This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Interpreting Yield–Spectral Relationships in Wheat and Cotton Using a Unified Sentinel-2 Indicator Framework
by
Emmanouil Psomiadis
Emmanouil Psomiadis *
,
Antonia Oikonomou
Antonia Oikonomou
,
Marilou Avramidou
Marilou Avramidou
and
Antonis Kavvadias
Antonis Kavvadias
Laboratory of Mineralogy and Geology, Department of Natural Resources and Agricultural Engineering, School of Environment and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos Str., Votanikos, 11855 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2026, 16(11), 1252; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111252 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 3 April 2026
/
Revised: 18 May 2026
/
Accepted: 3 June 2026
/
Published: 5 June 2026
Abstract
Accurate estimation of crop yield from remote sensing remains challenging due to the crop-specific nature of yield drivers and the difficulty of interpreting spectral indicators across agronomic systems. While many studies prioritise predictive accuracy through complex models, fewer explicitly examine the stability and physiological relevance of individual spectral and phenological indicators under controlled analytical conditions. This study investigates yield–spectral relationships in wheat and cotton using a unified Sentinel-2 indicator framework applied across multiple growing seasons in a Mediterranean agricultural environment. A consistent set of spectral and thermal indicators was derived from two phenologically targeted Sentinel-2 acquisitions per season and analysed using correlation analysis, univariate regression, constrained multivariate modelling, and recurrence analysis within an identical workflow for both crops. Distinct crop-specific patterns were observed. Wheat yield was most strongly associated with water-sensitive and canopy-related indicators, with NDWI-based metrics reaching Pearson correlations up to r = 0.85 and multivariate models explaining a substantial proportion of yield variability (up to R2 ≈ 0.70) under controlled analytical conditions. In contrast, cotton yield variability was dominated by thermal accumulation, with growing degree day indicators showing correlations up to |r| = 0.59 and multivariate performance reaching R2 = 0.74. Recurrence analysis indicated consistent recurrence of these indicator families across analytical stages under the examined conditions. Overall, the results indicate that parsimonious, physiologically interpretable indicator combinations can account for a meaningful proportion of yield variability without reliance on highly complex or high-dimensional modelling approaches, supporting crop-aware indicator selection for precision agriculture applications.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Psomiadis, E.; Oikonomou, A.; Avramidou, M.; Kavvadias, A.
Interpreting Yield–Spectral Relationships in Wheat and Cotton Using a Unified Sentinel-2 Indicator Framework. Agriculture 2026, 16, 1252.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111252
AMA Style
Psomiadis E, Oikonomou A, Avramidou M, Kavvadias A.
Interpreting Yield–Spectral Relationships in Wheat and Cotton Using a Unified Sentinel-2 Indicator Framework. Agriculture. 2026; 16(11):1252.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111252
Chicago/Turabian Style
Psomiadis, Emmanouil, Antonia Oikonomou, Marilou Avramidou, and Antonis Kavvadias.
2026. "Interpreting Yield–Spectral Relationships in Wheat and Cotton Using a Unified Sentinel-2 Indicator Framework" Agriculture 16, no. 11: 1252.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111252
APA Style
Psomiadis, E., Oikonomou, A., Avramidou, M., & Kavvadias, A.
(2026). Interpreting Yield–Spectral Relationships in Wheat and Cotton Using a Unified Sentinel-2 Indicator Framework. Agriculture, 16(11), 1252.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111252
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.