Improved Bio-Oil Quality from Pyrolysis of Pine Biomass in Pressurized Hydrogen
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Raw Materials
2.2. Experimental Device and Process
2.3. Detection and Characterization of Bio-Oil
2.3.1. Calculation of Yield
2.3.2. Elemental Analysis, Determination of H/C, and Heating Value
2.3.3. Thermogravimetry (TG) Analysis
2.3.4. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Yield of Pyrolysis Products
3.2. Elemental Analysis of Pyrolysis Oil
3.3. H/C and Heating Value
3.4. TGA Analysis of Bio-Oil
3.5. GC-MS Analysis of the Bio-Oil
4. Conclusions
- The yield of pyrolysis oil in a hydrogen atmosphere is 59.23%, which is higher than that (40.88%) in a nitrogen atmosphere, and the solid product is reduced from 26.02% in a nitrogen atmosphere to 20.41% in a hydrogen atmosphere. The carbon content of pyrolysis bio-oil obtained under hydrogen is basically unchanged. Oxygen decreased from 21.34% to 17.16%, hydrogen increased from 5.17% to 7.06%, the H/C ratio increased from 0.072 to 0.098, and the heating value increased from 27.75 MJ/kg to 31.40 MJ/kg;
- In the hydrogenated pyrolysis of bio-oil, the content of compounds with a boiling point of 0–200 °C is 63.21%, while in a nitrogen atmosphere, the content of components within the boiling point range is 55.11%. Therefore, the low boiling point fraction of pyrolysis bio-oil can be improved in a hydrogen atmosphere, which is conducive to improving the combustion characteristics of pyrolysis oil;
- By comparison, the biomass pyrolysis oil changed obviously in the hydrogen atmosphere. Ethyl hexadecanoate (peak area percentage 19.1%) and methyl octadecanoate (peak area percentage 15.42%) were obtained. The number of phenols decreased from 33.66% to 28.38%. Pyrolysis in a hydrogen atmosphere inhibited its aromatization and reduced the side chain reaction of the benzene ring. The content of esters increased significantly in the hydrogen atmosphere, and acids increased from 0.45% in the nitrogen atmosphere to 1.65% in the hydrogen atmosphere. It is mainly hexadecanoic acid, nineteenth acid, ethanol, and methanol. Therefore, esterification occurred in the pyrolysis process, resulting in the formation of long-chain esters and reducing the acidity of pyrolysis bio-oil.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lu, J.; Wat, J.; Liu, Z.; Wu, Y.; Yang, M. Elemental migration and transformation during hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 423, 126961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, Q.; Zhou, M.; Li, W.; Wang, X.; Cui, M.; Yang, Y. Catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass with noble metal-like catalysts to produce high-grade bio-oil. Analytical Py-GC/MS study. Catal. Today 2018, 302, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, N.; Hills, C.; Singh, R. Biomass waste utilisation in low-carbon products: Harnessing a major potential resource. NPJ Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2019, 2, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, T.; Li, B.; Xu, Y.; Ma, L. Efficient upgrading process for production of low quality fuel from bio-oil. Fuel 2016, 179, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, X.; Liu, Z.; Norbeck, J.; Park, C.S. A simple kinetic analysis of syngas during steam hydrogasification of biomass using a novel inverted batch reactor with instant high pressure feeding. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 200, 731–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Qiang, S.; Wang, W. Experimental and techno-economic studies of upgrading heavy pyrolytic oils from wood chips into valuable fuels. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 277, 124136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Figueirêdoa, M.; Venderboschb, R.; Heeresa, H.; Deuss, P. In-depth structural characterization of the lignin fraction of a pine-derived pyrolysis oil. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2020, 149, 104837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staš, M.; Auersvald, M.; Kejla, L.; Vrtiška, D.; Kroufek, J.; Kubička, D. Quantitative analysis of pyrolysis bio-oils. A review. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 126, 115857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaffar, M.; Nahil, M.; Williams, P. Methane production from the pyrolysis-catalytic hydrogenation of waste biomass: Influence of process conditions and catalyst type. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 7443–7457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahamed, T.; Anto, S.; Mathimani, T.; Brindhadevi, K.; Pugazhendhi, A. Upgrading of bio-oil from thermochemical conversion of various biomass—Mechanism, challenges and opportunities. Fuel 2021, 287, 119329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, D.; Yang, X.; Li, R.; Wu, Y. Environmental impact comparison of typical and resource-efficient biomass fast pyrolysis systems based on LCA and Aspen Plus simulation. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandler, D.; Resende, F. Comparison between catalytic fast pyrolysis and catalytic fast hydropyrolysis for the production of liquid fuels in a fluidized bed reactor. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 3199–3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saidi, M.; Moradi, P. Catalytic hydrotreatment of lignin-derived pyrolysis bio-oils using Cu/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. Reaction network development and kinetic study of anisole upgrading. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 8267–8284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaihad, N.; Situmorang, Y.; Anniwaer, A.; Kurnia, I.; Karnjanakom, S.; Kasai, Y.; Abudula, A.; Reubroycharoen, P.; Guan, G. Preparation of various hierarchical HZSM-5 based catalysts for in-situ fast upgrading of bio-oil. Renew. Energy 2021, 169, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arazo, R.; Capareda, S.; Ofrasio, B.; Ido, A.; Chen, W.; Luna, M. Low-temperature catalytic conversion of alkaline sewage sludge bio-oil to biodiesel: Product characteristics and reaction mechanisms. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Y.; Wang, F.; Djandja, J.; Zhang, S.; Xu, Y.; Duan, P. Hydrothermal liquefaction of crop straws: Effect of feedstock composition. Fuel 2020, 265, 116946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Han, D.; Zhao, Y.; Li, R.; Wu, Y. Environmental evaluation of a distributed-centralized biomass pyrolysis system. Total Environ. 2020, 716, 136915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zheng, N.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J. Parametric study of two-stage hydropyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass for production of gaseous and light aromatic hydrocarbons. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Zheng, N.; Wang, J. Comparative investigation of rice husk, thermoplastic bituminous coal and liquid products during hydropyrolysis/co-hydropyrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 268, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, J.; Wu, J.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Wu, Y. Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae over mesoporous silicabased materials with site-separated acids and bases. Fuel 2020, 279, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Kumar, J.; Bhaskar, T. Utilization of lignin: A sustainable and eco-friendly approach. J. Energy Inst. 2020, 93, 235–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, S.; Ru, B.; Lin, H.; Sun, W.; Luo, Z. Pyrolysis behaviors of four lignin polymers isolated from the same pine wood. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 182, 120–127. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, D.; Zhang, S.; Fu, H.; Chen, J. Liquefaction of macroalgae enteromorpha prolifera in sub-/supercritical alcohols: Direct production of ester compounds. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 2342–2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neutelings, G. Lignin variability in plant cell walls: Contribution of new models. Plant Sci. 2011, 181, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, L.; Xu, C.; Champagne, P. Overview of recent advances in thermo-chemical conversion of biomass. Energy Convers. Manag. 2010, 51, 969–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haruo, K.; Sunao, H.; Shiro, S. Effects of side-chain hydroxyl groups on pyrolytic β-ether cleavage of phenolic lignin model dimer. J. Wood Sci. 2007, 53, 268–271. [Google Scholar]
Elemental Analysis (%) | Proximate Analysis (%) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | H | N | S | O | Moisture | Volatiles | Fixed Carbon | Ash Content |
47.10 | 5.89 | 0.36 | 0.01 | 43.93 | 2.03 | 71.41 | 19.21 | 2.72 |
Bio-Oil in Nitrogen Atmosphere | Bio-Oil in Hydrogen Atmosphere | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time/Min | Component | Peak Area % | Time/Min | Component | Peak Area % |
3.07 | Aceticacid, hydrazide | 9.91 | 3.24 | Toluene | 5.42 |
3.18 | Butanoicacid, 2-methyl-, methylester | 1.83 | 4.88 | Furfural | 1.05 |
4.03 | 2-Pentanone, 4-hydroxy-4-methyl- | 0.48 | 5.64 | Ethylbenzene | 1.78 |
4.79 | Styrene | 0.98 | 5.85 | Benzene, 1,3-dimethyl- | 1.89 |
5.78 | 2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-methyl- | 1.41 | 8.16 | Benzene, 1,2,3-trimethyl- | 1.11 |
5.99 | 2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-methyl- | 0.36 | 8.77 | Phenol | 4.19 |
6.15 | Phenol | 12.7 | 9.27 | Butanoicacid, anhydride | 0.96 |
6.49 | 3-Phenyl-1-propanol, acetate | 0.55 | 9.32 | Ethanol, 2,2-oxybis-, diacetate | 0.65 |
6.55 | Benzofuran | 0.83 | 9.76 | 1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3-methyl- | 1.01 |
7.36 | Indene | 2.27 | 9.88 | Indane | 0.72 |
7.40 | Phenol, 2-methyl- | 3.5 | 10.36 | Phenol, 2-methyl- | 1.83 |
7.57 | Aceticacid, phenylester | 0.79 | 10.83 | Phenol, 3-methyl- | 3.96 |
7.73 | Phenol, 2-methyl- | 6.79 | 11.09 | Phenol, 2-methoxy- | 3.09 |
8.32 | Cinnamaldehyde | 0.58 | 11.42 | 3-Pentanol, 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl- | 0.51 |
8.93 | Phenol, 2,3-dimethyl- | 1.4 | 12.33 | Lacticacid, 2-methyl-, monoanhydride | 2.14 |
9.06 | 1H-Indene, 3-methyl- | 0.47 | 12.37 | Phenol, 2,5-dimethyl- | 1.01 |
9.63 | Azulene | 7.84 | 12.71 | Phenol, 4-ethyl- | 0.41 |
9.85 | Benzofuran, 2,3-dihydro- | 1.03 | 12.76 | Phenol, 2,3-dimethyl- | 1.31 |
9.98 | Benzofuran, 2,3-dihydro- | 0.69 | 13.10 | Naphthalene | 6.81 |
11.28 | Naphthalene, 1-methyl- | 1.97 | 13.24 | Creosol | 2.87 |
11.54 | Bicyclo(4.4.1) undeca-1,3,5,7,9-pentae | 2.8 | 13.42 | Catechol | 2.59 |
12.35 | 1,2-Benzenediol, diacetate | 0.49 | 14.90 | Phenol, 4-ethyl-2-methoxy- | 1.79 |
12.45 | Biphenyl | 0.55 | 15.12 | 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-methyl- | 1.2 |
13.01 | Naphthalene, 1,3-dimethyl- | 0.36 | 15.23 | Naphthalene, 2-methyl- | 1.54 |
13.14 | Acenaphthene | 1.25 | 15.54 | Naphthalene, 2-methyl- | 0.66 |
13.44 | Biphenylene | 2.52 | 16.50 | Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-propyl- | 0.52 |
15.07 | Hexane, 3,3-dimethyl- | 0.52 | 16.75 | Biphenyl | 0.87 |
15.12 | Fluorene | 0.61 | 17.92 | trans-Isoeugenol | 0.76 |
15.64 | Fluorene | 0.37 | 20.17 | Fluorene | 1.52 |
17.42 | Anthracene | 2.34 | 23.12 | Anthracene | 2.11 |
17.53 | 9H-Fluorene, 9-methylene- | 0.63 | 25.34 | n-Hexadecanoicacid | 1.14 |
19.12 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylicacid | 0.29 | 25.80 | Hexadecanoicacid, ethylester | 19.1 |
20.54 | Fluoranthene | 0.28 | 27.78 | Octadecanoicacid | 0.51 |
20.84 | Fluoranthene | 0.51 | 28.19 | Octadecanoicacid, 17-methyl-, methyl | 15.46 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Lu, J.; Yang, M.; Wu, Y. Improved Bio-Oil Quality from Pyrolysis of Pine Biomass in Pressurized Hydrogen. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010046
Wang J, Wang S, Lu J, Yang M, Wu Y. Improved Bio-Oil Quality from Pyrolysis of Pine Biomass in Pressurized Hydrogen. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(1):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010046
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Jingliang, Shanshan Wang, Jianwen Lu, Mingde Yang, and Yulong Wu. 2022. "Improved Bio-Oil Quality from Pyrolysis of Pine Biomass in Pressurized Hydrogen" Applied Sciences 12, no. 1: 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010046
APA StyleWang, J., Wang, S., Lu, J., Yang, M., & Wu, Y. (2022). Improved Bio-Oil Quality from Pyrolysis of Pine Biomass in Pressurized Hydrogen. Applied Sciences, 12(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010046