Testimonial Image Practices as a Politics of Aesthetics after Levinas
AbstractThe transition from ethics to politics still lacks a proper understanding. I propose thinking of this transition in terms of a politics of aesthetics. However, thinking about a politics of aesthetics means also thinking about images and their prohibition. The prohibition of images has a long history, dating back to the Bible and Plato; its implications are crucial for image theory. Since Levinas did not systematically develop a political theory, aesthetics, or image theory, it is necessary to collect and systematize his distributed statements. Having image theory as a starting point for a politics of aesthetics, I choose a media philosophical approach to identify the mediality of the image after Levinas. Key elements for a Levinasian image theory are the temporal aspect of its transient appearance, its involving affective power, and its negativity. I propose to think of this image theory as an image-pragmatics that testifies and responds not only to the Other but also to the mediality of the image. With Levinas it becomes possible to turn the prohibition of images into a commandment to remember. I call this a testimonial image practice that becomes a regulatory idea for a politics of aesthetics. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Bennke, J. Testimonial Image Practices as a Politics of Aesthetics after Levinas. Religions 2019, 10, 216.
Bennke J. Testimonial Image Practices as a Politics of Aesthetics after Levinas. Religions. 2019; 10(3):216.Chicago/Turabian Style
Bennke, Johannes. 2019. "Testimonial Image Practices as a Politics of Aesthetics after Levinas." Religions 10, no. 3: 216.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.