Next Article in Journal
The Effects of the Combined Application of Biochar and Phosphogypsum on the Physicochemical Properties of Cd-Contaminated Soil and the Yield Quality of Chinese Cabbage
Previous Article in Journal
Extraction of Canal Distribution Information Based on UAV Remote Sensing System and Object-Oriented Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Essential Oils, Chemical Compounds, and Their Effects on the Gut Microorganisms and Broiler Chicken Production: Review

by
Jaime Salinas-Chavira
and
Hugo Brígido Barrios-García
*
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Victoria 87000, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2024, 14(11), 1864; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111864
Submission received: 29 August 2024 / Revised: 17 October 2024 / Accepted: 21 October 2024 / Published: 23 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Gut Microbiota in Farm Animal Health)

Abstract

:
The influence of essential oils (EOs) on gut microorganisms and broiler chicken production was evaluated through the systematic analysis of scientific reports. The present study was focused on the EO antimicrobial activity oriented toward broiler chicken production. There is a great biodiversity of plants, and various compounds with different biological activity have been isolated from them. The EO molecules extracted from plants have been employed recently in livestock feeding. Microbial resistance to antibiotics has led to their reduced use in animal production. To maintain competitive broiler chicken production with reduced antibiotic use, EOs have been explored. In broiler chickens, EOs are supplemented in the diet or drinking water to enhance weight gain and feed efficiency and reduce mortality. EOs are an alternative to antibiotics, and their research is dynamic in poultry production. The present review focused on the antimicrobial activity oriented to broiler chicken production. The search for information in databases used the terms “broiler chicken”, “essential oils” and combined them with the name of the plants. It was detected that the EO of Cinnamon bark or its compound cinnamaldehyde could reduce pathogenic bacteria in the digestive tract and improve intestinal morphology. Essential oils from Cymbopogon spp. and Origanum vulgare had an effect mainly against Gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella spp., and others, and against some Gram-positive bacteria, such as Staphylococcus spp., or yeasts, such as Candida albicans. Essential oils of Cymbopogon citratus acted against Salmonella. Citrus japonica affected Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella typhimurium. Origanum EO improved the antioxidant status and gut health of chickens, while EO of Eucalyptus with carvacrol, thymol, and Citrus lemon improved the productive performance of broiler chickens; also, Citrus spp. reduced the number of oocysts of Eimeria and showed activity against Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. It is concluded that EOs are a sustainable alternative to antibiotics in the production of broiler chickens. Future research includes the standardization of EO from different plants and active molecules, as well as the interaction with other feed additives and their impact on the health and production of broiler chickens. In addition, safety for consumers and the environment must be considered.

1. Introduction

Antibiotics have frequently been used to promote growth in poultry production; however, in recent years, the scientific community has evidenced the alarming increase in antibiotic resistance, which has led to failure in infectious disease treatments [1,2]; for this reason, antibiotics have been restricted as supplements in animal production [3]. Because of this bacterial drug resistance that occurs more frequently, the need to intensify the search for alternatives of non-antibiotic growth promoters for poultry has arisen, which could improve the microbiota of birds, avoiding the adverse effects produced using antimicrobials.
As an option for antimicrobials as growth promoters, natural products obtained from plants that have been shown to have marked antimicrobial activity have been proposed [4]. Since ancient times, plants have been used for a wide variety of purposes, from treating diseases to preserving foods [5], and have influenced the microbiota of animals and humans [6,7]. Essential oils are liquid extracts of aromatic plants and have been given various uses in both industry and medicine. In industry, essential oils are employed in cosmetics [8]. In foods, they have been widely used to extend their shelf life [9]. In medicine, they have been used as antimicrobial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, digestive, carminative, antipyretic, antitussive, antiseptic, healing, and anticancer agents [10,11,12], and antioxidants [8,13]. EOs contain secondary plant molecules as active ingredients and include different extracts such as essential oils and pure compounds that are isolated from them [4]. The EO molecules improve the physiology and metabolism of broiler chickens in various forms; they enhance the digestion of nutrients, decrease gut microorganisms with potential pathogenic, reduce oxidative stress, control free radicals from metabolism, and fortify the immune system and other variables that enhance the nutritional parameters [14,15,16] and the productive performance of broiler chickens [11,13]. The objective of this review was to evaluate the influence of essential oil molecules on health and applications in broiler chicken production through systematic analysis of scientific reports.

2. Methodology

A detailed systematic review was conducted over a 6-month period (from February 2024 to August 2024). The databases of Google Scholar, Web Science, PUBMED, and Scielo were used. The terms “broiler chicken”, “essential oils”, combined with the names of plants, like “Lemongrass”, “Citrus”, “Origanum”, “Rosmarinus”, “Phoebe”, “Curcuma”, “Thyme”, “Eucalyptus”, “Allium”, “Monarda”, “Lavandula”, “Cinnamond”, etc., were used. All research that combined words and provided information relevant to this topic was included, regardless of the year of publication or language. Articles that were not relevant to the topic were excluded. A total of 158 publications were included in the current manuscript, and about 71% were published in the last 10 years (2014 to 2024). The journals included in the Journal Citation Report (JCR) were mainly considered; however, some others that provided important data for the purpose of the review were also considered.

3. Essential Oils: Main Compounds and Applications

Paracelsus, in the sixteenth century, was the first to coin the term “essential oil” when he identified the activity of these compounds [17]. The components of essential oils form a total of around 500 compounds [18,19]. Because there is a great biodiversity of plants throughout the world derived from the different climatological conditions in regional areas, there is a wide biological and structural variety of their compounds [20,21,22]. Various molecules have been reported in leaves, flowers, roots, and other parts of the plants. The main molecules are phenolic compounds (phenols, phenylpropanoids, stilbenes, and their glucosides), isoprenoids (terpenes, carotenoids, storage lipids), alkaloids, and special amino acids (alliin, canavanine) (Table 1) [23]. This generates a diversity of natural oils that favors the development of new antibacterial, antifungal, antiparasitic, and insecticide compounds [8,13], as well as being used in human and animal feeding [24].
Among this variability of compounds of essential oils obtained from plants, we can mention Carvacol, which is extracted from Origanum vulgare, Lippia sp., Coridothymus sp., and Thymus spp. [25]. Citrus lemon produces phenols and flavonoids [26,34]. EO from Curcuma spp. and Eucalyptus oleosa produce Monoterpene and Sesquiterpene [29,31]. Rosemary officinalis has Monoterpene [27]; another example is Linalool found in EOs from Ocimum basilicum [5] and Lavandula angustifolia [35], all of them with antibacterial effects.
Several essential oils have also been used as antioxidants; in eukaryotic cells, EO can act as pro-oxidants that affect internal cell membranes and organelles such as mitochondria; and depending on the type and concentration of the oil, they show cytotoxic effects in living cells, changes in the intracellular redox potential, and mitochondrial dysfunction and may, therefore, be associated with their capability to exert antigenotoxic effects [8,36,37].
Another use of essential oils is in industry; the biological activity of the EO of different species of Juniperus (Juniperus communis L., J. oxycedrus L., J. pygmaea C. Koch., and J. sibirica Burgsd) has been evaluated and observed that the EO tested had significant repellent and insecticidal activity against the two aphid species Rhopalosiphum padi (bird cherry–oat aphid) and Sitobion avenae (English grain aphid) and moderate activity against selected pathogens such as Fusarium spp., Botrytis cinerea, Colletotrichum spp., Rhizoctonia solani, and Cylindrocarpon pauciseptatum [38].
Currently, EOs have been used to improve food preservation, inhibit bacteriological growth to allow for longer food preservation, and inhibit the proliferation of pathogens that can upset the health of consumers, whether human or animal [24]. Microencapsulation of EOs in the food industry has been evaluated, and it has been observed that this positively affects the action of the active compounds in the essential oils, improving their antioxidant activity [39].
A combination of various EOs has been evaluated as a dietary supplement as an alternative with synergistic effects; this promotes a beneficial and healthy option for the food industry by improving food safety for consumers [24]. Evaluations of emulsions prepared with colloidal oil-in-water from essential oils have also been carried out to assess antimicrobial activity [40].
Some EOs are being used to improve nutritional parameters, such as feed conversion [14,15,16]. In broiler chicken production, natural products obtained from plants that have shown marked antimicrobial activity, and an improving effect on the intestinal mucosa have been proposed [4]. There are several studies that evaluated the effect of essential oils alone [40] or in combination with other feed additives and had synergistic effects [24], such as the antibacterial effect, to increase weight gain and improve feed conversion [16,41,42].

4. Modes of Action of Essential Oil Molecules

The action mode for essential oils to improve the health and productive performance of broiler chickens is shown in Figure 1. Essential oils improve nutrient absorption mainly due to the improvements in gut condition. Essential oils reduce the growth of pathogenic microorganisms and the toxins they produce; essential oils also prevent the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that affect enterocyte function. The better balance for intestinal microorganisms and the reduction in toxins and oxidative agents (ROS) are beneficial effects of EO on the enterocyte condition. Essential oils also increase the absorption area in enterocytes, mainly villi and crypts. Additionally, EO increases the production of digestive enzymes. All these effects improve the nutrient absorption in chickens. On the other hand, EO also reduces oxidative stress and improves the immune system of chickens. In total, the improvements in productive performance with EO are due to improvements in digestion (gut) and health of broiler chickens (Figure 1).
Essential oils and their components have been studied for their antimicrobial activities (antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral). Several studies show findings indicating only whether EOs have an effect on microorganisms, either by inducing bacterial lysis or inhibiting replication; however, the mechanisms of action of molecules have been little studied. Different forms of antimicrobial action have been proposed, such as cell membrane malfunction, inhibiting DNA/RNA synthesis or expression, or interfering with quorum sensing by interrupting cellular communication [43,44]; it has also been documented that some phytocompounds inhibited the production of bacterial toxins [43]. Carvacrol, one of the most frequently found compounds in phytopharmaceuticals, modifies the permeability of the bacterial membrane to cations such as H+ and K+, generating an imbalance in the essential processes of the cell, leading to the death of the bacteria [45,46,47]. Thymol, like carvacrol, contains a phenolic group and a delocalized electron system; consequently, carvacrol, thymol, cymene, menthol, and methylcarvacrol have shown that the hydroxyl group and the presence of a delocalized electron system are important elements for antibacterial activity [48]. Phytopharmaceuticals can also act on the membrane, inducing the release of autolytic enzymes associated with the cell membrane, which can induce lysis, as in the case of essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia in Staphylococcus aureus [49,50]. Some others, such as berberine, gallic acid, and capsaicin, can inhibit bacterial efflux pumps [51]. In addition to their antibacterial properties, essential oils and their active components modulate the activity of some essential molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways in eukaryotic cells; for example, a-pinene inhibits respiratory activity in yeast mitochondria, and b-pinene has similar effects on intact yeast cells or isolated mitochondria [48,52]. On the other hand, the EO of clove, thyme, Cinnamon, and eugenol inhibit the production of toxins in some pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes, reducing its pathogenicity [43].

5. Types of Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity

Essential oils from different species of plants contain volatile and non-volatile compounds [10]. Different EOs have been reported; among the most common are those of Cymbopogon citratus, Origanum spp., Citrus spp., Rosmarinus spp., Origanum spp., Eucalyptus spp., and others (Table 2).
In a study where C. citratus essential oil was evaluated, LGEO had antimicrobial activity [53]. The action of C. citratus essential oil against multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Heidelberg (S. Heidelberg) was also published [54]. S. Heidelberg included in foodborne illnesses and poultry products promote the spread of this bacteria; this study showed that all tested concentrations of LGEO significantly reduced complete inhibition of motility, biofilm formation, and the presence of S. Heidelberg in skin samples. Considering this, Dewi proposed that LGEO be used for its antibacterial effect in the scalding process to reduce S. Heidelberg in broiler chickens [54].
Mandarin peels are used for the production of essential oils; some of them, such as Citrus reticulata, C. reticulata, C. japonic, and C. sinensis, are often used to produce EO. Lin (1995) evaluated the antibacterial and antioxidant activity of four types of extracted EO and determined that monoterpene hydrocarbons are the main components, and limonene was the predominant compound for all citrus essential oils. C. japonica EO had the best inhibitory effect on B. subtilis, E. coli, and S. typhimurium with MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) values of 1.56, 1.56, and 6.25 μL/mL, respectively. Citrus EOs showed antioxidant activity; thymol was only found in C. reticulata EO, and the proportion of γ-terpinene (8.19%) was the highest; this might be the reason C. reticulata EO had the best antioxidant activity [55].
Another citrus fruit studied, Citrus sinensis, extracted EO from Citrus sinensis by steam distillation and extraction with hexane. The major component was d-limonene (73.9–97%); however, lower percentages of linalool, geraniol, and nerol were also found. Geraci (2017) reported that Citrus sinensis had antimicrobial activity against Listeria monocytogenes, while the hexane extract inhibited the development of Staphylococcus aureus, L. monocytogens, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [56].
Origanum, Thymus, Coridothymus, Thymbra, Satureja, and Lippia are rich in carvacrol, an isomer of monoterpene phenol with thymol [34]. Carvacrol is a monoterpenoid phenol [60] and is responsible for the biological activities of oregano. Diverse activities of carvacrol have been demonstrated, such as antimicrobial, antitumor, antimutagenic, antigenotoxic, analgesic, antispasmodic, anti-inflammatory, angiogenic, antiparasitic, antiplatelet, anti-elastase, insecticide, antihepatotoxic, and hepatoprotective, and also as a feed additive [5,34,53,61].
The antimicrobial activity of Origanum spp. oils was reported by several authors [5,62], evidencing activity on bacterial strains such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella indiana, Listeria innocua, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis [42,46], in addition to antioxidant activity [36]. On the other hand, Origanum vulgare ssp. Hirtum, another variety, showed antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, inhibiting the development of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella typhimurium, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 [36].
Rosmarinus officinalis, another plant from which essential oil is extracted, according to what was published by Mathlouthi (2012), reported activity against three pathogenic bacteria, Escherichia coli, Salmonella indiana, and Listeria innocua [42,57]. It was also observed that combining Rosmarinus spp. and Origanum spp. EOs in broiler chickens showed in vitro antimicrobial activities and effects on growth performance [42]. Bozin (2007) found that the distilled oil of R. officinalis was composed of approximately equal amounts of oxygenated monoterpenes (46.9%) and monoterpene hydrocarbons (46.7%) and observed high sensibility for Gram-negative bacteria such as Eschericia coli, even multidrug-resistant, and for Shigella sonei, Salmonella typhi, Salmonella enteritidis, and some Gram-positive bacteria, such as Microccoccus flavus, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Bacillus subtilis. Rosmarinus officinalis EO has antifungal activity in Candida albicans, Epidermophyton floccosum, Microsporum canis, and Trichophyton spp. [27]. These data were consistent with what was published by Stojiljkovic (2018), demonstrating the antibacterial effect of Rosmarinus extract [57].
EO obtained from leaves of Phoebe bournei (Hemsl.) mainly included α-copaene, α-muurolene, δ-cadinene, and 1s-calamenene; these compounds had inhibitory activities against fungi, such as Epidermophyton floccosum and Microsporum gypseum [63]. In another study, moderate growth inhibition was reported for bacteria, such as Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus, and filamentous fungi, such as Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus fumigatus, by the essential oils of Beilschmiedia madang Blume (Lauraceae), in addition to their antioxidant activities [37].
Negi (1999) published antibacterial activity of EOs from Curcuma spp. against Bacillus cereus, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [58]. Furthermore, Avanço (2017) reported the action of Curcuma as an antifungal and anti-mycotoxigenic on Fusarium verticillioides [64], and Singh (2010) reported their antioxidant activities [65]. Traditionally, Curcuma is used for the treatment of gastrointestinal, inflammatory, wound, pain, cancer prevention, and anti-aging conditions, among others [31].
Sakkas and Papadopoulou (2017) studied the antimicrobial activity of EO from Thyme [5]. Hammer (1999) published that Thyme EO inhibits the growth of C. albicans and E. coli [53]. Thyme and Oleum menthae piperitae essential oils have been suggested to reduce bacterial contamination of houses in broiler chicken production; the effect was to decrease the bacterial count of Enterobacteriaceae and Sthaphylococcus spp. Thyme oil favored the decrease in coliform bacteria, while O. menthae piperitae oil had a greater inhibitory effect on Staphylococcus proliferation [66].
Essential oils of Eucalyptus are commonly used for treating disorders of the respiratory system such as pharyngitis, bronchitis, and sinusitis [67]; however, emulsions from eucalypt EO have shown antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli, Sthaphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomona aeruginosa [40]. Moreover, Eucalyptus EO has also shown antifungal action against yeast-like fungi, as well as an antioxidant action [68]. In another research with broiler chickens, the mixture of eucalypt EO with carvacrol, thymol, and lemon added in drinking water considerably decreased S. Heidelberg colonization in birds’ crops, and it was proposed that this pathogen could be reduced in birds treated with these essential oils [69].
Essential oils from Allium sativum have been evaluated based on their potential antibacterial and antioxidant activity on intestinal bacteria of broiler chickens [70]. Encapsulated A. sativum EO was used in this study, which evidenced a significant increase in beneficial effects on in vitro (antibacterial and antioxidant properties) and on in vivo (performance and gut health) conditions of the broiler chickens. Therefore, this supplementation in the feed was considered as an alternative to antibiotics as growth promoters in poultry production [70].
The EO Monarda didyma showed antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activity. It was suggested that adding essential oils of M. didyma to the diet of broiler chickens offered an alternative substitute to the antibiotic growth promoters [71].
The essential oils of Lavandula angustifolia have antioxidant, antifungal, antibacterial, sedative, antidepressant, anti-inflammatory, hypnotic, analgesic, and anticancer activity [35,72]. In this plant, 26 compounds were identified, of which linalool acetate (46.25%) and linalool (35.17%) were the main components. Essential oils of L. angustifolia had an activity on ATCC bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella pullorum, Candida albicans, Escherichia coli, Salmolella enteritidis, Psudomona aeruginosa, and Salmonella typhimurium [59]. Additionally, the essential oils of L. angustifolia also increase the antioxidant status in the blood serum of broiler chickens [73].
There are other less-studied essential oils, such as those extracted from the genera Eugenia and Syzygium. These are important for their economic potential due to their pharmacological properties. Their main volatile compounds are sesquiterpene hydrocarbons and oxygenated sesquiterpenes, mainly with skeletons of caryophyllan and germacraine, and mostly pinane-type monoterpenes. The essential oils show some biological activities, especially antimicrobial, anticholinesterase, anticancer, antiprotozoal, antioxidant, acaricide, antinociceptive, and anti-inflammatory [22].
Mohammadhosseini (2017) published that the EO from the rhizome of Hedychium coccineum had significant nematicide activity against Meloidogyne incognita, insecticidal activity against Spodoptera litura, moderate herbicidal activity against R. raphanistrum sub sp. sativus, and good antifungal activity against Fusarium oxysporum and Curvularia lunata. They also had activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi [74].
Typical products in food have also been studied as in the case of the EO of Muscadinia rotundifolia, where twenty-three volatile compounds were reported. The EO of the flowers showed very weak antioxidant power and antibacterial activity against Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and antifungal activity against Candida albicans [75].
In other research, the essential oils of Pinus brutia and Pinus pinea were reported to exert antimicrobial activities against Micrococcus luteus and Bacillus subtilis and showed activities on Ephestia kuehniella eggs, phytotoxic activities on Lactuca sativa, Lepidium sativum, and Portulaca oleracea, as well as antioxidant potential [13]. Essential oils obtained from Origanum vulgare and Origanum dictamnus had activity against S. aureus; the strain with reference NCTC 6571 was shown to be extremely sensitive in most and was resistant only to essential oils of Ocimum basilicum [9]. Essential oils from the leaves and bark of Santiria trimera, distilled in water, were also evaluated. The essential oils in the leaves were dominated by sesquiterpenes (76.5%), among which alpha-humulene (34.6%) and beta-caryophyllene (14.9%) were the main components. The EO of the bark was almost exclusively monoterpene, with alpha-pinene (51.5%) and alpha-terpineol (16.8%) as the main structural compounds, and showed effectiveness against Bacillus cereus and Enterococcus faecalis. The EO of the bark was more active and showed activity against Proteus mirabilis [76]. In the EO extracted by hydro distillation of Origanum acutidens, two components dominated: p-cymene and carvacrol, which were attributed with antibacterial activities against Proteus vulgaris, Salmonella typhimurium, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [77]. EO extracted from Thymus willdenowii Boiss and Reut may be a potential new source of natural antimicrobials that could be applied in the pharmaceutical and food industries [78].
In other studies, it has been mentioned that Eos, such as β-caryophyllene, γ-gurjunene, τ-cadinol, and calamenene, have been obtained from Psidium guajava. The terpenoids in all the sample oils in this plant were mainly sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, followed by oxygenated sesquiterpenes. The evaluation showed that EO had a higher antimicrobial activity against all Gram-positive bacteria and two fungi [79]. The oils of A. wilhelmsii exhibited higher antibacterial and antifungal activities with high effectiveness against Escherichia coli and Candida albicans [80].

6. Essential Oils on Microbes from the Digestive Tract of Broilers

The effect of EO on poultry may not only be limited to animal metabolism but could also extend to the gut microflora. The bacterial populations in broiler chickens are very varied and depend on the anatomical area in their digestive system, substrate, and age; the establishment of the dominant microbiota depends on the feed and the host. There is a relationship between the microbial community that inhabits the gastrointestinal tract and the health of broiler chickens. The intestinal commensal microbiota plays a primary role in preventing the colonization of pathogenic microorganisms in the digestive system by competitive exclusion [81]. In the first 14 days, microorganisms establish themselves in the small intestine, and mainly fecal Streptococci spp. and Coliform bacteria are found until 40 days [82] later, Labobacilus spp. bacteria establish themselves and dominate and are present in between 80 and 90% of the total microbiota [83]. In the cecum, the microbiota is subsequently established around 40 days, mainly with facultative bacteria such as the Enterobacteriaceae family and anaerobic bacteria such as Bacteroides [84]. In the chicken cecum, the most common families within the order Clostridiales are Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Veillonellaceae [85]. In production systems, indicator bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Clostridium perfringens, Staphylococcus spp. [81], and Listeria monocytogenes [86], are monitored due to their importance for animal health and economy, in addition to Enterococcus cecorum and Salmonella due to their importance in monitoring antimicrobial resistance (AMR) [81]. The EOs in chicken feed could be used as alternatives to antibiotics, which generates a modification in the intestinal microbiota; however, it is necessary to study more deeply if the effects of the different types of EOs vary with the microorganism strains.
Essential oils are composed of a wide variety of molecules, as described above; phytotherapy has been isolated in veterinary medicine since ancient times, whose foundations were the Ethnoveterinary Practices [87,88]. EO molecules have digestive enzyme activity and stabilize the intestinal microflora; some of them assist in digestion [89,90,91]; others act against pathogens [42,54,57] or are antioxidant [8,36,37], and together, they optimize intestinal health [87]. In broiler production, to maintain or improve productivity during stress, alternatives such as improving intestinal health have been proposed. Phytopharmaceuticals favor the reduction in pathogens by promoting the replication of microorganisms beneficial to animal health [87].
In one study it was observed that the dietary addition of essential oils showed a decrease in the population of E. coli in the ileocecal digesta. In addition, a high dose of EO resulted in a significant increase in certain activities of digestive enzymes of the pancreas and gut in growing broiler chickens [89]. In another study, it was observed that in the experiment where the group with antibiotics showed the lowest count of Lactobacillus spp. and the highest count of Escherichia coli in the ileal digesta, the group of broiler chickens fed with the diet supplemented with essential oils had reduced E. coli populations [92]. Results of another research suggest that cinnamon bark oil at 0.3 g/kg diet and polyunsaturated fatty acids could reduce pathogenic bacteria in the gut and improve gut morphology along with improving the immune response of broiler chickens [93].
The effect of feeding diets supplemented with essential oils on broiler chickens’ productive performance and gut microbiota has been reported. The evidence shows that supplementation with essential oils exerts a positive effect on the gut microbiota with an improvement in growth performance [94,95,96,97,98]. Modulating the composition and activity of the intestinal microbiota of broiler chickens with essential oils has been suggested to be effective in improving broiler performance [94].

7. Influence of Essential Oil Molecules on Broiler Chicken Production

In broiler chicken production, essential oils from plants are suggested as growth promoters as an alternative to conventional antibiotics; however, the enhancement expected in the productive behavior of broiler chickens receiving essential oils is not always observed. In another study, they found no influence of essential oils (thymol) on production variables in broiler chickens [89]. Other researchers also reported no improvement in the productive performance of broiler chickens supplemented with a compound consisting of carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde and eugenol (extracted from oregano, cinnamon and cloves, respectively). The lack of response was attributed to the good nutritional and sanitary management of birds. In other cases, the productive variables of weight gain or feed efficiency can be absent when essential oils are supplemented to broiler chickens; however, they cause beneficial effects in different ways [99]. Another study, in broiler chicken fed diets with the addition of essential oils containing cinnamaldehyde and thymol, did not find changes in weight gain, feed intake, or feed efficiency; however, the positive influence of essential oils on mortality reduction when compared to animals from the none-treated group [100]. In different results observed greater weight gain and enhanced feed conversion when broiler chickens received similar essential oils in their diet [101]. Different results between different studies are difficult to establish; however, differences are observed in the diets, with lower concentrations of crude protein and energy [100]. This way, the diet composition of broiler chickens must be considered when essential oils are supplemented (Table 3).
The quadratic tendency may indicate that the productive efficiency is improved, and when it is at the maximum peak, no further improvement can be achieved. In a report where they used a mixture of essential oils (thymol, carvacrol, and cinnamaldehyde), they observed a quadratic enhancement in the body weight of broilers during the initial growing phase. Essential oils did not influence the productive variables during the finisher phase or total trial. In this study, it is difficult to explain the low influence of the essential oils on the productive variables of broiler chickens in the overall period, particularly considering that essential oils had significant improvement in the digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, ether extract, and gross energy [102]. Consistently, several authors reported that broiler chickens receiving diets with a blend of essential oils (thymol and vanillin) plus organic acids (citric acid and sorbic acid) had improved weight gain and feed conversion in the starter phase [103,104]. Nevertheless, in the finisher phase, the productive performance was not changed by the essential oils plus organic acids. In these reports [102,103,104], the essential oils probably contributed by supporting the higher nutrient requirements in the starter phase. However, in the finisher phase, there are lower nutrient requirements, and if the diets are rich in nutrients, they provide a lower opportunity to show the positive influences of the essential oils. Moreover, other aspects may also contribute, for example, adequate management practices in all aspects. On the other hand, it has been suggested that greater doses of the essential oils during the finisher phase could be required, although the research reports used the same dose of essential oils during both the starter and finisher phases [105].
In other conditions, the favorable influences of essential oils on the productive performance of broiler chickens can be evidenced with other probiotic complements. Gumus and Gelen (2023) did not find the influence of essential oils from thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) at 0.15 g/kg and 0.30 g/kg or rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) at 0.10 g/kg and 0.20 g/kg on the production variables (weight gain, feed intake, or feed conversion) of broiler chickens. Probably, the essential oil of thyme was not used in sufficient amounts to influence the productive performance of broiler chickens. Conversely, essential oils from thyme may have a synergic influence on the productive behavior of broiler chickens when complemented with a probiotic [106]. In research reports, when compared to animals of control groups, enhanced live weight gain and feed conversion efficiency were observed in broiler chickens receiving a probiotic plus essential oils from thyme (T. vulgaris L.) at 0.75 g/kg [105] and 1.0 g/kg [107].
There might be a synergic influence on the productive behavior of broiler chickens when combining two or more different essential oils or with essential oils plus other feed additives. In a study they mentioned that the use of 100 mg/kg of a blend of carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, and capsicum oleoresin in diets enhanced the gain efficiency of broiler chickens; the improvements were related to improvement in dietary metabolizable energy value by about 50 kcal/kg [108]. Another researcher report that a mixture of essential oils (thymol + carvacrol) enhanced the live weight and feed efficiency of broiler chickens. The effect was evident at 60 ppm of the mixture of essential oils [90]. In another study, they found improved feed conversion efficiency and weight gain in broiler chickens receiving a supplement formed by carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, and capsicum in the diet during the starter phase of feeding (1–21 d) [109].
Researchers reported that a blend of essential oils plus organic acids (thymol, sorbic acid, and fumaric acid) and enramycin enhanced feed conversion due to their antimicrobial action [92]. Another group of researchers tested organic acids (benzoic acid, formic acid, and lactic acid) and/or essential oils (cinnamaldehyde, carvacrol, thymol, and eugenol) in broiler chickens; essential oils enhanced feed conversion in the starter phase, but no influence was observed during the finisher phase. The combination of essential oils with organic acids had no additional influence on the production of broiler chicken. However, improved broiler chicken production is not always reported with essential oils [110]. Other researchers have reported finding no influence of plant oils (eucalyptus oil, carvacrol, cinnamyl aldehyde, capsaicin) on the production variables (weight gain, feed intake, or feed conversion) of broiler chickens [111].
Effect of essential oils on production in challenged broiler chicken: there are some research reports that evidence the positive influence of essential oils on the productive performance of broiler chickens that were challenged or exposed to different, potentially pathogenic microbes [62,112,113]. The productive performance enhancement of challenged broiler chickens is consistent with the supplementation of different EOs. In broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria spp. and Clostridium perfringens, tested a compound of organic acids (fumaric, sorbic, malic, and citric acids) plus essential oils (thymol, vanillin, and eugenol). When compared to the non-treated group, both essential oils and antibiotics were effective in improving the productive behavior of broiler chickens; they suggested the use of essential oils as a replacement for antibiotics as growth promoters for broiler chickens for commercial purposes [114]. Other researchers in their reports also observed improved productive performance in broiler chickens infected with Salmonella Enteritidis (S. enteritidis) when feeding coated essential oils and organic acid mixture (thymol, carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, caprylic acid, benzoic acid, and butyric acid) [115,116]. Similarly, another group of researchers, in broiler chickens challenged with pathogenic E. coli, found that 400 mg/kg of eugenol in a nano-emulsion improved growth efficiency [117]. Also in another study in broiler chickens challenged with necrotic enteritis found that 100 ppm of an encapsulated compound of eugenol and garlic tincture enhanced feed conversion efficiency, reducing feed intake and maintaining body weight at similar levels as challenged birds that did not receive additives in the diet [115]. A group of researchers found that a mixture of EO in drinking water improved weight gain and reduced mortality in broiler chickens exposed to Salmonella Heidelberg [69,118]. In addition, EO reduced SH colonization in the crops of the chickens [118]. Another study on broiler chickens infected with Eimeria tenella (E. tenella) observed that dietary supplementation of 200 mg/kg water-soluble extract of rosemary improved broiler productive behavior and alleviated intestinal damage produced by coccidiosis. The authors suggested that this rosemary extract could contribute to alleviating or controlling coccidiosis in poultry production [119].
Productive performance of broiler chickens: essential oils from oregano. There are various species of oregano in the world; most of them contain thymol and carvacrol as the main active molecules in their essential oils, besides other compounds that are in minor quantities. Most of the research reported improved productive behavior of broiler chickens. Improvements in feed conversion efficiency have been reported in the finishing phase (22 to 42 d) or total feeding period (1 to 42 d) with essential oil from oregano (Origanum vulgare L.). The results were similar to the ones obtained with the coccidiostat (maduramicin ammo-nium) and the ones with the essential oil; however, both treatments had better productive performance than the animals from the non-treated group [120]. Consistently, Mohiti-Asli and Ghanaatparast-Rashti, 2015, also found improved growth performance and coccidia control in broiler chickens receiving essential oils from O. vulgare [61]. In another study, in an experiment with a slow-growing breed of chickens, also found that supplementation with 150 to 300 ppm of essential oils from oregano (extracted from O. vulgare) improved growth performance, with a beneficial effect on the intestine, modulating gut microbes, and on the immune system. The authors proposed essential oils as an option to reduce the antibiotics in broiler chicken production for local breeds [121]. Similarly, it was reported that Mexican oregano essential oils from Lippia berlandieri Schauer and Poliomintha longiflora Gray had beneficial effects on broiler chicken productive behavior and enhanced meat quality [122].
Researchers reported that productive variables were improved more evidently in challenged Eimeria sp. broiler chickens receiving essential oils from Lippia origanoides. Carcass traits were enhanced (main effect) by essential oils [123]. Another study, in broiler chickens under heat stress, tested essential oils from Lippia origanoides alone or in mixtures of Rosmarinus officinalis with red beetroot or natural betaine. Results revealed that all treatments were effective in improving feed conversion efficiency compared to the control group (no additives in diet); however, weights of the carcass were higher in the treatments of blends, including Rosmarinus officinalis with red beetroot or natural betaine, when compared to the control animals or those treated with only Lippia origanoides [124].
Improved growth was reported in broiler chickens fed essential oils from oregano troughs, enhancing the intestinal immune system and alleviating the oxidative stress of broiler chickens. In addition, better responses were observed with natural extracts of essential oils than with synthetic essential oils (a mixture of thymol and carvacrol). The essential oils were at 200 ppm in the diet [125]. Nevertheless, researchers observed better productive performance in broiler chickens fed essential oils from synthetic oregano (thymol and carvacrol). The essential oils were at 200 and 400 ppm in the diet. Probably, in this study, the beneficial effects were more evident by the greater dose of synthetic oregano than those observed by other researchers [63,125].
In a study in broiler chickens reared under heat stress, reported greater final body weight with a single supplementation of vitamin C or oregano (Origanum vulgare L., ssp. Hirtum). However, a synergic effect was observed with the combination of both additives (vitamin C plus the essential oil) where the animals had 200 g more body weight than the control group [126]. Tekce and Gül (2016) reported that essential oils from Origanum syriacum had evident improvement in productive performance in broiler chickens under comfort temperature (22 °C), while under heat stress (36 °C) the improvement in the productive performance was almost nonappreciable [127]. Another investigation, in broiler chicken diets, used a mixture of essential oils formed by extracts from oregano, rosemary, cinnamon, and chili pepper. Related to the control group (with no additives), the animals fed diets with essential oils had similar feed intake; however, accumulated weight gain and feed conversion efficiency of broiler chickens were significantly improved with the essential oils [128].
There is limited information on where essential oils from oregano did not have an effect on the productive behavior of broiler chickens. Other researchers did not report improvement in weight gain or feed conversion in broiler chickens receiving 50 or 100 mg/kg of essential oils from oregano in the feed. There might be different factors that influenced this difference with respect to other reports that found the improved productive performance of the chickens. In particular, we observed that the low dose of oils from oregano in this study could be related to the lack of effect on the production of broiler chickens [129]. In another study neither reported improvement in feed efficiency in broiler chickens receiving 0.01% oregano oil (Origanum vulgare L.) or 0.005% oregano oil and 1% oregano powder. Also, this essential oil dose is low in order to promote the growth increase in the broiler chickens [130].
Productive performance of broiler chickens; essential oils from Cinnamon: the essential oils from cinnamon, or the cinnamaldehyde (extracted from oils from Cinnamon), did not show consistent improvement in the productive performance of broiler chickens. In a preliminary report did not find differences in weight gain and feed conversion in female broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with thymol, cinnamaldehyde, and a commercial mixture of essential oil components [91]. In the same manner, Yang et al. [131] tested Cinnamon essential oil alone or combined with bamboo leaf flavonoid in broiler chickens. The treatments had no effects on the productive variables of weight gain, feed intake, or feed conversion efficiency. Yang et al. (2021) also observed no improved productive performance of broiler chickens with cinnamaldehyde (CIN) at 50 mg/kg or 100 mg/kg in the feed; however, mortality reduction was observed with CIN [132].
In one study it was observed that encapsulated CIN or citral improved the productive performance of broiler chickens, although no additive effect among the two additives was found. Likewise, the combination of cinnamaldehyde with other extracts or medium-chain fatty acids has been explored [133]. Other researchers observed that a compound of microencapsulated carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde improved the productive variables of broiler chickens [134]. In another study reported enhanced growth performance, intestinal morphology, and gut microorganisms of yellow-feathered broiler chickens supplemented with a complex of lauric acid monoglyceride and cinnamaldehyde in the diet [135].
The differences in the productive behavior of broiler chickens shown in the different reports might be due to different factors like sanitary management, environmental conditions, feed management, and other factors like the dose and presentation of the essential oils. In broiler chickens receiving essential oils from Thyme (Thymus vulgaris), cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum), and mint (Mentha piperita) in two forms—free form and encapsulated form—observed that the encapsulated form had superior improvement on the productive variables than free form of essential oils [136]. In relation to the health status of the broiler chickens that were not challenged with E. coli, did not find improvement in productive behavior with using a blend of cinnamaldehyde plus organic acids, but the productive performance was improved when challenged animals received the same additives. It was postulated that productive performance enhancement was related to improvement in the health status of the animals [137]. Similarly, researchers reported improved productive behavior of broiler chickens challenged with coccidia when essential oils (garlic and cinnamon extracts) and betaine were supplemented [138]. In other research also reported that the enhancement in productive behavior was evident when encapsulated essential oils from cinnamon were fed to broiler chickens during the warm season of the year and presented a necrotic enteritis outbreak. In addition, the essential oils also reduced the mortality of birds [139].
Productive performance of broiler chickens: essential oils from Lavender. Consistently, the essential oil of lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) in the drinking water has enhanced the live weight gain and feed conversion efficiency of broiler chickens compared to a non-treated group of animals. These studies suggested the lavender addition to drinking water during the finisher phase was enough to improve the production of broiler chickens [73,140]. Similarly, other researchers also found improvements in weight gain and feed conversion ratio during the finisher phase and for the total feeding cycle of broiler chickens receiving lavender essential oil in the diet. Similar enhancements in the growth performance of broiler chickens supplemented with lavender essential oil and the antibiotic virginiamycin were observed in this research compared to the non-treated group of animals [141].
Only a small improvement in the productive behavior of broiler chickens was observed when lavender essential oil was tested at different levels in broiler chickens fed during three phases: starter (3 to 10 d); grower (11 to 23 d); and finisher (24 to 35 d). When compared to the non-treated group, the only influence they observed was an improved feed conversion ratio in the grower phase. There was no effect of treatment on the productive variables of broiler chickens during the starter and finisher phases [142]. Moreover, in another investigation did not observe a benefit in the productive performance of broiler chickens supplemented with lavender essential oils. This research included lower crude protein than previous reports [143].
Productive performance of broiler chickens: essential oils from Rosmarinus officinalis (Rosemary). In a preliminary study, they reported improved productive performance of broiler chickens supplemented with essential oils from rosemary, which had cineole as the main active compound [42]. In a study, improved productive performance of broiler chickens supplemented with both non-encapsulated and encapsulated rosemary essential oils was also observed; however, the non-encapsulated EO reduced the ileal coliform count and had greater antioxidant activity than the encapsulated form. In this study, non-encapsulated rosemary essential oils at 150 mg/kg were suggested for poultry production [144]. A group of researchers found that nanoencapsulated essential oils from rosemary were more effective than free forms of essential oils from rosemary in enhancing the productive behavior of broiler chickens, especially at 200 mg/kg feed. In this report, the major active compounds in the essential oils from rosemary were camphor, α-Pinene, and 1,8-Cineole [145]. It was also published, in broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria tenella (E. tenella), reported that dietary supplementation of 200 mg/kg water-soluble extract of rosemary improved broiler productive performance and alleviated gut damage caused by coccidiosis. The authors suggested that this rosemary extract could contribute to alleviating or controlling coccidiosis in poultry production [119]. Similarly, in Japanese quails under heat stress, found that rosemary oil (Cineole as the main compound) improved the feed conversion ratio [146].
There are few reports where rosemary essential oils did not improve the productive performance of broiler chickens. Researchers reported that rosemary or oregano essential oils used separately did not change the productive performance of broiler chickens; however, when they were blended (rosemary + oregano), the production was enhanced. In this case, pinene, cineole, and borneol were the main compounds in rosemary oils [147]. in another research argued that under heat stress conditions, rosemary essential oils (ferruginol was the main compound) in the feed did not improve the production of broiler chickens. Although, under these conditions, oregano essential oils were effective in improving the productive performance of the birds. The difference in the productive responses of broiler chickens in the different reports can be attributable to the differences in the active compounds in the oils from rosemary and could be associated with the different extraction methods of the oils from rosemary [148].
Productive performance of broiler chickens: essential oils from garlic. In a preliminary study did not observe the influence of essential oils from garlic on the feed conversion efficiency of broiler chickens [149]. However, in another research found that improved feed efficiency of broiler chickens was evident at 100 ppm of garlic acid. The authors also observed that the encapsulated form had superior improvement on the productive variables than the free form of essential oils from garlic [70]. Similarly, in another research, in broiler chickens raised under high ambient temperatures, found improved feed conversion efficiency by supplementing essential oils from garlic and/or lemon. The enhancement was evident in the finisher phase and the total period [150].
Productive performance of broiler chickens: essential oils from other plants. Different essential oils from different plants have improved the productive performance of broiler chickens; among them are Coriander sativum [151,152,153], Capsicum annum [154,155], Syzygium aromaticum [156,157], Monarda didyma L. [71], a blend of parsley, mint, and carrot seed oils supplemented with black pepper oil or radish seed oil [158].

8. Research Perspectives on Essential Oils in the Production of Broiler Chickens

Since antiquity, traditional medicine and agri-food science have benefited from compounds obtained from plants. In this bibliographic research, it was detected that plant essential oils are presented as a feasible option to reduce the quantity of antibiotics in broiler chicken production. Numerous research has been undertaken to understand the action mechanisms of essential oils and their active compounds from different plants. To promote growth in broiler chickens, the essential oils had antioxidant effects, reduced pathogenic bacteria and coccidia, and improved the digestion and metabolism of poultry. With this scenario, there are still various plants in the world to study. Future research considering the synergic effect of different essential oils from different plants and with other feed additives is warranted.
In the present research, we also detected that there were different procedures for the extraction of essential oils from different plants. There are also different forms of essential oils, such as liquid, encapsulated, or nanoparticles. A challenge is the standardization of essential oils that must contain an adequate dose of active molecules to be used in broiler chicken production. Other themes in essential oils that have received minor attention but need to be attended to are the security for the broiler chicken and humans. Additionally, the impact of the essential oils from plants on the environment also needs to be attended to. In total, broiler chicken production must be seen in a holistic way to maintain sustainability as food for humans.
Conclusion: Several researchers have focused their studies on the search for essential oils, observing the variability of phytochemical compounds and verifying their antimicrobial, antioxidant, and other effects; it has been proposed that together, they improve intestinal health and fight pathogens; so, the supply of EO in broiler chicken diets has begun to be evaluated to help maintain a varied microbiota in the intestine and consequently better health and production in birds. Further research is needed to establish the standardization of EO active molecules, as well as the interaction with other feed additives and their impact on the health and production of broiler chickens. In addition, safety for consumers and the environment must be considered.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S.-C.; methodology, H.B.B.-G.; investigation EO Compounds, Modes of Action, Antimicrobial Activity, H.B.B.-G.; investigation EO Broiler Chicken Production; resources J.S.-C. and H.B.B.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S.-C. and H.B.B.-G.; writing—review and editing, J.S.-C. and H.B.B.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We thank the Tamaulipas Council of Science and Technology (COTACYT) for supporting the publication of this article.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available in a publicly accessible repository.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Aarestrup, F.M.; Bager, F.; Jensen, N.E.; Madsen, M.; Meyling, A.; Wegener, H.C. Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria Isolated from Food Animals to Antimicrobial Growth Promoters and Related Therapeutic Agents in Denmark. APMIS 1998, 106, 606–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Torres, C.; Zarazaga, M. Antibióticos Como Promotores Del Crecimiento En Animales: ¿Vamos Por El Buen Camino? Gac. Sanit. 2002, 16, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). Uso de Antimicrobianos Como Promotores de Crecimiento. 2023. Available online: https://www.woah.org/app/uploads/2024/01/es-omsa-declaraciondeposicion-agp.pdf (accessed on 20 October 2024).
  4. Toso, F.; Mestorino, N.; Ardoino, S. Aceites Esenciales Como Alternativa a Los Antibióticos Promotores de Crecimiento En Pollos de Engorde. Investig. Joven 2023, 10, 444–445. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sakkas, H.; Papadopoulou, C. Antimicrobial Activity of Basil, Oregano, and Thyme Essential Oils. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kraimi, N.; Dawkins, M.; Gebhardt-Henrich, S.G.; Velge, P.; Rychlik, I.; Volf, J.; Creach, P.; Smith, A.; Colles, F.; Leterrier, C. Influence of the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis on Behavior and Welfare in Farm Animals: A Review. Physiol. Behav. 2019, 210, 112658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Qamar, A.; Waheed, J.; Hamza, A.; Mohyuddin, S.G.; Lu, Z.; Namula, Z.; Chenand, Z.; Chen, J.J. The Role of Intestinal of Microbiota in Chicken Health, Intestinal Physiology and Immunity. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2020, 31, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological Effects of Essential Oils–A Review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alexopoulos, A.; Kimbaris, A.C.; Plessas, S.; Mantzourani, I.; Theodoridou, I.; Stavropoulou, E.; Polissiou, M.G.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Antibacterial Activities of Essential Oils from Eight Greek Aromatic Plants against Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus Aureus. Anaerobe 2011, 17, 399–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aziz, Z.A.; Ahmad, A.; Setapar, S.H.; Karakucuk, A.; Azim, M.M.; Lokhat, D.; Rafatullah, M.; Ganash, M.; Kamal, M.A.; Ashraf, G.M. Essential Oils: Extraction Techniques, Pharmaceutical And Therapeutic Potential-A Review. Curr. Drug Metab. 2018, 19, 1100–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ding, W.; Liping, N.; Xing, H.; Wei, Z.; Zhoua, Q.; Nong, R.; Chen, J. Essential Oil Extracted from Leaf of Phoebe Bournei (Hemsl.) Yang: Chemical Constituents, Antitumor, Antibacterial, Hypoglycemic Activities. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 34, 2524–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pérez Zamora, C.; Torres, C.A.; Nuñez, M.B. Antimicrobial Activity and Chemical Composition of Essential Oils from Verbenaceae Species Growing in South America. Molecules 2018, 23, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ulukanli, Z.; Karabörklü, S.; Bozok, F.; Ates, B.; Erdogan, S.; Cenet, M.; Karaaslan, M.G. Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial, Insecticidal, Phytotoxic and Antioxidant Activities of Mediterranean Pinus Brutia and Pinus Pinea Resin Essential Oils. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2014, 12, 901–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Janacua-Vidales, H.; Alarcón-Rojo, A.; Elisea, J.Q.; Cardona-Hernández, M. Aceites Esenciales de Orégano En La Dieta de Cerdos Para Mejorar Las Características de La Canal. Cult. Cient. Y Tecnol. 2018, 15, 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  15. Stelter, K.; Frahm, J.; Berk, A.; Dänicke, S.; Hernández, A. Efecto Del Orégano Seco En Dietas Para Transición Sobre El Rendimiento y Los Factores Inmunomoduladores. Albéitar Publ. Vet. Indep. 2015, 186, 36–37. [Google Scholar]
  16. Martínez, R.M.; Cerrilla, M.E.O.; Haro, J.G.H.; Garza, J.R.K.; Ramos, J.Z.; Soriano, R.R. Uso de Aceites Esenciales En Animales de Granja. Interciencia 2015, 40, 744–754. [Google Scholar]
  17. Edris, A.E. Pharmaceutical and Therapeutic Potentials of Essential Oils and Their Individual Volatile Constituents: A Review. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 308–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Freires, I.A.; Denny, C.; Benso, B.; Alencar, S.M.D.; Rosalen, P.L. Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils and Their Isolated Constituents against Cariogenic Bacteria: A Systematic Review. Molecules 2015, 20, 7329–7358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rota, C.; Carraminana, J.J.; Burillo, J.; Herrera, A. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils from Aromatic Plants against Selected Foodborne Pathogens. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 1252–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Burt, S.A.; Vlielander, R.; Haagsman, H.P.; Veldhuizen, E.J. Increase in Activity of Essential Oil Components Carvacrol and Thymol against Escherichia Coli O157:H7 by Addition of Food Stabilizers. J. Food Prot. 2005, 68, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Porazinska, D.L.; Farrer, E.C.; Spasojevic, M.J.; Bueno de Mesquita, C.P.; Sartwell, S.A.; Smith, J.G.; White, C.T.; King, A.J.; Suding, K.N.; Schmidt, S.K. Plant Diversity and Density Predict Belowground Diversity and Function in an Early Successional Alpine Ecosystem. Ecology 2018, 99, 1942–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. da Costa, J.S.; da Cruz, E.D.N.S.; Setzer, W.N.; da Silva, J.K.D.R.; Maia, J.G.S.; Figueiredo, P.L.B. Essentials Oils from Brazilian Eugenia and Syzygium Species and Their Biological Activities. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hoffmann, K.H. Essential Oils. Z. Naturforschung C 2020, 75, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Seow, Y.X.; Yeo, C.R.; Chung, H.L.; Yuk, H.G. Plant Essential Oils as Active Antimicrobial Agents. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54, 625–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, Y.; Yang, Y.H.; Ye, M.; Wang, K.B.; Fan, L.M.; Su, F.W. Chemical Composition and Antifungal Activity of Essential Oil from Origanum Vulgare against Botrytis Cinerea. Food Chem. 2021, 365, 130506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Upadhyaya, S.; Khatiwora, E.; Bora, D.K. Estimation of Total Phenol and Flavonoid Contents of Citrus Limon L Burmf Leaves from North Eastern Region of India. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2019, 9, 40–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bozin, B.; Mimica-Dukic, N.; Samojlik, I.; Jovin, E. Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties of Rosemary and Sage (Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Salvia officinalis L., Lamiaceae) Essential Oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 7879–7885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mulyaningsih, S.; Sporer, F.; Reichling, J.; Wink, M. Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils from Eucalyptus and of Selected Components against Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Pathogens. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 893–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ben Marzoug, H.N.; Bouajila, J.; Ennajar, M.; Lebrihi, A.; Mathieu, F.; Couderc, F.; Abderraba, M.; Romdhane, M. Eucalyptus (Gracilis, Oleosa, Salubris, and Salmonophloia) Essential Oils: Their Chemical Composition and Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities. J. Med. Food 2010, 13, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhang, C.; Fan, L.; Fan, S.; Wang, J.; Luo, T.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yu, L. Cinnamomum Cassia Presl: A Review of Its Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology and Toxicology. Molecules 2019, 24, 3473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dosoky, N.S.; Setzer, W.N. Chemical Composition and Biological Activities of Essential Oils of Curcuma Species. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bajpai, V.K.; Sharma, A.; Kim, S.H.; Baek, K.H. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, Lipid Peroxidation Inhibition and Free Radical Scavenging Activities of Microwave Extracted Essential Oil from Allium Sativum. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2015, 18, 300–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Santin, M.R.; dos Santos, A.O.; Nakamura, C.V.; Dias Filho, B.P.; Ferreira, I.C.P.; Ueda-Nakamura, T. In Vitro Activity of the Essential Oil of Cymbopogon Citratus and Its Major Component (Citral) on Leishmania Amazonensis. Parasitol. Res. 2009, 105, 1489–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Can Baser, K.H. Biological and Pharmacological Activities of Carvacrol and Carvacrol Bearing Essential Oils. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2008, 14, 3106–3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Adaszyńska, M.; Swarcewicz, M.; Dzięcioł, M.; Dobrowolska, A. Comparison of Chemical Composition and Antibacterial Activity of Lavender Varieties from Poland. Nat. Prod. Res. 2013, 27, 1497–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Karakaya, S.; El, S.N.; Karagözlü, N.; Şahin, S. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Essential Oils Obtained from Oregano (Origanum vulgare Ssp. Hirtum) by Using Different Extraction Methods. J. Med. Food. 2011, 14, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Salleh, W.M.N.H.W.; Ahmad, F.; Yen, K.H. Chemical Compositions and Biological Activities of the Essential Oils of Beilschmiedia Madang Blume (Lauraceae). Arch. Pharm. Res. 2015, 38, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Semerdjieva, I.; Zheljazkov, V.D.; Radoukova, T.; Dincheva, I.; Piperkova, N.; Maneva, V.; Astatkie, T.; Kačániová, M. Biological Activity of Essential Oils of Four Juniper Species and Their Potential as Biopesticides. Molecules 2021, 26, 6358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Arana-Sánchez, A.; Estarrón-Espinosa, M.; Obledo-Vázquez, E.N.; Padilla-Camberos, E.; Silva-Vázquez, R.; Lugo-Cervantes, E. Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Mexican Oregano Essential Oils (Lippia Graveolens H. B. K.) with Different Composition When Microencapsulated Inβ-Cyclodextrin. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 50, 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Clavijo-Romero, A.; Quintanilla-Carvajal, M.X.; Ruiz, Y. Stability and Antimicrobial Activity of Eucalyptus Essential Oil Emulsions. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2019, 25, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Isabel, B.; Santos, Y. Efectos de Los Aceites Esenciales En La Alimentación de Los Pollos de Carne. Arch. Zootec. 2009, 58, 597–600. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mathlouthi, N.; Bouzaienne, T.; Oueslati, I.; Recoquillay, F.; Hamdi, M.; Urdaci, M.; Bergaoui, R. Use of Rosemary, Oregano, and a Commercial Blend of Essential Oils in Broiler Chickens: In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities and Effects on Growth Performance1. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90, 813–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Arrigoni, R.; Ballini, A.; Jirillo, E.; Santacroce, L. Current View on Major Natural Compounds Endowed with Antibacterial and Antiviral Effects. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Smith-Palmer, A.; Stewart, J.; Fyfe, L. Inhibition of Listeriolysin O and Phosphatidylcholine-Specific Production in Listeria Monocytogenes by Subinhibitory Concentrations of Plant Essential Oils. J. Med. Microbiol. 2002, 51, 567–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ultee, A.; Kets, E.P.W.; Smid, E.J. Mechanisms of Action of Carvacrol on the Food-Borne Pathogen Bacillus cereus. Appl. Envron. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 4606–4610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ultee, A.; Slump, R.A.; Steging, G.; Smid, E.J. Antimicrobial Activity of Carvacrol toward Bacillus Cereus on Rice. J. Food Prot. 2000, 63, 620–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ultee, A.; Bennik, M.H.J.; Moezelaar, R. The Phenolic Hydroxyl Group of Carvacrol Is Essential for Action against the Food-Borne Pathogen Bacillus cereus. Appl. Envron. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 1561–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saad, N.Y.; Muller, C.D.; Lobstein, A. Major Bioactivities and Mechanism of Action of Essential Oils and Their Components. Flavour Fragr. J. 2013, 28, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Carson, C.F.; Mee, B.J.; Riley, T.V. Mechanism of Action of Melaleuca alternifolia (Tea Tree) Oil on Staphylococcus aureus Determined by Time-Kill, Lysis, Leakage, and Salt Tolerance Assays and Electron Microscopy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 1914–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cox, S.D.; Mann, C.M.; Markham, J.L.; Bell, H.C.; Gustafson, J.E.; Warmington, J.R.; Wyllie, S.G. The Mode of Antimicrobial Action of the Essential Oil of Melaleuca Alternifolia (Tea Tree Oil). J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 88, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gill, A.O.; Holley, R.A. Mechanisms of Bactericidal Action of Cinnamaldehyde against Listeria Monocytogenes and of Eugenol against L. monocytogenes and Lactobacillus sakei. Appl. Envron. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 5750–5755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Carrasco, F.R.; Schmidt, G.; Romero, A.L.; Sartoretto, J.L.; Caparroz-Assef, S.M.; Bersani-Amado, C.A.; Cuman, R.K.N. Immunomodulatory Activity of Zingiber officinale Roscoe, Salvia officinalis L. and Syzygium aromaticum L. Essential Oils: Evidence for Humor- and Cell-Mediated Responses. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2010, 61, 961–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hammer, K.A.; Carson, C.F.; Riley, T.V. Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils and Other Plant Extracts. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1999, 86, 985–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dewi, G.; Nair, D.V.; Peichel, C.; Johnson, T.J.; Noll, S.; Kollanoor, J.A. Effect of Lemongrass Essential Oil against Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella Heidelberg and Its Attachment to Chicken Skin and Meat. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lin, X.; Cao, S.; Sun, J.; Lu, D.; Zhong, B.; Chun, J. The Chemical Compositions, and Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities of Four Types of Citrus Essential Oils. Molecules 2021, 26, 3412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Geraci, A.; Di Stefano, V.; Di Martino, E.; Schillaci, D.; Schicchi, R. Essential Oil Components of Orange Peels and Antimicrobial Activity. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 653–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Stojiljkovic, J.; Trajchev, M.; Nakov, D.; Petrovska, M. Antibacterial Activities of Rosemary Essential Oils and Their Components against Pathogenic Bacteria. Adv. Cytol. Pathol. 2018, 3, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Negi, P.S.; Jayaprakasha, G.K.; Jagan Mohan Rao, L.; Sakariah, K.K. Antibacterial Activity of Turmeric Oil: A Byproduct from Curcumin Manufacture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 4297–4300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Adaszyńska-Skwirzyńska, M.; Szczerbińska, D. The Antimicrobial Activity of Lavender Essential Oil (Lavandula angustifolia) and Its Influence on the Production Performance of Broiler Chickens. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 102, 1020–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Andrade-Ochoa, S.; Correa-Basurto, J.; Rodríguez-Valdez, L.M.; Sánchez-Torres, L.E.; Nogueda-Torres, B.; Nevárez-Moorillón, G.V. In Vitro and in Silico Studies of Terpenes, Terpenoids and Related Compounds with Larvicidal and Pupaecidal Activity against Culex Quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). Chem. Cent. J. 2018, 12, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mohiti-Asli, M.; Ghanaatparast-Rashti, M. Dietary Oregano Essential Oil Alleviates Experimentally Induced Coccidiosis in Broilers. Prev. Vet. Med. 2015, 120, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gordillo Jaramillo, F.X.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, S.H.; Kwon, S.K.; Jha, R.; Lee, K.W. Role of Oregano and Citrus Species-Based Essential Oil Preparation for the Control of Coccidiosis in Broiler Chickens. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 12, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ding, Y.; Hu, Y.; Yao, X.; He, Y.; Chen, J.; Wu, J.; Wu, S.; Zhang, H.; He, X.; Song, Z. Dietary Essential Oils Improves the Growth Performance, Antioxidant Properties and Intestinal Permeability by Inhibiting Bacterial Proliferation, and Altering the Gut Microbiota of Yellow-Feather Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 102087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Avanço, G.B.; Ferreira, F.D.; Bomfim, N.S.; Santos, P.A.; Peralta, R.M.; Brugnari, T.; Mallmann, C.A.; Abreu, F.B.A.; Mikcha, J.M.; Machinski, M. Curcuma longa L. essential oil composition, antioxidant effect, and effect on Fusarium verticillioides and fumonisin production. Food Control 2017, 73, 806–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Singh, G.; Kapoor, I.P.S.; Singh, P.; de Heluani, C.S.; de Lampasona, M.P.; Catalan, C.A. Comparative Study of Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Fresh and Dry Rhizomes of Turmeric (Curcuma longa Linn.). Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 1026–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Witkowska, D.; Sowińska, J. The Effectiveness of Peppermint and Thyme Essential Oil Mist in Reducing Bacterial Contamination in Broiler Houses. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 2834–2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Elaissi, A.; Rouis, Z.; Salem, N.A.; Mabrouk, S.; ben Salem, Y.; Salah, K.B.; Aouni, M.; Farhat, F.; Chemli, R.; Harzallah-Skhiri, F.; et al. Chemical Composition of 8 Eucalyptus Species’ Essential Oils and the Evaluation of Their Antibacterial, Antifungal and Antiviral Activities. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 12, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Marzoug, H.N.B.; Romdhane, M.; Lebrihi, A.; Mathieu, F.; Couderc, F.; Abderraba, M.; Khouja, M.L.; Bouajila, J. Eucalyptus oleosa Essential Oils: Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of the Oils from Different Plant Parts (Stems, Leaves, Flowers and Fruits). Molecules 2011, 16, 1695–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Alali, W.Q.; Hofacre, C.L.; Mathis, G.F.; Faltys, G. Effect of Essential Oil Compound on Shedding and Colonization of Salmonella Enterica Serovar Heidelberg in Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 836–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Amiri, N.; Afsharmanesh, M.; Salarmoini, M.; Meimandipour, A.; Hosseini, S.A.; Ebrahimnejad, H. Nanoencapsulation (in Vitro and in Vivo) as an Efficient Technology to Boost the Potential of Garlic Essential Oil as Alternatives for Antibiotics in Broiler Nutrition. Animal 2021, 15, 100022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Côté, H.; Pichette, A.; St-Gelais, A.; Legault, J. The Biological Activity of Monarda Didyma L. Essential Oil and Its Effect as a Diet Supplement in Mice and Broiler Chicken. Molecules 2021, 26, 3368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Carrasco, A.; Tomas, V.; Tudela, J.; Miguel, M.G. Comparative Study of GC-MS Characterization, Antioxidant Activity and Hyaluronidase Inhibition of Different Species of Lavandula and Thymus Essential Oils. Flavour Fragr. J. 2016, 31, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Adaszyńska-Skwirzyńska, M.; Szczerbińska, D.; Zych, S. The Use of Lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) Essential Oil as an Additive to Drinking Water for Broiler Chickens and Its In Vitro Reaction with Enrofloxacin. Animals 2021, 11, 1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Mohammadhosseini, M.; Sarker, S.D.; Akbarzadeh, A. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oils and Extracts of Achillea Species and Their Biological Activities: A Review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 199, 257–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Georgiev, V.; Ananga, A.; Dincheva, I.; Badjakov, I.; Gochev, V.; Tsolova, V. Chemical Composition, In Vitro Antioxidant Potential, and Antimicrobial Activities of Essential Oils and Hydrosols from Native American Muscadine Grapes. Molecules 2019, 24, 3355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bikanga, R.; Makani, T.; Agnaniet, H.; Obame, L.C.; Abdoul-Latif, F.M.; Lebibi, J.; Menut, C. Chemical Composition and Biological Activities of Santiria trimera (Burseraceae) Essential Oils from Gabon. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2010, 5, 1934578X1000500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cosge, B.; Turker, A.; Ipek, A.; Gurbuz, B.; Arslan, N. Chemical Compositions and Antibacterial Activities of the Essential Oils from Aerial Parts and Corollas of Origanum Acutidens (Hand.-Mazz.) Ietswaart, an Endemic Species to Turkey. Molecules 2009, 14, 1702–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ouknin, M.; Romane, A.; Costa, J.; Majidi, L. Comparative Study of the Chemical Profiling, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Essential Oils of Different Parts of Thymus willdenowii Boiss & Reut. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 2398–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, L.; Wu, Y.; Huang, T.; Shi, K.; Wu, Z. Chemical Compositions, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Essential Oils of Psidium guajava L. Leaves from Different Geographic Regions in China. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1700114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kazemi, M.; Rostami, H. Chemical Composition and Biological Activities of Iranian Achillea wilhelmsii L. Essential Oil: A High Effectiveness against Candida Spp. and Escherichia Strains. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 286–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Agunos, A.; Léger, D.; Carson, C. Review of Antimicrobial Therapy of Selected Bacterial Diseases in Broiler Chickens in Canada. Can. Vet. J. 2012, 53, 1289–1300. [Google Scholar]
  82. Lan, Y.; Verstegen, M.W.A.; Tamminga, S.; Williams, B.A. The Role of the Commensal Gut Microbial Community in Broiler Chickens. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2005, 61, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rinttilä, T.; Apajalahti, J. Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolites—Implications for Broiler Chicken Health and Performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2013, 22, 647–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhu, X.Y.; Zhong, T.; Pandya, Y.; Joerger, R.D. 16S RRNA-Based Analysis of Microbiota from the Cecum of Broiler Chickens. Appl. Envron. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 124–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Torok, V.A.; Hughes, R.J.; Mikkelsen, L.L.; Perez-Maldonado, R.; Balding, K.; MacAlpine, R.; Percy, N.J.; Ophel-Keller, K. Identification and Characterization of Potential Performance-Related Gut Microbiotas in Broiler Chickens across Various Feeding Trials. Appl. Envron. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 5868–5878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bailey, J.S.; Fletcher, D.L.; Cox, N.A. Listeria Monocytogenes Colonization of Broiler Chickens. Poult. Sci. 1990, 69, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Davidović, V.; Joksimović, M.T.; Stojanović, B.; Relić, R. Plant Usage in Protecting the Farm Animal Health. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb. 2012, 28, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ndlovu, W.; Ronald, M.N.; Mwale, M.; Mellda, N.T.; Segun, O.; Francis, J. Ethnoveterinary Practices for Indigenous Poultry Health Management by Smallholder Farmers. In Herbs and Spices-New Advances; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  89. Jang, I.S.; Ko, Y.H.; Kang, S.Y.; Lee, C.Y. Effect of a Commercial Essential Oil on Growth Performance, Digestive Enzyme Activity and Intestinal Microflora Population in Broiler Chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 134, 304–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hashemipour, H.; Kermanshahi, H.; Golian, A.; Veldkamp, T. Effect of Thymol and Carvacrol Feed Supplementation on Performance, Antioxidant Enzyme Activities, Fatty Acid Composition, Digestive Enzyme Activities, and Immune Response in Broiler Chickens. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 2059–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Lee, K.W.; Everts, H.; Kappert, H.J.; Frehner, M.; Losa, R.; Beynen, A.C. Effects of Dietary Essential Oil Components on Growth Performance, Digestive Enzymes and Lipid Metabolism in Female Broiler Chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2003, 44, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yang, X.; Liu, Y.; Yan, F.; Yang, C.; Yang, X. Effects of Encapsulated Organic Acids and Essential Oils on Intestinal Barrier, Microbial Count, and Bacterial Metabolites in Broiler Chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 2858–2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chowdhury, S.; Mandal, G.P.; Patra, A.K.; Kumar, P.; Samanta, I.; Pradhan, S.; Samanta, A.K. Different Essential Oils in Diets of Broiler Chickens: 2. Gut Microbes and Morphology, Immune Response, and Some Blood Profile and Antioxidant Enzymes. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2018, 236, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tiihonen, K.; Kettunen, H.; Bento, M.H.L.; Saarinen, M.; Lahtinen, S.; Ouwehand, A.C.; Schulze, H.; Rautonen, N. The Effect of Feeding Essential Oils on Broiler Performance and Gut Microbiota. Br. Poult. Sci. 2010, 51, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Adaszyńska-Skwirzyńska, M.; Szczerbińska, D. Use of Essential Oils in Broiler Chicken Production–a Review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2017, 17, 317–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lee, K.W.; Everts, H.; Beynen, A.C. Essential Oils in Broiler Nutrition. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2004, 3, 738–752. [Google Scholar]
  97. Dieumou, F.E.; Teguia, A.; Kuiate, J.R.; Tamokou, J.D.; Fonge, N.B.; Dongmo, M.C. Effects of Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) and Garlic (Allium sativum) Essential Oils on Growth Performance and Gut Microbial Population of Broiler Chickens. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2009, 21, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
  98. Falaki, M.; Shargh, M.S.; Dastar, B.; Hashemi, S.R.; Mahoonak, A.S. Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Intestinal Microflora of Broiler Chickens Fed Diets Containing Carum Copticum Essential Oil. Poult. Sci. J. 2016, 4, 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  99. Cristo, A.B.D.; Schmidt, J.M.; Benito, C.E.; Buzim, R.; Pinto, L.A.D.M.; Fernandes, J.I.M. Effect of the Supplementation of Plant Extracts Based Additive in Broiler Chicken Diets on Productive Performance, Carcass Yield, and Meat Quality. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2022, 24, eRBCA-2021-1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cao, P.H.; Li, F.D.; Li, Y.F.; Ru, Y.J.; Peron, A.; Schulze, H.; Bento, H. Effect of Essential Oils and Feed Enzymes on Performance and Nutrient Utilization in Broilers Fed a Corn/Soy-Based Diet. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2010, 9, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Attia, Y.; Al-Harthi, M.; El-Kelawy, M. Utilisation of Essential Oils as a Natural Growth Promoter for Broiler Chickens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 18, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Su, G.; Wang, L.; Zhou, X.; Wu, X.; Chen, D.; Yu, B.; Huang, Z.; Luo, Y.; Mao, X.; Zheng, P.; et al. Effects of Essential Oil on Growth Performance, Digestibility, Immunity, and Intestinal Health in Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Gheisar, M.M.; Hosseindoust, A.; Kim, I.H. Evaluating the Effect of Microencapsulated Blends of Organic Acids and Essential Oils in Broiler Chickens Diet. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2015, 24, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gao, Y.Y.; Zhang, X.L.; Xu, L.H.; Peng, H.; Wang, C.K.; Bi, Y.Z. Encapsulated Blends of Essential Oils and Organic Acids Improved Performance, Intestinal Morphology, Cecal Microflora, and Jejunal Enzyme Activity of Broilers. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 64, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Amouei, H.; Ferronato, G.; Qotbi, A.A.A.; Bouyeh, M.; Dunne, P.G.; Prandini, A.; Seidavi, A. Effect of Essential Oil of Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) or Increasing Levels of a Commercial Prebiotic (TechnoMOS®) on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Male Broilers. Animals 2021, 11, 3330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Gumus, R.; Gelen, S.U. Effects of Dietary Thyme and Rosemary Essential Oils on Performance Parameters with Lipid Oxidation, Water Activity, PH, Colour and Microbial Quality of Breast and Drumstick Meats in Broiler Chickens. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2023, 66, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Pournazari, M.; Qotbi, A.A.; Seidavi, A.; Corazzin, M. Prebiotics, Probiotics and Thyme (Thymus vulgaris) for Broilers: Performance, Carcass Traits and Blood Variables. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Pecu. 2017, 30, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bravo, D.; Utterback, P.; Parsons, C.M. Evaluation of a Mixture of Carvacrol, Cinnamaldehyde, and Capsicum Oleoresin for Improving Growth Performance and Metabolizable Energy in Broiler Chicks Fed Corn and Soybean Meal. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2011, 20, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Bravo, D.; Pirgozliev, V.; Rose, S.P. A Mixture of Carvacrol, Cinnamaldehyde, and Capsicum Oleoresin Improves Energy Utilization and Growth Performance of Broiler Chickens Fed Maize-Based Diet. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 92, 1531–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Choi, J.; Singh, A.K.; Chen, X.; Lv, J.; Kim, W.K. Application of Organic Acids and Essential Oils as Alternatives to Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Broiler Chickens. Animals 2022, 12, 2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Xue, F.; Shi, L.; Li, Y.; Ni, A.; Ma, H.; Sun, Y.; Chen, J. Effects of Replacing Dietary Aureomycin with a Combination of Plant Essential Oils on Production Performance and Gastrointestinal Health of Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 4521–4529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Pham, V.H.; Abbas, W.; Huang, J.; He, Q.; Zhen, W.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Z. Effect of Blending Encapsulated Essential Oils and Organic Acids as an Antibiotic Growth Promoter Alternative on Growth Performance and Intestinal Health in Broilers with Necrotic Enteritis. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 101563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Pham, V.H.; Abbas, W.; Huang, J.; Guo, F.; Zhang, K.; Kong, L.; Zhen, W.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Z. Dietary Coated Essential Oil and Organic Acid Mixture Supplementation Improves Health of Broilers Infected with Avian Pathogenic Escherichia Coli. Anim. Nutr. 2023, 12, 245–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Stefanello, C.; Rosa, D.P.; Dalmoro, Y.K.; Segatto, A.L.; Vieira, M.S.; Moraes, M.L.; Santin, E. Protected Blend of Organic Acids and Essential Oils Improves Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Intestinal Health of Broiler Chickens Undergoing an Intestinal Challenge. Front. Veter. Sci 2020, 6, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Kumar, A.; Sharma, N.K.; Kheravii, S.K.; Keerqin, C.; Ionescu, C.; Blanchard, A.; Wu, S.B. Potential of a Mixture of Eugenol and Garlic Tincture to Improve Performance and Intestinal Health in Broilers under Necrotic Enteritis Challenge. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 8, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hu, Z.; Liu, L.; Guo, F.; Huang, J.; Qiao, J.; Bi, R.; Huang, J.; Zhang, K.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Z. Dietary Supplemental Coated Essential Oils and Organic Acids Mixture Improves Growth Performance and Gut Health along with Reduces Salmonella Load of Broiler Chickens Infected with Salmonella Enteritidis. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 14, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Ibrahim, D.; Eldemery, F.; Metwally, A.S.; Abd-Allah, E.M.; Mohamed, D.T.; Ismail, T.A.; Hamed, T.A.; Al Sadik, G.M.; Neamat-Allah, A.N.F.; Abd El-Hamid, M.I. Dietary Eugenol Nanoemulsion Potentiated Performance of Broiler Chickens: Orchestration of Digestive Enzymes, Intestinal Barrier Functions and Cytokines Related Gene Expression With a Consequence of Attenuating the Severity of E. coli O78 Infection. Front. Veter Sci. 2022, 9, 847580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Alali, W.Q.; Hofacre, C.L.; Mathis, G.F.; Faltys, G.; Ricke, S.C.; Doyle, M.P. Effect of Non-Pharmaceutical Compounds on Shedding and Colonization of Salmonella Enterica Serovar Heidelberg in Broilers. Food Control 2013, 31, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Peng, F.; Duan, J.; He, X.; Xie, K.; Song, Z. Effects of Dietary Water-Soluble Extract of Rosemary Supplementation on Growth Performance and Intestinal Health of Broilers Infected with Eimeria tenella. J. Anim. Sci. 2024, 102, skae118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Alp, M.; Midilli, M.; Kocabağlı, N.; Yılmaz, H.; Turan, N.; Gargılı, A.; Acar, N. The Effects of Dietary Oregano Essential Oil on Live Performance, Carcass Yield, Serum Immunoglobulin G Level, and Oocyst Count in Broilers. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2012, 21, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ruan, D.; Fan, Q.; Fouad, A.M.; Sun, Y.; Huang, S.; Wu, A.; Lin, C.; Kuang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Jiang, S. Effects of Dietary Oregano Essential Oil Supplementation on Growth Performance, Intestinal Antioxidative Capacity, Immunity, and Intestinal Microbiota in Yellow-Feathered Chickens. J. Anim. Sci. 2021, 99, skab033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Silva-Vázquez, R.; Duran-Meléndez, L.A.; Hernández-Martínez, C.A.; Gutiérrez-Soto, J.G.; Hume, M.E.; Méndez-Zamora, G. Effects of Two Sources of Mexican Oregano Oil on Performance, Blood Profile, Carcass Variables, and Meat of Broilers. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2018, 47, e20170198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Betancourt, L.; Ariza, C.; Gonzalo, D.G.; Germán, A.T. Efecto de Diferentes Niveles de Aceites Esenciales de Lippia Origanoides Kunth En Pollos de Engorde. Rev. MVZ Cordoba 2012, 17, 3033–3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ruff, J.; Tellez, G., Jr.; Forga, A.J.; Señas-Cuesta, R.; Vuong, C.N.; Greene, E.S.; Hernandez-Velasco, X.; Uribe, Á.J.; Martínez, B.C.; Angel-Isaza, J.A.; et al. Evaluation of Three Formulations of Essential Oils in Broiler Chickens under Cyclic Heat Stress. Animals 2021, 11, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zhang, L.Y.; Peng, Q.Y.; Liu, Y.R.; Ma, Q.G.; Zhang, J.Y.; Guo, Y.P.; Xue, Z.; Zhao, L.H. Effects of Oregano Essential Oil as an Antibiotic Growth Promoter Alternative on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Status, and Intestinal Health of Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ghazi, S.; Amjadian, T.; Norouzi, S. Single and Combined Effects of Vitamin C and Oregano Essential Oil in Diet, on Growth Performance, and Blood Parameters of Broiler Chicks Reared under Heat Stress Condition. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2015, 59, 1019–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Tekce, E.; Gül, M. Effects of Origanum Syriacum Essential Oil Added in Different Levels to the Diet of Broilers under Heat Stress on Performance and Intestinal Histology. Eur. Poult. Sci. (EPS) 2016, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Iqbal, H.; Rahman, A.; Khanum, S.; Arshad, M.; Badar, I.H.; Asif, A.R.; Hayat, Z.; Iqbal, M.A. Effect of Essential Oil and Organic Acid on Performance, Gut Health, Bacterial Count and Serological Parameters in Broiler. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2021, 23, eRBCA-2021-1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Botsoglou, N.A.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Christaki, E.; Fletouris, D.J.; Spais, A.B. Effect of Dietary Oregano Essential Oil on Performance of Chickens and on Iron-Induced Lipid Oxidation of Breast, Thigh and Abdominal Fat Tissues. Br. Poult. Sci. 2002, 43, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Turcu, R.P.; Tabuc, C.; Vlaicu, P.A.; Panaite, T.D.; Buleandra, M.; Saracila, M. Effect of the Dietary Oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) Powder and Oil on the Balance of the Intestinal Microflora of Broilers Reared under Heat Stress (32 °C). Sci. Papers. Ser. D. Anim. Sci. 2018, LXI, 77–86. [Google Scholar]
  131. Yang, Y.F.; Zhao, L.L.; Shao, Y.X.; Liao, X.D.; Zhang, L.Y.; Lin, L.U.; Luo, X.G. Effects of Dietary Graded Levels of Cinnamon Essential Oil and Its Combination with Bamboo Leaf Flavonoid on Immune Function, Antioxidative Ability and Intestinal Microbiota of Broilers. J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 2123–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Yang, C.; Diarra, M.S.; Choi, J.; Rodas-Gonzalez, A.; Lepp, D.; Liu, S.; Lu, P.; Mogire, M.; Gong, J.; Wang, Q.; et al. Effects of Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde on Growth Performance, Intestinal Digestive and Absorptive Functions, Meat Quality and Gut Microbiota in Broiler Chickens. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2021, 5, txab099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yang, C.; Kennes, Y.M.; Lepp, D.; Yin, X.; Wang, Q.; Yu, H.; Yang, C.; Gong, J.; Diarra, M.S. Effects of Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral on the Performance and Cecal Microbiota of Broilers Vaccinated or Not Vaccinated against Coccidiosis. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 936–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Bosetti, G.E.; Griebler, L.; Aniecevski, E.; Facchi, C.S.; Baggio, C.; Rossatto, G.; Leite, F.; Valentini, F.D.A.; Santo, A.D.; Pagnussatt, H.; et al. Microencapsulated Carvacrol and Cinnamaldehyde Replace Growth-Promoting Antibiotics: Effect on Performance and Meat Quality in Broiler Chickens. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2020, 92, e20200343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Zheng, C.; Chen, Z.; Yan, X.; Xiao, G.; Qiu, T.; Ou, J.; Cen, M.; Li, W.; Huang, Y.; Cao, Y.; et al. Effects of a Combination of Lauric Acid Monoglyceride and Cinnamaldehyde on Growth Performance, Gut Morphology, and Gut Microbiota of Yellow-Feathered Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Nouri, A. Chitosan Nano-Encapsulation Improves the Effects of Mint, Thyme, and Cinnamon Essential Oils in Broiler Chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2019, 60, 530–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Pathak, M.; Mandal, G.P.; Patra, A.K.; Samanta, I.; Pradhan, S.; Haldar, S. Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Cinnamaldehyde and Formic Acid on Growth Performance, Intestinal Microbiota and Immune Response in Broiler Chickens. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2017, 57, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Fritzlen, C.J.; Wilson, K.M.; Samper, J.M.; Persia, M.E. Effects of Essential Oils and Betaine on Male Broilers Raised on Used Litter Seeded with Coccidia Oocysts. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2024, 33, 100417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kang, H.; Wang, Q.; Yu, H.; Guo, Q.; Weber, L.; Wu, W.; Lepp, D.; Cui, S.W.; Diarra, M.S.; Liu, H.; et al. Validating the Use of a Newly Developed Cinnamaldehyde Product in Commercial Broiler Production. Poult. Sci. 2024, 103, 103625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Adaszyńska-Skwirzyńska, M.; Szczerbińska, D. The Effect of Lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) Essential Oil as a Drinking Water Supplement on the Production Performance, Blood Biochemical Parameters, and Ileal Microflora in Broiler Chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Barbarestani, S.Y.; Jazi, V.; Mohebodini, H.; Ashayerizadeh, A.; Shabani, A.; Toghyani, M. Effects of Dietary Lavender Essential Oil on Growth Performance, Intestinal Function, and Antioxidant Status of Broiler Chickens. Livest. Sci. 2020, 233, 103958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Amer, S.A.; Abdel-Wareth, A.A.; Gouda, A.; Saleh, G.K.; Nassar, A.H.; Sherief, W.R.; Albogami, S.; Shalaby, S.I.; Abdelazim, A.M.; Abomughaid, M.M. Impact of Dietary Lavender Essential Oil on the Growth and Fatty Acid Profile of Breast Muscles, Antioxidant Activity, and Inflammatory Responses in Broiler Chickens. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Mokhtari, S.; Rahati, M.; Seidavi, A.; Haq, Q.M.I.; Kadim, I.; Laudadio, V.; Tufarelli, V. Effects of Feed Supplementation with Lavender (Lavandula Angustifolia) Essence on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, Blood Constituents and Caecal Microbiota of Broiler Chickens. Eur. Poult. Sci. (EPS) 2018, 82, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Mousapour, A.; Salarmoini, M.; Afsharmanesh, M.; Ebrahimnejad, H.; Meimandipour, A.; Amiri, N. Encapsulation of Essential Oils of Rosemary. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2022, 62, 851–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Adil, S.; Banday, M.T.; Hussain, S.A.; Wani, M.A.; Al-Olayan, E.; Patra, A.K.; Rasool, S.; Gani, A.; Sheikh, I.U.; Khan, A.A.; et al. Impact of Nanoencapsulated Rosemary Essential Oil as a Novel Feed Additive on Growth Performance, Nutrient Utilization, Carcass Traits, Meat Quality and Gene Expression of Broiler Chicken. Foods 2024, 13, 1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Ciftci, M.; UG, S.; MA, A.; IH, C.; TONBAK, F. The Effects of Dietary Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) Oil Supplementation on Performance, Carcass Traits and Some Blood Parameters of Japanese Quail Under Heat Stressed Condition. Kafkas Univ. Veter. Fak. Derg. 2013, 19, 595–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Cetin, E.; Anar, B.; Temelli, S.; Cengiz, S.S.; Eren, M. Effect of Dietary Oregano and Rosemary Essential Oil Supplementation on Growth Performance and Cecal Microbiota of Broilers. J. Hell. Veter. Med. Soc. 2023, 73, 4965–4970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Madkour, M.; Alaqaly, A.M.; Soliman, S.S.; Ali, S.I.; Aboelazab, O. Growth Performance, Blood Biochemistry, and MRNA Expression of Hepatic Heat Shock Proteins of Heat-Stressed Broilers in Response to Rosemary and Oregano Extracts. J. Therm. Biol. 2024, 119, 103791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Kırkpınar, F.; Ünlü, H.B.; Özdemir, G. Effects of Oregano and Garlic Essential Oils on Performance, Carcase, Organ and Blood Characteristics and Intestinal Microflora of Broilers. Livest. Sci. 2011, 137, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Elbaz, A.M.; Ashmawy, E.S.; Salama, A.A.; Abdel-Moneim, A.M.; Badri, F.B.; Thabet, H.A. Effects of Garlic and Lemon Essential Oils on Performance, Digestibility, Plasma Metabolite, and Intestinal Health in Broilers under Environmental Heat Stress. BMC Veter. Res. 2022, 18, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ghazanfari, S.; Mohammadi, Z.; Adib Moradi, M. Effects of Coriander Essential Oil on the Performance, Blood Characteristics, Intestinal Microbiota and Histological of Broilers. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. 2015, 17, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Ali, U.; Qaisrani, S.; Mahmud, A.; Hayat, Z.; Toyomizu, M. Effects of Supplemented Coriander, Ajwain, and Dill Seed Essential Oils on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Gut Health, Meat Quality, and Immune Status in Broilers. J. Poult. Sci. 2024, 61, 2024006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Almremdhy, H.A.A.E. The Effect of Coriander Oil in Drinking Water of Broiler Chickens in Growth Performance and Immune Response. Plant Arch. 2020, 20, 1999–2002. [Google Scholar]
  154. El-Deek, A.A.; Al-Harthi, M.A.; Osman, M.; Al-Jassas, F.; Nassar, R. Hot Pepper (Capsicum annum) as an Alternative to Oxytetracycline in Broiler Diets and Effects on Productive Traits, Meat Quality, Immunological Responses and Plasma Lipids. Eur. Poult. Sci. 2012, 76, 73–80. [Google Scholar]
  155. Liu, S.J.; Wang, J.; He, T.F.; Liu, H.S.; Piao, X.S. Effects of Natural Capsicum Extract on Growth Performance, Nutrient Utilization, Antioxidant Status, Immune Function, and Meat Quality in Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Mohammadi, Z.; Ghazanfari, S.; Moradi, M.A. Effect of Supplementing Clove Essential Oil to the Diet on Microflora Population, Intestinal Morphology, Blood Parameters and Performance of Broilers. Eur. Poult. Sci. (EPS) 2014, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Mohammadi, F. Effect of Different Levels of Clove (Syzygium aromaticum L.) Essential Oil on Growth Performance and Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress Biomarkers in Broilers under Heat Stress. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2021, 53, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Kishawy, A.T.; Al-Khalaifah, H.S.; Nada, H.S.; Roushdy, E.M.; Zaglool, A.W.; Ahmed Ismail, T.; Ibrahim, S.M.; Ibrahim, D. Black Pepper or Radish Seed Oils in a New Combination of Essential Oils Modulated Broiler Chickens’ Performance and Expression of Digestive Enzymes, Lipogenesis, Immunity, and Autophagy-Related Genes. Veter. Sci. 2022, 9, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Action mode of essential oils to improve health and production of broiler chikens.
Figure 1. Action mode of essential oils to improve health and production of broiler chikens.
Agriculture 14 01864 g001
Table 1. Main structural components of plants for some essential oils.
Table 1. Main structural components of plants for some essential oils.
Compound Part UsedPlantReferences
CarvacolAerialpartsOriganum vulgare[25]
Phenols, flavonoidsLeavesCitrus lemon[26]
Monoterpene LeavesRosemary officinalis[27]
Aromadendrene FruitEucalyptus globules[28]
Terpene
Monoterpene
Sesquiterpene
Immature flowers,
Stem, fruit
Eucalyptus oleosa[29]
CinnamaldehydeCassia leavesCinnamomum cassia[30]
Sesquiterpenes
Monoterpenes
RhizomeCurcuma spp.[31]
Trisulfid, DisulfideRhizomesAllium sativum[32]
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes
LeavesEugenia[22]
Monoterpene citral LeavesCymbopogon citratus[33]
CarvacolDried herbThymus sp., Thymbra sp.
Satureja sp., Lippia sp.
Coridothymus sp.
[34]
α-copaeno, α-muuroleno
δ-cadineno, 1s-calameneno
LeavesPhoebe bournei
[11]
Linalool, estragoleLeavesOcimum basilicum[5]
Linalool acetate, linalool LeavesLavandula angustifolia[35]
Table 2. Some plants whose essential oils (EOs) inhibit microbiological replication.
Table 2. Some plants whose essential oils (EOs) inhibit microbiological replication.
PlantsActivity AgainstMICReferences
Cymbopogon citratusAcinetobacter baumanii
Aeromonas veronii biogroup sobria
Candida albicans
Enterococcus faecalis
Escherichia coli
Klebsiella pneumoniae
0.03% v/v
0.12%
0.06%
0.12%
0.06%
0.25%
[53]
Origanum vulgarePseudomonas aeruginosa
Salmonella entericas
Serratia marcescens
Staphylococcus aureus
2.00% v/v
0.12%
0.25%
0.12%
Cymbopogon sp.Salmonella Heidelberg0.5% v/v[54]
Citrus japonicaBacillus subtilis
E. coli
Salmonella typhimurium
1.56 µL/mL
1.56
100
[55]
Citrus sinensisListeria monocytogenes
Staphylococcus aureus
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
10 mg/mL
10
10
[56]
Origanum vulgareEscherichia coli
Salmonella Indiana
Listeria innocua
0.9 mg/mL
0.9
0.9
[42]
Origanum spp.Bacillus subtilis0.15 mg/g[46]
Oreganum vulgare ssp. HirtumListeria monocytogenes,
Salmonella typhimurium
Escherichia coli O157:H7
4.5 mm a
10
10
[36]
Rosmarinus officinalisEscherichia coli
Salmonella indiana
Listeria innocua
0.9 mg/mL
0.9
0.9
[42]
Rosmarinus officinalisEschericia coli MDR
Shigella sonei
Salmonella typhi
Salmonella enteritidis
Staphylococcus aureus
S. epidermidis
18.6 b
19.4
18
26.6
17.2
18.2
[27]
Escherichia coli
Salmonella indiana
Listeria innocua
5 mL/mL
10 mL/mL
5 mL/mL
[57]
Phoebe bourneiEpidermophyton floccosum
Microsporum gypseum
74.2 µg/mL
32
[11]
Beilschmiedia madangBacillus subtilis
Staphylococcus aureus
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus fumigatus
125 µg/mL
125
62.5
62.5
[37]
Curcuma spp.Bacillus cereus
B. coagulans
B. subtilis
S. aureus
E. coli
Psudomona aeruginosa
100 ppm c
50
100
100
200
200
[58]
Eucalyptus spp.E. coli
S. aureus
P. aeruginosa
28.5% d
67.5
36.8
[40]
Lavandula angustifoliaSalmonella pullorum
S. enteritidis
S. typhimurium
Staphylococcus aureus
P. aeruginosa
Candida albicans
0.50% v/v
0.625
1.50
0.25
2.0
0.625
[59]
a Inhibition zone (mm); b Inhibition zone (mm)/(20% EO); c parts per million; d 50 ppm.
Table 3. Influence of essential oils (EO) molecules on broiler chicken production.
Table 3. Influence of essential oils (EO) molecules on broiler chicken production.
EO or Molecule,
Doses, and Duration
Active
Compound
Net Effect of EO
on Production
References
EO commercial product. (25 and 50 mg/kg) in diet. Trial of 35 dThymolNo effect on BWG, FI, or FCR[89]
EO commercial product (100 and 150 g/ton) in diet. Trial of 42 dCarvacrol, cinnamaldehyde eugenolNo effect on BWG, FI, or FCR[99]
EO commercial product (100 g/ton) in diet. Trial of 42 dCinnamaldehyde thymolNo effect on BWG FI or FCR; the EO.[100]
EO commercial product (25, 50, 100, and 150 mg/kg) in diet. Trial of 36 dCinnamaldehyde thymolEO improved BWG (11.5%) and FCR[101]
EO commercial product (50, 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg) in diet. Trial of 42 dThymol, carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, and carrier is dextrinEO had quadratic. improvement for ADG (6.4%) at 1 to 21d with EO. N other effects of EO on bird production[102]
Commercial product of EO plus organic acids (0, 0.05, and 0.075%) in diet. Trial of 35 dThymol and vanillin plus organic acidsEO had linear improvement for BWG (3.8%) and FCR (3.4%) with EO plus organic acids[103]
Commercial product of EO plus organic acids (150, 200, or 250 mg/kg) in diet. Trial of 70 dThymol and vanillin plus organic acidsEO had linear improvement for ADG (2.9%) and FCR (2.1%) at 1 to organic acids[104]
EO commercial product (0.075%) in diet. Trial of 42 dThyme extractEO improved BWG (13%) and FCR (22%)[105]
EO of thyme (150 or 300 mg/kg); EO of rosemary (100 or 200 mg/kg) in diet. Trial of 42 dThyme EO Rosemary EONo effect on BWG, FI, or FCR[106]
EO of thyme (0.5 and 1.0 g/kg) in diet. Trial of 42 dThyme EO (14.2 and 18.7%)EO improved ADG and FCR (5.7 and 7.8% at 0.5 and 1.0 g/kg)[107]
EO commercial product (0 or 100 mg/kg) in diet. From 9 to 35 d of age. Values for low and high ME in dietCarvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, and capsicum oleoresinEO improved ADG (2.1 and 2.7%) and FE (1.8% and 2.8%)[108]
EO commercial product (0, 60, 100, and 200 mg/kg) in diet. Trial of 42 dThymol and carvacrol improvement forEO had linear ADG (4%) and FE (6.3%)[90]
EO commercial product. (0 or 100 mg/kg) in diet. From 9 to 35 d of age.Carvacrol cinnamaldehyde capsicum oleoresin EO improved ADG (14.5%) and FE (9.8%)[109]
Commercial product of EO plus organic acids (0.30 g/kg) in diet. Trial of 42 dThymol plusEO improved FCR[92]
Commercial product of EO (300 mg/kg) in diet. Trial of 42 dCinnamaldehyde, carvacrol, thymol, eugenolEO only improved FCR in the starter phase[110]
Commercial product of EO (100 g/t) in diet. Trial of 42 dEucalyptus oil, carvacrol, cinnamylNo effect on BWG, FI, or FCR aldehyde, capsaicin[111]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salinas-Chavira, J.; Barrios-García, H.B. Essential Oils, Chemical Compounds, and Their Effects on the Gut Microorganisms and Broiler Chicken Production: Review. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1864. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111864

AMA Style

Salinas-Chavira J, Barrios-García HB. Essential Oils, Chemical Compounds, and Their Effects on the Gut Microorganisms and Broiler Chicken Production: Review. Agriculture. 2024; 14(11):1864. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111864

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salinas-Chavira, Jaime, and Hugo Brígido Barrios-García. 2024. "Essential Oils, Chemical Compounds, and Their Effects on the Gut Microorganisms and Broiler Chicken Production: Review" Agriculture 14, no. 11: 1864. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111864

APA Style

Salinas-Chavira, J., & Barrios-García, H. B. (2024). Essential Oils, Chemical Compounds, and Their Effects on the Gut Microorganisms and Broiler Chicken Production: Review. Agriculture, 14(11), 1864. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14111864

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop