Assessment of Fit on Ten Screw-Retained FrameworksRealized through Digital Full-Arch Implant Impression
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chochlidakis, K.M.; Papaspyridakos, P.; Geminiani, A.; Chen, C.J.; Feng, I.J.; Ercoli, C. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016, 116, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granata, S.; Giberti, L.; Vigolo, P.; Stellini, E.; Di Fiore, A. Incorporating a facial scanner into the digital workflow: A dental technique. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020, 123, 781–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Fiore, A.; Vigolo, P.; Graiff, L.; Stellini, E. Digital vs Conventional Workflow for Screw-Retained Single-Implant Crowns: A Comparison of Key Considerations. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2018, 31, 577–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malaguti, G.; Rossi, R.; Marziali, B.; Esposito, A.; Bruno, G.; Dariol, C.; Di Fiore, A. In vitro evaluation of prosthodontic impression on natural dentition: A comparison between traditional and digital techniques. Oral. Implantol. (Rome) 2017, 14, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Di Fiore, A.; Monaco, C.; Brunello, G.; Granata, S.; Stellini, E.; Yilmaz, B. Automatic Digital Design of the Occlusal Anatomy of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Compared to Dental Technicians’ Digital Waxing: A Controlled Clinical Trial. J. Prosthodont. 2021, 30, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceruso, F.M.; Barnaba, P.; Mazzoleni, S.; Ottria, L.; Gargari, M.; Zuccon, A.; Bruno, G.; Di Fiore, A. Implant-abutment connections on single crowns: A systematic review. Oral. Implantol. (Rome) 2017, 10, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Di Fiore, A.; Meneghello, R.; Graiff, L.; Savio, G.; Vigolo, P.; Monaco, C.; Stellini, E. Full arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2019, 63, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mangano, F.G.; Admakin, O.; Bonacina, M.; Lerner, H.; Rutkunas, V.; Mangano, C. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: A comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral. Health 2020, 20, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bilmenoglu, C.; Cilingir, A.; Geckili, O.; Bilhan, H.; Bilgin, T. In vitro comparison of trueness of 10 intraoral scanners for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020, 124, 755–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çakmak, G.; Yilmaz, H.; Treviño, A.; Kökat, A.M.; Yilmaz, B. The effect of scanner type and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2020, 22, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mizumoto, R.M.; Yilmaz, B.; McGlumphy, E.A., Jr.; Seidt, J.; Johnston, W.M. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020, 123, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mizumoto, R.M.; Alp, G.; Özcan, M.; Yilmaz, B. The effect of scanning the palate and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch implant scans. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2019, 21, 987–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mennito, A.S.; Evans, Z.P.; Nash, J.; Bocklet, C.; Lauer, K.A.; Bacro, T.; Cayouette, M.; Ludlow, M.; Renne, W.G. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2019, 31, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Monaco, C.; Arena, A.; Pallotti, G.; di Fiore, A.; Scheda, L. Digital bar prototype technique for full-arch rehabilitation on implants. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2019, 150, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Di Fiore, A.; Meneghello, R.; Savio, G.; Sivolella, S.; Katsoulis, J.; Stellini, E. In Vitro Implant Impression Accuracy Using a New Photopolymerizing SDR Splinting Material. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2015, 17 (Suppl. S2), e721–e729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adell, R.; Eriksson, B.; Lekholm, U.; Brånemark, P.; Jemt, T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 1990, 5, 347–359. [Google Scholar]
- Jemt, T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implant in the edentulous jaw: A study of treatment from the time of prostheses placement to the first annual check-up. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 1991, 6, 270–276. [Google Scholar]
- Gherlone, E.; Capparé, P.; Vinci, R.; Ferrini, F.; Gastaldi, G.; Crespi, R. Conventional Versus Digital Impressions for “All-on-Four” Restorations. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 2016, 31, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cappare, P.; Sannino, G.; Minoli, M.; Montemezzi, P.; Ferrini, F. Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2019, 16, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chochlidakis, K.; Papaspyridakos, P.; Tsigarida, A.; Romeo, D.; Chen, Y.W.; Natto, Z.; Ercoli, C. Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae. J. Prosthodont. 2020, 29, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abduo, J.; Bennani, V.; Waddell, N.; Lyons, K.; Swain, M. Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: A critical review. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 2010, 25, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Jemt, T. In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implant supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 1996, 11, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Kan, J.Y.; Rungcharassaeng, K.; Bohsali, K.; Goodacre, C.J.; Lang, B.R. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1999, 81, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pesce, P.; Pera, F.; Setti, P.; Menini, M. Precision and Accuracy of a Digital Impression Scanner in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2018, 31, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yanase, R.; Binon, P.; Jemt, T.; Gulbransen, H.; Parel, S. How do you test a cast framework fit for a full-arch fixed implant supported prosthesis? Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 1994, 9, 469–474. [Google Scholar]
- Di Fiore, A.; De Francesco, M.; Monaco, C.; Stocco, E.; Vigolo, P.; Stellini, E. Comparison of accuracy of single crowns generated from digital and conventional impressions: An in vivo controlled trial. J. Osseointegr. 2019, 11, 107–112. [Google Scholar]
- Ferrini, F.; Sannino, G.; Chiola, C.; Capparé, P.; Gastaldi, G.; Gherlone, E.F. Influence of Intra-Oral Scanner (I.O.S.) on The Marginal Accuracy of CAD/CAM Single Crowns. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2019, 16, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menini, M.; Setti, P.; Pera, F.; Pera, P.; Pesce, P. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: Traditional techniques versus a digital procedure. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2018, 22, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Framework | Implant 1 (μm) | Implant 2 (μm) | Implant 3 (μm) | Implant 4 (μm) | Implant 5 (μm) | Implant 6 (μm) | Mean (μm) | SD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 35 | 33 | 44 | 45 | 38 | 33 | 38 | 5 |
2 | 43 | 39 | 46 | 51 | 44 | 41 | 44 | 4 |
3 | 35 | 33 | 42 | 45 | 36 | 38 | 38 | 5 |
4 | 38 | 35 | 36 | 33 | 33 | 35 | 35 | 2 |
5 | 40 | 39 | 48 | 44 | 38 | 37 | 41 | 4 |
6 | 28 | 31 | 39 | 41 | 33 | 30 | 34 | 5 |
7 | 30 | 32 | 39 | 51 | 37 | 33 | 37 | 8 |
8 | 31 | 31 | 44 | 41 | 29 | 30 | 34 | 6 |
9 | 32 | 34 | 41 | 40 | 37 | 36 | 37 | 3 |
10 | 44 | 38 | 40 | 53 | 43 | 45 | 44 | 5 |
Mean | 35 | 34 | 42 | 45 | 37 | 36 | ||
SD | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
De Francesco, M.; Stellini, E.; Granata, S.; Mazzoleni, S.; Ludovichetti, F.S.; Monaco, C.; Di Fiore, A. Assessment of Fit on Ten Screw-Retained FrameworksRealized through Digital Full-Arch Implant Impression. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5617. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125617
De Francesco M, Stellini E, Granata S, Mazzoleni S, Ludovichetti FS, Monaco C, Di Fiore A. Assessment of Fit on Ten Screw-Retained FrameworksRealized through Digital Full-Arch Implant Impression. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(12):5617. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125617
Chicago/Turabian StyleDe Francesco, Maurizio, Edoardo Stellini, Stefano Granata, Sergio Mazzoleni, Francesco Saverio Ludovichetti, Carlo Monaco, and Adolfo Di Fiore. 2021. "Assessment of Fit on Ten Screw-Retained FrameworksRealized through Digital Full-Arch Implant Impression" Applied Sciences 11, no. 12: 5617. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125617
APA StyleDe Francesco, M., Stellini, E., Granata, S., Mazzoleni, S., Ludovichetti, F. S., Monaco, C., & Di Fiore, A. (2021). Assessment of Fit on Ten Screw-Retained FrameworksRealized through Digital Full-Arch Implant Impression. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5617. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125617