Next Article in Journal
The Predictors of Incidental Durotomy in Patients Undergoing Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for the Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity
Next Article in Special Issue
Occlusal Caries Detection with Intraoral Scanners in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comparative Clinical Study
Previous Article in Journal
Retrospective Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Serial-Injection Triple Nerve Block Efficacy in Cementless Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Children’s Anxiety Level in Relation to a Dental Visit/Treatment and Their Parents’ Dental Fear
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Children and “Young” Adult Patients’ Quality of Life after Prosthetic Treatment of Disorders of the Craniofacial Region—A Retrospective Study

by
Elżbieta Wojtyńska
,
Bohdan Bączkowski
,
Mariusz Cierech
* and
Elżbieta Mierzwińska-Nastalska
Department of Prosthodontics, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(2), 339; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020339
Submission received: 1 December 2023 / Revised: 3 January 2024 / Accepted: 5 January 2024 / Published: 7 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Research in Pediatric Dentistry)

Abstract

Background: Prosthetic rehabilitation for children and juvenile patients with congenital or acquired craniofacial disorders is the area of activity of many clinicians and is a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for dentists. Methods: Studies were carried out on a group of 30 patients (10 female and 20 male) aged 2.5 to 30 years who were treated prosthetically due to congenital and acquired craniofacial disorders. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life using the CPQ 11-14 (Child Perception Questionnaire 11-14), OQLQ (Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire), and PIDAQ (Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire). Results: Before the prosthetic treatments, the mean values in the individual questionnaires were, respectively, CPQ 11-14—54 points; OQLQ—44.4 points; and PIDAQ—47.6 points. The following values were obtained after the treatments: CPQ 11-14—12.43 points; OQLQ—22.27 points; and PIDAQ—34.03 points. All obtained differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: The total numerical results obtained in all questionnaires decreased, which means that prosthetic rehabilitation had a positive impact on the assessment of the quality of life based on individual categories.
Keywords: quality of life; dental prosthesis; child preschool; child; adolescent; young adults quality of life; dental prosthesis; child preschool; child; adolescent; young adults

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wojtyńska, E.; Bączkowski, B.; Cierech, M.; Mierzwińska-Nastalska, E. Assessment of Children and “Young” Adult Patients’ Quality of Life after Prosthetic Treatment of Disorders of the Craniofacial Region—A Retrospective Study. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020339

AMA Style

Wojtyńska E, Bączkowski B, Cierech M, Mierzwińska-Nastalska E. Assessment of Children and “Young” Adult Patients’ Quality of Life after Prosthetic Treatment of Disorders of the Craniofacial Region—A Retrospective Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(2):339. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020339

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wojtyńska, Elżbieta, Bohdan Bączkowski, Mariusz Cierech, and Elżbieta Mierzwińska-Nastalska. 2024. "Assessment of Children and “Young” Adult Patients’ Quality of Life after Prosthetic Treatment of Disorders of the Craniofacial Region—A Retrospective Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 2: 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020339

APA Style

Wojtyńska, E., Bączkowski, B., Cierech, M., & Mierzwińska-Nastalska, E. (2024). Assessment of Children and “Young” Adult Patients’ Quality of Life after Prosthetic Treatment of Disorders of the Craniofacial Region—A Retrospective Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(2), 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020339

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop