Next Article in Journal
A Finite-Element Model of Seated Human Body Representing the Distribution of Static Pressures and Dynamic Forces over a Rigid Seat During Vertical Vibration for Sitting Postures with Various Thigh Contact
Previous Article in Journal
EEG-Powered UAV Control via Attention Mechanisms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Conventional and Innovative Methods for Reducing the Incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in Milk and Dairy Products
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

From Olive Oil to Pomace: Sustainable Valorization Pathways Linking Food Processing and Human Health

by
Lucia Bubulac
1,
Claudia Florina Bogdan-Andreescu
2,
Daniela Victorița Voica
3,
Bogdan Mihai Cristea
4,*,
Maria Simona Chiș
5,* and
Dan Alexandru Slăvescu
6
1
Department of Family Medicine III, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Eroii Sanitari Boulevard, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Speciality Disciplines, Titu Maiorescu University, 031593 Bucharest, Romania
3
The Romanian Employers Association of Flour Milling, Bakery and Flour Based Products Industry (ROMPAN), 145 Calea Plevnei, 060012 Bucharest, Romania
4
Department of Morphological Sciences, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Eroii Sanitari Boulevard, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
5
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Manăștur Street, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
6
Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 10 Piața 1 Decembrie Street, 410073 Oradea, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(19), 10717; https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910717 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 10 September 2025 / Revised: 1 October 2025 / Accepted: 3 October 2025 / Published: 4 October 2025

Abstract

The olive tree (Olea europaea L.) has been cultivated for millennia, with olive oil representing both a cornerstone of the Mediterranean diet and a major agricultural commodity. Its composition, rich in monounsaturated fatty acids, polyphenols, tocopherols and squalene, supports well-documented cardioprotective, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory benefits. Olive oil production generates substantial secondary streams, including pomace, leaves, pits and mill wastewater, which are rich in phenols, triterpenes and fibers. This review consolidates recent advances in their phytochemical characterization, innovative extraction technologies and health-promoting effects, while highlighting the economic and regulatory prospects for industrial adoption. Comparative analysis shows that olive leaves can produce up to 16,674.0–50,594.3 mg/kg total phenolics; oleuropein 4570.0–27,547.7 mg/kg, pomace retains 2.24 g GAE/100 g dried matrix (DM)total phenolics; oil 13.66% DM; protein 6.64% DM, and wastewater contains high concentration of phenolics content of olives. Innovative extraction techniques, such as ultrasound and microwave-assisted methods, allow for a recovery, while reducing solvent use and energy input. The analysis highlights opportunities for integrating these by-products into circular bioeconomy models, supporting the development of functional foods, nutraceutical applications and sustainable waste management. Future research should address techno-economic feasibility, regulatory harmonization and large-scale clinical validation to accelerate market translation.

1. Introduction

The olive tree (Olea europaea L.) is one of the oldest cultivated plants in the world, with evidence of its domestication tracing back more than 6000 years in the Eastern Mediterranean. Beyond its agricultural significance, the olive tree has historically been a cultural and economic symbol in Mediterranean societies, representing prosperity, peace, and wisdom [1]. Today, olive cultivation has expanded far beyond its native range, reaching regions of America, Australia, and parts of Asia, making olive oil one of the most widely traded vegetable oils globally [2,3].
Olive oil, the primary product obtained from the fruit, is highly valued for its unique sensory properties, nutritional quality, and functional compounds. It is particularly rich in monounsaturated fatty acids, mainly oleic acid, and contains a variety of minor bioactive compounds, including phenolic compounds (hydroxytyrosol, tyrosol, oleocanthal, oleuropein), tocopherol, and squalene, which contribute to its well-documented health benefits [4,5]. These properties support the role of olive oil as a central component of the Mediterranean diet, which has been associated with reduced incidence of cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, and neurodegenerative disorders [6].
The growing global demand for olive oil has, however, intensified the generation of processing by-products, the most notable being olive leaves and olive pomace. Olive leaves, obtained during harvest and pruning, are rich in phenolic compounds such as oleuropein, verbascoside, and luteolin derivatives, with recognized antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and cardioprotective activities [7,8]. Olive pomace, the solid residue from oil extraction, contains a complex mixture of fruit skin, pulp, water, residual oil, and stone fragments. Although historically considered waste, it has been increasingly studied for its valuable content in fiber-bound polyphenols, residual oils rich in unsaturated fatty acids [9].
Valorizing these by-products aligns with the principles of the circular bioeconomy and sustainable food systems, as it reduces environmental impact, reduces disposal costs, and generates high-value ingredients for the food and cosmetic sectors [10]. Moreover, the recovery of bioactive compounds from olive-derived matrices may present synergistic health benefits when used in combination, potentially amplifying antioxidant and antimicrobial responses beyond what individual components can achieve [11].
Despite these opportunities, several challenges remain before the large-scale integration of olive leaves and pomace into commercial applications can be achieved. These include the variability of phytochemical profiles depending on cultivation method, geographical origin, agricultural practices, and processing technology [12].
The global olive oil industry remains a significant agricultural sector, with production reaching approximately 2.7 million tons in 2022. Historically, production has shown substantial growth; world production tripled over the past 60 years, rising from under 1 million tons in the early 1960s to approximately 3 million tons in recent years [13]. According to the International Olive Council (IOC), global output in the 2022/23 crop year totaled about 2.76 million tons, with a projected 7% decline to 2.56 million tons in 2023/24, followed by a rebound to 3.38 million tons in 2024/25 [14].
Production remains highly concentrated geographically. The European Union continues to be the dominant producer, accounting for around 67% of global olive oil production, supported by over 4 million hectares dedicated to cultivation. Spain emerges as the global leader, contributing approximately 24% of total production in 2022, followed by Italy, Greece, and Turkey [13,15]. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the world production of olive and olive oil for 2022.
Despite this scale, extraction efficiency remains limited. Only about 15–25% of the olive fruit mass is converted into oil, meaning that a significant 75–85% becomes by-products, including olive leaves, pomace, and mill wastewater [16]. In traditional three-phase systems, producing 1 L of olive oil can generate up to 4–5 kg of pomace plus around 1–1.5 L of olive mill wastewater [17,18]. This generates enormous quantities of residual biomass globally every year, with considerable environmental implications if not managed properly.
However, these residues are increasingly seen as valuable bioresource streams rather than waste. For example, two-phase extraction systems (which produce a water-rich “alperujo”) reduce wastewater but yield moist semi-solid residues that require thoughtful valorization [19,20]. Efficient recovery strategies, such as composting, extraction of bioactives, or development of functional materials and bioenergy by-products, can contribute to resource efficiency, emission reduction, and circular economy objectives [20,21].
This review aims to go beyond previous studies by integrating technological, economic, and regulatory considerations into a single framework. In contrast to previous analyses that have mainly focused on individual by-products or technical aspects, this article highlights the interconnections between olive oil, pomace, leaves, seeds and wastewater, highlighting their collective potential within a circular bioeconomy model. By synthesizing data on bioactive yield, extraction efficiency, and scalability, this paper provides a comparative perspective that can guide both researchers and industry stakeholders in selecting the most promising valorization strategies.
Relevant literature was extracted from PubMed and Web of Science for the period 2008–2025, using keywords such as “olive oil”, “olive pomace”, “olive leaves”, “olive mill wastewater” and “circular bioeconomy”. Research articles and reviews in English that reported data on phytochemical composition, extraction, health effects or valorization strategies were included.

2. Olive Processing, Extraction, and Product Characteristics

2.1. The Olive Processing Chain

Olive production begins with the cultivation of Olea europaea L., one of the oldest domesticated plants in the Mediterranean [22]. Harvesting typically occurs between October and February, depending on the climate and cultivar [23]. Methods range from traditional hand-picking to mechanized shakers, which improve efficiency but may affect fruit integrity. After harvest, olives are rapidly transported to processing facilities to minimize enzymatic and microbial degradation, which can reduce oil yield and bioactive content [24].
Once at the mill, olives undergo crushing and malaxation, breaking the pulp to release oil. Separation follows via mechanical pressing or centrifugation, producing olive oil as the primary product. Simultaneously, by-products are generated [23]:
Olive leaves, collected during pruning and harvest, represent up to 10% of the orchard biomass;
Olive pomace, the solid residue containing skins, pulp, stones, and residual oil;
Olive mill wastewater, rich in water-soluble phenolics.
Proper management of these by-products is essential for sustainability, as they can be further valorized into nutraceuticals, functional ingredients, or biofuels, reducing environmental burden [25].

2.2. Extraction and Processing Technologies

Various techniques are employed to extract oil and recover bioactive compounds from leaves and pomace. Table 1 summarizes the main methods:
These technologies allow maximization of oil yield, efficient recovery of phenolic compounds, and valorization of by-products, contributing to a circular and sustainable production model.
Traditional methods like cold pressing, centrifugation, or solvent extraction have been used for generations in olive oil production. They are reliable and well-established, but they often come with trade-offs such as lower yields, environmental concerns, or the loss of delicate bioactive compounds. In recent years, modern approaches, like supercritical CO2, ultrasound and microwave-assisted techniques, enzyme treatments, or even simple water-based extractions, have started to reshape the field. These methods are designed not only to improve efficiency and boost the recovery of valuable phenolics, but also to make the process more sustainable. At the same time, innovative technologies such as high-pressure processing, pulsed electric fields, and ozone treatments are being explored to keep products safe, extend shelf life, and protect their nutritional and sensory qualities. Looking even further, tools like nanotechnology and smart packaging offer exciting possibilities for monitoring, valorization, and traceability across the olive oil chain. In short, while traditional extraction methods remain important, it is the combination with modern innovations that truly points the way toward a more sustainable, efficient, and health-focused future for olive oil, its leaves, and pomace.
In conclusion, supercritical CO2 is best suited for lipophilic compounds such as squalene and residual oils, while ultrasound- and microwave-assisted extraction ensure efficient recovery of phenolic compounds from leaves and pomace. Enzyme-assisted methods are optimal for the release of bound bioactives but require further cost optimization, while aqueous extractions are preferable for food-grade oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol-rich products. For scale-up, emerging green technologies such as pulsed electric fields and high-pressure processing offer promising options to balance yield, quality and sustainability.

2.3. Origin and Characteristics of Olive Oil, Leaves, and Pomace

2.3.1. Olive Oil

Olive oil is renowned for its high content of monounsaturated fatty acids, especially oleic acid, which typically constitutes 55–83% of its fatty acid profile. This composition contributes significantly to the oil’s oxidative stability and cardiovascular benefits [13,49]. Beyond lipids, olive oil contains a minor yet biologically potent fraction (1–2%) of phenolics (hydroxytyrosol, tyrosol, oleuropein derivatives), tocopherols, phytosterols, and squalene, which impart antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [49]. Extra Virgin Olive Oil (EVOO) produced exclusively through mechanical means with acidity ≤ 0.8%, retains the highest level of these compounds [49,50]. A recent estimate indicates that only 15–25% of fruit mass is converted into oil, emphasizing the large volume of by-products generated [13].

2.3.2. Olive Leaves

Olive leaves, which represent roughly 10% of olive tree biomass and are often treated as waste, exhibit exceptionally high concentrations of phytochemicals. Among these, oleuropein is the most abundant secoiridoid (524–21.189 mg/kg dry weight), followed by flavonoids, hydroxytyrosol, and triterpenic acids [51]. Drying method impacts the profile: hot-air drying boosts iridoids like oleuropein, while freeze-drying enhances flavonoid and hydroxytyrosol content along with antioxidant activity [51]. For reference, concentrations of total phenolics in leaves are 16.23 mg/g dry weight [52]. These bioactives lend olive leaves antioxidant, antimicrobial, antihypertensive, and metabolic regulatory benefits, making them promising for nutraceutical and cosmetic applications.

2.3.3. Olive Pomace

Olive pomace is the solid residue after oil extraction, typically accounting for 35–45% of processed fruit weight [53]. It comprises pulp, peels, pits, residual oil, and moisture. Notably, two-phase systems yield high-moisture pomace (≈65–70%), while three-phase systems produce drier pomace (≈45%) [50,53]. Pomace has a high content of organic matter, fats, carbohydrates, and water-soluble phenolic substances. It also contains proteins, although its composition comes from lignocellulosic biomass (30–41.6% lignin, 35.3–49.0% cellulose, pectic polymers, hemicelluloses, oils, and minerals). Pomace is rich in phenolic compounds, including hydroxytyrosol (1.8%), oleuropein, verbascoside, and tyrosol, making it a valuable source of bioactives for food preservation or cosmetic use [50,53]. In one study, olive pomace extracts significantly delayed lipid oxidation [54], reinforcing their utility as clean-label antioxidants. The fiber-rich portion (cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin) further supports circular economy strategies and sustainable utilization.

2.3.4. Global Perspective and Circular Valorization

Annually, millions of tons of olive leaves and pomace are produced globally, constituting a substantial environmental burden due to high organic load and phytotoxicity if improperly disposed of. However, increasing efforts toward valorization are transforming these materials into sources of high-value compounds such as natural antioxidants, dietary fibers, and cosmetic ingredients, aligning with circular bioeconomy goals [55]. Comparative analyses emphasize that olive leaves and pomace often contain higher phenolic concentrations than olive oil itself [52], underscoring their potential for sustainable and economic upcycling.

3. Phytochemical Composition

3.1. Olive Oil

Olive oil is the primary product obtained from the fruit of the olive tree and represents a cornerstone of the Mediterranean diet [56]. It is extracted either by mechanical pressing or centrifugation of the olives, producing different grades such as extra virgin, virgin, and refined oils [57].
The composition of olive oil is influenced by factors such as olive cultivar, geographic origin, harvesting time, and processing methods. Its nutritional and functional properties are largely attributed to its fatty acid composition and minor bioactive compounds, including phenolics, tocopherols, squalene, and phytosterols [56,57]. Understanding the detailed phytochemical profile of olive oil is essential to appreciate its health benefits and potential applications in functional foods and nutraceuticals.

3.1.1. Oleic Acid

Oleic acid is the major monounsaturated fatty acid in olive oil, typically constituting 55–83% of total fatty acids. It contributes to the oil’s oxidative stability and cardiovascular protection by lowering LDL cholesterol and modulating systemic inflammation. Its content is affected by the olive cultivar, fruit ripeness, and geographic origin, with late-harvested olives generally providing higher levels [58,59,60].

3.1.2. Linoleic Acid

Linoleic acid is an essential omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid, present in smaller amounts (3–21%). It supports cell membrane integrity and lipid metabolism. Its concentration varies depending on the olive variety and climatic conditions [56].

3.1.3. Hydroxytyrosol

Hydroxytyrosol is a potent antioxidant that protects lipids from oxidation and reduces oxidative stress. Its concentration is highest in extra virgin olive oil and is influenced by processing and storage [7].

3.1.4. Tyrosol

Tyrosol complements hydroxytyrosol antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, contributing to cardiovascular protection. Its levels are sensitive to processing methods [7].

3.1.5. Oleuropein Aglycone

Derived from oleuropein, this secoiridoid shares bitterness and contributes neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects. Levels depend on olive maturity and extraction method [7,49,51].

3.1.6. Oleocanthal

Oleocanthal gives extra virgin olive oil its pungent sensation and possesses anti-inflammatory activity comparable to ibuprofen, with cardioprotective and neuroprotective benefits [61].

3.1.7. Lignans (Pinoresinol, Acetoxypinoresinol)

Lignans contribute to lipid metabolism regulation and exhibit additional antioxidant activity, acting synergistically with other phenolic compounds [62].

3.1.8. α-Tocopherol

Vitamin E protects the oil from oxidation, offers stability and antioxidant benefits to the consumer. Its content varies with olive variety, harvest, and processing [63].

3.1.9. Squalene

Squalene is a triterpene that protects against oxidative damage and supports skin health, with potential antitumor and cardioprotective effects [64].

3.2. Olive Leaves

Olive leaves, often considered an agricultural by-product, are increasingly recognized for their rich content of bioactive compounds. They are collected during pruning or harvesting and can be processed to obtain extracts for nutraceutical, cosmetic, and food applications [65].
The phytochemical profile of olive leaves depends on the olive cultivar, age of the leaf, season, and extraction method, making them a versatile source of antioxidants, anti-inflammatory agents, and other functional molecules [66]. Their valorization aligns with sustainable practices, transforming what was once waste into high-value functional ingredients.

3.2.1. Oleuropein

Oleuropein is the most abundant secoiridoid in olive leaves, typically present at concentrations ranging from 30 to 150 mg/g dry weight. It exhibits potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and cardioprotective effects. Its levels are influenced by leaf age, cultivar, and harvesting season, with younger leaves often containing higher concentrations [67,68].

3.2.2. Verbascoside

Verbascoside, a phenylpropanoid glycoside, contributes additional antioxidant and antimicrobial activity. It is soluble in water and ethanol, and its extraction yield depends on the solvent and method used [69].

3.2.3. Flavonoids (Luteolin, Apigenin, Rutin)

Flavonoids in olive leaves provide anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer effects. Luteolin and apigenin protect against oxidative stress and cellular damage, while rutin contributes to vascular health. Concentrations vary depending on cultivar and season [70].

3.2.4. Phenolic Acids (Caffeic, Ferulic, p-Coumaric Acids)

These acids enhance the antioxidant potential of olive leaves and support liver and cardiovascular health. Though present in smaller amounts compared to oleuropein, they act synergistically with other phenolics to enhance bioactivity [71].

3.2.5. Triterpenoids (Oleanolic, Maslinic Acids)

Triterpenoids in olive leaves provide anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective, and potential antitumor activities. Their levels are influenced by the extraction technique and leaf maturity, with higher concentrations obtained through optimized extraction methods [72].

3.3. Olive Pomace

Olive pomace is the solid residue left after oil extraction, composed of fruit skins, pulp, stone fragments, and residual oil. Historically considered a waste product, pomace is now recognized as a valuable source of bioactive compounds, dietary fiber, and residual lipids. Its composition depends on olive cultivar, fruit ripeness, and extraction method, making it a versatile matrix for nutraceutical, functional food, and cosmetic applications [25,73].
Valorization of olive pomace supports sustainability and circular economy principles by transforming by-products into high-value ingredients.

3.3.1. Residual Lipids (Oleic, Linoleic Acids)

Despite the majority of oil being extracted, pomace retains significant amounts of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Oleic acid remains the most abundant, contributing to cardiovascular health, while linoleic acid supports cell membrane integrity and lipid metabolism [74]. These residual lipids can be recovered and used in functional food formulations or as nutraceutical ingredients.

3.3.2. Hydroxytyrosol and Tyrosol

Phenolic compounds such as hydroxytyrosol and tyrosol are present in both free and fiber-bound forms. Hydroxytyrosol is a strong antioxidant and antimicrobial agent, protecting lipids and proteins from oxidative damage. Tyrosol complements these effects and contributes to cardiovascular protection [75]. The binding of these phenolics to fibers allows for gradual release during digestion, enhancing their bioavailability.

3.3.3. Triterpenoids and Sterols

Minor triterpenoids such as oleanolic and maslinic acids, as well as sterols, persist in pomace and provide anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, and cholesterol-lowering effects. Their concentrations vary depending on cultivar and processing conditions [76].

3.4. Comparative Perspective of Olive by-Products

A comparative approach is essential to identify the most effective strategies for valorizing olive secondary streams. Table 2 summarizes the key differences between olive leaves, pomace, stones and wastewater in terms of bioactive yield, extraction efficiency and economic feasibility. Olive leaves are distinguished by their high oleuropein content and commercial availability, while pomace represents a residue rich in fiber and phenolic compounds, which requires careful handling due to its high moisture content. Olive stones have a lower phenolic yield but offer potential for thermal valorization and biocomposite production, while wastewater from olive mills is exceptionally rich in phenolic compounds but presents handling and regulatory challenges due to its high organic load.

4. Application

4.1. Health/Therapeutic Application

Olive-derived matrices, including olive oil, olive leaves, and olive pomace, have been widely studied for their health-promoting and therapeutic effects. These effects are largely attributed to phenolic compounds, triterpenes, unsaturated fatty acids, and other minor bioactives that modulate oxidative stress, inflammation, immune function, and metabolic pathways [81].

4.1.1. Cardiovascular Protection

Olive oil is strongly associated with cardiovascular benefits [82]. Its monounsaturated fatty acids, particularly oleic acid, improve lipid profiles by lowering LDL cholesterol and increasing HDL cholesterol. Phenolic compounds such as hydroxytyrosol and oleuropein reduce oxidative stress by scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) and preventing LDL oxidation, a key step in atherogenesis. Mechanistically, these compounds also enhance endothelial function by increasing nitric oxide bioavailability, promoting vasodilation and reducing blood pressure. Clinical trials have shown that consumption of polyphenol-rich olive oil reduces systemic inflammation and improves arterial elasticity, contributing to cardiovascular disease prevention [83,84,85,86]. Olive leaves complement these effects through their rich content of oleuropein and flavonoids. These compounds modulate lipid metabolism and reduce inflammatory markers such as TNF-α and IL-6. Oleuropein also inhibits platelet aggregation, reducing thrombosis risk. The combined antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities protect against atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular disorders [71,87]. Olive pomace contains fiber-bound polyphenols and residual oils that support cardiovascular health. The gradual release of polyphenols in the digestive tract provides prolonged antioxidant protection, while pomace fibers contribute to cholesterol regulation and improved lipid metabolism [74].

4.1.2. Anti-Inflammatory Effects

Olive oil phenolics, including oleocanthal, act similarly to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes, reducing pro-inflammatory mediators such as prostaglandins. These effects have been linked to reduced chronic inflammation, which is implicated in cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and neurodegenerative disorders [88,89]. Olive leaf extracts are rich in oleuropein, verbascoside, and luteolin derivatives, which inhibit NF-κB signaling and suppress pro-inflammatory cytokines. These compounds help modulate immune responses and protect tissues from inflammatory damage, with potential benefits in arthritis, metabolic syndrome, and chronic low-grade inflammation [90,91].

4.1.3. Antioxidant Activity

Olive oil is a potent source of antioxidants. Hydroxytyrosol, tyrosol, and oleuropein neutralize ROS, prevent lipid peroxidation, and protect DNA and proteins from oxidative damage. These antioxidant effects reduce the risk of chronic diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular disorders, and neurodegeneration [92]. Olive leaves provide additional antioxidant support. Polyphenols and flavonoids scavenge free radicals and upregulate endogenous antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase. These mechanisms protect cells from oxidative stress-induced apoptosis and maintain cellular homeostasis [93]. Olive pomace, due to its residual polyphenols and fibers, delivers sustained antioxidant effects throughout the gastrointestinal tract. The slow release of bound polyphenols during digestion ensures prolonged protection against oxidative stress and supports overall metabolic health [94].

4.1.4. Metabolic and Antidiabetic Effects

Olive leaf extracts are particularly relevant for glucose regulation. Oleuropein inhibits α-glucosidase and α-amylase enzymes, slowing carbohydrate digestion and reducing postprandial blood glucose spikes. Polyphenols also enhance insulin sensitivity and glucose uptake in peripheral tissues, offering therapeutic potential in type 2 diabetes management [95,96]. Olive oil phenolics contribute by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation, which are key contributors to insulin resistance. Regular intake of polyphenol-rich olive oil has been shown to improve fasting glucose levels and HbA1c in clinical studies [97,98]. Olive pomace fibers support glycemic control by modulating nutrient absorption and acting as prebiotics, which enhance gut microbiota composition and improve metabolic homeostasis [99,100].

4.1.5. Neuroprotective Effects

Phenolic compounds in olive oil and olive leaves have demonstrated neuroprotective effects in preclinical and clinical studies. Hydroxytyrosol and oleuropein reduce neuronal oxidative stress, inhibit neuroinflammation, and modulate pathways involved in amyloid beta aggregation, which is implicated in Alzheimer’s disease. These compounds enhance cognitive function and may slow neurodegenerative progression [101,102].

4.1.6. Anticancer Potential

Olive-derived bioactives may exhibit chemopreventive effects. Olive oil phenolics modulate apoptosis, inhibit angiogenesis, and reduce oxidative DNA damage in cancer cells [103,104]. Olive leaf extracts rich in oleuropein and verbascoside demonstrate antiproliferative effects against various cancer cell lines through cell cycle arrest, ROS modulation, and activation of caspase pathways [105]. Olive pomace polyphenols enhance systemic antioxidant defenses and may synergize with other compounds to reduce tumorigenesis in preclinical models [106].

4.2. Food Applications

Olive-derived matrices are widely employed in the food industry for their multifunctional properties, contributing to preservation, nutritional enhancement, and functional product development. The combination of antioxidants, phenolics, fibers, and unsaturated fatty acids allows olive oil, leaves, and pomace to improve food quality, extend shelf life, and provide biofunctional benefits [53].
The integration of olive oil, leaves, and pomace into diverse food systems highlights their multifunctional roles as natural antioxidants, antimicrobials, and sources of dietary fiber. As summarized in Table 3, olive oil phenolics primarily enhance oxidative stability in lipid-rich matrices, contributing to prolonged shelf life and sensory preservation. Olive leaf extracts, rich in oleuropein and other flavonoids, demonstrate strong antioxidant and antimicrobial effects, particularly effective in dairy and meat products, while also being suitable for functional beverages. Olive pomace, due to its fiber and residual phenolics, has shown promising applications in bakery and cereal products, improving nutritional profiles and exerting prebiotic and anti-inflammatory effects. However, technological challenges such as reduced loaf volume or changes in texture must be considered. Overall, these applications exemplify how olive-derived by-products can simultaneously support sustainable food production and the development of functional, clean-label products.

4.3. Cosmetic Applications

Olive-derived bioactives are also highly valued in cosmetic formulations due to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and skin-protective properties [123].

4.3.1. Olive Oil

Olive oil has long been used in topical applications for its emollient, moisturizing, and protective properties. Its phenolics, tocopherols, and squalene act as antioxidants, protecting skin from oxidative stress induced by UV exposure and pollution.
Mechanistically, hydroxytyrosol and oleuropein neutralize ROS in skin cells, preventing lipid peroxidation in cell membranes and reducing photoaging [124]. Cosmetic applications include creams, serums, lip balms, and sunscreens enriched with phenolic extracts for anti-aging and protective benefits [123].

4.3.2. Olive Leaves

Olive leaf extracts provide potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects in topical formulations. Oleuropein and verbascoside inhibit ROS formation, reduce cytokine-mediated inflammation, and protect against skin damage caused by UV radiation and environmental pollutants [125].
Mechanistically, these compounds upregulate endogenous antioxidant enzymes and inhibit NF-κB signaling in keratinocytes and fibroblasts, reducing inflammatory mediators and promoting skin repair. Olive leaf extracts are incorporated into facial masks, lotions, and serums targeting anti-aging, soothing, and skin barrier support [126].

4.3.3. Olive Pomace

Olive pomace is increasingly used in cosmetic products due to its phenolic content and moisturizing fibers. Polyphenols act as antioxidants, protecting skin cells from oxidative damage, while fibers can enhance texture and hydration in creams and exfoliants [123].
Mechanistically, pomace extracts scavenge free radicals, modulate inflammatory pathways, and improve skin elasticity by promoting collagen synthesis. Applications include anti-aging creams, facial scrubs that leverage the sustained release of bioactive compounds from pomace matrices [127,128].
To provide an integrated overview, Figure 3 summarizes the multifunctional role of olive-derived matrices, correlating their phytochemical richness with both health effects and practical applications. As illustrated, bioactive compounds such as phenols, flavonoids and triterpenoids exert antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, neuroprotective, antidiabetic, antimicrobial and anticarcinogenic activities, supporting their therapeutic potential. At the same time, these properties allow for widespread applications in the food, cosmetic and packaging sectors, where olive oil, leaves and pomace are increasingly used as natural preservatives, functionality enhancers and agents. This figure highlights the dual importance of olive by-products as health-promoting agents and as valuable raw materials for innovative industrial uses, thus strengthening their contribution to both human well-being and circular bioeconomy strategies.

5. Conclusions

Olive oil, leaves and pomace represent a highly interconnected system within the olive processing chain, providing a broad spectrum of bioactive compounds with significant potential for health, nutrition and technology. Olive oil remains the main product, rich in monounsaturated fatty acids, phenolic compounds, tocopherols and squalene, and serves as the cornerstone of the Mediterranean diet due to its cardioprotective, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Olive leaves and pomace, historically considered by-products, are increasingly recognized as valuable sources of polyphenols, triterpenes and dietary fiber, supporting applications in functional foods, cosmetics and emerging biofilm-based packaging. Advances in eco-friendly extraction technologies, including supercritical CO2, ultrasound-assisted and enzyme-assisted methods, allow for the selective recovery of bioactives while reducing environmental impact, and integrated olive biorefineries offer a sustainable framework that aligns with the principles of the circular economy.
Despite these opportunities, several limitations must be acknowledged. Current evidence is largely based on in vitro or animal studies, while large-scale human clinical trials remain limited, making it difficult to fully validate health claims. Furthermore, the phytochemical composition of olive-derived matrices is highly variable, influenced by variety, geographical origin, agricultural practices and processing methods, complicating reproducibility and industrial scalability. Regulatory frameworks also differ substantially across jurisdictions, with inconsistent approaches to safety assessment and approval of functional ingredients, creating barriers to market adoption.
Therefore, future research should address these gaps by conducting life cycle assessments of valorization technologies to quantify environmental and economic impacts, examining regulatory compliance and safety assessments in different jurisdictions, and developing pilot and industrial-scale case studies to compare costs, yields, and sustainability outcomes. Coordinated international efforts to harmonize regulatory standards and validate bioactivity claims through well-designed clinical trials will be essential. By integrating these critical aspects, the valorization of olive oil, leaves, and pomace can progress from experimental studies to large-scale applications, promoting both human health and the goals of a circular bioeconomy. Future research should also explore economic feasibility, regulatory frameworks and comparisons with other agro-industrial by-products to better situate the valorization of olive by-products within the wider circular bioeconomy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.B., D.V.V. and M.S.C.; methodology, C.F.B.-A. and D.V.V.; data curation, B.M.C., L.B. and D.A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.B., M.S.C., B.M.C. and D.V.V.; writing—review and editing, L.B., C.F.B.-A. and B.M.C.; visualization, M.S.C., L.B. and D.V.V.; supervision, L.B., M.S.C. and D.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Schicchi, R.; Speciale, C.; Amato, F.; Bazan, G.; Di Noto, G.; Marino, P.; Ricciardo, P.; Geraci, A. The Monumental Olive Trees as Biocultural Heritage of Mediterranean Landscapes: The Case Study of Sicily. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Besnard, G.; Terral, J.-F.; Cornille, A. On the origins and domestication of the olive: A review and perspectives. Ann. Bot. 2017, 121, 385–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rugini, E.; Mencuccini, M.; Biasi, R.; Altamura, M.M. Olive (Olea europaea L.). In Protocol for Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants; Jain, S.M., Gupta, P.K., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 345–360. [Google Scholar]
  4. Covas, M.-I.; Konstantinidou, V.; Fitó, M. Olive Oil and Cardiovascular Health. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2009, 54, 477–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yubero-Serrano, E.; Lopez-Moreno, J.; Gomez-Delgado, F.; Lopez-Miranda, J. Extra virgin olive oil: More than a healthy fat. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 72, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Riolo, R.; De Rosa, R.; Simonetta, I.; Tuttolomondo, A. Olive Oil in the Mediterranean Diet and Its Biochemical and Molecular Effects on Cardiovascular Health through an Analysis of Genetics and Epigenetics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 16002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ghanbari, R.; Anwar, F.; Alkharfy, K.M.; Gilani, A.-H.; Saari, N. Valuable Nutrients and Functional Bioactives in Different Parts of Olive (Olea europaea L.)—A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 3291–3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Talhaoui, N.; Taamalli, A.; Caravaca, A.M.G.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, A.; Segura Carretero, A. Phenolic compounds in olive leaves: Analytical determination, biotic and abiotic influence, and health benefits. Food Res. Int. 2015, 77, 92–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ribeiro, T.B.; Oliveira, A.L.; Costa, C.; Nunes, J.; Vicente, A.A.; Pintado, M. Total and Sustainable Valorisation of Olive Pomace Using a Fractionation Approach. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ravindran, R.; Jaiswal, A.K. Exploitation of Food Industry Waste for High-Value Products. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, Y.; Kim, W.J.; Wang, S.C.; Nitin, N. Synergistic antimicrobial activities of phenolic-rich extract derived from olive pomace and UV-A light against bacterial pathogens and their biofilms. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2025, 10, 101071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nunes, M.; Pimentel, F.; Costa, A.; Alves, R.; Oliveira, M. Olive by-products for functional and food applications: Challenging opportunities to face environmental constraints. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. FAOSTAT. 2022. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed on 20 August 2025).
  14. IOC. IOC Statistics Dashboard. 2022–2025. Available online: www.internationaloliveoil.org/what-we-do/statistics/ (accessed on 15 August 2025).
  15. Europeancommission. Olive Oil in the EU. An Overview of the Production and Marketing of Olive Oil in the EU. Available online: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/farming/crop-productions-and-plant-based-products/olive-oil_en (accessed on 25 August 2025).
  16. Dammak, I.; Neves, M.; Souilem, S.; Isoda, H.; Sayadi, S.; Nakajima, M. Material Balance of Olive Components in Virgin Olive Oil Extraction Processing. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2015, 21, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mohammadnejad, P.; Haghbeen, K.; Rasouli, H. Treatment and Valorization of Olive Mill Wastewater; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  18. Enaime, G.; Dababat, S.; Wichern, M.; Lübken, M. Olive mill wastes: From wastes to resources. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 20853–20880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fernández-Rodríguez, M.J.; de la Lama-Calvente, D.; García-González, M.; Moreno-Fernández, J.; Jiménez-Rodríguez, A.; Borja, R.; Rincón-Llorente, B. Integral Valorization of Two-Phase Olive Mill Solid Waste (OMSW) and Related Washing Waters by Anaerobic Co-digestion of OMSW and the Microalga Raphidocelis subcapitata Cultivated in These Effluents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 3219–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fernández-Hernández, A.; Civantos, C.; Roig, A.; Sánchez-Monedero, M. Compost prepared with two phase olive mill waste “alperujo” as growing media. Acta Hortic. 2013, 1013, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sygouni, V.; Pantziaros, A.G.; Iakovides, I.C.; Sfetsa, E.; Bogdou, P.I.; Christoforou, E.A.; Paraskeva, C.A. Treatment of Two-Phase Olive Mill Wastewater and Recovery of Phenolic Compounds Using Membrane Technology. Membranes 2019, 9, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Barazani, O.; Dag, A.; Dunseth, Z. The history of olive cultivation in the southern Levant. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1131557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khdair, A.; Abu-Rumman, G. Sustainable Environmental Management and Valorization Options for Olive Mill Byproducts in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region. Processes 2020, 8, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ahmad, R.; Ayoub, S. A comparative study of hand-held harvesting machine with traditional methods used for olive harvesting in jordan. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of Olivebioteq 2014, Amman, Jordan, 3–6 November 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dantas Palmeira, J.; Araújo, D.; C. Mota, C.; Alves, R.C.; P. P. Oliveira, M.B.; Ferreira, H.M.N. Fermentation as a Strategy to Valorize Olive Pomace, a By-Product of the Olive Oil Industry. Fermentation 2023, 9, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fernández-Prior, Á.; Cardoso, J.C.; Bermúdez-Oria, A.; Reyes, Á.T.; Fernández-Bolaños, J.; Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, G. Application of a Cold-Pressing Treatment to Improve Virgin Olive Oil Production and the Antioxidant Phenolic Profile of Its by-Products. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bouknana, D.; Serghini Caid, H.; Hammouti, B.; Rmili, R.; Hamdani, I. Diagnostic study of the olive oil industry in the Eastern region of Morocco. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45, 7782–7788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cravotto, C.; Fabiano-Tixier, A.S.; Claux, O.; Rapinel, V.; Tomao, V.; Stathopoulos, P.; Skaltsounis, A.L.; Tabasso, S.; Jacques, L.; Chemat, F. Higher Yield and Polyphenol Content in Olive Pomace Extracts Using 2-Methyloxolane as Bio-Based Solvent. Foods 2022, 11, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kyriakoudi, A.; Mourtzinos, I.; Tyśkiewicz, K.; Milovanovic, S. An Eco-Friendly Supercritical CO2 Recovery of Value-Added Extracts from Olea europaea Leaves. Foods 2024, 13, 1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bartella, L.; Mazzotti, F.; Talarico, I.R.; Santoro, I.; Di Donna, L. Hydroxytyrosol-Fortified Foods Obtained by Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Olive Oil. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Martín-García, B.; De Montijo-Prieto, S.; Jiménez-Valera, M.; Carrasco-Pancorbo, A.; Ruiz-Bravo, A.; Verardo, V.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M. Comparative Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Olive Leaves Using a Sonotrode and an Ultrasonic Bath and the Evaluation of Both Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Niknam, S.M.; Kashaninejad, M.; Escudero, I.; Sanz, M.T.; Beltrán, S.; Benito, J.M. Valorization of olive mill solid residue through ultrasound-assisted extraction and phenolics recovery by adsorption process. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 316, 128340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cifá, D.; Skrt, M.; Pittia, P.; Di Mattia, C.; Poklar Ulrih, N. Enhanced yield of oleuropein from olive leaves using ultrasound-assisted extraction. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 1128–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Şahin, S.; Samli, R.; Tan, A.S.B.; Barba, F.J.; Chemat, F.; Cravotto, G.; Lorenzo, J.M. Solvent-Free Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Polyphenols from Olive Tree Leaves: Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties. Molecules 2017, 22, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Boli, E.; Prinos, N.; Louli, V.; Pappa, G.; Stamatis, H.; Magoulas, K.; Voutsas, E. Recovery of Bioactive Extracts from Olive Leaves Using Conventional and Microwave-Assisted Extraction with Classical and Deep Eutectic Solvents. Separations 2022, 9, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Macedo, G.A.; Santana, Á.L.; Crawford, L.M.; Wang, S.C.; Dias, F.F.G.; de Moura Bell, J.M.L.N. Integrated microwave- and enzyme-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from olive pomace. LWT 2021, 138, 110621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sharma, R.; Sharma, P.C.; Rana, J.; Joshi, V. Improving the Olive Oil Yield and Quality Through Enzyme-Assisted Mechanical Extraction, Antioxidants and Packaging. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2014, 39, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chih, H.J.; James, A.P.; Jayasena, V.; Dhaliwal, S.S. Addition of enzymes complex during olive oil extraction improves oil recovery and bioactivity of Western Australian Frantoio olive oil. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 1222–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hadj-Taieb, N.; Grati, N.; Ayadi, M.; Attia, I.; Bensalem, H.; Gargouri, A. Optimisation of olive oil extraction and minor compounds content of Tunisian olive oil using enzymatic formulations during malaxation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2012, 62, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Goldsmith, C.D.; Vuong, Q.V.; Stathopoulos, C.E.; Roach, P.D.; Scarlett, C.J. Optimization of the Aqueous Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Olive Leaves. Antioxidants 2014, 3, 700–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Hernandez Fernandez, A.; Garrido, Y.; López, E.; De los Ríos, A.; Quesada-Medina, J.; Hernández-Fernández, F. Recovering Polyphenols in Aqueous Solutions from Olive Mill Wastewater and Olive Leaf for Biological Applications. Processes 2023, 11, 2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Olmo-Cunillera, A.; Ribas-Agustí, A.; Lozano-Castellón, J.; Pérez, M.; Ninot, A.; Romero-Aroca, A.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M.; Vallverdú-Queralt, A. High hydrostatic pressure enhances the formation of oleocanthal and oleacein in ‘Arbequina’ olive fruit. Food Chem. 2024, 437, 137902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dias, S.; Pino-Hernández, E.; Gonçalves, D.; Rego, D.; Redondo, L.; Alves, M. Challenges and Opportunities for Pilot Scaling-Up Extraction of Olive Oil Assisted by Pulsed Electric Fields: Process, Product, and Economic Evaluation. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 3638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Güngör, F.Ö.; Ocak, Ö.Ö.; Ünal, M.K. Effect of ozone treatment on the physical, microbiological and sensorial properties of Spanish-style table olives. Grasas Aceites 2020, 71, e348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. López-García, E.; Romero-Gil, V.; Arroyo-López, F.N.; Benítez-Cabello, A. Impact of lactic acid bacteria inoculation on fungal diversity during Spanish-style green table olive fermentations. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2024, 417, 110689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mitrea, L.; Teleky, B.-E.; Plosca, M.-P.; Nemes, S.-A.; Pascuta, M.-S.; Ranga, F.; Leopold, L.; Martău, A.-G.; Călinoiu, L.-F.; Ștefănescu, B.-E.; et al. Enhancing eco-friendly coatings: Aqueous olive leaves extract fortifies macroalgae-based packaging materials. LWT 2024, 209, 116805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. El-Sayed, S.M.; El-Sayed, H.S.; Hashim, A.F.; Youssef, A.M. Valorization of edible films based on chitosan/hydroxyethyl cellulose/olive leaf extract and TiO2-NPs for preserving sour cream. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 268, 131727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vitaskos, V.; Demestichas, K.; Karetsos, S.; Costopoulou, C. Blockchain and Internet of Things Technologies for Food Traceability in Olive Oil Supply Chains. Sensors 2024, 24, 8189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jimenez-Lopez, C.; Carpena, M.; Lourenço-Lopes, C.; Gallardo-Gomez, M.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Barba, F.J.; Prieto, M.A.; Simal-Gandara, J. Bioactive Compounds and Quality of Extra Virgin Olive Oil. Foods 2020, 9, 1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Safarzadeh Markhali, F. Effect of Processing on Phenolic Composition of Olive Oil Products and Olive Mill By-Products and Possibilities for Enhancement of Sustainable Processes. Processes 2021, 9, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Xin, X.; Zhu, S.; Niu, E.; Wu, Q.; Li, T.; Liu, D. Changes in Phytochemical Profiles and Biological Activity of Olive Leaves Treated by Two Drying Methods. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 854680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, C.; Xin, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, S.; Niu, E.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, D. Comparative Evaluation of the Phytochemical Profiles and Antioxidant Potentials of Olive Leaves from 32 Cultivars Grown in China. Molecules 2022, 27, 1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Otero, P.; Garcia-Oliveira, P.; Carpena, M.; Barral-Martinez, M.; Chamorro, F.; Echave, J.; Garcia-Perez, P.; Cao, H.; Xiao, J.; Simal-Gandara, J.; et al. Applications of by-products from the olive oil processing: Revalorization strategies based on target molecules and green extraction technologies. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 116, 1084–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Antónia Nunes, M.; Costa, A.S.G.; Bessada, S.; Santos, J.; Puga, H.; Alves, R.C.; Freitas, V.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P. Olive pomace as a valuable source of bioactive compounds: A study regarding its lipid- and water-soluble components. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 644, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dermeche, S.; Nadour, M.; Larroche, C.; Moulti-Mati, F.; Michaud, P. Olive mill wastes: Biochemical characterizations and valorization strategies. Process Biochem. 2013, 48, 1532–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fatoki, T.H.; Akintayo, C.O.; Ibraheem, O. Bioinformatics exploration of olive oil: Molecular targets and properties of major bioactive constituents. OCL 2021, 28, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Seidita, A.; Soresi, M.; Giannitrapani, L.; Di Stefano, V.; Citarrella, R.; Mirarchi, L.; Cusimano, A.; Augello, G.; Carroccio, A.; Iovanna, J.L.; et al. The clinical impact of an extra virgin olive oil enriched mediterranean diet on metabolic syndrome: Lights and shadows of a nutraceutical approach. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 980429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pastor, R.; Bouzas, C.; Tur, J.A. Beneficial effects of dietary supplementation with olive oil, oleic acid, or hydroxytyrosol in metabolic syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2021, 172, 372–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rodrigues, N.; Casal, S.; Pinho, T.; Cruz, R.; Peres, A.M.; Baptista, P.; Pereira, J.A. Fatty Acid Composition from Olive Oils of Portuguese Centenarian Trees Is Highly Dependent on Olive Cultivar and Crop Year. Foods 2021, 10, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. El Qarnifa, S.; El Antari, A.; Hafidi, A. Effect of Maturity and Environmental Conditions on Chemical Composition of Olive Oils of Introduced Cultivars in Morocco. J. Food Qual. 2019, 2019, 1854539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. González-Rodríguez, M.; Ait Edjoudi, D.; Cordero-Barreal, A.; Farrag, M.; Varela-García, M.; Torrijos-Pulpón, C.; Ruiz-Fernández, C.; Capuozzo, M.; Ottaiano, A.; Lago, F.; et al. Oleocanthal, an Antioxidant Phenolic Compound in Extra Virgin Olive Oil (EVOO): A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Its Potential in Inflammation and Cancer. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. López-Biedma, A.; Sánchez-Quesada, C.; Delgado-Rodríguez, M.; Gaforio, J.J. The biological activities of natural lignans from olives and virgin olive oils: A review. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 26, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zeng, Q.; Deng, Y.; Xie, P.; Zhang, C.; Huang, L. A new insight into synergistic effects between endogenous phenolic compounds additive and α-tocopherol for the stability of olive oil. Food Chem. 2023, 427, 136667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pacetti, D.; Scortichini, S.; Boarelli, M.C.; Fiorini, D. Simple and rapid method to analyse squalene in olive oils and extra virgin olive oils. Food Control 2019, 102, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zantedeschi, S.; Valenti, F.; Maraldi, M.; Martinez, G.A.; Tura, M.; Valli, E.; Gallina Toschi, T. Effect of blending olive leaves and olive mill wastewater on the potential biogas production. Biomass Bioenergy 2025, 202, 108201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Şahin, S.; Bilgin, M. Olive tree (Olea europaea L.) leaf as a waste by-product of table olive and olive oil industry: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Barbaro, B.; Toietta, G.; Maggio, R.; Arciello, M.; Tarocchi, M.; Galli, A.; Balsano, C. Effects of the olive-derived polyphenol oleuropein on human health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 18508–18524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kalaycıoğlu, Z.; Kopar, M.; Erim, F.B. Oleuropein levels of Anatolian olive leaves and correlated antioxidant, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory activities. J. Chem. Metrol. 2020, 14, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Marčetić, M.; Bufan, B.; Drobac, M.; Antić Stanković, J.; Arsenović Ranin, N.; Milenković, M.T.; Božić, D.D. Multifaceted Biological Properties of Verbascoside/Acteoside: Antimicrobial, Cytotoxic, Anti-Inflammatory, and Immunomodulatory Effects. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ginwala, R.; Bhavsar, R.; Chigbu, D.G.I.; Jain, P.; Khan, Z.K. Potential Role of Flavonoids in Treating Chronic Inflammatory Diseases with a Special Focus on the Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Apigenin. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lockyer, S.; Yaqoob, P.; Spencer, J.P.E.; Rowland, I. Olive leaf phenolics and cardiovascular risk reduction: Physiological effects and mechanisms of action. Nutr. Aging 2012, 1, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. López-Salas, L.; Expósito-Almellón, X.; Valencia-Isaza, A.; Fernández-Arteaga, A.; Quirantes-Piné, R.; Borrás-Linares, I.; Lozano-Sánchez, J. Eco-Friendly Extraction of Olive Leaf Phenolics and Terpenes: A Comparative Performance Analysis Against Conventional Methods. Foods 2025, 14, 3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rodríguez-Pérez, M.; García-Béjar, B.; Burgos-Ramos, E.; Silva, P. Valorization of Olive Oil and Wine Industry Byproducts: Challenges and Opportunities in Sustainable Food Applications. Foods 2025, 14, 2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. González-Rámila, S.; Sarriá, B.; Seguido, M.; García-Cordero, J.; Bravo-Clemente, L.; Mateos, R. Effect of Olive Pomace Oil on Cardiovascular Health and Associated Pathologies. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Greco, M.; Fuertes-Rabanal, M.; Frey, C.; Grosso, C.D.; Coculo, D.; Moretti, P.; Saldarelli, P.; Agresti, S.; Caliandro, R.; Mélida, H.; et al. Phenolic compounds-enriched extract recovered from two-phase olive pomace serves as plant immunostimulants and broad-spectrum antimicrobials against phytopathogens including Xylella fastidiosa. Plant Stress 2024, 14, 100655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Claro-Cala, C.M.; Quintela, J.C.; Pérez-Montero, M.; Miñano, J.; Alvarez de Sotomayor, M.; Herrera, M.D.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, R. Pomace Olive Oil Concentrated in Triterpenic Acids Restores Vascular Function, Glucose Tolerance and Obesity Progression in Mice. Nutrients 2020, 12, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ugolini, T.; Cecchi, L.; Sani, G.; Digiglio, I.; Adinolfi, B.; Ciaccheri, L.; Zanoni, B.; Melani, F.; Mulinacci, N. Seasonal and Cultivar-Dependent Phenolic Dynamics in Tuscan Olive Leaves: A Two-Year Study by HPLC-DAD-MS for Food By-Product Valorization. Separations 2025, 12, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ünlü, A.E. Green and Non-conventional Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Olive Leaves: Screening of Novel Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents and Investigation of Process Parameters. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 12, 5329–5346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Castillo-Rivas, A.; Álvarez-Mateos, P.; García-Martín, J.F. Revalorization of Olive Stones from Olive Pomace: Phenolic Compounds Obtained by Microwave-Assisted Extraction. Agronomy 2025, 15, 1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Soares, T.F.; Alves, R.C.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P. From Olive Oil Production to By-Products: Emergent Technologies to Extract Bioactive Compounds. Food Rev. Int. 2024, 40, 3342–3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Garrido-Romero, M.; Díez-Municio, M.; Moreno, F.J. Exploring the Impact of Olive-Derived Bioactive Components on Gut Microbiota: Implications for Digestive Health. Foods 2025, 14, 2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Xia, M.; Zhong, Y.; Peng, Y.; Qian, C. Olive oil consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1041203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Salvo, A.; Tuttolomondo, A. The Role of Olive Oil in Cardiometabolic Risk. Metabolites 2025, 15, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Morvaridzadeh, M.; Alami, M.; Zoubdane, N.; Sidibé, H.; Berrougui, H.; Fülöp, T.; Nguyen, M.; Khalil, A. High-Tyrosol/Hydroxytyrosol Extra Virgin Olive Oil Enhances Antioxidant Activity in Elderly Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Huang, Y.; He, W.; Zhao, M.; McClements, D.J.; Xu, Y.; Li, L.; Dong, W.; Hu, X.; Li, C. Unraveling the Health Contributions of Five Key Bioactives in Virgin Olive Oil: A Dose-Based Comparative Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 105274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Xin, Q.; Yuan, R.; Miao, Y.; Yang, M.; Mo, H.; Chen, K.; Cong, W. Protective effects of oleic acid and polyphenols in extra virgin olive oil on cardiovascular diseases. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2024, 13, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Razmpoosh, E.; Abdollahi, S.; Mousavirad, M.; Clark, C.C.T.; Soltani, S. The effects of olive leaf extract on cardiovascular risk factors in the general adult population: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2022, 14, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tamburini, B.; Di Liberto, D.; Pratelli, G.; Rizzo, C.; Barbera, L.L.; Lauricella, M.; Carlisi, D.; Maggio, A.; Palumbo Piccionello, A.; D’Anneo, A.; et al. Extra Virgin Olive Oil Polyphenol-Enriched Extracts Exert Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effects on Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells from Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Carpi, S.; Scoditti, E.; Massaro, M.; Polini, B.; Manera, C.; Digiacomo, M.; Esposito Salsano, J.; Poli, G.; Tuccinardi, T.; Doccini, S.; et al. The Extra-Virgin Olive Oil Polyphenols Oleocanthal and Oleacein Counteract Inflammation-Related Gene and miRNA Expression in Adipocytes by Attenuating NF-κB Activation. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Silvestrini, A.; Giordani, C.; Bonacci, S.; Giuliani, A.; Ramini, D.; Matacchione, G.; Sabbatinelli, J.; Di Valerio, S.; Pacetti, D.; Procopio, A.D.; et al. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Olive Leaf Extract and Its Bioactive Compounds Oleacin and Oleuropein-Aglycone on Senescent Endothelial and Small Airway Epithelial Cells. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ben Attia, T.; Bahri, S.; Ben Younes, S.; Nahdi, A.; Ben Ali, R.; Bel Haj Kacem, L.; El May, M.V.; López-Maldonado, E.A.; Mhamdi, A. In-Depth Analysis of Olea europaea L. Leaf Extract: Alleviating Pulmonary Histological Disturbances, Pro-Inflammatory Responses, and Oxidative Stress from Isolated or Combined Exposure to Inhaled Toluene and Noise in Rats. Biology 2024, 13, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Karković Marković, A.; Torić, J.; Barbarić, M.; Jakobušić Brala, C. Hydroxytyrosol, Tyrosol and Derivatives and Their Potential Effects on Human Health. Molecules 2019, 24, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Assar, D.H.; Ragab, A.E.; Abdelsatar, E.; Salah, A.S.; Salem, S.M.R.; Hendam, B.M.; Al Jaouni, S.; Al Wakeel, R.A.; AbdEl-Kader, M.F.; Elbialy, Z.I. Dietary Olive Leaf Extract Differentially Modulates Antioxidant Defense of Normal and Aeromonas hydrophila-Infected Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) via Keap1/Nrf2 Pathway Signaling: A Phytochemical and Biological Link. Animals 2023, 13, 2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Radić, K.; Vinković Vrček, I.; Pavičić, I.; Čepo, D.V. Cellular Antioxidant Activity of Olive Pomace Extracts: Impact of Gastrointestinal Digestion and Cyclodextrin Encapsulation. Molecules 2020, 25, 5027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hadrich, F.; Bouallagui, Z.; Junkyu, H.; Isoda, H.; Sayadi, S. The α-Glucosidase and α-Amylase Enzyme Inhibitory of Hydroxytyrosol and Oleuropein. J. Oleo Sci. 2015, 64, 835–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hadrich, F.; Mahmoudi, A.; Chamkha, M.; Isoda, H.; Sayadi, S. Olive Leaves Extract and Oleuropein Improve Insulin Sensitivity in 3T3-L1 Cells and in High-Fat Diet-Treated Rats via PI3K/AkT Signaling Pathway. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2023, 2023, 6828230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Santangelo, C.; Filesi, C.; Varì, R.; Scazzocchio, B.; Filardi, T.; Fogliano, V.; D’Archivio, M.; Giovannini, C.; Lenzi, A.; Morano, S.; et al. Consumption of extra-virgin olive oil rich in phenolic compounds improves metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A possible involvement of reduced levels of circulating visfatin. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2016, 39, 1295–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Liva, K.; Panagiotopoulos, A.A.; Foscolou, A.; Amerikanou, C.; Vitali, A.; Zioulis, S.; Argyri, K.; Panoutsopoulos, G.I.; Kaliora, A.C.; Gioxari, A. High Polyphenol Extra Virgin Olive Oil and Metabolically Unhealthy Obesity: A Scoping Review of Preclinical Data and Clinical Trials. Clin. Pract. 2025, 15, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ribeiro, T.B.; Costa, C.M.; Bonifácio-Lopes, T.; Silva, S.; Veiga, M.; Monforte, A.R.; Nunes, J.; Vicente, A.A.; Pintado, M. Prebiotic effects of olive pomace powders in the gut: In vitro evaluation of the inhibition of adhesion of pathogens, prebiotic and antioxidant effects. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 112, 106312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Conterno, L.; Martinelli, F.; Tamburini, M.; Fava, F.; Mancini, A.; Sordo, M.; Pindo, M.; Martens, S.; Masuero, D.; Vrhovsek, U.; et al. Measuring the impact of olive pomace enriched biscuits on the gut microbiota and its metabolic activity in mildly hypercholesterolaemic subjects. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019, 58, 63–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Papadopoulou, P.; Polissidis, A.; Kythreoti, G.; Sagnou, M.; Stefanatou, A.; Theoharides, T.C. Anti-Inflammatory and Neuroprotective Polyphenols Derived from the European Olive Tree, Olea europaea L., in Long COVID and Other Conditions Involving Cognitive Impairment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 11040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Boronat, A.; Serreli, G.; Rodríguez-Morató, J.; Deiana, M.; de la Torre, R. Olive Oil Phenolic Compounds’ Activity against Age-Associated Cognitive Decline: Clinical and Experimental Evidence. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Goldsmith, C.; Bond, D.; Jankowski, H.; Weidenhofer, J.; Stathopoulos, C.; Roach, P.; Scarlett, C. The Olive Biophenols Oleuropein and Hydroxytyrosol Selectively Reduce Proliferation, Influence the Cell Cycle, and Induce Apoptosis in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Saad, B.; Kmail, A. Olive Oil Polyphenols in Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Promise. Immuno 2025, 5, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Pessoa, H.R.; Zago, L.; Difonzo, G.; Pasqualone, A.; Caponio, F.; Ferraz da Costa, D.C. Olive Leaves as a Source of Anticancer Compounds: In Vitro Evidence and Mechanisms. Molecules 2024, 29, 4249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sánchez-Tena, S.; Reyes-Zurita, F.J.; Díaz-Moralli, S.; Vinardell, M.P.; Reed, M.; García-García, F.; Dopazo, J.; Lupiáñez, J.A.; Günther, U.; Cascante, M. Maslinic Acid-Enriched Diet Decreases Intestinal Tumorigenesis in ApcMin/+ Mice through Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Reprogramming. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Romani, A.; Ieri, F.; Urciuoli, S.; Noce, A.; Marrone, G.; Nediani, C.; Bernini, R. Health Effects of Phenolic Compounds Found in Extra-Virgin Olive Oil, By-Products, and Leaf of Olea europaea L. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Giacintucci, V.; Di Mattia, C.; Sacchetti, G.; Neri, L.; Pittia, P. Role of olive oil phenolics in physical properties and stability of mayonnaise-like emulsions. Food Chem. 2016, 213, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Luzi, F.; Pannucci, E.; Clemente, M.; Grande, E.; Urciuoli, S.; Romani, A.; Torre, L.; Puglia, D.; Bernini, R.; Santi, L. Hydroxytyrosol and Oleuropein-Enriched Extracts Obtained from Olive Oil Wastes and By-Products as Active Antioxidant Ingredients for Poly (Vinyl Alcohol)-Based Films. Molecules 2021, 26, 2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Nazzaro, F.; Fratianni, F.; Cozzolino, R.; Martignetti, A.; Malorni, L.; De Feo, V.; Cruz, A.G.; d’Acierno, A. Antibacterial Activity of Three Extra Virgin Olive Oils of the Campania Region, Southern Italy, Related to Their Polyphenol Content and Composition. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Difonzo, G.; Pasqualone, A.; Silletti, R.; Cosmai, L.; Summo, C.; Paradiso, V.M.; Caponio, F. Use of olive leaf extract to reduce lipid oxidation of baked snacks. Food Res. Int. 2018, 108, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Selim, S.; Albqmi, M.; Al-Sanea, M.M.; Alnusaire, T.S.; Almuhayawi, M.S.; AbdElgawad, H.; Al Jaouni, S.K.; Elkelish, A.; Hussein, S.; Warrad, M.; et al. Valorizing the usage of olive leaves, bioactive compounds, biological activities, and food applications: A comprehensive review. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1008349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Panou, A.A.; Karabagias, I.K. Olive Leaf Extracts as a Medicinal Beverage: Origin, Physico-Chemical Properties, and Bio-Functionality. Beverages 2025, 11, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Gonçalves, M.; Vale, N.; Silva, P. Neuroprotective Effects of Olive Oil: A Comprehensive Review of Antioxidant Properties. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Aouidi, F.; Okba, A.; Hamdi, M. Valorization of functional properties of extract and powder of olive leaves in raw and cooked minced beef meat. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 3195–3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Barukčić, I.; Filipan, K.; Lisak Jakopović, K.; Božanić, R.; Blažić, M.; Repajić, M. The Potential of Olive Leaf Extract as a Functional Ingredient in Yoghurt Production: The Effects on Fermentation, Rheology, Sensory, and Antioxidant Properties of Cow Milk Yoghurt. Foods 2022, 11, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Tavakoli, H.; Hosseini, O.; Jafari, S.M.; Katouzian, I. Evaluation of Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Yogurt Enriched by Olive Leaf Phenolics within Nanoliposomes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 9231–9240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Difonzo, G.; Troilo, M.; Squeo, G.; Pasqualone, A.; Caponio, F. Functional compounds from olive pomace to obtain high-added value foods—A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 101, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Vitali Čepo, D.; Radić, K.; Jurmanović, S.; Jug, M.; Grdić Rajković, M.; Pedisić, S.; Moslavac, T.; Albahari, P. Valorization of Olive Pomace-Based Nutraceuticals as Antioxidants in Chemical, Food, and Biological Models. Molecules 2018, 23, 2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Nissen, L.; Casciano, F.; Chiarello, E.; Di Nunzio, M.; Bordoni, A.; Gianotti, A. Colonic In Vitro Model Assessment of the Prebiotic Potential of Bread Fortified with Polyphenols Rich Olive Fiber. Nutrients 2021, 13, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Nunzio, M.; Picone, G.; Pasini, F.; Chiarello, E.; Caboni, M.; Capozzi, F.; Gianotti, A.; Bordoni, A. Olive oil by-product as functional ingredient in bakery products. Food Res. Int. 2020, 131, 108940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ribeiro, T.B.; Campos, D.; Oliveira, A.; Nunes, J.; Vicente, A.A.; Pintado, M. Study of olive pomace antioxidant dietary fibre powder throughout gastrointestinal tract as multisource of phenolics, fatty acids and dietary fibre. Food Res. Int. 2021, 142, 110032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Tsoupras, A.; Panagopoulou, E.; Kyzas, G. Olive Pomace Bioactives for Functional Foods and Cosmetics. AIMS Agric. Food 2024, 9, 743–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Li, H.; He, H.; Liu, C.; Akanji, T.; Gutkowski, J.; Li, R.; Ma, H.; Wan, Y.; Wu, P.; Li, D.; et al. Dietary polyphenol oleuropein and its metabolite hydroxytyrosol are moderate skin permeable elastase and collagenase inhibitors with synergistic cellular antioxidant effects in human skin fibroblasts. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 73, 460–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kimura, Y.; Sumiyoshi, M. Olive Leaf Extract and Its Main Component Oleuropein Prevent Chronic Ultraviolet B Radiation-Induced Skin Damage and Carcinogenesis in Hairless Mice. J. Nutr. 2009, 139, 2079–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Wanitphakdeedecha, R.; Ng, J.N.C.; Junsuwan, N.; Phaitoonwattanakij, S.; Phothong, W.; Eimpunth, S.; Manuskiatti, W. Efficacy of olive leaf extract-containing cream for facial rejuvenation: A pilot study. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2020, 19, 1662–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Riéffel, R.C.; Agostini, L.; Rodrigues, N.P.; Berlitz, S.J.; Marczak, L.D.F.; Külkamp-Guerreiro, I.C. Sustainable Olive Pomace Extracts for Skin Barrier Support. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Rodrigues, R.; Alves, R.C.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P. Exploring Olive Pomace for Skincare Applications: A Review. Cosmetics 2023, 10, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. World production of olive oil [13].
Figure 1. World production of olive oil [13].
Applsci 15 10717 g001
Figure 2. World production of olive [13].
Figure 2. World production of olive [13].
Applsci 15 10717 g002
Figure 3. Bioactive compounds, health-promoting effects, and industrial applications of olive oil, leaves, and pomace.
Figure 3. Bioactive compounds, health-promoting effects, and industrial applications of olive oil, leaves, and pomace.
Applsci 15 10717 g003
Table 1. Extraction and processing technologies applied to olive oil, leaves, and pomace.
Table 1. Extraction and processing technologies applied to olive oil, leaves, and pomace.
Extraction MethodApplication (Oil/Leaves/Pomace)PrincipleAdvantagesLimitationsReferences
Cold pressingOlive oilCrushing and pressing without heatPreserves quality and bioactivesLower yield[26]
Two-phase/Three-phase centrifugationOlive oil & pomaceDecanter separation of oil, water, and solidsHigh industrial efficiency, scalableGenerates wastewater (3-phase)[27]
Solvent extractionPomace, leavesOrganic solvents dissolve lipids/phenolicsMaximizes recoverySolvent residues, environmental issues[28]
Supercritical CO2 extractionOil, leavesCO2 under high pressure/temperature as solventSolvent-free, preserves thermolabile compoundsHigh cost, complex equipment[29,30]
Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE)Leaves, pomaceAcoustic cavitation enhances the releaseFaster, higher yield, energy-efficientScale-up challenges[31,32,33]
Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE)Leaves, pomaceMicrowave energy heats intracellular waterEfficient polyphenol recoveryRisk of thermal degradation[34,35,36]
Enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE)Oil, leaves, pomaceHydrolytic enzymes degrade cell wallsImproves yield and bioactive recoveryCost, optimization needed[36,37,38,39]
Aqueous extractionLeavesWater-based extractionEco-friendly, simpleLess efficient for lipophilic compounds[40,41]
High-Pressure Processing (HPP)Olive oil, table olivesNon-thermal high-pressure treatment inactivates microbes/enzymesPreserves bioactives, enhances safety, extends shelf lifeHigh cost, specialized equipment[42]
Pulsed Electric Fields (PEFs)Olive oil extraction, pomaceShort electrical pulsesImproves oil yield & phenolic extraction, energy-efficientScale-up challenges, equipment cost[43]
Ozone treatmentTable olivesOxidizing gas destroys microbes and pesticidesEffective microbial inactivationPotential oxidation of sensitive compounds[44]
Fermentation & BioprocessingTable oliveMicrobial or enzymatic transformation of by-productsProduces bioactive-rich extracts, sustainable valorizationRequires optimization and safety validation[45]
NanotechnologyOlive leaves extractsEncapsulation in nanocomposite filmsEnhances stability & delivery of polyphenolsHigh cost[46,47]
Smart Packaging (IoT, sensors, RFID)Olive oilEmbedded sensors for quality monitoring & traceabilityReal-time monitoring, improves consumer trustHigh cost, infrastructure required[48]
Table 2. Comparative Perspective of Olive By-Products.
Table 2. Comparative Perspective of Olive By-Products.
By-ProductMain Bioactives (mg GAE/g DW or Equivalent)Typical Extraction YieldEconomic/Technological FeasibilityReferences
Olive Leaves16,674.0–50,594.3 mg/kg total phenolics; oleuropein 4570.0–27,547.7 mg/kgHigh (UAE, MAE, SC-CO2)Readily scalable; commercialized extracts and teas[77,78]
Olive Pomace2.24 g GAE/100 g dried matrix (DM) total phenolics; oil 13.66% DM; protein 6.64% DMModerate; requires drying/solvent extractionViable in biorefineries; drying cost is the main limitation[9,28]
Olive StonesMostly lignocellulose; low phenolicsLow; limited use for bioactive recoveryBetter suited for energy, biochar, biocomposites[79]
Olive Mill WastewaterHigh concentration of phenolicsHigh with membrane filtration/adsorptionCostly handling; strict regulations needed[80]
Table 3. Application of olive oil, leaves and pomace in food industry.
Table 3. Application of olive oil, leaves and pomace in food industry.
Olive-Derived IngredientFood ProductIncorporation/DoseMain EffectsExplanationReferences
Olive oil (hydroxytyrosol-enriched)Functional oils, dressings, mayonnaise, saucesEnrichment with hydroxytyrosol↑ Oxidative stability, ↓ peroxide formation, maintained color and flavorHydroxytyrosol acts as a powerful antioxidant, inhibiting lipid peroxidation, without altering the sensory properties.[107,108,109]
Olive oil phenolics (oleocanthal)Minimally processed foodsNatural presenceAntibacterial activity vs. Listeria monocytogenes, E. coli; ↑ microbial safetyPolyphenols disrupt bacterial membranes, reducing pathogen survival in fresh food.[110]
Olive leaf powderBaked goodsIncorporated into doughs with fatsDelays lipid oxidation, extends shelf lifePhenolics eliminate free radicals, slowing rancidity and preserving the quality of the product.[111,112]
Olive leaf extract (oleuropein-rich)Functional beverages, teasDirect addition↑ Antioxidant capacity, flavor contributionOleuropein provides strong radical scavenging activity but also imparts herbal/bitter aromatic notes.[113,114]
Olive leaf extract (oleuropein)Minced beefIncorporated in formulations↓ Lipid and myoglobin oxidation; 25–65% reduction in TBARS, 43–65% reduction in metmyoglobinOleuropein prevents oxidation by scavenging radicals.[115]
Olive leaf extractYogurt3–5% addition↑ Total phenolic content (~91 mg GAE/L), ↑ antioxidant capacity (~613 µmol TE/L), good sensory acceptabilityThe extract increases phenolics and antioxidant levels without exceeding the threshold of bitterness, ensuring consumer acceptance.[116]
Encapsulated olive leaf bioactives (nanoliposomes)YogurtEntrapment 70–88%↑ Stability and antioxidant activity, ↓ syneresis, better texture and color retentionEncapsulation protects the phenolics, controls their release and improves the structure of the yogurt.[117]
Olive pomace fiberBakery, cereals, snacksIncorporated into flour-based products↑ Water retention, texture, dietary fiber; sustained polyphenol release during digestionInsoluble fiber increases water retention capacity, while fiber-polyphenol interactions delay release during digestion.[118,119]
Olive pomace phenolic extractActive packaging, edible coatingsFilms and coatingsScavenges free radicals, ↓ microbial growth, extends shelf life of meat, cheese, fruitsGradual release of phenolics into food surface enhances antioxidant[119]
Olive pomace fiber (polyphenol-rich)BreadSubstitution with defatted pomace fiber↑ Prebiotic potential: promotes Bifidobacteriaceae and Lactobacillales; ↓ harmful metabolites in colon modelFermentable fiber and phenolics modulate the gut microbiota, favoring beneficial strains.[120]
Olive pomace powder (fermented bread)BreadIncorporation into dough↑ Phenolic content, anti-inflammatory activity (depends on fermentation)Fermentation increases the bioavailability of phenolics compounds and bioactive peptides, increasing the anti-inflammatory effects.[121]
Pulp-enriched olive pomace powder (POPP)Simulated GI digestion modelRetains ≥ 50% phenolics↑ Bioaccessibility of unsaturated fatty acids; targeted delivery to colonThe fibrous matrix protects the phenolics compounds during digestion, releasing them into the colon, where they exert their bioactivity.[122]
Olive pomace-enriched biscuitsBiscuits (8-week RCT)Enrichment with pomace↑ Phenolic metabolites (DOPAC, homovanillic acid), ↓ oxidized LDL, ↑ beneficial gut microbiotaThe phenolics compounds in olive pomace undergo microbial biotransformation, reducing oxidative stress and modulating intestinal flora.[100]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bubulac, L.; Bogdan-Andreescu, C.F.; Voica, D.V.; Cristea, B.M.; Chiș, M.S.; Slăvescu, D.A. From Olive Oil to Pomace: Sustainable Valorization Pathways Linking Food Processing and Human Health. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 10717. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910717

AMA Style

Bubulac L, Bogdan-Andreescu CF, Voica DV, Cristea BM, Chiș MS, Slăvescu DA. From Olive Oil to Pomace: Sustainable Valorization Pathways Linking Food Processing and Human Health. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(19):10717. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910717

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bubulac, Lucia, Claudia Florina Bogdan-Andreescu, Daniela Victorița Voica, Bogdan Mihai Cristea, Maria Simona Chiș, and Dan Alexandru Slăvescu. 2025. "From Olive Oil to Pomace: Sustainable Valorization Pathways Linking Food Processing and Human Health" Applied Sciences 15, no. 19: 10717. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910717

APA Style

Bubulac, L., Bogdan-Andreescu, C. F., Voica, D. V., Cristea, B. M., Chiș, M. S., & Slăvescu, D. A. (2025). From Olive Oil to Pomace: Sustainable Valorization Pathways Linking Food Processing and Human Health. Applied Sciences, 15(19), 10717. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910717

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop