Next Article in Journal
Three-Dimensional Numerical Modeling of Local Scour Around Bridge Foundations Based on an Improved Wall Shear Stress Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Elemental Composition and Morphometry of Rhyssoplax olivacea (Polyplacophora): Part II—Intraspecific Variation
Previous Article in Journal
Adaptive Tracking Method for Time-Varying Underwater Acoustic Channel Based on Dynamic Gaussian Window
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reproductive Biology of the Invasive Blue Crab Callinectes sapidus in the Thermaikos Gulf (Northwest Aegean Sea, Eastern Mediterranean): Identifying Key Information for an Effective Population Management Policy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Elemental Composition and Morphometry of Rhyssoplax olivacea (Polyplacophora): Part I—Radula and Valves

by
Thomas Mygdalias
1,
Anastasios Varkoulis
1,*,
Konstantinos Voulgaris
1,
Stefanos Zaoutsos
2 and
Dimitris Vafidis
1
1
Department of Ichthyology and Aquatic Environment, University of Thessaly, Nea Ionia, 38445 Volos, Greece
2
Department of Energy Systems, University of Thessaly, 41334 Larisa, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12(12), 2186; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122186
Submission received: 5 November 2024 / Revised: 17 November 2024 / Accepted: 27 November 2024 / Published: 29 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Biota Distribution and Biodiversity)

Abstract

:
Rhyssoplax olivacea is the most common Mediterranean polyplacophoran species; however, no information exists regarding the functionality of its skeleton. The present study describes allometric trends related to its valves and radula and examines their chemical composition using specimens from the Aegean Sea, eastern Mediterranean Sea. Differences in valve width and thickness were found among all three valves; in particular, the intermediate valve had a significantly shorter length compared to the two terminal ones. The intermediate valve exhibited different trends for valve length to valve width and valve length to valve thickness compared to the terminal valves. However, all valve morphometrics to body length appeared to adhere to a shared trend. The radula to body length exhibited positive allometry. Regarding the elemental composition, all three valves appeared to have similar elemental compositions; however, the element concentrations in the radula differed with the tooth type. Iron was always the dominant element, with the highest values reported for the major lateral tooth (83% wt%). This study provides valuable insights into the different aspects of the skeleton of R. olivacea, enabling future research to focus on the skeletal functionality from evolutionary and ecological perspectives.

1. Introduction

Chitons are marine mollusks, belonging to the class Polyplacophora, which have existed since the Carboniferous period with little change in their morphology [1]. They can be locally abundant, found in midlittoral and shallow sublittoral hard substrata boulder fields around the world, and they exert top-down control on their habitats, making them important grazers [1,2,3,4]. Rhyssoplax olivacea is primarily a Mediterranean species, and is considered the most common chiton in the Aegean and Marmara Sea [5,6]. Its presence has been recorded from the eastern Mediterranean to southern Portugal [7]. It commonly inhabits boulders, though it has also been observed living on calcareous algae, sponges and anthozoans, at depths ranging from 0.5 to 62 m [6]. Recently, its population dynamics have been described in terms of population size and growth; however, not much is known about the evolution of its ecological parameters [8].
Different chiton species utilize different trophic sources correlated with radula morphology [9]. The chiton radula is composed of rows of teeth containing large concentrations of magnetite and apatite, which are considered some of the stiffest and hardest biological materials, allowing for continuous scraping of food from hard substrates [10,11]. Its four tooth types (central, lateral I, lateral II, marginal) exhibit different elemental compositions even at intraspecific level [12].
The chiton’s shell is composed of eight skeletal valves, which is an autapomorphy amongst mollusks [7]. These structures provide protection from wave action and predation, while their morphological features are affected by environmental conditions [13]. Apart from their primary role in protection, they also influence locomotion, enabling the animal to curve into a ball when dislodged from the surface it is attached to [13,14]. The valves are made of aragonite, and both their morphology and microstructure are considered to be taxonomic characteristics [15].
The present study is the first to describe the allometry and elemental composition of the valves and radula of R. olivacea in the Mediterranean Sea using pooled data from a geographic range along the Aegean Sea. Since polyplacophorans are relatively understudied in the Mediterranean, this will provide new insights regarding the ecological functionality of the skeletal elements of one of the most widely distributed chiton species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Study Sites

Overall, 98 individuals of R. olivacea were collected during summer 2023 and 2024 by scuba diving, at depths between 0.5 and 2 m, and transported to the laboratory in a cooler filled with ice for further processing. The minimum body length of the collected individuals was established at 14 mm to mitigate variations in mineralogy or allometry due to differences in ontogenic stages. The study included five distinct regions within the Aegean Sea (Table 1).
Paxos Island is located in the Ionian Sea, a transition area characterized by several small-scale oceanographic phenomena and great biodiversity, due to its special hydrodynamic and topographic features [16]. Evoia Island is situated in the central Aegean and presents relatively high tides, while anthropogenic pressure is also noticeable [17]. Pagasitikos Gulf is a shallow, semi-enclosed system located in the northwestern part of the Aegean Sea, with an average depth of 69 m and is significantly affected by anthropogenic activities [18]. Chalkidiki Peninsula is located in the north Aegean and is dominated by the presence of the low-salinity Black Sea Water (BSW) that enters into the Aegean through the Straits of Dardanelles, shaping the oceanographic characteristics of this region [19]. Limnos Island is also situated in the north Aegean and is mainly influenced by the complex interactions between the BSW and Aegean waters, which distinguish it from Chalkidiki [20].

2.2. Morphometric Measurements

To avoid measurement errors occurring due to body contraction, a relaxation protocol was used prior to the morphometric measurements, which involved gradually switching from seawater to fresh water (up to a 1:1 ratio) [21]. For each specimen, the total length (TL) was measured using a digital vernier caliper to the nearest 0.01 mm. The radula and valves (head I, intermediate IV and tail VIII) were carefully dissected and removed from the specimens. They were then rinsed with distilled water to remove any remaining tissue. The morphometric measurements consisted of the valve length, width, thickness and radular total length (RL). All measurements were taken using a digital vernier caliper (±0.01 mm), except for valve thickness, which was measured via scanning electron microscopy (Figure 1).

2.3. Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS)

For the elemental composition of the radula and valves, forty samples of intact radulae and valves I, IV and VIII were taken, each from the same individuals. They were first rinsed with distilled water and subsequently critical point-dried. The processed samples were subsequently mounted on metal stabs with carbon-based tape and spatter coated with 6 nm carbon by a Q150R Plus-rotary pumped coater carbon thread evaporator and were then displayed using SEM JEOL JSM 6510 (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). For the radula, the working zone was selected and radular teeth were categorized into four tooth types (central tooth, lateral I tooth, lateral II and marginal tooth) based on their morphology and position according to the relevant literature [12]. An EDS analysis was performed using a JEOL JSM 6510 scanning electron microscope outfitted with an Oxford Ling ISIS 300 system to examine the chemical composition of the valves and radulae teeth (Figure 1). Three measurements were taken from the upper surface of each tooth and the cross-section of each valve, lasting 240 s in a 0.102 mm area.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

To compare morphometric measurements across valve types, as well as elemental concentrations across valve and radular tooth types, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed, combined with Tukey’s post-hoc test with Bonferroni adjusted-p correction, accounting for multiple comparisons. Prior to the analyses, homogeneity and normality were tested using Levene’s and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, respectively. For the allometric relationships, the function SMA from the “smatr” package was used [22]. Variables were log transformed to linearize the allometric equation (y = axb) [23] and each one was then subjected each to Standard Major Axis (SMA) regression [24]. SMA is a Type II regression, which minimizes the distance between the regression line and data points along both axes, accounting for error in both variables. To determine whether the slope was equal to 1 (isometry), one-sample two-tailed t-tests were conducted for each set of variables.

3. Results

3.1. Morphometric Analysis

All relationships were significant (p < 0.05), with highest coefficient of determination (R2) observed for the valve length–valve width of the head valve, whereas the lowest R2 was reported for the valve length–valve thickness of the tail valve (Table 2). The relationship between radular length and total length exhibits positive allometry, while the mean ratio of radula to total length was 0.42 ± 0.08 with minimum and maximum values of 0.23 and 0.58, respectively (Table 2, Figure 2). Regarding the valve length to valve width allometry, valves I and VIII showed isometry, whereas positive allometry was observed for valve IV (Table 2, Figure 3A). All valves exhibited negative allometry for the valve width–valve thickness relationship, while for valve length–valve thickness both terminal plates showed negative allometry, and isometry was observed for the intermediate valve (Table 2, Figure 3B,C).
Allometric relationships between valves and the whole animal showed a uniform trend for all valves, with body length–valve length exhibiting isometry and body length–valve thickness presenting negative allometry for the three valves (Table 2, Figure 3D,F,G,I,J,L). The only exception was body length–valve width, for which valves IV and VIII showed isometry, whereas valve I exhibited positive allometry (Table 2, Figure 3E,H,K).
Comparing the standardized morphometrics among valves, the two terminal valves showed no statistical differences regarding length, exhibiting higher values compared to the intermediate valve (p < 0.001, F = 28.43, df = 270, MSE = 0.00052; Figure 4A). All three valves exhibited significantly different values for width and thickness (p < 0.001, F= 289.9, df = 270, MSE = 0.0017; p < 0.001, F= 21.14, df = 270, MSE = 0.000028, respectively), with the intermediate valve showing the highest values for both variables, while the tail valve presented lowest width and the head valve lowest thickness (Figure 4B,C).

3.2. Elemental Composition

Statistical differences were observed only for the elemental composition among tooth types, but not among valves (Table 3).
Fe exhibited the highest wt% for all tooth types, followed by Ca, while the lowest values were observed for Si (Figure 5). All four tooth types appeared to have significantly different Fe content, with the major lateral tooth and marginal tooth exhibiting the highest and lowest values, respectively (Table 3, Figure 5). The Ca content did not differ among tooth types except for the lateral II, which exhibited significantly lower values compared to the other three types. The Mg concentration showed an inverse trend to that of Fe, with all tooth types having statistically different Mg content. The lowest values were observed for the major lateral tooth, whereas the highest values were observed for the marginal tooth. No statistical variations were reported between central and lateral I and lateral II and marginal tooth, with the former two presenting lower values. The lowest K values were observed for the major lateral tooth, followed by central and lateral I, which did not show any statistical variation, while the marginal tooth exhibited the highest values. Si followed the same trend as Ca, with the lateral II tooth showing significantly lower values compared to the other three tooth types (Figure 5).
Ca exhibited the highest values among the reported elements: 93.03 ± 15.12% for the head, 93.64 ± 11.97% for the intermediate and 94.28 ± 11.33% for the tail valve. The average valve Fe was reported to be 1.76 ± 7.49%, 1.33 ± 4.17% and 3.34 ± 4.17% for valves I, IV and VIII, respectively. The Mg, P, K and Si concentrations for the head valve were at 0.64 ± 2.07%, 0.69 ± 2.76%, 0.58 ± 1.64% and 0.47± 2.83%, respectively; for the intermediate valve, they were 0.39 ± 0.88%, 0.22 ± 0.56%, 0.58 ± 0.98% and 0.35 ± 1.32%, respectively; and for the tail valve, they were 0.47 ± 1.11%, 0.23 ± 0.53%, 0.47 ± 0.61% and 0.5 ± 1.8%, respectively.

4. Discussion

It was previously suggested that the relative length of the radula is indicative of its trophic position at species level [9]. The relative length of chiton radula varies with feeding preferences, while the average values reported here indicate that R. olivacea might not be herbivores, contrary to what was previously suggested [9,25]. Radula allometry changes with the life stage for many marine mollusks, with juvenile individuals exhibiting higher relative radular length compared to adults (e.g., [26]). In our study, positive allometry was observed, suggesting that the radula of adult individuals of R. olivacea continues growing at a fast rate. This might be related to this species’ short life cycle and high growth rate [8]; however, since this is the first study to examine the allometry of chiton radula, it is unclear whether this trend is characteristic of R. olivacea or whether it also occurs in other chitons.
Differences in valve allometry have been observed inter- and intra-specifically, while valve widths can differ among valves of the same animal [14,27,28]. Valve allometry was hypothesized to be linked to habitat preferences [29], while allometric differences among valves can be a result of different growth mechanisms [30]. Acanthopleura echinata, Chiton granosus, Enoplochiton niger and Tonicia elegans exhibited isometry regarding the valve length–total length relationship, which was in accordance with our findings for R. olivacea [30]. Since all five species belong to the family Chitonidae, this trend might be related to a shared evolutionary feature rather than to the effect of habitat, as they are found in different biogeographic zones. The allometric trends regarding the valve morphometrics of R. olivacea differ between terminal and intermediate valves, as was previously shown for other species [30,31]. These differences might be necessary for the functionality of the shell as a whole, providing maximal protection during the “passive” (stretched) and “defensive” (curled) phases (see [14] for details).
The comparison of chemical composition among chiton species across various families and genera reveals significant variability (Table 4). Most research on radula mineralogy has primarily focused on the lateral II tooth (Table 4). High concentrations of iron have been reported in the major lateral tooth (lateral II) across various polyplacophoran species, including Acanthopleura hirtosa, Lepidochitona cinerea, Cryptochiton stelleri, and Plaxiphora albida (Table 4). However, comparing the specific percentages measured is difficult due to differing methodological approaches [32,33,34]. This study identified similar concentrations of Ca, Mg, P, K, and Si to those found in the polyplacophoran species in the major lateral tooth.
Regarding the central, lateral I, and marginal tooth types, the detection of high percentages of inorganic components contradicts the results of previous studies, which suggest that these tooth types are non-mineralized [12].
R. olivacea presents the highest values for Fe% within Chitonidae and the second highest among all species following Cryptoplax striata regarding the major lateral tooth. These species are also differentiated in terms of their overall elemental composition, with C. striata exhibiting no Ca content and a much higher Mg concentration (Table 4). High concentrations of iron and possibly Mg have been shown to confer superior mechanical properties (i.e., Young’s modulus and hardness) probably related to feeding preferences [42]. This suggests that C. striata might differ from R. olivacea regarding their dietary preferences, and this suggestion is further enhanced by substantial differences in relative radular length (0.24 and 0.42, respectively) [9].

5. Conclusions

The allometry and relative size of the radula of R. olivacea appear to be related to this species’ ecology, i.e., its feeding habits and resource utilization. Regarding the valve characteristics, there seems to be little variation among valves, with the intermediate valve showing some differentiation in relative size and allometric trends. All valves appear to exhibit similar elemental composition, whereas different tooth types present distinct elemental profiles. This is potentially related to different functional roles in food acquisition, while the high concentration of iron in the major lateral tooth might have a direct influence on feeding preferences. Given this species’ extended spatial distribution, geographic and bathymetric intraspecific differences related to environmental parameters might exist. Since this is the first study to focus on the allometry and elemental composition of R. olivacea, no intraspecific comparisons were possible; thus, future research should focus on other regions to elucidate how abiotic factors might influence the examined parameters.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization A.V., K.V. and D.V.; methodology A.V., K.V., T.M. and S.Z.; formal analysis A.V., K.V., T.M. and D.V.; project administration D.V.; supervision D.V.; visualization A.V., K.V. and D.V.; writing—original draft A.V., T.M. and K.V.; writing—review and editing A.V., K.V., T.M. and D.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

No ethical issues related with the use of animals in the laboratory procedures were involved.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sigwart, J.D. Morphological Cladistic Analysis as a Model for Character Evaluation in Primitive Living Chitons (Polyplacophora, Lepidopleurina). Am. Malacol. Bull. 2009, 27, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kaas, P.; Belle, R.A.V.; Strack, H.L. Monograph of Living Chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora), Volume 6 Family Schizochitonidae; BRILL: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2006; ISBN 978-90-474-1837-5. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dethier, M.N.; Duggins, D.O. An “Indirect Commensalism” between Marine Herbivores and the Importance of Competitive Hierarchies. Am. Nat. 1984, 124, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Elahi, R.; Sebens, K.P. Experimental Removal and Recovery of Subtidal Grazers Highlights the Importance of Functional Redundancy and Temporal Context. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Strack, H.L. The Distribution of Chitons (Polyplacophora) in Greece. Apex 1988, 3, 67–80. [Google Scholar]
  6. Koukouras, A.; Karachle, P. The Polyplacophoran (Eumollusca, Mollusca) Fauna of the Aegean Sea with the Description of a New Species, and Comparison with Those of the Neighbouring Seas. J. Biol. Res. 2004, 3, 23–38. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dell’Angelo, B.; Smriglio, C. Living Chitons of the Mediterranean; Evolver: Reston, VA, USA, 2001; ISBN 978-88-8299-007-7. [Google Scholar]
  8. Varkoulis, A.; Voulgaris, K.; Zachos, D.S.; Vafidis, D. Population Dynamics of Three Polyplacophora Species from the Aegean Sea (Eastern Mediterranean). Diversity 2023, 15, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sigwart, J.D.; Schwabe, E. Anatomy of the Many Feeding Types in Polyplacophoran Molluscs. Invertebr. Zool. 2017, 14, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lowenstam, H.A. Lepidocrocite, an Apatite Mineral, and Magnetite in Teeth of Chitons (Polyplacophora). Science 1967, 156, 1373–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, T.; Huang, W.; Pham, C.H.; Murata, S.; Herrera, S.; Kirchhofer, N.D.; Arkook, B.; Stekovic, D.; Itkis, M.E.; Goldman, N.; et al. Mesocrystalline Ordering and Phase Transformation of Iron Oxide Biominerals in the Ultrahard Teeth of Cryptochiton stelleri. Small Struct. 2022, 3, 2100202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Krings, W.; Brütt, J.-O.; Gorb, S.N. Ontogeny of the Elemental Composition and the Biomechanics of Radular Teeth in the Chiton Lepidochitona cinerea. Front. Zool. 2022, 19, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sigwart, J.D.; Green, P.A.; Crofts, S.B. Functional Morphology in Chitons (Mollusca, Polyplacophora): Influences of Environment and Ocean Acidification. Mar. Biol. 2015, 162, 2257–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Connors, M.J.; Ehrlich, H.; Hog, M.; Godeffroy, C.; Araya, S.; Kallai, I.; Gazit, D.; Boyce, M.; Ortiz, C. Three-Dimensional Structure of the Shell Plate Assembly of the Chiton Tonicella marmorea and Its Biomechanical Consequences. J. Struct. Biol. 2012, 177, 314–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Peebles, B.A.; Smith, A.M.; Spencer, H.G. Valve Microstructure and Phylomineralogy of New Zealand Chitons. J. Struct. Biol. 2017, 197, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Coll, M.; Piroddi, C.; Steenbeek, J.; Kaschner, K.; Lasram, F.B.R.; Aguzzi, J.; Ballesteros, E.; Bianchi, C.N.; Corbera, J.; Dailianis, T.; et al. The Biodiversity of the Mediterranean Sea: Estimates, Patterns, and Threats. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Poulos, S.; Lesioti, S.; Karditsa, A.; Angelopoulos, C. Factors Controlling the Formation and Evolution of a Beach Zone in Front of a Coastal Cliff: The Case of the East Coast of Evia Island in the Aegean Sea, Eastern Mediterranean. Water 2024, 16, 1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Petihakis, G.; Triantafyllou, G.; Pollani, A.; Koliou, A.; Theodorou, A. Field Data Analysis and Application of a Complex Water Column Biogeochemical Model in Different Areas of a Semi-Enclosed Basin: Towards the Development of an Ecosystem Management Tool. Mar. Environ. Res. 2005, 59, 493–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zodiatis, G. Advection of the Black Sea Water in the North Aegean Sea. Glob. Atmos. Ocean. Syst. 1994, 2, 41–60. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zervakis, V.; Georgopoulos, D. Hydrology and Circulation in the North Aegean (Eastern Mediterranean) throughout 1997 and 1998. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2002, 3, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Avila-Poveda, O.H.; Abadia-Chanona, Q.Y. Emergence, Development, and Maturity of the Gonad of Two Species of Chitons “Sea Cockroach” (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) through the Early Life Stages. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Warton, D.I.; Duursma, R.A.; Falster, D.S.; Taskinen, S. Smatr 3– an R Package for Estimation and Inference about Allometric Lines. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2012, 3, 257–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Samuel, B. Bioenergetic and Growth; Reinhold: New York, NY, USA, 1945. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sokal, R.R.; Rohlf, F.J. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd ed.; W.H. Freeman and Co.: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pitacco, V.; Orlando-Bonaca, M.; Mavrič, B.; Lipej, L. Macrofauna Associated with a Bank of Cladocora caespitosa (Anthozoa, Scleractinia) in the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic). Ann. Ser. Hist. Nat. 2014, 24, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yee, A.K.; Padilla, D.K. Allometric Scaling of the Radula in the Atlantic Slippersnail Crepidula fornicata. J. Shellfish. Res. 2015, 34, 903–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Baxter, J.M. Allometric and Morphological Variations of Whole Animal and Valve Dimensions in the Chiton Lepidochitona cinereus (L.) (Mollusca: Polyplacophora). J. Molluscan Stud. 1982, 48, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. BAXTER, J.M.; JONES, A.M. Allometric and Morphological Characteristics of Tonicella marmorea (Fabricius, 1780) Populations (Mollusca: Polyplacophora: Ischnochitonidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1986, 88, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Salloum, P.M.; Lavery, S.D.; de Villemereuil, P.; Santure, A.W. Local Adaptation in Shell Shape Traits of a Brooding Chiton with Strong Population Genomic Differentiation. Evolution 2023, 77, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ibáñez, C.M.; Sepúlveda, R.D.; Sigwart, J.D. Comparative Allometric Variation in Intertidal Chitons (Polyplacophora: Chitonidae). Zoomorphology 2018, 137, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Saad, A.E.A. Morphometric Studies on the Rock Chiton Acanthopleura spiniger (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) from the Northwestern Region of the Red Sea. Indian J. Mar. Sci. 1997, 26, 49–52. [Google Scholar]
  32. Krings, W.; Brütt, J.-O.; Gorb, S.N. Elemental Analyses Reveal Distinct Mineralization Patterns in Radular Teeth of Various Molluscan Taxa. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 7499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Weaver, J.C.; Wang, Q.; Miserez, A.; Tantuccio, A.; Stromberg, R.; Bozhilov, K.N.; Maxwell, P.; Nay, R.; Heier, S.T.; DiMasi, E.; et al. Analysis of an Ultra Hard Magnetic Biomineral in Chiton Radular Teeth. Mater. Today 2010, 13, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shaw, J.A.; Macey, D.J.; Brooker, L.R. Radula Synthesis by Three Species of Iron Mineralizing Molluscs: Production Rate and Elemental Demand. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 2008, 88, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Towe, K.M.; Lowenstam, H.A. Ultrastructure and Development of Iron Mineralization in the Radular Teeth of Cryptochiton stelleri (Mollusca). J. Ultrastruct. Res. 1967, 17, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lee, A.P.; Brooker, L.R.; Macey, D.J.; van Bronswijk, W.; Webb, J. Apatite Mineralization in Teeth of the Chiton Acanthopleura echinata. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2000, 67, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Brooker, L.; Lee, A.; Macey, D.; van Bronswijk, W.; Webb, J. Multiple-Front Iron-Mineralisation in Chiton Teeth (Acanthopleura echinata: Mollusca: Polyplacophora). Mar. Biol. 2003, 142, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brooker, L.R.; Macey, D.J. Biomineralization in Chiton Teeth and Its Usefulness as a Taxonomic Character in the Genus Acanthopleura Guilding, 1829 (MoUusca: Polyplacophora). Am. Malacol. Bull. 2001, 16, 203–215. [Google Scholar]
  39. Brooker, L.R.; Lee, A.P.; Macey, D.J.; Webb, J.; van Bronswijk, W. In Situ Studies of Biomineral Deposition in the Radula Teeth of Chitons of the Suborder Chitonina. Venus 2006, 65, 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim, K.-S.; Webb, J.; Macey, D.J.; Cohen, D.D. Compositional Changes during Biomineralization of the Radula of the Chiton Clavarizona hirtosa. J. Inorg. Biochem. 1986, 28, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Macey, D.; Brooker, L. The Junction Zone: Initial Site of Mineralization in Radula Teeth of the Chiton Cryptoplax striata (Mollusca: Polyplacophora). J. Morphol. 1996, 230, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Krings, W.; Matsumura, Y.; Brütt, J.-O.; Gorb, S.N. Material Gradients in Gastropod Radulae and Their Biomechanical Significance: A Combined Approach on the Paludomid Lavigeria Grandis. Die Naturwissenschaften 2022, 109, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) An in situ photograph of R. olivacea on a boulder. (B) A macroscopic photograph showing head (left), intermediate and tail (right) valves indicating measurements for valve lengths and widths. (C) A scanning electron micrograph of a cross-section of an intermediate valve indicating the valve thickness. (D) A macroscopic photograph of a radula indicating the radular length. (E) A scanning electron micrograph of a radula. Different colors indicate different tooth types: red—major lateral (II) tooth, yellow—central tooth, green—lateral I tooth, blue—marginal tooth.
Figure 1. (A) An in situ photograph of R. olivacea on a boulder. (B) A macroscopic photograph showing head (left), intermediate and tail (right) valves indicating measurements for valve lengths and widths. (C) A scanning electron micrograph of a cross-section of an intermediate valve indicating the valve thickness. (D) A macroscopic photograph of a radula indicating the radular length. (E) A scanning electron micrograph of a radula. Different colors indicate different tooth types: red—major lateral (II) tooth, yellow—central tooth, green—lateral I tooth, blue—marginal tooth.
Jmse 12 02186 g001
Figure 2. Relationship between radula length—body length. Grey areas indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 2. Relationship between radula length—body length. Grey areas indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Jmse 12 02186 g002
Figure 3. Allometric relationships between valve dimensions (AC) and valve dimensions to body length (DL). Colored (AC) and grey (DL) areas indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3. Allometric relationships between valve dimensions (AC) and valve dimensions to body length (DL). Colored (AC) and grey (DL) areas indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Jmse 12 02186 g003
Figure 4. Comparisons of valve dimensions ((A) Valve length, (B) Valve width, (C) Valve thickness) among the three examined valve types. a–c indicate statistical differences as reported by the post-hoc test.
Figure 4. Comparisons of valve dimensions ((A) Valve length, (B) Valve width, (C) Valve thickness) among the three examined valve types. a–c indicate statistical differences as reported by the post-hoc test.
Jmse 12 02186 g004
Figure 5. Comparisons of element concentrations among tooth types. a–d indicate statistical differences among tooth types for each element, as reported by post-hoc tests.
Figure 5. Comparisons of element concentrations among tooth types. a–d indicate statistical differences among tooth types for each element, as reported by post-hoc tests.
Jmse 12 02186 g005
Table 1. Sampled Areas, number of specimen, mean depth and mean body length.
Table 1. Sampled Areas, number of specimen, mean depth and mean body length.
AreaCoordinatesNDepth (m)Mean Length (mm)
Chalkidiki Peninsula 40°23′2.73″ N, 23°55′21.19″ E312–2.514.4
Limnos Island39°51′28.6″ N, 25°03′47.0″ E90.5–115.01
Pagasitikos Gulf 39°20′50.09″ N, 22°58′22.84″ E340.5–116.69
Evoia Island38°37′31.35″ N, 24°7′16.09″ E150.5–120.03
Paxos Island 39°11′51.47″ N, 20°11′10.74″ E90.517.41
Table 2. Allometric relationships for valves and radula.
Table 2. Allometric relationships for valves and radula.
RelationshipSkeletal ElementEquationR2Allometry
Length–WidthIlog(L) = 1.082log(W) − 0.3650.65Isometry
IVlog(L) = 1.309log(W) − 0.7230.46Positive
VIIIlog(L) = 1.062log(W) − 0.2860.61Isometry
Width–ThicknessIlog(W) = 0.699log(T) + 1.0110.38Negative
IVlog(W) = 0.66log(T) + 1.0460.39Negative
VIIIlog(W) = 0.705log(T) + 0.9210.21Negative
Length–ThicknessIlog(L) = 0.756log(T) + 0.7290.33Negative
IVlog(L) = 0.864log(T) + 0.6460.41Isometry
VIIIlog(L) = 0.748log(T) + 0.6920.16Negative
Total Length–Valve LengthIlog(TL) = 1.094log(IL) + 0.6460.41Isometry
IVlog(TL) = 0.874log(IVL) + 0.8190.27Isometry
VIIIlog(TL) = 1.009log(VIIIL) + 0.7090.49Isometry
Total Length–Valve WidthIlog(TL) = 1.183log(IW) + 0.0.2570.55Positive
IVlog(TL) = 1.145log(IVW) + 0.1860.49Isometry
VIIIlog(TL) = 1.072log(VIIIW) + 0.4210.47Isometry
Total Length–Valve ThicknessIlog(TL) = 0.827log(IT) + 1.4530.27Negative
IVlog(TL) = 0.756log(IVT) + 1.3840.41Negative
VIIIlog(TL) = 0.755log(VIIIT) + 1.410.27Negative
Radula Length–Total LengthRadulalog(RL) = 2log(TL) − 1.60.5Positive
Table 3. One-way ANOVA results for the elemental composition among tooth and valve types.
Table 3. One-way ANOVA results for the elemental composition among tooth and valve types.
RadulaValves
FpFp
Ca33.51<0.0010.2660.766
Fe137<0.0010.5320.588
Mg35.94<0.0010.8860.413
K61.34<0.0010.3440.709
P15.16<0.0013.0580.482
Si10.7<0.0010.1690.844
Table 4. Summarized data regarding the elemental composition of different polyplacophoran species.
Table 4. Summarized data regarding the elemental composition of different polyplacophoran species.
FamilySpeciesRegionMethodToothChemical Elements (%)Reference
AcanthochitonidaeAcanthochitona fascicularisNorth SeaEDXC(A) Ca (<1%), Mg (<1%), P (1%),[32]
Acanthochitona fascicularisNorth SeaEDXL1A Fe (<1%), Ca (1%), Mg (2%),P (2%), K (1%)[32]
Acanthochitona fascicularisNorth SeaEDXL2(A) Fe (29%), Ca (6%), Mg (4%), P (9%), K (1%)[32]
Acanthochitona fascicularisNorth SeaEDXM (A) Ca (6%), Mg (<1%)[32]
Cryptochiton stelleri EMPAL2Fe (51.8%), Ca (3.8%), P (13.3%)[35]
Cryptochiton stelleriPacific OceanRaman; EDSL2(W) Fe (69%)[33]
ChitonidaeAcanthopleura hirtosaIndian OceanICP-AESWhole(μg/g) Fe (59%),Ca (19%), Mg (3%), P (13%), K (<1%), Si (<1%)[34]
Acanthopleura echinataPacific OceanRaman; EDSL2(A) Fe (<3%), Ca (32%), P (16%)[36]
Acanthopleura echinataPacific OceanEDSL2(A) Fe (66%), Ca (<1%), P (<1%) [37]
Acanthopleura echinataPacific OceanRaman; EDSL2(A) Fe (1.3%), Ca (27.3%), Mg (0.4%), P (14.2%)[37]
Acanthopleura milesIndian OceanRaman; EDSL2(A) Fe (7.1%), Ca (28.4%), Mg (0.6%), P (13.6%)[37]
Acanthopleura spinosaPacific OceanEDSL2(A) Fe (~62%), Ca (<1%), Mg (<1%), P (<1%)[38]
Chiton mamoratusAtlanticRaman; EDSL2(A) Fe (0.8%), Ca (33.2%), Mg (0.5%), P (16.7%)[39]
Clavarizona hirtosaIndian OceanPIXE and PIGME L2Fe, Ca, K, P [40]
Onithochiton quercinusIndian OceanEDSL2(A) Fe (66%), Ca (<1%), Mg (<1%), P (<1%)[38]
Onithochiton quercinusIndian OceanRaman; EDSL2(A) Fe (0.2%), Ca (31.3%), Mg (0.4%), P (15.3%)[39]
Rhyssoplax olivaceaMediterranean EDSC(W) Fe (54%), Ca (15%), Mg (3%), P (4%), K (4%), Si (<1%) Present study
Rhyssoplax olivaceaMediterranean EDSL1(W) Fe (47%), Ca (15%), Mg (4%), P (6%), K (4%), Si (<1%) Present study
Rhyssoplax olivaceaMediterranean EDSL2(W) Fe (83%), Ca (7%), Mg (2%), P (4%), K (<1%), Si (<1%) Present study
Rhyssoplax olivaceaMediterranean EDSM(W) Fe (36%), Ca (17%), Mg (5%), P (7%), K (5%), Si (<1%) Present study
Sypharochtion pelliserpentisPacific OceanRaman; EDSL2(A) Fe (4.2%), Ca (30.5%), Mg (0.6%), P (16.3%)[39]
CryptoplacidaeCryptoplax striataIndian OceanEDSL2(A) Fe (~92%), Mg (5.5%), K (1%), Si (1%)[41]
IschnochitonidaeIschnochiton australisIndian OceanEDSL2(A) Fe (~62%), Ca (<1%), Mg (<1%), P (<1%)[38]
Ischnochiton australisIndian OceanRaman; EDSL2(A) Fe (2.7%), Ca (16.2%), Mg (6.0%), P (13.6%)[39]
MopaliidaePlaxiphora albidaIndian OceanICP-AESWhole(μg/g) Fe (87%), Ca (2%), Mg (1%), P (5%), K (<1%), Si (<1%)[34]
Plaxiphora albidaIndian OceanEDSL2(A) Fe (~66%), Ca (<1%), Mg (<1%), P (<1%)[38]
Plaxiphora albidaIndian OceanRaman; EDSL2(A) Fe (26.7%), Ca (6.5%), Mg (2.4%), P (11.2%)[39]
TonicellidaeLepidochitona cinereaNorth SeaEDXC (A) Fe (2%), Ca (4%), K (<1%)[32]
Lepidochitona cinereaNorth SeaEDXL1(A) Ca (4%), Si (<1%)[32]
Lepidochitona cinereaNorth SeaEDXL2(A) Fe (32%), Ca (8%), Mg (3%), P (7%), K (1%)[32]
Lepidochitona cinereaNorth SeaEDXM (A) Fe (1%), Ca (5%), K (<1%), Si (<1%)[32]
(A) Atomic%; (W) weight%.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mygdalias, T.; Varkoulis, A.; Voulgaris, K.; Zaoutsos, S.; Vafidis, D. Elemental Composition and Morphometry of Rhyssoplax olivacea (Polyplacophora): Part I—Radula and Valves. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122186

AMA Style

Mygdalias T, Varkoulis A, Voulgaris K, Zaoutsos S, Vafidis D. Elemental Composition and Morphometry of Rhyssoplax olivacea (Polyplacophora): Part I—Radula and Valves. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2024; 12(12):2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122186

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mygdalias, Thomas, Anastasios Varkoulis, Konstantinos Voulgaris, Stefanos Zaoutsos, and Dimitris Vafidis. 2024. "Elemental Composition and Morphometry of Rhyssoplax olivacea (Polyplacophora): Part I—Radula and Valves" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 12, no. 12: 2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122186

APA Style

Mygdalias, T., Varkoulis, A., Voulgaris, K., Zaoutsos, S., & Vafidis, D. (2024). Elemental Composition and Morphometry of Rhyssoplax olivacea (Polyplacophora): Part I—Radula and Valves. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(12), 2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122186

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop