Next Article in Journal
Two Decades of TB Drug Discovery Efforts—What Have We Learned?
Previous Article in Journal
Lining Fatigue Test and Influence Zoning of Tridimensional Cross-Tunnel under High-Speed Train Loads
Previous Article in Special Issue
Water Vapour Promotes CO2 Transport in Poly(ionic liquid)/Ionic Liquid-Based Thin-Film Composite Membranes Containing Zinc Salt for Flue Gas Treatment
Open AccessArticle

Comparison of Capillary Flow Porometry (CFP) and Liquid Extrusion Porometry (LEP) Techniques for the Characterization of Porous and Face Mask Membranes

1
Institut de la Filtration et des Techniques Séparatives (IFTS), Rue Marcel Pagnol, 47510 Foulayronnes, France
2
Departamento de Física Aplicada, ETSIIAA, University of Valladolid, 34071 Palencia, Spain
3
Surfaces and Porous Materials (SMAP), Institute of Sustainable Processes (ISP), Dr. Mergelina s/n, University of Valladolid, Valladolid 47071, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(16), 5703; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165703
Received: 12 July 2020 / Revised: 23 July 2020 / Accepted: 24 July 2020 / Published: 17 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preparation, Characterization and Modelling of Advanced Membranes)
This work aims to study the characterization of several membrane filters by using capillary flow porometry (CFP) and liquid extrusion porometry (LEP) to obtain their pore size distributions (PSD) and mean pore diameters (davg). Three polymeric membranes of different materials namely, polyethylene (PET), cellulose nitrate (CN), and FM (face mask), and one inorganic (namely, alumina Al2O3) from ultrafiltration (UF)/microfiltration (MF) and particle separation were analyzed using a pressure constant fluid/liquid extrusion porometer, developed at institute de la filtration et techniques séparatives (IFTS). Several porosimetric fluids have been used to wet and penetrate into the porous/fiber structure. The results show the accuracy of the setup on characterizing membranes in the UF/MF range by CFP, with reasonable agreement with nominal data of the filters. Additionally, LEP extension of the equipment obtained good agreement with nominal data and the CFP results, while filters presenting a microstructure of highly interconnected pores (face mask) resulted in clear differences in terms of resulting PSD and average sizes when CFP and LEP results are compared. View Full-Text
Keywords: membrane characterization; pore-size distribution (PSD); capillary pressure; CFP; LEP membrane characterization; pore-size distribution (PSD); capillary pressure; CFP; LEP
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Peinador, R.I.; Calvo, J.I.; Ben Aim, R. Comparison of Capillary Flow Porometry (CFP) and Liquid Extrusion Porometry (LEP) Techniques for the Characterization of Porous and Face Mask Membranes. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5703.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop