Next Article in Journal
A New Approach for Identifying Safety Improvement Sites on Rural Highways: A Validation Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Finite Element Analysis of Load-Bearing Characteristics and Design Method for New Composite-Anchor Uplift Piles
Previous Article in Journal
Analytical Solution of Ice–Rock-Model Stress Field and Stress Intensity Factors in Inhomogeneous Media
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Characterization and Disturbance Law of Key Parameters Influencing Deformation of Overlying Strata during Strip Filling in a Goaf
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Approach to Swell Mitigation: Machine-Learning-Powered Optimal Unit Weight and Stress Prediction in Expansive Soils

1
Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Gyor, Hungary
2
Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tishreen University, Latakia P.O. Box 2237, Syria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(4), 1411; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041411
Submission received: 9 January 2024 / Revised: 27 January 2024 / Accepted: 6 February 2024 / Published: 8 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Geotechnical Engineering)

Abstract

Expansive soils pose significant challenges to structural integrity, primarily due to volumetric changes that can lead to detrimental consequences and substantial economic losses. This study delves into the intricate dynamics of expansive soils through loaded swelling pressure experiments conducted under diverse conditions, encompassing variations in the sand content, initial dry unit weight, and initial degree of saturation. The findings underscore the pronounced influence of these factors on soil swelling. To address these challenges, a novel method leveraging machine learning prediction models is introduced, offering an efficient and cost-effective framework to mitigate potential hazards associated with expansive soils. Employing advanced algorithms such as decision tree regression (DTR), random forest regression (RFR), gradient boosting regression (GBR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector regression (SVR), and artificial neural networks (ANN) in the Python software 3.11 environment, this study aims to predict the optimal applied stress and dry unit weight required for soil swelling mitigation. Results reveal that XGBoost and ANN stand out for their precision and superior metrics. While both performed well, ANN demonstrated exceptional consistency across training and testing phases, making it the preferred choice. In the tested dataset, ANN achieved the highest R-squared values (0.9917 and 0.9954), lowest RMSE (7.92 and 0.086), and lowest MAE (5.872 and 0.0488) for predicting optimal applied stress and dry unit weight, respectively.
Keywords: clay; sand (additives); swelling pressure; loaded swelling pressure; partial saturation; machine learning clay; sand (additives); swelling pressure; loaded swelling pressure; partial saturation; machine learning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alnmr, A.; Ray, R.; Alzawi, M.O. A Novel Approach to Swell Mitigation: Machine-Learning-Powered Optimal Unit Weight and Stress Prediction in Expansive Soils. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 1411. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041411

AMA Style

Alnmr A, Ray R, Alzawi MO. A Novel Approach to Swell Mitigation: Machine-Learning-Powered Optimal Unit Weight and Stress Prediction in Expansive Soils. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(4):1411. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041411

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alnmr, Ammar, Richard Ray, and Mounzer Omran Alzawi. 2024. "A Novel Approach to Swell Mitigation: Machine-Learning-Powered Optimal Unit Weight and Stress Prediction in Expansive Soils" Applied Sciences 14, no. 4: 1411. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041411

APA Style

Alnmr, A., Ray, R., & Alzawi, M. O. (2024). A Novel Approach to Swell Mitigation: Machine-Learning-Powered Optimal Unit Weight and Stress Prediction in Expansive Soils. Applied Sciences, 14(4), 1411. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041411

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop