Next Article in Journal
History and Evolution of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Determinants and Prediction of Antibiotic Resistance Phenotypes in Helicobacter pylori
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficacy of Integrating a Novel 16-Gene Biomarker Panel and Intelligence Classifiers for Differential Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(1), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8010054

Methods Used to Assess the 3D Accuracy of Dental Implant Positions in Computer-Guided Implant Placement: A Review

1
Department of Dentistry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Korea
2
Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
3
Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
4
Department of Periodontics, One-Stop Specialty Center, Seoul National University, Dental Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 28 November 2018 / Revised: 13 December 2018 / Accepted: 14 December 2018 / Published: 7 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Medicine)
Full-Text   |   PDF [5798 KB, uploaded 7 January 2019]   |  

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to examine various assessment methods in order to compare the accuracy between the virtually planned and clinically achieved implant positions. In this review, comparison methods using pre- and post-operative computed topography (CT) data and digital impressions for definitive prosthesis will be described. The method for the displacement and strain for quantification of the error will also be explored. The difference between the planned and the actual implant placement position in guided implant surgery is expressed as an error. Assessing the accuracy of implant-guided surgery can play an important role as positive feedback in order to reduce errors. All of the assessment methods have their own inevitable errors and require careful interpretation in evaluation. View Full-Text
Keywords: dental implants; accuracy; computer-guided surgery; implant position; displacement measurement dental implants; accuracy; computer-guided surgery; implant position; displacement measurement
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Pyo, S.-W.; Lim, Y.-J.; Koo, K.-T.; Lee, J. Methods Used to Assess the 3D Accuracy of Dental Implant Positions in Computer-Guided Implant Placement: A Review. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 54.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Clin. Med. EISSN 2077-0383 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top