Next Article in Journal
Nanoporosity of Carbon–Sulfur Nanocomposites toward the Lithium–Sulfur Battery Electrochemistry
Next Article in Special Issue
Microwave-Assisted Rapid Synthesis of NH4V4O10 Layered Oxide: A High Energy Cathode for Aqueous Rechargeable Zinc Ion Batteries
Previous Article in Journal
Silver Nanoparticles Stable to Oxidation and Silver Ion Release Show Size-Dependent Toxicity In Vivo
Previous Article in Special Issue
Graphene Nanosheet-Wrapped Mesoporous La0.8Ce0.2Fe0.5Mn0.5O3 Perovskite Oxide Composite for Improved Oxygen Reaction Electro-Kinetics and Li-O2 Battery Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Cathode Materials for Aqueous Rechargeable Multivalent Metal-Ion Batteries

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Gyeonggi, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(6), 1517; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061517
Submission received: 20 May 2021 / Revised: 5 June 2021 / Accepted: 7 June 2021 / Published: 8 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials for Ion Battery Applications)

Abstract

:
The generation of renewable energy is a promising solution to counter the rapid increase in energy consumption. Nevertheless, the availability of renewable resources (e.g., wind, solar, and tidal) is non-continuous and temporary in nature, posing new demands for the production of next-generation large-scale energy storage devices. Because of their low cost, highly abundant raw materials, high safety, and environmental friendliness, aqueous rechargeable multivalent metal-ion batteries (AMMIBs) have recently garnered immense attention. However, several challenges hamper the development of AMMIBs, including their narrow electrochemical stability, poor ion diffusion kinetics, and electrode instability. Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have been extensively investigated for applications in energy storage devices because of their distinct chemical and physical properties. The wide interlayer distance of layered TMDs is an appealing property for ion diffusion and intercalation. This review focuses on the most recent advances in TMDs as cathode materials for aqueous rechargeable batteries based on multivalent charge carriers (Zn2+, Mg2+, and Al3+). Through this review, the key aspects of TMD materials for high-performance AMMIBs are highlighted. Furthermore, additional suggestions and strategies for the development of improved TMDs are discussed to inspire new research directions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nowadays, owing to their depleting sources and adverse effects on the environment, traditional fossil fuels have been replaced by various renewable sources, such as sunlight, tides, and wind. However, the non-continuous supply of these renewable resources has sparked the need to develop safe and low-cost energy storage devices, especially for large-scale grid applications [1,2,3]. Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been extensively investigated as an energy resource solution for grid applications and as the primary source of electrical machines owing to their high energy/power density and durability [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Nevertheless, the low availability of lithium, its growing cost, and safety issues hamper the application of these batteries in the production of commercial storage devices. Other monovalent metal-ion batteries, namely sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) and potassium-ion batteries (KIBs) have also been widely researched owing to their similar chemical properties to those of LIBs and the relatively higher abundance of Na and K [17,18,19,20,21]. Nevertheless, like LIBs, SIBs and KIBs use highly toxic electrolytes, which raise safety concerns and increase the fabrication costs.
Compared to batteries using organic electrolytes, aqueous rechargeable batteries (ARBs) possess tremendous competitive potential for energy storage devices because of their outstanding advantages such as: (i) high safety due to the absence of harmful solvents with high volatility; (ii) low cost and environmental friendliness; (iii) high ionic conductivity of aqueous electrolytes compared to that of organic electrolytes (1000 times higher); and (iv) the absence of a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer during the electrochemical reaction [22,23,24]. Therefore, ARBs can potentially meet the demands of high energy density, high elemental abundance, and better safety features [25,26]. In particular, the use of aqueous multivalent metal-ion batteries (AMMIBs) is an ingenious solution for meeting the rapidly increasing demand for high-performance and cost-effective energy storage devices. According to the data in Table 1, multivalent metal anode has high volumetric energy density and theoretical capacity due to the multi-electron transfer capability. Consequently, various efforts have been made to study the various types of AMMIBs, such as zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) [27,28,29,30], magnesium-ion batteries (MIBs) [31], aluminum-ion batteries (AIBs) [32], and calcium-ion batteries (CIBs) [33].
Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have attracted significant attention as potential materials in diverse applications pertaining to energy storage [34,35,36,37,38]. TMDs with the general formula MX2 (M: transition metal, X: chalcogen) are often considered as inorganic analogues of graphite. Every single TMD layer is formed by three atoms (X-M-X) with an M layer sandwiched by two X atomic layers. The weak interlayer van der Waals (vdW) force facilitates the insertion of ions [39,40,41,42]. This property is especially adequate for AMMIB electrodes that utilize large hydrated metal ions. For example, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) with an interlayer distance of 0.62 nm is considered as a representative member of the TMD family and can easily accommodate hydrated Zn2+ ions in its framework. Nevertheless, numerous studies have demonstrated the difficulty of Zn2+ storage in bulk MoS2 [24]. This indicates the incompatibility of MoS2 as a ZIB cathode despite its sufficient interlayer distance. Consequently, the simple adoption of TMDs as potential cathodes is not a great strategy for realizing high-performance ZIBs.
Table 1. Comparison of multivalent and monovalent metal-ions [23,30,33,43,44,45,46].
Table 1. Comparison of multivalent and monovalent metal-ions [23,30,33,43,44,45,46].
Charge Carrier IonsZn2+Mg2+Al3+Ca2+Li+Na+K+
Atomic mass (g mol−1)65.4124.3126.9840.086.9422.9939.1
Density (at 20 °C) (g cm−3)7.111.742.71.550.530.970.89
Crystal structureHexagonalHexagonalface-centered cubicface-centered cubicbody-centered cubicbody-centered cubicbody-centered cubic
Abundance a258353367
Metal cost (USD kg−1)2.22.21.92.2819.23.113.1
Ionic radius (Å)0.750.720.531.000.761.021.38
Hydrated ionic radius (Å)4.34.284.754.123.823.583.31
Redox potential vs. SHE−0.763−2.356−1.676−2.84−3.04−2.713−2.924
Gravimetric specific capacity of metal anode (mAh g−1)82022062980133738601166685
Volumetric specific capacity (mAh cm−1)585538348046207220611129610
a Ranking on the basis of the abundance of all the elements on earth.
Recently, there have been many reviews focusing on the TMD materials [47,48] and other cathode materials [49] for battery applications. While most previous reviews on TMD materials for battery applications covered various rechargeable batteries regardless of the electrolyte type [47,48], the reviews for the cathode materials dealt with a wide range of cathode candidate materials beyond TMDs [49]. The main viewpoint in this review is centered on the TMD materials as a cathode and multivalent metal ions dissolved in water as a electrolyte, respectively, which is distinctively different from most previous review articles. Figure 1a,b highlight some recent reviews and the numbers of publications on TMDs over the last 10 years [36,40,41,47,48,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59]. The number of publications on various TMD materials has been steadily increased from the year of 2010. In particular, the increase in publication number has been more radical since the year of 2015. In the perspectives of applications, TMDs have been widely used in energy, sensors, optoelectronic devices, piezoelectric devices, and biosensors (Figure 1c). Considering the high interest in energy storage using TMD materials, the reviews focusing on the AMMIB cathode materials have been rare. To stimulate new research strategies in this direction, this review provides an overview of TMDs as cathode materials in AMMIB. This review summarizes the current developments of TMD cathodes in various AMMIBs and discusses the main challenges as well as the advantages of employing TMDs in AMMIBs. Some modification strategies for TMDs have also been discussed to enhance multivalent-ion storage in aqueous batteries. Finally, the future perspective and outlook toward next-generation AMMIB cathode research will be discussed, which would be beneficial for the rational design of TMD-based materials for AMMIBs.

2. Brief Introduction of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides (TMDs)

2.1. Concept and Principle of TMDs

The chemical formula of TMDs is MX2, where M is the transition metal from groups 4–10 in the periodic table and X is the chalcogen, as illustrated in Figure 2a. In general, TMD materials with transition metals from groups 4–7 have a layered structure, whereas some transition metals from groups 8–10, such as pyrite, have a non-layered structure [39]. The atoms in layered MX2 are arranged as polytypes with a transition metal atom M surrounded by six chalcogen X atoms (Figure 2b). In a TMD monolayer (basal plane), strong covalent bonds between the transition metal and chalcogen result in the formation of stacking polytypes (stacking order) and polymorphs (metal coordination geometry). As shown in Figure 3a, the TMD structures have typical configurations such as 1T, 2H, and 3R, which indicate one (1), two (2), and three (3) layers per stacked cell unit in tetragonal (T), hexagonal (H), and rhombohedral (R) phases, respectively [53,57,60,61]. For example, MoS2 has all the three polytypes with a regular layered structure consisting of chalcogen atoms surrounding Mo transition metal atoms (as shown in Figure 3b) [62]. It is well-known that 1T-MoS2 is a metastable metal phase, whereas 2H-MoS2 and 3R-MoS2 are semiconductor phases with thermodynamic stability. In particular, 1T- and 2H-MoS2 are different in terms of the horizontal movement of one of the two sulfur planes. The intercalation of lithium ions (Li+ ions) can induce the 2H-to-1T phase transition [63].
While the electronic structure of graphene is based on the hybridization of s and p orbitals, the electronic properties of TMDs are determined by the electrons filled in the d orbitals of the transition metal. Although graphene and TMDs exhibit structural similarities, the electrical properties of TMDs are determined by the number of electrons in their non-bonding d orbitals, as well as the geometrical coordination of the transition metal atoms [64]. The degree of electron filling in the d orbital significantly affects the electrical properties of TMDs, where a partially filled d orbital imparts metallic properties, whereas a completely filled d orbital leads to a semiconducting behavior [39]. As a result, transition metal atoms have a greater influence on the electronic structure of TMDs than chalcogen atoms.

2.2. Advantages and Challenges of TMDs

Inspired by the great success of graphene, many two-dimensional (2D) materials with unique physical and chemical properties have recently gained significant attention [65,66,67,68]. In particular, layered TMDs have shown immense prospects for implementation in energy storage, catalysis, photonics, etc. [42,69,70]. Because of their large surface-to-volume ratio, which allows significantly increased interaction between the active material and electrolyte, graphene-like 2D TMDs are highly advantageous for battery applications [71,72]. Owing to the weak van der Waals (vdW) force, the ions can diffuse rapidly through the interlayer gap of MX2 layer. The large interlayer distance between the MX2 layer, in particular, makes it possible to accommodate multivalent ions such as Zn2+, Mg2+, Al3+, and Ca2+ [51,72,73].The interlayer distance and bandgaps of various TMDs commonly used in AMMIBs are shown in Figure 4.
Despite these benefits, the poor rate performance and cyclic stability of TMDs due to their low ionic conductance and large volume expansion limit their application as cathode materials in AMMIBs. Furthermore, the irreversible side effects during the charging and discharging processes decrease the coulombic efficiency of TMDs [59]. These disadvantages severely limit the application of TMDs as cathode materials for AMMIBs. For example, MoS2 is considered as a suitable cathode for Zn2+ storage owing to its large interlayer distance (0.62 nm) compared to its much smaller size (0.15 nm). Nevertheless, as reported by Liu et al., bulk MoS2 delivers a specific capacity of only 40 mAh g−1 because of the lack of clear redox peaks during electrochemical reactions [24]. This clearly shows that the interlayer distance of MoS2 is not the only factor that guarantees the high performance of ZIBs. The more important issue is the efficient ion adsorption on the electrode, which influences the electromigration characteristics of multivalent ions (Mz+) in the aqueous state. Hence, the ionic radius in the hydrated state (i.e., Mz+(H2O)n) is more important than the general ionic radius (i.e., Mz+). In practice, the radius of hydrated Zn2+ ions (0.404–0.430 nm) can obstruct their absorption into the minimum interlayer distances that the host TMD material can accommodate [74]. Another important issue affecting the performance of TMD cathode materials is the variation in their structural features during the electrochemical reaction. Typically, the conductivity retained by the 1T MoS2 phase is 107 times higher than that retained by the 2H MoS2 phase. In addition, while the 1T MoS2 phase is hydrophilic, the 2H MoS2 phase is hydrophobic. These different features of 1T and 2H MoS2 affect the adsorption and diffusion of multivalent ions in water, which eventually results in their distinct electrochemical performance in rechargeable aqueous ZIBs [75]. In addition to these fundamental aspects, the following section discusses the recent advancements of TMD cathode materials for AMMIBs.

3. TMD Cathode Materials for Multivalent Metal-Ion Batteries (MMIBs)

3.1. Zinc-Ion Batteries (ZIBs)

As can be observed from Table 1, among the different types of rechargeable metal-ion batteries, ZIBs possess the following appealing characteristics: (i) high abundance and low cost of zinc, facilitating their mass production, (ii) high redox potential (−0.763V vs. standard hydrogen electrode (SHE)), (iii) high theoretical volumetric energy density of zinc anodes (5855 mAh cm−1), and (iv) high safety. These features make zinc ions suitable for use in both aqueous and non-aqueous batteries [23,24,76]. Recently, aqueous ZIBs (AZIBs) have gained considerable attention because of their safety, low cost, and environmental friendliness. In particular, the ionic conductance of Zn2+ in water (1000 mS cm−1) is much higher than that in organic solvents (1–10 mS cm−1). Nevertheless, Zn2+ ions easily coordinate with six water molecules, making the diffusion of Zn2+ into the electrode more difficult. As a result, since Liu et al. [24] first reported the poor diffusion of Zn2+ ions into bulk MoS2, there have been a limited number of studies on this material with satisfactory results. For instance, Liang et al. proposed an increase in the interlayer distance and hydrophilicity of MoS2 via oxygen incorporation using a hydrothermal method to enhance the inherent diffusion of Zn2+ into the MoS2 layers [77]. The pristine MoS2 layers were activated by adding oxygen (replacing sulfur with oxygen) because of its smaller atomic radius (48 pm) than that of S (88 pm). The vdW interaction between the interlayers was reduced by the formation of the Mo–O bond; thus, the interlayer distance widened from 6.2 to 9.5 Å (Figure 5a). As a result, the presence of a small amount of oxygen (5%) in the layered MoS2 increased the Zn2+ diffusion coefficient by three orders of magnitude. Consequently, the activated MoS2 had a high Zn2+ storage capacity of 232 mAh g−1 (increased by approximately 10 times after the oxygen activation), and showed pronounced redox peaks as compared to the unmodified counterpart (Figure 5b,c). Li et al. also reported the expansion of the interlayer distance through its vertical alignment on a carbon fiber fabric by hydrothermal reaction (Figure 5d) [78]. This novel structure made the assembly suitable for Zn2+ diffusion because of the following reasons: (i) The interfacial contact between MoS2 and the electrolyte was improved through the 3D network of the carbon fibers, which facilitated the formation of Zn2+ diffusion pathways. (ii) The extended distance between the layers reduced the ionic diffusion resistance, thereby enhancing the reaction kinetics and reducing the energy barrier for Zn2+ diffusion. (iii) The carbon fibers derived from glucose facilitated the interaction between MoS2 and the carbon-based substrate through a good conducting network. As such, the expanded MoS2 delivered a discharge capacity of 202.6 mAh g−1 and excellent cycling performance (capacity retention of 98.6% after 600 cycles) along with a high rate capability (Figure 5e). They proposed the following Zn2+ storage mechanism: (1) at the cathode: xZn2+ + x2e +MoS2 ↔ ZnxMoS2; (2) at the anode: xZn + x2e ↔ xZn.
On a different note, Liu et al. reported that the proportion of the 1T MoS2 phase affects the performance of ZIBs [75]. The 1T MoS2 phase content was controlled via a hydrothermal reaction over the temperature range of 140−220 °C. At 160 °C, the percentage of 1T MoS2 was as high as 70%, which reduced significantly to 0.4% at 220 °C. The 1T MoS2 phase showed a significantly lower energy barrier for Zn2+ than the 2H MoS2 phase, further facilitating the diffusion of Zn2+. Consequently, the MoS2 with a high 1T phase content exhibited excellent electrochemical performance with a high capacity retention of 98.1% and a coulombic efficiency of ~100% after 400 cycles. These results suggest that the 1T MoS2 phase can effectively accelerate charge transfer because of its lower diffusion energy barrier for Zn2+ than that of the 2H MoS2 phase for the same interlayer distance. This study demonstrated the importance of phase control for MoS2 which can influence the electron density in TMDs, eventually affecting the battery performance. Understanding the exact mechanism and the conditions regarding how different phases can trigger the phase transition can provide new opportunities to realize high-performance TMD electrodes in the future.
Xu et al. applied defect engineering to prepare defect-rich MoS2 nanosheets via a facile hydrothermal process accompanied by heat treatment [79]. The introduction of defects into nanomaterials can be promising strategies because they can store more foreign ions and enhance the electrochemical performance of these batteries. From many theoretical predictions, researchers have found that defects can increase the active sites in the electrode. The presence of defects increases the surface energy of the electrode and provides new active sites, which promotes the ion adsorption and increase the capacity. Numerous edge sites and vacancies were created in these nanosheets in a controlled manner. Indeed, these defects facilitated the diffusion of Zn2+ and significantly improved the reversibility of the activated MoS2 as compared to its pristine counterpart. Additionally, the defects in MoS2 could increase its interaction with Zn2+, and at the same time, could extend its interlayer distance. Figure 6a shows the (100) plane stacking fault and disordered atomic disposition on the surface of the material. The inefficient plane stacking resulted in a significant increase in the edge spacing and a slightly increased interlayer distance (0.686 nm). In addition, a disturbance of the atoms caused cracking of the planes, leading to the formation of additional edges. The defect-rich MoS2 accelerated the diffusion of Zn2+ owing to the formation of new transport pathways at the numerous edges and defects. As a result, a satisfactory discharge capacity of 102.4 mAh g−1 was obtained after 600 cycles at 500 mA g−1, demonstrating the promising energy storage ability of MoS2 (Figure 6b). Yang et al. reported novel MoS2 nanosheets with a porous tubular structure prepared via template-assisted thermal decomposition [80]. As can be observed from the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image (Figure 6c), the MoS2 nanotube exhibited a layered structure with a interlayer distance of 0.65 nm. The tubular MoS2 showed the following merits for Zn2+ diffusion: (i) the formation of voids in the structure of the MoS2 nanosheets (the ratio of Mo and S atoms of 1:1.4) improved its ability to accommodate Zn2+; (ii) the tubular structure of the MoS2 nanosheets enhanced their electrolyte uptake and ion diffusion, which facilitated electron transport during the charge/discharge process. Thus, the novel MoS2 nanosheets exhibited a good discharge capacity of 146.2 mAh g−1 at 200 mA g−1 and excellent cycling performance with 74.0% capacity retention after 800 cycles.
In addition to MoS2, vanadium-based TMDs have also received considerable attention as promising materials for ZIB cathodes. For instance, He et al. prepared vanadium disulfide (VS2) nanosheets via a facile hydrothermal reaction for the first time [81]. The layered VS2 with high specific capacity and cyclic stability showed a huge potential for application in ZIBs. As shown in Figure 7a, the interlayer distance of the prepared VS2 was as high as 0.576 nm, which facilitated the diffusion of Zn2+. The as-prepared VS2 exhibited a high discharge capacity of 190.3 mAh g−1 at 50 mA g−1 and showed good cyclic stability (retained 98.0% of the initial capacity after 200 cycles) (Figure 7b). They proposed the occurrence of the following electrochemical reactions: (1) at the cathode, VS2+ 0.09Zn2++ 0.18e ↔ Zn0.09VS2, and Zn0.09VS2+ 0.14Zn2+ + 0.28e ↔ Zn0.23VS2; (2) at the anode: Zn2+ + 2e ↔ Zn.
Jiao et al. prepared a hierarchical 1T VS2 directly on a stainless steel mesh substrate (VS2@SS) without inactive materials such as binder and conductive additives to increase the active material content [82]. The open-flower structure of VS2 improved the interaction between the active material and electrolyte, which contributed to the favorable ion and electron transport. The free-standing VS2@SS electrodes showed several outstanding advantages: the VS2 flower structure was suitable for accommodating volume expansion, thereby reducing the chances of electrode degradation. In addition, the layered structure of the VS2 flower (interlayer spacing of 0.58 nm) was favorable for ion transport because it interacted well with the electrolyte and shortened the Zn2+ diffusion length. In general, the maximum electrochemical performance is achieved when the loading amount of the active material is small (below 3 mg cm−2). However, in this work, even when the active material loading was 4–5 mg cm−2, the VS2@SS electrode showed high discharge capacity (198 mAh g−1 at 50 mA g−1) and excellent cycling performance over 2000 cycles at 2000 mA g−1. With the increase in the mass loading, the thickness of electrode increases. An excessively high electrode thickness is likely to be fractured or even delaminated from the current collector during electrochemical reactions, resulting in the cycling instability. Moreover, the presence of binder and conductive additives in the conventional slurry-coated method reduces the gravimetric/volumetric energy density of the electrode. Therefore, the novel structure of VS2@SS without binder and conductive additives could resolve this issue. The good cyclic stability of VS2@SS was still achieved (90% retention for 600 cycles) even when the active material loading was increased to be 11 mg cm−2 in this study.
Wu et al. synthesized ultrathin vanadium diselenide (VSe2) nanosheets via a wet-chemical route [83]. The aqueous ZIB exhibited excellent rate capability with the discharge capacities of 131.8, 114.6, 105.2, 93.9, and 79.5 mAh g–1 at the current densities of 100, 200, 500, 1000, and 2000 mA g−1, respectively. When the current density returned to 100 mA g−1, the recovered capacity was 118.4 mAh g−1 (Figure 7c). In addition, the VSe2 nanosheets showed good specific capacity (131.8 mAh g−1 at 100 mA g−1) and cycling performance (retained capacity of 80.8% after 500 cycles) (Figure 7d). The excellent performance of the VSe2 nanosheet cathode could be attributed to the following reasons: (i) reversible intercalation/de-intercalation of Zn2+; (ii) rapid Zn2+ diffusion dynamics in the ultrathin 2D structures; (iii) metallic features of VSe2, which promoted its Zn2+ storage kinetics; and (iv) structural robustness during long-term cycling. The possible Zn2+ storage mechanism is as follows: (1) at the cathode: VSe2+ 0.23Zn2++ 0.46e ↔ Zn0.23VSe2, and Zn0.23VSe2+ 0.17Zn2++ 0.34e ↔ Zn0.4VSe2; (2) at the anode: 0.4 Zn ↔ 0.4Zn2+ + 0.8e.
Figure 7. (a) TEM image of VS2 nanosheets, (b) cyclic performance of VS2 nanosheets at 500 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from He et al. [81] Copyright 2017,WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (c) Rate capability of VS4, (d) cyclic performance of VSe2 nanosheets at 100 and 500 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Wu et al. [83] Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Figure 7. (a) TEM image of VS2 nanosheets, (b) cyclic performance of VS2 nanosheets at 500 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from He et al. [81] Copyright 2017,WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (c) Rate capability of VS4, (d) cyclic performance of VSe2 nanosheets at 100 and 500 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Wu et al. [83] Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Nanomaterials 11 01517 g007
Zhu et al. prepared a chain crystal framework of vanadium tetrasulfide (VS4) via a hydrothermal method as a cathode material for ZIBs [84]. With a loosely stacked structure formed by the atomic chains of VS4 bonded by a weak vdW force, VS4 was considered as a potential cathode for ZIBs. The Zn2+ reaction mechanism was explained as follows: (1) at the cathode, VS4+ 0.49Zn2++ 0.98e ↔ Zn0.49VS4, and Zn0.49VS4+ 0.54Zn2++ 1.08e ↔ Zn1.03VS4; (2) at the anode: Zn ↔ Zn2+ + 2e. As a result, the maximum capacity reached 110 mAh g−1, and high capacity was obtained even after 500 cycles, which is favorable for practical applications. The electrochemical performances of the recently reported TMD cathodes for ZIBs are summarized in Table 2.

3.2. Magnesium-Ion Batteries (MIBs)

Over the past few years, MIBs have been extensively studied owing to their environmentally friendliness, high abundance of Mg, high energy density, low reduction potential, and virtually non-dendrite formation [85]. The energy storage mechanism of MIBs is similar to that of ZIBs: intercalation and conversion processes. Although the ionic radius (0.72Å) and hydrated ionic radius of Mg2+(4.28 Å) are similar to those of Li+ (ionic radius of 0.76 Å and hydrated ionic radius of 4.3 Å of Li+), most cathode materials for LIBs are not favorable for MIBs owing to the high charge density of Mg2+ [86]. Cathode materials for MIBs should exhibit high reversible capacities under adequate operating voltages. The kinetics of Mg2+ diffusion through the cathode material is usually slow because of the high valence of Mg2+ ions, redistribution of divalent cations in the host material, and strong ionic interactions. Various strategies have been reported to overcome these limitations.
Yang et al. carried out first-principle studies and proposed MoS2 with a zigzag structure as a favorable cathode for rechargeable MIBs [87]. This study showed the detailed diffusion pathways for Mg2+ in the MoS2 nanoribbons. The specific diffusion path of Mg2+ was shown to be through a nearest-neighbor H site in a zigzag manner between two adjacent T sites in MoS2. This pathway in the MoS2 nanoribbons was different from the conventional pathways of graphene nanoribbons, where Mg2+ ions undergo hopping between the intralayer hollow sites across the C–C bridge. The maximum theoretical capacity of a MoS2 nanoribbon (width of 5 nm) that can accommodate six Mg atoms was predicted to be 232.2 mAh g−1. Liang et al. synthesized highly exfoliated, graphene-like MoS2 (G-MoS2) as a cathode material for MIBs through a solvothermal process [88]. The synthesis of G-MoS2 was from solvothermal reaction between MoO3 and thioacetamide with pyridine as a solvent. The nature of few layer MoS2 was confirmed by XRD which showed significantly reduced intensity of (002) peak for G-MoS2 compared with bulk-MoS2 (B-MoS2). In addition, the interlayer distance of the prepared G-MoS2 was 0.65–0.70 nm, which is larger than that of B-MoS2 (0.63 nm) (Figure 8a). Apart from cathode side, the anode part was also studied; the ultra-small Mg nanoparticles (N-Mg, diameter of ~2.5 nm) was prepared by ionic liquid-assisted chemical reduction and compared with bulk Mg (B-Mg). The full cell performance of four different cells (G-MoS2/N-Mg, G-MoS2/B-Mg, B-MoS2/N-Mg, and B-MoS2/B-Mg) was systematically compared (Figure 8b). The results showed significantly improved cyclic performance for G-MoS2/N-Mg cell in terms of specific capacity and cyclic stability. The measured Mg storage capacity of MoS2 was estimated to be 170 mAh g−1 after 50 cycles. It was noted that this capacity was 24% lower than its theoretical capacity (232.2 mAh g−1), which probably originated in the partial restacking of the MoS2 layers and the intercalation of Mg only on one side of the MoS2 layer. The high performance of G-MoS2/N-Mg cell was attributed to the reduction in the passive film on the surface of N-Mg that increases the diffusion coefficient and increased available intercalation sites in g-MoS2. Liu et al. fabricated MoS2/C microspheres with a sandwich structure via a hydrothermal process and heat treatment [89]. The carbon formed by the hydrothermal glucose carbonization improved the ionic conductance and extended the interlayer spacing, facilitating the diffusion of Mg2+ and making the process reversible. In addition, the graphene-like MoS2/C structure promoted the access of Mg2+ ions to the electrolyte, facilitating Mg2+ transport. As a result, the sandwiched MoS2/C delivered a discharge capacity of 118.8 mAh g−1 after 20 cycles at 50 mA g−1 and exhibited excellent cycling stability as compared to bulk MoS2. Truong et al. reported the rapid exfoliation of MoS2 and molybdenum diselenide (MoSe2) nanosheets using the supercritical fluid (SCF) method [90]. SCF exfoliation is a facile and fast process used to produce high-quality TMD nanosheets (few-layer). They applied this process to MoS2 and MoSe2 and obtained few-layer (1–10 layers) nanosheets with hexagonal structures (2H stacking sequence). The structure was precisely observed using atomic-resolution high-angle annular dark-field imaging. When used as MIB electrodes, the MoS2 and MoSe2 nanosheets delivered the specific capacities of 81 mAh g−1 after 10 cycles and 55 mAh g−1 after five cycles at 0.02 A g−1, respectively, which are superior to those of pristine MoS2 and MoSe2.
Mao et al. studied layered MX2 (M = Ti, V; X = O, S, Se) as a model to examine how different chalcogen species affect the Mg intercalation dynamics of MIBs [91]. TiSe2 showed the best electrochemical performance among all the samples investigated owing to the following factors: (i) the interlayer spacing of TiSe2 was greater than the size of Mg2+; (ii) the vdW interaction between the basal planes of TiSe2 was very weak, which facilitated the diffusion of Mg2+ into the layers; (iii) the electronic conductivity of TiSe2 was higher than those of its counterparts. In addition, the authors proposed further modification methods to improve the intercalation kinetics of the compound, including: (i) using anions with less electronegativity, (ii) diminishing the electrostatic interaction between Mg2+ and the host (e.g., incorporation of monovalent anions on the host materials); (iii) developing an open-tunnel structure for the MX2 to redistribute the charge and electric conductivity. This report provides guidelines for choosing and designing high-performance cathodes with rapid dynamics for MIBs. Gu et al. developed a MIB with a micrometer-sized TiSe2 cathode operated at room temperature [92]. They found that the crucial factor that improves the reversible Mg2+-intercalation/deintercalation is charge displacement in the metal-binding units, which is induced by the strong d-p orbital hybridization in TiSe2. In the case of selenides, the highly overlapped d and p orbitals promote d-p orbital hybridization because of the larger 4p-orbital dimensions of selenides than those of oxides or sulfides. Furthermore, 2D ion-conducting channels in the gap between the basal planes of TiSe2 reduce the coulombic repulsion among the Mg ions. This study has demonstrated the importance of d-p orbital hybridization between transition metal atom and the chalcogen atom in TMDs. The strong d-p orbital hybridization induced by their close energy levels might be one of the key factors, which improves the reversible intercalation/deintercalation of Mg2+. It will be interesting whether such concept can be applicable to other types of multivalent ions (Zn2+ and Al3+) for the TMD electrodes. Xu et al. employed a simple one-step hydrothermal method to synthesize a flower-like tungsten diselenide (WSe2) nanosheet [93]. Figure 8c shows the lattice spacings of 0.68 and 0.28 nm, which correspond to the d-spacing of the (002) and (100) crystal plane of WSe2, respectively. There have been only a limited number of studies utilizing WSe2 for MIBs due to its low conductivity and structural instability that leads to the rapid degradation during electrochemical reactions. However, in this work, they overcame these by developing a novel structure (i.e., orderly flower structure) that effectively increased the contact area between electrode and electrolyte and allowed abundant ion channels through highly connected three-dimensional nanostructure. The WSe2 cathode showed a high reversible capacity of 265 mAh g−1, excellent cycling performance with a capacity retention of 90% after 100 cycles at 50 mA g−1, and excellent rate capability with 70% capacity retention even at 500 mA g−1 (Figure 8d). The following Mg2+ storage mechanism was proposed: (1) at the cathode: 6WSe2+ 4Mg2++ 8e ↔ Mg4W6Se12; (2) at the anode: 4Mg ↔ 4Mg2++ 8e. The hydrothermal method is one of the common processes for the synthesis of novel TMD structures. The property of TMD is strongly related to its phase, size, morphology, and crystallinity. These features can be controlled by rational design and careful tuning of the hydrothermal process conditions. Therefore, it is important to understand the general mechanism of the hydrothermal growth of TMD (e.g., how parameters such as the precursor, substrate, additive, temperature, reaction time, and solvent affect the growth of TMD materials). The electrochemical performances of the recently reported MD-based MIB cathodes are summarized in Table 3. Based on Table 3, it can be clearly seen that the new structure design of TMD is one of the important strategies to create high-performance cathodes in MIBs. To prevent the restacking of TMD nanosheets, one of the most effective approaches is to prepare layered TMD nanomaterials with a hierarchical structure. In this hierarchical structure, the high surface-to-volume ratio offers abundant electrochemical active sites for ion storage, shortens the diffusion distance of Mg2+ ions, and alleviates the volume change of layered TMD nanomaterials by the presence of large voids during the repetitive charge/discharge processes. In this context, the hierarchical WSe2 nanoflower has been demonstrated as a promising material in terms of the specific capacity and capacity retention (Table 3) [93]. Moreover, the carbon coating of layered TMD nanomaterials is another effective strategy because it can give high electrical conductivity and good elasticity for TMD materials.
Figure 8. (a) TEM image of G-MoS2 nanosheet, (b) cyclic performance of G-MoS2 and B-MoS2 with Mg nanoparticle (N-Mg) and bulk Mg (B-Mg) anodes at 20 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Liang et al. [88] Copyright 2011, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim.(c) TEM image of WSe2 nanosheets, (d) cyclic performance of WSe2 nanosheets at 50 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Xu et al. [93] Copyright 2020, Elsevier Inc.
Figure 8. (a) TEM image of G-MoS2 nanosheet, (b) cyclic performance of G-MoS2 and B-MoS2 with Mg nanoparticle (N-Mg) and bulk Mg (B-Mg) anodes at 20 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Liang et al. [88] Copyright 2011, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim.(c) TEM image of WSe2 nanosheets, (d) cyclic performance of WSe2 nanosheets at 50 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Xu et al. [93] Copyright 2020, Elsevier Inc.
Nanomaterials 11 01517 g008

3.3. Aluminum-Ion Batteries (AIBs)

The concept of rechargeable AIBs was first discovered in 1970 [94]. AIBs offer many advantages such as low cost, high safety, and high electrochemical energy storage. Nevertheless, AIBs suffer from many challenges, including low ionic diffusion [95], material disintegration [96], poor durability [97,98,99,100,101,102,103], and the formation of passive oxide layers [46]. The energy storage mechanism of AIBs is similar to that of the other AMMIBs (the conversion and intercalation reactions); however, the hydrated ionic radius of Al3+ (4.75 Å) is larger than those of other multivalent charge carriers (Zn2+, Mg2+, and Ca2+). Thus, it is difficult to select a suitable cathode material for AIBs.
Fan et al. prepared interlayer-expanded MoS2 nanosheets on graphene foam via a hydrothermal process as a cathode material for AIBs [104]. They expanded the interlayer distance of the MoS2 nanosheets to 1.0 nm (Figure 9a), which improved the structural stability of the nanosheets and prevented large volume changes due to the facile intercalation of Al3+. Therefore, the diffusion barrier of Al3+ and ion trapping were greatly reduced, thus increasing the number of ion storage locations. The amorphous carbon used in this study was formed by heat treatment at 450 °C, which enhanced the interaction between the MoS2 sheets and graphene foam, resulting in the formation of a highly conductive three-dimensional (3D) structure. As a result, the MoS2 nanosheets exhibited a specific capacity of 105 mAh g−1 after 20 cycles, and the capacity decreased gradually to 87.6 mAh g−1 after 120 cycles at 200 mA g−1 (Figure 9b). Li et al. prepared MoS2 microspheres as a cathode material for AIBs via a simple hydrothermal process [105]. They analyzed the Al3+ intercalation and deintercalation sites in the MoS2 microspheres as the S–Mo–S bonding (A1) and vdW gap (A2) sites. During the charge insertion/deinsertion process, the A1 sites tended to lose their capacity and underwent a phase transition, whereas the A2 sites were more stable for the (de)intercalation of the Al3+ ions. They described the process of (de) intercalation of Al3+ as follows: (i) the discharge process: Al3+ initially intercalated at the A1 sites, then continued to intercalate at the A2 sites; (ii) charge process: Al3+ first deintercalated from the A2 sites and finally from the A1 sites of the cathode. The high electrostatic interaction between Al3+ and S2- anionic network in S-Mo-S (A1 site) led to the electrochemical polarization of MoS2, which was not favorable for the reversible intercalation/deintercalation of Al3+. This electrostatic interaction causes loss in capacity and phase transition due to high electrochemical polarization of MoS2. On the other hand, Al3+ ions adsorbed at A2 site (constructed by the van der Walls force with a small electrostatic effect) tend to undergo more reversible intercalation/deintercalation. As a result, the AIB exhibited the excellent discharge capacities of 253.6 and 66.7 mA h g−1 at 20 and 40 mA g−1, respectively, after 100 cycles. Similar results were reported by Divya et al. [106] Al3+ intercalated into two vacant sites, M1 and M2, where M1 is the X site in X-Mo-X atoms (X: S, Se, and SSe) and M2 represents the interlayer distance of MoX2 (Figure 9c). The phase transformation after the first few intercalations/deintercalations led to the accommodation of more Al3+ ions, resulting in a higher capacity than that of the original MoS2. On the other hand, this 2H-to-1T structural change led to potential deformation and disorder, resulting in an unstable capacity depending on the X atoms in MoX2. As a result, while MoSe2 showed a high coulombic efficiency of 95% at the current density of 100 mA g−1, the coulombic efficiencies of MoS2 and MoSSe were much lower (Figure 9d).
Wu et al. prepared VS2 nanosheets as a highly-efficient cathode material for AIBs by physically depositing a coating on graphene (G-VS2) [107]. Owing to the synergistic effect of the modified layered VS2 and graphene (layered spacing of 5.75 Å), the AIB with G-VS2 showed significantly improved electrochemical performance as compared to that with pristine VS2. Owing to its highly stable framework, G-VS2 provided a good support for ion diffusion and improved electron transport properties. As a result, G-VS2 delivered a discharge capacity of 50 mAh g−1 at 100 mA g−1 with a coulombic efficiency of ~100% after 50 cycles (vs. 22 mAh g−1 of pristine VS2 under the same conditions). The Al3+ storage mechanism of G-VS2 is as follows: (1) at the cathode: VS2 + xAl3+ + 3xe ↔ AlxVS2; (2) at the anode: Al + AlCl4 ↔ Al2Cl7.
Geng et al. investigated the insertion/extraction behavior of Al3+ in layered titanium disulfide (TiS2) and spinel-based cubic Cu0.31Ti2S4 in AIBs [108]. In their work, the Al3+ ions occupied mainly the octahedral sites in the layered TiS2 owing to the less adaptive nature of Al3+ ions in the layered TiS2. The major obstacle for the facile intercalation/deintercalation of Al3+ ions was associated with the Al3+ diffusion coefficient, as revealed by galvanostatic intermittent titration analysis results. The strong coulombic interaction between the Al3+ ions and anionic sulfide sites increased the energy barrier for Al3+ diffusion. This effect was more pronounced in the spinel-based cubic Cu0.31Ti2S4 than in the layered TiS2. As a result, the discharge capacity of the layered TiS2 at 50 °C was considerably higher than that at room temperature. The capacity of the layered TiS2 increased gradually after the first few cycles and stabilized at approximately 70 mAh g−1, whereas the discharge capacity of the cubic Cu0.31Ti2S4 at 50 °C was only approximately 25 mAh g−1 (Figure 10a,b). Geng et al. also prepared Mo6S8 particles using a precipitation procedure [109]. In this study, they not only demonstrated the good performance of Mo6S8, but elucidated the two distinct Al adsorption sites in chevrel phase Mo6S8. From Figure 10c, the larger site (Al1) can be visualized as a cubic center of a hexahedron with eight Mo6S8 units as the vertices, whereas the smaller site (Al2) can be visualized as a face centered hexahedron. Al3+ ions could occupy the Al1 position more easily than the Al2 position because of the strong electrostatic interaction between the Al3+ ions at the Al1 position. Al3+ ions could occupy the Al1 position more easily than the Al2 position because of the strong electrostatic interaction between the Al3+ ions at the Al1 position. Although the number of available sites for the Al intercalation was six on the hexahedron, the actual number of Al filled in the sites was only two (Al2Mo6S8) due to the strong electrostatic force from Al cation with three positive charges. The Al3+ storage mechanism of the Mo6S8 particles was described as follows: (1) at the cathode: 8[Al2Cl7] + 6e + Mo6S8 ↔ Al2Mo6S8 + 14[AlCl4]; (2) at the anode: Al + 7[AlCl4] ↔ 4[Al2Cl7] +3e. The capacity of Mo6S8 was rapidly stabilized after the first cycle and maintained at 70 mAh g−1 after 50 cycles (Figure 10d). The electrochemical performances of the recently reported MD-based AIBs cathodes are summarized in Table 4. At present, it is still challenging to select suitable cathode materials for AIBs because the hydrated ionic radius of Al3+ (4.75 Å) is larger than those of other multivalent charge carriers. Therefore, most researches regarding AIBs with TMDs are only in the immature stage of understanding the reversible intercalation and extraction of Al in various TMDs materials. Based on Table 4, MoS2 and G-VS2 have been demonstrated as impressive candidates for AIB cathodes in terms of specific capacity and capacity retention. Similar to other types of AMMIBs (ZIBs and MIBs), the control of MoS2 nanostructure (MoS2 on graphene foam [104] or MoS2 microsphere [105]) is efficient strategy in realizing good performance in AIBs. As for VS2, it possesses the potential due to its high theoretical capacity based on the multiple chemical oxidation states in vanadium and sulfide atom. Besides, the interlayer space of VS2 is 5.76 Å, which is large enough to enable the facile intercalation/de-intercalation of Al3+ ions. Furthermore, the strategy of VS2 hybridization with graphene (G-VS2) is one of the promising approaches to improve the performance because it can facilitate the Al3+ ion transport and reduce the restacking in VS2 cathode materials [107].

4. Modification Strategies for TMDs toward High-Performance Aqueous Multivalent Metal-Ion Batteries (AMMIBs)

The results discussed thus far emphasize the need to activate TMD cathodes to achieve good electrochemical performance for AMMIB applications. Although TMD materials have large interlayer spacing, their high energy barrier of multivalent ions limits their application as high-performance cathodes. Many modification strategies have been proposed to create structures that can realize the high electrochemical performance of TMD materials. In this section, we have summarized the modification strategies used to improve the structural stability of TMD materials in order to realize their AMMIB applications. The main modification strategies for TMDs include: (1) interlayer modification, (2) defect modification, (3) hybridization, and (4) phase modification.

4.1. Interlayer Modification

The metal ion (Mn+) intercalation channel in a cathode crystal significantly affects its electrochemical behavior. Therefore, the adjustment of cation channels and coordination in the interlayer not only encourages the intercalation/deintercalation of Mn+, but also enhances the electrochemical performance of the TMD cathode. The introduction of intercalants into 2D layered TMD materials is a viable strategy for enhancing their electrochemical performance [110].
Small guest intercalants (SGIs) such as ions, small molecules, and polymers can alter the interlayer spacing of TMDs [58,111,112,113,114]. Nevertheless, the following factors need to be considered for the incorporation of these small intercalants into the interlayer spacing of TMDs: (i) SGIs can occupy the active site and block the cationic pathway. This interaction may deteriorate the diffusion kinetics of the cations. Thus, a rigorous management of the quantity, geometry, functional structure, and interaction sites in the interlayer spacing should be taken into account to ensure effective cation diffusion; (ii) the integrity of SGIs in the TMD framework is crucial for the long lifespan of the electrode. Small molecules and low-valence ions are more susceptible to deintercalation from the lattices than high-molecular-weight polymers or high-valence ions; (iii) the introduction of SGIs with unnecessary mass and volume leads to a decrease in the theoretical power and energy densities of the electrode. In general, the interlayer modification of cathodic materials should be carried out carefully to ensure cationic intercalation and deintercalation without negatively affecting the electrochemical properties of the electrode [115].
Chemical vapor transport, electrochemical treatment, ion exchange, and oxide-reduction methods have been used to intercalate SGIs into TMDs [77,112]. The insertion of SGIs can modify the electron filling state in the orbital and Fermi stages of TMDs, often resulting in unusual properties such as superconductivity, charge density waves, and Peierls instability (characteristic phenomenon of one-dimensional electron-lattice systems). The increased interlayer distance is extremely effective in lowering the Mn+ intercalation energy barrier. In view of these benefits, there have been several reports on using various SGIs to modify the interlayer spacing of TMDs. The benefits and drawbacks of intercalation strategies (intercalation of hydrophilic and carbon species and exfoliation technique) are discussed in the following sections.

4.1.1. Intercalation of Hydrophilic Species into TMDs

The introduction of an oxygen atom into MoS2 has been suggested as an effective strategy for lowering the energy barrier of Zn2+, enhancing the intrinsic diffusion and facilitating structural changes in layered MoS2 (Figure 11). Because the interlayer distance of pristine MoS2 (3.1 Å) is too small, the insertion of large Zn2+ hydrate molecules (5.5 Å) is difficult. According to density functional theory (DFT) calculations, a 66 kcal mol−1 energy per coordination (Zn–O) bond is required to break a hydrated ZnII–OH2 bonds to form ZnII–S bonds, which is a large energetic penalty (Figure 11a). However, the energetic requirement can be significantly reduced when the interlayer distance is increased by introducing OH functional groups to form Zn–OH bonds without breaking the water molecules complexed with Zn2+ ion. The interlayer distance of MoS2-O can be increased to accommodate hydrated Zn2+ molecules (five water molecules complexed with Zn2+ to form a solvated shell, as shown in Figure 11b). In addition, MoS2 possesses hydrophobic properties, which make the intercalation process challenging owing to the weak interaction between Zn-H2O and S. To resolve this, Liang et al. used oxygen atoms to replace the sulfur atom in MoS2, which improved the hydrophilic properties of MoS2 and enhanced the interaction of Zn-H2O-O in it (Figure 11c). Figure 11d shows the effective energy required depending on the hydration level of Zn2+ cations for intercalation into MoS2 and MoS2-O. An increase in the interlayer distance of MoS2 favors a reduction in the number of Zn–H2O bonds, resulting in a reduced energy barrier. The interlayer modification method used by Liang et al. can be utilized to improve the ion storage efficiency of TMDs, creating new trends for the development of advanced materials for energy storage devices.

4.1.2. Exfoliation

Liquid-phase exfoliation is a direct chemical method, which has been demonstrated to be an appropriate method for the production of industrial-scale nanosheets [116,117,118,119,120,121]. Exfoliation under slight sonification [118] or high-shear mixing [121] in stable organic solvents or water-based surfactants can be utilized to prepare TMD nanosheets. Sonification-assisted liquid-phase exfoliation in organic solvents is a facile procedure for the synthesis of TMDs with few layers. The energy required for the exfoliation process is reduced owing to the strong interaction of the solvent with the bulk materials and the solvation process. The solvents used in the exfoliation method should have high solvation power. However, the limitations of this method include sensitivity to the ambient environment, structural deformation, and changes in the electronic properties.
Recently, the SCF method has been widely used to prepare high-quality graphene and inorganic nanosheets for industrial applications [122,123,124]. The main advantage of this method is that it can disperse the products without changing their original nature [122]. The SCF method was recently utilized to exfoliate MoS2 into few-layer nanosheets. Solvents used in the SCF method should have low surface tension and high diffusion coefficient, serving as a good medium to exfoliate TMDs. Truong et al. used a SCF to create few-layer (1–10) MoS2 and MoSe2 nanosheets. They demonstrated that the exfoliated nanosheets of both MoS2 and MoSe2 could retain their 2H stacking sequence during the exfoliation process (Figure 12a), [90]. Yang et al. systematically investigated the absorption of Mg on zigzag MoS2 nanoribbons. The results indicated that ionic bonds were formed predominantly through interactions between the guest Mg atoms and MoS2 nanoribbon substrate, while some covalent hybridizations still existed simultaneously to some extent. The T position at the edge of the nanoribbon was the most stable for the absorption of the guest Mg atoms. The Mg diffusion pathway was identified as two adjacent T and H positions on the zigzag MoS2 nanoribbons (Figure 12b). As a result, the MoS2 nanoribbons exhibited a maximum theoretical capacity of 223.2 mAh g−1 [87].

4.2. Defect Modification

In recent years, the defect technique has been widely used as an effective method to modify the surface properties and electronic structure of electrodes. Defect modification of the crystal structure proceeds according to the second law of thermodynamics [125,126,127]. Point defects, which play an important role in defect modification, can be divided into two categories: intrinsic and non-intrinsic defects [128,129,130]. The thermal vibration of the atomic lattice is responsible for the generation of internal defects, which do not affect the overall composition of the crystal. Schottky and Frenkel defects are examples of intrinsic defects [131,132]. Schottky defects are formed from lattice vacancies generated by the thermal vibration of atoms or ions in the crystal structure at the initial lattice position, whereas Frenkel defects are formed by the intercalation of atoms or ions into the lattice sites. Non-intrinsic defects are due to impurity atoms or ions being embedded into the lattice, and hence are also known as heteroatomic defects [133]. Point defects cause lattice distortion by disturbing the surrounding atoms, which can affect the electronic structure, chemical properties, or ionic conductance of the material, thereby regulating its electrochemical properties. The defects can be formed ranging from faults on an atomic scale that are inherent to crystallographic structures to larger defects that are introduced during fabrication process. Generally, it is difficult to control the defects caused by the fabrication process because they are non-uniform and unpredictable, leading to a serious failure during fabrication. The misapplication of the manufacturing process or lack of control at any stage may introduce defects and residual stresses that can affect the performance of the materials, making it susceptible to failure. These types of defects can include holes, cracks, segregation, inclusions, surface marks, notches and other undesirable or unintentional property changes within the material [134].
Defect sites can be the active, storage, and absorption sites that can immobilize the foreign ions during the reaction process. Defect modification affects the (de)intercalation of metal ions in layered materials, causing a decrease in the stress and electrostatic force between the adjacent layers, which reduces the diffusion energy barrier and promotes ion dissolution as well as charge transfer during metal ion intercalation. The main effects of defect modification in a material are as follows: (i) the ionic charge can be redistributed through defect engineering, thereby promoting the process of ion diffusion and electron transfer; (ii) the ion storage can be increased through the defect sites, leading to an increase in the capacity of the material; (iii) defect engineering also contributes to the enhanced dynamics in electrochemical reactions and phase transitions owing to the formation of multiple active sites in TMDs; (iv) defect engineering enhances the structural stability of TMD materials, making them resistant to structural damage caused by the insertion/extraction of foreign ions. As a result, the defect modification of TMDs may be a feasible approach to improve their electrochemical performance for application as ZIB cathodes. For instance, to facilitate Zn2+ intercalation in MoS2, Xu et al. used defect engineering by controlling its multiple edge and void sites [79]. The defects so formed included exposed edge sites and defects within the basal planes of MoS2. The defects formed were S vacancies combined with a disturbed atomic arrangement, resulting in the cracking of the basal plane and the formation of complementary edges or boundaries. These defects generated a large number of active sites in the electrode, which improved its electrochemical performance in the ZIB. Similar defect strategies have been applied in manganese oxide cathode materials (MnO2). Xiong et al. [135] studied the use of oxygen deficient σ-MnO2 as a cathode material for ZIB. Gibbs free energy of Zn2+ adsorption in the vicinity of oxygen deficient region can be reduced to a thermoneutral value (≈0.05 eV) by generating oxygen vacancies (OV) in the MnO2 lattice. This suggests that Zn2+ adsorption/desorption process on oxygen-deficient MnO2 is more reversible as compared to pristine MnO2. In addition, because fewer electrons are needed for Zn–O bonding in oxygen-deficient MnO2, more valence electrons can be contributed to the delocalized electron cloud of the material, which promotes the attainable capacity. As a result, the stable Zn/oxygen-deficient MnO2 battery was able to deliver one of the highest capacities of 345 mAh g−1 reported for a birnessite MnO2 system.

4.3. Hybridization with Carbon

Hybridization of two or more materials is a technique that combines the advantages of all the components to create novel materials with improved functionalities and electrochemical performance [136,137]. Layered TMD nanomaterials are often hybridized with other materials such as carbon, metal sulfides, metal oxides, and conductive polymers. Among these, carbon-based materials are the most commonly used materials to form hybrids with TMDs [138]. The high electrical conductivity of carbon materials accelerates the electron transport in TMDs and reduces the diffusion energy barrier, thereby improving their electrochemical performance.
In the TMDs hybridized with carbon, the carbon can be a supporting material, coated material, and intercalated material depending on the role and its length scale. Supporting carbon means the carbon that acts as a matrix for TMD materials. It is generally used for a carbon in a more or less macroscopic scale. Carbon coating generally means the carbon coated on the TMD surface. Intercalated carbon means the carbon that has been intercalated into layered TMDs in much smaller length scale (less than 1 nm). For example, glucose was converted to a polysaccharide through hydrothermal synthesis with abundant hydroxyl functional groups (Figure 13a) [139,140]. After converting it to the graphene foam as a carbon support, MoS2 was synthesized on this substrate to form a freestanding MoS2/graphene foam. The carbon coating of TMD nanoplatelets with other hybrid materials provides a large surface area and effectively inhibits of the restacking of the nanoplatelets [141,142,143]. Carbon coatings often form a graphene-like framework that improves the electrochemical performance of the cathode in ZIBs [78], MIBs [89,104], and AIBs [107]. Besides, the coated carbon enhances the ionic conductance of the TMD, which facilitates the diffusion of Mn+ through the 3D foam structure (Figure 13b). Intercalated carbon has also been explored as an effective material for the interlayer expansion of TMDs (Figure 13c). Li et al. demonstrated the increase in MoS2 interlayer distance from 0.62 to 0.70 nm after carbon intercalation.
Over the past few decades, various methods have been proposed to control the morphology and structure of layered TMD hybrid materials. Hydrothermal/solvothermal synthesis methods are cost-effective and offer large product yields. The chemical vapor deposition method is a popular bottom-up method for developing high-quality layered TMD nanomaterials on many substrates. Exfoliation is a top-down method for preparing TMD nanosheets from bulk TMDs. As hybrids of layered TMDs with other materials show the merits of all the constituents, they are considered as potential candidates for application in energy storage devices [68,69,144]. Thus, the use of hybrid TMDs is an efficient approach for designing high-performance AMMIBs.

4.4. Phase Modification

The electronic structures of graphene and silicon are determined by the hybridization of their s and p orbitals, whereas the electronic structure of TMD layers is mainly affected by the d-orbital filling of the transition metal. The electron density of the d-orbitals in the transition metal affects the phase state of TMDs, and the electron filling of the d-orbitals causes phase modification in TMDs. Phase modification is often used to alter the electronic properties of a material. In general, phase modification in TMDs occurs incompletely, thereby resulting in the formation of mixed 1T and 2H phases.
As a representative TMD, MoS2 possesses different structural stages depending on the metal coordination geometry, properties, and stacking order. For instance, bulk MoS2 has two different phases: the 2H phase with a triangular prismatic coordinated geometry (bandgap of 1.3 eV) and the 1T phase with an octahedral coordination between Mo and S atoms (metallic properties), as shown in Figure 14a [63,145,146]. The ionic conductivity of the 1T MoS2 phase is much larger than that of the 2H MoS2 phase [147,148,149]. The different phases of MoS2 affect its electrochemical performance. For example, the phase engineering of MoS2 has been demonstrated to be an effective strategy for modifying its catalytic capacity [150,151,152,153]. Because of the different atomic and electronic structures of the hydrophobic 2H and hydrophilic 1T phases, the different concentrations of the two phases in MoS2 can significantly affect the adsorption sites and diffusion pathways for Zn2+ ions in rechargeable aqueous ZIBs (Figure 14b). Liu et al. proposed an effective method to produce MoS2 nanosheets with different phase contents through phase modification [75]. The MoS2 nanosheets with a high 1T phase content (~70%) showed better specific capacity and cycling performance in ZIBs than those with the 2H phase. In addition, as the distance between the interlayers increased, the diffusion energy barrier of Zn also decreased (Figure 14c).

5. Conclusion and Outlook

In this review, the potential of layered TMDs for application as AMMIB cathodes is discussed. TMDs have many advantages over other cathode materials: (i) it is facile to control the interlayer spacing; (ii) ion transport is fast benefited from layer structure; (iii) they are abundant in nature and environmentally friendly; (iv) they can be utilized easily for flexible battery applications owing to its mechanical flexibility; (v) they can be produced on a large-scale using exfoliation of bulk TMDs (top-down approach) and sol-gel synthesis (bottom-up approach). However, there are still challenges that should be overcome when using TMD as a cathode material in AMMIBs: (i) the electronic conductivities of most TMDs are not sufficiently high due to the nature of the semiconductor with a certain bandgap; (ii) a highly dispersed TMDs can be restacked during repeated charge/discharge processes due to interfacial instability among TMDs with few layers; (iii) the increase in surface area of TMDs tends to produce various byproducts (e.g., gel-like polymer) from electrolyte decomposition, leading to the irreversibility of the electrochemical reaction. Despite their sufficient interlayer spacing as compared to the size of Mn+, TMDs suffer from ionic diffusion in aqueous environments because of the hydration effect, which increases the hydrodynamic size of Mn+.
Therefore, special efforts should be made to overcome these obstacles. Various strategies such as (1) intercalation modification, (2) defect modification, (3) hybridization, and (4) phase modification have been proposed to reduce the ion diffusion energy barrier, increase the interlayer spacing, improve the ion absorption, increase the electronic conductivity, and increase the hydrophilicity of TMD electrodes as discussed earlier. In addition, doping of appropriate materials in TMDs can increase the electronic conductivity especially for the wide bandgap TMDs. Moreover, as predicted from many recent theoretical studies using DFT calculations, the TMD heterostructure (e.g., MoS2/MoSe2, MoS2/WS2, etc.) can retain much higher theoretical capacity than single component TMDs. Toward this direction, a facile and reliable synthesis of TMD heterostructure is proposed as a promising opportunity.
Although great progress has been achieved in the development of TMD-based cathode materials for AMMIBs, extensive efforts are still required to design novel TMD cathode materials for future energy storage devices. It is still challenging to synthesize MX2 nanostructures with controllable size, interlayer distance, number of layers, phases, composition, and amounts of intercalated foreign species through facile, large-scale, and green synthesis methods. The correlation between the interlayer spacing of TMDs and the hydrodynamic size of ionic species is one of the basic factors to be considered for realizing high-performance AMMIBs. In addition, understanding the adsorption and diffusion mechanisms, origin of possible instability during intercalation/deintercalation, and the role of structural features in TMDs are all important aspects for designing novel TMD materials that can create new opportunities in AMMIBs.
To meet these expectations, a systematic and comprehensive study of characterization techniques will be beneficial. Various in situ analysis techniques will be helpful in monitoring the structural changes in MX2 during the intercalation of foreign species. Real-time measurements can provide important dynamic information regarding the origin of interlayer expansion. Density functional theory calculation is another useful method for understanding the role of interlayer engineering by quantitatively predicting the dependence of material properties on the interlayer spacing and intercalated species. The strategies and results summarized in this review will provide a guideline for realizing the potential applications of TMDs in future AMMIBs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.H. and V.P.H.H.; validation, Y.N.A.; investigation, V.P.H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, V.P.H.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.N.A. and J.H.; supervision, J.H.; funding acquisition, J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20194030202290) and the Gachon University research fund of 2019 (GCU-2019-0359).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jiao, Y.; Kang, L.; Berry-Gair, J.; McColl, K.; Li, J.; Dong, H.; Jiang, H.; Wang, R.; Corà, F.; Brett, D.J.L.; et al. Enabling stable MnO2 matrix for aqueous zinc-ion battery cathodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 22075–22082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pan, H.; Shao, Y.; Yan, P.; Cheng, Y.; Han, K.S.; Nie, Z.; Wang, C.; Yang, J.; Li, X.; Bhattacharya, P.; et al. Reversible aqueous zinc/manganese oxide energy storage from conversion reactions. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zampardi, G.; La Mantia, F. Prussian blue analogues as aqueous Zn-ion batteries electrodes: Current challenges and future perspectives. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 21, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Scrosati, B.; Garche, J. Lithium batteries: Status, prospects and future. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 2419–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Goodenough, J.B.; Park, K.-S. The Li-Ion Rechargeable Battery: A Perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Winter, M.; Barnett, B.; Xu, K. Before Li Ion Batteries. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 11433–11456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mun, Y.S.; Pham, T.N.; Hoang Bui, V.K.; Tanaji, S.T.; Lee, H.U.; Lee, G.-W.; Choi, J.S.; Kim, I.T.; Lee, Y.-C. Tin oxide evolution by heat-treatment with tin-aminoclay (SnAC) under argon condition for lithium-ion battery (LIB) anode applications. J. Power Sources 2019, 437, 226946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nguyen, T.L.; Park, D.; Kim, I.T. Fe(x)Sn(y)O(z) Composites as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Storage. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 6636–6640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Nguyen, T.L.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, I.T. Electrochemical Performance of Sn/SnO/Ni3Sn Composite Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 1001–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pham, T.N.; Tanaji, S.T.; Choi, J.-S.; Lee, H.U.; Kim, I.T.; Lee, Y.-C. Preparation of Sn-aminoclay (SnAC)-templated Fe3O4 nanoparticles as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 10536–10545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Nguyen, T.P.; Kim, I.T. Ag Nanoparticle-Decorated MoS(2) Nanosheets for Enhancing Electrochemical Performance in Lithium Storage. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nguyen, T.P.; Kim, I.T. Self-Assembled Few-Layered MoS(2) on SnO(2) Anode for Enhancing Lithium-Ion Storage. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Preman, A.N.; Lee, H.; Yoo, J.; Kim, I.T.; Saito, T.; Ahn, S.-k. Progress of 3D network binders in silicon anodes for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 25548–25570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nguyen, T.P.; Kim, I.T. W2C/WS2 Alloy Nanoflowers as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Storage. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, W.S.; Vo, T.N.; Kim, I.T. GeTe-TiC-C Composite Anodes for Li-Ion Storage. Materials 2020, 13, 4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vo, T.N.; Kim, D.S.; Mun, Y.S.; Lee, H.J.; Ahn, S.-K.; Kim, I.T. Fast charging sodium-ion batteries based on Te-P-C composites and insights to low-frequency limits of four common equivalent impedance circuits. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 398, 125703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yabuuchi, N.; Kubota, K.; Dahbi, M.; Komaba, S. Research Development on Sodium-Ion Batteries. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11636–11682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pramudita, J.C.; Sehrawat, D.; Goonetilleke, D.; Sharma, N. An Initial Review of the Status of Electrode Materials for Potassium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, Z.; Xie, J.; Xu, Z.J.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Q. Recent progress in metal–organic polymers as promising electrodes for lithium/sodium rechargeable batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 4259–4290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, S.; Sun, C.; Wang, N.; Zhang, Q. Ni- and/or Mn-based layered transition metal oxides as cathode materials for sodium ion batteries: Status, challenges and countermeasures. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 10138–10158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xiong, W.; Huang, W.; Zhang, M.; Hu, P.; Cui, H.; Zhang, Q. Pillar[5]quinone–Carbon Nanocomposites as High-Capacity Cathodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 8069–8075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ponrouch, A.; Bitenc, J.; Dominko, R.; Lindahl, N.; Johansson, P.; Palacin, M.R. Multivalent rechargeable batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 20, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Song, M.; Tan, H.; Chao, D.; Fan, H.J. Recent Advances in Zn-Ion Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1802564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, W.; Hao, J.; Xu, C.; Mou, J.; Dong, L.; Jiang, F.; Kang, Z.; Wu, J.; Jiang, B.; Kang, F. Investigation of zinc ion storage of transition metal oxides, sulfides, and borides in zinc ion battery systems. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 6872–6874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, H.; Yu, D.; Kuang, C.; Cheng, L.; Li, W.; Feng, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y. Alkali Metal Anodes for Rechargeable Batteries. Chem 2019, 5, 313–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Stoddart, A. Alkali metal batteries: Preventing failure. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 18021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, H.; Ma, L.; Han, C.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Tang, Z.; Zhi, C. Advanced rechargeable zinc-based batteries: Recent progress and future perspectives. Nano Energy 2019, 62, 550–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fang, G.; Zhou, J.; Pan, A.; Liang, S. Recent Advances in Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2480–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Konarov, A.; Voronina, N.; Jo, J.H.; Bakenov, Z.; Sun, Y.-K.; Myung, S.-T. Present and Future Perspective on Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Zinc-Ion Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2620–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Selvakumaran, D.; Pan, A.; Liang, S.; Cao, G. A review on recent developments and challenges of cathode materials for rechargeable aqueous Zn-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 18209–18236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Muldoon, J.; Bucur, C.B.; Gregory, T. Quest for Nonaqueous Multivalent Secondary Batteries: Magnesium and Beyond. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11683–11720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cai, T.; Zhao, L.; Hu, H.; Li, T.; Li, X.; Guo, S.; Li, Y.; Xue, Q.; Xing, W.; Yan, Z.; et al. Stable CoSe2/carbon nanodice@reduced graphene oxide composites for high-performance rechargeable aluminum-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 2341–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gummow, R.J.; Vamvounis, G.; Kannan, M.B.; He, Y. Calcium-Ion Batteries: Current State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yu, X.; Prévot, M.S.; Guijarro, N.; Sivula, K. Self-assembled 2D WSe2 thin films for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wu, W.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, F.; Lin, L.; Niu, S.; Chenet, D.; Zhang, X.; Hao, Y.; Heinz, T.F.; et al. Piezoelectricity of single-atomic-layer MoS2 for energy conversion and piezotronics. Nature 2014, 514, 470–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, B.; Chao, D.; Liu, E.; Jaroniec, M.; Zhao, N.; Qiao, S.-Z. Transition metal dichalcogenides for alkali metal ion batteries: Engineering strategies at the atomic level. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 1096–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yuan, H.; Kong, L.; Li, T.; Zhang, Q. A review of transition metal chalcogenide/graphene nanocomposites for energy storage and conversion. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2017, 28, 2180–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Voiry, D.; Yang, J.; Chhowalla, M. Recent Strategies for Improving the Catalytic Activity of 2D TMD Nanosheets toward the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 6197–6206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chhowalla, M.; Shin, H.S.; Eda, G.; Li, L.-J.; Loh, K.P.; Zhang, H. The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Choi, W.; Choudhary, N.; Han, G.H.; Park, J.; Akinwande, D.; Lee, Y.H. Recent development of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides and their applications. Mater. Today 2017, 20, 116–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, W.; Lee, C.-S. Interlayer Nanoarchitectonics of Two-Dimensional Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides Nanosheets for Energy Storage and Conversion Applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Huang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Zhang, H. Metal dichalcogenide nanosheets: Preparation, properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 1934–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zeng, X.; Hao, J.; Wang, Z.; Mao, J.; Guo, Z. Recent progress and perspectives on aqueous Zn-based rechargeable batteries with mild aqueous electrolytes. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 20, 410–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Huang, S.; Du, P.; Min, C.; Liao, Y.; Sun, H.; Jiang, Y. Poly(1-amino-5-chloroanthraquinone): Highly Selective and Ultrasensitive Fluorescent Chemosensor For Ferric Ion. J. Fluoresc. 2013, 23, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liu, T.; Cheng, X.; Yu, H.; Zhu, H.; Peng, N.; Zheng, R.; Zhang, J.; Shui, M.; Cui, Y.; Shu, J. An overview and future perspectives of aqueous rechargeable polyvalent ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 18, 68–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, Q.; Bjerrum, N.J. Aluminum as anode for energy storage and conversion: A review. J. Power Sources 2002, 110, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, S.; Du, Y.; Sun, S. Transition metal dichalcogenide based nanomaterials for rechargeable batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 307, 189–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yun, Q.; Li, L.; Hu, Z.; Lu, Q.; Chen, B.; Zhang, H. Layered Transition Metal Dichalcogenide-Based Nanomaterials for Electrochemical Energy Storage. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1903826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rashad, M.; Asif, M.; Wang, Y.; He, Z.; Ahmed, I. Recent advances in electrolytes and cathode materials for magnesium and hybrid-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 25, 342–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jellinek, F. Transition metal chalcogenides. relationship between chemical composition, crystal structure and physical properties. React. Solids 1988, 5, 323–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stephenson, T.; Li, Z.; Olsen, B.; Mitlin, D. Lithium ion battery applications of molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanocomposites. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 209–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shi, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chang, W.-H.; Shin, H.; Li, L. Synthesis and structure of two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides. MRS Bull. 2015, 40, 566–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Voiry, D.; Mohite, A.; Chhowalla, M. Phase engineering of transition metal dichalcogenides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2702–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Han, S.A.; Bhatia, R.; Kim, S.-W. Synthesis, properties and potential applications of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Converg. 2015, 2, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Zhang, G.; Liu, H.; Qu, J.; Li, J. Two-dimensional layered MoS2: Rational design, properties and electrochemical applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1190–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Manzeli, S.; Ovchinnikov, D.; Pasquier, D.; Yazyev, O.V.; Kis, A. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wei, Z.; Li, B.; Xia, C.; Cui, Y.; He, J.; Xia, J.-B.; Li, J. Various Structures of 2D Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides and Their Applications. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1800094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, Q.; Mei, L.; Cao, X.; Tang, Y.; Zeng, Z. Intercalation and exfoliation chemistries of transition metal dichalcogenides. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 15417–15444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lee, W.S.V.; Xiong, T.; Wang, X.; Xue, J. Unraveling MoS2 and Transition Metal Dichalcogenides as Functional Zinc-Ion Battery Cathode: A Perspective. Small Methods 2021, 5, 2000815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, Q.H.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J.N.; Strano, M.S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 699–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Coogan, Á.; Gun’ko, Y.K. Solution-based “bottom-up” synthesis of group VI transition metal dichalcogenides and their applications. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 146–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Song, I.; Park, C.; Choi, H.C. Synthesis and properties of molybdenum disulphide: From bulk to atomic layers. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 7495–7514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Eda, G.; Yamaguchi, H.; Voiry, D.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M.; Chhowalla, M. Photoluminescence from Chemically Exfoliated MoS2. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 5111–5116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Schmidt, H.; Giustiniano, F.; Eda, G. Electronic transport properties of transition metal dichalcogenide field-effect devices: Surface and interface effects. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 7715–7736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Huang, X.; Yin, Z.; Wu, S.; Qi, X.; He, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, Q.; Boey, F.; Zhang, H. Graphene-Based Materials: Synthesis, Characterization, Properties, and Applications. Small 2011, 7, 1876–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, H. Ultrathin Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 9451–9469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tan, C.; Cao, X.; Wu, X.-J.; He, Q.; Yang, J.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Zhao, W.; Han, S.; Nam, G.-H.; et al. Recent Advances in Ultrathin Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 6225–6331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tan, C.; Zhang, H. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheet-based composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2713–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lu, Q.; Yu, Y.; Ma, Q.; Chen, B.; Zhang, H. 2D Transition-Metal-Dichalcogenide-Nanosheet-Based Composites for Photocatalytic and Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reactions. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1917–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Lin, L.; Lei, W.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Wallace, G.G.; Chen, J. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides in supercapacitors and secondary batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 19, 408–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yu, X.; Yun, S.; Yeon, J.S.; Bhattacharya, P.; Wang, L.; Lee, S.W.; Hu, X.; Park, H.S. Emergent Pseudocapacitance of 2D Nanomaterials. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chen, J.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, W.; Qiao, Y.; Cao, X.; Xie, X.; Zhou, H.; Pan, A.; Liang, S. Tuning Interface Bridging between MoSe2 and Three-Dimensional Carbon Framework by Incorporation of MoC Intermediate to Boost Lithium Storage Capability. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020, 12, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tansel, B. Significance of thermodynamic and physical characteristics on permeation of ions during membrane separation: Hydrated radius, hydration free energy and viscous effects. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 86, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liu, J.; Xu, P.; Liang, J.; Liu, H.; Peng, W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, F.; Fan, X. Boosting aqueous zinc-ion storage in MoS2 via controllable phase. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 389, 124405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ming, J.; Guo, J.; Xia, C.; Wang, W.; Alshareef, H.N. Zinc-ion batteries: Materials, mechanisms, and applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2019, 135, 58–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liang, H.; Cao, Z.; Ming, F.; Zhang, W.; Anjum, D.H.; Cui, Y.; Cavallo, L.; Alshareef, H.N. Aqueous Zinc-Ion Storage in MoS2 by Tuning the Intercalation Energy. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 3199–3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Li, H.; Yang, Q.; Mo, F.; Liang, G.; Liu, Z.; Tang, Z.; Ma, L.; Liu, J.; Shi, Z.; Zhi, C. MoS2 nanosheets with expanded interlayer spacing for rechargeable aqueous Zn-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 19, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Xu, W.; Sun, C.; Zhao, K.; Cheng, X.; Rawal, S.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Y. Defect engineering activating (Boosting) zinc storage capacity of MoS2. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 16, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yang, Y. Synthesis and Properties of Halloysite Templated Tubular MoS2 as Cathode Material for Rechargeable Aqueous Zn-ion Batteries. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2020, 15, 6052–6059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. He, P.; Yan, M.; Zhang, G.; Sun, R.; Chen, L.; An, Q.; Mai, L. Layered VS2 Nanosheet-Based Aqueous Zn Ion Battery Cathode. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1601920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Jiao, T.; Yang, Q.; Wu, S.; Wang, Z.; Chen, D.; Shen, D.; Liu, B.; Cheng, J.; Li, H.; Ma, L.; et al. Binder-free hierarchical VS2 electrodes for high-performance aqueous Zn ion batteries towards commercial level mass loading. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 16330–16338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wu, Z.; Lu, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, L.; Tian, W.; Cai, C.; Gu, Q.; Sun, Z.; Hu, L. Ultrathin VSe2 Nanosheets with Fast Ion Diffusion and Robust Structural Stability for Rechargeable Zinc-Ion Battery Cathode. Small 2020, 16, 2000698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zhu, Q.; Xiao, Q.; Zhang, B.; Yan, Z.; Liu, X.; Chen, S.; Ren, Z.; Yu, Y. VS4 with a chain crystal structure used as an intercalation cathode for aqueous Zn-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 10761–10766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Aurbach, D.; Lu, Z.; Schechter, A.; Gofer, Y.; Gizbar, H.; Turgeman, R.; Cohen, Y.; Moshkovich, M.; Levi, E. Prototype systems for rechargeable magnesium batteries. Nature 2000, 407, 724–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Liu, Y.; He, G.; Jiang, H.; Parkin, I.P.; Shearing, P.R.; Brett, D.J.L. Cathode Design for Aqueous Rechargeable Multivalent Ion Batteries: Challenges and Opportunities. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2010445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yang, S.; Li, D.; Zhang, T.; Tao, Z.; Chen, J. First-Principles Study of Zigzag MoS2 Nanoribbon as a Promising Cathode Material for Rechargeable Mg Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 1307–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Liang, Y.; Feng, R.; Yang, S.; Ma, H.; Liang, J.; Chen, J. Rechargeable Mg Batteries with Graphene-like MoS2 Cathode and Ultrasmall Mg Nanoparticle Anode. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 640–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liu, Y.; Jiao, L.; Wu, Q.; Du, J.; Zhao, Y.; Si, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, H. Sandwich-structured graphene-like MoS2/C microspheres for rechargeable Mg batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 5822–5826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Truong, Q.D.; Kempaiah Devaraju, M.; Nakayasu, Y.; Tamura, N.; Sasaki, Y.; Tomai, T.; Honma, I. Exfoliated MoS2 and MoSe2 Nanosheets by a Supercritical Fluid Process for a Hybrid Mg–Li-Ion Battery. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 2360–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Mao, M.; Ji, X.; Hou, S.; Gao, T.; Wang, F.; Chen, L.; Fan, X.; Chen, J.; Ma, J.; Wang, C. Tuning Anionic Chemistry to Improve Kinetics of Mg Intercalation. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 3183–3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Gu, Y.; Katsura, Y.; Yoshino, T.; Takagi, H.; Taniguchi, K. Rechargeable magnesium-ion battery based on a TiSe2-cathode with d-p orbital hybridized electronic structure. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Xu, J.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; He, M.; Huang, K. Hierarchical WSe2 nanoflower as a cathode material for rechargeable Mg-ion batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 588, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Guduru, R.K.; Icaza, J.C. A Brief Review on Multivalent Intercalation Batteries with Aqueous Electrolytes. Nanomaterials 2016, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Liu, S.; Hu, J.J.; Yan, N.F.; Pan, G.L.; Li, G.R.; Gao, X.P. Aluminum storage behavior of anatase TiO2 nanotube arrays in aqueous solution for aluminum ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 9743–9746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. He, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Wang, Z.; Yang, T.; Liu, Z.; Liang, Y.; Wang, B.; Liu, S.; et al. A High-Energy Aqueous Aluminum-Manganese Battery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1905228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lahan, H.; Boruah, R.; Hazarika, A.; Das, S.K. Anatase TiO2 as an Anode Material for Rechargeable Aqueous Aluminum-Ion Batteries: Remarkable Graphene Induced Aluminum Ion Storage Phenomenon. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 26241–26249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. He, Y.J.; Peng, J.F.; Chu, W.; Li, Y.Z.; Tong, D.G. Retracted Article: Black mesoporous anatase TiO2 nanoleaves: A high capacity and high rate anode for aqueous Al-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 1721–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Liu, S.; Pan, G.L.; Li, G.R.; Gao, X.P. Copper hexacyanoferrate nanoparticles as cathode material for aqueous Al-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 959–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhou, A.; Jiang, L.; Yue, J.; Tong, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Lin, Z.; Liu, B.; Wu, C.; Suo, L.; Hu, Y.-S.; et al. Water-in-Salt Electrolyte Promotes High-Capacity FeFe(CN)6 Cathode for Aqueous Al-Ion Battery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 41356–41362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhao, Q.; Zachman, M.J.; Al Sadat, W.I.; Zheng, J.; Kourkoutis, L.F.; Archer, L. Solid electrolyte interphases for high-energy aqueous aluminum electrochemical cells. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaau8131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Wu, C.; Gu, S.; Zhang, Q.; Bai, Y.; Li, M.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, X.; Yuan, Y.; Zhu, N.; et al. Electrochemically activated spinel manganese oxide for rechargeable aqueous aluminum battery. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Pan, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Kwok, H.Y.H.; Wu, M.; Zhao, X.; Leung, D.Y.C. A low-cost and dendrite-free rechargeable aluminium-ion battery with superior performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 17420–17425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Fan, X.; Gaddam, R.R.; Kumar, N.A.; Zhao, X.S. A Hybrid Mg2+/Li+ Battery Based on Interlayer-Expanded MoS2/Graphene Cathode. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Li, Z.; Niu, B.; Liu, J.; Li, J.; Kang, F. Rechargeable Aluminum-Ion Battery Based on MoS2 Microsphere Cathode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 9451–9459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Divya, S.; Johnston, J.H.; Nann, T. Molybdenum Dichalcogenide Cathodes for Aluminum-Ion Batteries. Energy Technol. 2020, 8, 2000038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Wu, L.; Sun, R.; Xiong, F.; Pei, C.; Han, K.; Peng, C.; Fan, Y.; Yang, W.; An, Q.; Mai, L. A rechargeable aluminum-ion battery based on a VS2 nanosheet cathode. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 22563–22568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Geng, L.; Scheifers, J.P.; Fu, C.; Zhang, J.; Fokwa, B.P.T.; Guo, J. Titanium Sulfides as Intercalation-Type Cathode Materials for Rechargeable Aluminum Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 21251–21257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Geng, L.; Lv, G.; Xing, X.; Guo, J. Reversible Electrochemical Intercalation of Aluminum in Mo6S8. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 4926–4929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kundu, D.; Adams, B.D.; Duffort, V.; Vajargah, S.H.; Nazar, L.F. A high-capacity and long-life aqueous rechargeable zinc battery using a metal oxide intercalation cathode. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bin, D.; Huo, W.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, F.; Wang, Y.; Xia, Y. Organic-Inorganic-Induced Polymer Intercalation into Layered Composites for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery. Chem 2020, 6, 968–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Jung, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Cha, J.J. Intercalation in two-dimensional transition metal chalcogenides. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 452–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhang, J.; Yang, A.; Wu, X.; van de Groep, J.; Tang, P.; Li, S.; Liu, B.; Shi, F.; Wan, J.; Li, Q.; et al. Reversible and selective ion intercalation through the top surface of few-layer MoS2. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Gu, J.; Zhu, Q.; Shi, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhang, D.; Du, Z.; Yang, S. Single Zinc Atoms Immobilized on MXene (Ti3C2Clx) Layers toward Dendrite-Free Lithium Metal Anodes. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 891–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Shi, H.-Y.; Sun, X. Interlayer Engineering of Layered Cathode Materials for Advanced Zn Storage. Chem 2020, 6, 817–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Winchester, A.; Ghosh, S.; Feng, S.; Elias, A.L.; Mallouk, T.; Terrones, M.; Talapatra, S. Electrochemical Characterization of Liquid Phase Exfoliated Two-Dimensional Layers of Molybdenum Disulfide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 2125–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Bang, G.S.; Nam, K.W.; Kim, J.Y.; Shin, J.; Choi, J.W.; Choi, S.-Y. Effective Liquid-Phase Exfoliation and Sodium Ion Battery Application of MoS2 Nanosheets. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 7084–7089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Coleman, J.N.; Lotya, M.; O’Neill, A.; Bergin, S.D.; King, P.J.; Khan, U.; Young, K.; Gaucher, A.; De, S.; Smith, R.J.; et al. Two-Dimensional Nanosheets Produced by Liquid Exfoliation of Layered Materials. Science 2011, 331, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Smith, R.J.; King, P.J.; Lotya, M.; Wirtz, C.; Khan, U.; De, S.; O’Neill, A.; Duesberg, G.S.; Grunlan, J.C.; Moriarty, G.; et al. Large-Scale Exfoliation of Inorganic Layered Compounds in Aqueous Surfactant Solutions. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3944–3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Shmeliov, A.; Shannon, M.; Wang, P.; Kim, J.S.; Okunishi, E.; Nellist, P.D.; Dolui, K.; Sanvito, S.; Nicolosi, V. Unusual Stacking Variations in Liquid-Phase Exfoliated Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 3690–3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Paton, K.R.; Varrla, E.; Backes, C.; Smith, R.J.; Khan, U.; O’Neill, A.; Boland, C.; Lotya, M.; Istrate, O.M.; King, P.; et al. Scalable production of large quantities of defect-free few-layer graphene by shear exfoliation in liquids. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 624–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Rangappa, D.; Sone, K.; Wang, M.; Gautam, U.K.; Golberg, D.; Itoh, H.; Ichihara, M.; Honma, I. Rapid and Direct Conversion of Graphite Crystals into High-Yielding, Good-Quality Graphene by Supercritical Fluid Exfoliation. Chem. A Eur. J. 2010, 16, 6488–6494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Rangappa, D.; Murukanahally, K.D.; Tomai, T.; Unemoto, A.; Honma, I. Ultrathin Nanosheets of Li2MSiO4 (M = Fe, Mn) as High-Capacity Li-Ion Battery Electrode. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 1146–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Truong, Q.D.; Devaraju, M.K.; Honma, I. Benzylamine-directed growth of olivine-type LiMPO4 nanoplates by a supercritical ethanol process for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 17400–17407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Huang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Tang, C.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J. Atomic Modulation and Structure Design of Carbons for Bifunctional Electrocatalysis in Metal–Air Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1803800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Uchaker, E.; Cao, G. The Role of Intentionally Introduced Defects on Electrode Materials for Alkali-Ion Batteries. Chem. Asian J. 2015, 10, 1608–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Zhang, Y.; Guo, L.; Tao, L.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. Defect-Based Single-Atom Electrocatalysts. Small Methods 2019, 3, 1800406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Banhart, F.; Kotakoski, J.; Krasheninnikov, A.V. Structural Defects in Graphene. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Fang, Z.; Bueken, B.; De Vos, D.E.; Fischer, R.A. Defect-Engineered Metal–Organic Frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 7234–7254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Lin, Z.; Carvalho, B.R.; Kahn, E.; Lv, R.; Rao, R.; Terrones, H.; Pimenta, M.A.; Terrones, M. Defect engineering of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. 2D Mater. 2016, 3, 022002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Matsunaga, K.; Tanaka, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Ikuhara, Y. First-principles calculations of intrinsic defects in Al2O3. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 68, 085110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Meggiolaro, D.; Mosconi, E.; De Angelis, F. Formation of Surface Defects Dominates Ion Migration in Lead-Halide Perovskites. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 779–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Paier, J.; Penschke, C.; Sauer, J. Oxygen Defects and Surface Chemistry of Ceria: Quantum Chemical Studies Compared to Experiment. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 3949–3985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Wilby, A.; Neale, D. Defects Introduced into Metals during Fabrication and Service. 2011. Available online: http://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C05/E6-36-04-01.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2012).
  135. Xiong, T.; Yu, Z.G.; Wu, H.; Du, Y.; Xie, Q.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.-W.; Pennycook, S.J.; Lee, W.S.V.; Xue, J. Defect Engineering of Oxygen-Deficient Manganese Oxide to Achieve High-Performing Aqueous Zinc Ion Battery. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1803815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Huang, X.; Qi, X.; Boey, F.; Zhang, H. Graphene-based composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 666–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Luo, Z.; Huang, X.; Tan, C.; Li, H.; Zheng, B.; Li, B.; Huang, Y.; Yang, J.; et al. Liquid-phase growth of platinum nanoparticles on molybdenum trioxide nanosheets: An enhanced catalyst with intrinsic peroxidase-like catalytic activity. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 12340–12344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Deng, Z.; Jiang, H.; Li, C. 2D Metal Chalcogenides Incorporated into Carbon and their Assembly for Energy Storage Applications. Small 2018, 14, 1800148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lou, X.W.; Li, C.M.; Archer, L.A. Designed Synthesis of Coaxial SnO2@carbon Hollow Nanospheres for Highly Reversible Lithium Storage. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2536–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Qi, X.; Liu, N.; Lian, Y. Carbonaceous microspheres prepared by hydrothermal carbonization of glucose for direct use in catalytic dehydration of fructose. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 17526–17531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Chen, Y.; Song, B.; Tang, X.; Lu, L.; Xue, J. Ultrasmall Fe3O4 Nanoparticle/MoS2 Nanosheet Composites with Superior Performances for Lithium Ion Batteries. Small 2014, 10, 1536–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Gong, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhan, L.; Ma, L.; Vajtai, R.; Ajayan, P.M. A Bottom-Up Approach to Build 3D Architectures from Nanosheets for Superior Lithium Storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zhu, C.; Mu, X.; van Aken, P.A.; Yu, Y.; Maier, J. Single-Layered Ultrasmall Nanoplates of MoS2 Embedded in Carbon Nanofibers with Excellent Electrochemical Performance for Lithium and Sodium Storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 2152–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Yang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Tang, Z.; Wang, X. Nanosheet-assembled MoSe2 and S-doped MoSe2−x nanostructures for superior lithium storage properties and hydrogen evolution reactions. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2015, 2, 931–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Fan, X.; Xu, P.; Li, Y.C.; Zhou, D.; Sun, Y.; Nguyen, M.A.T.; Terrones, M.; Mallouk, T.E. Controlled Exfoliation of MoS2 Crystals into Trilayer Nanosheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 5143–5149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Tang, Q.; Jiang, D.-E. Mechanism of Hydrogen Evolution Reaction on 1T-MoS2 from First Principles. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 4953–4961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Lei, Z.; Zhan, J.; Tang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. Recent Development of Metallic (1T) Phase of Molybdenum Disulfide for Energy Conversion and Storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1703482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Wang, R.; Yu, Y.; Zhou, S.; Li, H.; Wong, H.; Luo, Z.; Gan, L.; Zhai, T. Strategies on Phase Control in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1802473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Yin, Y.; Han, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xu, P.; Yuan, Q.; Samad, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Contributions of Phase, Sulfur Vacancies, and Edges to the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Catalytic Activity of Porous Molybdenum Disulfide Nanosheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7965–7972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Tan, C.; Luo, Z.; Chaturvedi, A.; Cai, Y.; Du, Y.; Gong, Y.; Huang, Y.; Lai, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, L.; et al. Preparation of High-Percentage 1T-Phase Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Nanodots for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Liu, J.; Chen, T.; Juan, P.; Peng, W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, F.; Fan, X. Hierarchical Cobalt Borate/MXenes Hybrid with Extraordinary Electrocatalytic Performance in Oxygen Evolution Reaction. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 3758–3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Xu, D.; Zhu, Y.; Peng, W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, F.; Fan, X. Hierarchical “nanoroll” like MoS2/Ti3C2Tx hybrid with high electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 241, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Chang, K.; Hai, X.; Pang, H.; Zhang, H.; Shi, L.; Liu, G.; Liu, H.; Zhao, G.; Li, M.; Ye, J. Targeted Synthesis of 2H- and 1T-Phase MoS2 Monolayers for Catalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 10033–10041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Brief summary of recent reviews on transition metal dichalcogenides (TMD) materials, (b) Year-wise publication plot for TMD materials including MoS2, VS2, WS2, and TiS2 in the period of 2010–2020. (searched by Google Scholar, 2 June 2021), (c) The applications of TMDs in the period of 2010–2020.
Figure 1. (a) Brief summary of recent reviews on transition metal dichalcogenides (TMD) materials, (b) Year-wise publication plot for TMD materials including MoS2, VS2, WS2, and TiS2 in the period of 2010–2020. (searched by Google Scholar, 2 June 2021), (c) The applications of TMDs in the period of 2010–2020.
Nanomaterials 11 01517 g001
Figure 2. (a) TMDs with the MX2 structure consisting of M from the 16 transition metals indicated by the red dotted box and X from the three halogen elements indicated by the green dotted box, (b) layered structure of MX2.
Figure 2. (a) TMDs with the MX2 structure consisting of M from the 16 transition metals indicated by the red dotted box and X from the three halogen elements indicated by the green dotted box, (b) layered structure of MX2.
Nanomaterials 11 01517 g002
Figure 3. (a) Polytype structure of TMDs (1T, 2H, and 3R). Reprinted with permission from Coogan et al. [61] Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry. (b) Polytype structure of MoS2. Reprinted with permission from Song et al. [62] Copyright 2015, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 3. (a) Polytype structure of TMDs (1T, 2H, and 3R). Reprinted with permission from Coogan et al. [61] Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry. (b) Polytype structure of MoS2. Reprinted with permission from Song et al. [62] Copyright 2015, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Nanomaterials 11 01517 g003
Figure 4. Direct bandgap and interlayer distance of various types of TMD.
Figure 4. Direct bandgap and interlayer distance of various types of TMD.
Nanomaterials 11 01517 g004
Figure 5. (a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of MoS2 (left:MoS2 with oxygen incorporation, right: bulk MoS2). (b) cyclic voltammetry curves of MoS2-O (pink) and bulk MoS2 (light blue) at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. (c) Rate capability of MoS2-O and bulk MoS2 at various current densities. Reprinted with permission from Liang et al. [77] Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (d) Illustration for the preparation of E-MoS2. (e) Rate capability of E-MoS2 at various current densities. Reprinted with permission from Li et al. [78] Copyright 2018, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 5. (a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of MoS2 (left:MoS2 with oxygen incorporation, right: bulk MoS2). (b) cyclic voltammetry curves of MoS2-O (pink) and bulk MoS2 (light blue) at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. (c) Rate capability of MoS2-O and bulk MoS2 at various current densities. Reprinted with permission from Liang et al. [77] Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (d) Illustration for the preparation of E-MoS2. (e) Rate capability of E-MoS2 at various current densities. Reprinted with permission from Li et al. [78] Copyright 2018, Elsevier B.V.
Nanomaterials 11 01517 g005
Figure 6. (a) TEM image of defect-rich MoS2 nanosheets, (b) cyclic performance of defect-rich MoS2 nanosheets at 200 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Xu et al. [79] Copyright 2018, Elsevier B.V. (c) TEM image of tubular MoS2, (d) cyclic performance of tubular MoS2 at 500 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Yang et al. [80] Copyright 2020, ESG Publication.
Figure 6. (a) TEM image of defect-rich MoS2 nanosheets, (b) cyclic performance of defect-rich MoS2 nanosheets at 200 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Xu et al. [79] Copyright 2018, Elsevier B.V. (c) TEM image of tubular MoS2, (d) cyclic performance of tubular MoS2 at 500 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Yang et al. [80] Copyright 2020, ESG Publication.
Nanomaterials 11 01517 g006
Figure 9. (a) TEM image of freestanding MoS2-graphene foam composite with glucose (E-MG), (b) cyclic performance of bulk-MoS2, MoS2-graphene foam without glucose (MG), and E-MG at 20 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Fan et al. [104] Copyright 2017, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (c) Schematic of the MoX2 structure (X: S, Se) with M1 and M2 site, (d) coulombic efficiency of MoX2 at 100 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Divya et al. [106] Copyright 2020, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Figure 9. (a) TEM image of freestanding MoS2-graphene foam composite with glucose (E-MG), (b) cyclic performance of bulk-MoS2, MoS2-graphene foam without glucose (MG), and E-MG at 20 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Fan et al. [104] Copyright 2017, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (c) Schematic of the MoX2 structure (X: S, Se) with M1 and M2 site, (d) coulombic efficiency of MoX2 at 100 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Divya et al. [106] Copyright 2020, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Nanomaterials 11 01517 g009
Figure 10. Cyclic performance of (a) TiS2 and (b) Cu0.31Ti2S4 at room temperature and 50 °C at 5 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Geng et al. [108] Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society. (c) Schematic structure of Al insertion sites in Mo6S8, (d) cyclic performance of Mo6S8. Reprinted with permission from Geng et al. [109] Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.
Figure 10. Cyclic performance of (a) TiS2 and (b) Cu0.31Ti2S4 at room temperature and 50 °C at 5 mA g−1. Reprinted with permission from Geng et al. [108] Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society. (c) Schematic structure of Al insertion sites in Mo6S8, (d) cyclic performance of Mo6S8. Reprinted with permission from Geng et al. [109] Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.
Nanomaterials 11 01517 g010
Figure 11. (a) Schematic showing the difficulty in the intercalation of Zn hydrates into bulk MoS2 owing to the large energy barrier between the layers, (b) the expanded interlayer distance that supports the diffusion of Zn2+, (c) hydrophobicity control by the Zn–H2O–O interaction, (d) theoretical energy barrier between MoS2 and MoS2–O depending on the hydration level of Zn2+. Reprinted with permission from Liang et al. [77] Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Figure 11. (a) Schematic showing the difficulty in the intercalation of Zn hydrates into bulk MoS2 owing to the large energy barrier between the layers, (b) the expanded interlayer distance that supports the diffusion of Zn2+, (c) hydrophobicity control by the Zn–H2O–O interaction, (d) theoretical energy barrier between MoS2 and MoS2–O depending on the hydration level of Zn2+. Reprinted with permission from Liang et al. [77] Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Nanomaterials 11 01517 g011
Figure 12. (a) Schematic diagram of the supercritical fluid (SCF) procedure to synthesize TMDs. Reprinted with permission from Truong et al. [90] Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.(b) Illustration of two Mg adsorption positions (H and T sites) on MoS2 nanoribbon:. Reprinted with permission from Yang et al. [87] Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society.
Figure 12. (a) Schematic diagram of the supercritical fluid (SCF) procedure to synthesize TMDs. Reprinted with permission from Truong et al. [90] Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.(b) Illustration of two Mg adsorption positions (H and T sites) on MoS2 nanoribbon:. Reprinted with permission from Yang et al. [87] Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society.
Nanomaterials 11 01517 g012
Figure 13. (a) Schematic for the synthesis of E-MG. (b) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of free-standing MoS2/graphene foam. Reprinted with permission from Fan et al. [104] Copyright 2017, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (c) The atomic structure with the expanded interlayer distance of MoS2. Reprinted with permission from Li et al. [78] Copyright 2018, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 13. (a) Schematic for the synthesis of E-MG. (b) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of free-standing MoS2/graphene foam. Reprinted with permission from Fan et al. [104] Copyright 2017, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (c) The atomic structure with the expanded interlayer distance of MoS2. Reprinted with permission from Li et al. [78] Copyright 2018, Elsevier B.V.
Nanomaterials 11 01517 g013
Figure 14. (a) Schematic of a rechargeable MoS2 cathode with different phases (1T- and 2H-MoS2). (b) The adsorption sites and diffusion pathway of Zn2+ (left:2H phase MoS2and right: 1T phase MoS2). (c) Calculation of Zn2+ diffusion energy barrier on the1T and 2H phases. Reprinted with permission from Liu et al. [75] Copyright 2020, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 14. (a) Schematic of a rechargeable MoS2 cathode with different phases (1T- and 2H-MoS2). (b) The adsorption sites and diffusion pathway of Zn2+ (left:2H phase MoS2and right: 1T phase MoS2). (c) Calculation of Zn2+ diffusion energy barrier on the1T and 2H phases. Reprinted with permission from Liu et al. [75] Copyright 2020, Elsevier B.V.
Nanomaterials 11 01517 g014
Table 2. Electrochemical performance of TMDs as zinc-ion batteries (ZIB) cathodes.
Table 2. Electrochemical performance of TMDs as zinc-ion batteries (ZIB) cathodes.
TMDsInterlayer Spacing of Activated
(Å)
Specific Capacity
(mAh g−1)
Capacity Retention
(%)
CycleCurrent Density
(mA g−1)
Voltage Ranges
(V)
Comments
(Main Findings)
Ref.
MoS2-18.0-50500.1–1.9Study of zinc ion storage in pristine TMDs[24]
WS2-22.0-50500.1–1.9Study of zinc ion storage in pristine TMDs[24]
MoS2-O9.5232-201000.2–1.4Reduction in intercalation energy barrier by oxygen incorporation[77]
E-MoS27.0202.698.66001000.3–1.5A novel structure of MoS2[78]
1T-MoS26.8-98.44001000.25–1.25Effect of different phase contents on the distinct performance[75]
Defect-rich MoS26.8688.687.810001000.25–1.25Development of defect rich MoS2 nanosheets[79]
Tubular MoS26.5146.2748002000.25–1.25A novel structure of MoS2[80]
VS25.76110.9982005000.4–1.0Storage mechanism of Zn/VS2[81]
VS2@SS5.819880200020000.4–1.0Binder-free hierarchical VS2@SS electrode[82]
VSe26.1131.880.85001000.25–1.50Zinc-ion transport behavior in VSe2 nanosheets[83]
VS45.831108550025000.2–1.6Energy storage mechanism of VS4[84]
Table 3. Electrochemical performance of TMD cathodes for magnesium-ion batteries (MIBs).
Table 3. Electrochemical performance of TMD cathodes for magnesium-ion batteries (MIBs).
TMDsInterlayer Spacing of Activated
(Å)
Specific Capacity
(mAh g−1)
Capacity Retention
(%)
CycleCurrent Density
(mA g−1)
Voltage Range
(V)
Comments (Main Findings)Ref.
Zigzag MoS2-170----Study of Mg adsorption sites with DFT calculations[87]
G-WS20.7161.59550200.5–3.0A novel structure of G-MoS2 cathode and ultra-small Mg nanoparticle anode[88]
MoS2/C 1.07118.8-50500–2.4A novel structure of MoS2/C cathode and AZ31 Mg alloy anode[89]
Bulk MoS2-8168.710200.2–2.2Exfoliation of TMD into high-quality nanosheets[90]
Bulk MoSe2-5573.35200.2–2.2Exfoliation of TMD into high-quality nanosheets[90]
TiS2-8063.04050.5–2.0Kinetic study of Mg2+ migration in layered TMD[91]
TiSe2-8674.84050.5–2.0Kinetic study of Mg2+ migration in layered TMD[91]
1T-TiSe2-108-40-0.25–1.8Study of phase effect in TiSe2 on the battery performance[92]
WSe26.823991.9100500–2.5A novel WSe2 structure[93]
Table 4. Electrochemical performance of TMD cathodes for aluminum-ion batteries (AIBs).
Table 4. Electrochemical performance of TMD cathodes for aluminum-ion batteries (AIBs).
TMDsInterlayer Spacing of Activated
(Å)
Specific Capacity
(mAh g−1)
Capacity Retention
(%)
CycleCurrent Density
(mA g−1)
Voltage Range
(V)
Comments (Main Findings)Ref.
TiS2-70-5050.2–1.3Reversible insertion and extraction of Al in TiS2[108]
MoS2 (E-MG)1.087.6-120200.01–2.0A novel structure of MoS2 (E-MG)[104]
MoS26.266.7-100400.5–2.0Phase transition mechanism during the charge-discharge process in MoS2[105]
MoS26.330--1000.01–2.5Intercalation mechanism of Al3+ into MoS2[106]
G-VS25.755033.6501000.3–1.7Intercalation mechanism of Al3+ into G-VS2[107]
Mo6S8-70-50-0.1–1.2Reversible intercalation and extraction of Al3+ in Mo6S8[109]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hoang Huy, V.P.; Ahn, Y.N.; Hur, J. Recent Advances in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Cathode Materials for Aqueous Rechargeable Multivalent Metal-Ion Batteries. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061517

AMA Style

Hoang Huy VP, Ahn YN, Hur J. Recent Advances in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Cathode Materials for Aqueous Rechargeable Multivalent Metal-Ion Batteries. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(6):1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061517

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hoang Huy, Vo Pham, Yong Nam Ahn, and Jaehyun Hur. 2021. "Recent Advances in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Cathode Materials for Aqueous Rechargeable Multivalent Metal-Ion Batteries" Nanomaterials 11, no. 6: 1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061517

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop