Next Article in Journal
Influence of Frictional Stress Models on Simulation Results of High-Pressure Dense-Phase Pneumatic Conveying in Horizontal Pipe
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Study of the Surface Roughness, Hardness, and Absorption of an Injection-Molded Denture Base Polymer, Manufactured under Insufficient Mold Solidification
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Objective Optimization of Cyclone Separators Based on Geometrical Parameters for Performance Enhancement
Previous Article in Special Issue
Legibility of Sans-Serif Typeface on Different Paper Grades Made from Invasive Alien Plant Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact Fracture Resistance of Fused Deposition Models from Polylactic Acid with Respect to Infill Density and Sample Thickness

University of Zagreb Faculty of Graphic Arts, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(5), 2035; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14052035
Submission received: 26 January 2024 / Revised: 23 February 2024 / Accepted: 27 February 2024 / Published: 29 February 2024

Abstract

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is widely employed in prototyping due to its cost-effectiveness, speed, and ability to produce detailed and functional prototypes using a variety of materials. Simultaneously, consideration for the use of biodegradable polymers and a general reduction in their usage while enhancing the production of polymer-based products is at the forefront of sustainable practices and environmental consciousness. This study investigates the impact fracture resistance of FDM models fabricated from Polylactic Acid (PLA), examining the influence of infill density (50% and 100% infill) and sample thickness (2 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm). Optical microscopy, FTIR spectroscopy, and SEM analysis of PLA filament and fractured FDM PLA surfaces in impacted samples were conducted to ascertain the influence of process parameters on impact damage and failure mechanisms. The results indicate that a 100% infill profile with a 2 mm thickness should be avoided due to unpredictable behavior under impact. Conversely, a 5 mm thickness demonstrates significantly higher durability in comparison to a 50% infill profile. Optimal impact strength is observed in samples with a 3 mm thickness, suggesting potential material savings with 50% infill without compromising mechanical properties. The findings contribute valuable insights for refining FDM parameters and advancing the understanding of material behaviors in sustainable manufacturing practices.
Keywords: fused deposition modeling; polylactic acid; impact strength; fracture resistance; surface characterization; infill density; sample thickness; SEM; FT-IR; optical microscopy fused deposition modeling; polylactic acid; impact strength; fracture resistance; surface characterization; infill density; sample thickness; SEM; FT-IR; optical microscopy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Banić, D.; Itrić Ivanda, K.; Vukoje, M.; Cigula, T. Impact Fracture Resistance of Fused Deposition Models from Polylactic Acid with Respect to Infill Density and Sample Thickness. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2035. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14052035

AMA Style

Banić D, Itrić Ivanda K, Vukoje M, Cigula T. Impact Fracture Resistance of Fused Deposition Models from Polylactic Acid with Respect to Infill Density and Sample Thickness. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(5):2035. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14052035

Chicago/Turabian Style

Banić, Dubravko, Katarina Itrić Ivanda, Marina Vukoje, and Tomislav Cigula. 2024. "Impact Fracture Resistance of Fused Deposition Models from Polylactic Acid with Respect to Infill Density and Sample Thickness" Applied Sciences 14, no. 5: 2035. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14052035

APA Style

Banić, D., Itrić Ivanda, K., Vukoje, M., & Cigula, T. (2024). Impact Fracture Resistance of Fused Deposition Models from Polylactic Acid with Respect to Infill Density and Sample Thickness. Applied Sciences, 14(5), 2035. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14052035

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop