Spin-Orbit-Coupling-Governed Optical Absorption in Bilayer MoS₂ via Strain, Twist, and Electric Field Engineering

Abstract

This paper investigates strain-, twist-, and electric-field-tuned optical absorption in bilayer MoS₂, emphasizing spin-orbit coupling (SOC). A continuum model reveals competing mechanisms: geometric perturbations (strain/twist) and Stark effects govern one-/two-photon absorption, with critical thresholds (~9% strain, ~2.13° twist) switching spin-independent to spin-polarized regimes. Strain gradients and twist enhance nonlinear responses through symmetry-breaking effects while electric fields dynamically modulate absorption via band alignment tuning. By linking parameter configurations to absorption characteristics, this work provides a framework for designing tunable spin-resolved optoelectronic devices and advancing light–matter control in 2D materials.

1. Introduction

Since the discovery of graphene in 2004, its exceptional physical properties, including ultrahigh carrier mobility and optical transparency, have attracted extensive attention [1,2,3]. However, the zero-bandgap nature of graphene fundamentally limits its applications in optoelectronic devices. This limitation has driven the exploration of novel two-dimensional (2D) materials with tunable bandgaps, such as black phosphorus, transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), and silicene [4,5]. Among these, TMDCs represented by MoS₂ have emerged as promising candidates for next-generation electronics and photonics due to their semiconducting characteristics and strong spin-orbit coupling effects [6,7,8,9,10]. The sizeable bandgap of TMDCs effectively addresses graphene’s shortcomings in electronic and optoelectronic applications [11,12], positioning them as leading post-graphene materials for advanced device engineering [13,14,15,16,17].

The performance of optoelectronic devices critically depends on photon absorption efficiency and energy conversion capabilities, processes governed by interband transitions. This underscores the importance of precisely regulating the band structures of TMDCs to manipulate their optical absorption coefficients. The weak interlayer van der Waals interactions in TMDCs enable flexible structural modifications through twisting, straining, and electric field strength [18,19]. Unlike twisted graphene, where flat bands emerge only at specific “magic angles”, bilayer TMDCs exhibit flat band features across a broader angular range (<7°) [18,20], making them ideal platforms for achieving strong optical transition resonances [21,22]. Experimental studies have demonstrated that strain engineering can significantly enhance photoluminescence (PL) intensity in bilayer MoS₂ [23] while localized strain gradients induce symmetry-breaking effects that generate pronounced nonlinear optical responses [24]. These findings suggest that the synergistic application of twist, strain, and electric fields could provide unprecedented control over MoS₂’s optical absorption properties. Nevertheless, systematic theoretical investigations remain scarce regarding how these parameters, particularly under SOC considerations, influence one-photon absorption (OPA) and two-photon absorption (TPA) coefficients in MoS₂ systems.

Addressing this critical knowledge gap, we employ a low-energy continuum model to comprehensively investigate the strain-, twist-, and electricfield strength-mediated modulation of OPA/TPA coefficients in bilayer MoS₂ with the explicit consideration of SOC contributions. Our methodology involves the following: (1) calculating bandgap evolution under various strain ε, twist angle θ, and external electric field strength (E.F.) configurations; (2) applying second-order perturbation theory to quantify SOC-modified transition matrix elements; and (3) establishing quantitative relationships between external parameters and absorption coefficients through microscopic mechanism analysis. This work reveals three key advancements: first, the identification of competing modulation mechanisms between geometric perturbations (θ, ε) and Stark effects in controlling absorption characteristics; second, the discovery of critical thresholds (ε_c ≈ 9%, θ_c ≈ 2.13°) governing transitions between spin-independent and spin-polarized absorption regimes; third, the demonstration of quantum interference effects through Berry curvature engineering under strain gradients. These findings not only deepen our understanding of light–matter interactions in 2D materials but also establish a theoretical framework for designing tunable photonic devices with spin-resolved functionalities.

2. Theory

This paper focuses on MoS₂ as a representative system of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides MX₂ (M = Mo/W; X = S/Se). Given their similar structural features and physical properties, the results could also be validated for other TMDCs. As illustrated in Figure 1a, monolayer MoS₂ exhibits a hexagonal lattice structure, where each Mo atom is coordinated with six S atoms in a trigonal prismatic geometry, belonging to the D_3h space group. The electronic structure, shown in Figure 1b, features Fermi levels located at two inequivalent valleys (K₀ and −K₀) in the Brillouin zone. While this valley degeneracy resembles graphene, MoS₂ exhibits a distinct direct bandgap of approximately 1.66 eV. First-principles calculations combined with parameter fitting [25] reveal that the conduction band minimum (CBM) and valence band maximum (VBM) are primarily dominated by the Mo-derived d_3z²−r² and d_x²−y² ± id_xy orbitals, respectively, with significant hybridization from the S atom p_x ± ip_y orbitals in both bands.

Compared to graphene, the electronic structure of MoS₂ exhibits two notable characteristics. First, strong SOC arises from the metal d-orbital contributions. Specifically, the VBM at the K₀ valley undergoes spin splitting with a magnitude of 2λ = 0.15 eV [25] while the CBM remains spin-degenerate due to the 2dz² orbital symmetry (Figure 1b). Second, time-reversal symmetry enforces mirror-symmetric spin polarization between the K₀ and −K₀ valleys. To model these effects, we adopt a graphene-inspired staggered sublattice potential Hamiltonian [26,27] and incorporate SOC corrections originating from intra-atomic L·S interactions. The effective Hamiltonian for monolayer MoS₂ is expressed thus:

$$h(\mathbf{k})=at(\xi k_x{\sigma }_x+k_y{\sigma }_y)+\frac{\mathrm{\Delta }}{2}{\sigma }_z-\lambda \xi \frac{({\sigma }_z-1)}{2}{s}_z,$$

(1)

Here, σ denotes the Pauli matrices and valley index ξ = ±1. Key parameters include the lattice constant a = 3.193 Å, effective hopping integral t = 1.10 eV, bandgap Δ = 1.66 eV, and SOC strength λ = 0.075 eV (yielding 2λ = 0.15 eV splitting), which follows first-principles calculations [25]. Notably, the conservation of spin quantum number (s_z = ±1 for spin-up/down states) ensures the complete decoupling of spin channels in the Hamiltonian, significantly simplifying subsequent theoretical analyses.

We begin with a 2H-stacked bilayer MoS₂ system and introduce strain and twist degrees of freedom to construct a deformed bilayer structure. As demonstrated in Figure 1c, when two 2D material layers exhibit a lattice-constant mismatch or twist angle, they form a moiré superlattice—a long-wavelength interference pattern with a periodicity much larger than the original atomic lattice spacing [18]. Let a₁ = a (1, 0) and a₂ = a (1/2, $\sqrt{3}$/2) denote the primitive lattice vectors, with corresponding reciprocal lattice vectors b₁ = 2π/a (1, –1/$\sqrt{3}$) and b₂ = 2π/a (0, 2/$\sqrt{3}$). The two inequivalent Dirac points in the first Brillouin zone are located at K_ξ = −ξ(4π/3a, 0). The combined deformation matrix U associated with the small angle rotation matrix R(θ) and the strain tensor S(ε, φ) is expressed thus [28,29]:

$$\begin{array}{ll}U(\epsilon ,\phi ,\theta )& =S(\epsilon ,\phi )+R(\theta )\\ & =\epsilon \left(\begin{array}{cc}co{s}^2\phi -\upsilon si{n}^2\phi & (1+\upsilon )cos\phi sin\phi \\ (1+\upsilon )cos\phi sin\phi & si{n}^2\phi -\upsilon co{s}^2\phi \end{array}\right)+\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& -\theta \\ \theta & 0\end{array}\right)\\ & =\left(\begin{array}{cc}{\epsilon }_{xx}& {\epsilon }_{xy}-\theta \\ {\epsilon }_{xy}+\theta & {\epsilon }_{yy}\end{array}\right)\end{array}$$

(2)

Here, $\upsilon$ = 0.25 [30] is the Poisson ratio. The introduction of strain and twist breaks the original lattice symmetry, modifying the lattice vectors $a_i^l$ and reciprocal vectors $b_i^l$ for l layer (i = 1, 2) as

$${\mathbf{a}}_i^l=(\mathbf{I}+U_l){\mathbf{a}}_i,$$

(3)

where the relative deformation matrix satisfies U₂ = −U₁ = U/2 due to symmetry constraints. This deformation shifts the Dirac points and generates a moiré Brillouin zone, as illustrated in Figure 1d. The corresponding lattice vectors ${\mathbf{a}}_i^{\mathrm{M}}={\mathbf{a}}_i^1-{\mathbf{a}}_i^2=U^{-1}{\mathbf{a}}_i$ and reciprocal lattice vectors ${\mathbf{b}}_i^{\mathrm{M}}={\mathbf{b}}_i^1-{\mathbf{b}}_i^2=U^T{\mathbf{b}}_i$ of the moiré superlattice are derived accordingly. The strained Dirac point positions are determined by

$${\mathbf{K}}_{\xi }=(\mathbf{I}-U^T){\mathbf{K}}_{0\xi }-\xi \mathbf{G},$$

(4)

where $\mathbf{G}=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2a}\beta ({\epsilon }_{xx}-{\epsilon }_{yy},-2{\epsilon }_{xy})$; the effective gauge connection for the low energy Dirac fermions with the hopping modulus factor β ≈ 2.4 for MoS₂ [31] represents the dimensionless hopping modulus factor characterizing the strain response of low-energy Dirac fermions.

The Hamiltonian of the bilayer MoS₂ system adopts formalism analogous to that of bilayer graphene [28,29]:

$$H=\left(\begin{array}{cc}{h}_1(\mathbf{k})+V_1(\mathbf{r})& T(\mathbf{r})\\ T^{†}(\mathbf{r})& h_2(\mathbf{k})+V_2(\mathbf{r})\end{array}\right),$$

(5)

Here, the intralayer coupling terms $h_l(\mathbf{k})=at[(\mathbf{I}+U_l^T-\beta S_l)(\mathbf{k}-{\mathbf{K}}_{l\xi })\cdot (\xi {\sigma }_x,{\sigma }_y)]+\frac{\mathrm{\Delta }}{2}{\sigma }_z-\lambda \xi \frac{({\sigma }_z-1)}{2}{s}_z$ are derived by applying the deformation matrix U to the monolayer Hamiltonian in Equation (1) [30]. The potential V_l(r) accounts for moiré superlattice-induced intralayer modulations. Crucially, since the intralayer coupling parameters are orders of magnitude weaker than their interlayer counterparts, we set V_l(r) = 0 in this model. The interlayer coupling term T(r) is expressed thus [28]:

$$T(\mathbf{r})={\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{3}t(\mathbf{k})}{e}^{i{\mathbf{b}}_n^{\mathrm{M}}\cdot \mathbf{r}}$$

(6)

For computational implementation, we fix the interlayer spacing of bilayer MoS₂ at 0.301 nm. The S-S interlayer hopping parameter t(k) is truncated at a maximum value of 10 meV to ensure computational tractability while preserving essential physical features [32].

When a uniform vertical electric field with strength E.F. is applied to the material, an interlayer energy offset Π = ed∙(E.F.) with electron charge e and d the thickness of the bilayer system is induced between the two layers. Consequently, the system Hamiltonian in Equation (5) requires modification by adding and subtracting Π/2 to and from the diagonal elements, respectively.

In crystalline solids, multiphoton absorption (MPA) processes can be described through time-dependent perturbation theory. For OPA, an electron in the ground state absorbs one photon of energy ħω and transitions to an excited state. The transition rate W₁ for OPA in two-dimensional materials is derived from second-order perturbation theory as [33]

$$W_1=\frac{2\pi }{\mathit{ħ}}{\int \left|〈{\phi }_f\left|H_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}}\right|{\phi }_i〉\right|}^2\delta (E_f-E_i-\mathit{ħ}\omega )\frac{d^2\mathbf{k}}{{(2\pi )}^2},$$

(7)

where φ_i and φ_f represent the initial and final state wavefunctions, E_i and E_f are their corresponding energies, and the Dirac delta function enforces energy conservation. The electron-radiation interaction Hamiltonian is H_int = eħ/(m_ec)A∙k, with effective mass m_e, speed of light in vacuum c, and light wave vector potential A = Ae. The OPA coefficient α₁ relates to the transition rate W₁ through

$${\alpha }_1={\displaystyle \frac{2W_1\mathit{ħ}\omega }{Id}},$$

(8)

where I = ε_ω^1/2ω²A²(2πc)⁻¹ is the incident light intensity; ε_ω the optical-frequency dielectric constant. For TPA, the process involves sequential absorption of two photons via intermediate states. The TPA transition rate W₂ is expressed as [33]

$$\begin{gathered} W_2=\frac{2\pi }{\mathit{ħ}}{\int \left|M_{f,i}\right|}^2\delta (E_f-E_i-2\mathit{ħ}\omega )\frac{{\mathrm{d}}^2\mathbf{k}}{{(2\pi )}^2}, \\ {M}_{f,i}=\sum _m\frac{〈{\phi }_f\left|H_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}}\right|{\phi }_m〉〈{\phi }_m\left|H_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}}\right|{\phi }_i〉}{E_m-E_i-\mathit{ħ}\omega }, \end{gathered}$$

(9)

where φ_m and E_m correspond to intermediate states and energies. The TPA coefficient α₂ follows:

$${\alpha }_2={\displaystyle \frac{2W_2\mathit{ħ}\omega }{I^{2}d}}$$

(10)

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Band Structure Modulation Mechanisms

In photon absorption processes, the probability and efficiency of electron transitions from the valence band to the conduction band are fundamentally governed by the material’s band topology. Therefore, a systematic investigation of the synergistic modulation effects induced by strain magnitude ε, twist angle θ, and external electric field strength E.F. on the band structure is critical. Guided by the D_3h point group symmetry of the system, we focus on the electronic state evolution at the ξ = −1 valley.

As illustrated in Figure 2a, SOC induces spin-polarized splitting at the VBM of the twisted bilayer system, forming spin-up and spin-down subbands with an energy splitting of Δ_SOC ≈ 0.15 eV. This phenomenon arises from the SOC-mediated orbital-momentum locking effect, which lifts the spin degeneracy by breaking spatial inversion symmetry [20]. The bandgap δ_k at the K point exhibits distinct nonlinear behavior under the combined modulation of strain magnitude ε and twist angle θ (Figure 2b). In the low-strain regime (ε < 6%), δ_k increases monotonically with θ, attributed to enhanced wavefunction localization caused by the attenuation of interlayer orbital coupling strength. In the high-strain regime (ε ≥ 6%): δ_k becomes robust against θ variations due to strain-driven lattice relaxation dominating band renormalization processes. The energy bands near the Fermi level undergo significant restructuring under θ and ε modulation (Figure 2c,d). This originates from the spatial confinement effects of moiré superlattice potentials: Increasing θ enhances wavefunction localization within moiré periodic potentials while ε modifies Brillouin zone symmetry to shift van Hove singularity positions. Notably, these geometric perturbations primarily redistribute carriers rather than altering the intrinsic bandgap, enabling the independent control of optical absorption spectra and electronic band alignment.

In contrast, vertical electric fields modulate δ_k through Stark-effect-driven interlayer charge transfer (Figure 2e). δ_k decreases linearly with external electric field strength, culminating in a semiconductor-to-metal transition at 0.29 V/Å, where interlayer tunneling dominates transport [34,35,36]. When field increases to 0.32 V/Å, this confirms SOC-enhanced field sensitivity via effective mass reduction [20]. This dimension-dependent regulatory disparity highlights distinct mechanisms: electric fields directly modify band alignment through electrostatic potentials while geometric perturbations (θ, ε) govern electronic correlations via orbital hybridization tuning.

3.2. Single-Photon Absorption Coefficient

As shown in Figure 3, the SOC induces the characteristic splitting of the one-photon absorption coefficient α₁ in twisted bilayer MoS₂, generating dual absorption peaks flanking the SOC-free central peak. This phenomenon originates from the spin-selective transitions governed by the hybridization of Mo’s d_{x² − y²} ± idxy orbitals at the valence band maximum, which lifts spin degeneracy through broken inversion symmetry [37]. The absorption coefficient reaches magnitudes of 10⁵ m⁻¹, with both peak intensity and spectral width exhibiting strong dependence on twist angle θ and strain ε. Specifically, increasing θ from 1.7° to 2.3° enhances α₁ by amplifying the moiré-potential localization effect-reduced interlayer coupling strengthens wavefunction confinement, thereby increasing the density of states near van Hove singularities (Figure 2c,d). This geometric modulation simultaneously widens absorption peaks (FWHM expansion > 30%) due to enhanced band nesting effects. Strain engineering (ε > 6%) further elevates α₁ through Brillouin-zone-compression-induced band restructuring [28], which modifies momentum conservation rules and activates normally forbidden interband transitions. Notably, spin-down absorption channels dominate under high θ/ε conditions, approaching the absorption intensity of SOC-free systems (Figure 3d), a consequence of strain-mediated C₃ symmetry breaking that preferentially enhances dipole matrix elements for spin-down transitions. The decoupled control capabilities, θ controlling spin polarization via spatial carrier localization and ε tuning spectral response through symmetry relaxation, establish a dual-parameter strategy for designing polarization-sensitive photonic devices with customized absorption profiles.

Systematic investigations reveal a nonlinear evolution of the one-photon absorption coefficient α₁ in bilayer MoS₂ across the strain-twist angle parameter space (Figure 4). For systems with twist angles of 1.85°, 2°, and 2.13°, α₁ exhibits a biphasic response as ε increases from 0% to 10%, initial enhancement followed by suppression. The critical strain ε_c corresponding to peak α₁ demonstrates θ-dependent shifts: ε_c = 10% for θ = 1.85° while ε_c = 6% for θ = 2° and 2.13° (Figure 4d). This phenomenon originates from the competing modulation effects of strain and the twist angle on interlayer coupling—strain enhances transition matrix elements through Brillouin zone compression whereas excessive strain (ε > ε_c) disrupts interlayer orbital hybridization, leading to suppressed absorption. The observed angular dependence of ε_c highlights the geometric frustration between moiré periodicity and lattice deformation at different twist configurations.

The one-photon absorption coefficient exhibits exceptional sensitivity to vertical electric fields, as demonstrated in Figure 5. Upon the application of E.F. = 0.1 V/Å, α₁ decreases by two orders of magnitude (from 10⁶ cm⁻¹ to 10⁴ cm⁻¹) accompanied by a pronounced redshift. This phenomenon originates from the interlayer Stark effect induced by the electric field, where the theoretical prediction of redshift magnitude aligns closely with experimental observations [20]. The bandgap reduction (Figure 2f) lowers the photon energy required for resonant transitions, resulting in systematic absorption peak redshift. Concurrently, bandgap narrowing significantly suppresses the interband transition probability. Here, electric-field-induced wavefunction delocalization attenuates the momentum matrix element while the density of states within individual bands (conduction/valence) remains stable (Figure 2d). These combined effects drive the exponential attenuation of α₁ with an increasing external electric field.

3.3. Two-Photon Absorption Coefficient

The two-photon absorption coefficient α₂ exhibits unique response characteristics under the modulation of strain or twist angle, as shown in Figure 6. Distinct from one-photon absorption, α₂ undergoes a critical transition at θ = 2°, where spin-down and spin-up absorption intensities become equal while both remain lower than the spin-independent case. Beyond this critical angle, pronounced spin polarization emerges with an increasing θ. This phenomenon originates from the competition between interlayer coupling strength and moiré superlattice potentials. Strain modulation demonstrates a threshold-dependent behavior. For ε < 6%, spin-up, spin-down, and spin-independent absorption coefficients remain comparable. When ε > 6%, α₂ increases linearly with strain, accompanied by enhanced spin polarization. The observed absorption peak broadening correlates directly with the density of states dispersion shown in Figure 2, confirming that geometric perturbations amplify interband scattering rates, thereby expanding the two-photon resonance window. This synergistic control of spectral broadening and spin polarization establishes new degrees of freedom for developing ultrafast spintronic–photonic devices.

The two-photon absorption coefficient α₂ exhibits multi-extremal response characteristics under the synergistic modulation of strain and the twist angle, as illustrated in Figure 7. For the system with θ = 1.85° and ε = 10%, the spin-independent α₂ reaches a maximum value of 9 × 10⁻⁹ m/W, attributed to strain-enhanced interlayer hybridization. Notably, at θ = 2°, the spin-down absorption channel matches the spin-independent case when ε = 8%, whereas increasing ε to 10% causes the spin-up absorption to surpass the spin-independent value. This reveals the strain-mediated preferential enhancement of specific spin channels through C₃ symmetry breaking. For the θ = 2.13° system, spin-independent absorption dominates at ε = 8%, but at ε = 10%, the spin-up absorption equals the spin-independent value while remaining lower than the spin-down counterpart. This indicates a critical strain threshold of approximately 9%, beyond which spin-polarized absorption prevails. Full parameter-space analysis demonstrates the systematic enhancement of α₂ across the 1375–1649 nm wavelength range with increasing ε. This strain–twist synergy establishes a theoretical framework for designing wavelength-tunable two-photon detectors. Optimal absorption at the 1550 nm telecommunication window can be achieved through strategic θ-ε parameter matching.

Figure 8a,b illustrate the evolution of the two-photon absorption coefficient α₂ with vertical electric field strength in twisted bilayer MoS₂ systems at angles of θ = 2.13° and 3.15°. The pronounced modulation of the bandgap by electric field drives a highly nonlinear response in α₂. As external electric field increases from 0.01 to 0.05 V/Å, α₂ decreases by approximately one order of magnitude (e.g., from 3.6 × 10⁻¹² m/W to 0.5 × 10⁻¹² m/W for θ = 2.13°), accompanied by a redshift of the absorption peak. Notably, the attenuation of α₂ exhibits nonmonotonic behavior—an anomalous enhancement observed at specific electric field strength values. This phenomenon is attributed to the electric-field-driven redistribution of electron density between layers, which modifies the energy distribution of intermediate states in the two-photon transition matrix element. Furthermore, the redshift rate correlates strongly with the bandgap contraction rate, consistent with theoretical predictions of the Stark effect [20]. We have compiled and compared the currently reported experimental and theoretical data on two-photon absorption in MoS₂ (see

Table 1. TPA coefficient of MoS₂ using this theory and other theories, as well as experimental data for comparison.

Thickness	Electric Field (V/Å)	Twist Angle (Degree)	Strain Magnitude (%)	Wavelength (nm)	β (Experiment) (m/W)	β (Other Theory) (m/W)	β (This Theory) (m/W)
ML-MoS2	0	0	0	1030	(7.62 ± 0.15) × 10−8 [38]
ML-MoS2	0	0	0	800		8 × 10−9 [39]
ML-MoS2	0	0	0	780		7.47 × 10−11 [40]
ML-MoS2	0	0	0	1030		4.2 × 10−11 [40]
50.0 ± 0.75 (nm)	0	0	0	1030	(4.99 ± 0.02) × 10−9 [41]
25–27 layers	0	0	0	800	(6.6 ± 0.4) × 10−10 [42]
25–27 layers	0	0	0	1030	(1.14 ± 4.3) × 10−10 [42]
BL-MoS2	0	1.7	0	1506 ± 60			0.1 × 10−11
BL-MoS2	0	2.3	0	1506 ± 60			1.55 × 10−11
BL-MoS2	0	0	6	1506 ± 60			0.1 × 10−11
BL-MoS2	0	0	10	1506 ± 60			2.0 × 10−11
BL-MoS2	0	1.85	2	1469 ± 60			0.1 × 10−9
BL-MoS2	0	1.85	10	1469 ± 60			0.85 × 10−9
BL-MoS2	0.01	2.13	0	1627			3.62 × 10−12
BL-MoS2	0.05	2.13	0	1902			0.46 × 10−12
BL-MoS2	0.01	3.15	0	1623			1.62 × 10−11
BL-MoS2	0.05	3.15	0	1914			2.27 × 10−11

), providing a reference for related experimental studies and practical applications.

4. Conclusions

This paper has comprehensively investigated the synergistic modulation of optical absorption properties in bilayer MoS₂ under strain, the twist angle, and vertical electric fields, with the explicit consideration of spin-orbit coupling (SOC) effects. The interplay between geometric perturbations (strain and twist) and Stark effects reveals competing mechanisms for controlling spectral response and spin polarization. Critical thresholds (ε_c ≈ 9%, θ_c ≈ 2.13°) govern transitions between spin-independent and spin-polarized absorption regimes, driven by strain-induced Brillouin zone compression and twist-mediated moiré potential localization. Strain gradients further enhance nonlinear optical responses through symmetry-breaking effects while vertical electric fields enable the dynamic tuning of absorption coefficients over orders of magnitude by renormalizing bandgaps and delocalizing wavefunctions. These findings establish bilayer MoS₂ as a versatile platform for spin-resolved optoelectronics, offering tailored absorption profiles through parameter-specific strain–twist–electric field combinations. The theoretical framework presented here advances the design of tunable photonic devices such as polarization-sensitive detectors and wavelength-selective nonlinear optical modulators. Future efforts should prioritize the experimental validation of predicted thresholds and explore strain-gradient-engineered quantum interference in ultrafast spintronic applications, bridging theoretical insights with practical device engineering.