Next Article in Journal
A Linear Programming Method for Finding a Minimal Set of Axial Lines Representing an Entire Geometry of Building and Urban Layout
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Thermal Exposure on Oil Shale Saturation and Reservoir Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Robust Adaptive Control for Nonlinear Aircraft System with Uncertainties
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Elongational and Shear Evaluation of Polymer Viscoelasticity during Flow in Porous Media
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Compositional Modeling to Analyze the Effect of CH4 on Coupled Carbon Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery Process

Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(12), 4272; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124272
by Jinhyung Cho 1, Gayoung Park 2, Seoyoon Kwon 2, Kun Sang Lee 3, Hye Seung Lee 3 and Baehyun Min 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(12), 4272; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124272
Submission received: 5 June 2020 / Revised: 16 June 2020 / Accepted: 19 June 2020 / Published: 22 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Oil Recovery Technologies)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript: applsci-842531 titled “Effects of CH4 on Displacement and Sweep Efficiencies of a Coupled Carbon Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery Process”, presents an interesting research study. The manuscript is well written and with proper English. Experimental results and research methods followed were sufficiently described. Figures are well displayed. However, I strongly suggested to distinguish Chapter “Results and Discussions” into two separate Chapters “Results” and “Discussion”. This would significantly contribute in better display the important findings presented in this research paper. In light of the CCS technologies described in this article, you may wish to consider the following paper: “Arvanitis et al. (2020), Potential Sites for Underground Energy and CO2 Storage in Greece: A Geological and Petrological Approach. Energies 13, 2707.”   Based on the aforementioned, minor revision is suggested prior to publication in the Journal of Applied Sciences.

Author Response

Please read the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The work herein presented is interesting for publication. I recommend authors the following minor corrections:

The title does not represent the work done. Please find a better title for your work.

Abstract needs to include more data about your results. I think you have a very good results section and you should emphasize it in the abstract.

Please do not include bullet points in the conclusion section. It looks rather an academic work than a paper like that.

Please check some minor grammatical mistakes.

Author Response

Please read the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop