Next Article in Journal
Reconnecting with Gaia to Understand Humanity’s Collective Trauma: Learning from Grandma Belah and Yungadhu
Previous Article in Journal
Challenges and Solutions for Corporate Social Responsibility in the Hospitality Industry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Commentary

From COVID-19 Pandemic Pivot to Progress: Blended Work as a Pathway to Greener African Cities

1
Department of Research, Repolicy Research Centre, Kigali P.O. Box 7584, Rwanda
2
AROSE Think Tank, Kigali, Rwanda
3
Department of Research and Innovation, ARNECH Research and Consulting Office, Bujumbura, Burundi
4
OAZIS Health, Kigali, Rwanda
5
Department of Biomedical Laboratory Sciences, Institut D’enseignement Superieur de Ruhengeri, Ruhengeri P.O. Box 155, Rwanda
6
Partners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali P.O. Box 3432, Rwanda
7
Department of Science of Global Health Delivery, University of Global Health Equity (UGHE), Kigali P.O. Box 6955, Rwanda
8
University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
9
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 4285, Rwanda
10
Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali P.O. Box 7162, Rwanda
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Challenges 2025, 16(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/challe16010010
Submission received: 10 December 2024 / Revised: 16 January 2025 / Accepted: 5 February 2025 / Published: 6 February 2025

Abstract

:
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, disrupted work and life patterns worldwide, underscoring the urgency of addressing climate change. Despite contributing minimally to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, Africa faces disproportionate vulnerability to the impacts of climate change. This commentary explores the benefits of blended work models (remote and in-office work) and the readiness of African cities to adopt them. Notably, the shift to working from home (WFH) during the pandemic improved individual well-being and reduced office energy consumption and commuting-related emissions. Robust digital infrastructure and organizational and sustainable policies are essential to fully leverage blended work for urban sustainability. The unexpected opportunities that arose during the pandemic could help African cities address climate change through careful planning and investment.

1. Introduction

Africa is one of the continents most vulnerable to climate change, yet its contribution to global emissions is minimal (around 3.8%). Even before the emergence of COVID-19, climate change has loomed as one of humanity’s gravest challenges, fueled by ever-increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [1,2]. These emissions have set a cascade of environmental consequences in motion, from catastrophic storms and rising sea levels to disrupted ecosystems and mass extinctions [3]. Despite international commitments to curb these emissions, like those pledged in the 2015 Paris Agreement, the current trajectory still puts us on course for a calamitous 2.7 °C temperature rise by 2100 [1].
Climate change is influenced by both natural processes and human activity. While natural cycles of climate variation have occurred over millions of years, driven by factors such as volcanic eruptions, solar radiation variations, and Earth’s orbital changes, scientific consensus now overwhelmingly attributes the rapid warming observed over the past century to human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels, deforestation, and industrial emissions [4,5]. The overwhelming evidence for anthropogenic climate change comes from a broad body of research, which shows a clear correlation between rising greenhouse gas concentrations from human activity and the acceleration of global warming [4].
The emergence of COVID-19 in late 2019 forced a global shift in how people work, live, and connect [6,7,8]. While the immediate concern was public health, COVID-19 interestingly brought attention to possible climate solutions during a worldwide health crisis. Although critics emerged on the levels of policy and inequalities, the reduction in GHG emissions received relatively limited attention [9,10]. Blended working environments emerged as a promising approach, particularly for mitigating emissions related to transportation and office energy consumption.
African cities, which face unique challenges in urbanization, infrastructure, and climate change vulnerability, stand to benefit immensely from blended work frameworks. The reduction in transportation-related emissions, which are a significant source of air pollution and GHG in many African cities, can contribute directly to improving air quality. Moreover, blended work offers an opportunity for businesses to operate more cost-effectively, allowing for the reallocation of resources that would otherwise be spent on expensive office spaces. This is particularly beneficial for African cities where infrastructure constraints and high office space costs are often prohibitive [11].
In addition to mitigating climate change, blended work models can also contribute to the broader Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by enhancing social inclusion, promoting decent work, and fostering economic growth. Furthermore, a reduction in traffic congestion can lead to improved air quality, benefiting biodiversity and public health. Therefore, by addressing multiple SDGs, blended work serves as a multifaceted solution for sustainable urban development in African cities [11,12,13].
Given their greater susceptibility to climate change impacts, African cities stand to gain from well-crafted policies that use digital connectivity to cut emissions. This perspective article aims to explore the potential of blended work models in mitigating the environmental impacts of urbanization in African cities. Specifically, we focus on reducing GHG emissions through enhanced digital connectivity and reduced mobility. We also discuss the socio-economic implications of blended work for employees, businesses, and governments. In doing so, we proffer our perspectives on the complexities of implementing such models within the unique context of Africa, considering factors like infrastructure limitations, digital divides, and socio-political challenges. While the concept of blended work has been explored globally, this paper takes a novel approach by focusing on its application within lower–middle-income African countries. The pandemic presented an unexpected but invaluable opportunity to consider the role of digital work environments in Africa’s urban sustainability efforts. Given Africa’s distinct vulnerabilities to climate change and its underdeveloped infrastructure, blended work could help African cities leapfrog traditional development stages and accelerate the transition to a greener, more resilient urban future.

2. GHG Reduction During COVID-19

Amidst the challenges posed by COVID-19, the constraints on mobility have imparted valuable insights, unveiling three key facts. Firstly, Africa contributes the lowest share of global greenhouse gas emissions (3.8%) compared to other major economies. However, it is disproportionately vulnerable to the consequences of climate change on the environment, economies, resources, and infrastructure. The continent disproportionately grapples with a multitude of climate-related threats, including unpredictable rainfall patterns, intense heat waves, rising sea levels, and depleting water resources, among others. These challenges underscore the urgency of finding sustainable solutions within the continent’s unique context [14]. While high-income countries experienced more stringent lockdowns and mobility restrictions, African cities demonstrated varying levels of compliance due to different economic and social conditions [15]. Nonetheless, even in these cities, there was a noticeable reduction in transportation-related emissions, particularly in cities like Kigali, Nairobi, and Kampala [16,17,18]. These cities, despite less stringent lockdown measures, still benefited from reduced congestion and temporary decreases in air pollution. This illustrates the potential of blended work models to achieve environmental goals even in contexts where full mobility restrictions are less feasible [19].
Secondly, the COVID-19 pandemic, despite its devastating impact on public health, inadvertently triggered a global experiment in reduced mobility. Lockdown measures enforced worldwide, including restrictions on unnecessary travel and the widespread adoption of remote work, led to a significant decline in transportation activity [20]. While the temporary shift to remote work during the pandemic was not enough to fundamentally alter the course of climate change, it did contribute to a noticeable decline in greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in the transportation sector [21]. Reduced travel, both domestic and international, resulted in fewer emissions from cars, airplanes, and other forms of transport. Similarly, working from home led to lower office energy consumption and fewer commutes, resulting in reductions in carbon emissions [22,23,24,25,26]. However, these reductions were only partial and short-lived, underscoring the need for more systemic, long-term changes to achieve meaningful climate goals. Importantly, the pandemic highlighted opportunities for structural changes in work and mobility that could be leveraged in the future to continue lowering emissions, particularly in sectors where digital infrastructure and remote work can replace physical travel.
Thirdly, the case of Kigali City offers a compelling case study. During the full COVID-19 lockdown, travel activity within the city dwindled by a staggering 80%, resulting in a remarkable 33% reduction in air pollution levels. Even partial lockdowns yielded noticeable improvements, with a 41% decrease in travel activity and a 21% drop in air pollution. These findings provide concrete evidence of the significant impact the transportation sector has on air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. While temporary lockdowns may not be a viable long-term solution, they offer valuable insights for policymakers and urban planners seeking to develop sustainable strategies for curbing emissions and fostering green mobility solutions in African cities [27]. These results show a significant impact of transport on air pollution; thus, there is a need to adopt innovative measures from this sector to reduce air pollution [20].
The reduction in GHG emissions during the COVID-19 lockdowns not only helped mitigate climate change but also contributed to the preservation of biodiversity. With reduced air pollution and fewer vehicles on the road, African cities could see a revival of urban green spaces and improvements in ecosystem health, which in turn supports SDG 15 (Life on Land) [23]. This underscores the interconnectivity between climate action and other sustainability goals.

3. Work-from-Home Benefits

Telecommuting, or remote work, is not a new phenomenon. In fact, it has its origins as far back as the 1970s when it was initially adopted to alleviate traffic congestion and reduce energy consumption, long before the widespread use of computers [28]. The advent of personal computing and the internet in the following decades further catalyzed the growth of telecommuting, making it feasible for an increasing number of jobs [29]. Today, in developed countries, a substantial proportion of jobs can be performed entirely at home, demonstrating the growing acceptance and practicality of remote work as a long-term solution to environmental and societal challenges [30]
The COVID-19 pandemic irrevocably altered the landscape of work [31]. To curb the spread of the virus, governments worldwide required people to work from home (WFH) unless they were essential workers [32,33]. This sudden shift transformed WFH from a perk for select professions to a necessity for many, becoming the only way to maintain job continuity [34]. While the pandemic’s impact on mental health and social interactions remains complex, WFH offered potential benefits for some. Individuals with secure socio-economic backgrounds saw potential stress reduction by eliminating commutes, adjusting work schedules, and spending more time with family [35]. Studies in Italy, for instance, revealed participants working from home were less stressed and equally satisfied compared to office work [36]. Even in far-flung Indonesia, research suggests that WFH could sustain job satisfaction during the pandemic, creating new normalcy for workers [37]. However, the implications of WFH extend beyond individual well-being. This mass experiment in remote work presented a unique opportunity to assess its impact on greenhouse gas emissions. With fewer cars on the road and office energy consumption reduced, the potential for significant environmental gains became evident. For small businesses particularly, embracing WFH offered additional benefits. Studies suggest it potentially lowered operating costs, mitigated supply chain disruptions, and improved cash flow [38]. These findings suggest that, beyond mitigating the immediate pandemic shock, policies promoting teleworkable jobs and WFH could be crucial instruments in combating climate change while fostering greater business resilience.

4. Blended Work: A Sustainable Approach for African Cities

The idea of blended work has gained global traction, but its full potential remains untapped in the context of African cities. Unlike high-income nations where digital infrastructures are already well established, many African countries are still struggling with internet accessibility and energy inefficiencies. This makes the case for blended work models even more urgent in Africa. Through leveraging the pandemic-driven shift to remote work, African cities have an unprecedented opportunity to develop sustainable frameworks for urbanization that not only reduce GHG emissions but also contribute to broader socio-economic resilience [11]. Beyond enhancing work–life balance and employee satisfaction, a blended work environment, incorporating both remote and office work, presents a promising avenue for reducing GHG emissions in African cities. Reduced Commuting: Fewer daily commuters mean less traffic and lower emissions. Estimates suggest that remote work could lead to a 10–20% reduction in urban congestion, directly cutting CO2 emissions [39].
Optimized Energy Use: Offices used less frequently consume less energy for lighting, heating, and ventilation, thus reducing their environmental footprint.
Green Mobility: With fewer private vehicles on the road, blended work opens the door for promoting sustainable transportation options in African cities. Increased investment in public transit, cycling infrastructure, and electric vehicle adoption becomes more feasible with reduced traffic congestion, creating a virtuous cycle of reduced emissions and improved livability.
Digital infrastructure growth: Hybrid model encourages investment in digital technologies, and thus a sustainable tech-driven economy. COVID-19 has fueled an inevitable surge in digitalization and can be leveraged for sustainable green economy in African cities.
Blended work models can help achieve several SDGs beyond climate action, including SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), SDG 10 (Reduced Inequality), and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) [13]. Through fostering digital connectivity, blended work can empower marginalized communities, provide greater economic opportunities, and reduce urban sprawl, all while supporting sustainable urban infrastructure development.
However, while the environmental benefits of blended work are promising, it is important to acknowledge that challenges remain. Telecommuting, if not well-organized, can lead to issues such as isolation, decreased work–life balance, and a lack of engagement. These issues are not insurmountable, but they require thoughtful organizational strategies, such as fostering strong communication channels, promoting employee well-being initiatives, and ensuring that managers are equipped to oversee remote teams effectively [40]. While these challenges can be mitigated, they cannot be entirely eliminated, and ongoing adjustments to work policies and support systems are essential for sustaining a healthy, productive workforce.

5. Infrastructure for Blended Work Success

The successful implementation of a blended work environment hinges on the critical foundation of robust infrastructure. This goes beyond mere technology; it encompasses a range of technological, organizational, and support systems that enable effective remote work and seamless collaboration [39,41,42]. Here, we discuss some key infrastructures:
Digital Connectivity: High-speed and affordable internet is the cornerstone of remote work. In African cities, where digital infrastructure accessibility varies and can be limited, bridging the digital divide becomes crucial for inclusive blended work implementation. Studies have shown a direct link between improved internet access and increased remote work adoption, leading to reduced emissions [43]. To ensure an effective teleworking environment, the government in Africa needs to consider investing in widening the internet bandwidth more than other infrastructures; this has also been a noted effort being made in high-income countries like the United Kingdom [44].
Organizational Change: Shifting to a blended model requires a cultural shift within organizations. Building trust, fostering collaborative workflows, and equipping managers with tools to manage remote teams are key. Investing in training programs and communication platforms that break down geographical barriers will be essential for ensuring productivity and employee engagement.
Sustainable Support Systems: Blended work demands a rethinking of support systems. Ergonomic considerations for home workspaces, childcare options for working parents, and clear policies on work hours and communication etiquette are all crucial elements to address potential challenges like isolation and work–life balance.
Overall, the rationale for a blended working environment is rooted in the desire to create a flexible, adaptable, and inclusive workplace that meets the needs of both employees and the organization [45,46].

6. Challenges and Opportunities for Blended Work in Africa

While blended work offers numerous benefits, challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, digital divides, and organizational hesitancy should be addressed. Most African countries are operating with limited resources and some companies are struggling to maintain the costs of rental offices; a blended working environment can facilitate redirecting the cost invested in the increasing demand of rental offices on the continent to a model for the effective implementation of co-working spaces with organizations merging. This can be beneficial for governmental operations, empowering the government to operate at a low cost and offering an opportunity to increase green spaces on the continent [47,48].
It would be beneficial for African countries to invest in the establishment of network infrastructures to ensure the seamless accessibility, affordability, and stability of the internet. Further required investments would include the automation of the processes. Considering that only 30% of the population of SSA had access to the internet in 2022, there is a need for the government to collaborate with partners to increase this access, thus further boosting the adoption of blended working [49]. Training related to the use of the internet should be prioritized to boost such an economic shift. COVID-19 has already served as a trial for cultural adaptation, although some organizations are yet to be prepared [50].
Moreover, it is essential for the continent to strengthen digital data privacy protection policies and foster homegrown digital solutions. Hybrid models require connectivity, shifting from locally to overseas-hosted non-homegrown internet-connected software systems, jeopardizing individual non-encrypted data. Since privacy has become ever more crucial in the digital era, there are still insufficient data protection policies in many African countries. Enforcing digital data governance in Africa can foster a good digital working environment and enable safe data sharing while also optimizing individual data privacy [51].
To unlock the full potential of blended work for greener African cities, we propose that policymakers in the region prioritize several strategies. Firstly, investing in digital infrastructure is critical for enabling blended work in African cities. Governments should collaborate with private companies to extend high-speed broadband networks, particularly in rural and underserved areas, to ensure equitable access. Secondly, supporting hybrid work frameworks through legislation is essential. Governments should develop legal frameworks that support flexible working models, including regulations that protect remote workers’ rights, promote fair wages, and ensure health and safety standards for home workers. For example, policies that provide tax incentives for companies investing in remote work technologies could encourage the adoption of blended work at scale. Thirdly, promoting public–private partnerships is crucial for developing green infrastructure, such as sustainable public transport systems, that complements the benefits of remote work by reducing overall emissions. Fourthly, providing training and capacity building is essential to bridge the skills gap, particularly for workers in low-income communities. These programs will empower the workforce to take full advantage of blended work opportunities, ultimately driving economic resilience and reducing inequality. Fifthly, encouraging green mobility initiatives is vital to complement the environmental benefits of blended work. This could include funding for electric vehicle infrastructure, bike lanes, and improved public transportation systems. Finally, data privacy and cybersecurity legislation is crucial to protect the digital workforce and ensure that blended work models are secure. This could include national frameworks for data protection, with specific measures for remote work environments.

7. Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic, though a public health crisis, revealed new possibilities for addressing climate change through reduced mobility and remote work. While the implementation of blended work in African cities holds immense promise for reducing GHG emissions and promoting sustainable urban growth, the complexities of this transition should not be underestimated. The unique socio-economic and infrastructural challenges faced by African countries demand tailored approaches to digital connectivity, policy formulation, and organizational transformation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.G.I. and P.G.; methodology, A.I. and T.D.; formal analysis, P.G.I.; investigation, U.U., E.N., T.U. and R.H.; writing—original draft preparation, P.G.I., P.G., T.M., J.d.D.T. and E.M.; writing—review and editing, C.M.M., E.N., E.M. and T.D.; visualization, R.H., T.U. and E.M.; supervision, T.D.; project administration, P.G.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All data used are available online.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Viola, E.; Basso, L. Wandering decarbonization: The BRIC countries as conservative climate powers. Rev. Bras. Polít. Int. 2016, 59, e001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chapungu, L.; Nhamo, G.; Chikodzi, D.; Maoela, M.A. BRICS and the Race to Net-Zero Emissions by 2050: Is COVID-19 a Barrier or an Opportunity? J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Oladunni, O.J.; Mpofu, K.; Olanrewaju, O.A. Greenhouse gas emissions and its driving forces in the transport sector of South Africa. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 2052–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S.L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M.I., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  5. Oreskes, N. The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. Science 2004, 306, 1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, P.; Yang, X.-L.; Wang, X.-G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.-R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.-L.; et al. Discovery of a Novel Coronavirus Associated with the Recent Pneumonia Outbreak in Humans and Its Potential Bat Origin. 2020. Available online: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.22.914952v2 (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  7. Zhou, P.; Yang, X.-L.; Wang, X.-G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.-R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.-L.; et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, F.; Zhao, S.; Yu, B.; Chen, Y.-M.; Wang, W.; Song, Z.-G.; Hu, Y.; Tao, Z.-W.; Tian, J.-H.; Pei, Y.-Y.; et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 2020, 579, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hepburn, C.; O’Callaghan, B.; Stern, N.; Stiglitz, J.; Zenghelis, D. Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change? Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 2020, 36, S359–S381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Klenert, D.; Funke, F.; Mattauch, L.; O’Callaghan, B. Five Lessons from COVID-19 for Advancing Climate Change Mitigation. Environ. Resource Econ. 2020, 76, 751–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Addressing the sustainable urbanization challenge. UN Chron. 2012, 49, 58–60. [CrossRef]
  12. Trivellas, P.; Anastasopoulou, A.; Malindretos, G.; Reklitis, P.; Sakas, D.P. A place based analysis of stakeholders’ advancing sustainability in remote and isolated communities: The case of North Aegean Islands. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 899, 012044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Romero-Lankao, P.; Bulkeley, H.; Pelling, M.; Burch, S.; Gordon, D.J.; Gupta, J.; Johnson, C.; Kurian, P.; Lecavalier, E.; Simon, D.; et al. Urban transformative potential in a changing climate. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2018, 8, 754–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. CDP Africa Report—Benchmarking Progress Towards Climate Safe Cities, States, and Regions—The Elephant 2023. Available online: https://www.theelephant.info/documents/cdp-africa-report-benchmarking-progress-towards-climate-safe-cities-states-and-regions/ (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  15. Haider, N.; Osman, A.Y.; Gadzekpo, A.; Akipede, G.O.; Asogun, D.; Ansumana, R.; Lessells, R.J.; Khan, P.; Hamid, M.M.A.; Yeboah-Manu, D.; et al. Lockdown measures in response to COVID-19 in nine sub-Saharan African countries. BMJ Glob. Health 2020, 5, e003319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. deSouza, P.N.; Oriama, P.A.; Pedersen, P.P.; Horstmann, S.; Gordillo-Dagallier, L.; Christensen, C.N.; Franck, C.O.; Ayah, R.; Kahn, R.A.; Klopp, J.M.; et al. Spatial variation of fine particulate matter levels in Nairobi before and during the COVID-19 curfew: Implications for environmental justice. Environ. Res. Commun. 2021, 3, 071003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. The impact of urban mobility on air pollution in Kampala, an exemplar sub-Saharan African city. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2024, 15, 102057. [CrossRef]
  18. Galiwango, R.; Bainomugisha, E.; Kivunike, F.; Kateete, D.P.; Jjingo, D. Air pollution and mobility patterns in two Ugandan cities during COVID-19 mobility restrictions suggest the validity of air quality data as a measure for human mobility. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 34856–34871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mogaji, E. Impact of COVID-19 on transportation in Lagos, Nigeria. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2020, 6, 100154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Crippa, M.; Guizzardi, D.; Solazzo, E.; Muntean, M.; Schaaf, E.; Monforti-Ferrario, F.; Banja, M.; Olivier, J.; Grassi, G.; Rossi, S. GHG Emissions of All World Countries; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2021; Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fabio-Monforti/publication/355369128_GHG_emissions_of_all_world_countries_booklet_2021report/links/616d32a3951b3574c65e2d4b/GHG-emissions-of-all-world-countries-booklet-2021report.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  21. Open Knowledge Repository. Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/2a978bbc-bbd1-5ec9-baaa-33ba287681fd (accessed on 16 January 2025).
  22. Caros, N.S.; Guo, X.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, J. The impacts of remote work on travel: Insights from nearly three years of monthly surveys. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2303.06186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Du, J.; Rakha, H. Preliminary Investigation of COVID-19 Impact on Transportation System Delay, Energy Consumption and Emission Levels. Findings. 2020. Available online: https://findingspress.org/article/14103-preliminary-investigation-of-covid-19-impact-on-transportation-system-delay-energy-consumption-and-emission-levels (accessed on 16 January 2025).
  24. Hirota, K.; Kashima, S. How are automobile fuel quality standards guaranteed? Evidence from Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2020, 4, 100089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. GerMan, J. Estimated Cost of Emission Reduction Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles; The International Council on Clean Transportation: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; Available online: https://ledsgp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Estimated-cost-of-emission-reduction-technologies-for-light-duty-vehicles.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  26. Zhu, H.; McCaffery, C.; Yang, J.; Li, C.; Karavalakis, G.; Johnson, K.C.; Durbin, T.D. Characterizing emission rates of regulated and unregulated pollutants from two ultra-low NOx CNG heavy-duty vehicles. Fuel 2020, 277, 118192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. English-Vision_2050_Abridged_Version_WEB_Final.pdf. Available online: https://www.minecofin.gov.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/Minecofin/Publications/REPORTS/National_Development_Planning_and_Research/Vision_2050/English-Vision_2050_Abridged_version_WEB_Final.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  28. Gajendran, R.S.; Harrison, D.A. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J. Appl. Psychol. 2007, 92, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Magnavita, N.; Tripepi, G.; Chiorri, C. Telecommuting, Off-Time Work, and Intrusive Leadership in Workers’ Well-Being. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dingel, J.; Neiman, B. How Many Jobs Can Be Done at Home? CEPR Discussion Papers; Örebro University Business School: Örebro, Sweden, 2020; Available online: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/cprceprdp/14584.htm (accessed on 16 January 2025).
  31. Ipsen, C.; van Veldhoven, M.; Kirchner, K.; Hansen, J.P. Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from home in Europe during COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dhama, K.; Khan, S.; Tiwari, R.; Sircar, S.; Bhat, S.; Malik, Y.S.; Singh, K.P.; Chaicumpa, W.; Bonilla-Aldana, D.K.; Rodriguez-Morales, A.J. Coronavirus Disease 2019–COVID-19. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 33, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Boland, B.; De Smet, A.; Palter, R.; Sanghvi, A. Reimagining the Office and Work Life After COVID-19; McKinsey & Company: Brussels, Belgium, 2020; Volume 8, Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com.br/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/Organization/Our%20Insights/Reimagining%20the%20office%20and%20work%20life%20after%20COVID%2019/Reimagining-the-office-and-work-life-after-COVID-19-final.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2025).
  34. Bonacini, L.; Gallo, G.; Scicchitano, S. Working from home and income inequality: Risks of a ‘new normal’ with COVID-19. J. Popul. Econ. 2021, 34, 303–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pierce, M.; Hope, H.; Ford, T.; Hatch, S.; Hotopf, M.; John, A.; Kontopantelis, E.; Webb, R.; Wessely, S.; McManus, S. Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population. Lancet Psychiatry 2020, 7, 883–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Moretti, A.; Menna, F.; Aulicino, M.; Paoletta, M.; Liguori, S.; Iolascon, G. Characterization of home working population during COVID-19 emergency: A cross-sectional analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Irawanto, D.W.; Novianti, K.R.; Roz, K. Work from home: Measuring satisfaction between work–life balance and work stress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Economies 2021, 9, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, T.; Gerlowski, D.; Acs, Z. Working from home: Small business performance and the COVID-19 pandemic. Small Bus. Econ. 2022, 58, 611–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Barrett, P.; Treves, A.; Shmis, T.; Ambasz, D. The Impact of School Infrastructure on Learning: A Synthesis of the Evidence. 2019. Available online: https://books.google.ro/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Tf6jDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=23.%09Barrett+P,+Treves+A,+Shmis+T,+Ambasz+D.+The+impact+of+school+infrastructure+on+learning:+A+synthesis+of+the+evidence.+2019+%5Bcited+2023+Dec+13%5D%3B&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  40. Bouziri, H.; Smith, D.R.; Descatha, A.; Dab, W.; Jean, K. Working from home in the time of COVID-19: How to best preserve occupational health? Occup. Environ. Med. 2020, 77, 509–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Agenda, I. Shaping the future of construction a breakthrough in mindset and technology. In World Economic Forum; Boston Consulting Group: Boston, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 11–16. Available online: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Shaping_the_Future_of_Construction_report_020516.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  42. Gagné, M.; Parker, S.K.; Griffin, M.A.; Dunlop, P.D.; Knight, C.; Klonek, F.E.; Parent-Rocheleau, X. Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2022, 1, 378–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pokojski, Z.; Kister, A.; Lipowski, M. Remote work efficiency from the employers’ perspective—What’s next? Sustainability 2022, 14, 4220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Watts, J. Climate Crisis: In Coronavirus Lockdown, Nature Bounces Back–But for How Long. The Guardian. 2020. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/09/climate-crisis-amid-coronavirus-lockdown-nature-bounces-back-but-for-how-long (accessed on 1 October 2024).
  45. Davidescu, A.A.; Apostu, S.-A.; Paul, A.; Casuneanu, I. Work flexibility, job satisfaction, and job performance among Romanian employees—Implications for sustainable human resource management. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Grobelny, J. Factors Driving the Workplace Well-Being of Individuals from Co-Located, Hybrid, and Virtual Teams: The Role of Team Type as an Environmental Factor in the Job Demand–Resources Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Miller, N.G. Workplace trends in office space: Implications for future office demand. J. Corp. Real Estate 2014, 16, 159–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hsu, Y.-Y.; Han, H.; Lee, J. Co-working office spaces in Sydney: Spatiotemporal dynamics and industry patterns. Geogr. Res. 2024, 62, 358–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. DataBank. Statistical Performance Indicators (SPI). Available online: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/statistical-performance-indicators-(spi) (accessed on 25 October 2024).
  50. Biron, M.; Peretz, H.; Turgeman-Lupo, K. Trait Optimism and Work from Home Adjustment in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Considering the Mediating Role of Situational Optimism and the Moderating Role of Cultural Optimism. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Munung, N.S.; Staunton, C.; Mazibuko, O.; Wall, P.J.; Wonkam, A. Data protection legislation in Africa and pathways for enhancing compliance in big data health research. Health Res. Policy Syst. 2024, 22, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iradukunda, P.G.; Iradukunda, A.; Gashema, P.; Ngabo, E.; Tuyishime, J.d.D.; Musafiri, T.; Umuhoza, T.; Uwayo, U.; Moyo, E.; Habimana, R.; et al. From COVID-19 Pandemic Pivot to Progress: Blended Work as a Pathway to Greener African Cities. Challenges 2025, 16, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe16010010

AMA Style

Iradukunda PG, Iradukunda A, Gashema P, Ngabo E, Tuyishime JdD, Musafiri T, Umuhoza T, Uwayo U, Moyo E, Habimana R, et al. From COVID-19 Pandemic Pivot to Progress: Blended Work as a Pathway to Greener African Cities. Challenges. 2025; 16(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe16010010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iradukunda, Patrick Gad, Arnaud Iradukunda, Pierre Gashema, Emile Ngabo, Jean de Dieu Tuyishime, Tumusime Musafiri, Thérèse Umuhoza, Ulysse Uwayo, Enos Moyo, Richard Habimana, and et al. 2025. "From COVID-19 Pandemic Pivot to Progress: Blended Work as a Pathway to Greener African Cities" Challenges 16, no. 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe16010010

APA Style

Iradukunda, P. G., Iradukunda, A., Gashema, P., Ngabo, E., Tuyishime, J. d. D., Musafiri, T., Umuhoza, T., Uwayo, U., Moyo, E., Habimana, R., Muvunyi, C. M., & Dzinamarira, T. (2025). From COVID-19 Pandemic Pivot to Progress: Blended Work as a Pathway to Greener African Cities. Challenges, 16(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe16010010

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop