N.; Youn, W.K.; Kim, C.S.; Kim, D.S.; Yi, K.W.; Hwang, N.M. Generation of Charged Nanoparticles During Thermal Evaporation of Silver at Atmospheric Pressure. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 8418–8423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, N.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, R.Q. Growth of nanowires. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2008, 60, 1–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, Y.T.; Park, J.; Choi, Y.S.; Ryu, H.; Lee, H.J. Temperature-Dependent Growth of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes in the Range 800−1100 °C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 7614–7618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chun, H.J.; Choi, Y.S.; Bae, S.Y.; Seo, H.W.; Hong, S.J.; Park, J.; Yang, H. Controlled Structure of Gallium Oxide Nanowires. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 9042–9046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pallister, P.J.; Buttera, S.C.; Barry, S.T. Self-seeding gallium oxide nanowire growth by pulsed chemical vapor deposition. Phys. Status Solidi A 2015, 212, 1514–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chang, K.W.; Wu, J.J. Low-temperature catalytic growth of beta-Ga2O3 nanowires using single organometallic precursor. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1838–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Song, P.Y.; Wu, Z.; Shen, X.; Kang, J.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, T.-Y. Self-consistent growth of single-crystalline ((2)over-bar01)beta-Ga2O3 nanowires using a flexible GaN seed nanocrystal. Crystengcomm 2017, 19, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kumar, S.; Sarau, G.; Tessarek, C.; Bashouti, M.Y.; Hähnel, A.; Christiansen, S.; Singh, R. Study of iron-catalysed growth of β-Ga2O3 nanowires and their detailed characterization using TEM, Raman and cathodoluminescence techniques. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2014, 47, 435101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Graphical illustration of sample set-up inside the furnace used for growing and studying the morphology of Ga2O3 using different catalysts.
Figure 1. Graphical illustration of sample set-up inside the furnace used for growing and studying the morphology of Ga2O3 using different catalysts.
Nanomaterials 15 01169 g001
Figure 2. XRD pattern of β-Ga2O3 nanowires grown on the surface of sapphire at 800 °C: (a) Ag NP catalyst, (b) Au NP catalyst.
Figure 2. XRD pattern of β-Ga2O3 nanowires grown on the surface of sapphire at 800 °C: (a) Ag NP catalyst, (b) Au NP catalyst.
Nanomaterials 15 01169 g002
Figure 3. FWHM of 2 ¯ 01 diffraction peak of β-Ga2O3 with different catalyst loading at 800 °C: (a) Ag catalyst, (b) Au catalyst.
Figure 3. FWHM of 2 ¯ 01 diffraction peak of β-Ga2O3 with different catalyst loading at 800 °C: (a) Ag catalyst, (b) Au catalyst.
Nanomaterials 15 01169 g003
Figure 4. Effect of the oxidation temperature on the growth of Ga2O3 in the presence of Au NPs (a) at 800 °C; (b) at 900 °C and in the presence of Ag NPs (c) at 800 °C; (d) at 900 °C.
Figure 4. Effect of the oxidation temperature on the growth of Ga2O3 in the presence of Au NPs (a) at 800 °C; (b) at 900 °C and in the presence of Ag NPs (c) at 800 °C; (d) at 900 °C.
Nanomaterials 15 01169 g004
Figure 5. FESEM Images of Ga2O3 nanostructures grown using Au. (a,b) Low Ga concentration at 800 °C and 900 °C. (c,d) High Ga concentration at 800 °C and 900 °C.
Figure 5. FESEM Images of Ga2O3 nanostructures grown using Au. (a,b) Low Ga concentration at 800 °C and 900 °C. (c,d) High Ga concentration at 800 °C and 900 °C.
Nanomaterials 15 01169 g005
Figure 6. FESEM Images of Ga2O3 nanostructure grown using Ag. (a,b) Low Ga concentration at 800 °C and 900 °C. (c,d) High Ga concentration at 800 °C and 900 °C.
Figure 6. FESEM Images of Ga2O3 nanostructure grown using Ag. (a,b) Low Ga concentration at 800 °C and 900 °C. (c,d) High Ga concentration at 800 °C and 900 °C.
Nanomaterials 15 01169 g006
Figure 7. FESEM image of Ga2O3 nucleation grown using Ga is ~1.03 g and (a) 10 mg Au NPs and (b) Ag NPs at 800 °C.
Figure 7. FESEM image of Ga2O3 nucleation grown using Ga is ~1.03 g and (a) 10 mg Au NPs and (b) Ag NPs at 800 °C.
Nanomaterials 15 01169 g007
Figure 8. FESEM images of Ga2O3 nanostructures grown in the presence of 10 mg of Ag NPs at 800 °C. (a) 0.5 g of Ga; (b) 1.0 g of Ga; (c) 1.5 g of Ga.
Figure 8. FESEM images of Ga2O3 nanostructures grown in the presence of 10 mg of Ag NPs at 800 °C. (a) 0.5 g of Ga; (b) 1.0 g of Ga; (c) 1.5 g of Ga.
Nanomaterials 15 01169 g008
Figure 9. A schematic that summarizes the growth mechanism to obtain denser and longer Ga2O3 nanostructures in the presence of metal nanoparticles catalyst such as Au NPs or Ag NPs.
Figure 9. A schematic that summarizes the growth mechanism to obtain denser and longer Ga2O3 nanostructures in the presence of metal nanoparticles catalyst such as Au NPs or Ag NPs.
Nanomaterials 15 01169 g009
Figure 10. FESEM images of Ga2O3 nanostructures grown at 800 °C with 1.5 g of Ga and 5 mg of catalyst. (a) Au NPs. (b) Ag NPs.
Figure 10. FESEM images of Ga2O3 nanostructures grown at 800 °C with 1.5 g of Ga and 5 mg of catalyst. (a) Au NPs. (b) Ag NPs.
Nanomaterials 15 01169 g010
Figure 11. FESEM images of Ga2O3 nanostructures grown at 900 °C with 1.5 g of Ga and different catalyst concentrations. (a) 5 mg of Au, (b) 10 mg of Au, (c) 15 mg of Au, (d) 5 mg of Ag, (e) 10 mg of Ag and (f) 15 mg of Ag.
Figure 11. FESEM images of Ga2O3 nanostructures grown at 900 °C with 1.5 g of Ga and different catalyst concentrations. (a) 5 mg of Au, (b) 10 mg of Au, (c) 15 mg of Au, (d) 5 mg of Ag, (e) 10 mg of Ag and (f) 15 mg of Ag.
Nanomaterials 15 01169 g011
Figure 12. FESEM-EDS images of Ga2O3 nanostructure grown using Au NPs and Ag NPs. The left column at 800 °C and the right column at 900 °C; (a,f) are without catalyst; (b,g) shows Ga2O3 nanostructure grown using Ga is ~1.03 g and 10 mg Au NPs; (c,h) shows Ga2O3 nanostructure grown using Ga is ~1.5 g and 10 mg Au NPs; (d,i) show Ga2O3 nanostructure grown using Ga is ~1.03 g and 10 mg Ag NPs; (e,j) show Ga2O3 nanostructure grown using Ga is ~1.5 g and 10 mg Ag NPs.
Figure 12. FESEM-EDS images of Ga2O3 nanostructure grown using Au NPs and Ag NPs. The left column at 800 °C and the right column at 900 °C; (a,f) are without catalyst; (b,g) shows Ga2O3 nanostructure grown using Ga is ~1.03 g and 10 mg Au NPs; (c,h) shows Ga2O3 nanostructure grown using Ga is ~1.5 g and 10 mg Au NPs; (d,i) show Ga2O3 nanostructure grown using Ga is ~1.03 g and 10 mg Ag NPs; (e,j) show Ga2O3 nanostructure grown using Ga is ~1.5 g and 10 mg Ag NPs.
Nanomaterials 15 01169 g012
Table 1. The elemental composition of Ga2O3 nanostructures grown on sapphire substrates at 800 °C or 900 °C. (a) without a catalyst; (b) with Au or Ag catalyst.
Table 1. The elemental composition of Ga2O3 nanostructures grown on sapphire substrates at 800 °C or 900 °C. (a) without a catalyst; (b) with Au or Ag catalyst.
Temperatures800 °C900 °C
(a)
Elemental compositions (at. %) GaOGaO
No catalyst32.967.136.663.4
(b)
Elemental Composition (at. %)GaOAg/AuGaOAg/Au
1.03 g Ga and 10 mg Au74.225.40.456.343.70.0
1.5 g Ga and 10 mg Ag u77.322.70.055.044.80.2
1.03 g Ga and 10 mg Au73.224.91.954.444.31.3
1.5 g Ga and 10 mg Ag78.121.70.265.833.01.1
Table 2. The average diameter, length and morphology of the nanowires were measured for 10 samples and the results were compared with those reported in the literature based on the different catalysts, techniques and substrates used.
Table 2. The average diameter, length and morphology of the nanowires were measured for 10 samples and the results were compared with those reported in the literature based on the different catalysts, techniques and substrates used.
CatalystTechniqueSubstrateAverage Nanostructures
DiameterLength
Experimental Results (this work)
AuOxidationSapphire2–4 µm15–25 µm
Ag0.5–1.0 µm>20 µm
NPsRef.Reported Results
Free-Catalyst[38]CVDGa/Ga2O3 mixture and O240–70 nm10–20 µm
[37]Si/SiO2 & Al2O350-75 nm>10 µm
Ag NPs[26]Sol-gel and VLSGaAs18 to 30 nmseveral 10s of nm
to a few 100 µm
Au NPs[39]Thermal-VLSAu pre-treated on Si34 nm20 to 60 nm
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alhalaili, B.; Joseph, A.; Al-Hajji, L.; Ali, N.M.; Dean, S.; Al-Duweesh, A.A. Growth and Characterization of Ga2O3 for Power Nanodevices Using Metal Nanoparticle Catalysts. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151169

AMA Style

Alhalaili B, Joseph A, Al-Hajji L, Ali NM, Dean S, Al-Duweesh AA. Growth and Characterization of Ga2O3 for Power Nanodevices Using Metal Nanoparticle Catalysts. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(15):1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151169

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alhalaili, Badriyah, Antony Joseph, Latifa Al-Hajji, Naser M. Ali, Sowmya Dean, and Ahmad A. Al-Duweesh. 2025. "Growth and Characterization of Ga2O3 for Power Nanodevices Using Metal Nanoparticle Catalysts" Nanomaterials 15, no. 15: 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151169

APA Style

Alhalaili, B., Joseph, A., Al-Hajji, L., Ali, N. M., Dean, S., & Al-Duweesh, A. A. (2025). Growth and Characterization of Ga2O3 for Power Nanodevices Using Metal Nanoparticle Catalysts. Nanomaterials, 15(15), 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151169

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop