Emerging Cutting-Edge Technologies and Applications for Safer, Sustainable, and Intelligent Road Systems in Smart Cities: A Review
Abstract
1. Introduction
- KQ1: What is the role of AI-driven technologies, and to what extent do they contribute to making the road transportation system intelligent?
- KQ2: What are the boundaries between the disciplines of potential interest, the margins of overlap and integration, and the benefits of dialogue among them in effectively contributing to the development of an AI-driven approach suitable for the design, contextualization, construction, and management of a smart road system in cities?
- KQ3: Is it possible to assess the adaptive capacity of the road system and its components to handle changes during the transition to a technologically sustainable urban environment?
2. Materials and Methods for Literature Review
Building a Framework for a Multidisciplinary Knowledge Base
- Smart Infrastructure (KT1): Integrating road design with advanced technologies developed for sensors and big data facilitates communication with vehicles, promoting smarter and more responsive infrastructure. This theme encompasses articles grouped under Sustainable Smart Mobility and Infrastructure Development (KST11) [24,25,26,27,28] and Data-driven Smart Infrastructure Optimization (KST12) [10,29,30,31,32,33].
- Traffic Management (KT2): Developing new approaches and tools to coordinate and control traffic involves monitoring, signal adjustment, and smart technologies to optimize road networks. Articles were grouped under Real-time Traffic Monitoring (KST21) [34,35,36,37,38] and Predictive Analytics (KST22) [6,19,39,40,41,42,43].
- Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) (KT3): This topic emphasizes next-generation obstacle recognition and decision-making systems for navigation and control, aiming to improve vehicle interaction with transportation systems and ensure safer roads. Articles were grouped under sub-themes as Navigation and Control (KST31) [44,45,46] and Advanced Communication Technologies for AVs (KST32) [47,48,49,50,51].
- Environmental Impact (KT5): The theme concerns deploying innovative methods and tools to develop solutions for reducing pollution and improving energy efficiency, thereby supporting sustainable transportation practices. It encompasses articles grouped under Emissions Reduction (KST51) [9,60] and Energy Efficiency (KST52) [61,62,63,64].
- User Experience (KT6): The theme focuses on developing and implementing advanced tools to offer personalized navigation and route suggestions based on traffic conditions, thereby enhancing driver satisfaction [65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73]. The articles were grouped into Enhanced Mobility (KST61) [65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72] and Personalized Services (KST62), which focus on individual customization [73].
- Road Maintenance (KT7): Advanced technologies for predictive maintenance and road issue detection aim to enhance safety and infrastructure durability. The sub-themes included both Predictive Maintenance (KST71) [12,74,75,76] and Smart Materials Integration and Performance Analysis (KST72) [77,78,79].
- Road Intersection (KT8): The theme focuses on designing human-centric road intersections integrated with an AI-powered, citizen-friendly traffic management system for crowded cities. Articles were grouped under Innovative Intersection Design through Simulation (KST81) [80,81,82] and Smart Intersection Management (KST82) [83,84].
3. Literature-Informed Review
3.1. Smart Infrastructure
3.2. Traffic Management
3.3. Autonomous Vehicles
3.4. Safety Enhancements
3.5. Environmental Impact
3.6. User Experience
3.7. Road Maintenance
3.8. Road Intersection
3.9. Major Findings from the Literature on the Joint Topic
4. Discussion
4.1. Answering the Key Questions
4.2. Insights and Reflections in AI Innovations for Road Transportation and Smart Cities
5. Conclusions
- Future updates should expand and diversify data sources to incorporate larger-scale, regional, and empirical case studies that move beyond pilot projects and simulations. This will improve evaluations of the real-world effectiveness, long-term robustness, and scalability of AI-driven transportation solutions across diverse urban contexts, and facilitate the examination of societal acceptance and privacy concerns related to data collection and usage.
- Establish universally accepted standards for data interoperability, cybersecurity, system resilience, and privacy protection. Such frameworks will facilitate smoother integration, foster public trust, support the wider deployment of intelligent mobility solutions, and address concerns around data security and ethical use.
- Further investigation is necessary to understand and mitigate socio-economic and policy barriers, including deployment costs, energy consumption, digital divides, and socio-political challenges. Environmental sustainability could be emphasized through eco-friendly materials, green infrastructure, and renewable energy policies. It is also crucial to ensure accessibility for vulnerable groups to promote equitable benefits from smart mobility and foster social acceptance.
- Future studies should focus on creating effective models for cross-sector engagement, involving engineers, urban planners, policymakers, industry leaders, and communities, to better align technological innovation with societal values, ethical considerations, privacy protections, and adaptable regulatory frameworks. This will support a responsible and inclusive transition from research to impactful deployment.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AI | Artificial Intelligence |
| AIoT | AI of Things |
| AV (AVs) | Autonomous Vehicle (Autonomous Vehicles) |
| C-V2X | Cellular Vehicle-to-Everything |
| CNN | Convolutional Neural Network |
| CAV (CAVs) | Connected Autonomous Vehicle (Connected Autonomous Vehicles) |
| DL | Deep Learning |
| FL | Federated Learning |
| GIS | Geographic Information System |
| GPS | Global Positioning System |
| GSM | Global System for Mobile |
| IoT | Internet-of-Things |
| IoV | Internet-of-Vehicles |
| ITS | Intelligent Transportation Systems |
| LSTM | Long Short-Term Memory |
| ML | Machine Learning |
| KQ (KQs) | Key Question (Key Questions) |
| KT (KTs) | Key Theme (Key Themes) |
| KST (KSTs) | Key sub-theme (Key sub-themes) |
| RL | Reinforcement Learning |
| TranAD | Transformer-based Anomaly Detection |
| V2X | Vehicle-to-Everything |
| V2V | Vehicle-to-Vehicle |
| YOLO | You Only Look Once |
References
- Rui, J.; Othengrafen, F. Examining the Role of Innovative Streets in Enhancing Urban Mobility and Livability for Sustainable Urban Transition: A Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, T.; Klavins, J.; Xu, T.; Zafric, N.M.; Stern, R. Identifying built environment factors influencing driver yielding behavior at unsignalized intersections: A naturalistic open-source dataset collected in Minnesota. J. Saf. Res. 2025, 92, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ni, D. Signalized Intersections, 1st ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; p. 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yaibok, C.; Suwanno, P.; Pornbunyanon, T.; Kanjanakul, C.; Luathep, P.; Fukuda, A. Improving urban intersection safety insights from simulation analysis. IATSS Res. 2024, 48, 523–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pompigna, A.; Mauro, R. Smart roads: A state of the art of highways innovations in the Smart Age. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2022, 25, 100986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ait Ouallane, A.; Bakali, A.; Bahnasse, A.; Broumi, S.; Talea, M. Fusion of engineering insights and emerging trends: Intelligent urban traffic management system. Inf. Fusion 2022, 88, 218–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Q.; Chen, H. Enhancing Freeway Traffic Capacity: The Impact of Autonomous Vehicle Platooning Intensity. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saki, S.; Soori, M. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Advanced Transportation Systems, A Review. Multimodal Transp. 2025, 100242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Zhou, D.; Wu, C. Strategies for sustainable road transport: Technological innovation and organizational management through AI. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2025, 141, 104651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tay, L.; Lim, J.M.-Y.M.; Liang, S.-N.; Chua, K.K.; Tay, Y.H. Intelligent traffic rerouting with dynamic vehicle selection for congestion mitigation. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2025, 154, 111022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, Z.; Al-Turjman, F.; Mostarda, L.; Gagliardi, R. Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine learning in smart cities. Comput. Commun. 2020, 154, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmudah, H.; Aisjah, A.S.; Arifin, S.; Arif Prastyantyo, C. iYOLOV7-TPE-SS: Leveraging Improved YOLO Model With Multilevel Hyperparameter Optimization for Road Damage Detection on Edge Devices. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 79247–79263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alahi, M.E.E.; Sukkuea, A.; Tina, F.W.; Nag, A.; Kurdthongmee, W.; Suwannarat, K.; Mukhopadhyay, S.C. Integration of IoT-Enabled Technologies and Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Smart City Scenario: Recent Advancements and Future Trends. Sensors 2023, 23, 5206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kataria, A.; Rani, S.; Kautish, S. Artificial Intelligence of Things for Sustainable Development of Smart City Infrastructures. In Digital Technologies to Implement the UN Sustainable Development Goals; Leal Filho, W., Kautish, S., Wall, T., Rewhorn, S., Paul, S.K., Eds.; World Sustainability Series; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 187–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmood, Z. Digital Image Processing: Advanced Technologies and Applications. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez, H.D.E.; Insuasti, J. Artificial intelligence and vehicle license plate recognition: A literature review. Edelweiss Appl. Sci. Technol. 2025, 9, 1967–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, S.; Kaye, S.A.; Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telemat. Inform. 2023, 77, 101925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holl, C. The content intelligence: An argument against the lethality of artificial intelligence. Discov. Artif. Intell. 2024, 4, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleem, M.; Farooq, M.; Shahzad, T.; Hassan, A.; Abbas, S.; Ali, T. Secure and Transparent Mobility in Smart Cities: Revolutionizing AVNs to Predict Traffic Congestion Using MapReduce, Private Blockchain, and XAI. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 131541–131555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. PLoS Med. 2021, 18, e1003583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scopus Citation Database. Available online: https://www.scopus.com (accessed on 17 June 2025).
- Google Trends. Available online: https://trends.google.it/ (accessed on 17 June 2025).
- Salloum, S.A.; Khan, R.; Shaalan, K. A Survey of Semantic Analysis Approaches. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Hassanien, AE., Azar, A., Gaber, T., Oliva, D., Tolba, F., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 1153, pp. 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alanazi, F. Development of smart mobility infrastructure in Saudi Arabia: A benchmarking approach. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerrieri, M.; Parla, G. Smart tramway systems for smart cities: A deep learning application in ADAS systems. Int. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Res. 2022, 20, 745–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Q.; Hou, Y.; Yang, H.; Tan, P.; Shi, H.; Xu, Z.; Ye, Z.; Chen, N.; Qu, X.; Han, X.; et al. Towards a sustainable monitoring: A self-powered smart transportation infrastructure skin. Nano Energy 2022, 90, 107245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuru, K.; Khan, W. A Framework for the Synergistic Integration of Fully Autonomous Ground Vehicles with Smart City. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 923–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.; Zhai, C.; Wang, H.; Zhang, R.; Qiu, Z.; Wu, J. Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control and exhaust emission evaluation under heterogeneous connected vehicle network environment in urban city. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 256, 109975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghani Khan, M.U.; Elhadef, M.; Mehmood, A. Intelligent Urban Cities: Optimal Path Selection Based on Ad HocNetwork. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 19259–19268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naveed, Q.N.; Alqahtani, H.; Khan, R.U.; Almakdi, S.; Alshehri, M.; Abdul Rasheed, M.A. An Intelligent Traffic Surveillance System Using Integrated Wireless Sensor Network and Improved Phase Timing Optimization. Sensors 2022, 22, 3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Chen, C.-M.; Hossain, M.S.; Muhammad, G.; Kumar, S.; Kumari, S. Transfer reinforcement learning-based road object detection in next generation IoT domain. Comput. Netw. 2021, 193, 108078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández-Jiménez, R.; Cardenas, C.; Muñoz Rodríguez, D. Modeling and Solution of the Routing Problem in Vehicular Delay-Tolerant Networks: A Dual, Deep Learning Perspective. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habibzadeh, H.; Boggio-Dandry, A.; Qin, Z.; Soyata, T.; Kantarci, B.; Mouftah, H.T. Soft Sensing in Smart Cities: Handling 3Vs Using Recommender Systems, Machine Intelligence, and Data Analytics. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puzio, E.; Drożdż, W.; Kolon, M. The Role of Intelligent Transport Systems and Smart Technologies in Urban Traffic Management in Polish Smart Cities. Energies 2025, 18, 2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ventura, H.T.; Moretti, R.D.A.; Vendramin, A.C.B.K.; Pigatto, D.F. Intrusion detection in vehicular networks using machine learning. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 2025, 16, 174–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dadheech, A.; Bhavsar, M.; Verma, J.P.; Prasad, V.K. Deep learning based smart traffic management using video analytics and IoT sensor fusion. Soft Comput. 2024, 28, 13461–13476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moumen, I.; Abouchabaka, J.; Rafalia, N. Enhancing urban mobility: Integration of IoT road traffic data and artificial intelligence in smart city environment. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2023, 32, 985–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, A.Y.; Cao, L.J.; Han, Y.; Gao, S.N.; Li, X.; Zhao, W. Design of a low-power road monitoring system for smart cities based on wireless sensor network. Adv. Transp. Stud. 2021, 53, 183–196. [Google Scholar]
- Mrad, S.; Mraihi, R.; Murthy, A.S. Efficient implementation of a wavelet neural network model forshort-term traffic fl ow prediction: Sensitivity analysis. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 2025, 17, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheeba, G.; Selvaganesan, J. An intelligent and resolute Traffic Management System using GRCNet-StMO model for smart vehicular networks. Int. J. Inf. Tecnol. 2024, 16, 5077–5090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinsha, S.D.; Amutha, B. Velocious: A Resilient IoT Architecture for 6G Based Intelligent Transportation System with Expeditious Movement Mechanism. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2024, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musa, A.A.; Malami, S.I.; Alanazi, F.; Ounaies, W.; Alshammari, M.; Haruna, S.I. Sustainable Traffic Management for Smart Cities Using Internet-of-Things-Oriented Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS): Challenges and Recommendations. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, K.; Jiang, C.; Li, P.; Shan, A.; Wan, J.; Qin, W. A systematic framework for urban smart transportation towards traffic management and parking. Electron. Res. Arch. 2022, 30, 4191–4208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dewi, C.; Chernovita, H.P.; Philemon, S.A.; Ananta, C.A.; Dai, G.W.; Chen, A.P.S. Integration of YOLOv9 and contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization for nighttime traffic sign detection. Math. Model. Eng. Probl. 2025, 12, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, R.-C.; Dewi, C.; Zhuang, Y.-C.; Chen, J.-K. Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization for Recognizing Road Marking at Night Based on Yolo Models. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 92926–92942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleh, S.N.; Fathy, C. A Novel Deep-Learning Model for Remote Driver Monitoring in SDN-Based Internet of Autonomous Vehicles Using 5G Technologies. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Han, C.; Liu, X.; Li, W. Vehicle Artificial Intelligence System Based on Intelligent Image Analysis and 5G Network. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 2023, 30, 86–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Lv, Z. Artificial intelligence enabled Digital Twins for training autonomous cars. Internet Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. 2022, 2, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamza, M.A.; Hilal, A.M.; Alshahrani, H.M.; Al-Wesabi, F.N.; Mahgoub, H.; Duhayyim, M.A. Artificial intelligence based clustering with routing protocol for internet of vehicles. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2022, 70, 5835–5853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahrez, Z.; Sabir, E.; Badidi, E.; Saad, W.; Sadik, M. Smart Urban Mobility: When Mobility Systems Meet Smart Data. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 23, 6222–6239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reebadiya, D.; Rathod, T.; Gupta, R.; Tanwar, S.; Kumar, N. Blockchain-based Secure and Intelligent Sensing Scheme for Autonomous Vehicles Activity Tracking Beyond 5G Networks. Peer-Peer Netw. Appl. 2021, 14, 2757–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Lee, W.-C.; Liu, N.; Fu, Q.; Wan, F.; Yu, G. A Data-Driven Deep Learning Framework for Prediction of Traffic Crashes at Road Intersections. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Topilin, I.; Feofilova, A.; Shao, M.; Wang, Y. Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems: The Impact of C-V2X Communication Technologies on Road Safety and Traffic Efficiency. Sensors 2025, 25, 2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jagatheesaperumal, S.K.; Bibri, S.E.; Huang, J.; Rajapandian, J.; Parthiban, B. Artificial intelligence of things for smart cities: Advanced solutions for enhancing transportation safety. Comput. Urban Sci. 2024, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djazia, Z.; Kazar, O.; Harous, S.; Benharzallah, S. Collaborative Cloud-V. Edge System for Predicting Traffic Accident Risk Using Machine Learning Based IOV. Int. J. Comput. Their Appl. 2023, 30, 362–376. [Google Scholar]
- Bokolo, A.J. Inclusive and Safe Mobility Needs of Senior Citizens: Implications for Age-Friendly Cities and Communities. Urban Sci. 2023, 7, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domínguez, J.M.L.; Sanguino, T.J.M. Walking secure: Safe routing planning algorithm and pedestrian’s crossing intention detector based on fuzzy logic app. Sensors 2021, 21, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Jia, H.; Wang, Y. Urban expressway parallel pattern recognition based on intelligent IOT data processing for smart city. Comput. Commun. 2020, 155, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pathik, N.; Gupta, R.K.; Sahu, Y.; Sharma, A.; Masud, M.; Baz, M. AI Enabled Accident Detection and Alert System Using IoT and Deep Learning for Smart Cities. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rauniyar, A.; Berge, T.; Kuijpers, A.; van Gils, E.; Kirchhoff, N.; Litzinger, P.; Peeters, B.; Håkegård, J.E. NEMO: Real-Time Noise and Exhaust Emissions Monitoring for Sustainable and Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 25497–25517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar Reddy, K.H.; Goswami, R.S.; Sinha Roy, D. A futuristic green service computing approach for smart city: A fog layered intelligent service management model for smart transport system. Comput. Commun. 2023, 212, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Selwi, H.F.; Aziz, A.B.A.; Abas, F.S.; Hamzah, N.A.A.; Mahmud, A.B. The impact of weather data on traffic flow prediction models. IAES Int. J. Artif. Intell. 2022, 11, 1223–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Srikanth, P.; Nayyar, A.; Sharma, G.; Krishnamurthi, R.; Alazab, M. A Novel Simulated-Annealing Based Electric Bus System Design, Simulation, and Analysis for Dehradun Smart City. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 89395–89424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reid, A.R.; Pérez, C.R.C.; Rodríguez, D.M. Inference of vehicular traffic in smart cities using machine learning with the internet of things. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2018, 12, 459–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Kim, M.-Y. Promoting Sustainable Transportation: How People Trust and Accept Autonomous Vehicles—Focusing on the Different Levels of Collaboration Between Human Drivers and Artificial Intelligence—An Empirical Study with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling and Multi-Group Analysis. Sustainability 2025, 17, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Issaouı, I.; Selmi, A. Weighted Soft Discernibility Matrix with Deep Learning Assisted Face Mask Detection for Smart City Environment. Int. J. Neutrosophic Sci. 2025, 25, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Z.; Cheng, C.; Guerrieri, A.; Fortino, G. Behavioral Modeling and Prediction in Social Perception and Computing: A Survey. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 2023, 10, 2008–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, T.A.; Rajmohan, R.; Pavithra, M.; Ajagbe, S.A.; Hodhod, R.; Gaber, T. Automatic Face Mask Detection System in Public Transportation in Smart Cities Using IoT and Deep Learning. Electronics 2022, 11, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sepasgozar, S.S.; Pierre, S. Fed-NTP: A Federated Learning Algorithm for Network Traffic Prediction in VANET. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 119607–119616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gollapalli, M.; Atta-Ur-Rahman; Musleh, D.; Ibrahim, N.; Adnan Khan, M.; Abbas, S.; Atta, A.; Aftab Khan, M.; Farooqui, M.; IqbaL, T.; et al. A Neuro-Fuzzy Approach to Road Traffic Congestion Prediction. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2022, 73, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.; Sharma, R.; Vaseem Akram, S.; Gehlot, A.; Buddhi, D.; Kumar Malik, P.; Arya, R. Highway 4.0: Digitalization of highways for vulnerable road safety development with intelligent IoT sensors and machine learning. Saf. Sci. 2021, 143, 105407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domínguez, J.M.L.; Al-Tam, F.; Sanguino, T.J.M.; Correia, N. Analysis of machine learning techniques applied to sensory detection of vehicles in intelligent crosswalks. Sensors 2020, 20, 6019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, W.; Hizam, S.M.; Sentosa, I.; Habiba, A.; Yafi, E.; Ali, J. Predicting IoT service adoption towards smart mobility in Malaysia: SEM-neural hybrid pilot study. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2020, 11, 524–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, C.; Pournaras, E. Coordination of drones at scale: Decentralized energy-awareswarm intelligence for spatio-temporal sensing. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2023, 157, 104387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hijji, M.; Iqbal, R.; Kumar Pandey, A.; Doctor, F.; Karyotis, C.; Wahid, R.; Alshehri, A.; Aradah, F. 6G Connected Vehicle Framework to Support Intelligent Road Maintenance Using Deep Learning Data Fusion. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023, 24, 7726–7735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swarnkar, R.; Harikrishnan, R.; Thakur, P.; Singh, G. Electric Vehicle Lithium-ion Battery Ageing Analysis Under Dynamic Condition: A Machine Learning Approach. SAIEE Afr. Res. J. 2023, 114, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabbar, A.H.; Chahid, A.; Isham, M.U.; Grover, S.; Singh, K.P.; Elgazzar, K.; Mousa, A.; Ouda, H. HAIS: Highways Automated-Inspection System. Technologies 2023, 11, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jagatheesaperumal, S.K.; Bibri, S.E.; Ganesan, S.; Jeyaraman, P. Artificial Intelligence for road quality assessment in smart cities: A machine learning approach to acoustic data analysis. Comput. Urban Sci. 2023, 3, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Yang, H.; Ke, R.; Wei, S.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y. Cooperative and Comprehensive Multi-Task Surveillance Sensing and Interaction System Empowered by Edge Artificial Intelligence. Transp. Res. Rec. 2023, 2677, 652–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anitha, C.; Sharma, S.; Nassa, V.K.; Agrawal, S.K.; Rajasekaran, A.; Mahaveerakannan, R. Artificial Intelligence Powered Congestion Free Transportation System Through Extensive Simulations. J. Mach. Comput. 2024, 4, 250–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, J.; Wang, M.; Wu, Y. Research on Pedestrian Crossing Decision Models and Predictions Based on Machine Learning. Sensors 2024, 24, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, M.; Sheng, H.; Irvin, J.; Chung, H.; Ying, A.; Sun, T.; Ng, A.Y.; Rodriguez, D.A. Marked crosswalks in US transit-oriented station areas, 2007–2020: A computer vision approach using street view imagery. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 2023, 50, 350–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aydin, M.M.; Potoglou, D.; Cipcigan, L. Working principle and performance evolution of camera-based intelligent signalized intersections: Samsun city, Türkiye example. Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technology. Ser. Transp. 2023, 121, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, C.-H.; Hwang, M.-C. Value-based deep reinforcement learning for adaptive isolated intersection signal control. IET Intell. Transp. Systems 2018, 12, 1005–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tumminello, M.L.; Zare, N.; Macioszek, E.; Granà, A. Assaying Traffic Settings with Connected and Automated Mobility Channeled into Road Intersection Design. Smart Cities 2025, 8, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barceló, J. Fundamentals of Traffic Simulation, 1st ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; p. 442. [Google Scholar]
- Sarrab, M.; Pulparambil, S.; Awadalla, M. Development of an IoT based real-time traffic monitoring system for city governance. Glob. Transit. 2020, 2, 230–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahu, S.K.; Mokhade, A.; Bokde, N.D. An Overview of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Reinforcement Learning-Based Techniques in Quantitative Finance: Recent Progress and Challenges. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tselentis, D.I.; Eleonora Papadimitriou, E.; van Gelder, P. The usefulness of artificial intelligence for safety assessment of different transport modes. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2023, 186, 107034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, H.; Ling, Y.; Kopca, C.; Ricord, S.; Wang, Y. Cooperative traffic signal assistance system for non-motorized users and disabilities empowered by computer vision and edge artificial intelligence. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2022, 145, 103896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, P.; Singh, G. Enabling Technologies for Sustainable Smart City. In Sustainable Smart Cities; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosire, J.N.; Major, B.V.; Karieko, O.R.; Nyakebogo, O.A. Design and Evaluation of Optimization Algorithms for Adaptive Traffic Signal Control and Scalable Simulation of Large-Scale Traffic Networks. Earthline J. Math. Sci. 2025, 15, 889–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khanmohamadi, M.; Guerrieri, M. Smart Intersections and Connected Autonomous Vehicles for Sustainable Smart Cities: A Brief Review. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, S.; Yue, T.; You, Y.; Lv, Z.; Tang, X.; Hu, J.; Yin, H.A. Resilience Recovery Method for Complex Traffic Network Security Based on Trend Forecasting. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2025, 2025, 3715086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lasota, M.; Jacyna, M.; Szaciłło, L. Fault tree methods as a decision-making tool for assessing the risk of transportation dangerous loads. Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technol. Ser. Transp. 2024, 123, 133–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolniak, R.; Stecuła, K. Artificial Intelligence in Smart Cities—Applications, Barriers, and Future Directions: A Review. Smart Cities 2024, 7, 1346–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Authors (Country 1, Year) | Study Focus | Methodology | Findings and Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainable Smart Mobility and Infrastructure Development (KST11) | |||
| Alanazi (Saudi Arabia, 2023) [24] | Lessons from advanced countries for infrastructure development. | Benchmark analysis to identify literature-informed indicators. | Strategic roadmap but outdated data quickly becomes irrelevant. |
| Guerrieri and Parla (Italy, 2022) [25] | Recognizing pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles near tramways. | DL technique tested using real-world data. | Accurate user location (96%); processing speed need improvement. |
| Zheng et al. (China, 2022) [26] | Smart road infrastructure for traffic classification and monitoring. | Applying AI models to analyze real-time traffic patterns. | 89% accuracy; adaptability across varied environments is challenging. |
| Kuru and Khan (UK, 2021) [27] | Integrating AVs into urban road infrastructure. | Dynamic modeling and scenario analysis. | Lessons learned for self-driving integration and city implementation. |
| Huang et al. (China, 2020) [28] | Applications in cooperative vehicle infrastructure systems in cities. | Simulating driving strategies through scenario analysis | Driving behavior should be tested under more realistic road designs. |
| Data-Driven Smart Infrastructure Optimization (KsT12) | |||
| Tay et al. (Malaysia, 2025) [10] | Traffic prediction and congestion assessment. | Implementing traffic rerouting and dynamic vehicle selection. | 33% travel time reduction; issues of system scalability persist. |
| Ghani Khan et al. (Pakistan, 2023) [29] | Developing path selection algorithm with V2X exchange. | Literature review, crowdsensing, data analysis and simulation. | 23% travel time reduction; concerns about network decentralization and scalability persist |
| Naveed et al. (Saudi Arabia, 2022) [30] | Developing a vision-based traffic system in virtual environment. | Wireless sensor data simulation and visual analytics applications. | Improved efficiency; issues of field-testing and real-world use persist. |
| Wang et al. (Saudi Arabia, 2021) [31] | Designing an AI-driven road target recognition system for smart city. | Target recognition algorithm design with advanced learning techniques application. | Further testing to manage data diversity on IoT sensors is required. |
| Hernández-Jiménez et al. (Mexico, 2019) [32] | Integrating driving technologies with intelligent road infrastructure | DL models for route decisions through simulation | Insights to develop smart urban roadway systems |
| Habibzadeh et al. (US & Canada, 2018) [33] | Advanced traffic prediction for smart mobility solutions. | ML and data analytics applications. | Despite improvements, managing big, fast-changing data is challenging. |
| Authors (Country 1, Year) | Study Focus | Methodology | Findings and Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|
| Real-time Traffic Monitoring (KST21) | |||
| Puzio et al. (Poland, 2025) [34] | AI and IoT solutions in Polish cities for traffic management. | Empirical approach integrating GIS, big data and ML | Smart systems improve mobility but require better behavioral data use. |
| Ventura et al. (Brazil, 2025) [35] | Comparing anomaly detection models for security reasons. | ML models’ performance in simulated network scenarios. | Validation in real vehicular networks remains limited. |
| Dadheech et al. (India, 2024) [36] | Developing a video analytics system using data from IoT sensors. | DL-based model for quick detection, and sensor fusion. | Enhancing data processing near data source and sensor integration. |
| Moumen et al. (Morocco, 2023) [37] | AI framework using IoT data to optimize road traffic forecasts. | Real-time data collection via IoT sensors analyzed with ML/DL | Improved predictions but traffic variability require further research. |
| Liu et al. (China, 2021) [38] | Developing a low-power road monitoring system for smart cities. | Functional requirements analysis and system architecture design | Efficient data management; further validation for system sustainability. |
| Predictive Analytics (KST22) | |||
| Mrad et al. (Tunisia, 2025) [39] | Exploring AI models to predict short-term motorway traffic data | Data decomposition, feature selection and signal analysis. | Improved predictions; data variability and stability require research. |
| Sheeba and Selvaganesan (India, 2024) [40] | Developing a smart traffic management system. | DL and optimization techniques for traffic management and decision-making | Testing data analysis methods to reduce reliance on centralization. |
| Robinsha and Amutha (India, 2024) [41] | Integrating IoT and ITS. | Designing a Velocious IoT architecture using federated learning to lead smooth travel. | Despite efficiency, issues concern interoperability and scalability. |
| Saleem et al. (Pakistan, 2024) [19] | Making road networks safer, more reliable for less congested in cities. | Using advanced data processing, and AI for traffic management. | 96% accuracy; processing data and cybersecurity require research. |
| Musa et al. (Saudi Arabia, 2023) [42] | Developing a sustainable framework based on IoT and ITS | Combining real-time traffic data, AI sensors, and ML algorithms. | Improved traffic prediction, but issues of data heterogeneity and system integration persist. |
| Huang et al. (China, 2022) [43] | Smart solutions for parking, road systems and traffic management. | Case study and scenario analysis, future trend prediction. | Issues related to energy consumption, data exchange, system updates. |
| Ait Ouallane et al. (Marocco, 2022) [6] | Review recent research on smart urban traffic management system. | Literature review on congestion reduction methods. | Identified gaps to cover future research on sustainability issues. |
| Authors (Country 1, Year) | Study Focus | Methodology | Findings and Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|
| Navigation and Control (KST31) | |||
| Dewi et al. (Taiwan, 2025) [44] | Improving traffic sign detection at night for AVs. | Applying YOLO model and techniques to handle image contrast. | Research needed for real-time, reliable networks, environmental variability, and interoperability. |
| Chen et al. (Taiwan, 2023) [45] | Design road signs for mark detection during the day and at night. | Applying YOLO model and contrast enhancement algorithms. | Issue on lighting and optimization persist. |
| Saleh and Fathy (Egypt, 2023) [46] | Exploring integration of IoT and AI techniques in ITS and AVs | Developing a framework to combine 5G technologies with DL | Despite advances, issues on real-road testing and security persist. |
| Advanced Communication Technologies for AVs (KST32) | |||
| Liu et al. (China, 2023) [47] | Use AI to improve interaction of reality with digital information. | Survey on ITS with 5G networks and AI technologies. | Integration issues in transportation persist. |
| Chen and Lv (2022) [48] | Analyzing performance of the Digital Twins for AVs. | Combining DL and digital twin technology through simulation. | Model achieves 93% accuracy, but extensive validation is needed. |
| Hamza et al. (Saudi Arabia, 2022) [49] | AI-driven system for IoV for smart transportation in urban areas | Network configuration, vehicle communication and route optimization. | Security, data integrity, user privacy, managing costs persist. |
| Mahrez et al. (Morocco, 2022) [50] | Integration of ITS and AI approaches for smart mobility. | Survey of AI-driven ITS supporting urban planning and mobility. | Data privacy, investment, and integration issues pose hurdles. |
| Reebadiya et al. (India, 2021) [51] | AI-enabled sensing and tracking architecture for driving. | Integrating blockchain technology with AI and advanced communication networks | Safer system excels but needs security improvements. |
| Authors (Country 1, Year) | Study Focus | Methodology | Findings and Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autonomous Driving for Crash Prevention (KST41) | |||
| Martínez and Insuasti (Colombia, 2025) [16] | AI application in vehicle license plate recognition. | Systematic literature review from bibliometric databases. | Variations in plate designs and environmental conditions need research. |
| Wang et al. (China, 2025) [52] | Proactive prediction of crashes near intersections. | DL model complemented by data sampling technique. | High accuracy; challenges persist in uneven data distribution and integrating diverse information. |
| Wang et al. (China, 2025) [53] | Assessing wireless communication technology for collision avoidance. | Scenarios analysis to analyze conflicts through simulation. | 38% decrease in traffic conflicts; data loss and security are challenging. |
| Jagatheesaperumal et al. (India, 2024) [54] | Introducing a framework for safe smart cities using AI of Things. | Combining sensors and communication technologies. | Bolstered road safety; sensor reliability and data security are challenging. |
| Djazia et al. (Algeria, 2023) [55] | Developing a smart driver assistance system for crash prediction. | ML and Internet of vehicles. | Enhanced prediction; data privacy and cybersecurity issues persist. |
| Bokolo (Norway, 2023) [56] | Examining senior citizens’ mobility and safety concerns. | Systematic literature review and case studies across countries. | Inclusive initiatives still face gaps in policy implementation. |
| Domínguez and Sanguino (Spain, 2021) [57] | Predicting pedestrian intentions and behaviors near crosswalks. | Identifying safe routes using AI, sensor data, and optimization. | Achieved 99% accuracy, challenges in data variability and sensor limitations remained open. |
| Liu et al. (China, 2020) [58] | Improving urban expressway pattern recognition. | Image processing and AI algorithms | Despite prediction accuracy, further tests in the field should be made. |
| Emergency Response (KST42) | |||
| Pathik et al. (Saudi Arabia, 2022) [59] | Developing a crash detection and rescue system for smart cities. | Using IoT, AI, DL. | Achieved 98% accuracy. Cybersecurity and data privacy issues persist. |
| Authors (Country 1, Year) | Study Focus | Methodology | Findings and Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emissions Reduction (KST51) | |||
| Liu et al. (China, 2025) [9] | Strategies to achieve emission reduction in road transport. | Analysis of measures, practices, and energy system upgrades | Implementation of advancements, regulations, and renewable energy remains complex |
| Rauniyar et al. (Norway, 2023) [60] | Developing a real-time noise and emissions monitoring system. | Cloud-based data collection, AI algorithms for emission classification, and real-world testing. | Hotspots identified; data accuracy and response management pose challenges. |
| Energy Efficiency (KST52) | |||
| Kumar Reddy et al. (India, 2023) [61] | Improving the Quality of Service of traffic using context-aware AI to reduce real-time data transfers | A three-layered learning model with platoon control tested via simulations | Prediction improved (8–24%); managing context migration is challenging. |
| Al-Selwi et al. (Malaysia, 2022) [62] | Investigating the impact of weather data to improve traffic prediction. | Analyzing models with and without weather data to assess performance. | Weather data enhances prediction accuracy; integrating external factors remains complex. |
| Kumar et al. (India, 2020) [63] | Proposing an electric-powered public bus system for smart cities. | Discrete event-based simulation with multi-objective optimization | Reduced waiting times (0.2 to 0.7 min); issues on resource management and security persist. |
| Reid et al. (Mexico, 2018) [64] | Develop an IoT-based system for accurate vehicular detection. | ML and analysis of benchmark studies to assess transport issues. | Accuracy can be achieved; mitigation strategies need further research. |
| Authors (Country 1, Year) | Study Focus | Methodology | Findings and Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Mobility (KST61) | |||
| Yung and Kim (China, 2025) [65] | Studying how AI influences trust and acceptance of AVs. | Data analysis of 392 Chinese vehicle owners. | Trust varies with automation levels; public education and building trust are essential for AV adoption. |
| Issaouı and Selmi (Saudi Arabia, 2025) [66] | AI-powered face mask detection for smart cities. | Using advanced AI methods to detect faces and classify masks, and optimization. | Achieved high accuracy; issues on data and real-world deployment persist |
| Lv et al. (Sweden, 2023) [67] | Physical social intelligence in cyber–physical social ecosystems within the context of smart cities. | Analyzed behavior modeling, AI learning, and adaptation strategies across various sectors. | Behavior modeling advances; security, data techniques, AI integration pose obstacles for development. |
| Kumar et al. (India, 2022) [68] | Developing an IoT-based real-time face mask detection system for smart city public transportation. | Designed hybrid DL and ML models tested on multiple datasets | The proposed model outperformed with error rate of 1.1%, but resource limitations remain a concern. |
| Sepasgozar and Pierre (Canada, 2022) [69] | Traffic prediction using key road features while preserving privacy. | Combining long short-term memory with FL on vehicular network dataset in simulation. | The model predicts accurately, preserves privacy, outperforms other AI algorithms, but faces complexity. |
| Gollapalli et al. (Saudi Arabia, 2022) [70] | Designing an automated traffic control system to minimize user delays. | Utilized IoT sensor data processed on cloud, integrated with Neuro-Fuzzy approach | Simulation achieved 99% accuracy; issues include data integration and system complexity |
| Singh et al. (India, 2021) [71] | Exploring the potential of AI technologies in highway applications through digitalization. | Proposed architecture integrating smart lighting, traffic management, renewable energy, and AI. | Digitalization improves efficiency; challenges include system integration and technology adoption |
| Domínguez et al. (Spain, 2020) [72] | Improving vehicle detection in smart crosswalks using ML models | Trained and tested various ML models with real traffic data from Portugal and Spain. | ML models outperform fuzzy classifiers, but issues related to data variability and model robustness remain. |
| Personalized Services (KST62) | |||
| Ahmed et al. (Malaysia, 2020) [73] | Understanding the factors influencing smart mobility adoption in Malaysia. | Combining advanced statistics and neural networks | Understanding of technology acceptance; behavioral evaluation is key to smart mobility success |
| Authors (Country 1, Year) | Study Focus | Methodology | Findings and Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|
| Predictive Maintenance (KST71) | |||
| Mahmudah et al. (Indonesia, 2025) [12] | Using AI models to automatically detect road damage in real-time | Adjusting YOLO model settings for use on low-power devices. | Fast performance model; scaling and hardware issues persist. |
| Qin and Pournaras (UK, 2023) [74] | Developing an energy-efficient coordination model with drones. | Using decentralized multi-agent collective learning algorithms. | Achieved 46% accuracy; Energy management and reliable communication require further deepening. |
| Hijji et al. (Saudi Arabia, 2023) [75] | Developing an AI-driven hierarchical framework for road maintenance | Using advanced AI models to integrate images and sensors data. | Advanced pothole detection; challenges of real-time deployment. |
| Swarnkar et al. (South Africa, 2023) [76] | Lithium-ion battery health prediction for proactive maintenance | Comparing ML algorithms with modified support vector machine to predict health battery | Reduced error; challenged by complex battery degradation modeling |
| Smart Materials Integration and Performance Analysis (KST72) | |||
| Gabbar et al. (Canada, 2023) [77] | Smart monitoring for real-time road condition inspection | Using sensors, digital signal processing, and AI algorithms | Accurate real-time monitoring; data integration remains challenging. |
| Jagatheesaperumal et al. (India, 2023) [78] | AI acoustic and ultrasonic system for real-time road monitoring. | Hardware design in vehicle rims, data collection, ML algorithms. | Achieved accuracy (99%); real-time processing remains challenging. |
| Liu et al. (USA, 2023) [79] | Developing a multi-task, edge-based sensing system. | Implementing “Sensing as a Service” with cooperative sensing. | Achieved high accuracy; challenges in handling data. |
| Authors (Country 1, Year) | Study Focus | Methodology | Findings and Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innovative Intersection Design through Simulation (KST81) | |||
| Anitha et al. (India, 2024) [80] | Designing road traffic solutions before implementation. | Integrating IoT sensors, AI models, and video/image computing | Accuracy, scalability, and data processing issues need improvement. |
| Cai et al. (China, 2024) [81] | Infrastructure and pedestrian behavior analysis. | ML and image recognition techniques for predictions. | Despite accuracy, data complexity and variability pose challenges. |
| Li et al. (USA, 2023) [82] | Analysis of physical infrastructure attributes (marked crosswalks). | Computer vision and DL on Street View images. | High-visibility crosswalks exist locally, but regional adoption varies. |
| Smart Intersection Management (KST82) | |||
| Aydin et al. (UK, 2023) [83] | Comparing traditional fixed signals vs. AI-driven smart systems. | Data-driven analysis to test camera-based smart intersections. | 16% delays and 20% speed reduction but driver adaptation needs research. |
| Wan and Hwang (Taiwan, 2018) [84] | Managing adaptive isolated intersection signal control. | Applying learning models and microscopic simulation. | Reducing delays by 20%; traffic fluctuations remain a challenge |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tumminello, M.L.; Macioszek, E.; Granà, A. Emerging Cutting-Edge Technologies and Applications for Safer, Sustainable, and Intelligent Road Systems in Smart Cities: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 11583. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111583
Tumminello ML, Macioszek E, Granà A. Emerging Cutting-Edge Technologies and Applications for Safer, Sustainable, and Intelligent Road Systems in Smart Cities: A Review. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(21):11583. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111583
Chicago/Turabian StyleTumminello, Maria Luisa, Elżbieta Macioszek, and Anna Granà. 2025. "Emerging Cutting-Edge Technologies and Applications for Safer, Sustainable, and Intelligent Road Systems in Smart Cities: A Review" Applied Sciences 15, no. 21: 11583. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111583
APA StyleTumminello, M. L., Macioszek, E., & Granà, A. (2025). Emerging Cutting-Edge Technologies and Applications for Safer, Sustainable, and Intelligent Road Systems in Smart Cities: A Review. Applied Sciences, 15(21), 11583. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111583
