Development of Paper Utilizing Miscanthus Pulp Combined with Waste Paper for the Production of Packaging
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Laboratory Brews
2.2. Cellulose Analysis
2.3. Grinding and Preparation of Laboratory Samples
2.4. Mechanical Characteristics
2.5. Microscopy
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Obtaining High-Yield Pulp from Miscanthus
3.2. Development of Modes for Obtaining Chemical–Thermomechanical Mass
3.3. Technology of Obtaining Neutral Sulfite Semi-Cellulose (NSSC)
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Available online: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling/packaging-waste_en?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 1 October 2025).
- Available online: https://sdiopr.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/doc/Ms_JERR_85826.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 1 October 2025).
- Resquin, F.; Fariña, I.; Rachid-Casnati, C.; Rava, A.; Doldán, J.; Hirigoyen, A.; Inderkum, F.; Alen, S.; Olmos, V.M.; Carrasco-Letelier, L. Impact of rotation length of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. on wood production, kraft pulping, and forest value. iForest—Biogeosciences For. 2022, 15, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibson, L.; Lee, T.M.; Koh, L.P.; Brook, B.W.; Gardner, T.A.; Barlow, J.; Peres, C.A.; Bradshaw, C.J.A.; Laurance, W.F.; Lovejoy, T.E.; et al. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 2011, 478, 378–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Y.; Birdsey, R.A.; Fang, J.; Houghton, R.; Kauppi, P.E.; Kurz, W.A.; Phillips, O.L.; Shvidenko, A.; Lewis, S.L.; Canadell, J.G.; et al. A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests. Science 2011, 333, 988–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shambilova, G.K.; Bukanova, A.S.; Kalauova, A.S.; Kalimanova, D.Z.; Abilkhairov, A.I.; Makarov, I.S.; Vinogradov, M.I.; Makarov, G.I.; Yakimov, S.A.; Koksharov, A.V.; et al. An Experimental Study on the Solubility of Betulin in the Complex Solvent Ethanol-DMSO. Processes 2024, 12, 1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baskakov, S.A.; Baskakova, Y.V.; Kabachkov, E.N.; Kichigina, G.A.; Kushch, P.P.; Kiryukhin, D.P.; Krasnikova, S.S.; Badamshina, E.R.; Vasil’ev, S.G.; Soldatenkov, T.A.; et al. Cellulose from Annual Plants and Its Use for the Production of the Films Hydrophobized with Tetrafluoroethylene Telomers. Molecules 2022, 27, 6002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makarov, I.S.; Golova, L.K.; Vinogradov, M.I.; Egorov, Y.E.; Kulichikhin, V.G.; Mikhailov, Y.M. New Hydrated Cellulose Fiber Based on Flax Cellulose. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2022, 91, 1807–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makarov, I.S.; Budaeva, V.V.; Gismatulina, Y.A.; Kashcheyeva, E.I.; Zolotukhin, V.N.; Gorbatova, P.A.; Sakovich, G.V.; Vinogradov, M.I.; Palchikova, E.E.; Levin, I.S.; et al. Preparation of Lyocell Fibers from Solutions of Miscanthus Cellulose. Polymers 2024, 16, 2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.U.; Rehman, A.; Khan, M.A.; Khan, A.R.; Ali, S.; Ahmad, Z. Utilization of non-wood fibers as raw materials for pulp and paper production in Pakistan: A review. Pak. J. For. 2024, 74, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cappelletto, P.; Mongardini, F.; Barberi, B.; Sannibale, M.; Brizzi, M.; Pignatelli, V. Papermaking pulps from the fibrous fraction of Miscanthus × Giganteus. Ind. Crops Prod. 2000, 11, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shavyrkina, N.A.; Budaeva, V.V.; Skiba, E.A.; Gismatulina, Y.A.; Sakovich, G.V. Review of Current Prospects for Using Miscanthus-Based Polymers. Polymers 2023, 15, 3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danielewicz, D.; Surma-Ślusarska, B. Miscanthus × giganteus stalks as a potential non-wood raw material for the pulp and paper industry. Influence of pulping and beating conditions on the fibre and paper properties. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 141, 111744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W.-C.; Kuan, W.-C. Miscanthus as cellulosic biomass for bioethanol production. Biotechnol. J. 2015, 10, 840–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, M.; Choi, G.-W.; Kim, Y.; Koo, B.-C. Bioethanol production by Miscanthus as a lignocellulosic biomass: Focus on high efficiency conversion to glucose and ethanol. BioResources 2011, 6, 1939–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripodi, A.; Belotti, M.; Rossetti, I. Bioethylene Production: From Reaction Kinetics to Plant Design. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 13333–13350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anestis, P.; Vasiliki, K. Utilization of aromatic plants residual biomass after distillation mixed with wood in solid biofuels production. Renew. Energy 2025, 248, 123198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, J.; Lee, K.H.; Lee, T.; Kim, H.S.; Shin, W.H.; Oh, J.-M.; Koo, S.-M.; Yu, B.J.; Yoo, H.Y.; Park, C. Enhanced Production of Bacterial Cellulose from Miscanthus as Sustainable Feedstock through Statistical Optimization of Culture Conditions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danielewicz, D.; Dybka-Stępień, K.; Surma-Ślusarska, B. Processing of Miscanthus × giganteus stalks into various soda and kraft pulps. Part I: Chemical composition, types of cells and pulping effects. Cellulose 2018, 25, 6731–6744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joachimiak, K.; Wojech, R.; Wójciak, A. Comparison of miscanthus giganteus and birch wood nssc pulping part i: The effects of technological conditions on certain pulp properties. Wood Res. 2019, 64, 49–58. [Google Scholar]
- Danielewicz, D.; Surma-Ślusarska, B.; Żurek, G.; Martyniak, D.; Kmiotek, M.; Dybka, K. Selected grass plants as biomass fuels and raw materials for papermaking, Part II. Pulp and paper properties. BioResources 2015, 10, 8552–8564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartler, N. Chemi-Thermo-Mechanical Pulping. In Pulp and Paper Chemistry and Technology, 3rd ed.; Fapet Oy: Helsinki, Finland, 1996; Volume 4 (Mechanical Pulping). [Google Scholar]
- Gismatulina, Y.A. Analysis of the quality of cellulose obtained by a combined method from miscanthus harvested in 2013. Fundam. Res. 2014, 6, 1195–1198. [Google Scholar]
- Tsalagkas, D.; Börcsök, Z.; Pásztory, Z.; Gogate, P.; Csóka, L. Assessment of the papermaking potential of processed Miscanthus × giganteus stalks using alkaline pre-treatment and hydrodynamic cavitation for delignification. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 72, 105462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marín, F.; Sánchez, J.L.; Arauzo, J.; Fuertes, R.; Gonzalo, A. Semichemical pulping of Miscanthus giganteus. Effect of pulping conditions on some pulp and paper properties. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 3933–3940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sixta, H. (Ed.) Handbook of Pulp; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006; p. 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Reimer, C.; Wang, T.; Mohanty, A.K.; Misra, M. Thermal and Mechanical Properties of the Biocomposites of Miscanthus Biocarbon and Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV). Polymers 2020, 12, 1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GOST 16932-93; Pulps. Determination of Dry Matter Content. Russian State Standard: Moscow, Russia, 2023. Available online: https://internet-law.ru/gosts/gost/18959/ (accessed on 1 October 2025). (In Russian)
- GOST 10070-74; Pulp and Semi-Pulp. Method for Determinating Kappa Number. Russian State Standard: Moscow, Russia, 2023. Available online: https://internet-law.ru/gosts/gost/17164/ (accessed on 1 October 2025). (In Russian)
- GOST 14363.4-89; Pulp. Preparation of Samples for Physical and Mechanical Tests. Russian State Standard: Moscow, Russia, 2023. Available online: https://internet-law.ru/gosts/gost/11288/ (accessed on 1 October 2025). (In Russian)
- GOST R 50068-92; Pulps. Determination of Stock Concentration (Rapid Method). Russian State Standard: Moscow, Russia, 2023. Available online: https://internet-law.ru/gosts/gost/19035/ (accessed on 1 October 2025). (In Russian)
- GOST 13523-78; Fibre Semi-Finished Products, Paper and Board. Method for Conditioning of Samples. Russian State Standard: Moscow, Russia, 2023. Available online: https://internet-law.ru/gosts/gost/14918/ (accessed on 1 October 2025). (In Russian)
- GOST 27015-86; Paper and Board. Methods for Determining Thickness, Density and Specific Volume. Russian State Standard: Moscow, Russia, 2024. Available online: https://progost.com/gost/8593 (accessed on 1 October 2025). (In Russian)
- GOST 13525.1-79; Fibre Semimanufactures, Paper and Board. Tensile Strength and Elongation Tests. Russian State Standard: Moscow, Russia, 2023. Available online: https://internet-law.ru/gosts/gost/5617/ (accessed on 1 October 2025). (In Russian)
- GOST 13525.8-86; Fibre Intermediate Products, Paper and Board. Method for Determination of Resistance to Bursting. Russian State Standard: Moscow, Russia, 2023. Available online: https://internet-law.ru/gosts/gost/5667/ (accessed on 1 October 2025). (In Russian)
- GOST 20682-75; Paper for Corrugation. Method for Determining the Resistance of Corrugated Paper to Flat Compression (Concoro Medium Test). Russian State Standard: Moscow, Russia, 2024. Available online: https://internet-law.ru/gosts/gost/16456/ (accessed on 1 October 2025). (In Russian)
- GOST 28686-90; Corrugating Paper. Method for Determination of Corrugating Resistance to Edge Compression. Russian State Standard: Moscow, Russia, 2023. Available online: https://internet-law.ru/gosts/gost/4969/ (accessed on 1 October 2025). (In Russian)
- GOST 10711-97; Paper and Board. Method for Determination of Breaking Force by Ring Compression (RCT). Russian State Standard: Moscow, Russia, 2023. Available online: https://internet-law.ru/gosts/gost/6333/?ysclid=mgtdlpbruz212831294 (accessed on 1 October 2025). (In Russian)
- GOST R ISO 9895-2013; Paper and Cardboard. Determination of Compressive Strength. Short-Distance Test Method Between Clamps. Russian State Standard: Moscow, Russia, 2015. Available online: https://protect.gost.ru/document1.aspx?control=31&baseC=6&page=5&month=5&year=2014&search=&id=185308 (accessed on 1 October 2025). (In Russian)
- Sheikhi, P.; Asadpour, G.; Zabihzadeh, S.M.; Amoee, N. An optimum mixture of virgin bagasse pulp and recycled pulp (OCC) for manufacturing fluting paper. BioResources 2013, 8, 5871–5883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://www.fibrebox.org/corrugated-is-recyclable?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 1 October 2025).
- Sarkhosh Rahmani, F.; Talaeipoor, M. Study on production of fluting paper from wheat straw soda–AQ pulp and OCC pulp blends. Iran. J. Wood Pap. Sci. Res. 2011, 26, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GOST 10700-97; Waste Paper and Board. Specifications. Russian State Standard: Moscow, Russia, 2023. Available online: https://internet-law.ru/gosts/gost/6178/ (accessed on 1 October 2025). (In Russian)







| Variable Mode | Parameter | Cooking Mode |
|---|---|---|
| Cooking mode for HYP from miscanthus | ||
| No. 1 | Cooking time at 160 °C, min | 50 |
| No. 2 | Cooking time at 150 °C, min | 50 |
| No. 3 | Cooking time at 150 °C, min | 30 |
| Hydro module for brewing | 5 | |
| Cooking mode for CTMM from miscanthus | ||
| Duration of treatment at 120 °C, min | 10 | |
| Hydro module for brewing | 5 | |
| Cooking mode for NSSC from miscanthus | ||
| Impregnation at 110 °C, min | 30 | |
| Cooking time at 175 °C, min | 50 | |
| Hydro module for cooking | 7 | |
| Alkali Consumption, % | Total Output of the HYP, % | Kappa Number, Units | pH of Lye After Boiling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooking mode No. 1 | |||
| 4 | 54.0 | 78.0 | 8.0 |
| 6 | 52.0 | 52.0 | 8.3 |
| 8 | 45.9 | 48.4 | 8.7 |
| Cooking mode No. 2 | |||
| 6 | 42.67 | 77.88 | 8.3 |
| 8 | 43.43 | 50.11 | 9.1 |
| 10 | 40.14 | 21.94 | 9.9 |
| 12 | 38.0 | 14.77 | 10.5 |
| Cooking mode No. 3 | |||
| 7 | 52.01 | 70.10 | 10.0 |
| 8 | 50.02 | 49.05 | 10.4 |
| 9 | 46.12 | 35.78 | 11.1 |
| 10 | 40.70 | 26.95 | 12.0 |
| Amount of waste paper, % | 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 |
| Average length, mm | 0.889 | 0.984 | 1.072 | 1.167 | 1.282 |
| Average width, µm | 24.1 | 25.3 | 25.9 | 26.8 | 28.1 |
| Average form factor, % | 89.4 | 88.5 | 88.6 | 88.8 | 85.5 |
| Coarseness | 117 | 165 | 157 | 148 | 158 |
| Average fracture angle | 55.5 | 51.7 | 51.7 | 51.7 | 57.6 |
| Number of fractures per mm | 0.515 | 0.658 | 0.584 | 0.512 | 0.720 |
| Number of major fractures per mm | 0.185 | 0.200 | 0.171 | 0.150 | 0.283 |
| Number of breaks per fiber | 0.410 | 0.553 | 0.514 | 0.476 | 0.705 |
| Number of major kinks per fiber | 0.147 | 0.168 | 0.151 | 0.140 | 0.277 |
| Average fracture index | 1.353 | 1.666 | 1.481 | 1.299 | 1.929 |
| Average segment length | 0.786 | 0.792 | 0.873 | 0.962 | 0.898 |
| Number of vessels in the sample | 27,748 | 12,212 | 10,502 | 9017 | 3939 |
| A share of small change, % | 10.2 | 8.2 | 7.6 | 6.7 | 6.2 |
| Amount of waste paper, % | 0 | 20 | 50 | 80 | 100 |
| Density of casting, g/cm3 | 0.606 | 0.617 | 0.600 | 0.613 | 0.616 |
| Average casting thickness, µm | 197 | 197 | 193 | 197 | 198 |
| P, H | 103 | 102 | 90 | 95 | 81 |
| L, m | 5750 | 5550 | 5200 | 5200 | 4500 |
| CMT, H | 220 | 200 | 170 | 165 | 170 |
| R, kPa | 390 | 375 | 335 | 340 | 320 |
| SCT, kN/m | 3.66 | 3.53 | 3.17 | 3.15 | 2.82 |
| RCT, H | 255 | 235 | 205 | 205 | 190 |
| Tensile stiffness, kN/m | 605 | 606 | 577 | 599 | 542 |
| TEA, J/m2 | 112.8 | 116.6 | 89.5 | 94.2 | 78.0 |
| Stress, MPa | 34.95 | 34.15 | 31.06 | 31.98 | 27.71 |
| Deformation, % | 2.51 | 2.60 | 2.27 | 2.27 | 2.19 |
| E, MPa | 512 | 455 | 460 | 257 | 445 |
| Amount of waste paper, % | 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 |
| Average length, mm | 0.868 | 0.999 | 1.156 | 1.233 | 1.282 |
| Average width, µm | 30.3 | 29.4 | 28.4 | 28.0 | 28.1 |
| Average form factor, % | 89.9 | 89.8 | 89.6 | 89.6 | 85.5 |
| Coarseness | 321 | 345 | 292 | 259 | 158 |
| Average fracture angle | 52.3 | 51.3 | 51.4 | 51.6 | 57.6 |
| Number of fractures per mm | 0.407 | 0.396 | 0.396 | 0.392 | 0.720 |
| Number of major fractures per mm | 0.119 | 0.111 | 0.110 | 0.111 | 0.283 |
| Number of breaks per fiber | 0.313 | 0.326 | 0.359 | 0.371 | 0.705 |
| Number of major kinks per fiber | 0.091 | 0.091 | 0.100 | 0.105 | 0.277 |
| Average fracture index | 1.035 | 1.003 | 1.002 | 0.933 | 0.929 |
| Average segment length | 0.762 | 0.877 | 1.014 | 1.075 | 0.898 |
| Number of vessels in the sample | 11,620 | 8532 | 6416 | 4672 | 3939 |
| Small change share, % | 5.3 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 6.2 |
| Amount of waste paper, % | 0 | 20 | 50 | 80 | 100 |
| Density of casting, g/cm3 | 0.408 | 0.418 | 0.460 | 0.535 | 0.616 |
| Average casting thickness, µm | 291 | 273 | 248 | 221 | 198 |
| P, H | 33.28 | 39.71 | 49.60 | 69.06 | 81.63 |
| L, m | 1870 | 2320 | 2900 | 3890 | 4500 |
| CMT, H | 105 | 110 | 110 | 135 | 170 |
| R, kPa | 70 | 105 | 165 | 245 | 320 |
| SCT, kN/m | 1.72 | 1.80 | 1.92 | 2.39 | 2.82 |
| RCT, H | 93 | 106 | 115 | 130 | 190 |
| Tensile stiffness, kN/m | 330 | 355 | 410 | 505 | 545 |
| TEA, J/m2 | 15.6 | 25.8 | 41.2 | 64.4 | 78.0 |
| Stress, MPa | 7.61 | 9.70 | 13.35 | 20.81 | 27.71 |
| Deformation, % | 1.12 | 1.48 | 1.85 | 2.11 | 2.19 |
| E, MPa | 225 | 150 | 195 | 340 | 445 |
| Alkali Consumption, % | Total Output of the NSSC, % | Kappa Number, Units |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 55.26 | 77.4 |
| 25 | 49.19 | 53.8 |
| Amount of waste paper, % | 0 | 20 | 50 | 80 | 100 |
| Density of casting, g/cm3 | 0.568 | 0.586 | 0.602 | 0.600 | 0.616 |
| Average casting thickness, µm | 206 | 196 | 191 | 189 | 198 |
| P, H | 65 | 66 | 69 | 74 | 81 |
| L, m | 3680 | 3860 | 4000 | 4380 | 4500 |
| CMT, H | 160 | 154 | 151 | 146 | 170 |
| R, kPa | 159 | 171 | 210 | 259 | 320 |
| SCT, kN/m | 2.60 | 2.80 | 2.91 | 2.63 | 2.82 |
| RCT, H | 162 | 153 | 169 | 149 | 190 |
| Tensile stiffness, kN/m | 596 | 574 | 601 | 606 | 542 |
| TEA, J/m2 | 37.2 | 43.3 | 42.4 | 53.3 | 78.0 |
| Stress, MPa | 20.89 | 22.61 | 24.03 | 26.29 | 27.71 |
| Deformation, % | 1.36 | 1.52 | 1.45 | 1.67 | 2.19 |
| E, MPa | 525 | 486 | 566 | 556 | 445 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sevastyanova, Y.; Shcherbak, N.; Potashev, A.; Malkina, S.; Palchikova, E.; Makarov, I.; Kalimanova, D.; Makarov, G.; Levin, I.S.; Shambilova, G.; et al. Development of Paper Utilizing Miscanthus Pulp Combined with Waste Paper for the Production of Packaging. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 11157. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152011157
Sevastyanova Y, Shcherbak N, Potashev A, Malkina S, Palchikova E, Makarov I, Kalimanova D, Makarov G, Levin IS, Shambilova G, et al. Development of Paper Utilizing Miscanthus Pulp Combined with Waste Paper for the Production of Packaging. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(20):11157. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152011157
Chicago/Turabian StyleSevastyanova, Yulia, Natalya Shcherbak, Alexander Potashev, Svetlana Malkina, Ekaterina Palchikova, Igor Makarov, Danagul Kalimanova, Georgy Makarov, Ivan S. Levin, Gulbarshin Shambilova, and et al. 2025. "Development of Paper Utilizing Miscanthus Pulp Combined with Waste Paper for the Production of Packaging" Applied Sciences 15, no. 20: 11157. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152011157
APA StyleSevastyanova, Y., Shcherbak, N., Potashev, A., Malkina, S., Palchikova, E., Makarov, I., Kalimanova, D., Makarov, G., Levin, I. S., Shambilova, G., Shakhmanova, A., Saginayev, A., Kairliyeva, F., & Komarov, I. (2025). Development of Paper Utilizing Miscanthus Pulp Combined with Waste Paper for the Production of Packaging. Applied Sciences, 15(20), 11157. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152011157

