1. Introduction
Recently, the problem of contamination of freshwater systems with microplastics has become particularly relevant [
1]. The content level of microplastics is often used as an indirect indicator of the ecological state of water bodies; however, there are currently no established regulations defining permissible concentrations of microplastics in aquatic environments. Numerous studies have investigated plastic pollution in rivers and marine systems [
2,
3,
4,
5], determining the concentration and composition of polymer particles, analyzing their spatial distribution in relation to potential pollution sources, and comparing observations across diverse geographic regions. At the same time, the impact of microplastics on aquatic ecosystems is diverse and potentially hazardous.
One major concern is the ability of microplastics to adsorb and transport various chemicals, including toxic pollutants, as well as biological entities such as bacteria and other microorganisms. Such interactions can alter the physicochemical properties of polymer particles and modify their ecological behavior, influencing their interactions with aquatic biota [
6,
7]. Microplastics also serve as substrates for the development of distinct microbial biofilms, giving rise to the so-called “plastisphere” [
8]. With increasing microplastic loads in freshwater systems worldwide, there is growing interest in understanding how biofilm formation on plastic surfaces shapes microbial community composition and alters ecosystem processes [
9,
10,
11].
Recent findings indicate that microplastic-associated biofilms can harbor microorganisms with clinically relevant traits, including antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), mobile genetic elements, and opportunistic pathogens capable of persisting in diverse aquatic environments [
12,
13,
14]. These plastisphere communities often differ substantially from surrounding planktonic microbiota and may facilitate horizontal gene transfer due to their high cell density and surface-attached growth. Such observations raise concerns that microplastics could act as vectors for the environmental dissemination of antimicrobial resistance, particularly in urban rivers exposed to stormwater runoff and wastewater inputs.
Despite increasing scientific attention, current knowledge of the microbial diversity, ecological roles, and functional potential of plastisphere communities remains fragmented. Understanding the taxonomic and functional attributes of microorganisms inhabiting microplastic surfaces is essential for assessing their potential environmental impact. Of particular interest are microorganisms capable of degrading polymeric materials or modulating the fate and toxicity of microplastics in natural environments.
In this study, we provide the first integrated assessment of microplastic pollution in the Setun River, a major urban tributary of the Moskva River. Our goals were to (i) identify polymer composition of microplastics, (ii) characterize the native riverine microbiota and compare it with plastic-enriched communities, and (iii) identify antimicrobial resistance determinants and potential plastic-degrading genes present in the river metagenomes. Together, these analyses offer new insight into the ecological and public-health relevance of the Setun River plastisphere.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection
The Setun River is one of the largest rivers in Moscow, flowing predominantly through urbanized landscapes. Its chemical and biological characteristics are shaped by multiple sources of anthropogenic pollution, including urban runoff, stormwater drainage carrying road-derived contaminants, and potential wastewater discharges from surrounding infrastructure.
Surface water samples were collected to assess microplastic concentrations using a trawl net designed specifically for capturing microplastic particles [
15,
16]. Such sampling approaches commonly rely on plankton nets [
17,
18] or MANTA nets adapted for surface microplastic collection. During sampling, a net approximately 2 m in length [
18] was deployed from a vessel for a designated period, with its inlet partially submerged to allow efficient collection of particles from the uppermost water layer. A spinner mechanism integrated into the system measured the volume of filtered water. After each trawling run, all retained material was transferred into containers for laboratory processing.
In this study, we used the LEI-MANTA300 net set (EkoInstrument LLC, San Jose, CA, USA), equipped with 300 µm mesh filtration bags (
Figure 1). The net inlet (30 cm × 15 cm) was fitted with a current meter to estimate the filtered water volume. The LEI-MANTA300 was towed behind the vessel at a speed of approximately 5 km/h, with towing duration adjusted according to the expected abundance of microplastics.
Following each sampling event, the net was thoroughly flushed to recover the entire filtered material into a detachable beaker. The contents were sieved through stainless-steel meshes of 5 mm (top) and 0.3 mm (bottom). Larger debris retained on the 5 mm sieve was discarded only after rinsing off microplastic particles. The fraction between 0.3 and 5 mm, consisting of microplastics and organic residues, was transferred to sterile containers and stored under refrigeration for subsequent microbiological analyses.
Due to the high organic content, samples underwent chemical digestion prior to microplastic identification. Each sample was transferred into a 2 L glass beaker placed on a magnetic stirrer with heating. A 30% NaOH solution was added and heated to 75–80 °C, after which 30% H2O2 was gradually introduced under continuous stirring until the sample became fully discolored, indicating the removal of organic matter. Digestion time ranged from 1 h to several hours depending on sample composition.
Because synthetic polymers remain unaffected by this treatment, the digested samples were sieved at 100 µm. A saturated saline solution was then applied for density separation using a funnel to isolate microplastics from mineral particles. The retained particles were examined under a stereomicroscope at up to 80× magnification. Microplastics were visually identified and categorized into three types: fragments, fibers, and films. This workflow enabled quantitative assessment of microplastic abundance and export from the river.
In addition, three water samples were collected from the Setun River for mWGS analysis and designated as C1, C2, and C3 (
Figure 2). Field sampling was conducted on 9 November 2022 to assess microplastic concentrations and microbial communities during autumn baseflow conditions. Water temperature ranged from 7 °C to 9 °C across stations, and the sampling period was chosen to represent hydrologically stable conditions prior to winter ice formation.
2.2. Composition of Plastics
Individual plastic fragments were examined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), which allows recording characteristic phase transitions in polymer materials. The measurement was performed on a DSC device (DSC 402 F1 Phoenix, Netzsch, Selb, Germany). The suspended plastic fragment was placed in an aluminum crucible and heated in the temperature range from 25 to 200 °C, at a rate of 10 S/min in an argon current of 50 mL/min. An empty aluminum crucible was used as a comparison sample. The peaks on the curves represent melting peaks, the kinks correspond to the glass transition, and the temperature of both can be compared with the literature data.
2.3. Culture Media
Bacterial cultures were maintained in two media: Luria–Bertani (LB) broth consisting of tryptone (10 g/L), yeast extract (5 g/L), and NaCl (10 g/L); Minimal M9 medium containing Na2HPO4 (6.8 g/L), KH2PO4 (3 g/L), NaCl (0.5 g/L), NH4Cl (1 g/L), glucose (0.1 g/L), MgSO4·7H2O (2.465 mg/L), thiamine-HCl (3.37 mg/L), CaCl2·2H2O (0.147 mg/L), adjusted to pH 7.0.
2.4. Experimental Design
There were two rounds of experiments. In the first experiment, cells from the initial river samples (C1–C3) were first cultivated overnight for 11 h in LB medium (37 °C, 220 rpm). An aliquot of each culture approximately 300–400 µL was transferred into 30 mL of M9 medium to a final OD600 of 0.1. Sterilized and pre-weighed plastic fragments of two polymer types, low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and polycaprolactone (PCL), were added to each culture. Cultivation was performed for 90–100 h (37 °C, 220 rpm). After growth, cells were transferred according to the following procedure (hereafter referred to as “passaging”): (i) aliquots were inoculated into fresh LB (10 mL) and incubated for 5–6 h to accumulate biomass; (ii) residual M9 medium was removed from the plastic, which was then replenished with fresh M9; (iii) biomass from LB cultures (OD600 ≈ 5–7) was reinoculated into the plastic-containing M9 to a final OD600 of 0.1. This cycle was repeated up to five times. Two cell subcultures were extracted from each sample: cells from liquid suspension were denoted as “Liq” subculture, while cells which remain attached to the plastic surface were denoted as “Pl” subculture. Surface-associated cells were detached using M9 salts supplemented with 0.05% SDS (1 h, 37 °C, 200 rpm). Both Liq and Pl subcultures were then cultivated in LB (37 °C, 200 rpm, 10–11 h). Plastic fragments were subsequently washed with ethanol, dried overnight, and re-weighed.
In the second experiment, passaging in LB was omitted. Instead, cultures were maintained long-term with plastic in M9 medium. Aliquots of LB-grown biomass (initial OD600 = 0.1) were inoculated into 30 mL of M9 containing plastics samples, which were used at the first step. Additionally, in one setup (of C2 origin), the biosurfactant surfactin was added at a final concentration of 30 mg/mL to test its effect on plastic biodegradation. Cultures were incubated for up to seven weeks with monitoring of OD600. Plastic fragments were washed, dried, and weighed at the end of the experiment to assess mass loss. Cells from the resulting suspensions were collected and used for microbial community analysis by full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing using Oxford Nanopore technology.
2.5. Microscopy of Plastic Surfaces
Plastic fragments were imaged before and after microbial cultivation using a standard light microscope microscope at magnifications of 10× and 20×. Both LDPE and PCL fragments were photographed. For each experimental sample (C1–C3), two to three replicate images were taken per plastic type. Images of the “before” state correspond to plastics prior to inoculation, while the “after” state corresponds to the end of Round I of cultivation. No additional imaging was performed after Round II. Representative images were archived for subsequent analysis of surface alterations.
2.6. Sequencing Experiments
Sequencing experiments were performed to characterize microbial communities associated with plastic fragments and liquid cultures, as well as the native Setun river microbial composition. Genomic DNA extraction was performed using Monarch DNA purification kit (NE BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), DNA quality was then evaluated by A260/A280 and A260/A230 absorbance ratios using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DNA library for the nanopore sequencing was prepared according to Native barcoding genomic DNA protocol (with EXP-NBD104, EXP-NBD 114, and SQK-LSK109), provided by Oxford nanopore (Oxford, UK), with the exception that at the barcoding ligation step samples were left overnight. Nanopore sequencing was performed using “MinION” with R9.4.1. flow cell (Oxford nanopore). Full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing (samples VT_1 to VT_16) was performed using Oxford Nanopore sequencing chemistry R10.4.1.
At the end of the first cultivation round, two distinct fractions were recovered from each experimental condition: Liq (liquid fraction)—cells collected from the suspended culture medium after the fifth passage. Pl (plastic-attached fraction)—cells detached from the surface of plastic fragments by washing. Both fractions were sequenced in order to compare planktonic and plastic-associated communities. The complete set of sequenced samples is summarized in
Table 1.
Planned comparisons were structured as follows:
Liq vs. Pl within the same sample and polymer type. For each inoculum (C1–C3) and each polymer (LDPE or PCL), paired Liq and Pl samples were compared. These comparisons reveal community differences between free-floating and plastic-attached cells. In total, eight such Liq–Pl pairs were analyzed.
Between-inoculum comparisons within the same fraction. To evaluate the effect of inoculum origin, Liq samples from C1, C2, and C3 were compared with each other, and the same was performed for Pl samples. These comparisons highlight community-level differences attributable to distinct river water sources.
Effect of surfactin. For inoculum C2, additional cultures were prepared with (+) and without (−) surfactin. Although secondary to the main design, these comparisons provide insight into the effect of surfactin on microbial colonization of plastics.
2.7. Sequencing Data Processing
Dorado [
19] (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, 0.9.1+c8c2c9f, model dna_r9.4.1_e8_sup@v3.6 for basecalling and dna_r9.4.1_e8_sup@v3.3_5mCG_5hmCG@v0 for modified basecalling), was used for basecalling, demultiplexing and adapter trimming. FastQC [
20] (v0.12.1) was used to assess the quality of reads. Chopper [
21] (v0.8.0) was used to filter out low quality reads with a threshold of Q15, and to filter by read length in 16S gene sequencing (1300 < read length < 1600 bp). Raw and processed fastq files were first assessed for sequencing quality and basic statistics using seqkit v2.10.1 [
22] (
Table A1).
2.8. Metagenome Assembly and Polishing
Long-read metagenome assemblies for samples C1–C3 were generated using Flye [
23] (v2.9.5-b1801) with the –meta option to enable metagenome-aware repeat resolution. Dorado basecalled reads (.fastq files) were used as input. The resulting contigs were then polished with Medaka [
24] (v2.0.1, model r941_prom_sup_g507) under default parameters to refine errors. The final polished contigs were used for all downstream taxonomic and functional analyses.
2.9. Taxonomic Classification
Taxonomic profiling of native river and plastic-associated microbial communities was performed using a combination of read classification and abundance estimation tools. For taxonomic classification, long-read datasets were analyzed with MetaMaps v0.1 [
25], which performs mapping of nanopore reads to a reference database followed by probabilistic assignment of reads to taxonomic nodes. The default MetaMaps database (“miniSeq+H”, 8 G compressed) includes 12,000 microbial genomes and the human reference genome. This approach provided species-level profiles of community composition and was used to compute relative abundances for samples C1–C3.
Contigs polished with Medaka were taxonomically classified using Kraken2 v2.1.6 [
26] with the Standard-16 database (Kraken2 Standard database capped at 16 GB, release 14 July 2025). The database includes complete bacterial, archaeal, viral, and human reference genomes from RefSeq. Classification reports were generated for each sample (C1–C3) and used to estimate the percentage of fragments covered by the clade rooted at each taxonomic level.
In parallel, reads from bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing (samples VT_1 to VT_16) were classified with EMU [
27], which applies expectation–maximization for abundance estimation from nanopore reads. EMU uses a curated full-length 16S rRNA reference database, a combination of rrnDB v5.6 and NCBI 16S RefSeq from 17 September 2020. Taxonomy is also from NCBI on the same date. The resulting database contains 49,301 sequences from 17,555 unique bacterial and archaeal species.
Alpha and beta diversity metrics were computed using the scikit-bio v0.7.0 [
28] Python package. Alpha diversity indices included Shannon entropy, Simpson index, and observed richness. Beta diversity was estimated using Bray–Curtis dissimilarities. Distance matrices were used to compare community similarity across native and enrichment samples.
2.10. Screening for AMR and Plastic-Degrading Enzymes
Protein sequences were extracted from polished contigs using Prodigal v2.6.3 [
29]. Native communities C1–C3 were checked for antimicrobial resistance genes using AMRFinderPlus v4.0.23 [
30].
To find previously reported plastic-degrading proteins in native communities C1–C3 we used PlasticDB [
31]—a database of microorganisms and proteins linked to plastic biodegradation. PlasticDB contains records for 1701 protein sequences which are known to degrade plastics, records also contain information on taxonomic label and type of plastic. Protein sequences from Prodigal v2.6.3 were aligned to PlasticDB database using DIAMOND v2.1.13 [
32].
4. Discussion
The analysis revealed that polyethylene and polypropylene were the predominant polymers across all samples. Both materials were present as fragments of varying morphology and color, suggesting multiple sources and indicating that household plastic waste is likely the major contributor of microplastics in the river. Some fragments exhibited no detectable thermal transitions within the studied temperature range. This may indicate that their transition temperatures lie outside the experimental window—for instance, rubbers with glass transition temperatures below room temperature, or more thermally stable polymers with transitions above the analyzed range. The absence of visible transitions may also point to the presence of thermosetting polymers, such as certain polyurethanes, phenol–formaldehyde, or epoxy resins, which do not soften or melt before thermal decomposition. It is also important to note that all samples were collected from the surface water layer, which naturally enriches the dataset with polymers of density equal to or lower than that of water—primarily polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene—whereas denser materials, such as polyethylene terephthalate, are less likely to be encountered under these sampling conditions.
This study also set out to examine whether riverine microbiota from the Setun can colonise and degrade representative polymers (LDPE and PCL), and how the community structure shifts between the native water column, plastic-attached biofilms, and the corresponding liquid phases. Several consistent patterns emerge.
First, native Setun communities were Pseudomonadota-dominated, with Aeromonas and Enterobacteriaceae as major constituents, a composition typical of temperate freshwater systems influenced by urban inputs [
35]. It should be noted that enrichment cultures in this study were incubated at 37 °C, a temperature substantially higher than the in situ river conditions (7–9 °C). This laboratory setting accelerates microbial growth but also might selectively favor mesophilic taxa.
After enrichment on plastics in minimal medium, however, virtually all cultures converged toward low-diversity Bacillota communities dominated by the
Bacillus cereus group across inocula, fractions (Liq vs. Pl), and polymers. This shift was accompanied by a marked loss of alpha diversity and near-monoculture states. Such strong selection is consistent with the ability of spore-forming Gram-positives (such as
Bacillus cereus) to withstand nutrient stress and repeated handling [
36], the ready deployment of secreted hydrolases/esterases [
37], and rapid biofilm development on hydrophobic surfaces in minimal medium, as reported for other plastic-enrichment experiments [
38].
The dominance of Bacillota observed in the enrichment cultures can be attributed, at least in part, to the incubation temperature of 37 °C, which differs markedly from the ambient river temperature (7–9 °C). Such conditions might preferentially stimulate the growth of mesophilic microorganisms, including many Bacillota representatives, and therefore influence the resulting community composition independently of the original environmental structure. Although specific summer temperature records for the Setun River are not available, surface waters of rivers in the Moscow region typically reach approximately 18–22 °C during the warm season. Because the Setun River is expected to follow a similar seasonal pattern, repeating the enrichment experiment under these warmer, seasonally relevant thermal conditions could provide a more ecologically representative assessment of microbial dynamics and plastic-degrading potential.
Second, the materials behaved as expected from polymer chemistry. PCL, an aliphatic polyester with hydrolysable ester bonds, exhibited visible surface erosion and the largest gravimetric losses (up to 17 mg over seven weeks:
), whereas LDPE—an inert C–C backbone polyolefin—showed negligible and often sub-mg changes over comparable time frames. Microscopy corroborated this contrast: after cultivation, PCL surfaces became smoother, consistent with partial surface restructuring during biodegradation, whereas LDPE surfaces showed no visible changes and remained morphologically identical to their initial state. The pattern aligns with a broad literature showing that PCL is readily degraded by bacterial and fungal lipases/cutinases [
39,
40], while LDPE generally requires oxidative/photochemical pretreatment before measurable biotic mass loss occurs [
41,
42].
Third, adding the lipopeptide biosurfactant surfactin modestly diversified communities and reproducibly increased the relative abundance of Pseudomonadota (notably Ralstonia) in some PCL setups, with a corresponding tendency toward larger PCL mass loss compared with surfactant-free controls. Surfactants can increase the apparent bioavailability of hydrophobic substrates by lowering surface tension and improving wetting [
43], and they can restructure biofilms—effects that plausibly underlie the trends observed here [
44]. While our design was not powered for formal inference about surfactants, the directionality suggests that biosurfactant dosing could serve as a useful experimental lever for future work.
Our findings are consonant with the emerging view that plastics create distinctive microbial niches (the “plastisphere”) whose composition is shaped by polymer type, environmental context, and time [
45,
46]. Field and mesocosm studies consistently report rapid biofilm formation on plastics and divergence from surrounding planktonic communities, often with selection for taxa equipped for biofilm life and surface-associated metabolism [
38]. The pronounced convergence toward Bacillus observed here under laboratory enrichment indicates that medium composition and transfer regime can strongly override the river’s native signal—an important caveat when extrapolating enrichment results back to natural settings.
In this study, we deliberately cross-validated taxonomic composition and relative abundances with three orthogonal pipelines that differ in input molecules, algorithms, and reference space: (1) long-read shotgun read mapping with MetaMaps (miniSeq+H database) to assign individual nanopore reads probabilistically and derive species-level community profiles for C1–C3, (2) contig-level k-mer classification of polished assemblies using Kraken2 (Standard-16 GB RefSeq build) to summarize the percentage of fragments covered by each clade (a contig-coverage-style abundance), and (3) full-length 16S rRNA amplicon profiling with EMU (expectation–maximization on a curated rrnDB+NCBI 16S reference) to estimate species-level proportions for VT1–VT16. Together these methods consistently recovered Pseudomonadota-rich native river microbiota and Bacillus-dominated enrichment cultures, but they are not numerically interchangeable: MetaMaps yields read-based relative abundances, Kraken2 on contigs reflects assembly-weighted fragment coverage (thereby down-weighting low-abundance/assembly-refractory taxa), and EMU infers proportions from marker-gene reads though does not account for rRNA copy-number and primer biases. In practice, we therefore interpret concordant directional trends across methods (e.g., Pseudomonadota → Bacillota shift; surfactin-linked Ralstonia increases on PCL) as robust signals, while treating absolute percentages with caution, especially for clades that are hard to resolve by 16S alone or that may be under-assembled. Going forward, we can make the three methods agree better by using the same taxonomy in all databases, correcting 16S results for rRNA gene copy number, adding internal standards to calibrate abundances, and double-checking key taxa with genome-resolved bins (MAGs). This keeps the strengths of read mapping, contig classification, and 16S profiling without forcing everything into one tool.
Our assemblies of samples C1–C3 encode a broad spectrum of antimicrobial resistance determinants spanning efflux, drug-modifying enzymes, antifolate, sulfonamide, tetracycline, fosfomycin, phenicol, and multiple -lactamase classes (A, C, D, and metallo--lactamases B1/B2). Notably, we detected an intact oqxAB multidrug efflux operon, high-identity tetracycline MFS efflux tet(E), macrolide mph(A), sul1 with trimethoprim dfrA12/dfrA17, fosA variants, and a phenicol catA, with the majority of representatives showing ≥99–100% amino-acid identity and full coverage against curated references. In addition, we recovered -lactamases across all Ambler classes, including TEM-1/SHV-11 (A), ACT/FOX/MOX (C), OXA variants (D), and metallo--lactamases BcII (B1) and CphA family (B2), plus two mcr-3-like phosphoethanolamine transferases (one full-length call and one truncated high-identity fragment). Two contigs also exhibited the canonical class 1 integron 3′-conserved region signature (sul1–qacEΔ1 with aadA/dfr cassettes), consistent with potentially mobile MDR modules. Taken together, these data place last-line polymyxin (mcr-like) and carbapenem resistance mechanisms alongside broad efflux and cassette-borne ARGs in the same metagenome, underscoring the public-health relevance of the Setun plastisphere resistome.
These genomic signals align with the emerging consensus that microplastic biofilms can enrich ARGs and mobile genetic elements and act as vectors across aquatic habitats (the “plastisphere” as AMR reservoir) [
12,
13,
14]. Reviews and field studies report thicker biofilms on plastics, elevated ARG burdens (e.g.,
intI1/sul1), and conditions that favor horizontal gene transfer relative to natural substrates. The
oqxAB operon we observed is a well-characterized plasmid-mediated PMQR determinant [
47] conferring reduced susceptibility to quinolones, chloramphenicol/phenicols, nitrofurantoin, and more, and it has spread widely among
Enterobacterales; its presence is therefore a plausible contributor to multidrug phenotypes.
The
mcr-3-like hits are notable because aquatic bacteria and environmental waters have been repeatedly implicated in the emergence and circulation of
mcr genes and their mobilization on plasmids across Enterobacteriaceae [
48,
49]. The co-occurrence of
sul1 with
qacEΔ1 in integron contexts further suggests co-selection by biocides and disinfectants, a mechanism demonstrated in environmental matrices and wastewater where quaternary ammonium compounds enrich class 1 integrons [
50,
51].
Mechanistically, the metallo-
-lactamases we recovered map onto known environmental and clinical lineages. CphA (subclass B2) is a carbapenemase native to
Aeromonas spp. and has been associated with clinical, occasionally under-detected, carbapenem resistance; BcII is the canonical
Bacillus cereus group MBL, prevalent as an intrinsic determinant across the clade [
52,
53]. Given the strong
Bacillus cereus-group dominance in our enrichment cultures, the presence of BcII-type MBLs is also congruent with community structure.
Aligning proteins from C1-C3 to PlasticDB yielded one high-confidence enzyme: a PHB/PHA depolymerase homolog most similar to
Bacillus thuringiensis PhaZ. This is consistent with the well-documented capacity of
Bacillus spp. to encode PHB/PHA depolymerases and de-polymerize intracellular or extracellular PHAs [
54,
55]. Because PHAs are aliphatic polyesters designed to be biodegradable, their enzymatic depolymerization is widespread in soils and waters; by contrast, abiotic pretreatment is usually required before microbes can attack recalcitrant polyolefins (e.g., LDPE). Thus, the enzyme-level signal we found should not be over-interpreted as evidence for polyethylene catabolism. Instead, it aligns with the material behavior we observed experimentally: negligible loss of LDPE and clear surface erosion with mass loss for the aliphatic polyester PCL, which is known to be susceptible to lipases and cutinases.