Next Article in Journal
Productivity Improvement of Human Papillomavirus-like Particles in Insect Cells Using Hyper-Expression Baculovirus Vector
Previous Article in Journal
The Experience of an Accelerated COVID-19 Immunization Campaign in Oman: A Review Within the WHO Health System Building Blocks Framework
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vaccines and Vaccination: Feature Papers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Plans-Rubió, P. Vaccines and Vaccination: Feature Papers. Vaccines 2025, 13, 720

by
Pedro Plans-Rubió
College of Physicians of Barcelona, 08017 Barcelona, Spain
Vaccines 2025, 13(10), 1005; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13101005
Submission received: 10 September 2025 / Accepted: 23 September 2025 / Published: 25 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: Feature Papers)
The author would like to make the following correction to this publication [1].
In the original publication, one article from the Special Issue was inadvertently omitted:
Limbu, Y.B.; Gautam, R.K. How Well the Constructs of Health Belief Model Predict Vaccination Intention: A Systematic Review on COVID-19 Primary Series and Booster Vaccines. Vaccines 2023, 11, 816.
The author would like to insert this article as the sixth reference in [1], together with the original references [3–5], therefore changing the sentence “studies assessing vaccination hesitancy and vaccination acceptance [3–5]” to “studies assessing vaccination hesitancy and vaccination acceptance [3–6]” in the first paragraph. Following this change, all subsequent references cited in [1] will be reordered.
In the fourth paragraph, the first sentence is changed from “Three articles published in this Special Issue were focused on vaccination acceptance and vaccination hesitancy [3–5]” to “Four articles published in this Special Issue were focused on vaccination acceptance and vaccination hesitancy [3–6]”.
The following paragraph should be inserted as the seventh paragraph:
“The article by Limbu and Gautam [6] presents the results of a systematic review assessing the relationships between Health Belief Model (HBM) constructs and COVID-19 vaccination intention. This study found that perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and cues to action were the three most frequent predictors for primary and booster COVID-19 vaccination.”
The author states that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Plans-Rubió, P. Vaccines and Vaccination: Feature Papers. Vaccines 2025, 13, 720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Plans-Rubió, P. Correction: Plans-Rubió, P. Vaccines and Vaccination: Feature Papers. Vaccines 2025, 13, 720. Vaccines 2025, 13, 1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13101005

AMA Style

Plans-Rubió P. Correction: Plans-Rubió, P. Vaccines and Vaccination: Feature Papers. Vaccines 2025, 13, 720. Vaccines. 2025; 13(10):1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13101005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Plans-Rubió, Pedro. 2025. "Correction: Plans-Rubió, P. Vaccines and Vaccination: Feature Papers. Vaccines 2025, 13, 720" Vaccines 13, no. 10: 1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13101005

APA Style

Plans-Rubió, P. (2025). Correction: Plans-Rubió, P. Vaccines and Vaccination: Feature Papers. Vaccines 2025, 13, 720. Vaccines, 13(10), 1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13101005

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop