Next Article in Journal
Optimisation of a Heat Source for Infrared Thermography Measurements: Comparison to Mehler Engineering + Service-Heater
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Titania Synthesized by Pulsed Laser Ablation on the State of Platinum during Ammonia Oxidation
Previous Article in Journal
Networking Historic Environmental Standards to Address Modern Challenges for Sustainable Conservation in HBIM
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Confirmation of Initial Stable Adsorption Structures of Leucine and Tyrosine Adsorbed on a Cu(110) Surface

1
Department of Chemistry, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea
2
Department of Chemistry, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(4), 1284; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041284
Submission received: 17 January 2020 / Revised: 10 February 2020 / Accepted: 11 February 2020 / Published: 14 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS))

Abstract

:
The structures and stability levels of leucine (Leu) and tyrosine (Tyr) adsorbed on a Cu(110) surface, at initial levels of coverage (less than 0.25 monolayer), were investigated using reflection–absorption infrared spectroscopy and high-resolution photoemission spectroscopy (HRPES), as well as by performing density functional theory calculations. At an initial coverage, the O–H dissociation bonded structure was indicated from the spectral results to be the most favorable structure for Leu adsorbed on the Cu(110) surface, whereas the O–H dissociated-N dative bonded structure was most favorable for adsorbed Tyr. These models were further supported by the results of experiments, in which the systems were exposed to other molecules and HRPES was used to monitor whether the amine or carboxylic groups of the adsorbed amino acids became reactive.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In the field of surface science, research on the interactions between biomolecules, including their various functional groups (-NH2, -COOH, -OH, and -SH), and substrates is focused on determining which structure is the most stable adsorption structure during initial coverage because these structures are important for practical applications, such as biosensors and bio-selective chips [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Notably, the adsorption structures of amino acids have yielded versatile applications because they include various functional groups, all containing a carboxyl group (-COOH) and an amino group (-NH2) [8,9]. Previous studies of high-resolution photoemission spectroscopy (HRPES) and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), as well as the density functional theory (DFT), have noted that the O–H dissociated-N dative bonded structure (with the carboxylate oxygen atoms and the nitrogen atom participating in the adsorption) and O–H dissociation bonded structure (with only the carboxylate oxygen atoms participating in the adsorption) are generally the stable adsorption features for amino acids on a Ge(100) surface, depending on the their adsorbed coverages [10,11,12,13].
To determine how adsorption structures depend on the substrate (semiconductor or metal), the adsorption structures of the amino acids leucine (Leu) and tyrosine (Tyr) on a Cu(110) surface at initial coverage were acquired. A previous STM study revealed the O–H dissociation bonded structure to be the most stable adsorption structure of most amino acids adsorbed on the Cu(110) surface [14]. As the carboxylate group has two equivalent oxygen atoms, they adsorb on the Cu(110) surface in two equivalent manners. For this specific purpose, a comparative investigation of the adsorption of Leu and Tyr on a Cu(110) surface at low coverage for clarifying the stable structure—less than 0.25 monolayer (ML)—was carried out using various surface analysis tools, such as reflection–absorption infrared spectroscopy (RAIRS), HRPES, and DFT calculations.

2. Materials and Methods

The cleaning of a Cu(110) surface (10 × 10 × 1 mm) was carried out using several cycles of Ar+ ion sputtering at 1 keV for 20 min per cycle at 700 K, followed by an additional annealing process at 1100 K for 20 min. The level of cleanliness of the Cu(110) surface was confirmed using low-energy electron diffraction measurements of pristine Cu(110) surface. L-leucine (Leu; C3H7NO2, <99% purity; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) and L-tyrosine (Tyr; C9H11NO3, <99% purity; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) were purchased and further purified by several sublimation cycles to remove contaminated impurity prior to the adsorption experiments.
RAIRS spectra were obtained using a NICOLET 6700 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, US), which was equipped with liquid nitrogen (LN2)-cooled MCT (Mercury-Cadmium-Telluride). All RAIR spectra of the specimen were measured at less than 1 × 10−10 Torr, referring to a background single-beam spectrum recorded on pristine Cu(110) surface. Each spectrum with a spectral range of 800–3200 cm−1 was obtained at a resolution of 4 cm−1 by averaging 500 scans.
The C 1s, N 1s, and O 1s core-level spectra included in amino acids molecules were acquired using HRPES equipped at the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (10D HRPES-I beamline) with photon energies of 340, 460, and 590 eV to increase the surface sensitivity factors. Their binding energies were corrected by that of the pure Au 4f core-level spectrum (84.0 eV) for the identical photon energy. The base pressure of the chamber was maintained under ultra-high vacuum condition (below 9.5 × 10−11 Torr). The three core-level spectra were carefully fitted with Voigt functions to analyze the bonding configurations [15]. The 1.0 ML of Leu and Tyr coverage was defined as the maximum density at which they can be deposited on a Cu(110) surface without yielding the N 1s core-level peak at 399.1 (±0.1) eV characteristic of multilayer formation.
DFT calculations were also performed to predict the adsorption energies of Leu and Tyr on the Cu(110) surface. All DFT adsorption energy was calculated by using the JAGUAR 9.1 software package, which applied a hybrid density functional method and included Becke’s three-parameter nonlocal exchange functional with Lee, Yang, and Parr nonlocal correlation functional (B3LYP) [16]. In these calculations, we considered four-dimer (Cu35H32) cluster models. For the determination of the geometries corresponding to the important local minima on the potential energy surface, we applied a mixed basis set that uses the LACVP basis set to describe Cu atoms and the 6–31 G basis set to describe the remaining atoms developed by Hay and Wadt [17]. In detail, the upper layer structure of Cu atoms allowed the atoms of the adsorbate to relax because the adsorption proceeded directly, and the optimization energy was calculated by fixing the lower layer of Cu atoms. Each calculated energy value was obtained with the minimum value and the geometry was chosen. We also verified the local minimum and transition states in each calculation.

3. Results

The RAIR spectra of Leu were first acquired at a low coverage of ~0.20 ML on the Cu(110) surface at a relatively low coverage, as shown in Figure 1a. For molecules in general, their adsorption geometries can only be predicted by assigning the vibrational absorption bands associated with each of the main functional groups in the tested molecules (e.g., the COO-, -NH2, -CH3, and -CH- groups) as shown in Scheme 1. If all the bands in an RAIR spectrum can be analyzed to the functional groups of the molecule, then one can conclude that the molecule is adsorbed intact.
The RAIR spectrum of Leu clearly showed a band at 1653 cm−1, which was because of the asymmetric deformation mode of the NH2 group. Therefore, it is suggested that the amine group participated in the adsorption on the Cu(110) surface at low coverage. However, an NH2+ peak was not observed, because the plane of the NH2+ group was, according to previous work, lying parallel to the surface [18]. Generally, the carboxylate group will give rise to two vibrational absorption features corresponding to the asymmetric and symmetric COO- stretching modes occurring at 1620–1540 cm−1 and 1420–1300 cm−1, respectively. However, in the obtained RAIR spectrum of the Cu(110) surface at low coverage of Leu, only the band at 1419 cm−1 assigned to symmetric COO- stretching mode was observed. This result indicated that the two oxygen atoms in the carboxylate group are equidistant to the surface, which may be involved in the binding on the surface, resulting in making the stretch dipole of COO- to be inactive. A band at 2915 cm−1 was also observed, and it may have been caused by the CH stretching modes—in particular, because these groups were slightly tilted from the normal position to the Cu(110) surface. Taken together, these RAIRS observations could support the adoption of the O–H dissociation bonded structure by Leu at low coverage on the Cu(110) surface.
Following the same method, RAIR spectra of Tyr on the Cu(110) surface at low coverage were obtained, as displayed in Figure 1b. Here, vibrations arose from the carboxylate (COO-) and amino (NH2) groups. However, a peak at 1592 cm−1, corresponding to the asymmetric deformation mode of the NH2 group, did not appear. Additionally, while the COO- stretching mode at 1439 cm−1 was observed, the asymmetric vas (COO-) stretch was not found, and these results are similar to those for Leu, suggesting that the two carboxylate oxygen atoms of Tyr also bound equidistantly to the Cu(110) surface. These differential observations taken together were consistent with the appearance of the O–H dissociated-N dative bonded structure for Tyr at low coverage on the Cu(110) surface.
To determine the electronic structures of the two adsorbed amino acids and, hence, the most favorable adsorption structures, high-resolution core-level spectra were obtained for Leu and Tyr adsorbed on the Cu(110) surface at a low coverage of ~0.20 ML (Figure 2). Their C 1s, N 1s, and O 1s core-level spectra were specifically acquired and analyzed using HRPES.
Four chemically distinct types of carbon were determined to be present on the Cu(110) surface exposed to ~0.20 ML Leu, according to its C 1s core-level spectrum, as seen in Figure 2a. Considering the relationship between electronegativity and binding energy, the peaks at 284.5, 283.7, 285.6, and 287.9 eV, labeled as C1, C2, C3, and C4, were assigned to -CH(CH3)2, -CH2, -CH-NH2, and a deprotonated carboxyl carbon (-COO-), respectively. Figure 2d displays the deconvoluted spectrum of the C 1s core-level region after adsorption of ~0.20 ML Tyr on the Cu(110) surface. As seen, we observed the presence of five chemically distinct types of carbon on the Cu(110) surface. The strongest peak appeared at 284.9 eV, assigned to the aromatic ring of Tyr, labeled C5 (-C6H5-). Four other peaks were assigned corresponding to CH2- (283.7 eV: C6), C-NH2 (285.3 eV: C7), COO- (288.4 eV: C8), and C-OH (287.1 eV: C9), respectively. These observations suggested the presence of an electronically neutral (C3 and N1) amine group for Leu but a positively charged (C7 and N2) form of the amine for Tyr [19].
Concurrently, the changes in the N 1s and O 1s core-level spectra at the ~0.20 ML level of coverage were determined using the same methods for the two amino acids adsorbed on the Cu(110) surface. The N 1s core-level spectrum of ~0.2 ML Leu on the Cu(110) surface in Figure 2b showed a single peak at 398.5 eV (marked as N1). Considering the binding energy, N1 was assigned to the neutral N atom in the Leu molecule [20,21,22]. The N 1s core-level spectrum obtained for ~0.20 ML Tyr adsorbed on the Cu(110) surface, as in Figure 2e, also showed a single peak, but at 400.5 eV. This result was indicative of the N-dative bonding structure for the adsorbed Tyr.
Finally, the O 1s peaks of the adsorbed Leu and Tyr molecules were determined and compared. Figure 2c shows the O 1s core-level spectrum obtained after deposition of ~0.20 ML Leu on the Cu(110) surface. Both oxygen atoms of Leu adsorbed equivalently on the Cu(110) surface, as indicated by the O 1s spectrum showing a single peak (marked as O1 at 530.5 eV). This equivalent adsorption was apparently a result of the Cu(110) surface having an equivalent dimer. The O 1s core-level spectrum of Tyr on the Cu(110) surface, shown in Figure 2f, was found to display two oxygen peaks: one peak (marked as O2 at 530.9 eV) being similar to that for Leu and corresponding to the two deprotonated carboxyl oxygens adsorbed equivalently on the Cu(110) surface and the other peak (marked as O3 at 532.9 eV) being the phenol oxygen. In previous experiments of Leu adsorbed on a Ge(100) surface, the O 1s peaks were divided into two components, O–Ge and -C=O, which could be done because of the chemical inequivalence of the oxygen atoms in such Leu resulting from the zwitterionic character of the Ge(100) surface [13,23]. The analyses of the C 1s, N 1s, and O 1s core-level high-resolution photoelectron spectra taken together revealed that, at low coverage, the Leu adsorbed on the Cu(110) surface adopted the O–H dissociation bonded structure, whereas the Tyr system showed the O–H dissociated-N dative bonded structure.
DFT calculations were also performed to determine the most stable adsorption structural features of Leu and Tyr on the Cu(110) and their corresponding adsorption energies. The same calculation procedure was employed for both amino acid molecules. Figure 3 shows these two DFT-optimized structural features from the front and top, with respect to calculating the adsorption energies. As shown in Figure 3, the O–H dissociation bonded structure, containing a neutral N, was calculated to be the most stable adsorption structure for Leu on the Cu(110) surface, with an Eads of −45.23 kcal/mol, rather than the O–H dissociated-N dative bonded structure with Eads of −19.86 kcal/mol, as seen Figure 3a,c. Taking into account the stability of the structure of Leu adsorbed on the Cu(110) surface, as predicted using the DFT calculations, together with the experimental HRPES results, the O–H dissociation bonded structure was found to be most stable for Leu in the low-coverage regime. Using the same method, the adsorption structure of Tyr on the Cu(110) surface was also calculated.
In contrast to the case of Leu, the O–H dissociated-N dative bonded structure, containing a charged N and calculated using DFT, was found to be the more stable structure for Tyr on Cu(110), with an Eads of −38.76 kcal/mol, rather than the O–H dissociation bonded structure, with an Eads of −24.34 kcal/mol, as seen Figure 3b,d. These results clearly show the O–H dissociated-N dative bonded structure to be preferred for the adsorption structure of Tyr. Additionally, clear illustration of the difference for the O-H dissociation bonded structure of Leucine versus the O-H dissociated –N dative bonded structure with a charged N for Tyrosine was shown in Figure 3e.

4. Conclusions

The structures of leucine and tyrosine adsorbed at a low coverage on a Cu(110) surface were determined using RAIRS, HRPES, and DFT. The results revealed that the amine and carboxyl groups of Leu and Tyr concurrently participated in this adsorption. It is concluded that the O–H dissociation bonded structure is the most favorable structure for Leu initially adsorbed on a Cu(110) surface, whereas the O–H dissociated-N dative bonded structure is the most favorable structure for an adsorbed Tyr. As we observed, low coverage of the adsorption ssceme tructure of amino acids on a Cu(110) surface can support the conventional chemical reactions be applied in recently emerging biomedical applications. Conclusively, we confirm that our approach of a comparative study of initial adsorption structures for amino acids will be extended by practical industrial applications using amino acids adsorptions, such as bio-related science and bio-engineering.

Author Contributions

H.S.K. and H.L. performed the experiments; H.S.K. and H.L. analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (No. 2017R1A2A2A05001140).

Acknowledgments

We thank Y. R. Son for help in drawing the graphical abstract.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bent, S.F. Organic Functionalization of Group IV Semiconductor Surfaces: Principles, Examples, Applications, and Prospects. Surf. Sci. 2002, 500, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Loscutoff, P.W.; Bent, S.F. Reactivity of the Germanium Surface: Chemical Passivation and Functionalization. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2006, 57, 467–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hamers, R.J. Formation and Characterization of Organic Monolayers on Semiconductor Surfaces. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2008, 1, 707–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Whaley, S.R.; English, D.S.; Hu, E.L.; Barbara, P.F.; Belcher, A.M. Selection of peptides with semiconductor binding specificity for directed nanocrystal assembly. Nature 2000, 405, 665–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Goede, K.; Busch, P.; Grundmann, M. Binding Specificity of a Peptide on Semiconductor Surfaces. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 2115–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schiffrin, A.; Riemann, A.; Auwarter, W.; Pennec, Y.; Iber-Bargioni, A.; Cvetko, D.; Cossaro, A.; Morgante, A.; Barth, J.V. Zwitterionic self-assembly of L-methionine nanogratings on the Ag(111) surface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 5279–5284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Leftwich, T.; Teplyakov, A.V. Chemical manipulation of multifunctional hydrocarbons on silicon surfaces. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2007, 63, 1–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Barlow, S.M.; Raval, R. Complex organic molecules at metal surfaces: Bonding, organisation and chirality. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2003, 50, 201–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Crivillers, N.; Osella, S.; Van Dyck, C.; Lazzerini, G.M.; Cornil, D.; Liscio, A.; Di Stasio, F.; Mian, S.; Fenwick, O.; Reinders, F.; et al. Large Work Function Shift of Gold Induced by a Novel Perfluorinated Azobenzene-Based Self-Assembled Monolayer. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 432–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, H.; Youn, Y.-S.; Kim, S. Coverage Dependence of the Adsorption Structure of Alanine on Ge(100). Langmuir 2009, 25, 12574–12577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, S.; Kim, Y.; Park, S.; Kim, K.-j.; Lee, H. Coverage Dependent Variation of Adsorption Configurations of Methionine on Ge(100). Chem. Asian J. 2011, 6, 2362–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lim, H.; Yang, S.; Lee, M.; Kim, S.; Lee, H. Variation of Adsorption Geometries by the Influence of Nucleophilicity among p-CPA, p-TPA, and p-NPA on Ge(100) Surfaces. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 578, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, S.; Lim, H.; Park, E.H.; Kim, Y.; Min, Y.H.; Lee, H.-S.; Kim, S.; Lee, H. Comparison and Contrast Analysis of Adsorption Geometries of Phenylalanine versus Tyrosine on Ge(100): The Effect of Nucleophilic Group on the Surface. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 25840–25845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Antonio, L.; Barbosa, M.M.; Sautet, P. Stability of Chiral Domains Produced by Adsorption of Tartaric Acid Isomers on the Cu(110) Surface:  A Periodic Density Functional Theory Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6639–6648. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schreier, F. The Voigt and complex error function: A comparison of computational methods. J. Quant. Spectros. Radiat. Transf. 1992, 48, 743–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R.G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hay, P.J.; Wadt, W.R. Ab initio effective core potentials for molecular calculations. Potentials for K to Au including the outermost core orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Williams, J.; Haq, S.; Raval, R. The bonding and orientation of the amino acid L-alanine on Cu (110) determined by RAIRS. Surf. Sci. 1996, 368, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Park, S.; Yang, S.; Shin, N.; Lee, E.; Lee, H. Adsorption Configuration for Cysteine on Ge(100): Coverage Dependent Surface Reorientation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 14528–14531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, S.; Kim, Y.; Park, S.; Lim, H.; Lee, H. Adsorption Configuration of Serine on Ge(100): Competition between the Hydroxymethyl and Carboxyl groups of Serine During the Adsorption Reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 9131–9135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, H.; Chrysostomou, D.; FloIrs, J.; Zaera, F. Effect of Coadsorbed Oxygen on the Chemistry of Ammonia over Ni(110) Single-Crystal Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bernardo, C.G.P.M.; Gomes, J.A.N.F. The adsorption of ethylene on the (110) surfaces of copper, silver and platinum: A DFT study. J. Mol. Struct. 2002, 582, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, S.; Park, Y.; Kim, J.W.; Lee, H. Variation of Coverage-Dependent Attachment of Multifunctional Groups in Alanine and Leucine to the Ge(100)-2x1 Surface: Bonding Configuration and Adsorption Stability. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 19287–19292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Molecular structures of (a) leucine and (b) tyrosine.
Scheme 1. Molecular structures of (a) leucine and (b) tyrosine.
Applsci 10 01284 sch001
Figure 1. Reflection–absorption infrared (RAIR) spectra of (a) Leu and (b) Tyr on the Cu(110) surface at room temperature.
Figure 1. Reflection–absorption infrared (RAIR) spectra of (a) Leu and (b) Tyr on the Cu(110) surface at room temperature.
Applsci 10 01284 g001
Figure 2. (af) C 1s, N 1s, and O 1s core-level spectra for Leu (a,b, and c) and for Tyr (d,e, and f), in each case on the Cu(110) surface with an ~0.20 ML deposition: the dots indicate experimental values, and the solid lines represent the results of peak fittings.
Figure 2. (af) C 1s, N 1s, and O 1s core-level spectra for Leu (a,b, and c) and for Tyr (d,e, and f), in each case on the Cu(110) surface with an ~0.20 ML deposition: the dots indicate experimental values, and the solid lines represent the results of peak fittings.
Applsci 10 01284 g002
Figure 3. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations and molecular adsorption features for (a) the O–H dissociation bonded structure and (c) the O–H dissociated-N dative bonded structure of Leu and for (b) the O–H dissociated-N dative bonded structure and (d) the O–H dissociation bonded structure of Tyr on the Cu(110) surface. (e) Illustration of the difference for O-H dissociation bonded structure of Leucine versus the O-H dissociated –N dative bonded structure with a charged N for Tyrosine.
Figure 3. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations and molecular adsorption features for (a) the O–H dissociation bonded structure and (c) the O–H dissociated-N dative bonded structure of Leu and for (b) the O–H dissociated-N dative bonded structure and (d) the O–H dissociation bonded structure of Tyr on the Cu(110) surface. (e) Illustration of the difference for O-H dissociation bonded structure of Leucine versus the O-H dissociated –N dative bonded structure with a charged N for Tyrosine.
Applsci 10 01284 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, H.; Kim, H.S. Confirmation of Initial Stable Adsorption Structures of Leucine and Tyrosine Adsorbed on a Cu(110) Surface. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041284

AMA Style

Lee H, Kim HS. Confirmation of Initial Stable Adsorption Structures of Leucine and Tyrosine Adsorbed on a Cu(110) Surface. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(4):1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041284

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Hangil, and Hyun Sung Kim. 2020. "Confirmation of Initial Stable Adsorption Structures of Leucine and Tyrosine Adsorbed on a Cu(110) Surface" Applied Sciences 10, no. 4: 1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041284

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop