Analysis of Pig Tendencies to Stay Specific Sections Within the Pig Barn According to Environmental Parameters and Facilities Features
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Summary of Environmental Parameters Inside the Experimental Pig Barn and Growth of Pigs
3.1.1. Environmental Parameters Overview
3.1.2. Correlation Analysis of Environmental Parameters in the Experimental Pig Barn
3.1.3. Analysis of Body Weight and Average Daily Gain(ADG) During the Experimental Period
3.2. Summary of Environmental Parameters by Section
3.3. Number of Pigs Staying in Each Section According to Facility and Structural Features
3.4. Environmental Parameters and Pig Presence by Section
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- OECD. Meat Consumption. OECD Data. 2023. Available online: https://data.oecd.org/agroutput/meat-consumption.htm (accessed on 9 September 2023).
- FAOSTAT. Crops and Livestock Products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2023. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed on 9 September 2023).
- Guatteo, R.; Guémené, D. Sources of known and/or potential pain in farm animals. Adv. Anim. Biosci. 2014, 5, 319–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ison, S.H.; Clutton, R.E.; Di Giminiani, P.; Rutherford, K.M.D. A review of pain assessment in pigs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2016, 3, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Herskin, M.S.; Bundgaard, C.J.; Ottesen, J.L.; Sørensen, D.B.; Marchant-Forde, J.N. The pig. In Animal-Centric Care and Management; CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 173–186. [Google Scholar]
- Meiqing, W.; Larsen, M.L.; Liu, D.; Winters, J.F.; Rault, J.L.; Norton, T. Towards re-identification for long-term tracking of group housed pigs. Biosyst. Eng. 2022, 222, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murphy, E.; Nordquist, R.E.; van der Staay, F.J. A review of behavioural methods to study emotion and mood in pigs (Sus scrofa). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2014, 159, 9–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, E.S.; Harding, E.J.; Mendl, M. Measuring emotional processes in animals: The utility of a cognitive approach. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2005, 29, 469–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, E.S.; Mendl, M.T. Animal emotion: Descriptive and prescriptive definitions and their implications for a comparative perspective. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018, 205, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawkins, M.S. Behavioural deprivation: A central problem in animal welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1988, 20, 209–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dockès, A.C.; Kling-Eveillard, F. Farmers’ and advisers’ representations of animals and animal welfare. Livest. Sci. 2006, 103, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benard, M.; de Cock Buning, T. Exploring the potential of Dutch pig farmers and urban-citizens to learn through frame reflection. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2013, 26, 1015–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vandresen, B.; Hötzel, M.J. Pets as family and pigs in crates: Public attitudes towards farrowing crates. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021, 236, 105254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vandresen, B.; Hötzel, M.J. Mothers should have freedom of movement—Citizens’ attitudes regarding farrowing housing systems for sows and their piglets. Animals 2021, 11, 3439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sato, P.; Hötzel, M.J.; von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. American citizens’ views of an ideal pig farm. Animals 2017, 7, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ryan, E.B.; Fraser, D.; Weary, D.M. Public attitudes to housing systems for pregnant pigs. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yunes, M.; von Keyserlingk, M.A.G.; Hötzel, M.J. Restricting the ability of sows to move: A source of concern for some Brazilians. Anim. Welf. 2018, 27, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spoolder, H.A.M.; Aarnink, A.A.J.; Vermeer, H.M.; van Riel, J.; Edwards, S.A. Effect of increasing temperature on space requirements of group housed finishing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012, 138, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brambell, F.W.R. Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals Kept Under Intensive Livestock Husbandry Systems; Her Majesty’s Stationery Office: London, UK, 1965. [Google Scholar]
- Carpenter, C.B.; Holder, C.J.; Wu, F.; Woodworth, J.C.; DeRouchey, J.M.; Tokach, M.D.; Goodband, R.D.; Dritz, S.S. Effects of increasing space allowance by removing a pig or gate adjustment on finishing pig growth performance. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 2659–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laskoski, F.; Faccin, J.E.; Vier, C.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Orlando, U.A.; Kummer, R.; Mellagi, A.P.M.; Bernardi, M.L.; Wentz, I.; Bortolozzo, F.P. Effects of pigs per feeder hole and group size on feed intake onset, growth performance, and ear and tail lesions in nursery pigs with consistent space allowance. J. Swine Health Prod. 2019, 27, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boon, C.R. The effect of air speed changes on the group postural behaviour of pigs. J. Appl. Agric. Eng. Res. 1982, 27, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruce, J.M.; Clark, J.J. Models of heat production and critical temperature for growing pigs. Anim. Prod. 1979, 28, 353–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Averós, X.; Brossard, L.; Dourmad, J.Y.; de Greef, K.H.; Edge, H.L.; Edwards, S.A.; Meunier-Salaün, M. Quantitative assessment of the effects of space allowance, group size and floor characteristics on the lying behaviour of growing-finishing pigs. Animal 2010, 4, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quinou, N.; Noblet, J.; van Milgen, J.; Dubois, S. Modelling heat production and energy balance in group-housed growing pigs exposed to low or high ambient temperatures. Br. J. Nutr. 2001, 85, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hayne, S.M.; Tennessen, T.; Anderson, D.M. The responses of growing pigs exposed to cold with varying amounts of straw bedding. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 80, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horback, K. Nosing around: Play in pigs. Anim. Behav. Cogn. 2023, 1, 186–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chantziaras, I.; De Meyer, D.; Vrielinck, L.; Van Limbergen, T.; Piniero, C.; Dewulf, J.; Kyriazakis, I.; Maes, D. Environment-, health-, performance- and welfare-related parameters in pig barns with natural and mechanical ventilation. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 183, 105150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curtis, S.E. Environmental Management in Animal Agriculture; Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Nannoni, E.; Aarnik, A.J.A.; Vermeer, H.M.; Reimert, I.; Fels, M.; Bracke, M.B.M. Soiling of pig pens: A review of eliminative behaviour. Animals 2020, 10, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Randall, J.M.; Armsby, A.W.; Sharp, J.R. Cooling gradients across pens in a finishing piggery: II. Effects on excretory behaviour. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1983, 28, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraser, D. Science, values and animal welfare: Exploring the “inextricable connection”. Anim. Welf. 1995, 4, 103–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, E.M.; Nolan, A.M.; Fitzpatrick, J.L. Conceptual and methodological issues related to welfare assessment: A framework for measurement. Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci. 2001, 30, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnett, J.L. A review of the welfare issues for sows and piglets in relation to housing. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2001, 52, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Broom, D.M. Indicators of poor welfare. Br. Vet. J. 1986, 142, 524–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraser, A.F.; Broom, D.M. Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare; Baillière Tindall: London, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Broom, D.M. Welfare, stress and the evolution of feelings. Adv. Study Behav. 1998, 27, 371–403. [Google Scholar]
- Matthews, S.G.; Miller, A.L.; Clapp, J.; Plötz, T.; Kyriazakis, I. Early detection of health and welfare compromises through automated detection of behavioural changes in pigs. Vet. J. 2016, 217, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dawkins, M. Using behaviour to assess animal welfare. Anim. Welf. 2004, 13, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Broom, D.M.; Johnson, K.G. Stress and Animal Welfare. In Key Issues in the Biology of Humans and Other Animals, 2nd ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 19. [Google Scholar]
- Moon, H.S.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.T.; Park, K.T.; Kim, Y.K. A fundamental study for development of unglazed transpired collector control system in windowless pig house. J. Agric. Eng. 2016, 62, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Regulations on Land Area Standards for Livestock Farming; Official Gazette of the Republic of Korea: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2010.
- Kim, Y.H. Specifications for Improving Pork Quality and Productivity; National Institute of Animal Science: Wanju, Republic of Korea, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Basak, J.K.; Paudel, B.; Shahriar, S.A.; Deb, N.C.; Kang, D.Y.; Kim, H.T. Prediction of drinking water requirements by applying statistical and machine learning models in the growing-finishing stage of pigs. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2023, 210, 107934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Damm, B.I.; Pedersen, L.J. Eliminative behaviour in preparturient gilts previously kept in pens or stalls. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010, 124, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olsen, A.W.; Dybkjær, L.; Simonsen, H.B. Behaviour of growing pigs kept in pens with outdoor runs: II. Temperature regulatory behaviour, comfort behaviour, and dunging preferences. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2001, 71, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, H.; Tao, X.; Lin, J.; Li, Y.; Xin, H. Comparative evaluation of cooling systems for farrowing sows. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2001, 17, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Q.; Ni, J.-Q.; Bao, J.; Su, Z. Correlations, variations, and modelling of the indoor environment in a mechanically ventilated pig building. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 282, 124441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Philippe, F.-X.; Nicks, B. Review on greenhouse gas emissions from pig houses: Production of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide by animals and manure. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 199, 10–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zong, C.; Zhang, G.; Feng, Y.; Ni, J.-Q. Carbon dioxide production from a fattening pig building with a partial pit ventilation system. Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 126, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michigan State University Extension. Basic Types of Ventilation in Swine Barns. Available online: https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/basic-types-of-ventilation-in-swine-barns#:~:text=The%20main%20goal%20of%20mechanically,1%2C000%20cubic%20feet%20per%20minute (accessed on 3 April 2025).
- Han-Don. Body Weight and Average Daily Gain During the Piglet Stage. Han-Don Data. November 2015. Available online: http://data.han-don.com/f_index.php/menu1/view6/notice_no/857/page/11 (accessed on 3 April 2025).
- Pork Information Gateway. Timing the Purchase of Your Project Pig. June 2014. Available online: https://porkgateway.org/resource/timing-the-purchae-of-your-project-pig (accessed on 3 April 2025).
- Cao, M.; Zong, C.; Zhuang, Y.; Teng, G.; Zhou, S.; Yang, T. Modeling of Heat Stress in Sows Part 2: Comparison of Various Thermal Comfort Indices. Animals 2021, 11, 1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vermeer, H.M.; Aarnink, A.J.A. Review on Heat Stress in Pigs on Farm (Version 1.0). Zenodo 2023, 1, 7620726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geers, R.; Goedseels, V.; Parduyns, G.; Nijns, P.; Wouters, P. Influence of floor type and surface temperature on the thermoregulatory behaviour of growing pigs. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1990, 45, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasdal, G.; Møgedal, I.; Bøe, K.E.; Kirkden, R.; Andersen, I.L. Piglet preference for infrared temperature and flooring. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010, 122, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Components | Composition |
---|---|
Fat (crude) | >4.5 |
Ash (crude) | <8 |
Protein (crude) | <18 |
Fiber (crude) | <10.0 |
Calcium | >0.5 |
Lysine | >0.9 |
Crude protein (digestible) | >12.0 |
Phosphorus | <1.2 |
Phosphorus | <1.2 |
Energy (digestible) | 3500 |
Section | Facilities Features | |
---|---|---|
Facilities | Wall | |
A | None | TWS |
B | VFS | OWS |
C | None | TWS |
D | FS | OWS |
E | None | NWS |
F | DS | OWS |
G | FS | OWS |
H | None | NWS |
I | DS | OWS |
J | None | TWS |
K | None | OSW |
L | None | TWS |
Parameters | Correlation Coefficient (r) | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Counts pigs | IRH | −0.02 | < 0.05 |
IT | −0.39 | < 0.001 | |
ICO2 | −0.24 | < 0.001 | |
THI | −0.38 | < 0.001 | |
HI | −0.18 | < 0.001 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kang, D.Y.; Moon, B.E.; Kang, M.Y.; Kook, J.H.; Deb, N.C.; Tamrakar, N.; Arulmozhi, E.; Kim, H.T. Analysis of Pig Tendencies to Stay Specific Sections Within the Pig Barn According to Environmental Parameters and Facilities Features. Agriculture 2025, 15, 1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15121282
Kang DY, Moon BE, Kang MY, Kook JH, Deb NC, Tamrakar N, Arulmozhi E, Kim HT. Analysis of Pig Tendencies to Stay Specific Sections Within the Pig Barn According to Environmental Parameters and Facilities Features. Agriculture. 2025; 15(12):1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15121282
Chicago/Turabian StyleKang, Dae Yeong, Byeong Eun Moon, Myeong Yong Kang, Jung Hoo Kook, Nibas Chandra Deb, Niraj Tamrakar, Elanchezhian Arulmozhi, and Hyeon Tae Kim. 2025. "Analysis of Pig Tendencies to Stay Specific Sections Within the Pig Barn According to Environmental Parameters and Facilities Features" Agriculture 15, no. 12: 1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15121282
APA StyleKang, D. Y., Moon, B. E., Kang, M. Y., Kook, J. H., Deb, N. C., Tamrakar, N., Arulmozhi, E., & Kim, H. T. (2025). Analysis of Pig Tendencies to Stay Specific Sections Within the Pig Barn According to Environmental Parameters and Facilities Features. Agriculture, 15(12), 1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15121282