Next Article in Journal
Modulation of Central Nociceptive Transmission by Manual Pressure Techniques in Patients with Migraine: An Observational Study
Previous Article in Journal
Classification of Stiff-Knee Gait Kinematic Severity after Stroke Using Retrospective k-Means Clustering Algorithm
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

SARS-CoV-2—The Role of Natural Immunity: A Narrative Review

1
School of Musictherapy, Université Européenne Jean Monnet, 35129 Padova, Italy
2
Guzzardi Hospital, 97019 Vittoria, Italy
3
Eurocenter Venalinfa, 63074 San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
4
Independent Researcher, 44123 Ferrara, Italy
5
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Mirandola Hospital, 41037 Mirandola, Italy
6
ARPAV (Regional Agency for the Environment Protection), 31100 Treviso, Italy
7
Cardiology Department, Valdese Hospital, 10100 Torino, Italy
8
Independent Researcher, 60124 Ancona, Italy
9
Independent Researcher, 42023 Reggio Emilia, Italy
10
Istituto di Medicina Biologica, 20129 Milano, Italy
11
Environment and Health Commission, National Bioarchitecture Institute, 20121 Milano, Italy
12
Independent Medical Scientific Commission, 20131 Milano, Italy
13
ASSIS Association, 56123 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(21), 6272; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216272
Submission received: 25 September 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 20 October 2022 / Published: 25 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Immunology & Rheumatology)

Abstract

Background: Both natural immunity and vaccine-induced immunity to COVID-19 may be useful to reduce the mortality/morbidity of this disease, but still a lot of controversy exists. Aims: This narrative review analyzes the literature regarding these two immunitary processes and more specifically: (a) the duration of natural immunity; (b) cellular immunity; (c) cross-reactivity; (d) the duration of post-vaccination immune protection; (e) the probability of reinfection and its clinical manifestations in the recovered patients; (f) the comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated as to the possible reinfections; (g) the role of hybrid immunity; (h) the effectiveness of natural and vaccine-induced immunity against Omicron variant; (i) the comparative incidence of adverse effects after vaccination in recovered individuals vs. COVID-19-naïve subjects. Material and Methods: through multiple search engines we investigated COVID-19 literature related to the aims of the review, published since April 2020 through July 2022, including also the previous articles pertinent to the investigated topics. Results: nearly 900 studies were collected, and 246 pertinent articles were included. It was highlighted that the vast majority of the individuals after suffering from COVID-19 develop a natural immunity both of cell-mediated and humoral type, which is effective over time and provides protection against both reinfection and serious illness. Vaccine-induced immunity was shown to decay faster than natural immunity. In general, the severity of the symptoms of reinfection is significantly lower than in the primary infection, with a lower degree of hospitalizations (0.06%) and an extremely low mortality. Conclusions: this extensive narrative review regarding a vast number of articles highlighted the valuable protection induced by the natural immunity after COVID-19, which seems comparable or superior to the one induced by anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Consequently, vaccination of the unvaccinated COVID-19-recovered subjects may not be indicated. Further research is needed in order to: (a) measure the durability of immunity over time; (b) evaluate both the impacts of Omicron BA.5 on vaccinated and healed subjects and the role of hybrid immunity.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; natural immunity; cellular immunity; vaccine-induced immunity; hybrid immunity; cross-reactivity; Omicron COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; natural immunity; cellular immunity; vaccine-induced immunity; hybrid immunity; cross-reactivity; Omicron

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Diani, S.; Leonardi, E.; Cavezzi, A.; Ferrari, S.; Iacono, O.; Limoli, A.; Bouslenko, Z.; Natalini, D.; Conti, S.; Mantovani, M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2—The Role of Natural Immunity: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6272. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216272

AMA Style

Diani S, Leonardi E, Cavezzi A, Ferrari S, Iacono O, Limoli A, Bouslenko Z, Natalini D, Conti S, Mantovani M, et al. SARS-CoV-2—The Role of Natural Immunity: A Narrative Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(21):6272. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216272

Chicago/Turabian Style

Diani, Sara, Erika Leonardi, Attilio Cavezzi, Simona Ferrari, Oriana Iacono, Alice Limoli, Zoe Bouslenko, Daniele Natalini, Stefania Conti, Mauro Mantovani, and et al. 2022. "SARS-CoV-2—The Role of Natural Immunity: A Narrative Review" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 21: 6272. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216272

APA Style

Diani, S., Leonardi, E., Cavezzi, A., Ferrari, S., Iacono, O., Limoli, A., Bouslenko, Z., Natalini, D., Conti, S., Mantovani, M., Tramonte, S., Donzelli, A., & Serravalle, E. (2022). SARS-CoV-2—The Role of Natural Immunity: A Narrative Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(21), 6272. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216272

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop