Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems Enabling Smart Positive Energy Districts
Abstract
1. Introduction
- (i)
- “Measurable targets and a clear implementation timeline”;
- (ii)
- “Transparency about progress towards these targets and any revisions or trade-offs made during project implementation”;
- (iii)
- “The supply and demand of urban services (energy, waste, water and transport) needs to achieve some integration at a local level”;
- (iv)
- “The local residents and community need to be meaningfully engaged”.
- 1.
- Interconnectivity: devices, machines, sensors, and humans communicate among themselves through the IoT;
- 2.
- Technological Assistance: the technological systems support humans in monitoring, problem-solving, and decision-making;
- 3.
- Information Transparency: operators receive detailed information that is critical for decision-making;
- 4.
- Decentralized Decision-Making: CPSs take decisions and perform tasks independently and automatically.
2. Method
- (i)
- Articles and databases reporting on a variety of PED projects; PED studies and reports from the EU SCM platform [29] and the JPI Urban Europe “Booklet of Positive Energy Districts in Europe” [10] were used to identify PEDs that utilize and report on the integration of contemporary technologies. These studies and reports mainly refer to the PED perspective from a multidisciplinary viewpoint, based on the technologies and lessons learnt from experiences on European level. “Even if these works are very relevant for mapping PED and for the creation of a structured repository of information, they do not fully address the complex set of urban challenges and the objective to support decision making, the implementation and replication of PEDs in municipalities, nor the creation of capacity and community building to drive urban transformations” [30]. The interactive PED-EU-NET [29] database, which provides an overview of diverse PED projects, was also used to identify suitable PEDs for this study.
- (ii)
- Scientific articles in acknowledged library repositories and scientific databases, including “Web of Science”, “Scopus”, “ACM”, “IEEE”, and “Google Scholar”. Based on the guidelines of Jesson and Lacey [31], specific keywords like “cyber-physical systems”, “CPS”, “artificial intelligence”, “AI”, “automation”, “sensors”, “robotics”, “internet of things”, “IoT”, “edge computing”, “smart positive energy districts”, and “PED” were used to identify relevant documents in a non-systematic way. The selected keywords guided the identification of relevant articles that focus on recent technologies that contribute to successful PED implementation.
3. Emerging Technologies Enabling Positive Energy Districts
- Demand reduction/energy-saving technologies implemented at the individual building level;
- Energy distribution and supply systems implemented at both individual building and urban scale;
- Energy storage systems implemented at both individual building and urban scale.
3.1. Cyber-Physical Systems
- (i)
- Building Energy Management Systems (BEMS) connected via CPSs to manage heating, cooling, and lighting according to real-time data, and to optimize energy use by adaptive control while comfort levels are maintained.
- (ii)
- Smart meters and IoT sensors that collect environmental data, such as temperature, humidity, and occupancy, and monitor energy generation and consumption in real time across buildings.
- (iii)
- Renewable Energy Integration Platforms managing energy flows dynamically depending on demand and supply. A central CPS is used to collect data from solar PV panels on rooftops.
- (iv)
- Smart Grids and Decentralized Energy Storage (e.g., batteries) are managed by CPSs to store excess energy (e.g., solar power). Demand is estimated by predictive algorithms and grid behavior is adjusted accordingly.
- (v)
- Digital Twins are used as virtual models of the physical district to simulate scenarios for energy optimization. CPSs enable real-time feedback loops to update the digital twin with live data.
3.2. Digital Twins
- (i)
- Energy Flow Optimization: Simulation and optimization of the energy flows within a district with a DT, through modeling of energy generation, energy consumption, and energy storage.
- (ii)
- Demand Response and Load Shifting: DT forecasts energy demand and supply and thus enables dynamic demand response programs to reduce peak loads, avoid fossil fuel-based grid reliance, and improve grid stability.
- (iii)
- Renewable Energy Integration: DT evaluates where and how to deploy renewable energy most effectively, considering local climate and urban structure; hence, optimal operation of distributed energy resources is obtained for maximum energy production and minimum losses.
- (iv)
- Integration with Smart Grids and Utilization: DT acts as a virtual control center that balances energy inflows/outflows and interacts with utility signals for bi-directional energy trading and integration into larger energy networks.
- (v)
- Battery and Thermal Storage Management: DT predicts energy needs and storage behavior to schedule charging/discharging.
- (vi)
- Carbon Emissions Tracking and Mitigation: DT quantifies carbon footprint from building operations, transport, and energy use by supporting strategies to meet EU, national, and local-level carbon neutrality targets.
- (vii)
- Urban Planning and Retrofitting: DT simulates the effects of insulation, window upgrades, passive solar design, and HVAC improvements for providing cost-effective design choices.
- (viii)
- Citizen Engagement and Behavior Modeling: DT models human behavior, such as thermostat settings, and provides feedback via apps or dashboards to promote energy-saving behaviors and increases public engagement in sustainability goals.
- (ix)
- Predictive Maintenance of Infrastructure: DT detects anomalies in system performance and predicts maintenance needs for preventing downtime, increasing energy efficiency, and reducing operational.
3.3. Artificial Intelligence
- (i)
- Energy Demand Forecasting: AI models use occupancy levels, weather data, and historical usage to forecast building energy consumption in real time using machine learning and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). This enables dynamic energy balancing and reduces peak loads [49].
- (ii)
- Renewable Energy Optimization: AI predicts the optimal slope and orientation of solar panels based on seasonal and daily weather patterns for increased energy production and efficiency.
- (iii)
- Smart Energy Management Systems (SEMS): AI-based systems autonomously control heating, ventilation, lighting, and appliances and adapt building climate control systems accordingly by also taking occupancy predictions into consideration to minimize energy waste and maximize comfort.
- (iv)
- Energy Storage Management: AI coordinates when to use stored energy versus grid electricity for cost saving and optimizes charging/discharging of batteries based on real-time supply and demand for enhanced energy reliability and cost efficiency.
- (v)
- Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Energy Trading: AI algorithms facilitate decentralized energy trading among PED members. Blockchain and AI work together to enhance local energy exchange and improve grid independence. This is enabled by automating micro-transactions between households (e.g., using solar panels).
- (vi)
- Grid Interaction and Flexibility Services: AI manages district-level battery storage to respond to real-time grid signals and predicts when and how much energy can be fed into or drawn from the grid. Hence, AI supports grid stability and participation in demand response programs.
- (vii)
- Building Information Modeling (BIM) and AI: AI identifies energy efficiency improvements in district planning stages. AI can be used with BIM to simulate and optimize energy use in new or retrofitted buildings for improved building performance design before construction.
- (viii)
- Predictive Maintenance: AI detects anomalies in energy systems (e.g., HVAC, solar inverters, etc.) by indicating performance drops in solar panels due to dirt accumulation for reduced downtime and extends equipment life.
- (ix)
- Mobility and Electric Vehicle (EV) Integration: AI directs EVs to charge during solar peak hours and discharge during peak demand and optimizes EV charging schedules based on district energy supply and demand to avoid grid overloads and use surplus renewable energy.
- (x)
- Citizen Engagement and Behavior Change: Personalized AI insights show how a household’s actions contribute to the district energy surplus and AI-driven apps and dashboards provide feedback to enhance awareness of and engagement in achieving PED goals. For example, speech emotion recognition (SER) could be deployed to recognize occupants’ emotional feelings and dynamically adjust the system accordingly [50].
3.4. Internet of Things
- (i)
- Smart Energy Management Systems: Real-time monitoring and optimization of energy production, consumption and storage across the PED.
- IoT-enabled meters and sensors track electricity, heating, and cooling usage.
- AI-powered controllers adjust building systems (HVAC, lighting) based on occupancy and weather forecasts.
- Integration into renewable sources (e.g., solar panels) and batteries to store excess energy and release it during peak demand.
- (ii)
- Building Automation and Optimization: Dynamic control of building systems to improve efficiency and comfort.
- IoT devices regulate temperature, ventilation, and lighting based on occupancy data.
- Predictive maintenance alerts for HVAC systems.
- Smart blinds and windows optimize natural light and thermal gains/losses.
- (iii)
- Energy Sharing and Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading: Facilitation of energy exchange between buildings and prosumers within the PED.
- IoT sensors measure energy production and consumption in real time.
- Blockchain enables automated and transparent transactions.
- Smart contracts manage energy pricing and distribution.
- (iv)
- Demand Response and Load Balancing: Adjusting demand to match supply and reduce peak loads.
- ▪
- Smart appliances and EV chargers respond to dynamic pricing signals or grid status.
- ▪
- IoT platforms manage demand in real time, shifting non-essential loads to off-peak hours.
- (v)
- Integration with Mobility Systems: Reduction of emissions and integrating energy use across transport and buildings.
- ▪
- IoT-integrated EV charging stations optimize charging based on grid status and renewable availability.
- ▪
- Connected bike-sharing or car-sharing systems reduce dependency on fossil-fuel transport.
- (vi)
- Environmental Monitoring and Adaptation: Monitoring and responding to environmental conditions that affect energy performance.Application:
- ▪
- Sensors track air quality, humidity, temperature, and solar radiation.
- ▪
- Data used to adapt building behavior or alert residents about pollution or heat stress.
- ▪
- Integration into green infrastructure (e.g., smart irrigation for green roofs).
- (vii)
- Citizen Engagement and Behavioral Insights: Promoting energy-saving behaviors through real-time feedback.
- ▪
- IoT dashboards or mobile apps provide feedback on energy usage.
- ▪
- Users receive tips, comparisons, or incentives based on their energy habits.
- ▪
- Community-wide challenges to encourage reduced energy consumption.
- (viii)
- Urban Infrastructure Monitoring: Monitoring and managing energy-related urban infrastructure for improved performance.
- ▪
- Street lighting that adjusts based on pedestrian/cyclist presence and ambient light.
- ▪
- Smart grids that detect and respond to outages or inefficiencies.
- ▪
- Condition monitoring of district heating and cooling networks.
3.5. Edge Computing
- (i)
- Real-Time Energy Monitoring and Optimization: Edge devices monitor energy consumption and production (e.g., from heat pumps, solar panels) in real time through the collection of building-level data by a local edge server to fine-tune HVAC settings or battery storage use depending on demand and weather forecasts. This enables optimization of energy balance locally without the need for cloud computing.
- (ii)
- Demand Response Management: Edge systems detect peak demand patterns (e.g., dishwashers, EV charging) and autonomously trigger load shifting or load shedding. As a result, grid stress is avoided and reliance on external control centers is reduced.
- (iii)
- Local Renewable Energy Integration: Edge computing coordinates local energy generation (e.g., PV systems) and storage units (e.g., home batteries), and decides when to use solar power, store it, or feed it into the grid based on real-time conditions. This enables better self-consumption and local balancing of supply/demand.
- (iv)
- Microgrid Control and Islanding: Edge computing enables a PED to switch into island mode and operate autonomously in case of grid failures for increased resilience and continuity of energy supply.
- (v)
- Smart Lighting and Street Infrastructure: Edge nodes control public lighting based on occupancy, daylight, and weather; hence, unnecessary energy use and maintenance costs are reduced.
- (vi)
- EV Charging Optimization: Local edge systems coordinate electric vehicle (EV) charging schedules. Hence, grid overload is avoided and charging is aligned with renewable energy availability.
- (vii)
- Building Energy Management Systems (BEMS) Integration: Edge computing integrates diverse BEMSs across a PED for holistic energy management and coordinated scalable operation without reliance on a central cloud service.
- (viii)
- Occupancy and Behavioral Analytics: Edge devices use occupancy sensors and machine learning to analyze usage patterns. For example, an edge AI model can adjust heating and lighting in shared spaces based on real-time presence detection. This improves comfort and energy efficiency without sending personal data to the cloud.
- (ix)
- Predictive Maintenance for Infrastructure: Edge analytics monitor equipment (HVAC, solar inverters, etc.) for signs of failure. For example, local edge nodes detect anomalies in energy equipment and alert maintenance crews before breakdowns. This reduces downtime and extends asset life with minimal data transfer.
- (x)
- Security and Surveillance Systems: Real-time edge-based video processing enhances safety with minimal bandwidth usage for improved security without the need to store sensitive video data in the cloud.
3.6. Blockchain
- Promote effective integration of energy services delivered to the electricity grid by the PED;
- Support the development of a reliable certification system for energy self-sufficiency;
- Enable effective energy trading management among diverse PEDs.
- (i)
- Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Energy Trading: Blockchain creates a secure, transparent ledger for energy transactions in local or consumer-centric marketplaces, enables smart contracts to automate buying/selling based on predefined rules, and decreases the need for intermediates [66].
- (ii)
- Decentralized Energy Management: An important potential benefit of blockchain lies in its decentralized nature and robust security features [67]. Blockchain supports autonomous coordination of distributed energy resources through smart contracts (energy storage usage during peak hours is automatically shifted to balance the PED load), dynamic pricing models based on supply and demand, and local grid stability and load balancing. Complete decentralization of energy markets can be accomplished thanks to the capability of blockchain to enable cryptocurrency-based financial transactions within the energy industry. As a result, financial transactions will no longer need to be controlled from a single location [67].
- (iii)
- Energy Data Transparency and Traceability of energy monitoring for consumption, production, and emissions data: Blockchain ensures robust records of energy flows, provides audit trails for carbon accounting and compliance, and supports real-time verification and certification of green energy trading [66].
- (iv)
- Secure IoT and Smart Meter Integration: PED monitoring relies on IoT sensors and smart meters. Blockchain provides secure data channels and identity management, prevents tampering with device data, and ensures interoperability among devices and systems. Smart meters send real-time data to the blockchain for secure and auditable energy billing.
- (v)
- Carbon Credit and Emissions Trading: Carbon credits are generated by producing clean energy and reducing emissions. They are used to weight emissions from various sources, are often issued by governments or international organizations, and can be traded on carbon markets. One carbon credit is equivalent to 1000 kg of carbon dioxide. The difference the carbon emissions allowed and those actually emitted is called carbon credit [68]. Blockchain supplies tokenized traceable unchallengeable carbon credits, facilitates transparent and automated trading of credits, and verifies emission reductions in real-time (via IoT sensors and blockchain logging).
- (vi)
- Tokenization of Energy Assets: A considerable barrier in the energy sector is the financial strain caused by rising electricity costs. Blockchain allows fractional ownership of e.g., solar farms and battery storage by the use of tokens that correspond to shares in energy-producing assets, hence enabling micro-investments by citizens [69]. Residents invest a certain amount into, e.g., a solar farm and receive dividends or energy credits proportional to their stake
- (vii)
- Resilience and Disaster Recovery: Ensuring energy services during grid outages or cyber-attacks. Blockchain supports off-grid P2P networks for energy resilience, maintains decentralized records for continuity in outages, and can automate fallback energy sharing strategies. In the event of a grid failure, the local PED automatically shifts to a backup mode, with blockchain coordinating energy distribution from batteries and microgrids.
4. Challenges and Potential Solutions in Utilizing Emerging Technologies in Positive Energy Districts
- Lack of accepted methods for assessing energy balances;
- Difficult to integrate renewable energy systems into redundant and old-fashioned urban infrastructures;
- Multi-stakeholder collaboration needed in order to secure local acceptance and safeguard reasonable development processes.
4.1. Business Model Challenges in Positive Energy Districts
- i
- Economic Feasibility: This is challenging because of high initial costs and the requirements of future financial robustness and sustainability. Although PEDs have a wide range of possible revenue streams, many cannot yet be fully materialized due to missing regulatory frameworks [73]. The cost of PEDs needs to further decrease, including technology introduction and integration.
- ii
- Balancing costs and benefits: An effective business model should balance costs and benefits successfully to attract investment and safeguard profitability [2]. PED business models need to consider dynamic pricing, peak shaving (reducing energy consumption at times of high energy demand), new markets to be opened, and new products to be created.
- iii
- Complex stakeholder interactions: Including multiple stakeholders with diverse interests and needs is challenging and requires adequate communication and collaboration strategies for aligning the various stakeholder goals and guaranteeing effective implementation. Cultural differences and social acceptance are likely to impact PED employment. Scaling up or replication of successful PEDs is challenging because different urban areas have different cultural, spatial, and social contexts. PEDs have a number of shared characteristics, despite the fact that they are very specific to their local context. Derkenbaeva et al. [74], for example, argue that “real-life PEDs tend to go beyond the frames set by the definitions because the concept fails to consider the contextual factors that are inherent in them”. Another factor that is important for replication is difference in Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). As stakeholders may use various KPIs for PED assessment, agreement regarding value and impact may increase the challenges [75]. However, it is important to extract the maximum replication potential of a PED in the early design phase in order to allow tailor-made solutions for other local contexts [42].
- iv
- Local community and end-user engagement: PED business models should contain strategies for local community engagement. Their concerns need to be taken into consideration in order to promote acceptance and participation. End-user and public awareness regarding the advantages of PEDs needs to be catered for [76].
- v
- Supportive policies and regulations: These are imperative for the scalability and dispersion of PEDs. The regulatory landscape reveals a noteworthy challenge. Business models usually need to adapt to existing national and regional regulations despite the fact that local policies may not support innovative energy solutions [76]. Governance structures need to be flexible to allow for effective management of the complexity and interdependencies of PEDs. PED business models should be adaptable and include strategies for replication and scalability in different urban contexts, which are distinctive due to varying geographic, historical, and socio-economic conditions [5].
- vi
- Integrating contemporary technologies: Integrating renewable energy systems (e.g., solar PV, wind turbines, and geothermal energy), energy storage solutions, smart grids, hydrogen fuel cells, and biofuels has been proven to be a complex task.
- vii
- Business models: When creating business models, technological advancements and technology adoption should be taken into consideration to ensure the seamless integration of energy management optimization. The technological challenges include energy simulation, modeling, and performance assessment [2,77].
4.2. Technological Challenges in Positive Energy Districts
- (i)
- Automation of environmental sensing and monitoring: Diverse challenges regarding the automation of environmental sensing and monitoring are listed, together with potential solutions for addressing these challenges [78]:
- Amplified data exchange: Due to amplified data exchange across urban areas, increased automation is increasingly being deployed to facilitate local governance and optimization of the services offered [45]. A lack of clear guidelines or standards for modeling these data flows, however, results in limited scalability and changing needs.
- Accurate and precise data gathering: Achieving accurate and precise data gathering by automated sensors and monitoring systems can be challenging—use of contemporary technologies for error detection and correction, sophisticated data collection techniques, and vigorous validation mechanisms will improve data correctness.
- Changes in correctness of measures: Due to, e.g., changes in environmental conditions (which may lead to changes in physical properties and samples), sensor drift (sensor output values changing over time), and calibration issues (comparison of measurement values delivered by a device under test with those of a calibration standard of known accuracy) are serious challenges that need to be identified at an early stage—implementation of strategies for data integration of environmental conditions, and performance of regular sensor calibrations and maintenance are potential solutions.
- Incompatibility of data formats, resolution, and quality: Unifying the data returned from remote sensors, satellite images, and ground-based stations is challenging—potential solutions include the application of data conversion to achieve the same format for all data.
- High costs: The upfront and continuous costs of automation technologies can be challenging—potential solutions include minimizing interruption, and frequent and regular maintenance, including sensor calibration, software and hardware updates, preventive maintenance, and deployment of automated monitoring systems.
- Access to power, network connections, and infrastructure: Data storage and data transmission are imperative for the smooth operation of PEDs. Potential solutions include automated monitoring to avoid disruptions.
- Interdisciplinary collaboration: A general approach, due to PEDs’ complexity and interdisciplinary characteristics, to overcoming challenges concerning environmental monitoring and sensing automation is the collaboration of experts from diverse fields, including computer systems, engineering, social and environmental sciences, and economics.
- Security: The privacy, safety, and security of CPSs in smart PEDs face considerable challenges because of their vulnerabilities to cyber-attacks. Robust security mechanisms to protect against threats like energy theft, grid instability, and unauthorized access are needed. Advanced cybersecurity measures, integrated frameworks, and innovative technologies (e.g., blockchain and quantum computing) can be used to ensure system resilience and protect the system against potential threats (e.g., attacks that create security deficits, affect national grid security, and cause life loss or large-scale economic damage from lack of integrity and confidentiality) [33].
- (ii)
- National security deficits and loss-of-life interdependencies between energy generation method (GM), control method (CM), and energy management system (EMS) topologies: The local energy management system needs a decentralized management and monitoring system. However, interdependencies between energy GM, CM, and EMS topologies lack a distinct developed path and established target parameters to predict future directions for EMS research and to determine robust evaluation parameters for EMS proposals. Kudzin et al. [79] proposed blockchain-based architectures as a potential solution, which are well aligned with incoming decentralized GM and the limitations of CM requirements. Blockchain-based architectures offer adaptability, resilience, scalability, and security and can be considered an effective and efficient choice for a next-generation EMS.
- (iii)
- Communication, data, and physical interoperability: In smart PEDs, digital systems are deployed that contain diverse service providers who collaborate to provide digital services to citizens. Due to lack of standardization of interfaces in isolated systems (vertical silos), they are seen as barriers regarding interoperability and the seamless transfer of data between systems. Bokolo [80] proposed the use of an Application Programming Interface (API) to enable seamless communication interoperability (interface, technology), data interoperability (syntactic, semantic), and physical interoperability (technical, network, device, platform). Another challenge is the interoperability of multiple neighborhood systems, which mainly stem from the incompatibility of the different systems used in the creation of a PED.
- (iv)
- Wireless sensor network (WSN) challenges [78]:
- WSN security issues lead to a lack of communication between sensors and waste more energy. WSNs are disposed to failure due to their huge number of nodes and unique restrictions in both hardware and software [81]. The need for efficient solutions has increased, particularly with the rise of the IoT, which relies on the effectiveness of WSNs. Exploration of ML algorithms together with fuzzy logic has been proposed to increase reliability, particularly in mitigating node and link failures.
- Privacy issues may make WSNs risky [82]. Challenges such as privacy threats posed by smart objects, restriction regarding collecting and processing confidential data, and the regulation of using and distributing confidential data collected need to be considered. When creating new systems and services, users’ requirements should be carefully examined and sensitive data should be responsibly handled.
- Sustainable operations in energy-constrained environments. To improve WSN performance, energy harvesting (EH) from environmental forces (Radio Frequency (RF) signal, sunlight, vibrations, wind, etc.) has been identified as a successful method for obtaining unlimited WSN energy [83]. EH-WSNs maximize the utilization of harvested energy by fine-tuning the operations of sensor nodes according to obtainable power. EH-WSNs enable wireless sensor nodes to prolong their lifetime and to minimize their dependence on constrained energy resources. Also, cognitive radio (CR) technologies are considered to improve spectrum efficiency and to enable dynamic spectrum access by identifying underutilized frequency bands. Security is a challenge in EH technologies. Physical layer security (PLS) has been proposed as a solution because it embeds security in the process of energy harvesting, and as a result, replaces classical encryption techniques [83].
- Time synchronization ensures that all nodes in a WSN share a common time reference, which is essential for accurately timestamping and correlating sensor data. If synchronization packets are delayed or lost, appropriate techniques (e.g., periodic resynchronization, local clock drift correction, etc.) and robust protocols should be used to help maintain timing accuracy [84].
- The efficiency and durability of WSN coverage as well as of route optimizations are pivotal, as WSNs can be rapidly deployed across wide or inaccessible areas. The requirement of gathering data from all network sensors creates limitations on the distance between them [85]. Sensor fusion techniques are employed to combine data from diverse sensors. The aim is to enhance the reliability of environmental monitoring and to provide a more comprehensive understanding of environmental conditions.
- (v)
- IoT challenges [8]:
- The IoT enables the collection and analysis of real-time data from various energy sources [45]. However, IoT devices are vulnerable to cyber-attacks, which can lead to security threats, such as intellectual property theft, data breaches, and disruptions to critical infrastructure.
- Data confidentiality, security, and privacy: Security approaches aim to protect networks (data and devices) against malicious attacks and unauthorized alterations, as well as protecting the privacy of the users (protection of personal information from unauthorized access and misuse) [86]. The backbone of IoT network security consists of cryptography-based methods ensuring data privacy, integrity, and authentication. Resilience to various forms of attack is provided, whilst low scalability, usability, and efficiency are drawbacks.
- Functionality, safety, and fault tolerance: Industry 4.0 has introduced functional safety networks that provide enhanced production reliability, scalability, and flexibility. New contemporary applications have emerged that provide reliable coordination between ICT, sensors, and actuators [87].
- Quality of Service (QoS): Taking QoS characteristics into account, several quality approaches have been proposed at various layers of the IoT architecture [88]. QoS approaches must exist at every layer of the IoT architecture to guarantee a satisfactory level of QoS concerning safety critical applications of IoT.
- Standardization activities, protocols, and architecture: IoT platforms that integrate different element types provided by diverse vendors that use different protocols, different data formats, and different communication technologies is needed to monitor and control the device requirements [89].
5. Relationships Between Emerging Technologies in Positive Energy Districts
- 1.
- Cyber-Physical System–Digital Twins: DTs are digital models or virtual copies of a physical environment, including CPS infrastructure that adapts to real-time physical changes, and swiftly provide beneficial solutions for PED optimization [20]. DTs constitute a promising approach to realize CPSs [90] since they enable analysis, prediction, and optimization of the interconnected physical entities (e.g., energy optimization of BEMS) and support real-time decision-making. CPSs provide DTs with real-time data and control mechanisms which enable anomaly detection in maintenance and control stages and virtual testing [91]. Together, they are important tools for facilitating autonomous systems, smart cities, and PEDs. They can be used to forecast energy demand and end-user consumption patterns, as well as to schedule dispatchable energy generation from shifting renewable energy sources on demand [92].
- 2.
- Cyber-Physical System–Artificial Intelligence: AI supplies cognitive capabilities including reasoning, learning, and decision-making to CPSs. AI enhances CPSs’ data-driven insights (e.g., real-time fault detection, optimization), intelligent control (e.g., adaptive controllers, predictive maintenance), and autonomous operation (e.g., self-driving cars, drones). The evolution of AI decision-making in cyber-physical systems is inevitable and autonomous due to increased integration of connected IoT devices in CPSs [93]. As CPSs generate enormous amounts of data from sensors and other physical components, AI processes and learns from this data and optimizes the behavior of CPSs, which as a result leads to improved data produced by the CPSs. This feedback loop continuously improves system performance. CPSs and AI together are essential for meeting PED positive energy targets due to energy management automation, adaptive control of building environments, and integration of distributed renewable resources [25]. The benefits of integrating AI with CPSs include reduced need for human intervention, improvements in fault tolerance and recovery, optimization of operations and resource use, and improved management.
- 3.
- Cyber-Physical System–Internet of Things: CPSs are complex multi-layered feedback systems that interact with the physical environment through the IoT, which offers pervasive sensing and communication infrastructure to CPSs [32]. CPSs may be focused on, e.g., building real-time applications or providing customized services in the context of the IoT [93]; hence, the IoT is advanced via CPSs due to the introduction of advanced control, automation, real-time processing, decision-making capabilities, and integration within physical processes enabling dynamic optimization of energy flows and system resilience. A CPS usually includes IoT elements, but not all IoT systems classify as CPSs. When CPS is the goal, the IoT is part of the infrastructure necessary to achieve it.
- 4.
- Cyber-Physical System–Edge Computing: A variety of large-scale CPS applications have been widely deployed, such as smart grids, intelligent transportation, and personalized healthcare, with strict real-time requirements due to the fact that delayed outputs may give rise to unacceptable timing faults [94]. CPSs generate data that edge nodes receive and process, and, in turn, edge computing enables CPSs to meet timing constraints, reducing latency challenges. Moreover, edge computing reduces the load on central systems, making CPSs more scalable, and improves privacy by keeping sensitive data local. In addition, edge and CPS integration increases fault tolerance and can save energy in CPS systems by applying local processing. For example, in smart grids, local edge nodes manage energy distribution based on real-time data from CPS components.
- 5.
- Cyber-Physical System–Blockchain: Blockchain complements CPSs by supplying transparency, trust, and secure coordination between distributed digital and physical components. Blockchain enhances CPS security by providing an immutable history of CPS actions and events, improving data protection, increasing trust between system participants, and automating processes using smart contracts, as well as enabling forensic analysis in the event of an attack or system failure [95]. Blockchain, together with smart contracts, enables distributed control logic and decentralization of energy markets by utilizing cryptocurrency-based financial transactions. The synergy between CPS and blockchain shows promise for progressing the development and operation of sustainable, secure, and efficient PEDs [96].
- 6.
- Digital Twins–Artificial Intelligence: DTs and AI are two different but complementary technologies. DTs are digital copies of a physical asset that collect information from IoT devices, and apply advanced analytics, ML, and AI real-time processed data about physical assets’ lifecycle process [25]. When integrated, they can significantly improve system performance, predictive capabilities, and decision-making. Two AI techniques, ML and NLP, are instrumental in modeling, extracting, and mapping the complex elements of PEDs, facilitating tasks like demand forecasting, system control, and stakeholder mapping [42]. AI instills intelligence in DTs by analyzing large volumes of sensor data in order to detect patterns, anomalies, and trends, while DTs provide the data and real-world context that AI needs to perform. ML models predict future states or failures, making DTs predictive instead of descriptive. Moreover, AI optimizes system parameters or processes in real-time by running simulations through the DT. AI integrated with DT can provide urban traffic management, and energy optimization with grid management and forecasting in renewable energy systems.
- 7.
- Digital Twins–Internet of Things: The relationship between DTs and the IoT in the context of PEDs is both complementary and synergistic. The two technologies interrelate and reinforce each other in the development and management of PEDs. DTs can be divided into three parts: the physical product, the virtual product, and the communication infrastructure/data collection systems. A critical aspect of the DT is the connection between the physical twin and the digital twin, which consists of IoT sensors and actuators [91]. The IoT continuously feeds DTs with accurate data, ensuring a trustworthy digital model, and, in turn, DTs simulate future scenarios using IoT data to visualize IoT data, guide and direct energy management, and facilitate intelligent control of PED operations. For example, at a microgrid network level, a vast number of assets, sensors, meters, controllers, and actuators are connected to the Internet through diverse IoT communication networks [97]. The integration of DTs and IoT creates a feedback loop that continuously improves PED energy performance.
- 8.
- Digital Twins–Edge Computing: DTs and edge computing form a synergistic pair in PEDs. Integrating DTs with edge computing in PEDs enables real-time, efficient, and secure resource management, data synchronization, and service optimization for smart grids and urban energy systems [98]. DTs provide the intelligence and simulation capability, while edge computing enables local, fast, and secure execution of the DT insights, and, together, they enable PEDs to be more responsive, efficient, and sustainable. In general, DTs involve sensitive urban data, such as residents’ energy usage, but when processing data at the edge, unnecessary personal data transmissions are minimized and compliance with privacy regulations and data sovereignty is enabled.
- 9.
- Digital Twins–Blockchain: The integration of DTs and blockchain holds significant promise in the context of PEDs. Blockchain validates and secures the data stream feeding the DTs, ensuring that simulations and decisions are based on tamper-proof, verified inputs. DT forecasts inform the blockchain’s smart contracts when and how much energy can be traded, creating an autonomous self-regulating PED. Blockchain reinforces trust in the data and models used by DTs, enhancing multi-stakeholder collaboration. The integration of DTs with blockchain enables the creation of decentralized energy trading platforms, P2P transactions, and the use of smart contracts, promoting trust and automation in energy exchanges [99]. Blockchain-enabled DT grids offer strong cybersecurity, protection of energy systems from cyber-attacks, and safeguarding of data integrity, as well as optimization of energy production, distribution, and consumption, while preserving privacy and detecting malicious behavior [100]. This synergy is significant for next generation of smart grids and PEDs, enabling resilient, sustainable, and user-centric energy systems that align with global sustainability goals [101].
- 10.
- Artificial Intelligence–Internet of Things: The relationship between AI and the IoT is central to the development and operation of PEDs. The increased utilization of renewable energy sources requires infrastructure re-structuring, enabling grid development and AI usage for distributed and intermittent generation. The integration of AI, IoT, and blockchain technologies into energy and power systems improves efficiency, sustainability, and reliability [102]. The integration of AI and the IoT is significant for smart, sustainable urban energy systems. IoT applications in building energy management, enhanced by AI, are able to transform how energy is consumed, monitored, and optimized, particularly in distributed energy systems [103]. By using IoT sensors and smart meters, real-time data regarding PED energy usage patterns, occupancy, temperature, and lighting conditions can be collected. This data is analyzed by AI algorithms to identify inefficiencies, predict energy demand, and suggest or automate adjustments to optimize energy use. In PEDs, the IoT provides the data infrastructure, while AI provides the intelligence needed to orchestrate complex systems and ensure the PED produces more energy than it consumes.
- 11.
- Artificial Intelligence–Edge Computing: The relationship between AI and edge computing in the context of PEDs is very synergistic. An edge-AI-based forecasting approach is proposed to improve satisfaction with prediction accuracy and smart microgrid efficiency by analyzing and processing consumer power data and distributed renewable energy generation [104]. The integration of AI and edge computing facilitates real-time, intelligent, and decentralized management of energy systems in urban environments, aiding PEDs to reach their goal of annually producing more energy than they consume. Moreover, the integration of AI and edge provides many benefits for the Internet of Energy, such as reduced latency, real-time analytics, improved security, enhanced scalability, and better cost-efficiency, but faces challenges such as security and standardization [105].
- 12.
- Artificial Intelligence–Blockchain: The connection between AI and blockchain in the context of PEDs consists of influential synergies for advancing sustainable urban development. AI enhances energy management by predicting demand, optimizing consumption, and enabling real-time control, while blockchain provides secure, transparent, and decentralized platforms for energy trading and certification of energy self-sufficiency within and between DEPs [106]. The integration of AI and blockchain enables prosumers to participate in energy markets and contribute to the optimization of power system operations; hence, they support net zero emission targets. This integration also enables autonomous, self-regulating, intelligent, efficient, trusted, and transparent energy systems, where PEDs not only sustain themselves but contribute positively to the broader grid and the environment.
- 13.
- Internet of Things–Edge Computing: In the context of PEDs, both the IoT and edge computing play critical and complementary roles. Their relationship is central to achieving the real-time monitoring, optimization, and efficiency required in PEDs. Edge computing can reduce latency and bandwidth consumption by processing data on IoT devices or near them [107]. The IoT captures the necessary real-time data, while edge computing ensures that this data is acted upon swiftly and locally, reducing dependency on centralized systems. Together, they help PEDs achieve efficiency, sustainability, and autonomy.
- 14.
- Internet of Things–Blockchain: The relationship between IoT and blockchain within PEDs is emerging as a critical synergy for achieving efficient, secure, and sustainable energy systems. This synergy enhances trust among stakeholders, supports automated settlements, and facilitates the integration of renewable energy sources. Blockchain enhances energy efficiency in IoT-enabled energy systems by ensuring data immutability and transparency [108]. Moreover, blockchain can address the IoT’s security and privacy challenges, ensuring safe data transmission and robust resource allocation in complex, heterogeneous energy systems. A proposed approach based on IoT components, blockchain, and smart contracts stores data and adds a reward and penalty strategy to the payment strategy, a basic feature of blockchain [109]. In PEDs, the combination of the IoT and blockchain creates a robust, transparent, and autonomous energy ecosystem. The IoT ensures real-time control and data collection, while blockchain guarantees security, transparency, and decentralization, enabling smart, sustainable urban environments.
- 15.
- Edge Computing–Blockchain: Edge computing and blockchain are increasingly being integrated to support the development of PEDs. Edge computing enables real-time data processing and decision-making close to energy sources and consumers, reducing latency and improving system responsiveness, while blockchain provides a secure, transparent, and decentralized platform for energy transactions and data sharing. This combination enhances trust, privacy, and security in energy trading, with efficient peer-to-peer transactions and protection against cyber threats in smart grids and microgrids [110]. Edge computing with blockchain can optimize energy trading, reduce operational costs, and improve the reliability and efficiency of decentralized energy systems [111]. Overall, the synergy between these two technologies is pivotal for enabling secure, efficient, and scalable energy management in PEDs. The combination fosters resilience, transparency, autonomy, and efficiency, which are all critical to the successful creation and operation of PEDs.
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- 2050 Long-Term Strategy—European Commission. Available online: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/climate-strategies-targets/2050-long-term-strategy_en (accessed on 23 January 2025).
- Krangsås, S.G.; Steemers, K.; Konstantinou, T.; Soutullo, S.; Liu, M.; Giancola, E.; Prebreza, B.; Ashrafian, T.; Murauskaitė, L.; Maas, N. Positive Energy Districts: Identifying Challenges and Interdependencies. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y. Decentralized Transactive Energy Community in Edge Grid with Positive Buildings and Interactive Electric Vehicles. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 135, 107510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soutullo, S.; Giancola, E.; Sanchez, M.N.; Ferrer Tevar, J.A.; García, D.; Suárez López, M.J.; Prieto, J.-I.; Antuña Yudego, E.; Carús Candás, J.; Fernández, M.Á.; et al. Methodology for Quantifying the Energy Saving Potentials Combining Building Retrofitting, Solar Thermal Energy and Geothermal Resources. Energies 2020, 2020, 5970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monti, A.; Pesch, D.; Ellis, K.A.; Mancarella, P. Chapter One—Introduction. In Energy Positive Neighborhoods and Smart Energy Districts; Monti, A., Pesch, D., Ellis, K.A., Mancarella, P., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 1–5. ISBN 978-0-12-809951-3. [Google Scholar]
- Gollner, C. Europe towards Positive Energy Districts: A Compilation of Projects towards Sustainable Urbanization and the Energy Transition; Urban Europe. 2020. Available online: https://jpi-urbaneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/PED-Booklet-Update-Feb-2020_2.pdf (accessed on 27 January 2025).
- Positive Energy Districts (PED). Available online: https://jpi-urbaneurope.eu/ped/ (accessed on 27 January 2025).
- Kozlowska, A. Positive Energy Districts: Fundamentals, Assessment Methodologies, Modeling and Research Gaps. Energies 2024, 17, 4425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bossi, S.; Gollner, C.; Theierling, S. Towards 100 Positive Energy Districts in Europe: Preliminary Data Analysis of 61 European Cases. Energies 2020, 13, 6083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gollner, C.; Hinterberger, R.; Noll, M.; Meyer, S.; Schwarz, H.-G. Booklet of Positive Energy Districts in Europe; Urban Europe. 2019. Available online: https://jpi-urbaneurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Booklet-of-PEDs_JPI-UE_v5_NO-ADD.pdf (accessed on 27 January 2025).
- Saheb, Y.; Shnapp, S.; Johnson, C. The Zero Energy Concept: Making the Whole Greater than the Sum of the Parts to Meet the Paris Climate Agreement’s Objectives. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2018, 30, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission—Department: Energy—In Focus. Available online: https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2020-03/in_focus_energy_efficiency_in_buildings_en.pdf (accessed on 17 February 2025).
- Terés-Zubiaga, J.; Bolliger, R.; Almeida, M.G.; Barbosa, R.; Rose, J.; Thomsen, K.E.; Montero, E.; Briones-Llorente, R. Cost-Effective Building Renovation at District Level Combining Energy Efficiency & Renewables—Methodology Assessment Proposed in IEA EBC Annex 75 and a Demonstration Case Study. Energy Build. 2020, 224, 110280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Energy in Building and Communities Programme (EBC). Overview of Available and Emerging Technology for Cost-Effective Building Renovation at District Level Combining Energy Efficiency & Renewables. Available online: https://annex75.iea-ebc.org/Data/publications/Annex75_A1_Report_TechnologyOverview_07_July_2023.pdf (accessed on 17 February 2025).
- Energy in Building and Communities Programme (EBC). Success Stories of Cost-Effective Building Renovation at District Level Combining Energy Efficiency & Renewables. Available online: https://www.iea-ebc.org/Data/publications/Annex75_C1_SuccessStories_07_July_2023.pdf (accessed on 17 February 2025).
- Shnapp, S.; Paci, D.; Bertoldi, P. Enabling Positive Energy Districts Across Europe: Energy Efficiency Couples Renewable Energy; Publication Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruckner, H.; Alyokhina, S.; Schneider, S.; Binder, M.; Abdin, Z.U.; Santbergen, R.; Verkou, M.; Zeman, M.; Isabella, O.; Pagliarini, M.; et al. Lessons Learned from Four Real-Life Case Studies: Energy Balance Calculations for Implementing Positive Energy Districts. Energies 2025, 18, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habib, M.K.; Chimsom, I.C. CPS: Role, Characteristics, Architectures and Future Potentials. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022, 200, 1347–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clerici Maestosi, P. Harmonizing Urban Innovation: Exploring the Nexus between Smart Cities and Positive Energy Districts. Energies 2024, 17, 3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Shen, J.; Saini, P.K.; Lovati, M.; Han, M.; Huang, P.; Huang, Z. Digital Twin for Accelerating Sustainability in Positive Energy District: A Review of Simulation Tools and Applications. Front. Sustain. Cities 2021, 3, 663269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clean Energy for All Europeans Package Completed: Good for Consumers, Good for Growth and Jobs, and Good for the Planet—European Commission. Available online: https://commission.europa.eu/news/clean-energy-all-europeans-package-completed-good-consumers-good-growth-and-jobs-and-good-planet-2019-05-22_en (accessed on 26 April 2025).
- European Commission. REPowerEU. Available online: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/repowereu-affordable-secure-and-sustainable-energy-europe_en (accessed on 26 April 2025).
- Lampropoulos, G.; Siakas, K. Enhancing and Securing Cyber-Physical Systems and Industry 4.0 through Digital Twins: A Critical Review. J. Softw. Evol. Process 2023, 35, e2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serôdio, C.; Mestre, P.; Cabral, J.; Gomes, M.; Branco, F. Software and Architecture Orchestration for Process Control in Industry 4.0 Enabled by Cyber-Physical Systems Technologies. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agostinelli, S.; Cumo, F.; Guidi, G.; Tomazzoli, C. Cyber-Physical Systems Improving Building Energy Management: Digital Twin and Artificial Intelligence. Energies 2021, 14, 2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delicato, F.C.; Al-Anbuky, A.; Wang, K.I.-K. Editorial: Smart Cyber–Physical Systems: Toward Pervasive Intelligence Systems. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020, 107, 1134–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zografopoulos, I.; Ospina, J.; Liu, X.; Konstantinou, C. Cyber-Physical Energy Systems Security: Threat Modeling, Risk Assessment, Resources, Metrics, and Case Studies. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 29775–29818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snyder, H. Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 104, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Investing in a Sustainable and Green Urban Future | Smart Cities Marketplace. Available online: https://smart-cities-marketplace.ec.europa.eu/ (accessed on 16 June 2025).
- Turci, G.; Alpagut, B.; Civiero, P.; Kuzmic, M.; Pagliula, S.; Massa, G.; Albert-Seifried, V.; Seco, O. Silvia Soutullo A Comprehensive PED-Database for Mapping and Comparing Positive Energy Districts Experiences at European Level. Sustainability 2021, 14, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jesson, J.; Lacey, F. How to Do (or Not to Do) a Critical Literature Review. Pharm. Educ. 2006, 6, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanso, H.; Noureddine, A.; Exposito, E. A Review of Energy Aware Cyber-Physical Systems. Cyber-Phys. Syst. 2024, 10, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cicceri, G.; Tricomi, G.; D’Agati, L.; Longo, F.; Merlino, G.; Puliafito, A. A Deep Learning-Driven Self-Conscious Distributed Cyber-Physical System for Renewable Energy Communities. Sensors 2023, 23, 4549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aspen Smart City Research. Available online: https://www.ascr.at/en/ (accessed on 10 June 2025).
- Yu, X.; Xue, Y. Smart Grids: A Cyber–Physical Systems Perspective. Proc. IEEE 2016, 104, 1058–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lampropoulos, G.; Siakas, K.; Anastasiadis, T. Internet of Things (IoT) in Industry: Contemporary Application Domains, Innovative Technologies and Intelligent Manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Res. Eng. (IJASRE) 2018, 4, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, J.; Saini, P.K.; Zhang, X. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence for Digital Twin to Accelerate Sustainability in Positive Energy Districts. In Data-Driven Analytics for Sustainable Buildings and Cities: From Theory to Application; Zhang, X., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 411–422. ISBN 978-981-16-2778-1. [Google Scholar]
- Tartia, J.; Hämäläinen, M. Co-Creation Processes and Urban Digital Twins in Sustainable and Smart Urban District Development—Case Kera District in Espoo, Finland. Open Res. Eur. 2024, 4, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coors, V.; Padsala, R. Urban Digital Twins Empowering Energy Transition: Citizen-Driven Sustainable Urban Transformation towards Positive Energy Districts. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Smart Data and Smart Cities (SDSC), Athens, Greece, 4 June 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Malakhatka, E.; Wästberg, D.; Wallbaum, H.; Pooyanfar, P.; Dursun, İ.; Hofer, G.; Thuvander, L. Towards Positive Energy Districts: Multi-Criteria Framework and Quality Assurance. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2024, 1363, 012085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, T.H.; Weedon, Z.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Sanchez, T.; Corchado, J.M.; Mehmood, R. Algorithmic Urban Planning for Smart and Sustainable Development: Systematic Review of the Literature. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 94, 104562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, M.; Canli, I.; Shah, J.; Zhang, X.; Dino, I.G.; Kalkan, S. Perspectives of Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing on Characterizing Positive Energy Districts. Buildings 2024, 14, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, R. Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Energy Transition: A Comprehensive Review. Energy Strategy Rev. 2025, 57, 101600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olatunde, T.M.; Okwandu, A.C.; Akande, D.O.; Sikhakhane, Z.Q. Reviewing the role of artificial intelligence in energy efficiency optimization. Eng. Sci. Technol. J. 2024, 5, 1243–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alenazi, M.M. IoT and Energy. In Internet of Things—New Insights; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siakas, D.; Rahanu, H.; Georgiadou, E.; Siakas, K.; Lampropoulos, G. Positive Energy Districts Enabling Smart Energy Communities. Energies 2025, 18, 3131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arévalo, P.; Jurado, F. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Planning and Operation of Distributed Energy Systems in Smart Grids. Energies 2024, 17, 4501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Wang, H.; Löschel, A.; Zhou, P. Energy Transition toward Carbon-Neutrality in China: Pathways, Implications and Uncertainties. Front. Eng. Manag. 2022, 9, 358–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, K.-H.; Pau, G.; Im, S.-K. Chebyshev Pooling: An Alternative Layer for the Pooling of CNNs-Based Classifier. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering Technology (CCET), Beijing, China, 13–15 August 2021; pp. 106–110. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, X.; Im, S.-K. Speech Emotion Recognition Based on Graph-LSTM Neural Network. EURASIP J. Audio Speech Music. Process. 2023, 2023, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siakas, E.; Lampropoulos, G.; Rahanu, H.; Georgiadou, E.; Siakas, D.; Siakas, K. REFIoT: A Framework to Combat Requirements Engineering in IoT Applications and Systems. In Proceedings of the Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, Munich, Germany, 4–6 September 2024; Yilmaz, M., Clarke, P., Riel, A., Messnarz, R., Greiner, C., Peisl, T., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 80–96. [Google Scholar]
- Hossein Motlagh, N.; Mohammadrezaei, M.; Hunt, J.; Zakeri, B. Internet of Things (IoT) and the Energy Sector. Energies 2020, 13, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chataut, R.; Phoummalayvane, A.; Akl, R. Unleashing the Power of IoT: A Comprehensive Review of IoT Applications and Future Prospects in Healthcare, Agriculture, Smart Homes, Smart Cities, and Industry 4.0. Sensors 2023, 23, 7194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazhar, T.; Irfan, H.M.; Haq, I.; Ullah, I.; Ashraf, M.; Shloul, T.A.; Ghadi, Y.Y.; Imran; Elkamchouchi, D.H. Analysis of Challenges and Solutions of IoT in Smart Grids Using AI and Machine Learning Techniques: A Review. Electronics 2023, 12, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lampropoulos, G.; Siakas, K.; Anastasiadis, T. Internet of Things in the Context of Industry 4.0: An Overview. Int. J. Entrep. Knowl. 2019, 7, 4–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunduz, M.Z.; Das, R. Cyber-Security on Smart Grid: Threats and Potential Solutions. Comput. Netw. 2020, 169, 107094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cano-Suñén, E.; Martínez, I.; Fernández, Á.; Zalba, B.; Casas, R. Internet of Things (IoT) in Buildings: A Learning Factory. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, C.; Fan, T.; Gao, H.; Shi, W.; Liu, L.; Cérin, C.; Wan, J. Energy Aware Edge Computing: A Survey. Comput. Commun. 2020, 151, 556–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Yang, T.; Delicato, F.C.; Pires, P.F.; Tari, Z.; Khan, S.U.; Zomaya, A.Y. On Enabling Sustainable Edge Computing with Renewable Energy Resources. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fereira, R.J.; Ranaweera, C.; Lee, K.; Schneider, J.-G. Energy Efficient Resource Management for Real-Time IoT Applications. Internet Things 2025, 30, 101515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.; Man, K.L. Edge Computing for Internet of Things. Electronics 2022, 11, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasankhani, A.; Mehdi Hakimi, S.; Bisheh-Niasar, M.; Shafie-khah, M.; Asadolahi, H. Blockchain Technology in the Future Smart Grids: A Comprehensive Review and Frameworks. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 129, 106811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aslam, S.; Bukovszki, V.; Mrissa, M. Decentralized Data Management Privacy-Aware Framework for Positive Energy Districts. Energies 2021, 14, 7018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Y. Transitioning to Sustainable Energy: Opportunities, Challenges, and the Potential of Blockchain Technology. Front. Energy Res. 2023, 11, 1258044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallo, P.; Restifo, G.L.; Sanseverino, E.R.; Sciumè, G.; Zizzo, G. A Blockchain-Based Platform for Positive Energy Districts. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2022 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), Prague, Czech Republic, 28 June–1 July 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Andoni, M.; Robu, V.; Flynn, D.; Abram, S.; Geach, D.; Jenkins, D.; McCallum, P.; Peacock, A. Blockchain Technology in the Energy Sector: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Opportunities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 100, 143–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gawusu, S.; Solahudeen Tando, M.; Ahmed, A.; Abdulai Jamatutu, S.; Afriyie Mensah, R.; Das, O.; Mohammed, A.-L.; Nandom Yakubu, I.; Ackah, I. Decentralized Energy Systems and Blockchain Technology: Implications for Alleviating Energy Poverty. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2024, 65, 103795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, M. Navigating the World of Carbon Credits: Strategies for Emissions Reduction and Market Participation. Int. J. Trend Sci. Res. Dev. 2023, 7, 259–264. [Google Scholar]
- Akiladevi, R.; Sardha, S.; Shruthi, R. Tokenization of Energy Assets: A Multichain Blockchain Approach. In Proceedings of the 2024 5th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Sustainable Informatics (ICMCSI), Lalitpur, Nepal, 18–19 January 2024; pp. 702–709. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Penaka, S.R.; Giriraj, S.; Sánchez, M.N.; Civiero, P.; Vandevyvere, H.H.B. Characterizing Positive Energy District (Ped) through a Preliminary Review of 60 Existing Projects in Europe. Buildings 2021, 11, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Union. Directive—EU—2024/1275—EN—EUR-Lex. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1275/oj/eng (accessed on 5 March 2025).
- Ala-Juusela, M.; Tuerk, A. Business Models for Rolling out Positive Energy Buildings. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1122, 012060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fina, B.; Monsberger, C.; Auer, H. A Framework to Estimate the Large-Scale Impacts of Energy Community Roll-Out. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Derkenbaeva, E.; Halleck Vega, S.; Hofstede, G.J.; Van Leeuwen, E. Positive Energy Districts: Mainstreaming Energy Transition in Urban Areas. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 153, 111782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Good, N.; Martínez Ceseña, E.A.; Mancarella, P.; Monti, A.; Pesch, D.; Ellis, K.A. Chapter Eight—Barriers, Challenges, and Recommendations Related to Development of Energy Positive Neighborhoods and Smart Energy Districts. In Energy Positive Neighborhoods and Smart Energy Districts; Monti, A., Pesch, D., Ellis, K.A., Mancarella, P., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 251–274. ISBN 978-0-12-809951-3. [Google Scholar]
- Uspenskaia, D.; Specht, K.; Kondziella, H.; Bruckner, T. Challenges and Barriers for Net?Zero/Positive Energy Buildings and Districts—Empirical Evidence from the Smart City Project SPARCS. Buildings 2021, 11, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monti, A.; Pesch, D.; Ellis, K.; Mancarella, P. (Eds.) Energy Positive Neighborhoods and Smart Energy Districts: Methods, Tools, and Experiences from the Field; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Borah, S.S.; Khanal, A.; Sundaravadivel, P. Emerging Technologies for Automation in Environmental Sensing: Review. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kudzin, A.; Takayama, S.; Ishigame, A. Energy Management Systems (EMS) for a Decentralized Grid: A Review and Analysis of the Generation and Control Methods Impact on EMS Type and Topology. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2025, 19, e70008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bokolo, A.J. Enabling Seamless Interoperability of Digital Systems in Smart Cities Using API: ASystematic Literature Review. J. Urban. Technol. 2024, 31, 123–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heidari, A.; Amiri, Z.; Jamali, M.A.J.; Jafari, N. Assessment of Reliability and Availability of Wireless Sensor Networks in Industrial Applications by Considering Permanent Faults. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 2024, 36, e8252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faris, M.; Mahmud, M.N.; Salleh, M.F.M.; Alnoor, A. Wireless Sensor Network Security: A Recent Review Based on State-of-the-Art Works. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag. 2023, 15, 18479790231157220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mushtaq, M.U.; Venter, H.; Singh, A.; Owais, M. Advances in Energy Harvesting for Sustainable Wireless Sensor Networks: Challenges and Opportunities. Hardware 2025, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilius, Š.; Gailius, D.; Knyva, M.; Balčiūnas, G.; Meškuotienė, A.; Dobilienė, J.; Joneliūnas, S.; Kuzas, P. Time Delay Characterization in Wireless Sensor Networks for Distributed Measurement Applications. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2024, 13, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Andrew, L.L.H.; Foh, C.H.; Zukerman, M.; Chen, H.-H. Connectivity, Coverage and Placement in Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors 2009, 9, 7664–7693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wakili, A.; Bakkali, S. Privacy-Preserving Security of IoT Networks: A Comparative Analysis of Methods and Applications. Cyber Secur. Appl. 2025, 3, 100084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peserico, G.; Morato, A.; Tramarin, F.; Vitturi, S. Functional Safety Networks and Protocols in the Industrial Internet of Things Era. Sensors 2021, 21, 6073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, G.; Nallur, V.; Clarke, S. Quality of Service Approaches in IoT: A Systematic Mapping. J. Syst. Softw. 2017, 132, 186–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domínguez-Bolaño, T.; Campos, O.; Barral, V.; Escudero, C.J.; García-Naya, J.A. An Overview of IoT Architectures, Technologies, and Existing Open-Source Projects. Internet Things 2022, 20, 100626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Z.; Hackl, C.M.; Anand, A.; Thommessen, A.; Petzschmann, J.; Kamel, O.; Braunbehrens, R.; Kaifel, A.; Roos, C.; Hauptmann, S. Digital Twins for the Future Power System: An Overview and a Future Perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piras, G.; Agostinelli, S.; Muzi, F. Digital Twin Framework for Built Environment: A Review of Key Enablers. Energies 2024, 17, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aghazadeh Ardebili, A.; Longo, A.; Ficarella, A. Digital Twins Bonds Society with Cyber-Physical Energy Systems: A Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conferences on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing & Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical & Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) and IEEE Congress on Cybermatics (Cybermatics), Melbourne, Australia, 6–8 December 2021; pp. 284–289. [Google Scholar]
- Bordel, B.; Alcarria, R.; Robles, T.; Martín, D. Cyber–Physical Systems: Extending Pervasive Sensing from Control Theory to the Internet of Things. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2017, 40, 156–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, K.; Weng, J.; Li, K. Reliability-Driven End–End–Edge Collaboration for Energy Minimization in Large-Scale Cyber-Physical Systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2024, 73, 230–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, D.; Banerjee, S.; Chatterjee, P.; Ghosh, U.; Biswas, U.; Mansoor, W. Security, Trust, and Privacy Management Framework in Cyber-Physical Systems Using Blockchain. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 20th Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 8–11 January 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Khalil, A.A.; Franco, J.; Parvez, I.; Uluagac, S.; Shahriar, H.; Rahman, M.A. A Literature Review on Blockchain-Enabled Security and Operation of Cyber-Physical Systems. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 46th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 27 June–1 July 2022; pp. 1774–1779. [Google Scholar]
- Saad, A.; Faddel, S.; Mohammed, O. IoT-Based Digital Twin for Energy Cyber-Physical Systems: Design and Implementation. Energies 2020, 13, 4762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; Jia, Z.; Liao, H.; Lu, W.; Mumtaz, S.; Guizani, M.; Tariq, M. Secure and Latency-Aware Digital Twin Assisted Resource Scheduling for 5G Edge Computing-Empowered Distribution Grids. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2022, 18, 4933–4943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmood, M.; Chowdhury, P.; Yeassin, R.; Hasan, M.; Ahmad, T.; Chowdhury, N.-U.-R. Impacts of Digitalization on Smart Grids, Renewable Energy, and Demand Response: An Updated Review of Current Applications. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2024, 24, 100790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Ge, Y.; Jia, L. Double Robust Federated Digital Twin Modeling in Smart Grid. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 39913–39931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adnan, M.; Ahmed, I.; Iqbal, M.S.; Rayyan Fazal, M.; Siddiqi, S.J.; Tariq, M. Exploring the Convergence of Metaverse, Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence, and Digital Twin for Pioneering the Digitization in the Envision Smart Grid 3.0. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2024, 120, 109709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalid, M. Energy 4.0: AI-Enabled Digital Transformation for Sustainable Power Networks. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2024, 193, 110253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rojek, I.; Mikołajewski, D.; Mroziński, A.; Macko, M.; Bednarek, T.; Tyburek, K. Internet of Things Applications for Energy Management in Buildings Using Artificial Intelligence—A Case Study. Energies 2025, 18, 1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, L.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Gupta, B.B.; Tian, Z. An Edge-AI Based Forecasting Approach for Improving Smart Microgrid Efficiency. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2022, 18, 7946–7954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Himeur, Y.; Sayed, A.N.; Alsalemi, A.; Bensaali, F.; Amira, A. Edge AI for Internet of Energy: Challenges and Perspectives. Internet Things 2024, 25, 101035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, W.; Chen, Y.; Qadrdan, M.; Jiang, J.; Sun, H.; Wu, J. Applications of Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Enabling Prosumers in Smart Grids: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 161, 112308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gangrade, P.; Kushwah, V.S.; Date, S.S.; Jagdale, A.D.; Upreti, K.; Singh, V.K. Edge and Fog Computing in Cyber-Physical Systems. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Intelligent Control, Computing and Communications (IC3), Mathura, India, 13–14 February 2025; pp. 172–176. [Google Scholar]
- Habibullah, S.M.; Alam, S.; Ghosh, S.; Dey, A.; De, A. Blockchain-Based Energy Consumption Approaches in IoT. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 28088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olivieri, G.; Volpe, G.; Mangini, A.M.; Pia Fanti, M. A District Energy Management Approach Based on Internet of Things and Blockchain. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech), Falerna, Italy, 12–15 September 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Otoum, S.; Ridhawi, I.A.; Mouftah, H. A Federated Learning and Blockchain-Enabled Sustainable Energy Trade at the Edge: A Framework for Industry 4.0. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023, 10, 3018–3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; Wang, B.; Dong, M.; Ota, K. Secure and Efficient Vehicle-to-Grid Energy Trading in Cyber Physical Systems: Integration of Blockchain and Edge Computing. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. Syst. 2019, 50, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lampropoulos, G.; Garzón, J.; Misra, S.; Siakas, K. The Role of Artificial Intelligence of Things in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: State of the Art. Sensors 2024, 24, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ntafalias, A.; Papadopoulos, P.; van Wees, M.; Šijačić, D.; Shafqat, O.; Hukkalainen, M.; Kantorovitch, J.; Lage, M. The Benefits of Positive Energy Districts: Introducing Additionality Assessment in Évora, Amsterdam and Espoo. Designs 2024, 8, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lampropoulos, G. Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, and Machine Learning in Industry 4.0. In Encyclopedia of Data Science and Machine Learning; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2023; pp. 2101–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Liao, M.; Zhang, R.; Yuan, X.; Zhu, Z.; Wu, Z. Quantum Computing as a Catalyst for Microgrid Management: Enhancing Decentralized Energy Systems Through Innovative Computational Techniques. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, A.; Ambainis, A.; Augustino, B.; Bärtschi, A.; Buhrman, H.; Coffrin, C.; Cortiana, G.; Dunjko, V.; Egger, D.J.; Elmegreen, B.G.; et al. Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Optimization. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2024, 6, 718–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mastroianni, C.; Plastina, F.; Scarcello, L.; Settino, J.; Vinci, A. Assessing Quantum Computing Performance for Energy Optimization in a Prosumer Community. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2024, 15, 444–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morstyn, T.; Wang, X. Opportunities for Quantum Computing within Net-Zero Power System Optimization. Joule 2024, 8, 1619–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adu Ansere, J.; Tran, D.T.; Dobre, O.A.; Shin, H.; Karagiannidis, G.K.; Duong, T.Q. Energy-Efficient Optimization for Mobile Edge Computing with Quantum Machine Learning. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2024, 13, 661–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Technology | Contribution to PEDs |
---|---|
CPS | Energy infrastructure real-time control |
IoT | Real-time data collection from buildings, devices, and environment |
Edge Computing | Low-latency processing and distributed decision-making |
AI | Intelligent optimization and forecasting |
Digital Twin | Simulation and monitoring of entire energy ecosystems |
Blockchain | Trust, security, and decentralization of energy transactions |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Siakas, D.; Lampropoulos, G.; Siakas, K. Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems Enabling Smart Positive Energy Districts. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 7502. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137502
Siakas D, Lampropoulos G, Siakas K. Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems Enabling Smart Positive Energy Districts. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(13):7502. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137502
Chicago/Turabian StyleSiakas, Dimitrios, Georgios Lampropoulos, and Kerstin Siakas. 2025. "Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems Enabling Smart Positive Energy Districts" Applied Sciences 15, no. 13: 7502. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137502
APA StyleSiakas, D., Lampropoulos, G., & Siakas, K. (2025). Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems Enabling Smart Positive Energy Districts. Applied Sciences, 15(13), 7502. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137502