Next Article in Journal
Human Amniotic Membrane for the Treatment of Cryptoglandular Anal Fistulas
Previous Article in Journal
Capsid Assembly Modulators as Antiviral Agents against HBV: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Perspectives
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/jcm11051351
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Congenital Zika Syndrome: Genetic Avenues for Diagnosis and Therapy, Possible Management and Long-Term Outcomes

by
Giuseppe Gullo
1,
Marco Scaglione
2,3,
Gaspare Cucinella
1,
Arianna Riva
4,
Davide Coldebella
5,
Anna Franca Cavaliere
6,
Fabrizio Signore
7,
Giovanni Buzzaccarini
5,
Giulia Spagnol
5,
Antonio Simone Laganà
8,
Marco Noventa
5,† and
Simona Zaami
9,*,†
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Villa Sofia Cervello Hospital IVF UNIT, University of Palermo, 90146 Palermo, Italy
2
School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
3
Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
4
Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Padova Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy
5
Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Gynaecological Clinic, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
6
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Santo Stefano Hospital, ULS Toscana Centro, 59100 Rome, Italy
7
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sant’Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy
8
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filippo Del Ponte” Hospital, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
9
Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(5), 1351; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051351
Submission received: 27 January 2022 / Revised: 21 February 2022 / Accepted: 25 February 2022 / Published: 1 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Zika virus (ZIKV) was discovered in Uganda in 1947 and was originally isolated only in Africa and Asia. After a spike of microcephaly cases in Brazil, research has closely focused on different aspects of congenital ZIKV infection. In this review, we evaluated many aspects of the disease in order to build its natural history, with a focus on the long-term clinical and neuro-radiological outcomes in children. The authors have conducted a wide-ranging search spanning the 2012–2021 period from databases PubMed, PubMed Central, Web of Science, Medline, Scopus. Different sections reflect different points of congenital ZIKV infection syndrome: pathogenesis, prenatal diagnosis, clinical signs, neuroimaging and long-term developmental outcomes. It emerged that pathogenesis has not been fully clarified and that the clinical signs are not only limited to microcephaly. Given the current absence of treatments, we proposed schemes to optimize diagnostic protocols in endemic countries. It is essential to know the key aspects of this disease to guarantee early diagnosis, even in less severe cases, and an adequate management of the main chronic problems. Considering the relatively recent discovery of this congenital infectious syndrome, further studies and updated long-term follow-up are needed to further improve management strategies for this disease.

1. Introduction

ZIKV is a single-stranded ribonucleic acid (RNA) flavivirus transmitted by arthropod vectors, in particular, Aedes aegypti (or yellow fever mosquito, also responsible for the transmission of Dengue and Chikungunya) and Aedes albopictus (or Asian tiger mosquito, also responsible for the transmission of Chikungunya and West Nile virus). The virus replicates in the insect’s epithelial cells and, eventually, in the salivary glands. ZIKV infection used to be considered a tropical disease, but global interest has increased since 2015 due to an epidemic of neonatal microcephaly in Brazil. The virus has been found capable of crossing the placenta in all gestational periods, but mainly in the first trimester. The infection has also been shown to be transmissible sexually and through transfusions [1]. Another important aspect is that the vector Aedes aegypti varies seasonally in the United States [2]. No treatment or vaccine as yet exists for ZIKV. Symptomatic infection is characterized by low-grade fever, maculopapular rash, arthralgia, and conjunctivitis (some cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome have also been reported in adults); although the symptoms may last for about 5–7 days, 80% of cases are asymptomatic, which greatly complicates the diagnosis in pregnancy. Congenital ZIKV infection may accurately be viewed as a newcomer of the TORCH complex, an acronym that stands for toxoplasmosis, others (syphilis, varicella-zoster, parvovirus B19), rubella, cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpesvirus (HSV), given the characteristics it shares with such well-known pregnancy diseases with mild symptoms in the mother, vertical transmission, severe anomalies in the new-born and maternal therapy, which often fails to improve the prognosis [3]. Although it is a relatively new disease, many national and international associations have already drawn up guidelines for ZIKV infection in pregnancy [4], stressing the need for wide-ranging interventions via family-based support programmes aimed at addressing the special needs of children with CZS neurodevelopmental disability in low- and middle-income countries [5,6], as well as the socioeconomic struggles and psychological impact burdening their families [7,8]. All such issues have been further worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic. As the SARS-CoV-2 curve of infections grew at the height of the pandemic, so did the strain caused by ZIKV on public health facilities in countries where CZS already posed a threat long before the current pandemic [9,10]. The two diseases do bear similarities in terms of clinical manifestations, particularly in the early stages; such an ambiguity can cause delays in diagnosis and treatment interventions, thus, fostering the spread of infection and raising the risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Delays in diagnosis and treatment due to symptoms similar to COVID-19 and other infectious diseases such as Dengue and typhoid fever have also been reported. In India and Pakistan [11,12], the similarity between COVID-19 symptoms and other diseases has reportedly caused misdiagnosis and possible underreporting. To make matters worse, a diversion of resources away from entomological control services, in order to tackle COVID-19, can cause a higher rate of infections from other arboviruses (primarily Dengue and Chikungunya) spread by the same vector [13].

2. Materials and Methods

The authors have conducted a wide-ranging search spanning the 2012–2021 period from databases PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, and Scopus using search strings consisting of keywords such as Zika, pathogenesis, epigenetics, and microcephaly. Among these papers, we found review/meta-analysis, cohort/retrospective cohort studies (focused on long-term follow-up of children’s health) and case-report/case series (reporting the autopsy findings of fetuses that died in utero or shortly after birth). The results and evidence found in the various studies were schematized and both points of agreement and divergence were discussed. The various sections are designed to comprehensively describe the ZIKV congenital infection syndrome. This schematization was used to discuss and propose possible management strategies.

3. Pathogenesis

ZIKV has a unique ability among flaviviruses to cross the placental barrier (for example, Dengue virus does not have the same capacity) [14]. Hypothesized transmission routes are: direct infection of the syncytiotrophoblast layer, passage through ruptures in the syncytiotrophoblast layer, crossing of the syncytiotrophoblast layer through non-replicative routes (for example antibody-mediated transcytosis), infection of extravillous trophoblast or other more permissive placental cells (for example, cell of the maternal microvasculature and/or decidua), transmission to the fetus and/or villous core through maternal cells (most probably of immune origin), ascending vaginal infection [15]. The placental damage caused by the virus is related to local inflammation and/or metabolic alterations with mitochondrial dysfunction and loss of function of membrane lipids; the latter seem to rearrange themselves and to support viral replication [16]. ZIKV can reportedly upregulate the innate immune response of the decidua (an aspect in common with CMV), while some findings also show that the mechanism of damage of the maternal-fetal interface is not inflammation-mediated, but only related to the upregulation of apoptosis in placental cells [17]. Once the ZIKV has reached the fetal bloodstream, given its marked neurotropism, the damage is mainly neuronal. The pathogenetic mechanism has been hypothesized to be inflammatory initially for toxoplasma, CMV and rubella, the three most studied etiological agents that cause microcephaly by congenital infection [18]. Studies have also shown how the marked neurotropism of the virus may depend on a specific receptor on neural progenitor cells. In murine animal models, ZIKV infection has, at times, exhibited interference with cell cycle progression; neuronal cells may, therefore, become unable to migrate in the genesis of the telencephalon; for this reason, neurospheres and brain organoids cannot develop [19]. Reportedly, 1 to 42% of embryos or fetuses that are exposed to ZIKV infection in utero develop congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) [20]. Still, it is worth noting that the discovery of the viral teratogenic potential associated with ZIKV is relatively recent; hence, the degree of susceptibility and the mechanisms involved in the adverse effects on embryos and developing fetuses exposed to it are still not fully understood [21]. It is, therefore, essential to evaluate how susceptibility to ZIKV teratogenesis can be affected by environmental and genetic factors (e.g., the inflammatory process of response to ZIKV as risk or protective factors for CZS and the involvement of genetic variants in such dynamics).

4. Genetic Risk Factors

Technological advances are increasingly contributing to clarifying the key factors that affect and shape the dynamics of emerging infections, including ZIKV. Techniques such as genome-wide association studies [22], high-throughput sequencing [23] and screening based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) [24,25] has made it possible to identify human single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which may substantially affect the outcome of infectious diseases [26]. Polymorphisms in NOS2 and TNF genes have been reported to play a role in the development of CZS, with a higher risk in the first trimester, and of severe microcephaly. Specifically, genes closely linked to immune and inflammatory response, such as VEGFA, PTGS2, NOS3, TNF, and NOS2, with functional genetic variants, can exhibit different allelic, genotypic, and haplotypic frequencies in children with CZS [27]. A higher prevalence of the rs2297518 allele A in the NOS2 gene has also been observed in children with CZS. Significantly, the iNOS protein activity is somehow influenced by functional polymorphism NOS2 rs2297518. Enhanced protein activity and a higher level of nitric oxide (NO) are also presumably associated with A allele [28,29]. Neurogenesis and neurodevelopment have, in turn, been found to be substantially influenced by NO, whose dysregulation may impact the progression of various neurodevelopmental, neurobehavioral, and neurodegenerative disorders [30]. The rate of progression and development could be influenced by NO dysregulation linked to the individual response to ZIKV infection and by the patient’s genotype, even to the point of bringing about a congenital anomaly. Furthermore, CZS pathogenesis may be affected by single nucleotide variants: rs2076469 at the DISP3 gene and other rare variants in the IL12RB2 gene, due to their possible protective value and connection with neuronal proliferation and differentiation. Both phenotypes have been found altered in CZS patients, which may impact early immune-response to ZIKV infection [31,32,33]. Recent findings also reflect how two genes prominently involved in the regulation of bone development and cell–cell adhesion, FGFR3 and ITGB4, are upregulated in the brains of CZS patients [34].

5. Reverse Genetics and Recombinant ZIKV

The complex ways in which the pathology of ZIKV infection is affected by genetic traits will be instrumental in laying out therapeutic pathways and enhancing surveillance and prevention capabilities to counter the spread of ZIKV [35]. Reverse genetic strategies, either in vitro or in vivo, may constitute a valuable approach through which research will gain a more thorough understanding as to ZIKV’s biology and pathogenesis. The creation of recombinant viruses with specific mutations through the manipulation of the ZIKV genome has enabled researchers to shed a light on the function of viral proteins, the interactions involved between ZIKV and its host, and associated disease [36]. Research strategies harnessing reverse genetics have also proven valuable in the development of new effective prevention and control measures [37,38]. The bioengineering of replicating-competent recombinant ZIKV, which can be used to modify the ZIKV genomic RNA at the DNA level and express reporter genes, has, in fact, shown remarkable potential for the development of anti-viral therapeutic options to treat ZIKV infection [39,40], provided that the instability commonly linked to the construction of full-length cDNA clones can be overcome [41,42]. New research avenues are currently being pursued, relying on novel methods for more efficient and easier infectious clone construction, for instance, through the use of homologous recombination clones during plasmid construction [43].

6. Prenatal Diagnosis

The gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of ZIKV infection is the polymerase chain reaction essay (PCR) on amniotic fluid. Virus-specific IgM antibodies may be detected 3 days after the onset of symptoms. The serology findings can determine false positives due to cross-reaction with other flaviviruses (like West Nile virus, Dengue and yellow fever). After birth, the viral genome is detectable in saliva, breast milk, urine, and serum within several days after delivery; these data support the possible perinatal transmission of the infection [1].
Another limitation for prenatal diagnosis of the infection is persistent viremia and viruria in pregnancy, even weeks and months after primary exposure [44]. In the case of microcephaly, defined head circumference <2SDS is detectable by ultrasound starting from the second trimester, whereas ZIKV infection occurs typically in the first trimester. Other ultrasound signs suggestive of infection include ventriculomegaly, brain calcifications and posterior fossa destructive lesions; these findings are not found in other congenital infections [45]. According to some studies, another typical sign is disproportion in fetal growth, such as an unusual femur sparing growth restriction [46]. Indicators for diagnosis of ZIKV infection in the first trimester have been summarized in Table 1.

7. Clinical Signs

The distinctive features of the congenital ZIKV syndrome in the new-born are the following: severe microcephaly with partially collapsed skull, redundant scalp skin, early closure of the fontanelles, macular scarring and focal pigmentary retinal mottling, congenital contractures of one or more joints (similar to arthrogryposis, very rare in other congenital infections) and extrapyramidal motor symptoms with marked hypertonia. According to some authors, microcephaly may develop in new-borns with a normal head circumference at birth [1,47]. In severe cases, placental insufficiency caused by infection can lead to fetal growth restriction and, sometimes, even to fetal demise [6,48].

8. Neuroimaging

Neuroimaging with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MRI) has found calcifications of the cortico-medullary junction with band distribution, more frequently in the basal ganglia and less commonly in the thalamus. Other alterations include cysts, mainly in the occipital area, delayed myelination and ventriculomegaly (Table 2). The latter, if severe, may require ventricular-peritoneal shunt surgery. Some of the alterations mentioned above may be present even in children with normal head circumference [1].
In congenital ZIKV infection, the whole development of the brain is compromised, with a reduction in cortical gyrification, cerebellar hypoplasia, and hypo/dysmyelination of the white matter in almost all affected subjects. These pathologic alterations are visible both with CT performed after birth and with fetal MRI [49].
Vasco Aragao et al. and Pires et al. have reported that the calcifications of the junction between the cortical area and the white matter are the most frequent finding, followed by alterations of the gyrification, such as pachygyria and micropolygyria, especially in the frontal lobes; hypoplasia of the corpus callosum, ventriculomegaly, hypoplasia of the cerebellum and brainstem (mainly of the pons) or global delay of myelination are less frequent [50,51]. Calcifications of the cortico-medullary junction, although described by most authors, should not be considered among the major criteria to define the prognosis since they tend to disappear with age in most children (92–95%). Therefore, this change is not accompanied by clinical improvement; the absence of calcifications does not exclude the diagnosis of the disease [52]. The pathological definition of the disease has proven particularly challenging, as mild and/or unspecific placental findings in ZIKV-affected pregnancies have been reported, e.g., chronic placentitis, increased Hofbauer cells, chronic villitis, variable perivillous fibrin and mononuclear cells, and villous immaturity, among others [53]. Assessing the risks and severity of ZIKV infection has proven challenging, mostly because of the dearth of specific diagnostic reagents and of a still incomplete understanding as to its pathogenic patterns, mechanisms and molecular virology [54,55].
Comparing MRI pathological changes of ZIKV infection with those of CMV infection, (Table 3), the spectrum of malformations appears to be very similar, yet more severe [56].

9. Long-Term Developmental Outcomes

The impact of congenital Zika virus infection on the brain of children has been investigated by several authors through autopsy findings in fetuses (stillbirths or interrupted pregnancy) and children who died shortly after birth. Mlakar et al., in a fetal autopsy, observed complete agyria, calcifications of the junction between the cortex and white matter, hydrocephalus and focal inflammation loci. These alterations are consistent with the neuroimaging described in the previous paragraph. Molecular biology investigations with RT-PCR on these tissues led to isolation of the viral genome [57].
Brasil Martines et al. analyzed brain tissue of children who died after birth with microcephaly and severe arthrogryposis and placental tissues of first trimester miscarriages. In both cases, it was possible to detect viral antigens and viral genome with RT-PCR technique [58].
In children with minor morphological damage, the main neurological problems are infantile cerebral palsy, epilepsy (the extensive damage caused by the Zika virus on the cortical structures of patients can lead to higher cumulative incidence of epilepsy episodes of higher severity, in addition to a worse response to anti-epileptic treatment [59]) and neurodevelopmental repercussions [60,61]. Wheeler et al., in a 30-months follow-up study of 121 children affected by congenital ZIKV infection, reported global developmental delay in almost all specific domains (in particular, cognition, fine motor skills and expressive language). According to these authors, the most indicative predictor of future developmental outcome is head circumference at birth [62]. In another study of 444 children with 12-month follow-up after birth, about 8 out of 10 children exposed to prenatal infection, but without microcephaly, were found to be healthy. Bilateral spastic infantile cerebral palsy has been reported in children with congenital microcephaly. The general movement assessment (GMA) at 3 months of life proved to be an accurate diagnostic test that should be introduced into the diagnostic routine [63]. Bertolli et al. carried out a 24-months follow-up of children with congenital infection ascertained by laboratory and ultrasound anthropometric criteria before birth (or only one of the two). Neurological and psychomotor outcomes of children with positivity for both criteria were worse, while less severe outcomes were reported in children with congenital infection ascertained solely by the laboratory criterion. An accurate monitoring of neurological development is necessary even when prenatal infection is uncertain [64]. Other issus observed in children affected by congenital ZIKV infection are failure to thrive, cardiac malformations, excess nuchal skin, auditory abnormalities and eye abnormalities. Even children with normal head circumference may develop neurological problems, such as hyperreflexia, abnormal tone, congenital neuromotor signs and feeding difficulties. In addition, over half of children with severe forms (54%) develop epilepsy [65,66]. Table 4 summarizes the possible clinical signs of congenital ZIKV syndrome. The spectrum of signs can vary widely; they are not always present concomitantly.

10. Conclusions

This review set out to analyze the main features of congenital ZIKV syndrome, including the pathogenesis of placental and neuronal damage, the methods of prenatal diagnosis, the clinical diagnosis of affected children, neuroimaging and long-term developmental outcomes. Given the large percentage of asymptomatic infections in pregnant women, screening seems to be the only method that really guarantees an early diagnosis and serology, with IgM detection. It should, therefore, be proposed to all pregnant women in endemic areas. Since this test is easily burdened by false positives in the endemic areas, it should be associated with obstetric ultrasound to detect specific markers already in the first trimester of pregnancy. Everyone should be aware that microcephaly can only be seen in the second trimester ultrasound and that some of the affected children will not develop microcephaly. In the case of strong clinical suspicion, PCR on amniotic fluid ought to be carried out (Figure 1).
Long-term outcomes of affected children are another very important point of interest. The majority of children who develop microcephaly have an overall developmental delay and, often, severe cerebral palsy. Conversely, among children with normal head circumference, most have a regular pattern of development. In these cases, with established prenatal exposure, even in the absence of microcephaly, it is important to monitor regular development with accurate tests such as GMA. Obviously, GMA, in addition to suggestive clinical signs, can also help to assess cases that have eluded prenatal diagnosis (or doubtful cases due to isolated laboratory positivity). Knowledge of the neuroradiological markers of infection is certainly helpful in cases of clinical suspicion. Children diagnosed with neurodevelopmental issues should start specific rehabilitation protocols as soon as possible. Furthermore, it is essential to investigate epilepsy, possibly with serial electroencephalographic insights and monitoring (Figure 2).
In conclusion, shedding light on key aspects of this disease will allow for early diagnosis, even in less severe cases, and adequate management of chronic issues. Given the relatively recent discovery of this congenital infection syndrome, further studies, with updated long-term follow-up of affected children are needed to further improve management strategies.

Author Contributions

G.G., M.S. and S.Z. project conception, data analysis and manuscript writing; D.C., G.B. and S.Z. manuscript writing and editing; G.C., A.R. and A.F.C. data collection; M.N., G.S., F.S., A.S.L. and S.Z. manuscript writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. De Vries, L.S. Viral Infections and the Neonatal Brain. Semin. Pediatr. Neurol. 2019, 32, 100769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schirmer, D.A.; Kawwass, J.F. Epidemiology, Virology, and Pathogenesis of the Zika Virus: From Neglected Tropical Disease to a Focal Point of International Attention. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2016, 34, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mehrjardi, M.Z. Is Zika Virus an Emerging TORCH Agent? An Invited Commentary. Virology 2017, 8, 1178122X17708993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eloundou, S.N.; Sheffield, J.S. Prenatal Effects of Zika Virus and Management of the Pregnant Woman. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2016, 34, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Duttine, A.; Smythe, T.; Ribiero Calheiro de Sá, M.; Ferrite, S.; Zuurmond, M.; Moreira, M.E.; Collins, A.; Milner, K.; Kuper, H. Congenital Zika Syndrome—Assessing the Need for a Family Support Programme in Brazil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zuurmond, M.; Nyante, G.; Baltussen, M.; Seeley, J.; Abanga, J.; Shakespeare, T.; Collumbien, M.; Bernays, S. A Support Programme for Caregivers of Children with Disabilities in Ghana: Understanding the Impact on the Wellbeing of Caregivers. Child Care Health Dev. 2019, 45, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kuper, H.; Lyra, T.M.; Moreira, M.E.L.; de Albuquerque, M.D.S.V.; de Araújo, T.V.B.; Fernandes, S.; Jofre-Bonet, M.; Larson, H.; Lopes de Melo, A.P.; Mendes, C.H.F.; et al. Social and Economic Impacts of Congenital Zika Syndrome in Brazil: Study Protocol and Rationale for a Mixed-Methods Study. Wellcome Open Res. 2019, 3, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kuper, H.; Lopes Moreira, M.E.; Barreto de Araújo, T.V.; Valongueiro, S.; Fernandes, S.; Pinto, M.; Lyra, T.M. The Association of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress with Caring for a Child with Congenital Zika Syndrome in Brazil; Results of a Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dos Santos Costa, A.C.; Hasan, M.M.; Xenophontos, E.; Mohanan, P.; Bassey, E.E.; Hashim, H.T.; Ahmad, S.; Essar, M.Y. COVID-19 and Zika: An Emerging Dilemma for Brazil. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 4124–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pergolizzi, J.; LeQuang, J.A.; Umeda-Raffa, S.; Fleischer, C.; Pergolizzi, J.; Pergolizzi, C.; Raffa, R.B. The Zika Virus: Lurking behind the COVID-19 Pandemic? J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2021, 46, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Parasa, S.; Desai, M.; Thoguluva Chandrasekar, V.; Patel, H.K.; Kennedy, K.F.; Roesch, T.; Spadaccini, M.; Colombo, M.; Gabbiadini, R.; Artifon, E.L.A.; et al. Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Fecal Viral Shedding in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2011335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Phadke, R.; Mohan, A.; Çavdaroğlu, S.; Dapke, K.; dos Santos Costa, A.C.; Riaz, M.M.A.; Hashim, H.T.; Essar, M.Y.; Ahmad, S. Dengue amidst COVID-19 in India: The Mystery of Plummeting Cases. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 4120–4121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lokida, D.; Lukman, N.; Salim, G.; Butar-Butar, D.P.; Kosasih, H.; Wulan, W.N.; Naysilla, A.M.; Djajady, Y.; Sari, R.A.; Arlinda, D.; et al. Diagnosis of COVID-19 in a Dengue-Endemic Area. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020, 103, 1220–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pacheco, O.; Beltrán, M.; Nelson, C.A.; Valencia, D.; Tolosa, N.; Farr, S.L.; Padilla, A.V.; Tong, V.T.; Cuevas, E.L.; Espinosa-Bode, A.; et al. Zika Virus Disease in Colombia—Preliminary Report. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Coyne, C.B.; Lazear, H.M. Zika Virus—Reigniting the TORCH. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Chen, Q.; Gouilly, J.; Ferrat, Y.J.; Espino, A.; Glaziou, Q.; Cartron, G.; El Costa, H.; Al-Daccak, R.; Jabrane-Ferrat, N. Metabolic Reprogramming by Zika Virus Provokes Inflammation in Human Placenta. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Weisblum, Y.; Oiknine-Djian, E.; Vorontsov, O.M.; Haimov-Kochman, R.; Zakay-Rones, Z.; Meir, K.; Shveiky, D.; Elgavish, S.; Nevo, Y.; Roseman, M.; et al. Zika Virus Infects Early- and Midgestation Human Maternal Decidual Tissues, Inducing Distinct Innate Tissue Responses in the Maternal-Fetal Interface. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e01905-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Frenkel, L.D.; Gomez, F.; Sabahi, F. The Pathogenesis of Microcephaly Resulting from Congenital Infections: Why Is My Baby’s Head so Small? Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 37, 209–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, K.; Wang, L.; Yu, D.; Huang, H.; Ji, H.; Mo, X. Molecular and Cellular Insights into Zika Virus-Related Neuropathies. J. Neurovirol. 2017, 23, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nithiyanantham, S.F.; Badawi, A. Maternal Infection with Zika Virus and Prevalence of Congenital Disorders in Infants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Can. J. Public Health 2019, 110, 638–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gomes, J.A.; Sgarioni, E.; Boquett, J.A.; Terças-Trettel, A.C.P.; da Silva, J.H.; Ribeiro, B.F.R.; Galera, M.F.; de Oliveira, T.M.; Carvalho de Andrade, M.D.F.; Carvalho, I.F.; et al. Association between Genetic Variants in NOS2 and TNF Genes with Congenital Zika Syndrome and Severe Microcephaly. Viruses 2021, 13, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, G.; Poulsen, M.; Fenyvuesvolgyi, C.; Yashiroda, Y.; Yoshida, M.; Simard, J.M.; Gallo, R.C.; Zhao, R.Y. Characterization of Cytopathic Factors through Genome-Wide Analysis of the Zika Viral Proteins in Fission Yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E376–E385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zhang, J.-W.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Ma, L.; Hua, R.-H.; Bu, Z.-G. Generation of A Stable GFP-Reporter Zika Virus System for High-Throughput Screening of Zika Virus Inhibitors. Virol. Sin. 2021, 36, 476–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, Y.; Muffat, J.; Omer Javed, A.; Keys, H.R.; Lungjangwa, T.; Bosch, I.; Khan, M.; Virgilio, M.C.; Gehrke, L.; Sabatini, D.M.; et al. Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen for Zika Virus Resistance in Human Neural Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 9527–9532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Piergentili, R.; Del Rio, A.; Signore, F.; Umani Ronchi, F.; Marinelli, E.; Zaami, S. CRISPR-Cas and Its Wide-Ranging Applications: From Human Genome Editing to Environmental Implications, Technical Limitations, Hazards and Bioethical Issues. Cells 2021, 10, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ferraris, P.; Wichit, S.; Cordel, N.; Missé, D. Human Host Genetics and Susceptibility to ZIKV Infection. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2021, 95, 105066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Borda, V.; da Silva Francisco Junior, R.; Carvalho, J.B.; Morais, G.L.; Duque Rossi, Á.; Pezzuto, P.; Azevedo, G.S.; Schamber-Reis, B.L.; Portari, E.A.; Melo, A.; et al. Whole-Exome Sequencing Reveals Insights into Genetic Susceptibility to Congenital Zika Syndrome. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0009507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Garry, P.S.; Ezra, M.; Rowland, M.J.; Westbrook, J.; Pattinson, K.T.S. The Role of the Nitric Oxide Pathway in Brain Injury and Its Treatment—From Bench to Bedside. Exp. Neurol. 2015, 263, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Dhillon, S.S.; Mastropaolo, L.A.; Murchie, R.; Griffiths, C.; Thöni, C.; Elkadri, A.; Xu, W.; Mack, A.; Walters, T.; Guo, C.; et al. Higher Activity of the Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Contributes to Very Early Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2014, 5, e46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tripathi, M.K.; Kartawy, M.; Amal, H. The Role of Nitric Oxide in Brain Disorders: Autism Spectrum Disorder and Other Psychiatric, Neurological, and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Redox Biol. 2020, 34, 101567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hung, S.-J.; Huang, S.-W. Contributions of Genetic Evolution to Zika Virus Emergence. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 655065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Carbaugh, D.L.; Zhou, S.; Sanders, W.; Moorman, N.J.; Swanstrom, R.; Lazear, H.M. Two Genetic Differences between Closely Related Zika Virus Strains Determine Pathogenic Outcome in Mice. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e00618-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Haddow, A.D.; Schuh, A.J.; Yasuda, C.Y.; Kasper, M.R.; Heang, V.; Huy, R.; Guzman, H.; Tesh, R.B.; Weaver, S.C. Genetic Characterization of Zika Virus Strains: Geographic Expansion of the Asian Lineage. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Aguiar, R.S.; Pohl, F.; Morais, G.L.; Nogueira, F.C.S.; Carvalho, J.B.; Guida, L.; Arge, L.W.P.; Melo, A.; Moreira, M.E.L.; Cunha, D.P.; et al. Molecular Alterations in the Extracellular Matrix in the Brains of Newborns with Congenital Zika Syndrome. Sci. Signal. 2020, 13, eaay6736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Strottmann, D.M.; Zanluca, C.; Mosimann, A.L.P.; Koishi, A.C.; Auwerter, N.C.; Faoro, H.; Cataneo, A.H.D.; Kuczera, D.; Wowk, P.F.; Bordignon, J.; et al. Genetic and Biological Characterisation of Zika Virus Isolates from Different Brazilian Regions. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2019, 114, e190150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Du, S.; Shan, C.; Nie, K.; Zhang, R.; Li, X.-F.; Zhang, R.; Wang, T.; Qin, C.-F.; et al. Evolutionary Enhancement of Zika Virus Infectivity in Aedes Aegypti Mosquitoes. Nature 2017, 545, 482–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Yang, Y.; Shan, C.; Zou, J.; Muruato, A.E.; Bruno, D.N.; de Almeida Medeiros Daniele, B.; Vasconcelos, P.F.C.; Rossi, S.L.; Weaver, S.C.; Xie, X.; et al. A CDNA Clone-Launched Platform for High-Yield Production of Inactivated Zika Vaccine. EBioMedicine 2017, 17, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lu, C.-Y.; Lin, C.-S.; Lai, H.-C.; Yu, Y.-W.; Liao, C.-Y.; Su, W.-C.; Ko, B.-H.; Chang, Y.-S.; Huang, S.-H.; Lin, C.-W. The Rescue and Characterization of Recombinant, Microcephaly-Associated Zika Viruses as Single-Round Infectious Particles. Viruses 2019, 11, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kümmerer, B.M. Establishment and Application of Flavivirus Replicons. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1062, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Komoto, S.; Fukuda, S.; Murata, T.; Taniguchi, K. Human Rotavirus Reverse Genetics Systems to Study Viral Replication and Pathogenesis. Viruses 2021, 13, 1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gao, J.; Chen, J.; Lu, W.; Cai, J.; Shi, L.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, B. Construction of an Infectious Clone of Zika Virus Stably Expressing an EGFP Marker in a Eukaryotic Expression System. Virol. J. 2021, 18, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ávila-Pérez, G.; Nogales, A.; Martín, V.; Almazán, F.; Martínez-Sobrido, L. Reverse Genetic Approaches for the Generation of Recombinant Zika Virus. Viruses 2018, 10, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Qin, Z.; Chen, Y.; Yu, J.; He, X.; Liu, X.; Zhu, L.; Wu, Q.; Wan, C.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, W. Rapid Construction of an Infectious Clone of the Zika Virus, Strain ZKC2. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 752578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Eppes, C.; Rac, M.; Dunn, J.; Versalovic, J.; Murray, K.O.; Suter, M.A.; Sanz Cortes, M.; Espinoza, J.; Seferovic, M.D.; Lee, W.; et al. Testing for Zika Virus Infection in Pregnancy: Key Concepts to Deal with an Emerging Epidemic. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 216, 209–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Sarno, M.; Aquino, M.; Pimentel, K.; Cabral, R.; Costa, G.; Bastos, F.; Brites, C. Progressive Lesions of Central Nervous System in Microcephalic Fetuses with Suspected Congenital Zika Virus Syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 50, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Walker, C.L.; Little, M.-T.E.; Roby, J.A.; Armistead, B.; Gale, M.; Rajagopal, L.; Nelson, B.R.; Ehinger, N.; Mason, B.; Nayeri, U.; et al. Zika Virus and the Nonmicrocephalic Fetus: Why We Should Still Worry. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 220, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rasmussen, S.A.; Meaney-Delman, D.M.; Petersen, L.R.; Jamieson, D.J. Studying the Effects of Emerging Infections on the Fetus: Experience with West Nile and Zika Viruses. Birth Defects Res. 2017, 109, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Freitas, D.A.; Souza-Santos, R.; Carvalho, L.M.A.; Barros, W.B.; Neves, L.M.; Brasil, P.; Wakimoto, M.D. Congenital Zika Syndrome: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0242367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Araujo Júnior, E.; Carvalho, F.H.C.; Tonni, G.; Werner, H. Prenatal Imaging Findings in Fetal Zika Virus Infection. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 29, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. de Fatima Vasco Aragao, M.; van der Linden, V.; Brainer-Lima, A.M.; Coeli, R.R.; Rocha, M.A.; Sobral da Silva, P.; Durce Costa Gomes de Carvalho, M.; van der Linden, A.; Cesario de Holanda, A.; Valenca, M.M. Clinical Features and Neuroimaging (CT and MRI) Findings in Presumed Zika Virus Related Congenital Infection and Microcephaly: Retrospective Case Series Study. BMJ 2016, 353, i1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Pires, P.; Jungmann, P.; Galvão, J.M.; Hazin, A.; Menezes, L.; Ximenes, R.; Tonni, G.; Araujo Júnior, E. Neuroimaging Findings Associated with Congenital Zika Virus Syndrome: Case Series at the Time of First Epidemic Outbreak in Pernambuco State, Brazil. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2018, 34, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Da Lima Petribu, N.C.; Aragao, M.D.F.V.; van der Linden, V.; Parizel, P.; Jungmann, P.; Araújo, L.; Abath, M.; Fernandes, A.; Brainer-Lima, A.; Holanda, A.; et al. Follow-up Brain Imaging of 37 Children with Congenital Zika Syndrome: Case Series Study. BMJ 2017, 359, j4188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Liang, B.; Guida, J.P.; Costa, M.L.; Mysorekar, I.U. Host and Viral Mechanisms of Congenital Zika Syndrome. Virulence 2019, 10, 768–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Pierson, T.C.; Diamond, M.S. The Emergence of Zika Virus and Its New Clinical Syndromes. Nature 2018, 560, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lazear, H.M.; Diamond, M.S. Zika Virus: New Clinical Syndromes and Its Emergence in the Western Hemisphere. J. Virol. 2016, 90, 4864–4875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Diogo, M.C.; Glatter, S.; Binder, J.; Kiss, H.; Prayer, D. The MRI Spectrum of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection. Prenat. Diagn. 2020, 40, 110–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Mlakar, J.; Korva, M.; Tul, N.; Popović, M.; Poljšak-Prijatelj, M.; Mraz, J.; Kolenc, M.; Resman Rus, K.; Vesnaver Vipotnik, T.; Fabjan Vodušek, V.; et al. Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 951–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Martines, R.B.; Bhatnagar, J.; de Oliveira Ramos, A.M.; Davi, H.P.F.; Iglezias, S.D.; Kanamura, C.T.; Keating, M.K.; Hale, G.; Silva-Flannery, L.; Muehlenbachs, A.; et al. Pathology of Congenital Zika Syndrome in Brazil: A Case Series. Lancet 2016, 388, 898–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Maia, C.Q.; Lima, W.G.; Nizer, W.S.D.C.; Ferreira, J.M.S. Epilepsy in Children with Congenital Zika Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Epilepsia 2021, 62, 1193–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ostrander, B.; Bale, J.F. Congenital and Perinatal Infections. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2019, 162, 133–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Gordon-Lipkin, E.; Peacock, G. The Spectrum of Developmental Disability with Zika Exposure: What Is Known, What Is Unknown, and Implications for Clinicians. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 2019, 40, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wheeler, A.C.; Toth, D.; Ridenour, T.; Lima Nóbrega, L.; Borba Firmino, R.; Marques da Silva, C.; Carvalho, P.; Marques, D.; Okoniewski, K.; Ventura, L.O.; et al. Developmental Outcomes Among Young Children With Congenital Zika Syndrome in Brazil. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e204096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Einspieler, C.; Utsch, F.; Brasil, P.; Panvequio Aizawa, C.Y.; Peyton, C.; Hydee Hasue, R.; Françoso Genovesi, F.; Damasceno, L.; Moreira, M.E.; Adachi, K.; et al. Association of Infants Exposed to Prenatal Zika Virus Infection With Their Clinical, Neurologic, and Developmental Status Evaluated via the General Movement Assessment Tool. JAMA Netw. Open 2019, 2, e187235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Bertolli, J.; Attell, J.E.; Rose, C.; Moore, C.A.; Melo, F.; Staples, J.E.; Kotzky, K.; Krishna, N.; Satterfield-Nash, A.; Pereira, I.O.; et al. Functional Outcomes among a Cohort of Children in Northeastern Brazil Meeting Criteria for Follow-Up of Congenital Zika Virus Infection. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020, 102, 955–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cranston, J.S.; Tiene, S.F.; Nielsen-Saines, K.; Vasconcelos, Z.; Pone, M.V.; Pone, S.; Zin, A.; Salles, T.S.; Pereira, J.P.; Orofino, D.; et al. Association Between Antenatal Exposure to Zika Virus and Anatomical and Neurodevelopmental Abnormalities in Children. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e209303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pessoa, A.; van der Linden, V.; Yeargin-Allsopp, M.; Carvalho, M.D.C.G.; Ribeiro, E.M.; Van Naarden Braun, K.; Durkin, M.S.; Pastula, D.M.; Moore, J.T.; Moore, C.A. Motor Abnormalities and Epilepsy in Infants and Children with Evidence of Congenital Zika Virus Infection. Pediatrics 2018, 141, S167–S179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Jcm 11 01351 g001 550
Figure 1. Algorithm of diagnosis for ZIKV infection in endemic countries.
Figure 1. Algorithm of diagnosis for ZIKV infection in endemic countries.
Jcm 11 01351 g001
Jcm 11 01351 g002 550
Figure 2. Algorithm of postnatal management of suspected congenital ZIKV infection.
Figure 2. Algorithm of postnatal management of suspected congenital ZIKV infection.
Jcm 11 01351 g002
Table
Table 1. Indicators for diagnosis of ZIKV infection in the first trimester.
Table 1. Indicators for diagnosis of ZIKV infection in the first trimester.
DiagnosisExam TimingMorphological FeaturesFurther Remarks
ZIKV infectionPolymerase Chain Reaction analysis of amniotic fluid best period to perform an amniocentesis is between the 21st and 22nd week Around 6–9 weeks are required after maternal infection for the virus to be eliminated in the fetal urine in amounts detectable in the amniotic fluid
Anti-CMV IgM antibodies
Virus-specific IgM antibodies may be detectable >3 days after onset of illness		Blood examNo detectable virus-specific IgM antibodies in serum collected within 7 days of illness onsetIgM testing should be repeated on a convalescent-phase sample to rule out infection in the mother with a clinical syndrome suggestive of ZIKV infection.
IgM antibodies are only present in 70% infected babies
MicrocephalyNeurosonographic approaches for the detection of malformations Head circumference < 2SDSAn estimated 1% to 13% risk of microcephaly is associated with maternal infection in the first trimester of pregnancy
VentriculomegalyUltrasound examinationAtrial diameter ≥ 10 mm on prenatal ultrasoundRoughly 5% of cases of mild to moderate ventriculomegaly reportedly arise from congenital fetal infections, such as CMV, toxoplasmosis and ZIKV
Brain calcifications Posterior fossa destruction lesionsUltrasound examination; MRIMore visible in II-III trimester Punctate calcifications between the cortex and subcortical white matter
Disproportion in fetal growthUltrasoundFemur-sparing profile of growth restrictionInfection in the first trimester is linked to the highest risk of structural and developmental anomalies
Germinolytic cysts (GLC) and lenticulostriate vasculopathy (LSV)Transvaginal scan Found in up to 37% of newborns exposed to ZIKV in utero, might constitute potential risk factors for worse early neurodevelopmental outcomes
Cerebellar hypoplasia and migrational disorders such as polymicrogyria (PMG)MRI Polymicrogyria and pachygyria mostly detected in the frontal lobes
Table
Table 2. MRI findings in congenital ZIKV infection.
Table 2. MRI findings in congenital ZIKV infection.
CT 1 and MRI 2 Findings in Congenital Zika Syndrome
Punctate calcifications (basal ganglia > thalami)
Severe ventriculomegaly
Global delayed or hypo-myelination
Pachygyria or polymicrogyria (mostly in the frontal lobes)
Hypoplasia of the cerebellum and the brainstem.
Enlarged cisterna magna
Abnormalities of corpus callosum (hypoplasia/hypogenesis)
Cysts/Pseudocysts (mainly in the occipital area)
1 CT: computed tomography; 2 MRI: magnetic resonance.
Table
Table 3. MRI findings in congenital CMV infection.
Table 3. MRI findings in congenital CMV infection.
MRI Findings in Congenital CMV 1 Infection
White matter hyperintensities
Ventriculomegaly
Ventriculitis
Calcifications
Cysts/Pseudocysts
1 CMV: Cytomegalovirus.
Table
Table 4. Clinical signs of congenital ZIKV syndrome.
Table 4. Clinical signs of congenital ZIKV syndrome.
Congenital Zika Syndrome Clinical Signs
Microcephaly
Hydrocephalus
Cerebral Palsy
Epilepsy
Neurodevelopmental disorders
Ear and Eye abnormalities
Cardiac malformations
Growth delay
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gullo, G.; Scaglione, M.; Cucinella, G.; Riva, A.; Coldebella, D.; Cavaliere, A.F.; Signore, F.; Buzzaccarini, G.; Spagnol, G.; Laganà, A.S.; et al. Congenital Zika Syndrome: Genetic Avenues for Diagnosis and Therapy, Possible Management and Long-Term Outcomes. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051351

AMA Style

Gullo G, Scaglione M, Cucinella G, Riva A, Coldebella D, Cavaliere AF, Signore F, Buzzaccarini G, Spagnol G, Laganà AS, et al. Congenital Zika Syndrome: Genetic Avenues for Diagnosis and Therapy, Possible Management and Long-Term Outcomes. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(5):1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051351

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gullo, Giuseppe, Marco Scaglione, Gaspare Cucinella, Arianna Riva, Davide Coldebella, Anna Franca Cavaliere, Fabrizio Signore, Giovanni Buzzaccarini, Giulia Spagnol, Antonio Simone Laganà, and et al. 2022. "Congenital Zika Syndrome: Genetic Avenues for Diagnosis and Therapy, Possible Management and Long-Term Outcomes" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 5: 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051351

APA Style

Gullo, G., Scaglione, M., Cucinella, G., Riva, A., Coldebella, D., Cavaliere, A. F., Signore, F., Buzzaccarini, G., Spagnol, G., Laganà, A. S., Noventa, M., & Zaami, S. (2022). Congenital Zika Syndrome: Genetic Avenues for Diagnosis and Therapy, Possible Management and Long-Term Outcomes. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(5), 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051351

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop